Re: [PROPOSAL] Local Repository Separation

2007-09-18 Thread Kenney Westerhof
there are multiple projects in the reactor, as a default, seems useful to me. -- Kenney Christian. On 18-Sep-07, at 8:22 AM, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Btw, we don't necessarily require the workspace repo to be present in the ~/.m2/ directory. It could just aswell be target/workspace-repo

Re: [PROPOSAL] Local Repository Separation

2007-09-18 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Hi, Reply is below. Brett Porter wrote: Hi Kenney, On 14/09/2007, at 9:15 PM, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Hi, I sent a mail a few days ago but it didn't make it to the list. One very important feature would be the separation of build artifacts (maven plugins and their dependencies

Re: [PROPOSAL] Local Repository Separation

2007-09-14 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Hi, I sent a mail a few days ago but it didn't make it to the list. One very important feature would be the separation of build artifacts (maven plugins and their dependencies), and project artifacts. The separation isn't clear in maven itself - repo's get mixed up, wrong repo's consulted;

Re: [proposal] Make like reactor build mode

2007-09-06 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Hi, FYI I reported this as a Jira issue almost a year ago: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2576 oh. I just saw your comment on the issue referring to this. Yes, this is exactly the same issue ;) -- Kenney Brian E. Fox wrote: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Make+Like+Reactor+Mode

Re: Plexus container 1/2 artifact problems [was: Bad links on plugin index page]

2007-08-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
|Dependencies), not in the artifact resolver. -- Kenney Kenney Westerhof wrote: Hi, I added a sleep to the test and quickly copied /tmp/surefire*tmp to examine them. The following 2 entries in the surefire tmp file are the cause: surefire45886tmp:classPathUrl.30=/home/forge/.m2/repository/org

Re: Plexus container 1/2 artifact problems [was: Bad links on plugin index page]

2007-08-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Dennis Lundberg wrote: Thanks for looking into this Kenney. Are you saying that that the problem is really in maven itself, and version 2.0.7 in particular as it uses the shading thingy? Yes, the problem is in maven itself. It uses a shaded embedder but that's okay. 2.0.7 uses plexus

Re: Plexus container 1/2 artifact problems [was: Bad links on plugin index page]

2007-08-14 Thread Kenney Westerhof
to see exactly which jars are used. -- Kenney Brett Porter wrote: On 12/08/2007, at 6:56 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Looks like a bad plexus snapshot on my end, since it's fine on the zone too. testRender(org.apache.maven.doxia.siterenderer.DefaultSiteRendererTest) Time elapsed: 0.275 sec

Re: Umask on minotaur

2007-08-14 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Ssh into minotaur and: if your shell is bash, do: touch .bashrc echo umask 002 .bashrc if your shell is tcsh: touch .tcshrc echo umask 002 .tcschrc etc etc.. Note that putting the umask command in .profile does NOT work since wagon uses a non-login shell. -- Kenney Brian E

Re: Enforcer Sources

2007-08-14 Thread Kenney Westerhof
, but i'm not sure.. To get this to work in a nice way maven will need to be fixed, I think. -- Kenney -Original Message- From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 8:09 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Enforcer Sources Brian, Can we follow the same

Re: Extending Pom to Include Artifact Installation Instructions

2007-08-12 Thread Kenney Westerhof
think that a general solution outside of the .NET context would be useful for other language support. There are two. The one in 2.0.x allows you to drop in a JAR that contains a replacement resolver which is used. John used this for the RPM resolver. In 2.1.x Kenney made this cleaner by allow

Re: *Completely* unfiltered/evaluated mojo parameter?

2007-08-11 Thread Kenney Westerhof
: source println $${basedir} /source -- Kenney Jason Dillon wrote: Hey, is there anyway to get a specific mojo parameters value passed in *completely* unfiltered or evaluated with the default property expansion? I'd like to get the XML

Re: An easy way to merge 2 plugin.xml's into one?

2007-08-11 Thread Kenney Westerhof
In Maven-project, there's org.apache.maven.project.ModelUtils, which has some methods to merge plugin definitions. Just curious, what do you need this for? -- Kenney Jason Dillon wrote: Is there an _easy_ way to merge 2 plugin.xml's into one? Basically taking the mojos and dependencies bits

Umask on minotaur

2007-08-10 Thread Kenney Westerhof
3264 Aug 9 13:59 maven-invoker-2.0.7-20070809.205849-2.pom -rw-r--r-- 1 jdcasey apcvs 32 Aug 9 13:59 maven-invoker-2.0.7-20070809.205849-2.pom.md5 -rw-r--r-- 1 jdcasey apcvs 40 Aug 9 13:59 maven-invoker-2.0.7-20070809.205849-2.pom.sha1 -rw-rw-r-- 1 kenney apcvs 21102 Aug 10

Re: transitive dependencies, step by step

2007-08-07 Thread Kenney Westerhof
this information to avoid duplicate resolution. [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/shared/trunk/maven-dependency-tree [2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/trunk/maven-project-info-reports-plugin -- Kenney Jan Van Besien wrote: Hi all I'm currently developping a maven plugin for which

Re: maven-xcode-plugin?

2007-08-07 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Hi committers, Didn't we have a sandbox where ASF committers not on the maven team can commit for this purpose? Or is the XCode not something we want to support 'natively'? I remember a discussion about moving non-vital plugins to mojo.. -- Kenney Curt Arnold wrote: On Aug 6, 2007, at 9:48

Re: it0088 broken

2007-07-30 Thread Kenney Westerhof
as the main pom without this bug reappearing). -- Kenney John Casey wrote: IIRC, path resolution was taking place in the project builder...which would mean that it could have happened during kenney's cleanup of the interpolation. Not sure, though. (I'm fairly certain on the timing of the path

Re: Resource filtering thoughts...

2007-07-10 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Daniel Kulp wrote: On Monday 09 July 2007 19:08, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Daniel Kulp wrote: On Monday 09 July 2007 14:42, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Daniel Kulp wrote: Yep. That's the #1 issue.I've completely given up on trying to get the string ${pom.version} outputted into the file

Re: [VOTE] Configure IDE plugins to download sources by default within Maven projects

2007-07-10 Thread Kenney Westerhof
(possibly fallback to sources) - if both are specified, download both. And: - don't make this a default; the default behaviour of attaching either source or javadoc when it's present in the local repo is fine though, but turning this on by default is just too slow. -- Kenney Mark Hobson wrote

Re: Proposal: Required declaration of properties in pom.xml

2007-07-10 Thread Kenney Westerhof
an error if a required variable is missing. And it would be nice to have help:describe-properties... -- Kenney Regards, Jochen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [VOTE] Configure IDE plugins to download sources by default within Maven projects

2007-07-10 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Brian E. Fox wrote: So I propose: - if -DdownloadSources is specified, download sources and fallback to javadoc, just as it is now - if -DdownloadJavaDoc is specified, download javadoc (possibly fallback to sources) - if both are specified, download both. And: - don't make this a

Re: Resource filtering thoughts...

2007-07-10 Thread Kenney Westerhof
@ - @foo@ (or @@foo@@ - @foo@ ?) @foo@ - value_of_foo @foo@@ - value_of_foo@, or @foo@, or @foo@@ ? Maybe it's better if we leave the @foo@ interpretation as-is. ;) -- Kenney Dan On Tuesday 10 July 2007 12:05, John Casey wrote: Yeah, escaping makes more sense to me, too. IMO it's a bit

Re: Version ranges and snapshots

2007-07-10 Thread Kenney Westerhof
and valid snapshot artifacts there determine wheter snapshots are used or not. -- Kenney Patrick On 7/6/07, Mark Hobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Whilst attempting to fix MNG-2994, I discovered MNG-3092 that was contrary to the 2.0 design docs: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3092 Brett

Re: Version ranges and snapshots

2007-07-10 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Max Bowsher wrote: Kenney Westerhof wrote: Patrick Schneider wrote: For now, I'm a fan of disallowing snapshots when they are not explicitly in the boundary, as per the patch. In my mind, the problem with a profile flag is that it's an all-or-nothing proposition. Any released artifacts

Re: Resource filtering thoughts...

2007-07-10 Thread Kenney Westerhof
:55 PM, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Daniel Kulp wrote: Personally, I was thinking of just doing $$ - $. Yah, that's already in place for plugin parameters. Thus, if you want ${pom.version} outputted, it would be $${pom.version}. I think @@ also needs to be done. Yup. My original idea

Re: Resource filtering thoughts...

2007-07-09 Thread Kenney Westerhof
'filterType' or something, if it's set. Either way, changes to the model won't happen until 2.1. So, what's the problem with the filtering? -- Kenney - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail

Re: Resource filtering thoughts...

2007-07-09 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Daniel Kulp wrote: On Monday 09 July 2007 14:42, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Daniel Kulp wrote: After battling with the braindead resource filtering once again for the ump-teenth time, I've decided I need to do something about it You dissin' my code huh? :) The main thing I'd like to do

Re: finding maven.home in the invoker

2007-07-08 Thread Kenney Westerhof
} \ ${CLASSWORLDS_LAUNCHER} $QUOTED_ARGS so ideally the maven.home property should just work. I don't know why it doesn't, but maybe we should look into that as maven just provides this information since version 2.0. -- Kenney String mavenHome = System.getProperty( maven.home

Wagon-webdav

2007-07-08 Thread Kenney Westerhof
wagon-webdav. WDYT? -- Kenney - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Configure IDE plugins to download sources by default within Maven projects

2007-07-04 Thread Kenney Westerhof
want that), which can take a few hours to do on a reasonably sized project. If you really need to, or want to, make a profile in settings.xml or config in a root pom. -- Kenney Some developpers might prefer to have javadoc linked, some sources linked and some both. Shouldn't the eclipse

Re: invoker test failure

2007-07-04 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Try again, I just committed a fix. -- Kenney Brian E. Fox wrote: I'm getting an error building the 2.0.7-snapshot invoker: Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 11.861 sec FAILURE! testBuildShouldFail(org.apache.maven.shared.invoker.DefaultInvokerTest) Time elapsed

Re: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4

2007-07-04 Thread Kenney Westerhof
-trunks/plugins/maven-eclipse-plugin/target/test-classes/m2repo and it indefinitely hangs at this point, no cpu load. Tested with maven 2.1 and 2.0.7. Otherwise the plugin works great. -- Kenney Brian E. Fox wrote: It's been about 5 months since an eclipse plugin release and we have lots of fixes

Re: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4

2007-07-04 Thread Kenney Westerhof
] Total time: 9 seconds btw, tests take about 7 minutes whereas bootstrapping maven itself takes only 3 minutes. my -1 stands, unless I'm the only one where this fails. -- Kenney Kenney Westerhof wrote: I assume this is a vote to _release_ maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4. -1 until the tests are fixed

Re: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4

2007-07-04 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Final update: I checked out the tag cleanly, ran another build and it passed fine. The build took 9 mins 37 seconds. Ridiculous, but: +1 Kenney Westerhof wrote: Update: It seems i was impatient, it took almost 3 minutes to run that single test. After that it continued (on 2.0.7), but I got

Re: Question regarding 2.1 Versioning

2007-06-27 Thread Kenney Westerhof
are the problems you're experiencing atm. using maven's built-in versioning? There's still some work to be done here. The solutions specified there are not implemented yet, and won't be until 2.1. -- Kenney - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: Contextualizable implemented, but not invoked

2007-06-27 Thread Kenney Westerhof
'extensions' or similar. So it looks like the filtering isn't applied to the extensions, only to plugins.. -- Kenney Jochen Wiedmann wrote: More info: I cannot reproduce the problem with another Mojo, which isn't declared as an extension

Re: Contextualizable implemented, but not invoked

2007-06-26 Thread Kenney Westerhof
+ Contextualizable.class + : + Contextualizable.class.getClassLoader() ); } to your mojo and see what it prints? -- Kenney Thanks, Jochen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [m2] Conflict resolvers

2007-06-25 Thread Kenney Westerhof
on where you build (how big the reactor is). -- Kenney This is basically our situation and why we need a more intuitive conflict resolver than nearest-wins. You can see that the concept of nearness becomes more and more arbitrary as the dependency tree grows. From here, the plan is to supplement

Re: Encoding issues for 2.0.8

2007-06-23 Thread Kenney Westerhof
for this, since they're designed for it: javax.xml.transform.Source and implementations (StreamSource comes to mind). -- Kenney regards, Hervé On 23/06/2007, at 5:29 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: Le vendredi 22 juin 2007, Arnaud HERITIER a écrit : Be careful, because when you read an xml file with a reader

Re: [m2] Conflict resolvers

2007-06-22 Thread Kenney Westerhof
, but there are too much options to choose from to really write something ;) -- Kenney [snip] Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Sequence of events to ramping up Maven 2.1

2007-06-22 Thread Kenney Westerhof
there are duplicate children, or they are referred to by seveal pages (the pages listed by the 'children' feature refer to 'top level' documents...?) -- Kenney - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e

Re: Encoding issues for 2.0.8

2007-06-22 Thread Kenney Westerhof
to be changed and there were just too many changes across plexus and maven at the time to push this through. -- Kenney Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: Le jeudi 21 juin 2007, Jason van Zyl a écrit : It seems like there are many problems with encoding that could be easily solved with a couple tweaks to modello

Re: .isSnapshot changes version

2007-06-22 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: Le mercredi 20 juin 2007, Kenney Westerhof a écrit : Also see https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/surefire/trunk/maven-surefire-plugin /src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/surefire/SurefirePlugin.java line 494. I tried to fix this a while back but it's a big mess

Re: Surefire report failure.

2007-06-22 Thread Kenney Westerhof
the snapshot repository? If so, what's broken there? -- Kenney Ole-Martin Mørk wrote: I am having the same problem. Just appeared today out of blue.. What has happened with the surefire plugins lately? It seems like people are deploying a lot of broken surefire artifacts to the central

Re: .isSnapshot changes version

2007-06-20 Thread Kenney Westerhof
is the one containing the timestamp-buildernumber IIRC. -- Kenney Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: Le mercredi 20 juin 2007, Brian E. Fox a écrit : I discovered http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2961 while working on mdep a while back. same for me while working on http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MANTTASKS-18

Re: DefaultArtifactCollector event change

2007-06-19 Thread Kenney Westerhof
it that implements the spec. Whenever we change/improve the spec, it'll be an easy adjustment since it's not hardcoded in the dep resoluion, and we can simply apply different strategies for different versions of the poms/maven versions. -- Kenney Ralph

Re: what mailing list does jira notify on? I cannot remember.

2007-06-19 Thread Kenney Westerhof
John Casey wrote: Sorry, I just realized that in my recent email shuffling, I lost one of the mailing lists. Which one does JIRA send notifications on? Is there a list of the maven MLs somewhere? -j [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Kenney

Re: Deployed attached snapshot artifacts have version number one higher than expected.

2007-06-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
creates the wrong timestamp/buildnumber then you've found a bug. -- Kenney Mark Donszelmann wrote: Hi I am attaching artifacts to the main (jar) artifact in my plugin for maven. All works fine for versioned plugins, but for SNAPSHOTS I see the following behavior: 1. mvn install installs

Re: maven-dependency-tree changes for 1.1

2007-06-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
-components? The help:dependencies goal shows a tree of dependencies, and it didn't work too well because the algorithm used there didn't match the internal algorithm from maven itself, so the report was quite useless. Is this an attempt to fix that? -- Kenney Mark Hobson wrote: Hi there, I've

Expression evaluation

2007-06-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
.* and project.*) so results may vary. It basically comes down to: we have these pom.*, project.* and env.* prefixes, but they aren't used at all. Hope to get some feedback soon, Kenney - To unsubscribe, e-mail

depMgt (mng-1577 again....)

2007-06-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
present in all of maven, so that dependencies can override depMgt, as is the case now, and also apply that to transitive deps, OR we let depMgt override both local and transitive deps. Or, is this the intended behaviour after all? -- Kenney

Re: depMgt (mng-1577 again....)

2007-06-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
to handle versions: 1) declare defaults for direct dependencies 2) declare overrides for transitive ones we need a new element, like 'transitiveDependencyManagement'. This is something I hope we won't support in 2.1... -- Kenney -Original Message- From: Kenney Westerhof [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: depMgt (mng-1577 again....)

2007-06-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Ralph Goers wrote: Kenney Westerhof wrote: This somewhat describes the situation: - depMgt for artifact X is used to provide defaults for direct dependencies of artifact X, and for overrides of transitive dependencies on X, unless there's also a direct dependency on X in which case

Re: Expression evaluation

2007-06-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Jason van Zyl wrote: On 16 Jun 07, at 1:18 AM 16 Jun 07, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Hi, where's the spec for this? I'm working on MNG-2651 and similar, and I'm a bit at a loss as how to proceed. What does the 'env.' prefix do? System props, env props, or project props? Should 'pom

Re: Expression evaluation

2007-06-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Jason van Zyl wrote: On 16 Jun 07, at 9:57 AM 16 Jun 07, Kenney Westerhof wrote: So before I write something down that's more to the point than an enumeration of the flaws in the current implementation and the problems it gives us, I'd like to get concensus about the proper way to do

Re: JIRA Smackdown

2007-06-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
of the high overhead. wdyt? -- Kenney Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, The 2.0.7 release will go out tomorrow, and in order to get some decent vote feedback it would be good to clean up JIRA so that we have an accurate 2.0.x list people can vote on for issues they would like fixed in 2.0.8. I created

Re: svn commit: r547483 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-dependency-plugin: ./ src/test/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/dependency/ src/test/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/dependency/testUtils/ src/test/jav

2007-06-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
. Putting it in a parent or root pom will promote use of snapshots. my 2 cents, Kenney Mark Hobson wrote: On 15/06/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: brianf Date: Thu Jun 14 18:50:14 2007 New Revision: 547483 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=547483 Log

Re: Adding wildcards to IncludesArtifactFilter

2007-06-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
... Cheers, Kenney Cheers, Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: [m2] Artifact filtering in DefaultArtifactCollector

2007-06-13 Thread Kenney Westerhof
in the transitive dependency trails, then filtering can occur before resolution. btw, which one is it? I need to doc that in the wiki [1]. Cheers, Kenney [1] http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Maven+2.1+Artifact+Resolution+Specification Cheers, Mark

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.7 - surefire problem

2007-06-13 Thread Kenney Westerhof
wheter it's a fault in surefire or in maven 2.0.7? Thanks, Kenney Mark Donszelmann wrote: Hi tried 2.0.7 on FreeHEP, seems to work on most parts, except it tells me following in one case: RUN ABORTED java.lang.LinkageError org.apache.maven.surefire.Runner An exception or error caused

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.7 - surefire problem

2007-06-13 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Mark Donszelmann wrote: Hi Kenney, Hi Mark, I was using 2.1.3 for surefire. Changed it to 2.3, and still get error (slightly different): Hi, this is fixed later on; i think you're missing a dependency on junit. Let me know if this is the case. Can't be due to 2.0.7 though, unless

Re: AW: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.7 - surefire problem

2007-06-13 Thread Kenney Westerhof
-2.0.7. It seems the test phase always requires the junit dependency (I don't call it explicitly in the POM). Cheers, Frank -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Kenney Westerhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2007 17:13 An: Maven Developers List Betreff: Re: [VOTE

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.7

2007-06-13 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Jason van Zyl wrote: tentative -1 for releasing as is: I found a serious bug in maven 2.0.6 and 2.0.7 (2.0.5 works fine): mvn clean deploy on plexus-utils fails (stacktrace and output below) due to a NoClassDefFound on IOUtil in plexus-utils. I'm using released versions of wagon and the

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.7

2007-06-13 Thread Kenney Westerhof
a problem. So if you can do a quick check using the snapshot of surefire then we can work from there to make them work together. Kenney can help you track it down and we'll fix the problem. If necessary we'll try to accelerate the release of Surefire and get that out before we push 2.0.7

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.7

2007-06-13 Thread Kenney Westerhof
is it downloaded... Anyway, I'm revoking my -1 and changing it to +1, though not being able to deploy p-c-d or p-u is a serious drawback. But i guess it doesn't matter as 2.0.6 has the same problems so it's not worse ;) -- Kenney - Brett On 14/06/2007, at 2:32 AM, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Jason van Zyl

Re: Problems with release:prepare

2007-06-12 Thread Kenney Westerhof
and see if it matches svn://server001/trunk/product. -- Kenney Regards, Graham -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: When There's No More Room In Jiragoon, The Closed Will Walk Among Us: Dawn of the MNG-1577!

2007-06-09 Thread Kenney Westerhof
be the spec itself. Tests can contain bugs too, or don't test all cases. Writing good tests is the hardest part in software developement processes, apart from writing a good specification. -- Kenney Arnaud On 07/06/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ultimately the short answer is who cares

Re: Idea for modules enhancement

2007-06-09 Thread Kenney Westerhof
- they have to very distinct packagings and cannot even have compile-time dependencies AFAIK. src/java/ src/dotnet/ could become src/main/java src/main/dotnet or even src/m1/main/java/ src/m2/main/dotnet/ or m1/src/main/java m2/src/main/dotnet, which solves the problem. -- Kenney Brett

Re: When There's No More Room In Jiragoon, The Closed Will Walk Among Us: Dawn of the MNG-1577!

2007-06-07 Thread Kenney Westerhof
I wanted to get some feedback first, flesh it out on the dev list and then jot it down. Need some feedback as to how it's supposed to work now and what we want. If there's no response within a reasonable amount of time I'll just put it in the wiki. Thanks, Kenney Jason van Zyl wrote

Re: When There's No More Room In Jiragoon, The Closed Will Walk Among Us: Dawn of the MNG-1577!

2007-06-07 Thread Kenney Westerhof
, or somebody else already thought of this solution - I don't mean to offend anybody by calling it that). Thanks, Kenney Jason van Zyl wrote: On 7 Jun 07, at 8:01 AM 7 Jun 07, Kenney Westerhof wrote: I wanted to get some feedback first, flesh it out on the dev list and then jot

Re: Surefire (Fwd: NoSuchMethodError with surefire-booter-2.3.1-20070606.032942-4)

2007-06-06 Thread Kenney Westerhof
I'm on top of it, thanks for the pointer. I think someone deployed the booter and not the plugin or vice versa. just redeployed 2.3.1-snappy -- Kenney Jason van Zyl wrote: Just making sure Kenney and Brett see this as I'm currently trying to find a problem with surefire and 2.0.7 which

Re: Surefire (Fwd: NoSuchMethodError with surefire-booter-2.3.1-20070606.032942-4)

2007-06-06 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Hi, I just found and fixed the bug after doing some testing of all possible config values for 2.3.1-snap and 2.4-snap. fix is in svn, i redeployed surefirebooter for 2.4 and 2.3.1, so everything should be peachy now. Turns out the '!' character was missing somewhere ;) -- Kenney Jason van

bugfix update

2007-06-06 Thread Kenney Westerhof
, please let me know. Cheers, Kenney

Re: When There's No More Room In Jiragoon, The Closed Will Walk Among Us: Dawn of the MNG-1577!

2007-06-06 Thread Kenney Westerhof
takes precedence if there's also a direct dependency declared? 6) Did I miss anything else? Thanks for reading this far - it's pretty late, so this is basically a dd if=/dev/ram0 ;) -- Kenney Carlos Sanchez wrote: but you depend on B, so you want B, not C ;) On 6/6/07, Patrick Schneider

Re: svn commit: r544891 - /maven/components/branches/maven-2.0.x/pom.xml

2007-06-06 Thread Kenney Westerhof
I deployed all of it way before I committed this. Continuum shouldn't complain ;) Maybe we need to add some pluginrepo somewhere? It'd be temporarily, i've got a feeling 2.3.1 will be released asap as it contains major bugfixes. I just couldn't build it with 2.2. -- Kenney Vincent Siveton

Re: svn commit: r544891 - /maven/components/branches/maven-2.0.x/pom.xml

2007-06-06 Thread Kenney Westerhof
is fine for maven core apparently. Not sure about the IT's though, but I'm sure continuum will tell us. -- Kenney Vincent Siveton wrote: Thanks! Vincent 2007/6/6, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Vincent, I'm aware of that (the snapshot plugin repo probably isn't declared). I was asking

Re: useSystemClassLoader problems

2007-06-04 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Kenney Westerhof wrote: Brett Porter wrote: [snip] However, I'm rethinking setting it to default (which I did) - seems best to retain it as false. I did it because of another regression where clases in the system classloader weren't found in tests by default any more. I think that's

Re: useSystemClassLoader problems

2007-06-04 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Brett Porter wrote: Thanks Kenney! Please make sure to merge that up to the 2.3.x branch - this will close out SUREFIRE-335. Merged trunk to branch. I merged the last 3 revisions from trunk; the one before that was a merge from you from branch to trunk. It cleanly installs so I hope I

Re: [jira] Closed: (MNG-2203) Problem with duplicates

2007-06-03 Thread Kenney Westerhof
I agree, this is definitely an issue. If you specify the same dep (a:a) twice in the same pom, maven doesn't say anything, but takes the last one. Brett Porter wrote: Is this still an issue though? Maybe it should be left open for a simpler fix. - Brett On 01/06/2007, at 2:19 PM, Jason van

Re: Plugin parameter missing

2007-06-03 Thread Kenney Westerhof
=${was.home}/config */ protected String wsConfigDir Everything is okay. DEBUG (f) wasConfigDir = XYZ Is root is a reserved parameter name? Nope, see typo above. -- Kenney TIA - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: useSystemClassLoader problems

2007-05-31 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Brett Porter wrote: Hi Kenney, Would be interested to get your thoughts on the issues being seen with useSystemClassLoader and the reasoning for going with a JAR to execute it that way. Before I can continue with the release I need to put them to bed. I'll have to see what the issues

Re: Archetype packaging

2007-05-30 Thread Kenney Westerhof
the above, just wanted to pitch this in since it's been on my mind for a while now. -- Kenney Raphaël Piéroni wrote: Hi if i would create a new packaging for archetypes, what is the way (i don't need doco link about lifecycle hook of a mojo, i already know it ;) ) to have a specific metadata

Re: {SPAM 4.4} Maven 2.0.4 Checkout tag

2007-04-01 Thread Kenney Westerhof
use svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/tags/maven-2.0.4 and fix your smtp server ;) Peter Anning wrote: Spam detection software, running on the system fire.homenet.neonics.com, has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been

Re: MNG-2433

2007-03-19 Thread Kenney Westerhof
I know that legacy repositories keep getting pinged on each build, even if they're just updated. Is there also no network traffic when legacy repo's are in the repo list? -- Kenney Brett Porter wrote: On 19/03/2007, at 11:36 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Yah, I saw the logging which is why I used

Re: Relocations for existing artifacts in the repo

2007-03-17 Thread Kenney Westerhof
fixed versions anyway. Adding a parameter/argument/sysprop to override this would at least let people be aware that there can be unexpected results. tough one ;) -- Kenney Fabrizio Giustina wrote: Hi, I would like to start a discussion on how relocations in the central repo should be handled. I

Re: forceVersion for maven-install-plugin?

2007-03-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
; it temporarily installs the plugin in the local repository, backing up what's there; after the integration test, it restores the local repository. Jason Dillon wrote: On Mar 15, 2007, at 2:38 AM, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Jason Dillon wrote: How does a test repository help? I still need to configure

Re: [vote] MNG-1577 as the default behavior

2007-03-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
life' complex builds. The best way to do that I think is to apply it to 2.0.x and let people test it on their builds for a while. If it's breaking more than it fixes we can always roll back before the release. -- Kenney Brett Porter wrote: -1, at this point. I'd like to look at some specific test

Re: [vote] MNG-1577 as the default behavior

2007-03-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
etc. So why try to support the unpredictable behaviour in 2.0.x? I simply cannot understand how we can make 2.0.6 or newer behave in the same unpredictable way (the case where the dependency is NOT specified to override the depMgt section). That's just unsupportable. -- Kenney On 3/16/07, Jason

Re: [vote] MNG-1577 as the default behavior

2007-03-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Carlos Sanchez wrote: On 3/16/07, Kenney Westerhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Carlos Sanchez wrote: now poms in the repo that have dependencyManagement sections will start to change the behavior of current builds and people with 2.0.5 will get very different results than people with 2.0.6

Re: [vote] MNG-1577 as the default behavior

2007-03-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
buggy and only apply to 2.1. Fourth option: apply to both 2.0.x and 2.1. My vote goes to 4, after ofcourse we've tested a release candidate of 2.0.6. -- Kenney fabrizio On 3/16/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, After working with it a little this week I would like to propose

Re: forceVersion for maven-install-plugin?

2007-03-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
on the current artifact with the maven-it-plugin, so I think the easiest and best solution here is to just fix MNG-2677. -- Kenney Specifically what I mean is to add an execution of the maven-install-plugin:install w/forceVersion=testing to the integration-tests profile in the pre-integration-test phase

Re: version range question

2007-03-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
DefaultArtifactVersion(2.0.6) ) is true since 2.0.6 is in [2.0.5,). Or am I missing something here? -- Kenney Brian E. Fox wrote: Done. I fixed the problem and added the tests to a branch described here: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2876 Since it's very core (or maybe not if it's not really used) I'd

Re: Test failures in maven-source-plugin

2007-03-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Wendy Smoak wrote: On 3/14/07, Kenney Westerhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem is that it uses the Verifier to test. The Verifier uses the plugin from the local repo, not the current project. First, mvn clean install -Dmaven.test.skip=true, then mvn test and it'll work. I noticed

Re: version range question

2007-03-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
this - a lot of builds will fail, though it'll certainly meet expectations better. -- Kenney public void testContains() throws InvalidVersionSpecificationException { ArtifactVersion actualVersion = new DefaultArtifactVersion( 2.0.5 ); assertTrue( enforceVersion( 2.0.5

Re: Test failures in maven-source-plugin

2007-03-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
on the WAR plugin but I want more tests before changing anything. MNG-2677 -- Kenney Stéphane On 3/14/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/14/07, Kenney Westerhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem is that it uses the Verifier to test. The Verifier uses the plugin from the local

Re: version range question

2007-03-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
. Then maven _should_ use FOO 1.0 for A, B and C, causing C not to compile, if your patch is applied. Otherwise, the patch isn't good enough probably becuase there's other code that does not honor 2.0.5 NOT being in 2.0.6... -- Kenney It's easy to tweak my patch so that contains treats 2.0.5 == [2.0.5

Re: version range question

2007-03-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
this breaks other unit tests. I'll make an IT test and see what happens just patching the contains method. -Original Message- From: Kenney Westerhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 9:18 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: version range question Brian E. Fox

Re: maven-metadata.xml in version level repository directory?

2007-03-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
It's only available in snapshot version directories and contains a list of all the snapshot versions there and names the latest version. So it's useful for snapshots. Ole Ersoy wrote: Hi, Just wondering if there is a purpose to having maven-metadata.xml in the version directories (The

Re: ApacheCon?

2007-03-14 Thread Kenney Westerhof
I'l be there - it's in my country so how can I not go? :) I'm looking forward to meeting you in person (and others ofcourse). -- Kenney Brett Porter wrote: Hi, Who here will be at ApacheCon in May? I know Jason is as he is speaking. Anyone want to get together there? I'm currently working

Re: Test failures in maven-source-plugin

2007-03-14 Thread Kenney Westerhof
of this. -- Kenney Jason van Zyl wrote: On 13 Mar 07, at 1:30 AM 13 Mar 07, Stephane Nicoll wrote: Weird. Can you paste the surefire logs please? I believe they are caused by the testing harness. I too get failures but have been using it to make the embedder source jar for 10 bundles or so. I

Re: maven code style - eclipse

2007-03-14 Thread Kenney Westerhof
to patch. -- Kenney -D On 3/13/07, Kenney Westerhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dan Tran wrote: http://maven.apache.org/developers/maven-eclipse-codestyle.xml seems to be out of date ( the throws, extend, etc do not split ) Do we have another official one? I use https://svn.apache.org

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >