Re: [PROPOSAL] Local Repository Separation

2007-09-18 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Hi, Reply is below. Brett Porter wrote: Hi Kenney, On 14/09/2007, at 9:15 PM, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Hi, I sent a mail a few days ago but it didn't make it to the list. One very important feature would be the separation of build artifacts (maven plugins and their dependencies)

Re: [PROPOSAL] Local Repository Separation

2007-09-18 Thread Kenney Westerhof
. But a per reactor-build local workspace as a default, when there are multiple projects in the reactor, as a default, seems useful to me. -- Kenney Christian. On 18-Sep-07, at 8:22 AM, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Btw, we don't necessarily require the workspace repo to be present in the ~/

Re: [PROPOSAL] Local Repository Separation

2007-09-18 Thread Kenney Westerhof
the ~/.m2/ directory. It could just aswell be target/workspace-repo/ in the top level pom. -- Kenney - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PROPOSAL] Local Repository Separation

2007-09-14 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Hi, I sent a mail a few days ago but it didn't make it to the list. One very important feature would be the separation of build artifacts (maven plugins and their dependencies), and project artifacts. The separation isn't clear in maven itself - repo's get mixed up, wrong repo's consulted; build

Re: [proposal] "Make like" reactor build mode

2007-09-06 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Hi, FYI I reported this as a Jira issue almost a year ago: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2576 oh. I just saw your comment on the issue referring to this. Yes, this is exactly the same issue ;) -- Kenney Brian E. Fox wrote: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Make+Like+Reactor+Mode

Re: Plexus container 1/2 artifact problems [was: Bad links on plugin index page]

2007-08-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Dennis Lundberg wrote: Thanks for looking into this Kenney. Are you saying that that the problem is really in maven itself, and version 2.0.7 in particular as it uses the shading thingy? Yes, the problem is in maven itself. It uses a shaded embedder but that's okay. 2.0.7 uses p

Re: Plexus container 1/2 artifact problems [was: Bad links on plugin index page]

2007-08-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
e|Test)(ClasspathElements|Dependencies), not in the artifact resolver. -- Kenney Kenney Westerhof wrote: Hi, I added a sleep to the test and quickly copied /tmp/surefire*tmp to examine them. The following 2 entries in the surefire tmp file are the cause: surefire45886tmp:classPathUrl.30=/home

Re: Enforcer Sources

2007-08-14 Thread Kenney Westerhof
will be applied, but i'm not sure.. To get this to work in a nice way maven will need to be fixed, I think. -- Kenney -Original Message- From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 8:09 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Enforcer Sources Brian

Re: Umask on minotaur

2007-08-14 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Ssh into minotaur and: if your shell is bash, do: "touch .bashrc && echo umask 002 >> .bashrc" if your shell is tcsh: "touch .tcshrc && echo umask 002 >> .tcschrc" etc etc.. Note that putting the umask command in .profile does NOT work

Re: Plexus container 1/2 artifact problems [was: Bad links on plugin index page]

2007-08-14 Thread Kenney Westerhof
urefire*tmp files to see exactly which jars are used. -- Kenney Brett Porter wrote: On 12/08/2007, at 6:56 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Looks like a bad plexus snapshot on my end, since it's fine on the zone too. testRender(org.apache.maven.doxia.siterenderer.DefaultSiteRendererTest)

Re: Extending Pom to Include Artifact Installation Instructions

2007-08-12 Thread Kenney Westerhof
think that a general solution outside of the .NET context would be useful for other language support. There are two. The one in 2.0.x allows you to drop in a JAR that contains a replacement resolver which is used. John used this for the RPM resolver. In 2.1.x Kenney made this cleaner by allow the

Re: An easy way to merge 2 plugin.xml's into one?

2007-08-11 Thread Kenney Westerhof
In Maven-project, there's org.apache.maven.project.ModelUtils, which has some methods to merge plugin definitions. Just curious, what do you need this for? -- Kenney Jason Dillon wrote: Is there an _easy_ way to merge 2 plugin.xml's into one? Basically taking the and bit

Re: *Completely* unfiltered/evaluated mojo parameter?

2007-08-11 Thread Kenney Westerhof
dir}"' injected as a mojo parameter: println "$${basedir}" -- Kenney Jason Dillon wrote: Hey, is there anyway to get a specific mojo parameters value passed in *completely* unfiltered or evaluated with the default property

Umask on minotaur

2007-08-10 Thread Kenney Westerhof
-r--r-- 1 jdcasey apcvs 3264 Aug 9 13:59 maven-invoker-2.0.7-20070809.205849-2.pom -rw-r--r-- 1 jdcasey apcvs 32 Aug 9 13:59 maven-invoker-2.0.7-20070809.205849-2.pom.md5 -rw-r--r-- 1 jdcasey apcvs 40 Aug 9 13:59 maven-invoker-2.0.7-20070809.205849-2.pom.sha1 -rw-rw-r-- 1 kenney a

Re: maven-xcode-plugin?

2007-08-07 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Hi committers, Didn't we have a sandbox where ASF committers not on the maven team can commit for this purpose? Or is the XCode not something we want to support 'natively'? I remember a discussion about moving non-vital plugins to mojo.. -- Kenney Curt Arnold wrote: On Aug 6

Re: transitive dependencies, step by step

2007-08-07 Thread Kenney Westerhof
ccess this information to avoid duplicate resolution. [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/shared/trunk/maven-dependency-tree [2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/trunk/maven-project-info-reports-plugin -- Kenney Jan Van Besien wrote: Hi all I'm currently developping a maven p

Re: it0088 broken

2007-07-30 Thread Kenney Westerhof
#x27;t appear on 2.1 due to me breaking a hack. Anyway, it all works fine now (but we still need to allow any pom in any location to be used as the main pom without this bug reappearing). -- Kenney John Casey wrote: IIRC, path resolution was taking place in the project builder...which

Re: Resource filtering thoughts...

2007-07-10 Thread Kenney Westerhof
at 12:55 PM, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Daniel Kulp wrote: Personally, I was thinking of just doing $$ -> $. Yah, that's already in place for plugin parameters. Thus, if you want ${pom.version} outputted, it would be $${pom.version}. I think @@ also needs to be done. Yup. My origina

Re: Version ranges and snapshots

2007-07-10 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Max Bowsher wrote: Kenney Westerhof wrote: Patrick Schneider wrote: For now, I'm a fan of disallowing snapshots when they are not explicitly in the boundary, as per the patch. In my mind, the problem with a profile flag is that it's an all-or-nothing proposition. Any released

Re: Version ranges and snapshots

2007-07-10 Thread Kenney Westerhof
snapshot repo's and valid snapshot artifacts there determine wheter snapshots are used or not. -- Kenney Patrick On 7/6/07, Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Whilst attempting to fix MNG-2994, I discovered MNG-3092 that was contrary to the 2.0 design docs: http://jira.code

Re: Resource filtering thoughts...

2007-07-10 Thread Kenney Westerhof
@@ -> @@ (or @?) @@foo@ -> @foo@ (or @@foo@@ -> @foo@ ?) @foo@ -> value_of_foo @foo@@ -> value_of_foo@, or @foo@, or @foo@@ ? Maybe it's better if we leave the @foo@ interpretation as-is. ;) -- Kenney Dan On Tuesday 10 July 2007 12:05, John Casey wrote: Yeah, escaping

Re: [VOTE] Configure IDE plugins to download sources by default within Maven projects

2007-07-10 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Brian E. Fox wrote: So I propose: - if -DdownloadSources is specified, download sources and fallback to javadoc, just as it is now - if -DdownloadJavaDoc is specified, download javadoc (possibly fallback to sources) - if both are specified, download both. And: - don't make this a def

Re: Proposal: Required declaration of properties in pom.xml

2007-07-10 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Use German locale This is rather verbose. Do you really want to list all locales in this case? Of course, Maven should display an error if a required variable is missing. And it would be nice to have "help:describe-properties"... -- Kenney

Re: [VOTE] Configure IDE plugins to download sources by default within Maven projects

2007-07-10 Thread Kenney Westerhof
vadoc (possibly fallback to sources) - if both are specified, download both. And: - don't make this a default; the default behaviour of attaching either source or javadoc when it's present in the local repo is fine though, but turning this on by default is just too slow. -- Kenney Mark Ho

Re: Resource filtering thoughts...

2007-07-10 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Daniel Kulp wrote: On Monday 09 July 2007 19:08, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Daniel Kulp wrote: On Monday 09 July 2007 14:42, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Daniel Kulp wrote: Yep. That's the #1 issue.I've completely given up on trying to get the string "${pom.version}" out

Re: Resource filtering thoughts...

2007-07-09 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Daniel Kulp wrote: On Monday 09 July 2007 14:42, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Daniel Kulp wrote: After battling with the braindead resource filtering once again for the ump-teenth time, I've decided I need to do something about it You dissin' my code huh? :) The main thing I&#x

Re: Resource filtering thoughts...

2007-07-09 Thread Kenney Westerhof
for it. Maybe we should just add again to dependencies and resource sets, so the resource plugin can look at the resourceset property 'filterType' or something, if it's set. Either way, changes to the model won't happen until 2.1. So, what's the problem with the filterin

Wagon-webdav

2007-07-08 Thread Kenney Westerhof
der to use the fixed wagon-webdav. WDYT? -- Kenney - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: finding maven.home in the invoker

2007-07-08 Thread Kenney Westerhof
assworlds.conf=${M2_HOME}/bin/m2.conf" \ "-Dmaven.home=${M2_HOME}" \ ${CLASSWORLDS_LAUNCHER} $QUOTED_ARGS so ideally the maven.home property should just work. I don't know why it doesn't, but maybe we should look into that as maven just provides this information since

Re: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4

2007-07-04 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Final update: I checked out the tag cleanly, ran another build and it passed fine. The build took 9 mins 37 seconds. Ridiculous, but: +1 Kenney Westerhof wrote: Update: It seems i was impatient, it took almost 3 minutes to run that single test. After that it continued (on 2.0.7), but I got a

Re: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4

2007-07-04 Thread Kenney Westerhof
gin.DefaultPluginManager.getConfiguredMojo(DefaultPluginManager.java:562) ... 18 more [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 9 seconds btw, tests take about 7 minutes whereas bootstrapping maven itself takes only 3 minutes. my -1 stands, unless I'm the only one where this fails. -- Kenney Kenney W

Re: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4

2007-07-04 Thread Kenney Westerhof
-trunks/plugins/maven-eclipse-plugin/target/test-classes/m2repo and it indefinitely hangs at this point, no cpu load. Tested with maven 2.1 and 2.0.7. Otherwise the plugin works great. -- Kenney Brian E. Fox wrote: It's been about 5 months since an eclipse plugin release and we have lots of

Re: invoker test failure

2007-07-04 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Try again, I just committed a fix. -- Kenney Brian E. Fox wrote: I'm getting an error building the 2.0.7-snapshot invoker: Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 11.861 sec <<< FAILURE! testBuildShouldFail(org.apache.maven.shared.invoker.DefaultInv

Re: [VOTE] Configure IDE plugins to download sources by default within Maven projects

2007-07-04 Thread Kenney Westerhof
javadocs if you want that), which can take a few hours to do on a reasonably sized project. If you really need to, or want to, make a profile in settings.xml or config in a root pom. -- Kenney Some developpers might prefer to have javadoc linked, some sources linked and some both. Should

Re: [m2] Conflict resolvers

2007-06-29 Thread Kenney Westerhof
e either.. I'm just afraid we'll pollute the pom too much with all kinds of tags for this and that; something more generic may be more future proof and have less changes to the pom. -- Kenney Mark Hobson wrote: On 28/06/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As long as you

Re: Contextualizable implemented, but not invoked

2007-06-27 Thread Kenney Westerhof
27;ll find it prints 'extensions' or similar. So it looks like the filtering isn't applied to the extensions, only to plugins.. -- Kenney Jochen Wiedmann wrote: More info: I cannot reproduce the problem with another Mojo, w

Re: Question regarding 2.1 Versioning

2007-06-27 Thread Kenney Westerhof
hat are the problems you're experiencing atm. using maven's built-in versioning? There's still some work to be done here. The solutions specified there are not implemented yet, and won't be until 2.1. -- Kenney

Re: Contextualizable implemented, but not invoked

2007-06-26 Thread Kenney Westerhof
( "XXX " + Contextualizable.class + ": " + Contextualizable.class.getClassLoader() ); } to your mojo and see what it prints? -- Kenney Thanks, Jochen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additiona

Re: [m2] Conflict resolvers

2007-06-25 Thread Kenney Westerhof
ou still get the older one, so, what version you'll get will depend on where you build (how big the reactor is). -- Kenney This is basically our situation and why we need a more intuitive conflict resolver than nearest-wins. You can see that the concept of nearness becomes more and more ar

Re: Encoding issues for 2.0.8

2007-06-23 Thread Kenney Westerhof
api's for this, since they're designed for it: javax.xml.transform.Source and implementations (StreamSource comes to mind). -- Kenney regards, Hervé On 23/06/2007, at 5:29 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: Le vendredi 22 juin 2007, Arnaud HERITIER a écrit : Be careful, because when you read

Re: Surefire report failure.

2007-06-22 Thread Kenney Westerhof
d you mean the snapshot repository? If so, what's broken there? -- Kenney Ole-Martin Mørk wrote: I am having the same problem. Just appeared today out of blue.. What has happened with the surefire plugins lately? It seems like people are deploying a lot of broken surefire artifacts

Re: .isSnapshot changes version

2007-06-22 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: Le mercredi 20 juin 2007, Kenney Westerhof a écrit : Also see https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/surefire/trunk/maven-surefire-plugin /src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/surefire/SurefirePlugin.java line 494. I tried to fix this a while back but it's a big

Re: Sequence of events to ramping up Maven 2.1

2007-06-22 Thread Kenney Westerhof
ts in the proper scope. Either there are duplicate children, or they are referred to by seveal pages (the pages listed by the 'children' feature refer to 'top level' documents...?) -- Kenney - To unsubscribe, e-

Re: Encoding issues for 2.0.8

2007-06-22 Thread Kenney Westerhof
ork. Anyway, I once tried to fix this issue but the api had to be changed and there were just too many changes across plexus and maven at the time to push this through. -- Kenney Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: Le jeudi 21 juin 2007, Jason van Zyl a écrit : It seems like there are many problems with enc

Re: [m2] Conflict resolvers

2007-06-22 Thread Kenney Westerhof
hen and we've got a place reserved for this in the wiki, but there are too much options to choose from to really write something ;) -- Kenney [snip] Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional command

Re: .isSnapshot changes version

2007-06-20 Thread Kenney Westerhof
keyword, version is the one containing the timestamp-buildernumber IIRC. -- Kenney Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: Le mercredi 20 juin 2007, Brian E. Fox a écrit : I discovered http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2961 while working on mdep a while back. same for me while working on http://jira.codehaus.org

Re: what mailing list does jira notify on? I cannot remember.

2007-06-19 Thread Kenney Westerhof
John Casey wrote: Sorry, I just realized that in my recent email shuffling, I lost one of the mailing lists. Which one does JIRA send notifications on? Is there a list of the maven MLs somewhere? -j [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Kenney

Re: DefaultArtifactCollector event change

2007-06-19 Thread Kenney Westerhof
ay just need to add another processing step after it that implements the spec. Whenever we change/improve the spec, it'll be an easy adjustment since it's not hardcoded in the dep resoluion, and we can simply apply different strategies for diff

Re: Expression evaluation

2007-06-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Jason van Zyl wrote: On 16 Jun 07, at 9:57 AM 16 Jun 07, Kenney Westerhof wrote: So before I write something down that's more to the point than an enumeration of the flaws in the current implementation and the problems it gives us, I'd like to get concensus about the proper wa

Re: Expression evaluation

2007-06-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Jason van Zyl wrote: On 16 Jun 07, at 1:18 AM 16 Jun 07, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Hi, where's the spec for this? I'm working on MNG-2651 and similar, and I'm a bit at a loss as how to proceed. What does the 'env.' prefix do? System props, env props, or project

Re: depMgt (mng-1577 again....)

2007-06-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Ralph Goers wrote: Kenney Westerhof wrote: This somewhat describes the situation: - depMgt for artifact X is used to provide defaults for direct dependencies of artifact X, and for overrides of transitive dependencies on X, unless there's also a direct dependency on X in which cas

Re: depMgt (mng-1577 again....)

2007-06-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Jörg Schaible wrote: Kenney Westerhof wrote: Hi, Just did some test wrt MNG-2340 (using maven 2.0.7 and 2.0.6), and this is what I found: P with dependencyManagement for lucene 1.3 | + my-dep with dependency on lucene 1.4.3 + my-app with dependency on my-dep (I modified the attached

Re: depMgt (mng-1577 again....)

2007-06-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
we need a new element, like 'transitiveDependencyManagement'. This is something I hope we won't support in 2.1... -- Kenney -Original Message- From: Kenney Westerhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 7:06 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: depM

depMgt (mng-1577 again....)

2007-06-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
ild overrides' that's globally present in all of maven, so that dependencies can override depMgt, as is the case now, and also apply that to transitive deps, OR we let depMgt override both local and transitive deps. Or, is this the

Expression evaluation

2007-06-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
repo's I've seen mentioned in the code still work. But the order of checking would be changed (for pom.* and project.*) so results may vary. It basically comes down to: we have these pom.*, project.* and env.* prefixes, but they aren'

Re: maven-dependency-tree changes for 1.1

2007-06-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
be moved into maven-components? The help:dependencies goal shows a tree of dependencies, and it didn't work too well because the algorithm used there didn't match the internal algorithm from maven itself, so the report was quite useless. Is this an attempt to fix that? -- Kenney Mark

Re: Deployed attached snapshot artifacts have version number one higher than expected.

2007-06-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
try this approach and it still creates the wrong timestamp/buildnumber then you've found a bug. -- Kenney Mark Donszelmann wrote: Hi I am attaching artifacts to the main (jar) artifact in my plugin for maven. All works fine for versioned plugins, but for SNAPSHOTS I see the following behav

Re: Adding wildcards to IncludesArtifactFilter

2007-06-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
tifactMatcher system... Cheers, Kenney Cheers, Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To

Re: svn commit: r547483 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-dependency-plugin: ./ src/test/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/dependency/ src/test/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/dependency/testUtils/ src/test/jav

2007-06-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
eased. Putting it in a parent or root pom will promote use of snapshots. my 2 cents, Kenney Mark Hobson wrote: On 15/06/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Author: brianf Date: Thu Jun 14 18:50:14 2007 New Revision: 547483 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&

Re: JIRA Smackdown

2007-06-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
it doesn't slip my mind, than to not do it at all because of the high overhead. wdyt? -- Kenney Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, The 2.0.7 release will go out tomorrow, and in order to get some decent vote feedback it would be good to clean up JIRA so that we have an accurate 2.0.x list peop

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.7

2007-06-13 Thread Kenney Westerhof
out, why is it downloaded... Anyway, I'm revoking my -1 and changing it to +1, though not being able to deploy p-c-d or p-u is a serious drawback. But i guess it doesn't matter as 2.0.6 has the same problems so it's not worse ;) -- Kenney - Brett On 14/06/2007, at 2:32 AM, Kenney We

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.7

2007-06-13 Thread Kenney Westerhof
we are going to have a problem. So if you can do a quick check using the snapshot of surefire then we can work from there to make them work together. Kenney can help you track it down and we'll fix the problem. If necessary we'll try to accelerate the release of Surefire and get

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.7

2007-06-13 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Jason van Zyl wrote: tentative -1 for releasing as is: I found a serious bug in maven 2.0.6 and 2.0.7 (2.0.5 works fine): mvn clean deploy on plexus-utils fails (stacktrace and output below) due to a NoClassDefFound on IOUtil in plexus-utils. I'm using released versions of wagon and the depl

Re: AW: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.7 - surefire problem

2007-06-13 Thread Kenney Westerhof
that's due to maven-2.0.7. It seems the test phase always requires the junit dependency (I don't call it explicitly in the POM). Cheers, Frank -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Kenney Westerhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2007 17:13 An: Maven Deve

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.7 - surefire problem

2007-06-13 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Mark Donszelmann wrote: Hi Kenney, Hi Mark, I was using 2.1.3 for surefire. Changed it to 2.3, and still get error (slightly different): Hi, this is fixed later on; i think you're missing a dependency on junit. Let me know if this is the case. Can't be due to 2.0.7 thou

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.7 - surefire problem

2007-06-13 Thread Kenney Westerhof
determine wheter it's a fault in surefire or in maven 2.0.7? Thanks, Kenney Mark Donszelmann wrote: Hi tried 2.0.7 on FreeHEP, seems to work on most parts, except it tells me following in one case: RUN ABORTED java.lang.LinkageError org.apache.maven.surefire.Runner An exception or

Re: [m2] Artifact filtering in DefaultArtifactCollector

2007-06-13 Thread Kenney Westerhof
an "don't include this artifact AND it's dependencies anywhere in the transitive dependency trails", then filtering can occur before resolution. btw, which one is it? I need to doc that in the wiki [1]. Cheers, Kenney [1] http://doc

Re: Problems with release:prepare

2007-06-12 Thread Kenney Westerhof
'svn info' and look at the URL and see if it matches svn://server001/trunk/product. -- Kenney Regards, Graham -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addit

Re: Idea for enhancement

2007-06-09 Thread Kenney Westerhof
java+dotnet in 1 module is just bad practice - they have to very distinct packagings and cannot even have compile-time dependencies AFAIK. src/java/ src/dotnet/ could become src/main/java src/main/dotnet or even src/m1/main/java/ src/m2/main/dotnet/ or m1/src/main/java m2/src/main/dotnet,

Re: When There's No More Room In Jiragoon, The Closed Will Walk Among Us: Dawn of the MNG-1577!

2007-06-09 Thread Kenney Westerhof
ve up to the spec; it cannot be the spec itself. Tests can contain bugs too, or don't test all cases. Writing good tests is the hardest part in software developement processes, apart from writing a good specification. -- Kenney Arnaud On 07/06/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

Re: When There's No More Room In Jiragoon, The Closed Will Walk Among Us: Dawn of the MNG-1577!

2007-06-07 Thread Kenney Westerhof
oposal' simply means the stuff I wrote down - it's probably already implemented, or somebody else already thought of this solution - I don't mean to offend anybody by calling it that). Thanks, Kenney Jason van Zyl wrote: On 7 Jun 07, at 8:01 AM 7 Jun 07, Kenney Wester

Re: When There's No More Room In Jiragoon, The Closed Will Walk Among Us: Dawn of the MNG-1577!

2007-06-07 Thread Kenney Westerhof
I wanted to get some feedback first, flesh it out on the dev list and then jot it down. Need some feedback as to how it's supposed to work now and what we want. If there's no response within a reasonable amount of time I'll just put it in the wiki. Thanks, Kenney Jason van

Re: svn commit: r544891 - /maven/components/branches/maven-2.0.x/pom.xml

2007-06-06 Thread Kenney Westerhof
ks, 2.3 is fine for maven core apparently. Not sure about the IT's though, but I'm sure continuum will tell us. -- Kenney Vincent Siveton wrote: Thanks! Vincent 2007/6/6, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi Vincent, I'm aware of that (the snapshot plugin repo probabl

Re: svn commit: r544891 - /maven/components/branches/maven-2.0.x/pom.xml

2007-06-06 Thread Kenney Westerhof
I deployed all of it way before I committed this. Continuum shouldn't complain ;) Maybe we need to add some pluginrepo somewhere? It'd be temporarily, i've got a feeling 2.3.1 will be released asap as it contains major bugfixes. I just couldn't build it with 2.2. -- Ken

Re: When There's No More Room In Jiragoon, The Closed Will Walk Among Us: Dawn of the MNG-1577!

2007-06-06 Thread Kenney Westerhof
it at least conforms to one of the 8 possible rulesets above). 3) What do we want it to be? 4) do we want this user configurable? 5) do we want an extra choice/rule, that depMgt only takes precedence if there's also a direct dependency declared? 6) Did I miss anything else? Thanks for r

bugfix update

2007-06-06 Thread Kenney Westerhof
blems, please let me know. Cheers, Kenney

Re: Surefire (Fwd: NoSuchMethodError with surefire-booter-2.3.1-20070606.032942-4)

2007-06-06 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Hi, I just found and fixed the bug after doing some testing of all possible config values for 2.3.1-snap and 2.4-snap. fix is in svn, i redeployed surefirebooter for 2.4 and 2.3.1, so everything should be peachy now. Turns out the '!' character was missing somewhere ;) -- Kenney

Re: Surefire (Fwd: NoSuchMethodError with surefire-booter-2.3.1-20070606.032942-4)

2007-06-06 Thread Kenney Westerhof
I'm on top of it, thanks for the pointer. I think someone deployed the booter and not the plugin or vice versa. just redeployed 2.3.1-snappy -- Kenney Jason van Zyl wrote: Just making sure Kenney and Brett see this as I'm currently trying to find a problem with surefire and 2.0.7

Re: Plugin parameter missing

2007-06-03 Thread Kenney Westerhof
quot;${ws.config.dir}" default-value="${was.home}/config" */ protected String wsConfigDir Everything is okay. DEBUG (f) wasConfigDir = XYZ Is root is a reserved parameter name? Nope, see typo above. -- Kenney TIA ---

Re: [jira] Closed: (MNG-2203) Problem with duplicates

2007-06-03 Thread Kenney Westerhof
I agree, this is definitely an issue. If you specify the same dep (a:a) twice in the same pom, maven doesn't say anything, but takes the last one. Brett Porter wrote: Is this still an issue though? Maybe it should be left open for a simpler fix. - Brett On 01/06/2007, at 2:19 PM, Jason van Zy

Re: Archetype packaging

2007-05-30 Thread Kenney Westerhof
t, then n/m the above, just wanted to pitch this in since it's been on my mind for a while now. -- Kenney Raphaël Piéroni wrote: Hi if i would create a new packaging for archetypes, what is the way (i don't need doco link about lifecycle hook of a mojo, i already know it ;) ) to

Re: {SPAM 4.4} Maven 2.0.4 Checkout tag

2007-04-01 Thread Kenney Westerhof
use svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/tags/maven-2.0.4 and fix your smtp server ;) Peter Anning wrote: Spam detection software, running on the system "fire.homenet.neonics.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attach

Re: MNG-2433

2007-03-19 Thread Kenney Westerhof
I know that legacy repositories keep getting pinged on each build, even if they're just updated. Is there also no network traffic when legacy repo's are in the repo list? -- Kenney Brett Porter wrote: On 19/03/2007, at 11:36 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Yah, I saw the logging which is

Re: Relocations for existing artifacts in the repo

2007-03-17 Thread Kenney Westerhof
he downside is that this breaks old builds, but they probably all have fixed versions anyway. Adding a parameter/argument/sysprop to override this would at least let people be aware that there can be unexpected results. tough one ;) -- Kenney Fabrizio Giustina wrote: Hi, I would like to sta

Re: [vote] MNG-1577 as the default behavior

2007-03-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
a bug also changes behaviour. Third option: keep 2.0.x buggy and only apply to 2.1. Fourth option: apply to both 2.0.x and 2.1. My vote goes to 4, after ofcourse we've tested a release candidate of 2.0.6. -- Kenney fabrizio On 3/16/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, A

Re: [vote] MNG-1577 as the default behavior

2007-03-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Carlos Sanchez wrote: On 3/16/07, Kenney Westerhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Carlos Sanchez wrote: > now poms in the repo that have dependencyManagement sections will > start to change the behavior of current builds and people with 2.0.5 > will get very different results t

Re: [vote] MNG-1577 as the default behavior

2007-03-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
ablished that this bugfix is something we want and it should go in 2.1, 2.2 etc. So why try to support the unpredictable behaviour in 2.0.x? I simply cannot understand how we can make 2.0.6 or newer behave in the same unpredictable way (the case where the dependency is NOT specified to override the d

Re: [vote] MNG-1577 as the default behavior

2007-03-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
s against 'real life' complex builds. The best way to do that I think is to apply it to 2.0.x and let people test it on their builds for a while. If it's breaking more than it fixes we can always roll back before the release. -- Kenney Brett Porter wrote: -1, at this point. I'd

Re: forceVersion for maven-install-plugin?

2007-03-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
plugin) is of use; it temporarily installs the plugin in the local repository, backing up what's there; after the integration test, it restores the local repository. Jason Dillon wrote: On Mar 15, 2007, at 2:38 AM, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Jason Dillon wrote: How does a test repository help?

Re: maven-metadata.xml in version level repository directory?

2007-03-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
It's only available in snapshot version directories and contains a list of all the snapshot versions there and names the latest version. So it's useful for snapshots. Ole Ersoy wrote: Hi, Just wondering if there is a purpose to having maven-metadata.xml in the version directories (The direct

Re: version range question

2007-03-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
t doing this breaks other unit tests. I'll make an IT test and see what happens just patching the contains method. -Original Message- From: Kenney Westerhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 9:18 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: version range quest

Re: version range question

2007-03-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
not there in 1.0. Then maven _should_ use FOO 1.0 for A, B and C, causing C not to compile, if your patch is applied. Otherwise, the patch isn't good enough probably becuase there's other code that does not honor 2.0.5 NOT being in 2.0.6... -- Kenney It's easy to tweak my patch so

Re: Test failures in maven-source-plugin

2007-03-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
to work on the WAR plugin but I want more tests before changing anything. MNG-2677 -- Kenney Stéphane On 3/14/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/14/07, Kenney Westerhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem is that it uses the Verifier to test. > The Verif

Re: version range question

2007-03-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
know that's what people *think* X means, but it doesn't. I'm not sure if we can change this - a lot of builds will fail, though it'll certainly meet expectations better. -- Kenney public void testContains() throws InvalidVersionSpecificationException { Arti

Re: Test failures in maven-source-plugin

2007-03-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Wendy Smoak wrote: On 3/14/07, Kenney Westerhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The problem is that it uses the Verifier to test. The Verifier uses the plugin from the local repo, not the current project. First, mvn clean install -Dmaven.test.skip=true, then mvn test and it'll work

Re: version range question

2007-03-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
insVersion( new DefaultArtifactVersion("2.0.6") ) is true since 2.0.6 is in [2.0.5,). Or am I missing something here? -- Kenney Brian E. Fox wrote: Done. I fixed the problem and added the tests to a branch described here: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2876 Since it's very core (or may

Re: forceVersion for maven-install-plugin?

2007-03-15 Thread Kenney Westerhof
When MNG-870 was resolved (which later regressed), I succesfully ran integration tests on the current artifact with the maven-it-plugin, so I think the easiest and best solution here is to just fix MNG-2677. -- Kenney Specifically what I mean is to add an execution of the maven-install-plugin:inst

Re: maven code style - eclipse

2007-03-14 Thread Kenney Westerhof
rsion so you'll know what to patch. -- Kenney -D On 3/13/07, Kenney Westerhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dan Tran wrote: > http://maven.apache.org/developers/maven-eclipse-codestyle.xml > > seems to be out of date ( the throws, extend, etc do not split ) > >

Re: Test failures in maven-source-plugin

2007-03-14 Thread Kenney Westerhof
because of this. -- Kenney Jason van Zyl wrote: On 13 Mar 07, at 1:30 AM 13 Mar 07, Stephane Nicoll wrote: Weird. Can you paste the surefire logs please? I believe they are caused by the testing harness. I too get failures but have been using it to make the embedder source jar for 10 bundle

Re: ApacheCon?

2007-03-14 Thread Kenney Westerhof
I'l be there - it's in my country so how can I not go? :) I'm looking forward to meeting you in person (and others ofcourse). -- Kenney Brett Porter wrote: Hi, Who here will be at ApacheCon in May? I know Jason is as he is speaking. Anyone want to get together there? I'

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >