(I use the --prefix so that the generated libraries during the make install
step won't "pollute" my system's /usr/local/bin).
You'll miss the build of the Java/Python protobuf, and probably other
stuff, but it's usually good enough to experiment with C++ frameworks,
features, etc.
YMMV
--
*Mar
Thanks, Kapil!
--
*Marco Massenzio*
http://codetrips.com
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Kapil Arya <ka...@mesosphere.io> wrote:
> It hasn't been removed, but was moved around a bit:
> https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/src/master/main.cpp#L334
>
>
>
> On
missed the memo - sorry about that!)
Thanks in advance for any help.
--
*Marco Massenzio*
http://codetrips.com
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 12:22 PM, José Guilherme Vanz <
guilherme@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm very new in the community and I do not know all the issues the
> community already faced. My advance apologies if I'm saying bullshit...
>
> If is always difficult to find I shepherd, change the approach
have been useful, and fun to fix).
--
*Marco Massenzio*
http://codetrips.com
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 9:24 PM, haosdent <haosd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh, @Marco. Thank you very much for your reply, vinodkone shepherd this
> and it have already submitted after other kindly
/browse/MESOS-3841)
--
*Marco Massenzio*
http://codetrips.com
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:34 AM, haosdent <haosd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We intend to introduce a breaking change[1] in the http endpoints without
> the deprecation cycle.
> For below http endpoin
by and large, greatly usable - and
beats Eclipse CDT any day).
Also, please let me know whether there's anything you'd like me to try out
and report back.
Thanks!
--
*Marco Massenzio*
http://codetrips.com
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Alex Clemmer <clemmer.alexan...@gmail.com>
wrote:
+10 for consistency
+1 for hyphens (less carpal-tunnel :)
--
*Marco Massenzio*
http://codetrips.com
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Michael Park <mp...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 for consistency, +1 for hyphens for executables.
>
> On 11 February 2016 at 14:25, Kevin Klues <
[1] https://github.com/3rdparty/libprocess
--
*Marco Massenzio*
http://codetrips.com
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Kapil Arya <ka...@mesosphere.io> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> TLDR: Move everything from 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/* into 3rdparty/.
> (Optionally) Move libproces
s of the libraries, if I
so wish.
--
*Marco Massenzio*
http://codetrips.com
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 10:39 PM, haosdent <haosd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "make install" have to use sudo.
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Abhishek Dasgupta <
> a10gu...@linux.vnet.ibm.c
Hello, folks.
Now that 0.27 is out of the way, I'm wondering whether I could ping (again)
about this Issue[1] and the associated code review[2] - also, in the spirit
of recent emails, comments from "more experienced contributors" would be
much appreciated too.
Thanks!
--
*Marco Masse
ust go `vim .gitignore`) will add those
> > changes
> > (unwittingly) to `support/gitignore` - changes that will end up in the
> > patch.
> >
> > I would recommend we add appropriate documentation in the "getting
> started"
> > or "contribu
Thanks, buddy - I keep forgetting that one!
(one assumes --all would, well, take care of that too :)
Have a great weekend!
--
*Marco Massenzio*
http://codetrips.com
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Vinod Kone <vinodk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Git fetch --tags
>
> @vinodkone
>
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Marco Massenzio <m.massen...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Is there a 0.27.0-rc2 branch cut?
>
> $ git fetch --all
> Fetching origin
>
> $ git co 0.27.0-rc2
> error: pathspec '0.27.0-rc2' did not match any file(s) known to git.
>
> well, or
Is there a 0.27.0-rc2 branch cut?
$ git fetch --all
Fetching origin
$ git co 0.27.0-rc2
error: pathspec '0.27.0-rc2' did not match any file(s) known to git.
--
*Marco Massenzio*
http://codetrips.com
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:12 PM, Michael Park <mp...@apache.org> wrote:
&g
;contributing to mesos" guides, as this may catch folks new to the
project off-guard.
>
>
> On 20 January 2016 at 21:02, Marco Massenzio <m.massen...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 for consistency
>>
>> Just a quick note to point out that if you _syml
t;SLA" on the
Shepherd's part of looking at the code within a reasonable timeframe of the
review posted? Or at least, an agreed timeline?
Also, I'm quite curious to know what are the criteria for choosing which
projects/Jiras are prioritized for shepherding?
Thanks!
--
*Marco Massenzio*
http://cod
?
(and, yes, using a global ~/.gitignore is a great strategy, but there may
be cases in which it may not be possible/desirable)
I'm easy either way and don't mind whichever we choose; just pointing out a
possible issue.
--
*Marco Massenzio*
http://codetrips.com
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:20 PM
recently been through this, so memory is still fresh.
My 2c.
--
*Marco Massenzio*
http://codetrips.com
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Kapil Arya <ka...@mesosphere.io> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:58 PM, James Peach <jor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Jan
to chime in).
Thanks for getting the conversation started!
--
*Marco Massenzio*
http://codetrips.com
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Alex Rukletsov <a...@mesosphere.com>
wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I would like to gather your opinions about a concern related to operator
> HTTP endpoints
ethod with "too much
information."
We can probably add more (I was thinking a pointer to the just-created
instance of the 'Master' or 'Slave' class, may come in handy?) so I'll be
looking forward to hear what folks have to suggest.
Thanks!
--
*Marco Massenzio*
http://codetrips.com
On
+1
(my two cent is that the “correct” approach from an operations viewpoint is to
first query for the leader, then ask the leader; shortcoming identified by Ben
obvious, but possibly the lesser of the two evils - and probably unavoidable in
a distributed systems without atomic transactions -
Hey folks,
any takers?
I'd really like to have an initial conversation about MESOS-4253, anyone
willing to shepherd this one?
Many thanks!
--
*Marco Massenzio*
http://codetrips.com
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Marco Massenzio <m.massen...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Happy New Year,
`finalize()` method too (again, there is a TODO
about this as well).
(I think we should, but can be convinced otherwise)
Thanks in advance!
[0] https://github.com/massenz/execute-module
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4253
[2] https://reviews.apache.org/r/41760/
--
*Marco Massenzio*
http://codetrips.com
IIRC don't "import" it, just "open" the folder.
I may be wrong there - I'll give it another shot on a "clean" Mac and let
you know what I find.
--
*Marco Massenzio*
Distributed Systems Engineer
http://codetrips.com
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Shiyao Ma <
tion, auto-completion, etc. work just fine.
--
*Marco Massenzio*
Distributed Systems Engineer
http://codetrips.com
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Alex Clemmer <clemmer.alexan...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> CMake support is not quite mature yet. I think we're at least a couple
> months
,
retrying
That is the default value, but maybe your setup may need longer than that
(it is possible that the time it takes for all master nodes to come up and
reach quorum may be the issue).
--
*Marco Massenzio*
Distributed Systems Engineer
http://codetrips.com
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 3:06 AM, Guilherme Moro &l
rom it.
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Tomek Janiszewski <jani...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > It looks simple for the first sight. Marco, I can work on it.
> > >
> > > -
> > > Tomek
&g
) the supervisor will restart it (as the case may be, with
the new configuration).
Maybe that is the best paradigm then. Use HA setup with Zookeeper and
roll config to one master, restart, wash, rinse, repeat?
yup!
look, ma', no downtime :)
--
*Marco Massenzio*
Distributed Systems Engineer
http
, we would also gain the ability to have more intuitive
syntax; grouping flags by function; and make it extensible.
Any takers who may want to work together on this one?
--
*Marco Massenzio*
Distributed Systems Engineer
http://codetrips.com
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Vinod Kone <vinodk...@gmai
that #2 has been really an issue so far (but, yes,
of course, it might in the future).
Hence,
+1
in providing tooling to make cluster upgrades easier to automate.
Thanks!
--
*Marco Massenzio*
Distributed Systems Engineer
http://codetrips.com
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Neil Conway <neil.
Accepted%20and%20assignee%20is%20EMPTY
--
*Marco Massenzio*
Distributed Systems Engineer
http://codetrips.com
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Bechstein, Felix <felix.bechst...@otto.de>
wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to work on MESOS-3307 "Configurable size of completed task /
>
g the Jira to the TODO will add
much value (in fact, it may make our backlog even more "noisy" than it
currently is) but I am willing to experiment with this and see how it goes.
--
*Marco Massenzio*
Distributed Systems Engineer
http://codetrips.com
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 8:4
Awesome!
Thanks, Klaus Ma and Michael!
--
*Marco Massenzio*
Distributed Systems Engineer
http://codetrips.com
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Michael Park <mcyp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is an announcement that we have changed *JSON::Protobuf* to
> *JSON::pro
ith Alex's
exhortation to have "excellent core error reporting facilities," I would
also like to propose that we consider adopting a pattern I've seen
elsewhere:
if (errorOccurred) {
string msg = "Dude, something went wrong!";
LOG(ERROR) << msg;
return Error(msg);
}
awesome.
Random Fact - contrary to what one may think, "project = Mesos and status
was Resolved DURING("2015-10-09", now())" does not do what you think it
should...
--
*Marco Massenzio*
Distributed Systems Engineer
http://codetrips.com
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Bernd
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Neil Conway <neil.con...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Marco Massenzio <ma...@mesosphere.io>
> wrote:
> > So, in addition to what Michael suggests, and in line with Alex's
> > exhortation to
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Neil Conway <neil.con...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Marco Massenzio <ma...@mesosphere.io>
> wrote:
> > I may be wrong here, but adding (filename, line_nr) to the Error() object
> > is performance-impa
instead be released independently (ideally, following the Apache 2
license framework) - if that's the case, I'm definitely not an expert, but
there are folks here that would be happy and fully capable to help!
Thanks for doing the work and sharing it: that's awesome.
--
*Marco Massenzio*
Distributed
- unfortunately, Jira's markdown does not support backticks IIRC, but
{{ }} to demarcate 'fixed font' in paragraphs (and {code} or {noformat}
blocks for code snippets).
(RB uses "generally-accepted" markdown, though, so that's good!)
Thanks for raising awareness about this, Greg!
--
*Marco
+1
(and thanks for flagging this!)
--
*Marco Massenzio*
Distributed Systems Engineer
http://codetrips.com
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Joris Van Remoortere <jo...@mesosphere.io>
wrote:
> +1 for (a).
>
>
> —
> *Joris Van Remoortere*
> Mesosphere
>
> On Tue, Oct
Alex - everyone is welcome to join, we usually send an email to this
mailing list a day or two prior to the event with the agenda and a link to
the livestream and the hangout.
I don't think there is "a form" as such (or, if there is one, I don't know
where it is :) ).
--
*Marco
+1 bi-weekly
--
*Marco Massenzio*
Distributed Systems Engineer
http://codetrips.com
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Yong Qiao Wang <yq...@cn.ibm.com> wrote:
> +1 for bi-weekly.
>
> Regards!
>
> Yong Qiao Wang(王勇桥)
>
>
>
> From: Jojy Varghese &
ently wanted to work to
> improve the documentation, and with Dave's shepherding we were able to do
> much more than I expected. I don't think any of us expected the level of
> feedback or the number of votes we got to be one of the winning teams.
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM,
Depending on how sophisticated one wants to get, we could abstract away common
behavior in a class and have the scripts use the functionality.
You know, you can write well-designed OO code in Python too ;-)
Happy to help where I can.
—
Sent from my iPhone, which is not as good as
+1
Dave - great stuff!
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineerhttp://codetrips.com <http://codetrips.com>*
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Dave Lester <d...@davelester.org> wrote:
> As part of the #MesosCon Europe hackathon, my team has been making
> improvements to
+1
Likewise, I think it's awesome, would love to be involved.
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineerhttp://codetrips.com <http://codetrips.com>*
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Neil Conway <neil.con...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Maged Mich
Hi Zameer,
thanks for comments - I'd be happy to help the Aurora team upgrade to
support Mesos 0.24+
I'll follow up on the issue you pointed us to.
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineerhttp://codetrips.com <http://codetrips.com>*
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Zameer Manj
for
non-C++ developers to have to link with libmesos and have to deal with
Protocol Buffers.
An example of how to access the new format in Python can be found in [0]
and we're happy to help with other languages too.
Any questions, please just ask.
[0] http://github.com/massenz/zk-mesos
Marco
/libsvn_delta-1.0.dylib
/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/lib/libsvn_delta-1.dylib
...
(this is where my understanding of homebrew ends, I'm afraid)
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineerhttp://codetrips.com <http://codetrips.com>*
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Vinod Kone &
Thanks, James.
I don't suppose, then, that simply doing:
LD_LIBRARYPATH=/opt/twitter:$LD_LIBRARYPATH
would solve the issue?
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineerhttp://codetrips.com <http://codetrips.com>*
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 7:44 PM, James Peach <jor...@gmail.c
A minor nit...
Please use the "target" version for those you _would like_ to land in 0.25
(with reasonably high degree of certainty by now ;-) hopefully) and "fix
version" only when resolved.
That should make constructing release notes less painstaking.
Thanks!
—
Sent from my
apache/mesos/commit/f9c2604ea97b91f8a9ec3b2863317761679b1c86
> Also, based on the comments, it seems like we should allow 80 column
> comments but omit the sweeping change.
> Thanks,
> MPark.
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 6:13 PM Marco Massenzio <ma...@mesosphere.io> wrote:
>>
/issues/?filter=12333150
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineerhttp://codetrips.com <http://codetrips.com>*
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Vinod Kone <vinodk...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos 0.24.
` and replace the JAR?
(not terribly familiar with our build process, so no idea if that would
work at all).
[0] http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineerhttp://codetrips.com <http://codetrips.com>*
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 4:46 PM,
Use ./bin/mesos-test.sh --verbose
—
Sent from Mailbox
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Klaus Ma wrote:
> Hi team,
> I’m working on MESOS-3070 (Master CHECK failure if a framework uses
> duplicated task id); the fix was passed in Ubuntu 14.04 but failed at Mac OS,
> so is
+1 (non-binding)
All tests (including ROOT) pass on:
Ubuntu 14.04 (physical box)
All non-ROOT tests pass on:
CentOS 7 (VirtualBox VM)
Known issue (MESOS-3050) for ROOT tests on CentOS 7, non-blocker.
Thanks,
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineerhttp://codetrips.com http
+1
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineerhttp://codetrips.com http://codetrips.com*
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Paul Brett pbr...@twitter.com.invalid
wrote:
We are currently using the Google log CHECK macros (CHECK_SOME,
CHECK_NOTNULL etc) in the test harness, usually to verify
Progress!
Gavin fixed this for us and I've verified that it works - so, now
re-opening a Resolved issue, will put it back into a valid Resolution:
Unresolved, and it will correctly show up in the My Open Issues query.
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineer*
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:06
Hi YongQiao,
I've added you to the Contributors list, welcome to Apache Mesos!
Please make sure to sign up to Apache ReviewBoard too.
Looking forward to your contributions!
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineer*
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 11:19 PM, YongQiao Wang jamesyongq...@gmail.com
backlog grooming (Open to
Accepted) becomes too laborious.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Marco Massenzio ma...@mesosphere.io
wrote:
Dear all:
When re-opening an issue (for whatever reason) moving it from its
Resolved
state (to either Open or In progress) Jira will *not* update
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10086
(apparently, I'm not allowed to add Watchers on an INFRA ticket... weird!)
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineer*
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Marco Massenzio ma...@mesosphere.io wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Vinod Kone
Hi Qian,
I've added you to the 'Contributors' group, welcome to Apache Mesos!
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineer*
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Qian AZ Zhang zhang...@cn.ibm.com wrote:
Thanks!
Regards,
*Qian Zhang (张乾)*
Developer, IBM Platform Computing
state makes sense (Open, In Progress, etc.)
Hope this helps!
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineer*
it in the comment).
(there's also a peculiar Jira issue in which the Resolved state doesn't
get cleared once one moves it back in open or in progress and the issue
continues to appear struck out in lists, sprints, backlog, etc. confusing
the obsessives like me :)).
Thanks!
*Marco Massenzio
Hi Jihun,
I've added you to the contributors list, welcome to Mesos!
(and thanks for working on those issues).
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineer*
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Jihun Kang ykr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I recently created and worked on jira issues, MESOS-2216
Great news, indeed!
Thanks, Adam, for all the hard work in driving this release to fruition,
you're a star!
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineer*
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Adam Bordelon a...@mesosphere.io wrote:
Good news, everyone!
The vote for Mesos 0.23.0 (rc4) has
failures and it complains about already existing cgroups hierarchies; so
I'm assuming the earlier test run left the system in an unclean state.
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineer*
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Adam Bordelon a...@mesosphere.io wrote:
+1 (binding) to Mesos 0.23.0
This is really cool!
Eclipse CDT is becoming a bit tiresome to use, but JetLabs' CLion only
support cmake, so I definitely have a stake in this working :)
Please keep us posted on progress, I'll definitely try and give it a spin
on Ubuntu and OSX.
Thanks for doing it!
*Marco Massenzio
FAILED TESTS
YOU HAVE 12 DISABLED TESTS
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineer*
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Marco Massenzio ma...@mesosphere.io
wrote:
Ubuntu 14.04
Not sure if I'm doing something wrong, `sudo make distcheck` fails -
re-running after a `make clean
] PerfTest.ROOT_SamplePid
10 FAILED TESTS
YOU HAVE 12 DISABLED TESTS
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineer*
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Vinod Kone vinodk...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (binding)
Successfully built RPMs for CentOS5 and CentOS6 with network isolator.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 4:56
, and yet, eventually, the whole thing was
dropped...
BTW - the whole idea of this RR was to avoid having the same code, slightly
changed, sprinkled all over the code base (MESOS-2902 needs this too).
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineer*
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Paul Brett pbr
.
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineer*
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Benjamin Mahler benjamin.mah...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey sorry for the frustration, I wrote subprocess originally but it's
evolved over time through a number of folks. Is ben going to shepherd this?
Sweet - I'll
Adam - thanks.
Please let me know soon as you push an rc4, if I'm still home, I can test
it against Ubuntu 14.04 with/without SSL, with/without sudo (or I can
always VPN in :)
Very minor doc update: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36532/
(feel free to ignore).
Thanks, everyone!
*Marco Massenzio
BTW - I concur that we are indeed in agreement ;)
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineer*
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Marco Massenzio ma...@mesosphere.io
wrote:
Hey Ben,
my apologies - I expressed myself incorrectly: what I meant was a generic
you random guy (which I know
to prevent people from contributing documentation... :(
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Marco Massenzio ma...@mesosphere.io
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Benjamin Mahler
benjamin.mah...@gmail.com
wrote:
Let me try to contain the length of this thread, two points don't
of the code.
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Marco Massenzio ma...@mesosphere.io
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Benjamin Mahler
benjamin.mah...@gmail.com
wrote:
A couple of thoughts:
(1) When introducing javadoc comments, can we please keep comment style
consistent
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Benjamin Mahler benjamin.mah...@gmail.com
wrote:
A couple of thoughts:
(1) When introducing javadoc comments, can we please keep comment style
consistent within files and APIs? For the most part, it seems folks are
introducing javadoc in consistent sweeps,
myself!
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineer*
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 1:48 AM, Alex Rukletsov a...@mesosphere.com wrote:
And you're not the only one who were confused by the terminology! One of
the alternatives that didn't make it to the public doc was cluster-wide
dynamic reservations
: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.23.0 (rc1)
+1
2015-07-04 12:32 GMT+08:00 Weitao zhouwtl...@gmail.com:
+1
发自我的 iPhone
在 2015年7月4日,09:41,Marco Massenzio ma...@mesosphere.io 写道:
+1
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineer*
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Adam Bordelon
+1
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineer*
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Adam Bordelon a...@mesosphere.io wrote:
Hello Mesos community,
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos 0.23.0.
0.23.0 includes the following
.
In the meantime, please add the Resolution in a comment for the issue, and
once this gets sorted out, we will manually update them.
Thanks for your patience, folks!
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineer*
Awesome, Jake, thanks!
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineer*
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Vinod Kone vinodk...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Jake!
I also bulk transitioned the erroneously reopened issues back to resolved.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Jake Farrell jfarr
be confusing to most clients.
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineer*
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 9:54 AM, haosdent haosd...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, I got it. I would discuss document this with @adam. Thank you for your
great advice.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:33 AM, James DeFelice james.defel
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Cody Maloney c...@mesosphere.io wrote:
CentOS 5 and 6 don't come out of the box with a new enough version of GCC
to compile Mesos. Already they need to upgrade that to compile Mesos. I
don't see how adding another upgrade when they have to do GCC is overly
custom_headers=mesos,process,stout
set braces_newline
PS - am I the only one to find it hilarious that code that supposedly
checks on style correctness is written in some of the least readable, badly
PEP8-violating Python? :)
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineer*
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 3:18 PM
(which offers a subset
of possible states to transition to) to move Issues across states.
We'll keep you updated on progress.
The INFRA ticket to follow is here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9846
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineer*
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 2:26 PM
/35815/
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineer*
vigilant!
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineer*
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Dave Lester d...@davelester.org wrote:
Hi Anand,
Was there a discussion thread on this?
Breaking changes should only be introduced when the community has had a
chance to discuss its impact and any
against regressions, etc.
I'm happy to remove it from the workflow (assuming Jira allows it) or we
can leave it there.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Marco Massenzio ma...@mesosphere.io
wrote:
Hi Vinod,
thanks for super-quick reply.
We've already been through this in our internal
Thanks, everyone, for your suggestions: quick feedback was much appreciated!
I've updated the Google Doc, I think we're in good shape, I'll wait until
Friday to hear if anyone has still objections, then I'll work with Jake
(thanks for offer to help!) to implement it.
*Marco Massenzio
and move to
accepted state).
+1 removing “reopened as it has no extra value for us
it's history!
Resolving without accepting to me sounds like a shortcut that we might
want to prevent as it could be a bad example?
On Jun 10, 2015, at 12:00 AM, Marco Massenzio ma...@mesosphere.io
wrote
tend
to close issues after we cut a release with them, but it's kind of an extra
step that I'm not convinced we really need to do.
Got rid of Closed.
As both Bens don't like it - I think it was doomed :)
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 2:26 PM Marco Massenzio ma...@mesosphere.io
wrote:
Folks
cut a release with them, but it's kind of an
extra
step that I'm not convinced we really need to do.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 2:26 PM Marco Massenzio ma...@mesosphere.io
wrote:
Folks,
Please take a look at MESOS-2806: in a nutshell, our current workflow is
rather convoluted
Hey Oliver,
thanks for the patch and really glad to hear that Mesos just works for
you!
As you can imagine, we'd love to add Uber to the Powered by page:
http://mesos.apache.org/documentation/latest/powered-by-mesos/
Do you think that would be possible?
Welcome to the club!
*Marco Massenzio
, Marco Massenzio ma...@mesosphere.io
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Benjamin Mahler
benjamin.mah...@gmail.com
wrote:
To go from accepted to open you need to go through in progress?
That part wasn't changed from before?
Anyways, why would you ever want to do
to 'Open' if we
really want to).
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Marco Massenzio ma...@mesosphere.io
wrote:
Thanks, everyone, for your suggestions: quick feedback was much
appreciated!
I've updated the Google Doc, I think we're in good shape, I'll wait until
Friday to hear if anyone has
.
Anyone against it?
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineer*
!
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineer*
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Vinod Kone vinodk...@apache.org wrote:
+jake
Marco, this sounds good to me. Have you looked into see if JIRA allows us
to constrain ourselves to this workflow? If yes, the next step would be to
work with ASF infra
feels strongly that we should keep the
current workflow.
Thanks!
*Marco Massenzio*
*Distributed Systems Engineer*
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Marco Massenzio ma...@mesosphere.io wrote:
Folks,
Please take a look at MESOS-2806: in a nutshell, our current workflow is
rather convoluted and brings
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo