[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-4250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16741833#comment-16741833
]
Simon Geard commented on MYFACES-4250:
--
Unfortunately not. I spent a week or so beating my head
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-4250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16688143#comment-16688143
]
Simon Geard commented on MYFACES-4250:
--
Not easily... it's been three months since I reported
Simon Geard created MYFACES-4250:
Summary: NullPointerException triggered as consequence of
FaceletsCompilerSupport.loadLibraries
Key: MYFACES-4250
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-4250
Simon Kulessa created TRINIDAD-2458:
---
Summary: FrameBusting functionality missing with ProjectStage
Production
Key: TRINIDAD-2458
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2458
Project
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Components
Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.2.10-core, 1.2.1-core
Environment: Windows 7 x64, Internet Explorer 9
Reporter: Simon Durand
The tr:chart component does not render well on IE9 with Adobe SVG
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13010887#comment-13010887
]
Simon Godard edited comment on MYFACES-2979 at 3/24/11 8:09 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13010887#comment-13010887
]
Simon Godard commented on MYFACES-2979:
---
I'm experiencing the same problem
) 2.0.2 -FCS, ExtVal: 2.0.4-SNAPSHOT
Reporter: Simon Zambrovski
I observe a strange exception by that appears inside of the
BeanValidatorWrapper in a very specific scenario. Here is how it goes:
I use PrimeFaces 2.0.2 running on Mojarra JSF and using ExtVal for Bean
Validation
.
Best regards,
Simon Kulessa.
--
Diplom Informatiker Simon Kulessa
FlexSecure GmbH
Industriestr. 12
D - 64297 Darmstadt
Tel: +49 (0) 6151 501 23-15
Fax: +49 (0) 6151 501 23-19
E-Mail:kule...@flexsecure.de
Internet:www.flexsecure.de
Geschäftsführer:
Erwin Stallenberger, Markus Ruppert
Amtsgericht
format)
2. Click 'update'
3. Remove the focus from the inputField
Since it is reproducable in the SandBox I guess it is a known bug / open
issue ?
Best regards,
Simon Kulessa.
--
Diplom Informatiker Simon Kulessa
FlexSecure GmbH
Industriestr. 12
D - 64297 Darmstadt
Tel: +49 (0) 6151 501 23-15
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Bean Validation
Affects Versions: 1.2.4-SNAPSHOT, 2.0.4-SNAPSHOT, 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT
Reporter: Simon Zambrovski
Trying to validate a null-property annotated with @Valid causes an
IllegalArgumentException:
WARNUNG: Validation of a null
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Lessard resolved TRINIDAD-556.
Fix Version/s: 1.2.1-core
1.0.1-core
Resolution: Fixed
Indeed
within the ChangeManager however.
2) How do you detect that change since you need to if you are to notify the
ChangeManager?
Regards,
~ Simon
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Blake Sullivan blake.sulli...@oracle.comwrote:
Simon,
The use case is this:
Say I have a table
anyway.
Regards,
~ Simon
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Michael Kurz michi.k...@gmx.at wrote:
Jakob Korherr schrieb:
Hi Michael,
I guess that is the expected behavior...
Also: isn't this serialize and deserialize behavior the same if you use a
session bean with a reference
() as appropriate. No api
changes and the change is encapsulated in UIXFacesBeanImpl and
UIXComponentBase.
-- Blake Sullivan
\Simon Lessard said the following On 1/6/2010 10:40 AM PT:
Hi Blake,
Yep, that's exactly what I meant. I'm aware that the main risk lies with
compatibility, but I
Looks great, thanks!
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Bruno Aranda brunoara...@gmail.com wrote:
Excellent! Looks fantastic. Something long due to trinidad.
Thanks,
Bruno
2010/1/7 Matt Cooper mcoo...@apache.org
Wow this looks fantastic, nice work!
Thanks,
Matt
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at
Hi Blake,
Yep, that's exactly what I meant. I'm aware that the main risk lies with
compatibility, but I think it's minimal.
Regards,
~ Simon
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Blake Sullivan blake.sulli...@oracle.comwrote:
Simon Lessard said the following On 1/5/2010 2:34 PM PT:
Blake
is if
the component's id actually need to be read in a property getter method in a
renderer which receive only the FacesBean instance and not the component
itself. That would be much faster than a custom ValueExpression and the
memory footprint would also be better.
Regards,
~ Simon
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010
primitive values in their corresponding
wrapper classes). If the property is not writeable, or an attempt is made
to
set a property of primitive type to null, throw
IllegalArgumentException.
Regards,
~ Simon
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Blake Sullivan blake.sulli
defined properties, but all Trinidad applications most likely directly use
FacesBean.getProperty(PropertyKey) directly, like all our renderer do. For
custom properties, there's absolutely no hit.
Regards,
~ Simon
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Blake Sullivan blake.sulli...@oracle.comwrote
Class? type;
public Object get(Object o)
{
return getter.invoke(o);
}
// ...
}
Regards,
~ Simon
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Blake Sullivan blake.sulli...@oracle.comwrote:
Simon,
For part 1), are you proposing that we stop overriding getAttributes()? If
so
Hi,
The context parameter is the way to go, but it might not be working yet in
MyFaces alpha.
~ Simon
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi!
Since RichFaces-3.3.3 is not compatible with the builtin JSF-2.0 facelets 2
version, I need to disable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12792419#action_12792419
]
Simon Kitching commented on MYFACES-1820:
-
Yes, Leonardo's posting shows
,
it's about the only way to interact with JSP. This is sad, make you wish JSP
was never supported for JSF...
~ Simon
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:38 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.orgwrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's going to be JSF
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12792071#action_12792071
]
Simon Kitching commented on MYFACES-1820:
-
For FacesContext subclasses
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12792073#action_12792073
]
Simon Kitching commented on MYFACES-1820:
-
This problem was noticed during
Looks good to me as well. I've got to admit that this ProjectStage thing
seems to get more useful than what I was thinking when I first saw it pop on
the EG list
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.orgwrote:
awesome.
I plan to start development on that next
Hi,
I'm pretty sure this was discussed on the EG list, so yeah it looks like a
hole in the spec and Mojarra being right here.
~ Simon
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Michael Kurz michi.k...@gmx.at wrote:
Hi,
I have recently created a bunch of applications with Mojarra 2.0 that I'm
+1
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Michael Concini mconc...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Bruno Aranda wrote:
+1
2009/11/25 Cagatay Civici cagatay.civ...@gmail.com:
+1
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
wrote:
+1
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:27 PM,
Hi,
Yes I was, and it does seem correctly done too... Who's in charge of calling
the formSubmitted method? Is is an action on a commandLink/Button?
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:56 AM, kpanneersel...@inautix.co.in wrote:
Hi Simon,
Thanks for responding. I'm not quite sure what you mean
Ugh, it should work fine... It looks like the base tag code fail to detect
that the component already exists when rereading the JSP... You use jsp
right? not facelet?
~ Simon
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:17 AM, kpanneersel...@inautix.co.in wrote:
Hi,
The formSubmitted() is an action
Hi,
This is a good explanation. Is it possible for you to test a JSP version? To
be honest, I'm a bit flabbergasted to see something like that happen in
Facelet. Can you check the state of the component's children within the
formSubmitted method?
~ Simon
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:43 AM
absolutely
nothing to do about it except raise the issue to the EG. But, as you
mentioned, the before restore is pretty much impossible since the attribute
is not yet restored.
Regards,
~ Simon
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
While working
on. This kind of separation often make the constant names clearer (no
need to prefix the constant type like ELEMENT_ or ATTR_).
About the general idea to move such constants to the API, I'm +1 though.
Regards,
~ Simon
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote:
Why
+1 for the project stage idea.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Michael Concini mconc...@gmail.comwrote:
What about using project stage to determine which behavior to follow? If
we're in production stage we don't check for best performance, but in
development/test stages we perform the
backed with log4j imho.
Regards,
~ Simon
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Mario Ivankovits ma...@ops.co.at wrote:
+1 for jul
reduces dependencies - and sun also use it, no?
*Von:* Leonardo Uribe [mailto:lu4...@gmail.com]
*Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 01. Oktober 2009 04:06
*An:* MyFaces
the thread could
be a good idea.
Regards,
~ Simon
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Marius Petoi marius.pe...@codebeat.rowrote:
Hello everybody,
You started discussing about making an independent module for skinning,
starting from the skinning in Trinidad (
http://markmail.org/thread
Hi,
I wouldn't mind seeing that part shared.
~ Simon
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Udo Schnurpfeil u...@schnurpfeil.de wrote:
Hi Marius,
it sounds very nice for me. Can I take a look to the implementation
anywhere? I would like to check if it fits to Tobago.
So we can share the code
to leverage it
without linking themselves to MyFaces impl. For that part I'll also drill
down the spec to see if there's any indication about that use case, but I
think we might have to ping the EG.
Regards,
~ Simon
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok never mind
+1
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 7:09 AM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
2009/8/14 Jan-Kees van Andel jankeesvanan...@gmail.com
+1
2009/8/14 Bruno Aranda brunoara...@gmail.com:
+1
2009/8/14 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org:
+1 :-)
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:24 AM,
Hi,
Since it's an internal API I think we should just flush the class down the
drain.
~ Simon
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Jan-Kees van Andel
jankeesvanan...@gmail.com wrote:
Removing the view-handler / element from my faces-config.xml did the
trick.
Funny that everything worked
Hmm,
I used the latest nightly build when I integrated the code. However, that
was about 3~4 months ago, so maybe it changed a little since then, or there
was another usable branch that I was unaware of. That being said, maybe we
should add the required changes by ourselves. Even if Facelets is
advantages, correct dependency structure, and out-of-the-box conversation
support in JSF.
Anyway, a parameter switch sounds like a good idea.
~ Simon
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:18 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.orgwrote:
my friend Mark Struberg pointed me to this interesting thread:
= http
Hi,
They used to be under javax.faces.model. However, due to overlap with
JSR-299 they were moved to javax.faces.bean, see the companion JavaDoc
(under \managed-bean-javadocs).
Regards,
~ Simon
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Curtiss Howard curtiss.how...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
The JSF 2.0
the
DataModels...
/JK
2009/8/3 Simon Lessard simon.lessar...@gmail.com:
Hi,
They used to be under javax.faces.model. However, due to overlap with
JSR-299 they were moved to javax.faces.bean, see the companion JavaDoc
(under \managed-bean-javadocs).
Regards,
~ Simon
On Mon
with the current code, but I
didn't try it.
Regards,
~ Simon
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Michael Concini mconc...@gmail.comwrote:
Great news. Thanks a lot.
Simon Lessard wrote:
Hi,
I'll try to commit that tonight.
~ Simon
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Michael Concini mconc
Hi,
I'll try to commit that tonight.
~ Simon
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Michael Concini mconc...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Simon,
I wanted to do a quick follow up here. There are a few of us who are ready
to start filling in the gaps once the initial commit is done. Have you had
)
3. Adjust some classes (should be minor, mainly regarding delegates that
could have been handled in 1)
Regards,
~ Simon
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:46 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.orgwrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Leonardo Uribelu4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Just a small
Hi Michael,
Personally I think it should be a different branch, I just never created it
because I'm not familiar enough with it. This will also allow addition of
1.5 features in it so I'm all for it.
Regards,
~ Simon
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Michael Concini mconc...@gmail.com wrote
Hi,
I'm working on it. Hopefully it'll be done by next Sunday. So far I think I
should be able to handle it on my own. If not ready by Sunday, then I guess
some help would be needed. As for the taglib, we keep the tags defined by
the spec.
Regards,
~ Simon
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 8:54 AM
construct would be fater, albeit a bit heavier on memory, so I'd like to do
some testing to see how much faster/heavier a Map would be.
Regards,
~ Simon
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Curtiss Howard
curtiss.how...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Simon
Lessardsimon.lessar
in this
case. I don't know is Apache usually release and deploy their test-jar
though, so it's still a pending issue I think.
~ Simon
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Curtiss Howard
curtiss.how...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Leonardo Uribelu4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
to release a MyFaces test framework ever
running into the interdependency issues again.
Regards,
~ Simon
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.orgwrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Simon Lessardsimon.lessar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I think the Shale
Hi,
On my side I'll try to work and finish Facelets part within 2 weeks, fater
than that is impossible for me atm.
Regards,
~ Simon
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
regarding tree visitor, this may help:
https
We use the Facelets codebase, we just have to rename the package (already
done), use the HandlerDelegate ... thing ... and implement the Facelets VDL.
Those are not part of standard Facelets with existing ASL 2.0 code.
~ Simon
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat
+1
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.orgwrote:
sure!
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
+1, but just a small suggestion. Right now I'm running the necessary
steps
for release myfaces core 1.2.7, core 1.1.7, so I would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ORCHESTRA-32?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Kitching reopened ORCHESTRA-32:
-
Thanks for reporting this Mark. It's definitely a bad idea for a readResolve
method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ORCHESTRA-32?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12710375#action_12710375
]
Simon Kitching commented on ORCHESTRA-32:
-
Ok, should be fixed now (see r775960
Sounds acceptable then.
~ Simon
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Blake Sullivan
blake.sulli...@oracle.comwrote:
Simon Lessard said the following On 5/17/2009 6:19 AM PT:
Hi Blake,
*Prefer the same what? Are you talking about the ExternalContext?*
I meant placing register the listeners
Hi Blake,
*Prefer the same what? Are you talking about the ExternalContext?*
I meant placing register the listeners the Window itself, not the Manager,
same as isNew.
~ Simon
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Blake Sullivan
blake.sulli...@oracle.comwrote:
Simon Lessard said the following
it be possible to place
the ExternalContext instance in the event?
6. I would prefer to see WindowManager.isCurrentWindowNew as
Window.isNew, it's more OOP correct;
7. Actually I would prefer the same for the add/get/removeWindowListener
Regards,
~ Simon
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Blake
Sounds pretty decent to me, we'll just have to make sure we still pass the
TCK after though since the spec also define the default.
~ Simon
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
mwessend...@gmail.comwrote:
Of course ordering after the standard...
Sent from my iPod.
Am
Well I guess you're right, there's no way that the property will be set
during the tests.
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
mwessend...@gmail.comwrote:
I guess the tck has no org.apache.** cfg param as sys prop
Sent from my iPod.
Am 14.05.2009 um 22:45 schrieb Simon
+1
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Jeanne Waldman
jeanne.wald...@oracle.comwrote:
+1 to the name
Is everyone ok with trinidadinternal plus a comment staying it is private
being enough to make this 'private' so that we are free to remove it and/or
change the default behavior after it has
That's good to know. Maybe we should wikify that fact for MyFaces in
general?
~ Simon
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:11 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I assume the problem with Netbeans (which in my opinion currently has the
best maven support) is that its maven implementation to my
Not sure on my side, I'm really not into AJAX. I followed the discussions,
but really not deeply enough to get that kind of detail. :(
~ Simon
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok Since Ganesh pointed it out, this is even better.
We probably wont need
$0.02
-M
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Simon Lessard simon.lessar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Weird, it certainly overlaps BIG time, most of what their spec seem to
have
is already in JSR-299 too... Maybe I'm missing something...
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat
Yeah PartialPageContextImpl does, I'll try to find the best possible design,
I don't really like moving methods to public API unless they really have to
be there. I'll work on that this weekend most likely, along with some 2.0
tasks.
~ Simon
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Blake Sullivan
Hi,
Currently Trinidad won't allow to redefine the RequestContextFactory once
it's defined, preventing any attempt to decorate it. Would it be ok with you
if I removed that check?
Regards,
~ Simon
Hi,
I won't -1 it, most likely +0, but I'm curious, why can't
RenderKit.getRenderer be used for that case use case? The only case it does
not cover would be a component not getting its Renderer the standard way,
but to my knowledge all UIXComponent do so I'm not sure.
Regards,
~ Simon
On Thu
Hi Michael,
Definitely 3. It's true that JSF 2.0's ViewHandler no longer do much, it
pretty much only deal with HTTP headers and such while most of the work is
delegated to the VDL. 2 might break the TCK I think so it's not a good
option.
~ Simon
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Michael Concini
. If anyone
see another possibility to achieve the same decoration goal (beside
extending RequestContextImpl directly please), it would be welcome.
Regards,
~ Simon
Congratulations and thanks for the great work.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
The Myfaces PMC is proud to announce a new addition to our community.
Please welcome Michael Concini as the newest MyFaces committer!
Congratulations and thanks for the great work on JSF 2.0 AJAX.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.orgwrote:
welcome!
-- Forwarded message --
From: Cagatay Civici cagatay.civ...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:27 AM
Subject: Re:
[1] +1
[2] -1
[3] -1
[4] +0
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Cagatay Civici cagatay.civ...@gmail.comwrote:
[1] +1
[2] -1
[3] -1
[4] +0
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.comwrote:
[1] +1
[2] -1
[3] -1
[4] +1
Werner
Ganesh schrieb:
Hi,
We are
Awesome, thanks to everyone who helped with that.
Now I gotta do my part and finish Facelets...
~ Simon
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:06 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.orgwrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello everyone
as it seems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12702074#action_12702074
]
Simon Godard commented on MYFACES-2165:
---
We had the same problem on a customer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12702168#action_12702168
]
Simon Godard commented on MYFACES-2165:
---
I don't understand how the Servlet mapping
to handle this, ie is the
response message structured so that a non-browser can still interpret it
correctly? As long as the response contains just XML with component ids
and values, it seems that this would work ok...
Cheers,
Simon
performance
tweaks, just attributes on f:ajax, or using nested f:attribute seems ok.
But for the other one (queueLength?) I would strongly recommend an
mf:ajax or mf:attribute tag be created.
[1] At least, facelets for JSF1.2 works this way. I presume this hasn't
changed...
Regards,
Simon
Ganesh
Definitely +1
~ Simon
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Just for information purposes and as start point, what we have right now is
this wiki page:
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/MyFaces_Archetypes_for_Maven
The archetypes available
myfaces
Hi,
The class gets generated by a Maven plugin using _UISelectItems as a base.
It works fine for me. Did you checkout also the mavin plugin projects?
Regards,
~ Simon
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Ganesh gan...@j4fry.org wrote:
Hi Simon,
I have run mvn install. In the API
in a container that doesn't
recognise these attributes, I expect they would just be ignored (the
extra attributes would not be rendered into the generated page).
Regards,
Simon
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Simon Kitching skitch...@apache.org wrote:
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Ganesh gan...@j4fry.org wrote:
Hi,
Here's a question concerning the extension parameters pps, queuesize and
errorlevel
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Ganesh gan...@j4fry.org wrote:
As Simon said, inclusion into f:ajax is probably not a good idea, because
applications using JSP+Mojarra would break when containing the additional
param.
Just FYI, myfaces core *must* pass the Sun
for that code yet. Once the partial
context and writer as well as JSP VDL are implemented then I think a simpel
test case will be runnable.
Regards,
~ Simon
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Ganesh gan...@j4fry.org wrote:
Hi Simon,
After we got getting most of the Javascript running I want to switch
?
Cheers,
Simon
Manfred Geiler schrieb:
+1 for moving to new infrastructure
--Manfred
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:02, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
attached is an announcement that there is now a nice support for CI
servers.
I'd like to move the myfaces (sub) projects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ORCHESTRA-40?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12699345#action_12699345
]
Simon Kitching commented on ORCHESTRA-40:
-
Could you describe some of the use
list really doesn't seem the right place for this
to be investigated.
Regards, Simon
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
hrm, when replacing the EL jars fixes it (or causes it on the other direction)
AND the same issue occurs with vanilla JSF, it is somewhat clear to me
that the issue is in the EL
Simon Lessard schrieb:
Hi all,
This is a simple post to inform you that the final JSF 2.0 draft was
released yesterday
(http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/pfd/jsr314/index.html) and
that
the 2.0 branch is in sync with it (at least to my knowledge). Not
everything
is integrated
: Simon Lessard
Assignee: Simon Lessard
JSF 2.0 requires Facelets integration. Since I'm going to deal with this whole
thing I'm creating this ticket to keep track of it.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Lessard updated MYFACES-2081:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-alpha
Assignee: Simon Lessard
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Lessard updated MYFACES-2178:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-alpha
Status: Resolved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Lessard updated MYFACES-2179:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-alpha
Status: Resolved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Lessard updated MYFACES-2180:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-alpha
Status: Resolved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Lessard updated MYFACES-2181:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-alpha
Status: Resolved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Lessard updated MYFACES-2182:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-alpha
Status: Resolved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Lessard resolved MYFACES-2105.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-alpha
Was resolved with Application
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Lessard resolved MYFACES-2102.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-alpha
Was resolved with Application
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Lessard resolved MYFACES-1950.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-alpha
Was resolved with Application
1 - 100 of 1399 matches
Mail list logo
