+1
Am 13.01.11 19:21, schrieb Michael Freedman:
Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project
and a distributable has been built and is hosted on:
http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/
+1
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Am 13.01.11 19:21, schrieb Michael Freedman:
Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project
and a distributable has been built and is hosted on:
+1
2011/1/14 Grant Smith work.gr...@gmail.com
+1
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.comwrote:
+1
Am 13.01.11 19:21, schrieb Michael Freedman:
Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project
and a distributable has been built and is
Looks like I don't have a LICENSE/NOTICE file in the TCK svn project.
As this distributable is just a zip of the svn project, it explains why
you aren't seeing the files. Turns out this is a holdover from Bridge
1.0 TCK which has already been released and lacks the LICENSE/NOTICE
files. Let
there is a reason . the bits are no maven artifacts, so there is no
need to deploy them to central
(and we never did that).
Michale,
using your private URL is fine; Once the release is done, we will
continue the regular process. where the bits
'just' got deployed to the MyFaces (Portal TCK) site
Matthias and I spoke offline a bit and I think it merits writing up a
JIRA which would allow us to have stuff in the repo so that projects can
include it. I'm not sure how feasible this is, given that the TCK needs
to run against a native portal environment, but I certainly wouldn't be
Would be a nice improvement
-M
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote:
Matthias and I spoke offline a bit and I think it merits writing up a JIRA
which would allow us to have stuff in the repo so that projects can include
it. I'm not sure how feasible this
Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project
and a distributable has been built and is hosted on:
http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/
http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/.
The zip has been verified to
+1
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Michael Freedman
michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote:
Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project and
a distributable has been built and is hosted on:
http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/.
The zip
+1
On 1/13/2011 10:21 AM, Michael Freedman wrote:
Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK
project and a distributable has been built and is hosted on:
http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/
+1 Good work Mike
On 01/13/2011 11:31 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
+1
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Michael Freedman
michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote:
Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project and
a distributable has been built and is hosted on:
Hi
Checking the distributables, I have seen that there is no LICENSE / NOTICE
on the parent folder or in META-INF folder. Is that correct?
In comparison, the files for portlet bridge 2.0
(portlet-bridge-2.0.0-src-all.zip) does have it.
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
2011/1/12 Matthias Wessendorf
+1
Leonardo
+1
On 01/12/2011 03:01 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
+1
Leonardo
Leonardo and Matthias,
Can Nexus host distributables only? There should be no repository
entries associated with this project. It's run from maven directly so
this distributable should simply be a zip of the svn source tree
(without the svn directories).
Scott
On 01/12/2011 03:00 PM,
The staging repository has now been closed. Please vote soon.
-Mike-
On 1/7/2011 2:40 PM, Jakob Korherr wrote:
Hi,
The related staging repo (orgapachemyfaces-069) is not closed, but it
should be for a vote, because otherwise the contents can still change.
Furthermore when closing the
+1.
-Mike-
On 1/5/2011 12:53 PM, Michael Freedman wrote:
Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0.
This is the final version of the JSR 329 RI and corresponds to
Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 specification which was
finalized/approved by the JCP
+1
Werner
Am 11.01.11 17:44, schrieb Michael Freedman:
+1.
-Mike-
On 1/5/2011 12:53 PM, Michael Freedman wrote:
Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0.
This is the final version of the JSR 329 RI and corresponds to Portlet
2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2
Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0
TCK. This is the final version of the JSR 329 TCK and corresponds to
Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 specification which was
finalized/approved by the JCP last month.
Note: The TCK is designed to be built and
was there any reason why you didn't use Nexus for the release procedure?
MyFaces (sub)projects agreed to use this..
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Michael Freedman
michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote:
Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK.
This is the final
+1
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Werner
Am 11.01.11 17:44, schrieb Michael Freedman:
+1.
-Mike-
On 1/5/2011 12:53 PM, Michael Freedman wrote:
Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0.
This is the final version
Hi,
The related staging repo (orgapachemyfaces-069) is not closed, but it
should be for a vote, because otherwise the contents can still change.
Furthermore when closing the repo it will automatically be checked
against obvious flaws (like wrong checksums).
Please close the repo so that we can
Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0.
This is the final version of the JSR 329 RI and corresponds to Portlet
2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 specification which was
finalized/approved by the JCP last month.
Distributable components can be inspected in
what happened to this vote ?
-Matthias
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On 07/22/2010 04:41 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
+1
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Michael Freedman
michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote:
+1
On 7/20/2010 2:09 PM,
Actually, I had deferred sending the results message pending us
actually doing/pushing the release which I thought was imminent. Alas I
am still awaiting getting some free time from the developer tasked to do
this but that slot never seems to open up -- so its now 2+ months since
this was
Hi Mike,
you should send out the result vote roughly 72hrs after the vote has
started. When you do the release based on the vote - is your timing
thingy ;)
best regards,
Martin
On 10/12/10, Michael Freedman michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote:
Actually, I had deferred sending the results
+1
On 07/22/2010 04:41 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
+1
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Michael Freedman
michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote:
+1
On 7/20/2010 2:09 PM, Michael Freedman wrote:
Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0-beta.
This is the
+1
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Michael Freedman
michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote:
+1
On 7/20/2010 2:09 PM, Michael Freedman wrote:
Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0-beta.
This is the beta version of the JSR 329 RI: Portlet 2.0 Bridge for
JavaServer
+1
Am 20.07.10 23:09, schrieb Michael Freedman:
Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge
2.0.0-beta. This is the beta version of the JSR 329 RI: Portlet 2.0
Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2. It corresponds to that JSRs Public
Review draft which is currently posted and
+1
On 7/20/2010 2:09 PM, Michael Freedman wrote:
Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge
2.0.0-beta. This is the beta version of the JSR 329 RI: Portlet 2.0
Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2. It corresponds to that JSRs Public
Review draft which is currently posted and
Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge
2.0.0-beta. This is the beta version of the JSR 329 RI: Portlet 2.0
Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2. It corresponds to that JSRs Public
Review draft which is currently posted and underway.
The signed bridge artifacts pass what
31 matches
Mail list logo
