[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato resolved OFBIZ-2486.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
The release branch 4.0 is no more actively maintained.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato resolved OFBIZ-3769.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
The release branch 4.0 is no more actively maintained.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato resolved OFBIZ-4366.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
The release branch 4.0 is no more actively maintained.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato resolved OFBIZ-1745.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
The release branch 4.0 is no more actively maintained.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-4735.
--
> User behaviour issue on Lookup.
> ---
>
> Key: OF
Hi Mansour,
From: "Mansour Al Akeel"
Jacques,
We use RTL.
May be you are right about the the ease of use to find an item, but
the user who has permission to all these functionality is an admin,
and normally, she is comfortable finding any item quickly. The rest of
the uses don't have that much
Fedex rates calculation requires weight and dimensions of packages only. Also
Make sure that which type of rates you are getting, its a list rate or
discounted rate of your account.
Regards
Arun Patidar
Hotwax Media | www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 20-Mar-2012, at 5:36 PM, Prince Sewani wrote
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13234069#comment-13234069
]
Deepak Dixit commented on OFBIZ-4734:
-
Thanks Ashish.
> User behaviou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13234070#comment-13234070
]
Deepak Dixit commented on OFBIZ-4735:
-
Thanks Ashish.
> User behaviou
From: "Mansour Al Akeel"
Everyone has different preference about how would the basic component
skeleton looks like (ie, with ajax, without, exta functionality
).
Even if a basic example included with ofbiz distribution, in the
future it will grow again with extra unneeded functionality, or
Jacques,
We use RTL.
May be you are right about the the ease of use to find an item, but
the user who has permission to all these functionality is an admin,
and normally, she is comfortable finding any item quickly. The rest of
the uses don't have that much items and menus shown.
I know, other the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13233902#comment-13233902
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4740:
We should check before if it's not a feat
Error in Find Content Lookup
Key: OFBIZ-4741
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4741
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: content
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Reporter
From: "Scott Gray"
On 21/03/2012, at 9:24 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
Le 20/03/2012 12:48, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
G) specialpurpose/ofbizwebsite: move to "Attic"
Jacques and Olivier proposed to move it to Extras instead just in case someone
will pick up the work and complete it i
I see that most people prefer Flat Grey.
Let me explain why I prefer Tomahawk.
Did you ever wonder why the paper we write on has more than often a greater
height than width, why newspaper have many columns, etc.
Here is an answer
http://graphicdesign.stackexchange.com/questions/3553/why-do-new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13233819#comment-13233819
]
Tom Burns commented on OFBIZ-4740:
--
Consider removing this drop down
> U
Un-necessary Drop Down in Web Tools
---
Key: OFBIZ-4740
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4740
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: framework
Reporter: Tom Bu
Everyone has different preference about how would the basic component
skeleton looks like (ie, with ajax, without, exta functionality
).
Even if a basic example included with ofbiz distribution, in the
future it will grow again with extra unneeded functionality, or it
will be an on going discu
View Calendar Broken in Party Manager > Relationships
-
Key: OFBIZ-4739
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4739
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: party
On 21/03/2012, at 9:24 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
> Le 20/03/2012 12:48, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>>
>>> G) specialpurpose/ofbizwebsite: move to "Attic"
>>>
>>
>> Jacques and Olivier proposed to move it to Extras instead just in case
>> someone will pick up the work and complete it in th
Le 20/03/2012 12:47, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
Q) framework/example and framework/exampleext: move to specialpurpose
Adrian would like to keep Example in the framework but slim it down a lot to the essential (no form
widgets examples, no Ajax examples, no content examples etc...). Adrian wou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13233716#comment-13233716
]
Tom Burns commented on OFBIZ-4731:
--
The note in the discussion section "Problem In Trunk
Le 20/03/2012 12:48, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
G) specialpurpose/ofbizwebsite: move to "Attic"
Jacques and Olivier proposed to move it to Extras instead just in case someone
will pick up the work and complete it in the future.
I would like to mention that, if the original goal was "to eat
Le 20/03/2012 13:18, Sascha Rodekamp a écrit :
Hi,
1) keep it in framework
+1
2) but remove it from the upcoming new release branch 12.04
+1 - for now the JCR implementation provide the the developer an API
which helps to create, read, update or delete content in the
repository. We have no
I'm in favor of moving all special purpose apps to Extras (or Attic for some of
the older/unused ones) except for ecommerce. Even then the only reason I'd
like to keep ecommerce is because it is the only special purpose app that is
almost universally useful to OFBiz users and I'd like to keep i
We currently use the new FedEx Web Services API in our OFBiz installation.
We'll try to create a patch and contribute it fairly soon.
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Default-package-size-assumed-by-fedex-tp4488552p4489853.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing l
Minor Refactoring in CategoryWorker - use delegator instead of request in
getRelatedCategoriesRet
-
Key: OFBIZ-4738
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-47
I think it's really necessary to look at the bigger picture rather than
worrying about having a null check in place. The delegator methods that return
a List pretty much never return null, so the only time that specific list will
be null is when an EntityException is thrown. So IMO the main pr
My vote will be to keep two themes in the project. IMO Flatgrey theme is
the best to keep as the default one for the project.
--
Ashish
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Jacopo Cappellato <
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote:
> > I) $OFBIZ_HOME/themes/*: move a few of them to "Attic" and a
Another data point: I've been in several OFBiz shops recently and have
observed that many people end up using Flat Grey. Not sure why this is.
IMHO Tomahawk looks nice, but in the end, the mixture of dark and light
is hard on the eyes. Having to scroll over to expose links makes
navigation mor
I use example component as my reference for best practice guide. Still I think
its better placed in Ofbiz Extras.
Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
On Mar 20, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Nicolas Malin wrote:
> Le 20/03/2012 16:38, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>> From: "Nicolas Malin"
>>> L
I prefer keep Flat Gray theme in Ofbiz over others.
Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
On Mar 20, 2012, at 9:18 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> From: "Mansour Al Akeel"
>> Flat Gray is simple, and clear.
>> It serves well as a basic theme.
>> AFAIK, it the only theme that supports both directions for
Le 20/03/2012 16:38, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
From: "Nicolas Malin"
Le 20/03/2012 12:47, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
Q) framework/example and framework/exampleext: move to specialpurpose
Adrian would like to keep Example in the framework but slim it down
a lot to the essential (no form widge
I did not intend to use Maven at all, but good catch and yes for a (possible
far) future iteration
Jacques
From: "Mansour Al Akeel"
Ant+Ivy would fit easier with the structure of ofbiz components.
If we want to move to maven, then a modification to
org/ofbiz/base/location/FlexibleLocation.jav
You could maybe contribute your work on it?
Jacques
From: "J. Eckard"
I currently use jetty, and keep it updated internally to track the jetty 6 codebase. I have no problem with it being removed from
the framework, as long as we don't assume or require tomcat in the future.
On Mar 20, 2012,
Ant+Ivy would fit easier with the structure of ofbiz components.
If we want to move to maven, then a modification to
org/ofbiz/base/location/FlexibleLocation.java has to be
done to allow loading resource from a jar file. I am assuming with
maven, you want to package the whole component in
a jar fil
I currently use jetty, and keep it updated internally to track the jetty 6
codebase. I have no problem with it being removed from the framework, as long
as we don't assume or require tomcat in the future.
On Mar 20, 2012, at 7:48 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>
>> C) $OFBIZ_HOME/debian: move t
From: "Nicolas Malin"
Le 20/03/2012 12:47, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
Q) framework/example and framework/exampleext: move to specialpurpose
Adrian would like to keep Example in the framework but slim it down a lot to
the essential (no form widgets examples, no Ajax
examples, no content examp
From: "Nicolas Malin"
Agree with Jacopo, specialpurpose should be on extras.
Huho? ;o)
Scrum depend of projectmgr, the OFBiz extra will be have a dependency management to ensure that all needed components will be
present.
Good point!
To all: is crowd dependent on ldap?
Jacques
Nicolas
From: "Jacopo Cappellato"
C) $OFBIZ_HOME/debian: move to "Attic"
D) the seleniumxml code in framework/testtools: move to "Attic"
E) specialpurpose/workflow: move to "Attic"
F) specialpurpose/shark: move to "Attic"
J) framework/appserver: move to "Extras"
This one I could try to maintain. T
From: "Jacopo Cappellato"
O) framework/documents: move the content to Wiki and then move to "Attic"
The broader topic is to move all the artifacts related to online help out of the framework; they should all live under
"applications".
What about documents currently in documents folders und
2012/3/20 Jacques Le Roux :
> BTW, this shows how stupid is the for loop in Java implementation. The
> suggested safeList() should be handled by the compiler IMO, I
> see no gains to not have it in but to get NPEs. Did I miss something?
>
Nothing. Is there an implementation of this safeList() in co
Makes sense
Jacopo
On Mar 20, 2012, at 3:58 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> From: "Jacopo Cappellato"
>>> A) move framework/guiapp out of the framework; after all these years no
>>> code made advantage of it being part of the framework and it is only used
>>> by the specialpurpose/pos component
Beware, see Si Chen last message on user ML
<>
Jacques
From: "Prince Sewani"
Hi All,
I've a question, If the 'shipment.fedex.default.packagingType' is set to
'YOURPACKNG' ,
then what are the default dimensions assumed by Fedex for the package in which the
product will be packed?
I see a
From: "Mansour Al Akeel"
Flat Gray is simple, and clear.
It serves well as a basic theme.
AFAIK, it the only theme that supports both directions for languages
LTR and RTL.
Right and Tomahawk is the last evolution of all others. I prefer Tomahawk: it's easier to find you way because of hierarch
From:
I believe the original purpose of the Example component was to provide
a very basic application that new developers can analyze and learn
from. Running the ant task creates an empty application - there is
nothing to see there.
So, here is the use case: I need to train new developers
BTW, this shows how stupid is the for loop in Java implementation. The
suggested safeList() should be handled by the compiler IMO, I
see no gains to not have it in but to get NPEs. Did I miss something?
Jacques
From: "Paul Foxworthy"
Hi Erwan,
To be sure there is no Null Pointer Exception, y
From: "Jacopo Cappellato"
H) specialpurpose/*: move several (if not all, apart ecommerce) of the components to "Extras" (if there are persons interested to
become committers/maintainers) or to "Attic"
There seems to be a general agreement to slim down the number of applications in this gro
From: "Jacopo Cappellato"
A) move framework/guiapp out of the framework; after all these years no code made advantage of it being part of the framework and
it is only used by the specialpurpose/pos component (which was the component for which it was built for); so guiapp can go in the
pos compo
From: "Nicolas Malin"
Le 20/03/2012 11:48, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
Or alternatively we could:
1) keep it in framework
2) but remove it from the upcoming new release branch 12.04
3) and then, as a community, we could start the effort (i.e. top priority for upcoming contributions/commits) of
Sounds like a plan
Jacques
From: "Sascha Rodekamp"
Hi,
1) keep it in framework
+1
2) but remove it from the upcoming new release branch 12.04
+1 - for now the JCR implementation provide the the developer an API
which helps to create, read, update or delete content in the
repository. We h
Yes, making it an extra is an option.
-Adrian
Quoting Mansour Al Akeel :
is it possible to download the "example" separately for new comers ?
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:28 AM,
wrote:
I believe the original purpose of the Example component was to provide a
very basic application that ne
is it possible to download the "example" separately for new comers ?
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:28 AM, wrote:
> I believe the original purpose of the Example component was to provide a
> very basic application that new developers can analyze and learn from.
> Running the ant task creates an em
I have always had a problem with OS-specific code being maintained in
OFBiz. Granted, we have some artifacts that must take the OS into
consideration in order to get OFBiz to work, but it appears to me the
Debian stuff doesn't fall into that category (I could be wrong, please
correct me if
widget.screen.ScreenRenderException in HR Find Internal Job Posting for search
Result
-
Key: OFBIZ-4737
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4737
Project:
Flat Gray is simple, and clear.
It serves well as a basic theme.
AFAIK, it the only theme that supports both directions for languages
LTR and RTL.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:33 AM, wrote:
> My preference is to keep Flat Grey and one other theme - I have no
> preference on what that other theme
+1 birt to Extra.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:31 AM, wrote:
> I like the idea of keeping reporting tools separate from OFBiz. In my
> experience, IT departments are already using a reporting tool for other
> applications and they would prefer to integrate that tool with OFBiz,
> instead of learn
My preference is to keep Flat Grey and one other theme - I have no
preference on what that other theme is.
-Adrian
Quoting Jacopo Cappellato :
I) $OFBIZ_HOME/themes/*: move a few of them to "Attic" and a few of
them to "Extras"; keep just one (or two)
Jacques proposed to keep Tomahawk (
I like the idea of keeping reporting tools separate from OFBiz. In my
experience, IT departments are already using a reporting tool for
other applications and they would prefer to integrate that tool with
OFBiz, instead of learning/using a new tool that comes bundled with it.
-Adrian
Quoti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
patrick LE BLAN updated OFBIZ-3458:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: please tell how error occurs)
> Encountered the following err
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13233442#comment-13233442
]
patrick LE BLAN commented on OFBIZ-3458:
please tell how error occurs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13233438#comment-13233438
]
patrick LE BLAN commented on OFBIZ-4674:
Same plus can't developp tree whatever re
I believe the original purpose of the Example component was to provide
a very basic application that new developers can analyze and learn
from. Running the ant task creates an empty application - there is
nothing to see there.
So, here is the use case: I need to train new developers to writ
Le 20/03/2012 12:47, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
L) framework/birt (and related dependencies/reports spread around): move to
"Extras"
M) framework/bi (and related dependencies - ecas/business rules and data - spread
around): move to "Extras"
This is an area where Hans and I are in disagreeme
Le 20/03/2012 12:47, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
Q) framework/example and framework/exampleext: move to specialpurpose
Adrian would like to keep Example in the framework but slim it down a lot to the essential (no form
widgets examples, no Ajax examples, no content examples etc...). Adrian woul
Agree with Jacopo, specialpurpose should be on extras.
Scrum depend of projectmgr, the OFBiz extra will be have a dependency
management to ensure that all needed components will be present.
Nicolas
Le 20/03/2012 12:47, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
H) specialpurpose/*: move several (if not all,
Add Product Reviews to the detail Screen
Key: OFBIZ-4736
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4736
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: specialpurpose/ecommerce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Markus M. May updated OFBIZ-4736:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-4736-Add_Product_Reviews_to_the_profile_screen.patch
> Add Product Reviews
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Markus M. May updated OFBIZ-4736:
-
Summary: Add Product Reviews to the profile Screen (was: Add Product
Reviews to the detail Scree
Hi,
> 1) keep it in framework
+1
> 2) but remove it from the upcoming new release branch 12.04
+1 - for now the JCR implementation provide the the developer an API
which helps to create, read, update or delete content in the
repository. We have no integration in other (i.e. the content)
applicati
Well If we're talking about the 'Enhanced For loop' in Java from 1.5 onwards
Then it goes something like this, you'll only get NPE if you haven't
initialized the collection,
otherwise if you've initialized the collection and there are no values in it
then
the for loop won't execute any iteratio
Hi All,
I've a question, If the 'shipment.fedex.default.packagingType' is set to
'YOURPACKNG' ,
then what are the default dimensions assumed by Fedex for the package in which
the
product will be packed?
I see a lot of difference in rates when I log-into Fedex a/c and give the zip
codes, the
> C) $OFBIZ_HOME/debian: move to "Attic"
>
> D) the seleniumxml code in framework/testtools: move to "Attic"
>
> E) specialpurpose/workflow: move to "Attic"
>
> F) specialpurpose/shark: move to "Attic"
>
> J) framework/appserver: move to "Extras"
>
> K) framework/jetty: move to "Extras" (or "
> O) framework/documents: move the content to Wiki and then move to "Attic"
>
The broader topic is to move all the artifacts related to online help out of
the framework; they should all live under "applications".
> I) $OFBIZ_HOME/themes/*: move a few of them to "Attic" and a few of them to
> "Extras"; keep just one (or two)
>
Jacques proposed to keep Tomahawk (default) and Flat Grey.
Olivier proposed to keep just one (Tomahawk, I guess).
No other comments so far.
What should be do with the remaining them
> G) specialpurpose/ofbizwebsite: move to "Attic"
>
Jacques and Olivier proposed to move it to Extras instead just in case someone
will pick up the work and complete it in the future.
I would like to mention that, if the original goal was "to eat our own dog
food" and run the OFBiz site on it,
> Q) framework/example and framework/exampleext: move to specialpurpose
Adrian would like to keep Example in the framework but slim it down a lot to
the essential (no form widgets examples, no Ajax examples, no content examples
etc...). Adrian would you please confirm if in your vision the "exam
> P) framework/datafile: (who is currently using it?) move to "Extras" or
> "Attic"; we could replace it with commons-csv or similar tool
>
There seems to be a general consensus to keep the component as is.
Jacopo
>
> H) specialpurpose/*: move several (if not all, apart ecommerce) of the
> components to "Extras" (if there are persons interested to become
> committers/maintainers) or to "Attic"
>
There seems to be a general agreement to slim down the number of applications
in this group and move them to
> A) move framework/guiapp out of the framework; after all these years no code
> made advantage of it being part of the framework and it is only used by the
> specialpurpose/pos component (which was the component for which it was built
> for); so guiapp can go in the pos component
>
> B) specia
>
> L) framework/birt (and related dependencies/reports spread around): move to
> "Extras"
>
> M) framework/bi (and related dependencies - ecas/business rules and data -
> spread around): move to "Extras"
>
This is an area where Hans and I are in disagreement and we didn't get much
feedback
Le 20/03/2012 11:48, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
Or alternatively we could:
1) keep it in framework
2) but remove it from the upcoming new release branch 12.04
3) and then, as a community, we could start the effort (i.e. top priority for
upcoming contributions/commits) of defining the set of re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1325#comment-1325
]
Tri Duc Vo edited comment on OFBIZ-4627 at 3/20/12 11:08 AM:
-
Or alternatively we could:
1) keep it in framework
2) but remove it from the upcoming new release branch 12.04
3) and then, as a community, we could start the effort (i.e. top priority for
upcoming contributions/commits) of defining the set of requirements needed by
the applications to replace t
Hi Erwan,
To be sure there is no Null Pointer Exception, yes, you need to test for
null first. One possibility is to just let the NPE happen.
The discussion at
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2250031/null-check-in-an-enhanced-for-loop
suggests
for( Object o : safe( list ) ) {
// do whatev
On Mar 20, 2012, at 10:15 AM, Olivier Heintz wrote:
> New thread for only JCR funstion
>
> Summary of initial discussion:
>
> Jacoppo:
>> N) framework/jcr: move back into the Jackrabbit branch until the work is
>> completed and can replace the existing "content framework"
>
> Hans:
> >> Also
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya reassigned OFBIZ-4734:
--
Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya
> User behaviour issue on auto-completer.
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya reassigned OFBIZ-4735:
--
Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya
> User behaviour issue on Lookup.
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1325#comment-1325
]
Tri Duc Vo commented on OFBIZ-4627:
---
Thank Jacques
Remove all and then add all + changes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Deepak Dixit updated OFBIZ-4735:
Attachment: OFBIZ-4735.patch
OFBIZ-4735-11.04.patch
Added ajax-loader image on the
On Mar 20, 2012, at 10:28 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
> Use the Moqui approach and separate in
>
> 1. framework,
> 2. services and entities
> 3. application components
By the way, as I mentioned in another thread, I like very much the idea above
of having a lighter framework, a library of generic se
User behaviour issue on Lookup.
---
Key: OFBIZ-4735
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4735
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: framework
Reporter: Deepak Dixit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13233282#comment-13233282
]
Tri Duc Vo edited comment on OFBIZ-4627 at 3/20/12 9:48 AM:
De
I think that the slim down approach we are trying to implement, will help if
and when we will decide to migrate to Moqui: Moqui is already a slimmed down
framework and if our ootb applications will not rely on a fat framework will be
easy to migrate; also having less code to maintain and migrat
Jacopo,
there is another alternative not listed here:
Use the Moqui approach and separate in
1. framework,
2. services and entities
3. application components
and concider a conversion path to the moqui framework.
Regards
Hans
On 03/20/2012 04:15 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Thanks to all of
Thanks to all of you for the great discussion and feedback: I really appreciate
all the time and great ideas you have shared.
There seems to be a general agreement (with exceptions) about the following
points:
* the size of OFBiz should be reduced
* some components/features can go to Attic (i.e.
New thread for only JCR funstion
Summary of initial discussion:
Jacoppo:
N) framework/jcr: move back into the Jackrabbit branch until the work is completed and
can replace the existing "content framework"
Hans:
>> Also moving the JCR function out is not a good idea however when not
improve
Hi Hans,
Of course you do not have to agree. But, like you implied earlier: let's
put it to the vote and see what the outcome will. I assume that you will
adhere/comply to the result as well.
Regards,
Pierre
Op 19 maart 2012 13:15 schreef Hans Bakker
het volgende:
> Jacopo,
>
> I appreciate yo
It seems weird to keep a 'demo application' in the framework, purely to
facilitate developers. It adds no value to using ofbiz in production. So it
should be removable from the framework and and self-contained (no
dependencies from other applications).
Op 18 maart 2012 12:16 schreef het
volgende:
Le 19/03/2012 13:12, Hans Bakker a écrit :
Scott,
I appreciate your reply , but this apache extra's stuff is not
working.: the Apache extra's is now over one year old, in that
time there are 125 extra's for 84 projects. I even counted all the
test and apple dirs.most projects are
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
