+1
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
c:801.557.5695
On Nov 13, 2012, at 3:25 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is the vote thread to approve the first release for the 11.04 branch.
This new release, Apache OFBiz 11.04.01 (major release number: 11.04;
minor
+1
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Nov 8, 2012, at 6:28 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is the vote thread to release a new (bug fix) release for the 10.04
branch. This new release, Apache OFBiz 10.04.04 (major release number:
10.04; minor release number: 04), will supersede the release Apache
+1
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
c:801.557.5695
On Oct 14, 2012, at 9:29 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is the vote thread to release a new (bug fix) release for the 10.04
branch. This new release, Apache OFBiz 10.04.03 (major release number:
10.04; minor
+1
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
c:801.557.5695
On Jul 8, 2012, at 4:25 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
This subject has been mentioned in other threads, but I'm making it a
separate thread so everyone has a chance to comment.
I would like to backport the Mini
+1
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Apr 11, 2012, at 4:44 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is the vote thread to release a new (bug fix) release for the 10.04
branch. This new release, Apache OFBiz 10.04.02 (major release number:
10.04; minor release number: 02), will supersede the release Apache
+1
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 30, 2012, at 1:05 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
+1
Op 30 maart 2012 09:02 schreef Jacopo Cappellato
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com het volgende:
another nice thing we could do, merely esthetic, is to rename
ant.sh/ant.bat to ofbiz.sh/ofbiz.bat.
Then the
need it s/he
could still find it in one of the releases...
Jacques
From: Tim Ruppert tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com
They changed their name and rebuilt all of the web services a few years
ago. That being said, I have no idea if anyone is using it any longer - but
it stopped working for us
if this is the case), then yes might as
well remove them right away.
-David
On Aug 8, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Everybody agree?
Jacques
From: Tim Ruppert tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com
It's a likely out of date old web services API - my guess is we could drop
it all
It's a likely out of date old web services API - my guess is we could drop it
all together.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Aug 5, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi,
I really wonder if CdyneServices.java
Well said David. I think that the investment you made to OFBiz pre-Moqui was
astounding, but what you've created in Moqui has the chance to save the project
and keep it going for the _next_ 10 years. Thank you for being proactive
enough and caring enough to get out in front of the community
+1
Cheers,
Ruppert
On May 2, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
I don't know much about Moqui, but the biggest motivator I have right now for
it is that it would remove control of the framework from this community. I'd
much rather use a framework that has one good architect controlling
Congrats Sascha - great to have you here!
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Feb 15, 2011, at 12:57 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Sascha Rodekamp has accepted the invitation of the OFBiz PMC to become a new
committer
+1
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Jan 20, 2011, at 9:29 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is the vote thread to release a bug fix release for the 09.04 branch.
This bug fix release and will supersede the release Apache OFBiz 09.04 and
will be released as Apache OFBiz 09.04.01.
The files can be
+1
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Jan 19, 2011, at 12:51 PM, Erik Schuessler wrote:
Excellent. I can come up with a design improvement comp to get started.
What do you all think about the idea of switching around the search areas? It
is a user interface thing.
Thanks
E
On 1/18/2011 11:48 AM,
Just so I'm not misunderstood here - the new Flat Grey does look extremely
awesome - great work everyone!
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Jan 18, 2011, at 10:06 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
-1 - the Tomahawk theme has been awesome - no real to mess with it IMO.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Jan 18, 2011, at 3:39
It's single sign on, but I'm not sure if it ready for CrowdID:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/crowd/features/openid.jsp
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Dec 1, 2010, at 4:34 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Isn't the component 'crowd' in the specialpurpose directory provide
openId?
--
Ofbiz on twitter:
Seems like it would be prudent to wait until it is merged from the branch given
the amount of work going on there already. Why don't you put your features
into the jquery branch as further examples of where it will be utilized?
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Dec 1, 2010, at 8:21 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
+1 - we should move that stuff with the rest of the infra back to something ASF
related - but that's a David call - we can supply the files.
In retrospect, it's really a shame that we made that move at all - it's been
such a show over there with the app down most of the time. Oh well -
Thanks - I'll start a thread with Gavin and get him what he needs.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Oct 21, 2010, at 12:48 PM, David E Jones wrote:
It's out of my hands now:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2625
-David
On Oct 21, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
+1 - we
Use the Tomahawk theme
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Sep 25, 2010, at 3:27 AM, Michael Xu (xudong) wrote:
hmmBut we still need to pick up one at first and then maybe merge some
special features from other themes.
So my question here basically is which existing theme is the best one.
--
That's awesome Adam - looking forward to it!
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Sep 7, 2010, at 4:18 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
I know I've said this in the past, that a webslinger example is Coming Real
Soon(tm); but this time it's all actually implemented.
Thanks Adrian.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Jul 26, 2010, at 11:27 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Cool. Thanks Scott and Adam! All of the backports I had in mind have been
committed.
-Adrian
--- On Mon, 7/26/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
Subject:
+1 - I like Prototype, but mostly because we know it well and JQuery was yet
the framework that it is today. You're exactly right that Dojo is heavey and
Prototype is a library for javascript geeks :) JQuery is likely the best
choice on the market right now.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Jun 8, 2010,
+1
Cheers,
Ruppert
On May 16, 2010, at 10:37 AM, Bruno Busco wrote:
Thank you.
I will do that.
-Bruno
2010/5/15 Ashish Vijaywargiya vijaywargiya.ash...@gmail.com
+1.
--
Ashish
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Christopher Snow
sno...@snowconsulting.co.uk wrote:
I think it
Yes - that should not be the case. I will have it fixed ASAP (if it's still
something I can!).
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On May 16, 2010, at 9:56 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed that https
This is fixed - there was a bug in the redirect - thanks for reporting Jacques.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On May 17, 2010, at 10:22 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
Yes - that should not be the case. I will have it fixed ASAP (if it's still
something I can!).
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
From: Tim Ruppert tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com
This is fixed - there was a bug in the redirect - thanks for reporting
Jacques.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On May 17, 2010, at 10:22 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
Yes - that should not be the case. I will have it fixed ASAP (if it's
still something I can
Sounds like a bug fix to me!
Cheers,
Ruppert
On May 11, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
doo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: doogie
Date: Tue May 11 17:11:37 2010
New Revision: 943182
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=943182view=rev
Log:
Applied fix from trunk for revision: 941109
+1 on backporting tests - especially under the guise of stability.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On May 1, 2010, at 8:47 AM, Anil Patel wrote:
Keep asking, If there are enough reason, we may come up with some policy that
allows for it.
Or
may be we create one more release branch as soon as in next
My guess is that since we've increased the frequency of building tests that
this being a case by case basis would be a pain. I think adding tests to
document and improve stability should always be allowed. My two cents.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On May 1, 2010, at 10:17 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I
Go for the latter - something that isn't real.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Apr 29, 2010, at 9:48 PM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:
I am thinking to revert my commit. Actually I saw more benefit in
keeping gmail account settings but yes I agree from your point which
is very important.
I think it would
+1
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Apr 28, 2010, at 2:10 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is the vote thread to create a new release branch (not a release yet)
named release10.04.
This branch will represent a feature freeze and releases will be created over
time out of it: all the commits in this
and h2 ?
Jacques
From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com
Jacques, all,
yesterday I have received a big help from Ryan Foster and Tim Ruppert and
this helped to fix most of the issues in the layout of the OFBTECH space.
Please have a look at it:
https
and sun.com are now under the same umbrella... who could have
imagined! ;)
This is really great!
BTW thank you David for bringing up this important topic.
Jacopo
-David
On Apr 16, 2010, at 6:07 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
The only thing that's less low effort is that this keeps David
... and that
makes communication problems more likely.
-David
On Apr 21, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
Here's the latest update from Infra at the ASF:
1. They will be happy to migrate the ofbiz.org domain.
2. They have recommended that we not transfer it to them right away
- But instead
Sorry - this was supposed to be part of my message and somehow got lumped in
with Shane's latest response. My apologies.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Apr 21, 2010, at 12:32 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
No worries man
On Apr 21, 2010, at 1:32 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
Here's the information from a thread between Shane, Upayavira, Jacopo and
myself. Jacques and I also voted to make sure that it's setup before we
switch, but this should give you ample reason to believe what I wrote
before
+1
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Apr 20, 2010, at 8:46 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
+1
-Adrian
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is the vote thread to transform our release candidate 4.0 into an
official ASF release.
OFBiz 4.0 is an *old* release that will be archived (and removed from the
ASF mirrors)
I'd say let's do the same with 4.0 release - it then shows that we have more
than one release :)
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Apr 17, 2010, at 8:50 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
maybe post on user ml to see how many respond.
I agree a lot of work if not being used.
I guess removing it give the same message
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12858246#action_12858246
]
Tim Ruppert commented on OFBIZ-3708:
Yeah - this is going backwards - don't push
no plans to do
anything with ofbiz.org other than help broker it to the ASF - which could be
helpful to Mr. Jones.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Apr 16, 2010, at 2:39 PM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
Tim Ruppert wrote:
I am more than happy to take that over for the project and migrate all of
the redirects
put it up for auction
- there seem to be a lot of people looking to spend money on it
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Apr 16, 2010, at 4:32 PM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
Tim Ruppert wrote:
David, it's not $35 for me - it's only a few bucks - so I'm happy to pay it
and help broker this - especially since
.
The good thing - is regardless of which way David decides to go - I think we'll
be able to support making it happen relatively quickly.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Apr 16, 2010, at 4:58 PM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
Tim Ruppert wrote:
I guess I'd love to know why you're looking to pay $70+ for an interim
Inline
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Apr 16, 2010, at 7:00 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Now that we have an official 9.04 release, and since interest in Release 4.0
has waned, should we remove Release 4.0 from the downloads page?
+1
Also, now that we have an official 9.04 release, do we still need all of
The redirects have been updated - check them out and let me know if there are
any issues. It should work from the old release branches and the trunk.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:14 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
Yep - I'll get on that straight away.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Apr 14, 2010
Hans can't - I'm still waiting for my INFRA task to be fixed :)
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Apr 14, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Tim,
Is not Hans working on it?
Jacques
From: Tim Ruppert tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com
I don't know - I'm still waiting for access to actually happen
+1
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Apr 8, 2010, at 8:12 PM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:
+1.
--
Ashish
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Jacopo Cappellato
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
This is the vote thread to transform our release candidate 09.04 into an
official release.
The files
That's not true and you know it - my email specifically addresses how much I
think it will be an improvement.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Apr 6, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I'm a little stunned by all the push back. A year ago there was a lot of
enthusiasm for this. Now it seems I'm the
+1
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Apr 5, 2010, at 9:43 PM, Bob Morley wrote:
I am definitely not a fisheye expert, but I would hope with its JIRA
integration that something could be automated that would drive reviews
On Mar 31, 2010, at 9:44 PM, Bob Morley wrote:
Tim Ruppert wrote:
I think it makes sense to have some way of distinguishing issues that have
been filed from ones that have been filed and fix is provided - but I'm
not sure about adding additional statuses to the workflow. Normally I'd
FYI, I answered to Grant privately since he's not on the list and hooked him up
with Erik, Ean and Mike to see where we might be able to help these guys out as
well.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Apr 2, 2010, at 10:00
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12851986#action_12851986
]
Tim Ruppert commented on OFBIZ-3630:
Thanks for asking that Adrian - I thought
I think it makes sense to have some way of distinguishing issues that have been
filed from ones that have been filed and fix is provided - but I'm not sure
about adding additional statuses to the workflow. Normally I'd totally agree
(I've coded many workflows and creating custom statuses in
at 07:50 -0600, Tim Ruppert wrote:
I'm still waiting for access - thanks to Gavin for the monitoring. As for
the update scripts - this will be something we have to write.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 27, 2010, at 1:51 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Bruno,
We (mostly I) do it by hand
and have other settings/maintenance
functions merged into those screens.
Tim Ruppert wrote:
Off the top of my head the most 9 used apps would be (in no particular order
and without redesigning the apps which is likely what we really need to do):
1. Order
2. Catalog
3. Party
4. Content
5
I'm still waiting for access - thanks to Gavin for the monitoring. As for the
update scripts - this will be something we have to write.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 27, 2010, at 1:51 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Bruno,
We (mostly I) do it by hand for the moment. So we don't update it everyday.
It would be great to get these features into the trunk - looking forward to
hearing more about testing.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 24, 2010, at 1:01 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
must have missed the previous email.
downloaded and testing started.
thanks
:D
=
BJ Freeman
Off the top of my head the most 9 used apps would be (in no particular order
and without redesigning the apps which is likely what we really need to do):
1. Order
2. Catalog
3. Party
4. Content
5. Accounting (assuming AR / AP inside here eventually)
6. Facility
7. Manufacturing
8. Marketing
9.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Ruppert reassigned OFBIZ-3572:
--
Assignee: Tim Ruppert
Add news item to site index.html
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Ruppert updated OFBIZ-3572:
---
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Add news item to site index.html
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Ruppert resolved OFBIZ-3572.
Resolution: Fixed
Added in r926158. Made some changes to meet the conventions in place for all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Ruppert closed OFBIZ-3572.
--
Thanks for the contributions Ruth.
Add news item to site index.html
Actually, when I do the commits - I push them right to the site most of the
time. Normally takes about 30 minutes or so to propagate.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 22, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Thanks BJ.
Just was wondering.
Regards,
Ruth
BJ Freeman wrote:
Watching the commits
=128m
To
-Xmx768M -XX:MaxPermSize=512m
And it seamt to work for some days at least
BTW do you know where the directory is now on the machine?
Thanks
Jacques
From: Tim Ruppert tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com
Gavin started working on moving these to their final destination - so we
have
a problem with the trunk PermGen settings which will need to be
corrected at some point in the not too distant future. Thanks again to Gavin
for all of his support.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Mar 20, 2010, at 10:00 AM
Gavin started making changes last night - check the infra links - and the
previous post.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Mar 20, 2010, at 11:02 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
There is no longer any cd /usr/local/ofbiz
the values from
-Xmx512M -XX:MaxPermSize=128m
To
-Xmx768M -XX:MaxPermSize=512m
And it seamt to work for some days at least
BTW do you know where the directory is now on the machine?
Thanks
Jacques
From: Tim Ruppert tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com
Gavin started working on moving
directory on people.a.o
Thanks
Scott
On 20/03/2010, at 11:26 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
I don't have my key setup - which is why I'm not on there more often - have
that scheduled for early next week so I can dive in - so unfortunately I
don't know where he's stashed these two :)
My guess
+1 and a shout out Ean! The work you guys have done in conjunction with the
rest of the community definitely is worthy of making a big deal about.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 19, 2010, at 9:19 AM, Mike Bates wrote:
+1
--
Mike Bates
HotWax Media
CEO
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
cell:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12847191#action_12847191
]
Tim Ruppert commented on OFBIZ-3560:
Fixed in r925066
Update the Home Page to link
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Ruppert resolved OFBIZ-3560.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Removed individual service providers section
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Ruppert closed OFBIZ-3560.
--
Update the Home Page to link to the Service Providers
Thanks for the input Marc - this is definitely something that the project needs
and your contributions in this arena would definitely make a huge impact.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 18, 2010, at 7:18 PM, Marc Morin wrote:
I loath to enter into this discussion, but feel that I need to put in a bit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12847196#action_12847196
]
Tim Ruppert commented on OFBIZ-3560:
This was removed in the original patch - please
On Mar 18, 2010, at 7:57 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Marc Morin wrote:
I loath to enter into this discussion, but feel that I need to put in a bit
of experience that I have observed when dealing with databases and migration
issues.
There are a couple of truisms that I have come to accept,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Ruppert updated OFBIZ-3560:
---
Attachment: communityOnlyHomePage.patch
Update the Home Page to link to the Service Providers
: site
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Reporter: Tim Ruppert
Assignee: Tim Ruppert
Priority: Minor
Attachments: communityOnlyHomePage.patch
Update the home page to be focused on the community rather than the service
providers and their news:
# Remove
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12846555#action_12846555
]
Tim Ruppert commented on OFBIZ-3560:
Agreed - Jacques, I'll add that back
In commit r924312, we have followed David's precedent and removed all HotWax
Media links on the home page of OFBiz - mean to help ensure that the project is
focused on the community and not the providers. Here is a link to a new JIRA
task that I am looking to commit along these lines - later
+1
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 17, 2010, at 6:02 PM, David E Jones wrote:
BTW, maybe it wasn't clear in my other messages but I am against these
guidelines. For a reason why take a look at which news items would have been
left in and which would have been removed.
IMO if it's going to be a
This other stuff should definitely be in the wiki - and we should drive people
there IMO. Easier to administer and work on as a larger group.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 17, 2010, at 6:23 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
We seem to be at an impasse here as we can't even agree on what is news.
IMHO, the
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Tim Ruppert
tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
Just wanted to bump this since we're now approaching the middle of the
month. Ashish, if you can point Hans to your writeup I'm sure this will
help get this party started.
I'd really
Jacques / Ruth, this still points to the home page instead of any particular
thread where anyone can go read about this. This is why we removed the other
myofbiz entry early last week. Is this something that we can adjust that might
take the user to this content right away instead of pushing
+1 - and thanks for laying it out Ean. I guess the only question remains is
what stops us from moving in this direction if we can achieve exactly what
Ean's talking about? This sounds like something that would allow all of us the
ability to manage the pieces we want to without polluting the
. Anyways,
thanks for the info gents - it was informative and something I'd like to look
further into for sure.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 11, 2010, at 9:57 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
Tim Ruppert wrote:
+1 - and thanks for laying it out Ean. I guess the only question remains is
what stops us from
Let's fix the problem. When at Contegix we ran 3 demos concurrently, and
multiple versions of the Confluence server which eats memory - so the problem
is in the setup. With 2.5 GB we should be able to run both the demo and stable
release branch successfully - but we've got to find this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12843582#action_12843582
]
Tim Ruppert commented on OFBIZ-3540:
Thanks David for doing this. Marc
,
Ruppert
On Feb 25, 2010, at 12:25 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
Great - looking forward to hearing more next week - good luck on the rest of
it.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Feb 25, 2010, at 12:19 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Hi Ruppert,
can at the moment only repeat what i said before...let us first finish
Man I hope not! That's one of the reasons that ever working with OpenTaps
sucks. If someone wants to do that, please put it somewhere where most of us
don't have to get it so that we can continue to develop in a cleaner
environment. This is a huge one that would need to be discussed before
pretty easily.
I would prefer not to be forced into going the GWT route - so what I was
saying, is let's keep it out of regular usage for as long as possible.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Mar 10, 2010, at 4:13 PM, chris
to do something useful. It would be a crying
shame if we lost the features I listed above because of otherwise minor
imperfections in their construction.
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 01:48 -0700, Tim Ruppert wrote:
Please send me the credentials as well - I'd like to update the Bio and
make
On Mar 10, 2010, at 6:44 PM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
Tim Ruppert wrote:
Man I hope not! That's one of the reasons that ever working with OpenTaps
sucks. If someone wants to do that, please put it somewhere where most of
us don't have to get it so that we can continue to develop
got to do it or this project will just fall apart.
-Not David
On Mar 10, 2010, at 5:44 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
Still looking forward to discussing and rectifying how we have two ebay
stores and how that's just something I'm supposed to be happy about - even
if it could be a job
From: Tim Ruppert tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com
Just another heads up in this thread - we're now at the 18th - and I'm not
sure that bigfiles, etc have all been setup over there. Just don't want
anyone to get the gotcha.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http
You have seen the email from Jacopo telling you why this can and should be
revered. If you'd like me to resend that again, I can do it - but this commit
has been turned down by many other committers - not just me, Hans. I have also
modeled the appropriate behavior here on the Service
To be clear, I was going to post your twitter feeds to that Service Providers
spot but didn't want to step on your toes if you didn't want to list all of
them. Let me know if I can help you to get that all sorted out.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 8, 2010, at 7:30 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
You have
We really just need to fix the monitoring and everything around it. I'm
working the process with infra getting everything setup - but it will take some
time even once it's ready. In the meantime, thanks to everyone who is keeping
it up. Jacques / Hans, could you email me privately and help
Inline
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 7, 2010, at 7:35 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Tim Ruppert tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com
It IS news when there is a new tutorial out there. It is not news when you
are doing marketing. That sounds like a reasonable place to draw the line.
For instance, I
Through all of this discussion of legal misrepresentation and difficulties
getting all of the right people looped into decisions made for the project, I
want to stop and take a moment to acknowledge the fact that Hans went outside
of strictly his needs and decided to get a twitter account for
Integrator-- Glad to Assist
Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man
Linkedin
http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=key=1237480locale=en_UStrk=tab_pro
Tim Ruppert sent the following on 3/7/2010 7:12 AM:
Through all of this discussion of legal misrepresentation and difficulties
getting all
1 - 100 of 720 matches
Mail list logo
