FYI cabin doors (plane) are closing back online in the morning.
On Monday, November 19, 2012, David Blevins wrote:
At this point we draft up a board resolution to amend our TLP name and
description and vote on it. Then we wait till next board meeting till its
official.
The next board
Any more thoughts on this?
-David
On Nov 15, 2012, at 8:22 AM, stratwine tovishwan...@gmail.com wrote:
Jonathan Gallimore-2 wrote
I think renaming the TLP makes sense as TomEE is getting a lot of
attention
from the public now, and having it under OpenEJB has the potential to be a
little
identity -- the website says TomEE in letters as big as my hand
was one quote. This was many months ago and my feedback then was we're still
experimenting and we need time to figure ourselves out.
It's been a year since TomEE has been released and officially certified. The
popularity
Thats already covered in this thread, code related to openejb will stay
with openejb package names and the same goes for TomEE
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
So, what's the consensus on the package naming?
Regards,
Alan
On Nov 18, 2012, at 6:46
On Nov 14, 2012, at 8:30 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
If people on both projects are the same not sure it makes so much
sense...and tomee code is really really small and doesnt do enough work to
let it be another project IMO (in fact it only does integration so fixes
Fully agree.
TomEE as a TLP and OpenEJB as a subproject is the preferable solution IMHO.
JLouis
2012/11/14 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
Hmm,
If people on both projects are the same not sure it makes so much
sense...and tomee code is really really small and doesnt do enough work
+1 for TomEE being the TLP and OpenEJB its subproject.
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 7:04 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
Since it came up in the other thread, good time to officially raise the
discussion on how we want to identify ourselves as a TLP.
There have been concerns
Jonathan Gallimore-2 wrote
I think renaming the TLP makes sense as TomEE is getting a lot of
attention
from the public now, and having it under OpenEJB has the potential to be a
little confusing unless you're aware of the history of the project.
+1 for the renaming
-Vishwa
--
View
Since it came up in the other thread, good time to officially raise the
discussion on how we want to identify ourselves as a TLP.
There have been concerns raised on how we identify to the public in terms of
our primary identity -- the website says TomEE in letters as big as my hand
was one
+1. I definitely agree with that. TomEE seems to be the main project
project now and identifying it as the top level project makes sense to me.
Jon
On Nov 13, 2012 3:05 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
Since it came up in the other thread, good time to officially raise
+1 on the idea but Romain pointed to a main point which is the technical
implications when it comes to stg like module names and package names, etc
I would say core code should still be openejb and code solely related to
tomee should be renamed
another point that is raised on the other thread
tveronezi jlmonteiro, rmannibucau: can you guys check if I did it right?
[]s,
Thiago.
-- Forwarded message --
From: tveron...@apache.org
Date: Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:59 PM
Subject: svn commit: r1408860 - in /openejb/trunk/openejb: ./
tomee/tomee-webapp/src/main/webapp/ tomee
should still be openejb and code solely related to
tomee should be renamed
another point that is raised on the other thread of project renaming which
raised by some one who is using and heavily depending on tomee wouldn't
that affect them ?
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S3
Apologies for any typos
I don't think any modules need changing as they stand at the moment as the
core code is clearly labelled as openejb, and TomEE specific code sits
within a TomEE module.
I guess the top level svn URL may change, but that should only need an 'svn
switch' if that's the case.
I think renaming
as the
core code is clearly labelled as openejb, and TomEE specific code sits
within a TomEE module.
I guess the top level svn URL may change, but that should only need an 'svn
switch' if that's the case.
I think renaming the TLP makes sense as TomEE is getting a lot of attention
from the public
...@gmail.com
a écrit :
I don't think any modules need changing as they stand at the moment as
the
core code is clearly labelled as openejb, and TomEE specific code sits
within a TomEE module.
I am not active on code so didn't know that. In that case this is perfect
then.
I guess the top level
Hi folks!
A quick note about getting tomee a bit faster in big real world scenarios.
Tomcat 7.0.23 introduced a parallel start feature.
Please change to the following in your conf/server.xml:
Host name=localhost appBase=webapps
unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true startStopThreads
What about having 2 TLPs?
Actually OpenEJB is still very valuable as own standalone project.
So I'd rather go for having TomEE AND OpenEJB as TLPs.
It is already pretty much separated from the build structure.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: David Blevins david.blev
Hi Mark,
That's nice! Thanks for the tip!
Jon
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi folks!
A quick note about getting tomee a bit faster in big real world scenarios.
Tomcat 7.0.23 introduced a parallel start feature.
Please change to the following
Hmm,
If people on both projects are the same not sure it makes so much
sense...and tomee code is really really small and doesnt do enough work to
let it be another project IMO (in fact it only does integration so fixes
are mainly in openejb)
Wdyt?
Le 13 nov. 2012 23:45, Mark Struberg strub
Hey guys,
As discuss many times, a new release has to be done.
Spent time with David yesterday on the release process and all wrapping
tools he put around for the project.
Then, I started looking how it will be and saw some stuff to fix/clarify
regarding the new webapp.
Thiago, it looks like you
for any typos
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sönmez, Hayri h.soen...@fraport.de
Date: Nov 5, 2012 4:15 PM
Subject: Websphere to TomEE struggling
To: nour.moham...@gmail.com nour.moham...@gmail.com
Selam Mohammad,
I am looking (already searched in the mailing list too) to find an easy
Samsung Galaxy S3
Apologies for any typos
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sönmez, Hayri h.soen...@fraport.de
Date: Nov 5, 2012 4:15 PM
Subject: Websphere to TomEE struggling
To: nour.moham...@gmail.com nour.moham...@gmail.com
Selam Mohammad,
I am looking (already searched
nearly impossible to talk about TomEE+ in general and do
demos afterwards. Tried it twice in a row - for JDD last Thursday and
today on JavaDay in Kiev - and almost found time for the stuff I speak
about now. Gotta be faster I believe, but it could be for less
understanding of the audience.
3
) remote ejb
I'll add a slide and demo for this, but given the time constraints (50
minutes) it's nearly impossible to talk about TomEE+ in general and do
demos afterwards. Tried it twice in a row - for JDD last Thursday and
today on JavaDay in Kiev - and almost found time for the stuff I speak
Hi,
This shpuld have been a warn, the app should still work. Btw thats fixed on
trunk
Le 25 oct. 2012 06:19, Enrico Olivelli - Diennea
enrico.olive...@diennea.com a écrit :
Hi all,
I started to upgrade my tomee from 1.0 to 1.5
First run on 1.5
I'm now at work and I have not TomEE
Well I saw a somehow, IMHO biased comparison between WebSphere Liberty
Profile and Apache Tomcat. Both were positioned as app servers. I
asked why they don't compare app servers with app servers (i.e.
Liberty Profile with Apache TomEE) instead of app servers with servlet
containers. The answer
/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
-- Forwarded message --
From: Romain Manni-Bucau (JIRA) j...@apache.org
Date: 2012/10/24
Subject: [jira] [Updated] (TOMEE-501) Implement openjpa load-time
enhancement by means of PersistenceUnitInfo.addTransformer(ClassTransformer
Hi all,
I started to upgrade my tomee from 1.0 to 1.5
First run on 1.5
I'm now at work and I have not TomEE source code, can you give me some
suggestion ?
This is the error
javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: Name global not found
from my point of view yes, i'd let the whole app secured (excepted /ejb).
You know now the tomee user is added automatically in dev mode so no need
to tweak the tomcat-users.xml (or any other conf) by default. Butif
configured in secured mode you need to do the conf.
what others thinks
Hi Guys,
Just noticed the use of the paw-print logo in the photo from Jean-Louis' TomEE
talk!
Can we use this logo on our site now to promote TomEE?
Are we all agreeing it's the official logo (for now anyway)?
Best Regards,
Neale
Hi,
From my understanding Yes. At least I used it.
Jlouis
Le 17 oct. 2012 18:54, Neale Rudd ne...@metawerx.net a écrit :
Hi Guys,
Just noticed the use of the paw-print logo in the photo from Jean-Louis'
TomEE talk!
Can we use this logo on our site now to promote TomEE?
Are we all
Ok well we're going to put it up. It's a great logo.
Any objections?
Best Regards,
Neale
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com
To: dev@openejb.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 5:00 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE Logo
Hi,
From my understanding Yes
I am trying to configure ActiveMQ under TomEE.
Running into all sorts of problems.
TomEE is run from within Eclipse (via Server configuration).
1) Embedded ActiveMQ broker wouldn't start
Following online documentation and examples I configured MQ the following
way:
tomee.xml:
Resource id
://github.com/rmannibucau*
2012/10/16 tomilchik tomilc...@gmail.com
I am trying to configure ActiveMQ under TomEE.
Running into all sorts of problems.
TomEE is run from within Eclipse (via Server configuration).
1) Embedded ActiveMQ broker wouldn't start
Following online documentation
)
at javax.naming.InitialContext.lookup(Unknown Source)
at sandbox.TestJMS.main(TestJMS.java:36)
???
BTW - an update on Datasource:
Turned out I *must* define a datasource called Default Unmanaged JDBC
Database.
Specifying Datasource= results in TomEE still wanting to use a datasource;
specifying Datasource
Hi Guys,
Just thought you'd like to know we've just had our first 1.5 customer signup
today!
Plan selection was Starter (128mb MaxHeap, 64mb MaxPerm, 48mb MaxCodeCache,
MySQL 5.5).
TomEE started up nice and fast and plugged straight in to our dashboard tools
without any problems.
After
).
TomEE started up nice and fast and plugged straight in to our dashboard
tools without any problems.
After a fresh install it's sitting at:
Heap: 54mb allocated, 18-47 in use (changes every minute)
Perm: 51mb allocated, 27mb in use
CC: 8mb allocated, 1mb in use
... so looks nice
For sure Stephen, go ahead.
JLouis
2012/10/10 Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
There are a couple of bits of low hanging fruit and I have a limited (few)
number of cycles. I will create issues for anything I think I can make
progress and I hope that some committers will help
Neale,
digest seems to work for me,
i put in tomcat-users.xml:
role rolename=tomee-admin /
user username=tomee password=tomee roles=tomee-admin,manager-gui /
and in webapps/tomee/WEB-INF/web.xml:
login-config
auth-methodDIGEST/auth-method
realm-nameTomEE Webapp/realm-name
Hello,
Has onyone try to run tomee on openshift cloud? I started tomee success
there and easy (servlet, jsp, spring -mvc) applications works fine. But
when I deploy application contains ejb or jpa jvm fail. This cloud looks
fine, but is it possible to use it with tomee?
Best Regards
sw
doing the same i did with cloudfoundry should work but i think nobody done
it today: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/2012/10/09/tomee-on-cloudfoundry/
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http
.
JLouis
2012/10/9 slawek s.wojciechow...@gmail.com
Hello,
Has onyone try to run tomee on openshift cloud? I started tomee success
there and easy (servlet, jsp, spring -mvc) applications works fine. But
when I deploy application contains ejb or jpa jvm fail. This cloud looks
fine
.
OpenShift is definitely another candidate and we'd like to also give it a
try.
If you have some request/hints/ etc
Let us know so that it will be easier.
JLouis
2012/10/9 slawek s.wojciechow...@gmail.com
Hello,
Has onyone try to run tomee on openshift cloud? I started tomee success
.
JLouis
2012/10/9 slawek s.wojciechow...@gmail.com
Hello,
Has onyone try to run tomee on openshift cloud? I started tomee success
there and easy (servlet, jsp, spring -mvc) applications works fine. But
when I deploy application contains ejb or jpa jvm fail. This cloud looks
fine
easily and in an efficient
manner.
OpenShift is definitely another candidate and we'd like to also give it a
try.
If you have some request/hints/ etc
Let us know so that it will be easier.
JLouis
2012/10/9 slawek s.wojciechow...@gmail.com
Hello,
Has onyone try to run tomee
to also give it a
try.
If you have some request/hints/ etc
Let us know so that it will be easier.
JLouis
2012/10/9 slawek s.wojciechow...@gmail.com
Hello,
Has onyone try to run tomee on openshift cloud? I started tomee success
there and easy (servlet, jsp, spring -mvc
in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/tomee-on-openshift-tp4657935p4657945.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi David,
I wrote the announcements and sent them to you but did not get any feedback.
WDYT about them? Should I re write new ones?
Any feedback would be appreciated.
For others, here is the first draft I wrote.
http://openejb.staging.apache.org/tomee-1.5.0.html
Jean-Louis
2012/10/2 David
.
http://openejb.staging.apache.org/tomee-1.5.0.html
Jean-Louis
2012/10/2 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Ok, vote passes with 10 +1s and no other votes!
+1s
Jean-Louis Monteiro
David Blevins
Dain Sundstrom
Jeff Genender
Romain Manni-Bucau
Jonathan Gallimore
Alan
,
I wrote the announcements and sent them to you but did not get any
feedback.
WDYT about them? Should I re write new ones?
Any feedback would be appreciated.
For others, here is the first draft I wrote.
http://openejb.staging.apache.org/tomee-1.5.0.html
Jean-Louis
2012/10/2
.
For others, here is the first draft I wrote.
http://openejb.staging.apache.org/tomee-1.5.0.html
Jean-Louis
2012/10/2 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Ok, vote passes with 10 +1s and no other votes!
+1s
Jean-Louis Monteiro
David Blevins
Dain
.
For others, here is the first draft I wrote.
http://openejb.staging.apache.org/tomee-1.5.0.html
Jean-Louis
2012/10/2 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Ok, vote passes with 10 +1s and no other votes!
+1s
Jean-Louis Monteiro
David
to you but did not get any
feedback.
WDYT about them? Should I re write new ones?
Any feedback would be appreciated.
For others, here is the first draft I wrote.
http://openejb.staging.apache.org/tomee-1.5.0.html
Jean-Louis
2012/10/2 David
we have to,
not sure i'll get time to work a bit on it before some days (maybe weeks).
if you want to give it a first try just push us some markdown pages and
we'll update/review them and push them :)
Since we did it together i think it can be interesting to see some end user
text instead of
Hi guys,
Following what we decided 4 months ago (more than 40 days).
So even if someone else disagree, the paw-print will be used as the
official Apache TomEE logo.
Jean-Louis
2012/6/4 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
i globally agree even if i would have had it on the 12th
So even if someone else disagree, the paw-print will be used as the
official Apache TomEE logo.
Sorry, wrong sentence, the good one is:
So except if someone disagree, the paw-print will be used as the official
Apache TomEE logo.
JLouis
2012/10/8 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com
Hi
as the
official Apache TomEE logo.
Sorry, wrong sentence, the good one is:
So except if someone disagree, the paw-print will be used as the official
Apache TomEE logo.
JLouis
2012/10/8 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com
Hi guys,
Following what we decided 4 months ago (more than 40
as the
official Apache TomEE logo.
Sorry, wrong sentence, the good one is:
So except if someone disagree, the paw-print will be used as the official
Apache TomEE logo.
JLouis
2012/10/8 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com
Hi guys,
Following what we decided 4 months ago
-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com
wrote:
So even if someone else disagree, the paw-print will be used as the
official Apache TomEE logo.
Sorry, wrong sentence, the good one is:
So except if someone disagree, the paw-print will be used as the
official
Apache TomEE logo.
JLouis
+1
- Original Message -
From: Thiago Veronezi thi...@veronezi.org
To: dev@openejb.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 4:21 AM
Subject: Re: [RESULT] Paw-print logo to become official TomEE logo
+1
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote
about security, or who don't
have any incentive to care about it. And as the popularity of
TomEE grows, the impact of such people deploying TomEE will
also grow. The consequences of that must be weighed against
the inconvenience of the developer's need to relax the security
settings.
--
Bjorn
.
-David
On Oct 8, 2012, at 8:19 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Hi guys,
Following what we decided 4 months ago (more than 40 days).
So even if someone else disagree, the paw-print will be used as the
official Apache TomEE logo.
Jean-Louis
2012/6/4 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu
Sorry David, but we have been talking about that for months.
Some people already voted for the paw-print.
Maybe they voted here on the idea to actually close the vote :D
That's really important IMO to get something for TomEE.
If you think that is important we can push a new VOTE on the list
://openejb.staging.apache.org/tomee-1.5.0.html
Hacked on it some last night along with trying to get the list of jiras
generated and on the downloads page
http://openejb.staging.apache.org/tomee-1.5.0.html
On the JAX-RS certification note, I saw Lance at JavaOne (TCK certification
guy). We're good on the JAX
on the idea to actually close the vote :D
That's really important IMO to get something for TomEE.
If you think that is important we can push a new VOTE on the list and let
it open for 72 hours as usual.
but to be honest I don't think at all we'll get more votes.
Jean-Louis
2012/10/8 David
.
For others, here is the first draft I wrote.
http://openejb.staging.apache.org/tomee-1.5.0.html
Hacked on it some last night along with trying to get the list of jiras
generated and on the downloads page
http://openejb.staging.apache.org/tomee-1.5.0.html
On the JAX-RS certification note
On Oct 8, 2012, at 10:57 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Sorry David, but we have been talking about that for months.
Some people already voted for the paw-print.
Maybe they voted here on the idea to actually close the vote :D
That's really important IMO to get something for TomEE
a competition, or if
it's unanimous for the paw-print, maybe just go with it?
I personally love the paw-print and want to post it on the metawerx site to
promote TomEE (with your permission of course! ;-)
Best Regards,
Neale
- Original Message -
From: David Blevins david.blev
Hi Guys,
Ok I found the logos Romain originally posted.
http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/graphic/
Can someone post this out to the wider community and start a [VOTE] thread?
As David said, we seem to have a consensus already, but to follow the Apache
by-laws, let's send it out.
I
On Oct 8, 2012, at 11:27 AM, Neale Rudd wrote:
I'll put them on a URL within the next hour if you can send it quickly,
otherwise tomorrow. Someone else can count the votes over the next 72 hours.
If there is a too-close vote, maybe it's better to run a competition, or if
it's unanimous
+1 use the paw then add on the site challenge our logo
Le 8 oct. 2012 20:52, Neale Rudd ne...@metawerx.net a écrit :
Hi Guys,
Ok I found the logos Romain originally posted.
http://people.apache.org/~**rmannibucau/graphic/http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/graphic/
Can someone post this
there who have very little clues about security, or who don't
have any incentive to care about it. And as the popularity of
TomEE grows, the impact of such people deploying TomEE will
also grow. The consequences of that must be weighed against
the inconvenience of the developer's need to relax
Hi Thiago,
will this new console be bundled in TomEE 1.1 ?
- Enrico
Il 06/10/2012 19:45, Thiago Veronezi ha scritto:
Hi guys!
I hope this new way of implementing the UI will help us to bring more help
from the community.
I re-re-implemented the Console page with this new approach. Basically
(JIRA) j...@apache.org
wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-447?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thiago Veronezi resolved TOMEE-447.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Using Handlebars
Thiago,
will this new console be bundled in TomEE 1.1 ?
- Enrico
Il 06/10/2012 19:45, Thiago Veronezi ha scritto:
Hi guys!
I hope this new way of implementing the UI will help us to bring more help
from the community.
I re-re-implemented the Console page with this new approach. Basically
...@gmail.com a écrit :
This would be acceptable to postpone this JIRA after 1.5.1 if you could add
an Hardening TomEE security item in documentation and list there the
steps we have in mind for the profile management tool in a future release.
Providing this type of information will give more credits
Sorry Thiago,
I mispelled 1.1 I was meaning 1.5. I didn't catch the release of 1.5, I
was thinking I was only a RC.
Congratulations to you all
I hope I will be able to upgrade my apps to TomEE 1.5 soon
- Enrico
Il 07/10/2012 09:47, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO ha scritto:
Hi Enrico,
No 1.1
Hi,
are you going to update http://tomee.apache.org/documentation.html to
reflect new features (new configuration, support for including Hibernate
in WEB-INF/lib,quartz configuration, cluster deploment, LazyRealm ?)
I'm going to teach my collegues all this new features
thank you very
JIRA is already filled :https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-450
Regarding the doc, not sure how I could help : do you mean i could be
granted write access to it?
How? who grants? who reviews?
Alex
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.comwrote:
Fully agree
There is a edit button on the doc and your change will be sent then
accepted.
If you need new pages simply ask ;)
Le 7 oct. 2012 20:56, Alex The Rocker alex.m3...@gmail.com a écrit :
JIRA is already filled :https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-450
Regarding the doc, not sure how I could
ui version available in case the user access the
application with an old browser.
wdyt?
[]s,
Thiago.
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Thiago Veronezi (JIRA) j...@apache.orgwrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-447?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all
Hello,
This is to continue the discussion started in users@ list around JIRA
improvement item https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-450
I'm a bit surprised by Romain's statement that TomEE is primarily used by
developers : I thought that in real world there are more app servers used
hmm that's not exactly what i said Alex :p
on a project you generally have N (5) developpers using the container to
develop (let say with tomee-maven-pugin or WTP or something else...)
then when it is about production you have 2-3 people configuring the server
then it can be deployed in cluster
Okay, i agree with that. So how about a profile management tool to generate
a TomEE configuration with minimal surface of attack?
Alex
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
hmm that's not exactly what i said Alex :p
on a project you generally have N (5
management tool to generate
a TomEE configuration with minimal surface of attack?
Alex
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:
hmm that's not exactly what i said Alex :p
on a project you generally have N (5) developpers using the container
This would be acceptable to postpone this JIRA after 1.5.1 if you could add
an Hardening TomEE security item in documentation and list there the
steps we have in mind for the profile management tool in a future release.
Providing this type of information will give more credits to TomEE as
suitable
+1
[]s,
Thiago.
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 1:12 PM, dsh daniel.hais...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Cheers
Daniel
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:40 PM, dblev...@apache.org wrote:
[generated email]
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-4.5.0/
Maven Repo:
+1
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Thiago Veronezi thi...@veronezi.org wrote:
+1
[]s,
Thiago.
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 1:12 PM, dsh daniel.hais...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Cheers
Daniel
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:40 PM, dblev...@apache.org wrote:
[generated email]
SVN Tag:
Ok, vote passes with 10 +1s and no other votes!
+1s
Jean-Louis Monteiro
David Blevins
Dain Sundstrom
Jeff Genender
Romain Manni-Bucau
Jonathan Gallimore
Alan Cabrera
Daniel Haischt
Thiago Veronezi
Karan Malhi
Will push all the binaries. Then we need to wait a bit for the mirrors to
sync. We
+1
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 10:40 PM, dblev...@apache.org wrote:
[generated email]
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-4.5.0/
Maven Repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-060
Binaries Source:
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 28, 2012, at 2:40 PM, dblev...@apache.org wrote:
[generated email]
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-4.5.0/
Maven Repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-060
Binaries Source:
+1
Cheers
Daniel
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:40 PM, dblev...@apache.org wrote:
[generated email]
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-4.5.0/
Maven Repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-060
Binaries Source:
in Assembler.destroyApplication we skip global bindings for the app and
instead we do:
try {
containerSystem.getJNDIContext().unbind(java:global);
} catch (NamingException ignored) {
// no-op
}
shouldn't be done IMO (otherwise it means 1 app / container).
fixed on trunk and in the branch
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
2012/9/28 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
in Assembler.destroyApplication
] [Closed] (TOMEE-434) when using DeployerEjb the JNDI tree
is the DeployerEjb one and not the deployed app one
To: comm...@openejb.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel]
Romain Manni-Bucau closed TOMEE-434
Alright. Went ahead and re-rolled. This pushes us out to Monday for a vote
close. Hopefully we don't have anymore issues.
At this point I'd say we should probably consider anything that isn't a serious
regression as a good thing for next release.
-David
On Sep 28, 2012, at 1:51 AM, Romain
[generated email]
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-4.5.0/
Maven Repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-060
Binaries Source:
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/staging-060/openejb-4.5.0/
Legal:
Agree.
Here is my +1
JLouis
2012/9/28 dblev...@apache.org
[generated email]
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-4.5.0/
Maven Repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-060
Binaries Source:
TCK run from trunk post-change passed. A run from the staging-060 binaries is
in progress and looks good. Build looks good.
Here's my +1
-David
On Sep 28, 2012, at 4:40 PM, dblev...@apache.org wrote:
[generated email]
SVN Tag:
101 - 200 of 840 matches
Mail list logo
