Increase minimum Java version from 5 to 7/8 ?

Hi Currently our Java policy [1] mandates a baseline of Java 5, which was released in 2004, and was EOL from 2008; even paid Oracle customers stopped getting updates in 2015 [2]. There are many language and class library improvements in later versions of Java that we would benefit from in AOO, an

Re: Increase minimum Java version from 5 to 7/8 ?

On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Damjan, > > I can only comment on a non-technical POV... > > Am 09.07.2017 um 14:53 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > Hi > > > > Currently our Java policy [1] mandates a baseline of Java 5, which was >

Re: Increase minimum Java version from 5 to 7/8 ?

On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Am 09.07.2017 um 18:07 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Matthias Seidel < > matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Damjan, > >> > >>

Re: OpenOffice Query

ul 6, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Rushna Jabi > wrote: > >> OK,I am working on this. >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Damjan Jovanovic >> wrote: >> >>> You're looking for this then: >>> https://wiki.open

Re: OpenOffice Query

ir for your guidance... > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > Rushna Jabi > Software Programmer > 8447294601 > > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Damjan Jovanovic > wrote: > >> Please see my attached example. I tested it and it does work. >>

Re: OpenOffice Query

m getting popup on save, on saveAs event after the saving doc. > But I want my popup before save event window.. > How is it possible? > > > > > > Regards, > Rushna jabi > Software Engineer > 8447294604 > > On 13-Jul-2017 15:03, "Damjan Jovanovic" wrote:

Eclipse vs other IDEs (was: Re: Ide for Open Office (was Building OO))

g to do the same on W7 x32. > >>> > >>>As Id like to deep dive into OO development, could you please share > >>>what dev environment do you use on Ubuntu and on W7 (I believe, that > >>>I'll finally success in building OO on Windows). > >&g

Re: Eclipse vs other IDEs (was: Re: Ide for Open Office (was Building OO))

gt;I have extensively used visual studio for 5+ years as a pure C++ > >developers. Even Eclipse is quite good and used it in my earlier > >android programming days although I find eclipse slower than visual > >studio. But I think both of them are excellent IDE and one can use any > &g

Re: Eclipse vs other IDEs (was: Re: Ide for Open Office (was Building OO))

C. Eclipse invested serious development effort into its Eclipse CDT parser, even writing static analysis tools with it and developing code refactoring. How good is Netbeans? On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > On 7/19/17, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > What is so "v

Drop the KDE address book?

Hi Our KDE address book database driver (main/connectivity/source/drivers/kab) only supports the KDE 3.2 - 3.6 address book API, not the more recent 4 and 5 which apparently use DBUS instead. KDE 4 has been out since 2008, so the KDE address book hasn't been working for KDE users for the past 9 y

Re: Building OO

alhelper/condition.hxx(29) : fatal error C1083: Cannot open > include file: 'osl/conditn.h': No such file or directory > > dmake: Error code 2, while making '../wntmsci12.pro/slo/condition.obj' > > > > 1 module(s): > > salhelper > &g

Re: Building OO

configuration. > > I think we are all following the steps described here: > > https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_ > Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Windows_7.2C_Windows_8.1.2C_Windows_10 > > If you do something different, could you update the Wiki? > > Regards, Matthias &

Re: Drop the KDE address book?

. > > > >Matthias > > > > > >Am 20.07.2017 um 10:23 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > >> Hi > >> > >> Our KDE address book database driver > >(main/connectivity/source/drivers/kab) > >> only supports the KDE 3.2 - 3.6 address book A

Re: Drop the KDE address book?

rface alone, and the com.sun.star.sdbc and com.sun.star.sdbcx modules have many services with many interfaces. On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Peter kovacs wrote: > I mean can we today access KDE adressbook in version 4 or 5. > > Am 20. Juli 2017 17:54:16 MESZ schrieb Damjan Jovanovic >:

Re: Drop the KDE address book?

It's been removed in revision 1802537. On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Hi > > Our KDE address book database driver (main/connectivity/source/drivers/kab) > only supports the KDE 3.2 - 3.6 address book API, not the more recent 4 and > 5 which

Building Java code: Ant improvements, and better IDE integration

Hi Building AOO's Java code is currently mostly done with dmake and gbuild. Both are ugly, unsupported by Java IDEs, and impossibly problematic with some development I've been doing, so I began looking for an alternative. It turns out we also have Ant, which is well established, supported by most

Re: Building OO

;>>>>> > >>>>>> Reason(s): > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making > /cygdrive/c/source/aoo-trunk/ext_libraries/gtest > >>>>>> > >>>>>> When you have

Re: Building OO

On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 10:57 PM, Matthias Seidel < matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote: > Am 13.08.2017 um 10:57 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > :(. > > gmake version? > > --- > $ gmake > -bash: gmake: Kommando nicht gefunden. > --- > > Where should gmake c

Committed: new database driver for PostgreSQL, SDBCX API for Java

Hi In revision 1805579 I committed a large patch to AOO, that implements a whole new database connector, for the PostgreSQL database. It's the real deal, a new UNO component, 57 files, 9607 lines of code, about 4 months in the pipeline. It's 100% in Java, and while developing it I've also written

Re: Committed: new database driver for PostgreSQL, SDBCX API for Java

--from apache-commons > > --- > dmake: Error: -- > `../../wntmsci12.pro/misc/4c8c505cc3cba4c467c479e3e0f09ba4-commons-lang3-3.3-src.unpack' > not found, and can't be made > --- > > Regards, Matthias > > > Am 20.08.2017 um 21:34 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: &

Re: Committed: new database driver for PostgreSQL, SDBCX API for Java

is running at the moment. Looks good so far! > > If it is successful Rev. 1805579 can be found here: > https://www.openoffice.org/download/devbuilds.html > > Matthias > > > Am 21.08.2017 um 17:09 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > My module uses Apache Commons Lang. May

Re: Committed: new database driver for PostgreSQL, SDBCX API for Java

The toUnsignedXxx() methods are from Java 8 :-/. Maybe I can rewrite that part of the code to use 7. On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Matthias Seidel < matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote: > Am 21.08.2017 um 19:14 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > Yes. Well done on finding it. Y

Re: Committed: new database driver for PostgreSQL, SDBCX API for Java

I've patched external_deps.lst, and as of revision 1805933, AOO should build even without --enable-wiki-publisher. On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Matthias Seidel < matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote: > Am 21.08.2017 um 19:14 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > Yes. Well done on

Re: [Discussion] build tool

On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hello all, > > To be honest I am not very happy with gmake and ant. It is difficult to > add the functionality to Eclipse. Also we stay dependant for Windows on > Cygwin or Windows Subsystem for Linux, which feels to me awkward. Also > if we w

Re: Error in Linux64 bot

Nice catch. connectivity/util didn't have a dependency on connectivity/java/sdbc_postgresql, sometimes causing it to build in the wrong order and fail. Should be fixed in revision 1807949. Thank you Damjan On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Damjan, > > Today our Linux6

Re: Linux32 buildbots time out (fixed)

That's great news :) On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 10:54 PM, Matthias Seidel < matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote: > The problem is fixed! > RPMbuild had issues and therefore the bots timed out... > > We now have a full set of new Linux32 builds uploaded: > > https://www.openoffice.org/download/devbuild

[Discussion] Switch to Git?

Hi Can we please switch to using Git instead of Subversion for AOO's source? I don't know how much justification you want/need. Git is huge nowdays, by far the most popular VCS worldwide, the one most developers know and IDEs support (https://rhodecode.com/insights/version-control-systems-2016).

Re: [Discussion] Switch to Git?

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > I know Git is the repository-of-the-decade, and therefore a switch to it > is probably inevitable, just like the switch from RCS to SCCS and from SCCS > to Subversion. > > Just as a matter of curiosity, which IDE's do not support Subvers

Re: [Discussion] Switch to Git?

to Git >> >> PS: >> As Apache project the code has to be at the ASF. I think it's not >> possible to store it somewhere else like, e.g., GitHub. >> >> Marcus >> >> >> >> Am 14.09.2017 um 19:24 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >> >>> >&g

Re: [Discussion] Switch to Git?

Yes, git-svn lacks quite a few features and can be problematic. Besides, 1 VCS and 1 way of doing things (ie. Git only everywhere) is always easier to manage than SVN here, a read-only delayed (possibly by months, when it breaks) Git copy on GitHub, and possibly git-svn on the users' end. On Mon,

Re: [Discussion] Switch to Git?

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Herbert Duerr wrote: > On 09/17/2017 04:04 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > On 14/09/2017 Dave Fisher wrote: > >> does SVN vs. GIT prevent new developers from volunteering? > > > > I think this is the key question, even though there are many good points > > also in

Re: [Discussion] Switch to Git?

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > I know Git is the repository-of-the-decade, and therefore a switch to it > is probably inevitable, just like the switch from RCS to SCCS and from SCCS > to Subversion. > > Just as a matter of curiosity, which IDE's do not support Subvers

Re: translated files

Requests for translation are posted to the bug: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=39199 German speaking devs take the file and conduct the translation. Damjan On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Mathias Röllig wrote: > Hello! > > I use Peter's question to ask in the same direction: > > Ho

Re: translated files

If you are a committer, feel free to commit them. Comment translation mistakes are not serious and can always be fixed later. If not, attach the patches to the bug report. And I think we should vote you in. Damjan On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:55 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > I have translated commen

Re: translated files

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Mathias Röllig wrote: > Am 21.09.2017 um 10:38 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > >> Requests for translation are posted to the bug: >> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=39199 >> > > Yes, I can look at the files via Opengrok. I

Re: Java 9 32-bit

Now what: 1. Ship our own builds of OpenJDK, in matching bitness. Do the licences (GPL for JVM, GPL-with-classpath-exception for class library) allow us to? 2. Drop Windows as a platform, since it's the only affected platform (*nix users usually install distro OpenJDK packages so 32 bit OpenJDK wil

Re: Java 9 32-bit

Go for which option? Or do you mean option 4 with the "Go" language? On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Go for it! ;-) > > > Am 03.10.2017 um 15:18 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > Now what: > > 1. Ship our own builds of OpenJDK, in matching

Re: Java 9 32-bit

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Now what: > 1. Ship our own builds of OpenJDK, in matching bitness. Do the licences > (GPL for JVM, GPL-with-classpath-exception for class library) allow us to? > To answer my own question, we can't ship OpenJDK -

Re: Open XML Filter

I've looked at Apache POI before and even wrote a minimal filter that saves text cells in Calc to XLSX, see my email on 22 December 2015. Reading OOXML in Apache POI is problematic, we would have to build the document tree twice, first in POI, then in AOO, as a SAX-like API is not supported, so me

ORbit no longer a build dependency

Hi You no longer need ORbit to build the latest trunk on *nix. It was only ever really used for a version check, which was last needed in ORBit version < 2.8 released in 2003, and I've removed it in SVN revision 1812807. Damjan

Re: Install Notes

Welcome to AOO. What Twitter posting? On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Kenneth Mcfarland < kennethpaulmcfarl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello OpenOffice Team > > Nice work! I kicked LibreOffice to the curb today after seeing the twitter > posting. It's great to be back and use Apache being a contrib

SDBC developments and the JDBC driver port

Hi To update you on my development efforts, the PostgreSQL driver continues to advance. I recently added views and fixed a major problem where "Refresh Tables" causes everything done to tables from then on to fail (as Base keeps holding references to the old table/view/user/group containers, so co

Re: SDBC developments and the JDBC driver port

r build with >--disable-odk or see the dev list archives for possible solutions. > > Either go with Java 7 or use --disable-odk as configure switch. > > Regards, Matthias > > If I can get things working I will be willing to try builds for you on trunk > or a branch as

The new SDBC-JDBC bridge in Java

Hi As of revision 1814552, I've rewritten our formerly C++ based SDBC-JDBC bridge driver in Java. The SDBC-JDBC bridge is there to allows AOO to access databases through Java's JDBC drivers. This port originally aimed at fixing serious issues I discovered in the old C++ implementation, where ther

Re: The new SDBC-JDBC bridge in Java

an resume the build > by running: > > build --from offapi > --- > > I will try to force a build on our buildbot to cross check. > > Regards, Matthias > > > Am 08.11.2017 um 05:34 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > Hi > > > > As of revision 1

Re: The new SDBC-JDBC bridge in Java

Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Damjan, > > I was able to force the Windows buildbot and this is the detailed error > log: > > https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/ > win/main/offapi/wntmsci12.pro/misc/logs/prj.txt > > Regards, Matthias > > > Am 08.11.2017

Re: The new SDBC-JDBC bridge in Java

Apparently I left out that IDL file in my last commit. Sorry. The latest SVN should build now. On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Thank you. There is nothing in that log but "Error 1". > > It builds perfectly on FreeBSD. I'll try a Windows build t

Re: Report of 4.1.4 table problem on BSD

I can reproduce that database wizard problem in trunk :(, although "Create Table in Design View" works (at least for my PostgreSQL driver). This is on PC-BSD 10.3. Any idea what caused it? Damjan On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > A report on Forum of a 4.1.4 table problem

Re: Report of 4.1.4 table problem on BSD

I was wrong, the issue on the forum is not reproducible on either the latest trunk of 1814757, or revision 1774839 from late 2016. The sample tables in the table wizard are supposed to be there and always were. Now let's check 4.1.4. On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:

Simpler Windows builds, oowintool, and Cygwin64

Hi I've committed a few small small fixes to oowintool, mostly for JDK 8 detection and better logging, but I've confirmed that it already works well, and --with-frame-home --with-psdk-home --with-midl-path --with-jdk-home --with-csc-path and --with-cl-home options to ./configure are all unnecessar

Regressions and testing

Hi It seems to me that regressions that we've had with releases recently could have been prevented with judicious testing. We do already have considerable tests in our tree, but they are never run. I've committed a patch that fixes use of junit with hamcrest in both gbuild and dmake, and should

Re: Regressions and testing

o run the "subsequent > tests"? > > On 11/9/2017 9:46 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > >> Hi >> >> It seems to me that regressions that we've had with releases recently >> could >> have been prevented with judicious testing. >> >> We do a

Re: Regressions and testing

We already have a bvt test that writes a spreadsheet with a chart: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/BVT On Friday, November 10, 2017, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > In a module: > OOO_SUBSEQUENT_TESTS=1 build > Results go to main/solver/420/.../workdir/JunitTests for gbuild at least. &g

Re: Dont understand Compiler message

It's some kind of error in gbuild. It really shouldn't happen. Can you try get the full output of "build --from basebmp" without any -P's? Damjan On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:39 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > I tried now > > build --from basebmp > > The error stays persistant independantly if i use a

Re: Simpler Windows builds, oowintool, and Cygwin64

Please test whether the attached patch helps? Regards Damjan On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Damjan, > > Am 10.11.2017 um 06:27 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > Hi > > > > I've committed a few small small fixes to oowintool, mostly fo

Re: Simpler Windows builds, oowintool, and Cygwin64

t; configure: error: cannot guess build type; you must specify one > --- > > I am wondering about the timestamp, our config.guess is from 2009-12-30. > > Regards, Matthias > > > Am 14.11.2017 um 03:06 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > Please test whether the att

Re: Simpler Windows builds, oowintool, and Cygwin64

Committed now, thank you for your help: r1815542 | damjan | 2017-11-17 04:05:43 +0200 (Fri, 17 Nov 2017) | 6 lines Changed paths: M /openoffice/trunk/main/oowintool Allow oowintool to find 32 bit VC++ in Cygwin64. Patch by: Damjan Jovanovic and Matthias Seidel Tested by: Matthias Seidel On

Re: FYI: The OO 4.1.4 Mac problem

Hi I am familiar with the database driver code in main/connectivity, but much less familiar with the Base code main/dbaccess where the problem is. On an unrelated past bug in my code in a main/connectivity driver, I did however briefly encounter that same problem where clicking "Create table" doe

Re: FYI: The OO 4.1.4 Mac problem

rather like to have one time implementation instead of maintain > redundant implementations. > ( the drawback is that bugs have bigger impact. Ofc) > > > Am 17. November 2017 15:26:57 MEZ schrieb Damjan Jovanovic < > dam...@apache.org>: > >Hi > > > >I am familiar w

Debugging Base's "Create Table in Design View"

tl;dr: Put a breakpoint on dbaui::DatabaseObjectView::doDispatch or /full/path/to/main/dbaccess/source/ui/misc/databaseobjectview.cxx:120 just before you click the "Create Table..." button. Step through it in your debugger line by line and document how for you get. Then recursively repeat and step

Re: Debugging Base's "Create Table in Design View"

n sal_main () at main.c:31 #41 0x0040124b in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffbbd8) at main.c:30 On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > tl;dr: > Put a breakpoint on dbaui::DatabaseObjectView::doDispatch or > /full/path/to/main/dbaccess/source/ui/misc/databaseobjectv

Re: Debugging Base's "Create Table in Design View"

u still need my help? Thank you Damjan On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 5:47 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > Is it possible that this is another manifestation of > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127581 > > If so, it will not happen in the trunk. > > > On 11/17/2017 10:

Re: AOO 4.1.5-dev builds

Thank you, but when are these 4.1.x releases going to stop? We have so much lined up for 4.2.0. Damjan On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I have both macOS and Linux-64bit builds of 4.1.5-dev (HEAD on the > AOO415 branch) available for fun and games (and testing) at: > >

Re: AOO 4.1.5-dev builds

> then have to back port the fixes to the 4.1.x line. > > > On 11/22/2017 2:37 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > >> Thank you, but when are these 4.1.x releases going to stop? >> >> We have so much lined up for 4.2.0. >> >> Damjan >> >> On Mon,

Re: AOO 4.1.5-dev builds

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Regarding 4.2.0. What are the new features and is everything being worked > into trunk complete? If we were to decide to release it “quickly” what > needs to be done? > I don't recommend releasing 4.2.0 immediately; maybe in a month or 2 af

Re: AOO 4.2.0-dev builds

CentOS 5 is now EOL, even its maintenance updates ended on 31 March 2017. I think we have to move to CentOS 6. I made GIO the default VFS searched by configure instead of GnomeVFS, as that's what everybody has been using for years; AOO is pretty much the only application still pulling in that anci

Re: AOO 4.2.0-dev builds

When you get that error, before clicking "OK", please attach gdb and run "thread apply all bt", and post the output. Damjan On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Thanks, I could download and install the build now. > > However, the bug [1] is still present for me on Ubuntu 16

Re: another bug in base

I can't reproduce it here, on trunk with: FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) 20140512 Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.3 with either our built-in HSQLDB driver or SQlite over ODBC. What version of AOO are you using? What database driver? What build settings? Damjan O

Re: svn commit: r1815700 - /openoffice/trunk/main/framework/Library_fwk.mk

Who confirmed that it "also affects FreeBSD 10.3 with clang 3.4.1"? If it was me, I was wrong, as I said later in the same email thread. On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Don Lewis wrote: > On 26 Nov, Don Lewis wrote: > > On 26 Nov, Don Lewis wrote: > >> On 18 Nov, j...@apache.org wrote: > >>> Au

Re: 4.2.0: Build for ARM

Raspberry Pis? On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Peter kovacs wrote: > Maybe the patch is interesting to AndroOffice? Anyone from them on our > list? > > In general I'd say that we need a different gui for touch screen devices. > > The other case is I can think of ARM processors is arduino machin

Re: 4.2.0: Build for ARM

What do you mean by category? On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Peter kovacs wrote: > What's the category for those? > > Am 28. November 2017 08:42:17 MEZ schrieb Damjan Jovanovic < > dam...@apache.org>: > >Raspberry Pis? > > > >On Tue, Nov

Re: 4.2.0: Build for ARM

Not sure about the Arduino, but the Raspberry Pi is usable as a desktop computer, with a keyboard/mouse/screen. On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:26 AM, Peter kovacs wrote: > How can anduino and rasperry machines referred to? > > Am 28. November 2017 10:55:21 MEZ schrieb Damjan Jovanovi

Re: AOO 4.2.0-dev builds

Yes it is :) Thank you. On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Am 26.11.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > When you get that error, before clicking "OK", please attach gdb and run > > "thread apply all bt", and post the output.

A more sane way to build - SCons, deCygwination and other hopes

Hi After days of failing to add a few new simple features to gbuild, I've now reached my limits, and have begun experimenting with the SCons build system instead. It's starting to work. Having ported some of gbuild.mk, LinkTarget.mk and platform/freebsd.mk to SCons, as well as a module's local gb

Re: A more sane way to build - SCons, deCygwination and other hopes

On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Playing devils advocate, does it make sense to introduce > Yet Another Build System at this stage? > > I anticipated this question. Firstly, we don't only have dmake and gbuild as our build systems. We also use Ant, meta-build tools like bui

Re: a more sane way to override optimization flags in gbuild

On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > On Dec 2, 2017, at 5:56 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > > > On 30/11/2017 Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> I think for 4.2.x and later, we have deprecated CentOS5 as a supported > >> build system... I ran into a LOT of issues. > > > > Such as, f

Re: 4.2.0: Baseline CentOS6 as reference build platform

> On Dec 3, 2017, at 1:16 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > > On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > >> > >>> On Dec 2, 2017, at 5:56 PM, Andrea Pescetti > wrote: > >>> > >>> On 30/11/2017 Jim Jagielski wrot

Re: 4.2.0: Baseline CentOS6 as reference build platform

Why don't we post that on our www.openoffice.org blog? On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > http://jimjag.com/imo/index.php?/archives/272-The-Path-to- > Apache-OpenOffice-4.2.0.html php?/archives/272-The-Path-to-Apache-OpenOffice-4.2.0.html> > >

Re: A more sane way to build - SCons, deCygwination and other hopes

On Sunday, December 3, 2017, Don Lewis wrote: > On 2 Dec, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > >> Playing devils advocate, does it make sense to introduce > >> Yet Another Build System at this stage? > >

Re: A more sane way to build - SCons, deCygwination and other hopes

s or develop in trunk? It doesn't alter any existing files so it shouldn't interfere with our existing build. > Meanwhile I read Scons Documentation. > > Am Samstag, den 02.12.2017, 10:05 +0200 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > Hi > > > > After days of failing to add

Re: A more sane way to build - SCons, deCygwination and other hopes

han wrote: > If it turns out to only make things even more complicated, adding yet > another build tool, how hard would it be to remove it from trunk? > > On 12/6/2017 6:10 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > ... > >> Should we make a separate branch for SCons or develop in trunk?

Re: [proposal] going Agile

On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:05 AM, Marcus wrote: > Am 09.02.2018 um 01:19 schrieb Patricia Shanahan: > >> On February 8, 2018, at 5:51 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: >> >> # Start spreading knowledge in our development team. >>> 1) I would like to propose a Product Backlog / OIL (OpenIssue) Li

Re: Openoffice and unsupported gstreamer 0.10 branch (for openoffice libavmediagst.so library)

Hi I've begun having a look. We currently test for gstreamer in configure.ac but don't use the result, re-running pkg-config in a main/avmedia's makefile. Changing the version number to 1.0 breaks the build due a missing header file. Removing that "#include" gets it a little further, but it brea

Re: Openoffice and unsupported gstreamer 0.10 branch (for openoffice libavmediagst.so library)

ented here: https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/documentation/application-development/appendix/porting-1-0.html https://cgit.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/plain/docs/random/porting-to-1.0.txt On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Hi > > I've begun ha

Re: Openoffice and unsupported gstreamer 0.10 branch (for openoffice libavmediagst.so library)

ins-ivorbis:0.10" and > "gst-plugins-pango:0.10". > > > Could you also share rebuilded library for testing? Is it compatible > with current AOO 4.1.5 build? > > Thank yo in advance. > > -- > Sergey > > > > On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 19:56:42 +0200 >

Re: Openoffice and unsupported gstreamer 0.10 branch (for openoffice libavmediagst.so library)

id on all events does get it to embed, badly, with lots of warnings, and the window gets distorted when scrolling and doesn't respond to mouse clicks 🙈. Damjan On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 4:53 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Thank you. The video plays, but in a separate window instead of being

Re: Openoffice and unsupported gstreamer 0.10 branch (for openoffice libavmediagst.so library)

SVN trunk in revision 1825700. Torokhov, Jose, Peter: thank you for all your support. Please test and report any problems. Damjan On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Unfortunately it looks like the problem is harder than just getting it to > build. Even after fixing som

Re: Openoffice and unsupported gstreamer 0.10 branch (for openoffice libavmediagst.so library)

ure" (it's disabled by default. Should it be?) On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 8:39 AM, Jose R R wrote: > On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:14 PM, Damjan Jovanovic > wrote: > > I finally cracked it. The gstreamer pipeline gets created early, during > > construction of the avmedia/so

Win64 port started, and how building 32 bit AOO on Win64 could break soon

Hi I've begun the long overdue task of porting AOO to 64 bit Windows. With my changes so far, oowintool can now detect (the 64 bit only) Java 1.9, dmake can now compile in Cygwin64, ./configure and ./bootstrap complete successfully, and (with uncommitted patches) both dmake and gbuild modules man

Re: Win64 port started, and how building 32 bit AOO on Win64 could break soon

relatively safe) module changes broke the Win32 build. On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 6:43 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > On 3/4/2018 7:41 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > ... > >> While the progress I've made [in 1 weekend ;-)] is impressive, I imagine a >> full port

Re: Win64 port started, and how building 32 bit AOO on Win64 could break soon

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 3:29 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > > On 3/4/2018 11:27 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > ... > >> But there is a simple way to both keep the 64->32 bit building working >> while making the 64 bit changes in trunk, and still get the benef

Re: svn commit: r1826059 - /openoffice/trunk/main/solenv/win64/win64.patch

Why is it in Bugzilla? Merge it! :) Mac users can either test regularly, or deal with the consequences later. On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 2:55 AM, Don Lewis wrote: > On 7 Mar, dam...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: damjan > > Date: Wed Mar 7 00:39:35 2018 > > New Revision: 1826059 > > > > URL: http:

Re: patch to move $CCNUMVER from dmake to configure

Hi Don Please commit this patch ASAP. I think you're waited enough for Mac testers, and it's now holding up other changes I want to make. I can even commit it for you. Thank you Damjan On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Don Lewis wrote: > On 16 Jan, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > > > > On 01/11/2018

Re: Win64 port started, and how building 32 bit AOO on Win64 could break soon

2018 at 10:19 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 3:29 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > >> >> >> On 3/4/2018 11:27 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >> ... >> >>> But there is a simple way to both keep the 64->32 bit buildin

Re: Win64 port started, and how building 32 bit AOO on Win64 could break soon

y local build. > > > > See a more detailed log from our buildbot: > > > > https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/ > win/main/cppuhelper/wntmsci12.pro/misc/logs/source.txt > > > > Regards, > > > > Matthias > > > >

Re: Win64 port started, and how building 32 bit AOO on Win64 could break soon

I've added back the deleted map file I forgot to revert, and have forced a rebuild on the Windows bot. On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 3:52 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Am 13.03.2018 um 04:19 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > Hi > > > > Thank you. > > > > Fi

First steps in building with MSVC 14 / Visual Studio 2015

Hi I am not just working on the Win64 port, but also had a brief look at building AOO with the newer MSVC 14 in Visual Studio 2015. I used Cygwin64 but did a 32 bit AOO build. (You can do that now; my 64 bit patches fixed the issues we had with Cygwin64 before.) First step was patching oowintool

Re: Win64 port started, and how building 32 bit AOO on Win64 could break soon

That's good :). I tried to look at 127731, but in the process discovered a far worse issue: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127732 Damjan On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:15 PM, Matthias Seidel < matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote: > Am 13.03.2018 um 17:54 schrieb Da

Re: gstreamer

Why? The licence for GStreamer is LGPL, which is Category X. Damjan On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 4:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I think there was general consensus to make gstreamer > a external download dependency. As of this date, this > has not yet been folded in. Who can take point on that? >

Re: gstreamer

ae4f8 > d185ff7a94e0fc7d47a3b1b7f6@%3Cdev.openoffice.apache.org%3E > > I don't recall you bringing all this up there. > > > On Mar 14, 2018, at 12:03 PM, Damjan Jovanovic > wrote: > > > > Why? The licence for GStreamer is LGPL, which is Category X. > >

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >