Re: Any news from x64 port?

On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 3:50 PM Bidouille wrote: > Seems to be paused since 2018: > https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Win64_port > > So I've been playing around lately, and thinking how to do the Win64 port, a newer MSVC compiler, and to finish the port to gbuild or a better build system, all at t

Re: The issue of bad allocation in Calc

On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 3:34 PM Aivaras Stepukonis wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone have the time and expertise to solve the issue of bad > allocation afflicting Calc as per Issue > 125006 - Calc > Consistently crashing, usually with "Fatal Error - Bad

Re: Monteray MacOS build and Python

On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 10:36 AM Bidouille wrote: > Hello, > > Since MacOS 12.3, Apple don't provide Python 2.7 > > https://developer.apple.com/documentation/macos-release-notes/macos-12_3-release-notes#Python > > So, you can not run any Python scripts anyway. > > Annoying... > > We have had Pytho

Let's replace expat with libxml2?

Hi We currently use 2 XML libraries in our C/C++ code, expat and libxml2. This is unnecessary, one of them can be removed, and I propose we remove expat. expat is a small library that only does SAX parsing, and lacks DOM, lacks XSLT, lacks schema validation or any more advanced features we use. B

Re: [Action required] Cygwin x86 end-of-life

On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 2:42 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > Am 26.11.22 um 12:26 schrieb Pedro Lino: > > Hi Matthias, all > > > >> On 11/25/2022 7:16 PM WET Matthias Seidel > wrote: > >> Damjan posted the needed patches to build AOO41X with Cygwin64, if > >> anyone wants to commit the

Re: AOO as built from source fails in libcurl

On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 5:13 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi, > > That looks a bit like this issue on macOS: > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128535 > > Can you try to disable the automatic update check? > > Regards, > >Matthias > > Am 26.11.22 um 16:08 schrieb Yury Tarasievich: >

Re: nss has included sqlite instance

On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 3:37 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: > Are we aware on this dependency? > > I am running into compiler issues using gcc 11.3 from ubuntu 22.04 LTS. > > I am aware. I discovered, and might even have proposed on this list, that we use that sqlite database ourselves, to import its CA

Re: nss has included sqlite instance

On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 7:51 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Am 21.12.22 um 18:22 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 3:37 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: > > > >> Are we aware on this dependency? > >> > >> I am running into compile

Re: building 4.2.X and trunk on ARM64 platforms

Yes, and bridges are specific to CPU, OS compiler version, and compiler settings. Eg. Even on Win32, the legacy mingw compiler uses sjlj exception handling, which is completely incompatible with MSVC's exception handling, so a separate bridge is needed for each. We would likely need a gcc_linux_arm

Re: Support for maven

On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 9:10 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > There are some java apps that no longer support ant and > instead rely on maven. Last I checked, I don't think we > support that, do we? > > > But why are we compiling Java projects? We compile C/C++ projects because (1) upstream often doesn'

Re: Profile Backup/Restore

Hi all On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 4:55 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > Am 19.12.22 um 13:39 schrieb Pedro Lino: > > Hi all > > > > Is there any extension to Backup/Restore the contents of the User > Profile? > > > > I don't mean copy files but actually exporting and importing the > conten

[Wiki] Access to update the main wiki page?

Hi I have access to edit our wiki, but while trying to update our main main wiki page at https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page I saw it's been locked against changes. Can I please get access? For starters, I'd like to add a link to https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Source_code_directories un

Re: Happy...

On Sun, Jan 1, 2023 at 8:40 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > ...new year! ;-) > > Matthias > > Happy New Year everyone! Damjan

Re: Fails to build on Pop!_OS 18.04

On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 1:47 PM Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi all > > I'm testing a UEFI compatible Linux OS named Pop!_OS > Compiling 41X fails on bean with messages > > WARNING(S): > Some modules contain old output trees! Please check: bean > > = > Building module bean > = > > E

Re: ByteString vs Strbuf vs OString

On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 9:51 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hi all, > > > I have an emotional issue and I need some help. > > I think the classes mentioned in subject are all crap. They are all ugly > and I do not want to use any of them. > > I would like to remove them. And replace them with > > > st

Re: T-DOSE 2023

On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 4:18 PM Dr. Michael Stehmann < anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de> wrote: > Hello, > > T-DOSE 2023 will be held on the 22nd and 23rd of April 2023, at a new > location the Weeffabriek in Geldrop (near Eindhoven). > > T-DOSE is a free and yearly event held in The Netherlands to

Buildbot problems

Hi I am trying to get all the buildbots working again, but there are many problems... 1. All the Windows buildbots are failing in "./configure" with: configure: error: cannot run /bin/sh ./config.sub This could be due to \r\n line endings or a BOM on main/config.sub, but I've checked and it uses

Re: Buildbot problems

On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 10:11 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Am 15.01.23 um 07:12 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > Hi > > > > I am trying to get all the buildbots working again, but there are many > > problems... > > > > 1. All the Windows buildbots are fa

Re: Buildbot problems

uld be updated to 3.4.3. But remember to > downgrade make then... > > Regards, > >Matthias > > Am 15.01.23 um 12:25 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > > Hi Damjan, Peter, > > > > Am 15.01.23 um 09:58 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > >> On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 10:11

Re: Please update boost (1.79.0 would be just great)

On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 8:25 PM Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Helo guys; > I don't currently have all the time I'd wish for AOO development so I > thought I'd suggest this task for some volunteer. > The Apache OpenOffice FreeBSD port has been broken for awhile and getting > boost updated would be of gre

Re: Please update boost (1.79.0 would be just great)

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 1:58 AM Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 8:25 PM Pedro Giffuni wrote: > >> Helo guys; >> I don't currently have all the time I'd wish for AOO development so I >> thought I'd suggest this task for some vol

Re: Please update boost (1.79.0 would be just great)

> +#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_DELETED_FUNCTIONS 1 > +#include > > On 20/01/2023 21:52, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > So I eventually succeeded in getting OpenOffice > > to compile against the "c++14" standard now, and > > to use a newer Boost. > > -

Re: Buildbot problems

On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 8:26 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi, > > Am 16.01.23 um 03:47 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > Hi > > > > That's progress, because if you compare it to the previous build's > > ./configure: > > https://ci2.apache.org/#/bu

Re: Fails to build on Pop!_OS 18.04

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 11:48 PM Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi Peter, all > > > On 01/23/2023 11:33 AM WET Peter Kovacs wrote: > > > yes, but it looks on disk like the following? > > > > ls /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64 > > ASSEMBLY_EXCEPTION bin docs include jre lib man src.zip > > THIRD_PA

Re: 41X fails to build in Ubuntu 18.04 (was Re: Fails to build on Pop!_OS 18.04)

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 7:21 PM Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi Damjan > > > On 01/24/2023 1:23 AM WET Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > In your --with-jdk-home directory, do you have these files: > > > > include/jawt.h > > include/linux/jawt_md.h > > No,

Re: Nightly Builds

On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 3:14 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > > Four weeks are a good period to have archived if a regression occurs. > > No. For old regressions, or to discover old fixes, we ideally want a build from every month in AOO's history.

Re: AOO 4.1.14

On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 4:09 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Carl, > > Am 07.02.23 um 14:52 schrieb Carl Marcum: > > Hi All, > > > > On 2/7/23 4:48 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I think it is time for the next release. > >> > >> I have created the Release Schedule [1] for AOO 4.

Re: Pull Request 164

Hi I've now merged it. Should we also cherry-pick it into AOO42X? I am currently testing it there. Regards Damjan On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 1:14 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > So at least 3 people are interested in this big enhancement... > > @Damjan: I would say, merge it! We need to move forward

Re: Pull Request 164

It's in AOO42X too now. Damjan On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 3:10 PM Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Hi > > I've now merged it. > > Should we also cherry-pick it into AOO42X? I am currently testing it there. > > Regards > Damjan > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at

Re: User Installation Process Feedback

On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 2:52 PM wrote: > Hello GB Mac, > > Le 2023-02-15 06:36, GB Mac a écrit : > > OpenOffice remains a perpetual > > developer project in Linux. > It's a problem to do with your Linux distribution (which you don't > specify). > See with them so that the DEB or RPM package is se

Re: Buildbot problems

On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 1:33 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > > > > > > >>> Now regarding Awk, instead of doing: > >>> rm /bin/awk > >>> mv /bin/gawk.exe /bin/awk.exe > >>> can't we prepend PATH with a directory containing an "awk" script that > >> just > >>> calls gawk.exe? > >> It would be great if

Re: Buildbot problems

ete! > > It seems like MozillaBuild was updated to 4.x, which we do not support yet. > > Regards, > >Matthias > > Am 02.03.23 um 05:46 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 1:33 PM Matthias Seidel > > wrote: > > > Now regarding Aw

Re: Buildbot config - svn or git?

On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 8:30 AM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi All, > > bumping this up again. > > Thanks to Peter our Linux buildbots are functional again. > > But the buildbot configuration is still on SVN. > > I would prefer it on Git. Opinions? > > Regards, > >Matthias > > Git, absolutely.

Re: Flat ODF

On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 5:05 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi All, > > What do you think about these filters: > > https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=44216 > > Would it be possible to add Flat ODF to AOO? > > While I can import and use them in my Windows build the import cras

4.2.0 release blockers

Hi So for 4.2.0, presumably we need to fix the bugs with 4.2.0_release_blocker flags: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?f1=flagtypes.name&list_id=251353&o1=substring&query_format=advanced&resolution=---&v1=4.2.0_release_blocker of which there is 6: For 127731, I found the problem yesterday (M

Re: 4.2.0 release blockers

On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 4:52 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > On Oct 1, 2023, at 7:44 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > > 127154 and 127966 need to be looked at by a Mac developer. > > > > Those look pretty old. I should create a quick macOS 4.2.0 dev build fo

Re: "Roadmap"

On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 1:24 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi All, > > I would like to collect ideas for some kind of roadmap for AOO: > > - Release AOO 4.1.15 before the end of 2023. Branch AOO41X is in good > condition, but personally I would like to have the "ugly UI" fixed on > some Linux dist

Re: "Roadmap"

On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 9:49 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Am 05.10.23 um 23:25 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > > Hi Marcus, > > > > Am 05.10.23 um 23:17 schrieb Marcus: > >> Am 05.10.23 um 21:25 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > >>> Am 05.10.23 um 21:06 schrieb Marcus: > Am 05.10.23 um 15:23 schrieb Matth

Re: "Roadmap"

On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 9:49 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Am 05.10.23 um 23:25 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > > Hi Marcus, > > > > Am 05.10.23 um 23:17 schrieb Marcus: > >> Am 05.10.23 um 21:25 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > >>> Am 05.10.23 um 21:06 schrieb Marcus: > Am 05.10.23 um 15:23 schrieb Matth

Binaries for old A00420/AOO450 Windows versions?

Hi Do we have very old versions of the Windows binaries for AOO420/AOO450 somewhere, for use in bisection testing? Like from 2014-2018? Thank you Damjan

Re: Ugly UI [Was: "Roadmap"]

On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 10:57 AM Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi Arrigo, all > > This does solve the UI problem. > > Does it mean we need to include this library in the installer? > > The licence is LGPL-2+, so we can't ship it, right? Regards Damjan

Re: (openoffice) branch trunk updated: The HTML tag ended with HTML 4, and newer versions of javadoc (Java 17's at least) support HTML 5 tags only. Use instead.

eems to break our buildbot (with Java 8) in module ODK: > > > > https://ci2.apache.org/#/builders/58/builds/689 > > > > Regards, > > > >Matthias > > > >> 872b251390 is described below > >> > >> commit 872b2513907e4389be70e2d9b56

Re: is it possible to build trunk with system OpenSSL?

On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 6:52 PM Yury Tarasievich wrote: > Hi, > > Yeah, the linux build. AFAIU the build process > is a bit wilful, maybe it's fluking again. > > I am pretty sure I've always used --with-system-openssl on FreeBSD successfully, but I am retrying from a clean build now. And it's --w

Re: is it possible to build trunk with system OpenSSL?

On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 6:53 AM Yury Tarasievich wrote: > Hi all, > > Regarding the matter in the Subject, I've found > I can just build with internal OpenSSL (which's > rather old, btw), then rename libcrypto.so and > libssl.so, and so actually use the system libraries. > > But as to why I needed

Re: is it possible to build trunk with system OpenSSL?

On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 7:40 AM Yury Tarasievich wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for answering. What fails in >IMPL_LINK( SvxSecurityTabPage, MacroSecPBHdl, > void*, EMPTYARG ) > is that check: >if ( xD.is() ) > And the xD object is non-null at that. > > Somehow I can't set a breakpoint to that >

Re: is it possible to build trunk with system OpenSSL?

On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 6:56 AM Yury Tarasievich wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you, Damjan, for the prompt looking into > the problem. > > It's a pleasure, let's try fix it so nobody else suffers. > Regarding the matters you address: > > If I understand correctly, the configure code > allows for a sepa

Re: is it possible to build trunk with system OpenSSL?

On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 8:25 AM Yury Tarasievich wrote: > ...in followup to my previous post: > > So sources for xmlsec1 library which is used in > the 'xmlsecurity' module are NOT downloaded when > this condition (in external_deps.lst) is false? > > if (ENABLE_NSS_MODULE!=NO && SYSTEM_NSS!=YES)

Can't create pages in the Wiki

Hi I don't seem to have permission to create new pages in the Wiki ( wiki.openoffice.org). Can someone please give me access? Thank you Damjan (also my Wiki username)

ODF 1.3 development

Hi I've started looking at how to add ODF 1.3 support to OpenOffice. If you scroll to the end of the monstrously long part 3 of the ODF 1.3 specification at https://docs.oasis-open.org/office/OpenDocument/v1.3/os/part3-schema/OpenDocument-v1.3-os-part3-schema.html where you'll see "Appendix G: Ch

Re: Can't create pages in the Wiki

On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 12:27 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 09/01/24 Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > I don't seem to have permission to create new pages in the Wiki ( > > wiki.openoffice.org). > > Can someone please give me access? > > I've given additional per

Re: ODF 1.3 development

On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 7:23 PM Marcus wrote: > Am 12.01.24 um 19:19 schrieb Marcus: > > Am 10.01.24 um 06:36 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > >> [...] > >> > >> Can someone please create such a Wiki page, or give me access to do so? > >> > >> [.

odf-1.3 branch pushed, progress update

Hi I've now pushed my "odf-1.3" branch upstream, which has some initial ODF 1.3 compatibility patches, a patch adding a new constraint for the RECEIVED function, and another to only make the upgrade dialog appear when version > 1.3. There are 3 useful parts to the ODF 1.3 specification, part 2 de

Re: odf-1.3 branch pushed, progress update

On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 7:10 PM Marcus wrote: > Am 16.01.24 um 17:50 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > I've now pushed my "odf-1.3" branch upstream, which has some initial ODF > > 1.3 compatibility patches, a patch adding a new constraint for the > RECEIVED > >

ODF 1.3 ForceArray attribute?

Hi Can someone please explain to me what the "ForceArray" attribute is supposed to do? To quote from https://docs.oasis-open.org/office/OpenDocument/v1.3/os/part4-formula/OpenDocument-v1.3-os-part4-formula.html#__RefHeading__1017986_715980110 ---snip--- 6.3.4 Force to array context (ForceArray)

Re: ODF 1.3 ForceArray attribute?

On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 5:02 PM Czesław Wolański wrote: > Hi Damjan, > > On 2024/01/23 16:42:52 Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > Hi > > > > Can someone please explain to me what the "ForceArray" attribute is > > supposed to do? > > > > Just my tw

Re: Aufnahme Referenzkundenliste

Do they want this page updated: http://www.openoffice.org/bizdev/consultants.html How do we do that? And let's keep it please. Regards Damjan On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 4:26 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Has anyone worked on this? > > Or should we remove this list at all? > > Regards, > >Matth

Re: WebDAV module ported from serf to curl; curl using openssl and zlib (was: Re: Openssl, serf and curl)

On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 7:20 AM Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > > Apparently, we are not. If we force CURLOPT_CAINFO and CURLOPT_CAPATH > to be NULL, we get a bit further but eventually Curl aborts because > validateServerX509Certificate fails. > > Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but I think I now un

main/cosv and main/udm are now merged into main/autodoc

Hi 2 small modules, main/cosv and main/udm, were found unused by the rest of the build and have now been merged into main/autodoc, in trunk and AOO42X. main/autodoc depends on main/cosv and main/udm. main/udm depends on main/cosv. No other module depends on main/cosv or main/udm. The only deliver

Re: Problem With Open Office and Windows 11 /11 Pro.

On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 3:12 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Francis, All, > > Am 12.02.24 um 17:00 schrieb F Campos Costero: > > Hi Don, > > There are several posts on the user forum about similar problems. For > > example > https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?p=536089#p536089 > >

Re: [Issue 101010] Direct svg or eps export from calc

Thank you everyone. There are still a few further clipboard improvements I have planned, which I'll elaborate on separately, but briefly: - it might not work on macOS, and probably needs another patch. - SVG can be copied out of OpenOffice, but cannot be pasted into OpenOffice yet. - Neither can w

MacOS testing for bug 112829 (SVG clipboard format)

Hi For bug 112829, I got graphics and charts to copy out of AOO in SVG format on FreeBSD and Windows (and probably Linux), but I wasn't able to test macOS. A quick look at the code shows we might need another patch to get it working there, possibly the one below. Can someone please test it and re

MIME types for WMF/EMF

Hi While developing the patch for bug 112829, I saw that our clipboard formats for WMF and EMF are "application/x-openoffice-wmf;windows_formatname=\"Image WMF\"" and "application/x-openoffice-emf;windows_formatname=\"Image EMF\"". This leads to other applications being able to paste WMF and EMF f

Re: MacOS testing for bug 112829 (SVG clipboard format)

Either trunk or AOO42X. On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 7:11 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > Which branch? > > > On Feb 22, 2024, at 10:54 AM, Damjan Jovanovic > wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > For bug 112829, I got graphics and charts to copy out of AOO in SVG > forma

Re: [Issue 101010] Direct svg or eps export from calc

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 3:50 PM Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > - SVG can be copied out of OpenOffice, but cannot be pasted into > OpenOffice yet. > This is now fixed by dbea4404ca2c86a3a74294e262e6584c3e450818 in trunk and 8809675e418555082e24d8d46f876db1e912250e in AOO42X, you c

Re: MacOS testing for bug 112829 (SVG clipboard format)

> I mean, is there a branch with this already folded in? > > > On Feb 22, 2024, at 2:27 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > > Either trunk or AOO42X. > > > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 7:11 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > >> Which branch? > >>

Re: Problem in installing "libgnomevfs2-dev" for building OpenOffice on Debian 12.5.

GnomeVFS was discontinued a long time ago, and replaced by GIO (and GVFS) instead. Luckily we support both. Pass --enable-gio and --disable-gnome-vfs to ./configure. And you can build OpenOffice without either of them, but it would probably limit access to files on filesystems that those provide (

MS Office 2010+ "Agile" encrypted OOXML documents are working now!

Hi Bug 118236 with 7 votes, the inability to open password-protected (encrypted) OOXML files from MS Office 2010+, is now fixed in trunk :-) ---snip--- commit 506fa58b1970084a0caacb50b3a805e469be4756 (HEAD -> trunk, origin/trunk, origin/HEAD) Author: Damjan Jovanovic Date: Sat Mar 2 18:47

Re: MS Office 2010+ "Agile" encrypted OOXML documents are working now!

the errors in that module you can resume the build > by running: > > build --from oox > > Am 16.03.24 um 04:49 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > Hi > > > > Bug 118236 with 7 votes, the inability to open password-protected > > (encrypted) OOXML files from M

Re: MS Office 2010+ "Agile" encrypted OOXML documents are working now!

data' : is not a member of 'std::vector<_Ty>' > with > [ > _Ty=sal_uInt8 > ] > c:/Source/openoffice/main/oox/source/core/encryption.cxx(932) : error > C2039: 'data' : is not a member of 'std::vector&

Re: MS Office 2010+ "Agile" encrypted OOXML documents are working now!

ord dialog > > > > But when I enter the correct password AOO crashes. > > > > Regards, > > > >Matthias > > > > P.S.: This was a partial build, I will try a complete build now. > > > > Am 17.03.24 um 12:23 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: >

Re: MS Office 2010+ "Agile" encrypted OOXML documents are working now!

x, > > docx) I now get the password dialog > > > > But when I enter the correct password AOO crashes. > > > > Regards, > > > >Matthias > > > > P.S.: This was a partial build, I will try a complete build now. > > > > Am 17.03.24 um 12:23

OpenSSL upgrade?

a newer OpenSSL for Trunk and maybe 4.2 would be a very good thing, > > Best, > Dave > > > On Mar 17, 2024, at 4:23 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > > Also > > that ancient OpenSSL version we use internally, 1.0.x, uses > > EVP_MD_CTX_create()/destroy() inst

Re: MS Office 2010+ "Agile" encrypted OOXML documents are working now!

.. > > Regards, > > Matthias > > Am 17.03.24 um 16:56 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > > I am already doing a full build,but hopefully I could pull your last > > commit soon enough. > > > > Regards, > > > >Matthias > > > > Am 17.03.24 um 15:20 s

OpenSSL upgraded to 3.0.13

Hi I've now pushed commit 4c5b548fb6ece87dd30bbf720aca0d994a749167 into trunk, upgrading our OpenSSL version from 1.0.2u to 3.0.13. Some issues to consider: - PLATFORMS - It works on FreeBSD 14, both with system OpenSSL linked dynamically and internal Open

Re: MS Office 2010+ "Agile" encrypted OOXML documents are working now!

On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 5:46 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Am 17.03.24 um 18:01 schrieb Dave Fisher: > > Hi Damjan, > > > > I know it “opens a big can of worms” and is another issue, but upgrading > to a newer OpenSSL for Trunk and maybe 4.2 would be a very good thing, > > We need to u

Re: OpenSSL upgraded to 3.0.13

On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 1:27 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Damjan, All, > > Am 29.03.24 um 15:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > > Hi Damjan, > > > > Am 29.03.24 um 10:33 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > >> Hi > >> > >> I've now pushed comm

Re: OpenSSL upgraded to 3.0.13

To get further details: Open the attached "Logging macros" file (we allow attachments on this list, right?). Allow macros when prompted. Tools -> Macros -> Run macro, under "Logging macros.ods" expand "Standard", select "logging", on the right side select "LogWebDavToConsole", and click "Run". Exi

Re: OpenSSL upgraded to 3.0.13

On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 9:52 PM Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi Damjan > > Thank you for the reply, the macro and detailed instructions! > > > > On 04/04/2024 5:37 PM WEST Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > > To get further details: > > > > Open the attached "

Re: OpenSSL upgraded to 3.0.13

On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 2:30 PM Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi Damjan > > > After trying a WebDav connection, find the process ID (PID) of > OpenOffice, > > copy /proc/PID/maps somewhere (eg. for PID 1234, run "cp /proc/1234/maps > > ~/openoffice-maps.txt") and attach that copy, so we can see what > libra

Re: OpenSSL upgraded to 3.0.13

On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 9:30 PM Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi Damjan > > > On 04/06/2024 4:08 PM WEST Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > openoffice-maps.txt was for the shell script that launches AOO, and > > openoffice-maps2.txt was for AOO itself. > > I'm glad I sent

Re: OpenSSL upgraded to 3.0.13

On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 3:52 AM Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 9:30 PM Pedro Lino > wrote: > >> Hi Damjan >> >> > On 04/06/2024 4:08 PM WEST Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >> >> > openoffice-maps.txt was for the shell script t

Dynamic OpenSSL causes Curl regression on *nix

Hi With Pedro Lino's help, I've discovered a serious regression, where Curl (and libraries that use Curl) can fail to load, because they've been dynamically linked to OpenSSL but cannot find the copy of OpenSSL shipped with OpenOffice. == TIMELINE == -

Re: Dynamic OpenSSL causes Curl regression on *nix

On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 2:26 PM Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > Hello Damjan, All, > > On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 01:53:08PM +0000, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > Hi > > > > With Pedro Lino's help, I've discovered a serious regression, where Curl > > (and libr

Re: Dynamic OpenSSL causes Curl regression on *nix

On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 5:22 PM Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 2:26 PM Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > > Honestly, I don't know in detail what RPATH is and how to change it, >> and I would like to adopt the simplest approach to the problem. >> &

Re: Dynamic OpenSSL causes Curl regression on *nix

On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 10:14 PM Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > Hello Damjan, All, > > replying to this other message. > > On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 02:42:01PM +, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > [...] > > Here's how you set RPATH in Curl: > > > > ---snip--- &

Re: Dynamic OpenSSL causes Curl regression on *nix

On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 9:21 PM Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > > > > I think this thread excerpt explains it: > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/3rvvgxnws9867krk75rw6bvhmds1t2co > > > > > > > > Is that horrible bug fixed now, or does Curl/OpenSSL still crash AOO in > > certain setups? > > Now when I

Re: Dynamic OpenSSL causes Curl regression on *nix

making > './wntmsci12.pro/misc/build/so_built_so_curl' > > 1 module(s): > curl > need(s) to be rebuilt > > Regards, > > Matthias > > Hi Matthias Please try again now, this might fix it: commit 9b51720274ee0b7c1a

Re: Dynamic OpenSSL causes Curl regression on *nix

On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 9:21 PM Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > > > > > I think this thread excerpt explains it: > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/3rvvgxnws9867krk75rw6bvhmds1t2co > > > > > > > > Is that horrible bug fixed now, or does Curl/OpenSSL still crash AOO in > > certain setups? > > Now when

Re: Dynamic OpenSSL causes Curl regression on *nix

On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 11:27 AM Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi Damjan > > > On 04/22/2024 6:21 PM WEST Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > Now what would you guys prefer: > > - Should I do more testing, on Windows and Linux, and push my changes in > a > > few days? >

Re: Dynamic OpenSSL causes Curl regression on *nix

On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 9:06 PM Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi Arrigo, Damjan, all > > > On 04/26/2024 8:16 PM WEST Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > > > The build can be downloaded from here: > > > https://home.apache.org/~ardovm/openoffice/linux/openoffice4-2024-04-26-x86_64-installed.tar.bz2 > > Just tested

Re: (openoffice) 01/12: Port our WebDAV content provider from serf/apr/apr-util, to curl.

On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 4:46 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > Hi Arrigo, > > With this change do we eliminate all dependencies on Apache APR? > > Best, > Dave > > Yes. The ucb WebDAV module was their only user, so using Curl as the HTTP(S) library, allowed apr, apr-util and serf to be removed as dependenc

Re: Dynamic OpenSSL causes Curl regression on *nix

On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 10:55 AM Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi Arrigo, all > > > On 04/27/2024 5:36 PM WEST Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > > > The build can be downloaded from here: > > > https://home.apache.org/~ardovm/openoffice/linux/openoffice4-2024-04-27-x86_64-installed.tar.bz2 > > Tested in Ubuntu 20

Re: Documenting our source code structure

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 2:41 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi All, > > Some time ago I added some rudimentary Readme to some directories in our > code, e.g.: > > https://github.com/apache/openoffice/edit/trunk/main/sw/README.md > > Please feel encouraged to add more information to describe what a >

Re: Is their hope for aarch64 support?

On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 8:39 PM SET wrote: > Hello, > > I just realised that AOO is not available on aarch64 while it is supported > on > so many platforms. armv7 will probably be legacy at some point, like 1686. > > This post from 2020 advises to switch to LibreOffice: > > https://forum.openoffi

What happened to our document repository for type detection tests?

Hi While doing some analysis and refactoring of our unit tests, I found a really interesting - and important - test. It's in main/filter/qa/complex/filter/detection/typeDetection, and it iterates through a repository of documents, trying to get OpenOffice to detect the type of each document, and

Unit test improvements and other changes

Hi Over the last month or so, over 88 commits, I've made many improvements to our unit tests, and many related changes, and have now pushed these changes to trunk. They have included the following: - The "complex" tests (usually in /qa/complex) now all only use JUnit to run. JUnit is far more wid

Re: ODF 1.3 development

On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 6:34 AM Bidouille wrote: > Hello, > Microsoft seems to be engage to support ODF 1.4 > https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?t=111685 > Shouldn't we take the plunge and jump directly in 1.4? > > It doesn't really work like that. The changes are additive. The 1

AOO Base CSV driver is now free of its 64 KiB row/field limit ;)

Hi A long and painful bug with CSV files has been that OpenOffice has a row (line) limit of 64 KiB (in characters), as well as a field limit of 64 KiB. While individual lines of >= 64 KiB are rare, quoted CSV fields can span multiple lines. Now, at least in Base, this limitation is finally gone!!

Re: Error while setting up cygwin

Hi Harsh Welcome to OpenOffice. There has to be a space between "cd" and "/bin", ie. "cd /bin" not "cd/bin". Please run "which awk" and then run "stat " followed by the file the previous command reported, and reply with the output. Regards Damjan On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 3:42 AM Harsh Giri <20

Re: Not yet translated functions UNICODE and UNICHAR

On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 3:39 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Aivaras, > > Am 28.07.24 um 17:32 schrieb Aivaras Stepukonis: > > 2024-07-28 11:17, Matthias Seidel rašė: > >> The last step would be to export the new translations to SDF files > >> and to merge them with our code. > > > > While I’m not

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >