Re: Build failed in Jenkins: OpenWebBeans » OpenWebBeans-trunk #38

I missed that there was a second build that needed to have its maven version changed to 3.6.3. I've gone ahead and made that change here as well. Just as before I don't think this is the right long term fix, but last I looked I couldn't find where that repository was specified to update it to

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: OpenWebBeans » OpenWebBeans-trunk-deploy #35

? On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 3:12 PM Joseph Bergmark wrote: > To test this theory I've reconfigured the build to use maven 3.6.3 rather > than maven_latest (probably 3.8.1?). This isn't the right long term fix, > but wanted to quickly check if that was in fact that cause of the error. > &

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: OpenWebBeans » OpenWebBeans-trunk-deploy #35

To test this theory I've reconfigured the build to use maven 3.6.3 rather than maven_latest (probably 3.8.1?). This isn't the right long term fix, but wanted to quickly check if that was in fact that cause of the error. On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 2:30 PM Joseph Bergmark wrote: > I think the

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: OpenWebBeans » OpenWebBeans-trunk-deploy #35

I think the key part of the error is: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project openwebbeans-tck: Could not resolve dependencies for project org.apache.openwebbeans:openwebbeans-tck:jar:2.0.24-SNAPSHOT: Failed to collect dependencies at org.jboss.cdi.tck:cdi-tck-impl:jar:2.0.3.Final ->

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.7

+1 On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 4:56 AM Mark Struberg wrote: > Good morning ladies and gents! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.7 > > The following tickets got resolved: > > Bug > > [OWB-1247] - Update to XBean Asm 6 Shaded 4.9 > [OWB-1248] - defineClass used

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.5

+1 On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 4:52 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > good evening! > > I'd like to call a VOTE to release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.5. > > The following tickets got resolved > > Bug > • [OWB-1233] - WrappedValueExpression.equals(Object arg0) always > false

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.5

+1 On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 8:10 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi folks! > > I did run all required tasks for shipping an OWB-1.7.5 release. > This version targets CDI-1.2 / EE7 and would fit for the TomEE-7.x line. > > The following tickets got resolved > > Bug > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.2

+1 On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > +1 and thanks a lot for it! > > Side question: why CDI-SE? the controller is for EE as well I think > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog >

Fwd: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.0

Sorry for sending to the wrong list! -- Forwarded message -- From: Joseph Bergmark <bergm...@apache.org> Date: Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:14 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.0 To: u...@openwebbeans.apache.org +1 On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Mark St

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.4

+1 built, mvn apache-rat:check, and ran a couple sample apps On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > Dear lords and ladies! > > It's my pleasure to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.4. > This is a maintenance release of our CDI-1.2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.3

+1 On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi folks! > > I've run the tasks to ship OWB 1.7.3. > > The following bugs got fixed > > Bug > > • [OWB-1172] - getResources doesn't work in OWB Arquillian > container for WebArchives > •

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0 - take 2

+1 On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > New take for OWB-1.7.0 > > Repo is > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/ > > Source release is > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0

+1 built, mvn apache-rat:check, and ran a couple of the sample applications. Looked good to me On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > Good morning! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0. > > > The staging repo is: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] moving OpenWebBeans to GIT?

+0 I really like DVCSs. working in feature branches, and the git workflow in general, but haven't been active at all in CDI-2.0 work so it makes more sense to stick with the opinion of those that are. On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Thomas Andraschko < andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > +0 -

Re: [VOTE] for Apache OpenWebBeans 1.6.1

+1 On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 3:10 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: +1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau |

Re: do we like to drop servlet-2.5 support?

Perhaps I'm being dense, but tomcat 6 is at spec level servlet 2.5 and tomcat 7 is at spec level servlet 3.0 right? Requiring Servlet 3.0 lets us leverage ServletContainerInitializers. On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: We can/should drop t6 but

Re: adding a web-fragment.xml to openwebbeans-web?

It should be well supported on any servlet 3.0 compliant container as its part of the specification. I suppose it could be inconvenient for application servers that already have OWB integration, but in that case I wouldn't expect the user to be including OWB in their application at all. As long

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.8

Forgot to add my +1 I'll open up a JIRA issue to take care of the README files and to ignore the generated DEPENDENCIES file. On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: I’d like to call a VOTE for releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.8 This is a maintenance release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.8

Never mind, I'm seeing similar problems with the last release (1.5.0) when I re-run it. Not sure what I might have done differently before. On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Joseph Bergmark bergm...@apache.org wrote: I'm seeing some errors with mvn rat:check: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.8

I'm seeing some errors with mvn rat:check: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.codehaus.mojo:rat-maven-plugin:1.0-alpha-3:ch eck (default-cli) on project openwebbeans: Too many unapproved licenses: 21 - [ Help 1] From my quick glance at rat.txt, they appear to mostly be the readme/* files which

Re: [DRAFT] OpenWebBeans board report 2015-03

If you haven't already sent it, I would make two trivial changes: 1) Fix the accidental typo of teh into the in the development section 2) In the community section, I might have chosen to used received instead of got, as in we received quite a few bug reports and patches. Very small things, and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.6

+1 On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.6 . This is a maintenance release of the owb_1.2.x branch and targets the CDI-1.0 specification. The ReleaseNotes are available online:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 1.2.5

that 1.2.4 worked and we only fixed a few bugs I'd let it run. LieGrue, strub On Saturday, 24 May 2014, 22:23, Joseph Bergmark bergm...@gmail.com wrote: No problem, I've opened a JIRA issue and attached a patch

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 1.2.5

I set up my build environment on a new machine, so its possible I'm fighting a configuration problem, but after a successful build from the 1.2.5 source zip, I'm having trouble with the guess sample app which is my normal go-to for quick testing. It looks like an EL or bean discovery problem, as

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 1.2.5

GMT+02:00 Joseph Bergmark bergm...@apache.org: I set up my build environment on a new machine, so its possible I'm fighting a configuration problem, but after a successful build from the 1.2.5 source zip, I'm having trouble with the guess sample app which is my normal go-to for quick testing

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 1.2.5

it. txs and LieGrue, strub On Saturday, 24 May 2014, 21:22, Joseph Bergmark bergm...@gmail.com wrote: I walked though the code in debug, and from what I can tell it appears to be an issue with the way the URLs are being generated (at least on my machine). My breakpoints

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.3

+1 On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.2 . This is a maintenance release of the owb_1.2.x branch and targets the CDI-1.0 specification. The ReleaseNotes are available online:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.2

+1 On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:09 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.2 . This is a maintenance release of the owb_1.2.x branch and targets the CDI-1.0 specification. The ReleaseNotes are available in the README and

Re: svn commit: r1552050 - in /openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-impl/src: main/java/org/apache/webbeans/component/creation/BeanAttributesBuilder.java test/java/org/apache/webbeans/newtests/specalization/mu

@Specializes BeanC extends BeanC It tried to extract the name for BeanC from BeanB but actually it must look for @Named on BeanA. 2013/12/18 Joseph Bergmark bergm...@gmail.com I'll be the first to admit I'm not very familiar with this code area, but is it possible that this change could

Re: OWB and generics

For some reason I believe the spec specifically says that Object should not be in the list of types, which I believe is why your plain old java example isn't valid. Joe On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Arne Limburg arne.limb...@openknowledge.dewrote: Hi Romain, In plain old java the

Re: OWB and generics

rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote: Didnt get your answer, there is no link with Object. A produced generic type modelizes all possible subtypes IMO (otherwise it should be forbidden cause it doesnt match original java meaning then) + all beans match Object in the spec Le 6 juil. 2013 15:17, Joseph

Re: [VOTE] take 3: Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0

+1 On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: I'd like to call a 3rd take to VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0 . This is the first release of the OpenWebBeans-1.2.x branch. This release changed many internal mechanics but still targets the CDI-1.0

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans build-tools 1.3

+1 On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 5:05 AM, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: +1 regards, gerhard 2013/5/14 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Hi! This is now a split VOTE for owb-build-tools-1.3 The stating repo is up here:

Re: svn commit: r1481253 - in /openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-impl/src: main/java/org/apache/webbeans/portable/AnnotatedTypeImpl.java test/java/org/apache/webbeans/portable/AnnotatedTypeImplTest.java

On a side note, if you are creating fake beans by using BeanManager.createInjectionTarget, at one point it had a side affect of registering ObserMethodImpls with the NotificantManager. Joe On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 5:05 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote: To explain a bit for

Re: classloader resolution

I like the idea of a flexible ClassLoaderResolverService, as long as can obtain the information about the bean class (if any) and interfaces. I'm not sure if just knowing the WebBeansContext is enough. For the old javassist proxies, one trick was using the bean class as long as that classloader

Re: classloader resolution

://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/* http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2013/4/4 Joseph Bergmark bergm...@gmail.com I like the idea of a flexible ClassLoaderResolverService, as long as can obtain the information

Re: interface, generics and interceptors

This looks like it might be the same as: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-706 If so, the quick fix for Javassist based proxies is to add an exclusion for bridge methods in our methodFilter. I haven't looked at this for our alternative proxy code. On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Romain

Re: The pittfalls of ClassLoaders for proxies

Sorry for the late response, but I don't think you have to worry about the hierarchical class loader scenario you described below. At least in the server I'm aware of, the modules classloaders all delegate up to the shared classloader. If they didn't then each module classloader would be loading

Re: [VOTE] release OpenWebBeans-1.1.6

+1 On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com wrote: +1 Thanks again Mark. JLouis 2012/12/6 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com otherwise it seems fine for me and all TCK passed (even in tomee/openejb) +1 Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau

Re: CDI-1.1 module handling

It doesn't sound incredibly dissimilar from the behavior that can be enabled by turning on the by the use bda beans.xml scanner flag. I think currently that flag only controls interceptors, decorators alternatives based on what bean is being injected, but it could feasibly also be aware of

Re: Method in OpenWebBeansEjbPlugin

I believe this method is used to take the actual method annotated and find which method that corresponds to in an EJB interface. The one place I see it used in the code is DefinitionUtil when its trying to determine the producer/disposer methods. I believe the concern is the proxy that is built

Re: [VOTE] [take-2] release Apache OpenWebBeans 1.1.6

+1 On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi! I'd again like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.1.6 . I fixed the issues which stopped our first attempt This is a bugfix release of OpenWebBeans-1.1.x, thus no branch has been created. It

Re: Eclipse/Checkstyle errors

Which test classes are you getting check style errors in? When I build on the command line I don't see any check style errors: [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.7:check (verify-style) @ openwebbeans-web --- [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.7:check (verify-style) @

Re: Eclipse/Checkstyle errors

the won't be checked by maven. For example - AbstractUnitTest#addExtension 2012/9/15 Joseph Bergmark bergm...@apache.org Which test classes are you getting check style errors in? When I build on the command line I don't see any check style errors: [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.7

Re: Fw: [DISCUSS] release OWB-1.1.6 end of this week?

I started to review the patch, and the changes I saw looked good, but there is so much whitespace reformatting in that patch that its hard to focus on just the implementation changes. Sincerely, Joe On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Thomas Andraschko zoi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Mark, it's

Re: [ANN] Welcome Thomas Andraschko as OpenWebBeans committer!

Welcome! On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Welcome Thomas! *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau* *Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com* 2012/9/12 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Hi community! I'm happy to announce that Thomas

Re: Fw: [DISCUSS] release OWB-1.1.6 end of this week?

deactivate remove trailing spaces in my IDE? 2012/9/12 Joseph Bergmark bergm...@apache.org I started to review the patch, and the changes I saw looked good, but there is so much whitespace reformatting in that patch that its hard to focus on just the implementation changes. Sincerely, Joe On Wed

Re: svn commit: r1363887 - /openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/logger/WebBeansLoggerFacade.java

). I didnt like to copy paste the code but it is a sure way to avoid linkageerror. About java 2 sec you are right it is ignored here. - Romain Le 10 sept. 2012 02:34, Joseph Bergmark bergm...@apache.org a écrit : I know was well over a month ago, but do you remember why

Re: svn commit: r1363887 - /openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/logger/WebBeansLoggerFacade.java

I know was well over a month ago, but do you remember why: WebBeansUtil.getCurrentClassLoader().loadClass(factoryClassname) is problematic, but a direct call to: ClassLoader classloader = Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader(); is not? They appear basically the same. Unless I'm

Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans 1.1.5

+1 On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi! I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.1.5 . This is a bugfix release of OpenWebBeans-1.1.x, thus no branch has been created. It mainly contains compatibility/portability/performance

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: OpenWebBeans_1.0.x #448

I did a little bit of poking around, and it appears this repository has been taken down. I think we need to update to point to the new repositories here: https://community.jboss.org/wiki/MavenRepository If anyone has time to dig in, please feel free. Otherwise I'll spend some more time trying

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: OpenWebBeans_1.0.x #448

! LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Joseph Bergmark bergm...@apache.org To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Cc: Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 3:56 PM Subject: Re: Build failed in Jenkins: OpenWebBeans_1.0.x #448 I did a little bit of poking around, and it appears

Re: [DISCUSS] implement a hierarchic BeanManager?

I agree, at the very minimum some way to associate bean managers as having visibility into each other would allow us to build more complex relationships. In your example below, all 3 wars would have visibility into shared jars in ear/lib, but have their own unique web-inf/lib jars. This mostly

Re: [DISCUSS] release owb-1.1.3?

+1 On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: +1 regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF/JEE powerhouse - JEE Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2011/11/29 Mark Struberg

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.1.2

+1 Sincerely, Joe On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi! I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.1.2 . This is a bugfix release of OpenWebBeans-1.1.x, thus no branch has been created. The ReleaseNotes are available online:

Re: [jira] [Created] (OWB-603) Incorporate enhanced BeanArchive handling of the preliminary CDI-1.1 specification

Should we separate owb 1.1 (which is an cdi 1.0 implementation) from early cdi 1.1 work somehow? A new branch perhaps? Joe On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Mark Struberg (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote: Incorporate enhanced BeanArchive handling of the preliminary CDI-1.1 specification

Re: Snapshots

deployed, but I'm OK with that happening occasionally. thanks david jencks On Jun 22, 2011, at 4:26 PM, Joseph Bergmark wrote: I set up the Hudson builds for both OpenWebBeans-trunk and OpenWebBeans_1.0.x. I suspect I could configure it to also configure it to publish them. I see

Re: Snapshots

I set up the Hudson builds for both OpenWebBeans-trunk and OpenWebBeans_1.0.x. I suspect I could configure it to also configure it to publish them. I see there is a Deploy artifacts to Maven repository option that takes a repository URL. Sincerely, Joe On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 6:02 PM, David

Re: [vote] project logo

+1 for #1 (also +1 for #3 from the dark background choices) Sincerely, Joe On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.orgwrote: hi @ all, please have a look at [1] and vote for your preferred logo. regards, gerhard [1]

Re: owb logo

Agreed, they are excellent! Joe On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: wow, they all look great! LieGrue, strub --- On Fri, 4/29/11, Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org wrote: From: Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org Subject: Re: owb logo To:

Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans 1.1.0

+1 On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi! I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.1.0 . Maven staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-040/ SVN source tag (1085208):

Re: NPE when calling BeanManagerImpl.isNormalScope(component.getScope())

I might be missing the point, but why are we calling OWB at all if this is a non-cdi ejb module (which I assume means no beans.xml)? Sincerely, Joe On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote: Could anyone shed some light on following issue ? I got a NPE when

Re: new site snapshot deployed

Thanks for doing this! It appears the download link doesn't work. I've had trouble with this myself the couple times I've tried to use the site generating plugin before. I could sometimes get it to work for either relative or absolute URLs, but never both. At a minimum I think we need to

Re: Build failed in Hudson: OpenWebBeans_1.0.x #75

Thanks Mark! Sincerely, Joe On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:43 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: I just moved on and upgraded the maven-checkstyle-plugin in the owb-1.0.x branch also. Hudson should now be happy again. LieGrue, strub --- On Fri, 1/28/11, Mark Struberg

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans checktyle-rules-1.1

+1 Sincerely, Joe On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: I missed the obvious vote footer, of course: Vote is open for 72h [+1] ship it [0] don't care [-1] re-roll (and reason why) LieGrue, strub --- On Mon, 1/17/11, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de

Re: Build failed in Hudson: OpenWebBeans-trunk #299

This still looks like we have some old artifacts hanging around from a few weeks ago. I've modified the build to not use svn update. If that doesn't resolve the problem, I'll set the maven goals to do a clean and then package. Sorry for the piecemeal approach, but I'm still not quite sure what

Re: Build failed in Hudson: OpenWebBeans-trunk #298

Mark hit the nail on the head. A hung build had prevented anything from running since Nov 16th. I opened a JIRA ticket for this a day or two ago, and they quickly resolved it. This is an odd error message though. Looks related to the fix I committed a week or two back, but I'm not seeing the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome David Jencks as an OpenWebBeans committer

Welcome! Sincerely, Joe On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:02 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi folks! The Apache OpenWebBeans PMC is pleased to announce that David Jencks has accepted our invitation to join OpenWebBeans as a committer. Congratulations and welcome David! txs and

Hudson build e-mails

I added a new build task to hudson for the owb_1.0.x branch, and updated the previous one to e-mail the development list on broken builds. According to the hudson wiki (http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson) in order for that e-mail to reach the dev list we need to send an e-mail from a moderator

Re: svn commit: r1028219 - in /openwebbeans/branches/owb_1.0.x/webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans: component/ResourceBean.java proxy/JavassistProxyFactory.java

This change to ResourceBean doesn't compile. It appears to be a partial backport. I attempted to quickly resolve it by bringing in the ResourceProxyHandler from trunk but hit another set of failures. In the meantime I have reverted it. Sincerely, Joe On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:44 AM,

Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.0.0 2nd try

+1 Sincerely, Joe On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi! I've re-rolled the release with the fixed readme and now like to call a 2nd VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.0.0 . Maven staging repo:

Re: ambiguous dependencies when using multiple qualifiers

I think you hit the nail on the head with your last paragraph. Basically it only matters that the bean (or producer in this case) matches all of the qualifiers on the injection point. From the perspective of the specification it doesn't matter if the bean has extra qualifiers beyond those on the

Re: [DISCUSS] remove logging for Calling method on proxy is restricted except Object.toString()

I don't interpret that sentence in quite the same way. When it says portable applications should not invoke any method declared by java.lang.Object, except for toString(), on a client proxy, I read that to say that this is behavior that the spec decided it couldn't define, so they are basically

Re: webbeans-tck in trunk

574 seems like the correct number for standalone, but your results do not appear to match mine. I get back: Failed tests: testBindingTypesAppliedToDisposalMethodParameters(org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.implementation.disposal.method.definition.DisposalMethodDefinitionTest)

Re: webbeans-tck in trunk

-harness.properties file, otherwise, I'd get a build failure. There is a slight chance that things might have regressed in between the last time you ran it and the current trunk, but I could still have missed things obvious. Thanks Lin On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Joseph Bergmark bergm

Re: CDI TCK Issues

I agree with you. The spec doesn't seem to provide any requirement that decorators should be injected directly into a) The injection point of the Decorated bean or b) each other. I guess I'm sure sure how you can validate a TCK test with secondary evidence and the intentions of the EG. It seems

Re: ready for take off?

+1 for alpha-2 Sincerely, Joe On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com wrote: +1 Regards, Jakob 2010/8/21 Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com +1 regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in

Re: Failover Service

I suspect a lot of servers proactively propagate the session information across servers in case a failover occurs. Once the session itself has failed over then they will stay on that server, but the data might have been moved over in lots of little chunks before then. Sincerely, Joe On Thu,

Re: DefaultContextsService question

Makes sense to me. Seems it should be shared across the whole app and not ThreadLocal. Sincerely, Joe On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Hoi! Why is it needed to hold the ApplicationContext in a ThreadLocal?    private static

Re: [VOTE] 2nd try: release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.0.0-alpha-1

+1, looks good to me. Sincerely, Joe On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.comwrote: Great job Mark! This is my +1; Thanks; --Gurkan From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Sent: Tue,

Re: [VOTE] release openwebbeans build-tools-1.0.0

+1 On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Source release:

Re: forced checkstyle runs

Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: can you please post me the log you get? txs and LieGrue, strub --- On Mon, 6/14/10, Joseph Bergmark bergm...@gmail.com wrote: From: Joseph Bergmark bergm...@gmail.com Subject: Re: forced checkstyle runs To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Monday, June

Re: JIRA for OSGi things?

If there isn't an existing JIRA issue, I'd vote create a new one. I found another small issue yesterday while working on Abstract Decorators. Basically the JavassistProxyFactory uses a bunch of static maps for its caches. Those maps all get cleared when the AbstractLifecycle stop occurs. It

Re: New Release

In general this sounds good. Is the goal to have 100% TCK passing using the 1.0.X stream of the TCK? We still have at least a couple of outstanding spec issues that I'm aware of: 1) Abstract decorators don't work - I'm working on this now, my dog had to be taken to the vet and lost my focus on

Re: tck artifacts not resolving?

Specifically about 1.0.x vs 1.1.x, I think 1.0.X is the version that needs to be passed to be considered compliant right? 1.1.X is the stream they are adding new test cases to as they go. Sincerely, Joe On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Yes, but in this

Re: Need to switch to subclassing?

I don't have Gurkan's experience in the spec, but this seems to be what section 7.2 is all about. When do you treat a method call as a business method invocation, and how does that affect things like Decorators and Interceptor invocation. The only wording that hints this shouldn't work when

Re: [jira] Commented: (OWB-369) Static ContextsService in ContextFactory causes wrong webContextService used for multiple applications

own instance. Sincerely, Joe On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Joseph Bergmark bergm...@apache.orgwrote: I'm not sure I understand the point you are trying to make here Gurkan. Are you saying you do not want to make changes that will allow OpenWebBeans to work in tiered classloading

Re: svn commit: r933348 - in /openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/intercept: ApplicationScopedBeanIntereptorHandler.java DependentScopedBeanInterceptorHandler.java Int

I know I'm jumping into the conversation a bit late, but Im trying to catch up and get my head in the game a bit. I looked over the code, and read over Mark's example scenario earlier, which I'll paste a snippet of: And now consider a webserver with 10.000 different users clicking on the send

Re: are @PostConstruct and @PreDestroy really interceptor functions?

I agree it may not be necessary, but Gavin has strongly hinted that he expected Decorators (and maybe even Interceptors) to be implemented using subclassing. Seems our current solution works in a spec compliant way for normal scoped beans though. Not sure if any MRs to the spec will change that.

Re: Build failures

version in the main central maven repository. Thanks; --Gurkan 2010/3/8 Joseph Bergmark bergm...@apache.org It appears the last couple hudson build have been failing as the root pom.xml references webbeans-ee/pom.xml that doesn't exist. Perhaps this file was missed in a recent commit

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans-M4

packages that are not directly used by users) Thanks; --Gurkan From: Joseph Bergmark bergm...@apache.org To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Sent: Wed, March 3, 2010 12:24:34 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans-M4 I was able

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans-M4

to setup correct maven repository in his/her environments. I think that this is not a release stopper issue. Thanks; --Gurkan 2010/3/3 Joseph Bergmark bergm...@apache.org It looks like you need to add the JBoss repo both for the samples to work from the binary archives

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans-M4

I was able to verify the signature of the source and binary files. However I've run into a couple of problems 1) I added the M4 staging repo to the pom.xml of a couple of the samples from the binary tar.gz and ran them to ensure they worked as expected. Both guess and jsf2sample worked fine,

Re: TCK Report Before M4

As I am sure you are already aware I've been working on some of the Decorator based TCK tests. I've even opened at least one bug to find out you fixed it a few hours beforehand :) Primarily I've been focused on: org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.decorators.invocation.DecoratorInvocationTests (opened

Re: testng in eclipse -- can't debug from 'failed tests'

I've been running individual classes by going to either Debug or Run and then the Run Configurations (or equivalent debug configurations) and then typing in the class name beside the class radio button for a TestNG type. I haven't tried running a single class or method from inside the result tab

Re: InjectionResolver.implResolveByName performance

2.0 named artifact? It will help many projects with migration from managed beans and spring to CDI. Example: absolute-ordering namemy_excelent_renderkit/name nameopenwebbeans/name others / /absolute-ordering Joseph Bergmark píše v

Re: [jira] Commented: (OWB-286) java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/validation/Validator

I agree that the 3rd and 4th bullets in 3.6 make this a hard requirement. It seems the tradeoff to me is: 1) Additional complexity of another plugin based approach to avoid this scenario. or 2) Handling of the CNF exception inside OWB with a warning message vs. The user having to bundle an API

Re: Code Conventions

Along these lines, what is the general feeling about committing changes without an associated JIRA issue? I've been opening sometimes trivial JIRA issues in order to associate them with any commit I do, but I'm not sure if this is required or not. Also I've found the Eclipse formatter you sent a

Re: constructor invocations while creating proxy

I think this is a side affect of the way the proxy subclasses the original class and still tries to maintain the constructors (which aren't inherited in java). Sincerely, Joe On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Just a funny observation while debugging

Re: [jira] Closed: (OWB-239) JavaBeans property getter naming convention with Producer Methods gives UnsatisfiedResolutionException

Joseph Bergmark bergm...@apache.org While I agree that injecting using the @Name with the String value isn't recommended, it works right now. That said, section 3.3.8 seems to clearly indicate that the @Named qualifier for a producer method should provide a default value that follows

  1   2   >