Re: 404 for https://www.apache.org/dist/sling/KEYS

2020-03-04 Thread Konrad Windszus
ad > On 4. Mar 2020, at 17:26, Radu Cotescu wrote: > > Hi Konrad, > >> On 4 Mar 2020, at 17:16, Konrad Windszus wrote: >> >> Hi, >> after fixing the download links to ASC and SHA1 files in >> https://sling.apache.org/downloads.cgi I noticed that >

Re: [Starter] Startup detection not working reliable anymore

2020-03-05 Thread Konrad Windszus
>> wrong, but the simple use case for the starter could be achieved with a much >> simpler solution without annoying users. >> Regards >> Carsten >> On 02.03.2020 09:12, Konrad Windszus wrote: >>> This has been adjusted in the context of >>> https://issues.

Re: 404 for https://www.apache.org/dist/sling/KEYS

2020-03-05 Thread Konrad Windszus
I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19927 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19927> now. > On 5. Mar 2020, at 10:10, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 5:17 PM Konrad Windszus wrote: >> ...I noticed that https:

Re: 404 for https://www.apache.org/dist/sling/KEYS

2020-03-05 Thread Konrad Windszus
ets replaced by > https://downloads.apache.org/. > > We're asked to update all our references eventually. > > Regards > Carsten > > On 05.03.2020 10:10, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >> Hi, >> On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 5:17 PM Konrad Windszus wrote: >>> ...I not

Re: 404 for https://www.apache.org/dist/sling/KEYS

2020-03-05 Thread Konrad Windszus
, Konrad > On 5. Mar 2020, at 10:37, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > I did that for most of the download links already > (https://github.com/apache/sling-site/commit/d9c831d79013cdcb755244908f1fbe8026af70bb > > <https://github.com/apache/sling-site/commit/d9c831d79013cdcb755

Re: 404 for https://www.apache.org/dist/sling/KEYS

2020-03-05 Thread Konrad Windszus
as changed without us getting > aware of it. > > Regards > Carsten > > On 05.03.2020 11:02, Konrad Windszus wrote: >> Found it via svn log -v https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/sling/ >> >> r2679 | cziegeler | 2013-08-05 09:26:19 +0200 (Mon,

Re: 404 for https://www.apache.org/dist/sling/KEYS

2020-03-05 Thread Konrad Windszus
ything. But my memory of that time might already be > corrupted. > > Regardless, isn't the guidance now that we manage this file manually again > (reading the list at the bottom of https://people.apache.org/keys/) ? > > Regards > Carsten > > On 05.03.2020 11:14, Kon

[VOTE] Release Apache Sling Commons Johnzon 1.2.0

2020-03-09 Thread Konrad Windszus
Hi, We solved 1 issue in this release: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SLING/versions/12342227 Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesling-2217/ You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the signatures: https://gitbox.apa

New Sling Committer: Dirk Rudolph

2020-03-10 Thread Konrad Windszus
Hi Sling community, The Sling PMC has elected Dirk Rudolph as a Sling committer, and he has accepted the invitation. Please join me in welcoming Dirk! Dirk - if you want to honor the old tradition of new committers briefly introducing themselves to the list, feel free. Welcome! Konrad

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Sling Commons Johnzon 1.2.0

2020-03-12 Thread Konrad Windszus
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding): Robert, Carsten, Dan +1 (non binding): Andy I will copy this release to the Sling dist directory and promote the artifacts to the central Maven repository. Konrad

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Installer Core 3.11.0

2020-03-20 Thread Konrad Windszus
+1 (checked checksums, signatures and deployed in latest Sling Starter 12-SNAPSHOT) Konrad > On 20. Mar 2020, at 18:10, Robert Munteanu wrote: > > Hi, > > We solved 6 issues in this release: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING/fixforversion/12347164 > > Staging repository: > https:

Re: [RT] Feature archives, launcher and Sling Starter

2020-03-25 Thread Konrad Windszus
> > In any case, we should probably add support to the feature launcher to launch > feature archives directly - regardless of what we do with the starter. That's > a minor addition to the launcher rounding up our tooling story about features. What about a default lookup path for local feature

Re: Deprecate https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-installer-factory-subsystems?

2020-03-30 Thread Konrad Windszus
20, at 16:50, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > +1 > > Carsten > > On 04.03.2020 16:38, Konrad Windszus wrote: >> Hi, >> there has been only 1 release in 2015 of >> https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-installer-factory-subsystems >> >> &l

Re: [DISCUSS] Resource Mapping SPI

2020-03-30 Thread Konrad Windszus
it makes conceptually sense >> as is). Rather I‘d like to provide an SPI that allows to customize the >> way of the behavior of resourceResolver.map() - I‘m thinking of a >> ranked list of ResourceMapper services (default one being today’s >> behavior). Robert also has do

Re: Consistently failing ITs

2020-04-01 Thread Konrad Windszus
I can do releases on JCR Provider, File Provider and Package Feature but first someone should investigate org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.installer.ServerSideInstallerTest.noUntransformedResources I unfortunately won't have time to look into that this week. Konrad > On 1. Apr

Merge launchpad-testing into sling-starter

2020-04-01 Thread Konrad Windszus
Hi, does anything speak against moving the ITs from https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-launchpad-testing into https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-starter?

Re: Consistently failing ITs

2020-04-01 Thread Konrad Windszus
taller-core/commit/33eeae619c5aae2a7a52903edbdd6a85b08e0891, but processing WAR resources with the bundle transformer probably never was a good idea. So right now I tend to just remove the WAR dependency in the bundles.txt. WDYT? Konrad > On 1. Apr 2020, at 13:43, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > I can do releases on JCR

Re: Merge launchpad-testing into sling-starter

2020-04-01 Thread Konrad Windszus
ctured Resource super type: - ** Resource properties ** jcr:primaryType: nt:unstructured text: This is a test node 1585747503113 ) > On 1. Apr 2020, at 15:25, Robert Munteanu wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-04-01 at 15:02 +0200, Konrad Windszus wrote: >> Hi, >> does anything speak

Re: Consistently failing ITs

2020-04-01 Thread Konrad Windszus
t 15:21, Robert Munteanu wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-04-01 at 15:16 +0200, Konrad Windszus wrote: >> The test fails with the following output >> >> [ERROR] Tests run: 3, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time >> elapsed: 0.292 s <<< FAILURE! - in >> org.apach

Re: Consistently failing ITs

2020-04-01 Thread Konrad Windszus
? Konrad > On 1. Apr 2020, at 15:29, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Done with > https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-launchpad-test-bundles/commit/43956dd07234ddc3263ce29c5b7c3f7198ad4caf > > <https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-launchpa

Re: Consistently failing ITs

2020-04-01 Thread Konrad Windszus
t why did these not fail until now? > > Thanks, > Robert > > On Wed, 2020-04-01 at 15:39 +0200, Konrad Windszus wrote: >> IMHO there are some test which should only be executed from >> https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-launchpad-testing-war >> , name

[VOTE] JCR Installer 3.2.2, File Installer 1.2.2, Installer Packages Factory 1.0.2

2020-04-02 Thread Konrad Windszus
Hi, We solved several issues in these releases: JCR Installer 3.2.2: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SLING/versions/12347037 File Installer 1.2.2: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SLING/versions/12347038 Installer Packages Factory 1.0.2: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/S

[RESULT] [VOTE] JCR Installer 3.2.2, File Installer 1.2.2, Installer Packages Factory 1.0.2

2020-04-06 Thread Konrad Windszus
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding): Carsten, Radu, Robert I will copy this release to the Sling dist directory and promote the artifacts to the central Maven repository. Thanks, Konrad

Re: Consistently failing ITs

2020-04-06 Thread Konrad Windszus
2020-04-01 at 16:06 +0200, Robert Munteanu wrote: >> Sounds like a reasonable explanation to me. >> >> Thanks, >> Robert >> >> On Wed, 2020-04-01 at 16:03 +0200, Konrad Windszus wrote: >>> What I assume happened was the following: >>> >>&

Enabling JIRA Github Integration

2020-04-07 Thread Konrad Windszus
Hi, I asked in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19695 about enabling a Github JIRA integration so that commits automatically become visible in the related JIRA ticket. The standard Atlassian JIRA Github integration cannot be used b

Re: [VOTE] Deprecate org.apache.launchpad.test-services-war

2020-04-09 Thread Konrad Windszus
For me the tests are interesting (although an edge case). But the deployment should not be as a bundle into OSGi but rather as a dedicated 2nd war (https://www.eclipse.org/jetty/documentation/9.4.x/jetty-maven-plugin.html#deploy-war-running-pre-assembled-war

Re: [VOTE] Deprecate org.apache.launchpad.test-services-war

2020-04-10 Thread Konrad Windszus
lar bundle). Then I am clearly +1 for deprecating it, because we already have a lot of other regularly registered Sling servlets! Konrad > On 10. Apr 2020, at 11:11, Robert Munteanu wrote: > > Hi Konrad, > > On Thu, 2020-04-09 at 18:25 +0200, Konrad Windszus wrote: >> F

Re: Deprecate the org.apache.sling.scripting.sightly.models.provider module?

2020-04-15 Thread Konrad Windszus
There is one important difference: The Java Use Provider uses adaptTo(...)(https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-scripting-sightly/blob/a0f0e77a30ecf3091cfa69d21ff46e0994e4e19f/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/scripting/sightly/impl/engine/extension/use/JavaUseProvider.java#L160

Re: Deprecate the org.apache.sling.scripting.sightly.models.provider module?

2020-04-15 Thread Konrad Windszus
original exception in a > org.apache.sling.scripting.sightly.SightlyException (RuntimeException) and > throw. > > Thanks, > Radu > >> On 15 Apr 2020, at 17:07, Konrad Windszus wrote: >> >> There is one important difference: The Java Use Provider uses >> adapt

Re: Deprecate the org.apache.sling.scripting.sightly.models.provider module?

2020-04-15 Thread Konrad Windszus
scu wrote: > > But that already happens in this case. If none of the Use providers can > provide an object the HTL engine throws a SightlyException. The logging I > mentioned is only supposed to help with debugging. > >> On 15 Apr 2020, at 17:56, Konrad Windszus wrote: &

Re: Deprecate the org.apache.sling.scripting.sightly.models.provider module?

2020-04-16 Thread Konrad Windszus
t; Thanks, > Radu > >> On 15 Apr 2020, at 19:09, Konrad Windszus wrote: >> >> Wrapping the exception is ok as long as the old exception is still >> accessible. One can easily write a ServletFilter which catches (and unwraps) >> the exception to throw the 500!

[VOTE] Release Apache Sling Commons Johnzon version 1.2.2

2020-04-22 Thread Konrad Windszus
Hi, We solved 1 issue in this release: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-9218 Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesling-2244/ You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the signatures: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Sling Commons Johnzon version 1.2.2

2020-04-26 Thread Konrad Windszus
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding): Carsten, Karl, Nicolas +1 (non-binding): Eri I will copy this release to the Sling dist directory and promote the artifacts to the central Maven repository. Konrad > On 22. Apr 2020, at 15:48, Konrad Windszus wr

Re: [website] build marked as failed, needs git identity

2020-04-27 Thread Konrad Windszus
This used to work for previous commits (https://github.com/apache/sling-site/commits/asf-site ) so I guess something changed with the Jenkins node... I guess INFRA needs to look into that. > On 27. Apr 2020, at 16:05, Bertrand Delacretaz

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Installer Core 3.11.4

2020-04-27 Thread Konrad Windszus
+1 Konrad > On 27. Apr 2020, at 19:16, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > Hi, > > > We solved 2 issues in this release: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-9400?jql=project%20%3D%20SLING%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%22Installer%20Core%203.11.4%22 > > Staging repository: > https://reposito

Re: [VOTE] Move OSGi Installer Support for feature models to its own git repository

2020-04-28 Thread Konrad Windszus
+1 but I would appreciate if the error logging feature (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-6176 ) would be leveraged in all setFinishState calls (https://github.com/apache/sling-whiteboard/blob/0f6b6fb68294aa252f88c7cd0c3c2b94b3bcfa1a/o

Re: Ianal Maven Plugin?

2020-04-30 Thread Konrad Windszus
It is still listed here: https://www.mojohaus.org/plugins.html but was not (yet) moved to Github nor is any documentation available at the www.mojohaus.org Maybe some of the alternatives listed in http://syncope-dev.1063484.n5.n

Re: [website] build marked as failed, needs git identity

2020-04-30 Thread Konrad Windszus
at only started failing only recently? Konrad > On 27. Apr 2020, at 16:47, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > This used to work for previous commits > (https://github.com/apache/sling-site/commits/asf-site) so I guess something > changed with the Jenkins node... > > I guess INFRA

Re: [website] build marked as failed, needs git identity

2020-04-30 Thread Konrad Windszus
I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-9414 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-9414> to allow to disable SonarQube for this job. > On 30. Apr 2020, at 21:44, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > I had a closer look and the funny thing is that this fails not during

Sling Starter 12-SNAPSHOT java.lang.InterruptedException

2020-05-03 Thread Konrad Windszus
Hi, I just experienced this exception when starting Sling Starter 12-SNAPSHOT: 03.05.2020 11:22:33.372 *INFO* [CM Event Dispatcher (Fire ConfigurationEvent: pid=org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.security.user.action.DefaultAuthorizableActionProvider)] org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.internal.Sec

Re: Sling Starter 12-SNAPSHOT java.lang.InterruptedException

2020-05-04 Thread Konrad Windszus
Hi Robert, thanks for your response. I agree with all points except for > One option is to ask Oak to > make a configuration required for some components [3], but IMO this is > not fixing the root cause. Oak is not to blame for the way we manage > components and configurations. > IMHO every OSGi

Re: Building a main + test jar from the provisioning model

2020-05-05 Thread Konrad Windszus
Hi Robert, I guess you need some tweaks in https://github.com/apache/sling-slingstart-maven-plugin/blob/5bbdae1d61698ac202845e5f242ecc8b602e7ed6/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/maven/slingstart/run/StartMojo.java#L366. The launchpad to start must consist of the merged 2 provisioning models, so mos

Re: Ianal Maven Plugin?

2020-05-05 Thread Konrad Windszus
Hi, interesting finding but unfortunately last updated in 2008 ( https://search.maven.org/artifact/org.apache.geronimo.genesis.plugins/tools-maven-plugin). Seems dead as well Konrad > On 5. May 2020, at 17:19, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > Hi, > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:23 AM Robert

[VOTE] Release Apache Sling Installer Configuration Admin Support version 1.3.2

2020-05-07 Thread Konrad Windszus
Hi, We solved 1 issues in this release: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-9408 Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesling-2257 You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the signatures: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Installer Packages Factory 1.0.4

2020-05-08 Thread Konrad Windszus
+1 Konrad > Am 08.05.2020 um 13:31 schrieb Robert Munteanu : > > Hi, > > We solved 1 issue in this release: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING/fixforversion/12347878 > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesling-2261/ > > You can use t

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Installer Configuration Admin Support version 1.3.2

2020-05-11 Thread Konrad Windszus
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding): Carsten, Dan, Georg I will copy this release to the Sling dist directory and promote the artifacts to the central Maven repository. Thanks for voting, Konrad > On 7. May 2020, at 18:07, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Parent 39, Apache Sling Bundle Parent 39, Apache Sling Jar Resource Bundle 1.0.2

2020-05-11 Thread Konrad Windszus
> On 11. May 2020, at 09:32, Robert Munteanu wrote: > > Please vote to approve this release: +1 Konrad

Re: Reproducible builds documentation? (was: [jira] [Closed] (SLING-9307) Make build fully reproducible)

2020-05-14 Thread Konrad Windszus
Hi, Yes, all bundles built with the latest parent should be reproducible (i.e. generate always the same checksum under certain circumstances). There is some documentation at https://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-reproducible-builds.html

Re: Reproducible builds documentation? (was: [jira] [Closed] (SLING-9307) Make build fully reproducible)

2020-05-14 Thread Konrad Windszus
Maven-release-plugin will update it automatically during the release. So it is just a one time thing to add it with an arbitrary value to the pom.xml > On 14. May 2020, at 11:59, Robert Munteanu wrote: > > I think it would be nice to configure the release process to > automatically add the proj

Release Sling IDE 1.2.4

2020-05-14 Thread Konrad Windszus
Hi, the last release of the Sling IDE is from February 2018. Since then some issues have been fixed https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SLING/versions/12342835 . WDYT about a new release. Since signing is tricky I would apprecia

Re: Release Sling IDE 1.2.4

2020-05-19 Thread Konrad Windszus
020, at 13:23, Robert Munteanu wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-05-14 at 13:17 +0200, Robert Munteanu wrote: >> Hi Konrad, >> >> On Thu, 2020-05-14 at 13:12 +0200, Konrad Windszus wrote: >>> Hi, >>> the last release of the Sling IDE is from February 2018

Re: Documentation for content-package based development

2020-05-31 Thread Konrad Windszus
I enriched a bit further with regards to OSGi installer support in https://github.com/apache/sling-site/commit/b0951a5c2fb56b68d036d2e52a5adf488a19d8f0 > On 8. May 2020, at 16:53, Robert Munteanu wrote: > >

Check if bundle resolves during build

2020-05-31 Thread Konrad Windszus
Hi, I recently integrated https://github.com/bndtools/bnd/tree/master/maven/bnd-resolver-maven-plugin in the FileVault plugin [1] and I would propose to do something similar for Sling. That way incompatibilities of bundles would be more visible (and not only once you integrate those in the star

Re: Intra Sling Calls

2020-06-01 Thread Konrad Windszus
If you don’t have a request at hand it will be impossible to implement fully. If you have a request just use regular request dispatching. Konrad > Am 02.06.2020 um 08:21 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler : > > So you want to make an HTTP request from within Sling to itself? > I wouldn't recommend doing

Re: Check if bundle resolves during build

2020-06-02 Thread Konrad Windszus
1. May 2020, at 16:42, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Hi, > I recently integrated > https://github.com/bndtools/bnd/tree/master/maven/bnd-resolver-maven-plugin > in the FileVault plugin [1] and I would propose to do something similar for > Sling. > > That way incompatibilitie

Adding Maven Central badge to all readmes

2020-06-06 Thread Konrad Windszus
Hi, we already have helpful badges in all readmes. I would like to see a Maven Central badge though like in https://github.com/apache/maven-release/blob/master/README.md with a link to https://search.maven.org/ with a filter to the related artifact. That way one can quickly find the latest rele

[VOTE] Apache Sling Models Validation Implementation version 1.0.0

2020-06-07 Thread Konrad Windszus
Hi, We solved 7 issues in this release: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SLING/versions/12332542 Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesling-2277/ You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the signatures: https://gitbox.apach

Re: [VOTE] Apache Sling Models Validation Implementation version 1.0.0

2020-06-08 Thread Konrad Windszus
> > > https://builds.apache.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/Sling%2Fsling-org-apache-sling-models-validation-impl/detail/master/79/pipeline > > Thanks, > Robert > >> On Sun, 2020-06-07 at 11:21 +0200, Konrad Windszus wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We solved 7 issues

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Sling Models Validation Implementation version 1.0.0

2020-06-10 Thread Konrad Windszus
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding): Carsten, Robert, Dan +1 (non binding): Andy I will copy this release to the Sling dist directory and promote the artifacts to the central Maven repository. Konrad > On 7. Jun 2020, at 11:21, Konrad Windszus wrote: >

Re: [Discuss] Thoughts about renaming the 'master' branches to 'main'?

2020-06-14 Thread Konrad Windszus
+1 as well. For the default branch we need infra. PRs targeting master are automatically closed once master is removed, so we first need to script retargeting all open PR towards the new 'main' branch before deleting the old 'master'. Konrad > On 14. Jun 2020, at 16:49, Daniel Klco wrote: > >

Re: Feature Model How-To Series Proposal

2020-06-17 Thread Konrad Windszus
For the maven-plugins let us rely on the generated site (which evaluates javadoc and other metainformation already nicely) and allows to use MD for additional pages. I prefer that for maven-plugins over a big readme as generating the site is a no-brainer during the release and has a standard fo

Re: Feature Model How-To Series Proposal

2020-06-17 Thread Konrad Windszus
ble-> Konrad > On 17. Jun 2020, at 15:41, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > Releasing the site requires extra steps which easily gets forgotten. > Right now, the majority of the documentation is in the README in git and the > site points to that file > > Carsten > > > A

Prevent Default Sling Post servlet from ever processing certain requests

2020-06-18 Thread Konrad Windszus
Hi, it is quite common that applications register custom POST servlet (via OSGi DS) to a certain resource type. If that custom POST servlet component for whatever reason is not running the default Sling POST servlet will kick in. That is never intended and will in the worst case add content to t

Re: Prevent Default Sling Post servlet from ever processing certain requests

2020-06-18 Thread Konrad Windszus
repo. The error message is not very verbose though, but good enough for my purpose. Alternatively one can use "nop" as value for ":operation" together with parameter ":nopstatus" set to 500. > On 18. Jun 2020, at 15:27, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > >

Re: Prevent Default Sling Post servlet from ever processing certain requests

2020-06-18 Thread Konrad Windszus
t; Karl >> >> On Thursday, June 18, 2020, Bertrand Delacretaz >> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 2:46 PM Konrad Windszus >>> wrote: >>>> ...Is there a simple way (like a certain parameter or request path >>> format) which prevents t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Installer Vault Package Install Hook 1.0.4

2018-11-09 Thread Konrad Windszus
+1 Konrad > On 9. Nov 2018, at 13:42, Georg Henzler wrote: > > Hi, > > We solved 1 issues in this release: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING/fixforversion/12344427 > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesling-2010 > > You can use thi

Re: [servlets] SLING-8170 - Allow Sling servlets to declare a resource super type

2018-12-11 Thread Konrad Windszus
I am not sure I do understand 100% your use case: How are you supposed to do request dispatching to another servlet then? Only in case request dispatching is used I see an actual benefit (to only overwrite one part of a servlet but not another). There you would need to rely on selectors (instead

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling API 2.20.0, Apache Sling Servlets Resolver 2.5.0, Apache Sling Servlet Annotations 1.2.2

2018-12-13 Thread Konrad Windszus
Hi Radu, I don't really understand the fix in https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-servlets-annotations/commit/9cc022fa517a858e96229e8629b0102914abb435 . The previou

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling API 2.20.0, Apache Sling Servlets Resolver 2.5.0, Apache Sling Servlet Annotations 1.2.2

2018-12-13 Thread Konrad Windszus
Thanks, Konrad > On 13. Dec 2018, at 23:11, Radu Cotescu wrote: > > Hi Konrad, > >> On 13 Dec 2018, at 19:44, Konrad Windszus wrote: >> >> Hi Radu, >> I don't really understand the fix in >> https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sl

Re: [jdk bug] for those of you on Mac running JDK 1.8

2018-12-18 Thread Konrad Windszus
Thanks a lot for that. Observed that as well but haven't had the time to investigate. I fear though that Oracle will no longer fix stuff in JDK 8. Konrad > On 18. Dec 2018, at 16:51, Radu Cotescu wrote: > > Hi, > > I’ve submitted yesterday this bug [0] to Oracle. TL;DR: one cannot build the >

Re: [jdk bug] for those of you on Mac running JDK 1.8

2018-12-18 Thread Konrad Windszus
I think due to that we should enforce building with at least Java 9. WDYT? > On 18. Dec 2018, at 16:54, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Thanks a lot for that. Observed that as well but haven't had the time to > investigate. I fear though that Oracle will no longer fix stuff i

Re: [jdk bug] for those of you on Mac running JDK 1.8

2018-12-18 Thread Konrad Windszus
t's worth noting that it only affects Mac builds so far, so enforcing > Java 9 might be a step too far. > > Robert > > On Tue, 2018-12-18 at 17:01 +0100, Konrad Windszus wrote: >> I think due to that we should enforce building with at least Java 9. >> WDYT?

Re: [jdk bug] for those of you on Mac running JDK 1.8

2019-01-05 Thread Konrad Windszus
Dec 2018, at 17:35, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > We can still put it in a dedicated profile which is only active on a Mac. > I would volunteer to add it to the parent pom since a lot of modules are > affected (as the IntelliJ Null annotations are used all over the place). > > Ko

Re: [jdk bug] for those of you on Mac running JDK 1.8

2019-01-07 Thread Konrad Windszus
I did some more tests, and the problem is the class https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-api/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/spi/resource/provider/ResolveContext.java

Re: [jdk bug] for those of you on Mac running JDK 1.8

2019-01-07 Thread Konrad Windszus
rating systems if necessary. > On 5. Jan 2019, at 17:23, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Since this does not seem to affect all cases where the IntelliJ null > annotations are used I would recommend we enforce building with Java 9+ only > for the Sling API part for Mac OS X for now. W

Re: [jdk bug] for those of you on Mac running JDK 1.8

2019-01-07 Thread Konrad Windszus
Can anyone check on Windows? Then I would always enable that profile! > On 7. Jan 2019, at 10:13, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > FWIW I get the same error with Ubuntu and Java8 > > > Regards > > Carsten > > > Konrad Windszus wrote >> I enforced now

Re: [jdk bug] for those of you on Mac running JDK 1.8

2019-01-07 Thread Konrad Windszus
gards > > Carsten > > > Konrad Windszus wrote >> Can anyone check on Windows? >> Then I would always enable that profile! >>> On 7. Jan 2019, at 10:13, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >>> >>> FWIW I get the same error with Ubuntu and Java8 >>&

Re: [jdk bug] for those of you on Mac running JDK 1.8

2019-01-07 Thread Konrad Windszus
te a .sling-module.xml for the API module setting an explicit property via ? Thanks for your input, Konrad > On 7. Jan 2019, at 11:21, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Thanks for the confirmation. Always activated the profile now in > https://github.com/apache/sling-org-

Re: [DISCUSS] integration of sling models with context-aware configuration - which way around

2019-01-07 Thread Konrad Windszus
+1 for c) > On 7. Jan 2019, at 13:32, Stefan Seifert wrote: > > there is a wish to integrate sling models with context-aware configuration to > add a new injector and injector annotation that allows to inject > context-aware configuration typed objects or property values in your sling > mode

Re: [jdk bug] for those of you on Mac running JDK 1.8

2019-01-07 Thread Konrad Windszus
IMHO no need to enforce building with Java 11. It is just that you need Java 9 or newer to circumvent that bug. But you can use Java 11 as well if you want to, but I don't see a reason to enforce that right now. > On 7. Jan 2019, at 14:11, Julian Reschke wrote: > > On 2019-01-07

Re: [jdk bug] for those of you on Mac running JDK 1.8

2019-01-07 Thread Konrad Windszus
; On 7. Jan 2019, at 13:27, Radu Cotescu wrote: > > Hi Konrad, > >> On 7 Jan 2019, at 11:40, Konrad Windszus wrote: >> >> or should I create a .sling-module.xml for the API module setting an >> explicit property via > > I find this approach cleaner and easi

Re: [jdk bug] for those of you on Mac running JDK 1.8

2019-01-08 Thread Konrad Windszus
Fixed now via https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8202 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8202>. > On 7. Jan 2019, at 14:45, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Tried to do this with > https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apach

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Commons HTML 1.0.4

2019-01-14 Thread Konrad Windszus
-1 due to incorrect semantic versioning. For details please check out https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-commons-html/pull/1#discussion_r247569311 . > On 14. Jan 2019, at 15:49, Jason E Bai

Re: rename sling-maven-sling-plugin git repo?

2019-01-14 Thread Konrad Windszus
This should be possible via INFRA. Compare e.g. with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16017?filter=-4&jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20text%20~%20%22rename%20git%22%20order%20by%20created%20DESC > Am 14.01.2019 um 20:53 schrieb Stefan Seifert : > > should we rename the github repo as

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Commons HTML version 1.1.0

2019-01-17 Thread Konrad Windszus
+1 Konrad > On 17. Jan 2019, at 18:47, Jason E Bailey wrote: > > Hi, > > We solved 2 issues in this release: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SLING/versions/12343276 > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesling-2038/ > > You can use thi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling bnd Plugins 0.0.2

2019-01-28 Thread Konrad Windszus
Also this particular plugin has a longer history, because you first tried to publish it via Felix in the context of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Aall-tabpanel which triggered also a longer discussion. The outcome is not ob

Sling Context-Aware Configuration: ConfigurationBuilder method to check for the existence of a CAC

2019-02-04 Thread Konrad Windszus
Usually I prefer the "High Level" CAC API (https://sling.apache.org/documentation/bundles/context-aware-configuration/context-aware-configuration.html#context-aware-configurations) over the "Low-Level" one descriped at https://sling.apache.org/documentation/bundles/context-aware-configuration/co

Release of OSGi Mock

2019-02-05 Thread Konrad Windszus
OSGi Mock is now compatible with DS 1.4 (at least to a certain degree), thanks to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8244 . Does anything speak against releasing it soon? There is still the known issue, that not all bind method signature

Re: Sling Context-Aware Configuration: ConfigurationBuilder method to check for the existence of a CAC

2019-02-11 Thread Konrad Windszus
eck if there is an underlying CAC but maybe a more explicit method still would make sense. WDYT? > On 4. Feb 2019, at 16:33, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Usually I prefer the "High Level" CAC API > (https://sling.apache.org/documentation/bundles/context-aware

Re: Sling Context-Aware Configuration: ConfigurationBuilder method to check for the existence of a CAC

2019-02-11 Thread Konrad Windszus
track this improvement. > On 11. Feb 2019, at 13:11, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Actually one can use ConfigurationBuilder.asValueMap().isEmpty() > (https://sling.apache.org/apidocs/sling11/org/apache/sling/caconfig/ConfigurationBuilder.html#asValueMap-- > > <https://sling

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Testing OSGi Mock 2.4.6

2019-02-12 Thread Konrad Windszus
+1 Konrad > On 12. Feb 2019, at 10:15, Stefan Seifert wrote: > > sorry - again with correct repository id ... > > -Original Message- > From: Stefan Seifert [mailto:sseif...@pro-vision.de] > Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 9:36 PM > To: 'dev@sling.apache.org' > Subject: [VOTE] Release A

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Pipes 3.1.0

2019-02-12 Thread Konrad Windszus
> > 2. Baselining check fails, but looks like a tooling error rather than > an actual problem > > [INFO] --- bnd-baseline-maven-plugin:3.5.0:baseline (default) @ > org.apache.sling.pipes --- > [INFO] Automatically determining the baseline version for > org.apache.sling:org.apache.sling.pipes:j

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Pipes 3.1.0

2019-02-12 Thread Konrad Windszus
Sorry, didn't look closely enough. Actually the error is fixed in bnd-baseline-maven-plugin 4.0 or newer (was reported in https://github.com/bndtools/bnd/issues/2248 <https://github.com/bndtools/bnd/issues/2248>). > On 12. Feb 2019, at 12:53, Konrad Windszus wrote: > >

Sling Models: child-resources injector

2019-02-25 Thread Konrad Windszus
The child resources injector (https://sling.apache.org/documentation/bundles/models.html#available-injectors) currently always returns Resources which can then be adapted into Models. As some models only allow adaptations from SlingHttpServletRequests I think we could extend the injector to opt

OSGi Installer Configuration - Primitive Arrays

2019-02-27 Thread Konrad Windszus
Despite the documentation at https://sling.apache.org/documentation/bundles/configuration-installer-factory.html#configuration-files-config also primitive types are supporte

Re: OSGi Installer Configuration - Primitive Arrays

2019-03-05 Thread Konrad Windszus
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 7:06 PM Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> >> +1 its always good to document reality...unless its a bug of course :) >> >> Carsten >> >> >> Georg Henzler wrote >>> If it works I'm +1 to document it... >>> &g

Re: OSGi Installer Configuration - Primitive Arrays

2019-03-05 Thread Konrad Windszus
Slight correction a Collection of Objects is supposed to be serialized e.g. as I(1,2) I am wondering under which circumstances an array of Objects, e.g. I[1,2] is being emitted? > On 5. Mar 2019, at 12:28, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Well, if I read the OSGi metatype spec correctly

Re: OSGi Installer Configuration - Primitive Arrays

2019-03-14 Thread Konrad Windszus
el > strongly about it - just trying to point out what I see. > > Wrt. the metatype spec, yes, it seems like it should be primitive or > list of things - not sure I would add that to the supported types > (seems like a head-age nobody is asking for - but YMMV), afaik, we > don't re

Re: OSGi Installer Configuration - Primitive Arrays

2019-03-14 Thread Konrad Windszus
if the >>> webconsole has been used). However, alternatively we could just fix >>> the writeback to convert to none primitive array. I don't feel >>> strongly about it - just trying to point out what I see. >>> >>> Wrt. the metatype spec,

Re: OSGi Installer Configuration - Primitive Arrays

2019-03-14 Thread Konrad Windszus
> On 14. Mar 2019, at 11:23, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > > >> On 14. Mar 2019, at 10:19, Karl Pauls > <mailto:karlpa...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >>> So I don't agree with >>>> The point that we for the writeback don't >>

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >