Re: [action1] cleaning up the build

On 4/18/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We definitely need an action/src/site directory to contain > the root site.xml that others inherit, and if you can get > over the aforementioned issue, then collecting all docs > there would work for me. I moved action/core/src/site up to src/sit

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26322] - WebLogic hot-deploy breaks Tiles

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26322] - WebLogic

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r395128 - /struts/action/trunk/pom.xml

Author: wsmoak Date: Tue Apr 18 21:12:48 2006 New Revision: 395128 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395128&view=rev Log: Add reporting config for the Javadoc plugin. (Aggregation will only work with 2.0-SNAPSHOT.) Modified: struts/action/trunk/pom.xml Modified: struts/action/trunk/po

svn commit: r395126 - /struts/action/trunk/core/src/site/

Author: wsmoak Date: Tue Apr 18 21:11:48 2006 New Revision: 395126 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395126&view=rev Log: Move documentation up to top-level Struts Action site. (Part 2) Removed: struts/action/trunk/core/src/site/

svn commit: r395124 - in /struts/action/trunk/src: ./ site/

Author: wsmoak Date: Tue Apr 18 21:10:42 2006 New Revision: 395124 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395124&view=rev Log: Move documentation up to top-level Struts Action site. (Part 1) Added: struts/action/trunk/src/ struts/action/trunk/src/site/ - copied from r395117, struts/

Re: A clean way to separate "view" actions from "update" actions

Could/should the "nice to haves" be moved to their own page? There are a few items that I'd like to add but they are not really appropriate for the rough spots page. Cheers, Eric On 4/18/06, Bob Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, the first couple paragraphs in the DefaultActionMapper secti

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39121] - [Shale] Implement use of Commons Validator Javascript

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: A clean way to separate "view" actions from "update" actions

Also, the first couple paragraphs in the DefaultActionMapper section describe how WebWork handles this sort of dispatching: http://opensymphony.com/webwork/wikidocs/ActionMapper.html Bob On 4/18/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I decided to pull this out to the mailing list to

Re: A clean way to separate "view" actions from "update" actions

I'll buy that, but users should understand that malicious users can put HTML like this on other sites: http://yoursite/deleteAccount";> That's not to say that POSTs are 100% immune to this sort of thing. They're just slightly less susceptible. The safe solution is to emded some sort of unique tok

A clean way to separate "view" actions from "update" actions

I decided to pull this out to the mailing list to keep Rough Spots page [1] cleaner. crazybob: "Come up with a clean way to separate "view" actions from "update" actions. ... [As one of the options] we could flag action invocations as "view" or "update" (using an enum). We could automatically choo

[Struts Wiki] Update of "RoughSpots" by Bob Lee

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by Bob Lee: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots -- - Some things tha

[Struts Wiki] Trivial Update of "RoughSpots" by TedHusted

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by TedHusted: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots The comment on the change is: Conform pronouns to use "we" throughout ---

[Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsAction2" by TedHusted

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by TedHusted: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsAction2 -- Ge

[Struts Wiki] Update of "RoughSpots" by Bob Lee

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by Bob Lee: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots -- 1. `TextPr

[Struts Wiki] Update of "FormView" by angelozerr

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by angelozerr: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/FormView -- * add styl

[Struts Wiki] Update of "RoughSpots" by MichaelJouravlev

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by MichaelJouravlev: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots The comment on the change is: Plugged in EventActionDispatcher information ---

[Struts Wiki] Trivial Update of "EventActionDispatcher" by WendySmoak

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by WendySmoak: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/EventActionDispatcher --

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

This is a great list, thanks for taking the time to put it up. I may not agree with everything, but it is sure to spark conversation :) Don Bob Lee wrote: On 4/18/06, Bob Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'll set up the "rough spots" page. http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots?action=show

[Struts Wiki] Trivial Update of "RoughSpots" by Bob Lee

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by Bob Lee: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots -- == Nice to h

[Struts Wiki] Update of "RoughSpots" by Bob Lee

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by Bob Lee: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots -- addActionEr

[Struts Wiki] Update of "RoughSpots" by Bob Lee

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by Bob Lee: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots -- 1. On the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39121] - [Shale] Implement use of Commons Validator Javascript

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Struts Wiki] Update of "RoughSpots" by Bob Lee

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by Bob Lee: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots -- - * Looking up

[ANN] JAVAWUG BOF XVII / Friday 28th April 2006 @ 19:00 / Oracl e City of London

Dear All The JAVAWUG (Java Web User Group) has rescheduled the BOF XVIII (Number 17) from Thursday 20th April to now Friday 20th April 2006. The birds-of-feather will still take place at the same venue, Oracle's City of London office between 7-9:30 pm. The presentations are and the confirme

[Struts Wiki] Update of "RoughSpots" by Bob Lee

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by Bob Lee: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots -- - * Looking up a

[Struts Wiki] Update of "RoughSpots" by Bob Lee

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by Bob Lee: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots -- - Describe RoughS

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

On 4/18/06, Bob Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll set up the "rough spots" page. http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots?action=show Bob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PR

[Struts Wiki] Update of "RoughSpots" by Bob Lee

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by Bob Lee: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots New page: Describe RoughSpots here. ---

[Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsAction2" by Bob Lee

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by Bob Lee: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsAction2 -- Gene

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

You mean we have committers who aren't running 1.5 yet? For shame. ;) I'll set up the "rough spots" page. Bob On 4/18/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When a committer votes +1 on a release, it's taken to mean that the > committer is using the release in production his or herself, and

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

On 4/18/06, Bob Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Without saying whether we should support 1.4 or not, realistically > we're talking about Struts 2.0.0 in production some time after August > depending how long it takes users to port their applications, not > right now, at this moment, right? JDK 1.6

[action2] Java 5 support (was XWork and Struts Action 2.0)

This has been a topic I've been wondering about for a while: would it be possible to move to Java 5, then use a tool such as Retroweaver [1] to provide Java 1.4 support? I'm not prepared to completely abandon Java 1.4 users, but Bob does make some good points regarding the concern for falling to

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

On 4/18/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would tend to disagree. I feel that the separate of concerns between > XWork and a web application front end are important. I don't believe > it would be helpful to start lumping things back together again. Providing Struts users with a complet

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

Ted, The below reason (3rd paragraph, man i wish yahoo did the little > things) is why we should probably decide to move XWork over now or forever hold our peace, unless of course phase I is supposed to be an alpha or preview release and phase II is mainly when Action 2 will be in production.

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

On 4/18/06, Bob Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No... but I do think we should shield Struts users from the XWork > API/documentation as much as possible (i.e. a lot more than WebWork > does). I _suppose_ it's nice that you can drop down to XWork and do > non-web things, but I don't think we need

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

Ted Husted wrote: On 4/18/06, Bob Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It will be harder for me at first, but I'd like to see us take this opportunity to smooth over some of the rough spots so we don't have to break compatibility again down the road. It would be helpful if someone started a wiki pag

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

On 4/18/06, Bob Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It will be harder for me at first, but I'd > like to see us take this opportunity to smooth over some of the rough > spots so we don't have to break compatibility again down the road. It would be helpful if someone started a wiki page to itemize the

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

On 4/18/06, Jason Carreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ahh, you're talking about forking it and copying the source into Struts > Action 2? No... but I do think we should shield Struts users from the XWork API/documentation as much as possible (i.e. a lot more than WebWork does). I _suppose_ it's

Re: [action1] cleaning up the build

Wendy Smoak wrote: On 4/14/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... to get the Javadoc generated for the site, add this to action/pom.xml: org.apache.maven.plugins maven-javadoc-plugin true

Re: [action1] cleaning up the build

On 4/14/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... to get the Javadoc generated for the > site, add this to action/pom.xml: > > > > > org.apache.maven.plugins > maven-javadoc-plugin true ...

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

> On 4/18/06, Jason Carreira > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This doesn't concern XWork itself. > > > > Huh? I thought we were talking about moving it? > > I didn't say anything about moving it. > Ahh, you're talking about forking it and copying the source into Struts Action 2? -(as many a

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

On 4/18/06, Jason Carreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This doesn't concern XWork itself. > > Huh? I thought we were talking about moving it? I didn't say anything about moving it. > Okay, so make your Action implement ServletContextAware, ServletRequestAware, > etc. I was specifically think

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

> Bob Lee wrote: > > Also, how do the tags relate to JSTL? Are we just > going to ignore > > JSTL? Or are we going to use JSTL for JSP with some > WebWork-specific > > extensions and the WebWork tags for other template > engines? > > I personally prefer the latter option. Struts has > always trie

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

> This doesn't concern XWork itself. > Huh? I thought we were talking about moving it? > The question is can Struts continue to depend on > XWork externally and > actually be cohesive? I want one comprehensive > manual. I don't > necesarily want the servlet API to be readily > available, but whe

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

Ian Roughley wrote: Don Brown wrote: Bob Lee wrote: Also, how do the tags relate to JSTL? Are we just going to ignore JSTL? Or are we going to use JSTL for JSP with some WebWork-specific extensions and the WebWork tags for other template engines? I personally prefer the latter option. Struts

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

Don Brown wrote: Bob Lee wrote: Also, how do the tags relate to JSTL? Are we just going to ignore JSTL? Or are we going to use JSTL for JSP with some WebWork-specific extensions and the WebWork tags for other template engines? I personally prefer the latter option. Struts has always tried to

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

On 4/17/06, Gabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's telling that the lion's share of code related issues we've discussed so > far about Struts > 2 on this list (Annotation driven actions, pluggability of expression > language, use of "dev > mode", etc., etc.) are really issues that should be broug