On 6/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: hermanns
Date: Wed Jun 6 10:51:00 2007
New Revision: 544898
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=544898
Log:
Updating link to 2.0.9 release notes
Issue Number: WW-1974
Modified:
struts/struts2/branches/STRUTS_2_0_X/
Update the Maven configuration to reference the new releases, build
the framework locally, and try it with your own application. If it
passes, submit to JIRA a patch to the Maven configuration. For extra
credit, play-test the example applications as well. :)
* http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/bu
[ X ] General Availability (GA)
All tests pass in AppFuse!
Also, Rainer sent me the following in an e-mail a month and a half ago. Is
it included in the release notes?
> The validators.xml files for the upcoming Struts2 2.0.8 needs to be
> adjusted.
> They are now validated against the b
On 5/3/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My hands are full with two jobs at the moment. I can roll the 1.3.9
release because Maven is easy, but I'd like someone to help out with
these pre-tasks, if anyone is available:
* Checkin release notes for 1.3.9
* Correct any site errors
(http:
[X] General Availability (GA)
Best Regards
Pedro Herrera
Rainer Hermanns wrote:
>
> The Struts 2.0.8 test build is now available.
>
> Release notes:
>
> * http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Release+Notes+2.0.8
>
> Distribution:
>
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/str
There are a few "old" libraries in the 2.0.8 release, should there be an
effort to upgrade them?, and if so whats the best way of doing it?
The libraries in question are;
antlr (2.7.2 shipped, 2.7.7 latest in 2.7 branch, theres also a v3 branch)
commons-beanutils (1.6 shipped, 1.7.0 is the late
Thanks Ted! Very minor update done now as well :)
Frank
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
AIM/Yahoo: fzammetti
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author of "Practical Ajax Projects With Java Technology"
(2006, Apress, ISBN 1-59059-695-1)
On 6/6/07, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd be happy to... I don't seem to have permissions to edit the guides
pages though
Done.
(or are these docs auto-generated by the build process?)
The ones to edit are here:
* http://struts.apache.org/2.x/index.html
The static HTML p
[X] General Availability (GA)
Rainer Hermanns wrote:
The Struts 2.0.8 test build is now available.
Release notes:
* http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Release+Notes+2.0.8
Distribution:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.8/
Maven 2 staging repository:
* http://peopl
The Struts 2.0.8 test build is now available.
Release notes:
* http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Release+Notes+2.0.8
Distribution:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.8/
Maven 2 staging repository:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.8/m2-staging-repository/
On
On Wed, June 6, 2007 1:07 pm, Ted Husted wrote:
> On 6/6/07, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> All this does however, to me anyway, mean that plugins can't really be
>> called self-contained, and saying "...can extend the framework just by
>> adding a JAR to the application's classpat
On 6/6/07, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All this does however, to me anyway, mean that plugins can't really be
called self-contained, and saying "...can extend the framework just by
adding a JAR to the application's classpath" in the documentation isn't
100% accurate (99% maybe).
On 6/6/07, Jan Hornbøll Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Which mailing list are you refering to? This one or struts user? I am
pretty sure these are genuine bugs, my humble nature just prohibits me
from making bold claims without leaving room for the possibility of me
being wrong.
From our pe
On Wed, June 6, 2007 12:57 pm, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> The whole auto-unpacking thing could quickly become a nightmare, not a
> good
> idea IMO.
Yeah, your probably right... If there was a way to ensure you didn't have
two versions of the same class in two different JARs I might feel
differently,
The whole auto-unpacking thing could quickly become a nightmare, not a good
idea IMO.
@Phil: last time I tried to get OSGi and Struts together I failed miserably,
I even feel dumber after that :). Someday I will try again, but that time I
will actually read OSGi documentation first.
musachy
On
No, I wouldn't want to repack JARs... we actually do that with Java Web
Parts with a couple of Commons packages, but what I'm working on now has a
larger number of dependencies and they are a little more complex.
Definitely wouldn't want to do any bytecode manipulation either, or any
other voodoo
Well, not all of them are verified, but it is better if they are reported
first on the list, as some times it is a duplicated issue, and then we have
to go and find the original one, and, we are lazy :)
thanks for reporting
musachy
On 6/6/07, Jan Hornbøll Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dave
Dave Newton skrev:
Actually, both issues should have been reported on the mailing list
first, so they could be verified to be bugs or just 'you being
stupid'. If you're not sure if it's a user mistake or a genuine bug,
then it's a good indication you should ask on the user list before
submitting
--- Jan Hornbøll Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Philip Luppens skrev:
>> then it's a good indication you should ask on the
>> user list before submitting it as a bug or problem.
> Which mailing list are you refering to? This one or
> struts user?
Er, user. It's also a way of discovering if th
You can also consider using Jar Jar Links ("o,
me-sa gonna muck witha your bytecodes", or if you
prefer a more recent meme, "IM UP IN UR JARZ TWEAKIN
UR PKGS") if you are coupled to a specific release and
want to ensure there's no possibility of library
conflict with webapp libs.
Dave
--- Phi
Philip Luppens skrev:
Actually, both issues should have been reported on the mailing list
first, so they could be verified to be bugs or just 'you being
stupid'. If you're not sure if it's a user mistake or a genuine bug,
then it's a good indication you should ask on the user list before
submitti
On 6/6/07, Jan Hornbøll Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello everyone.
My sincere apologies if this question should've been asked on struts-user.
I have reported 2 bugs in struts2 on jira. How long does it usually take
from a bug is repported until it is determined whether bug actually is a
bu
On 6/6/07, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everyone... I'm writing my first S2 plugin and I'm running into a
problem, which may well just be one of understanding.
I had thought that any JAR placed in the root of the plugin JAR would be
added to the path, but this seemingly isn't
Hello everyone.
My sincere apologies if this question should've been asked on struts-user.
I have reported 2 bugs in struts2 on jira. How long does it usually take
from a bug is repported until it is determined whether bug actually is a
bug and not just me being stupid?
The two issues are:
htt
Hi everyone... I'm writing my first S2 plugin and I'm running into a
problem, which may well just be one of understanding.
I had thought that any JAR placed in the root of the plugin JAR would be
added to the path, but this seemingly isn't the case. My understanding is
that a plugin JAR is a self
2007/6/6, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Some poor sod having the time to roll the release? :)
Eheh :-) You know, in Tiles we are using the Maven release plugin and
everything is much much easier...
It's a pity that you cannot use it :-P
Antonio
---
Thanks for stepping up, Rainer. If you have any questions, you know
where to find me. :)
-Ted.
On 6/5/07, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey there,
if there are no objections, I'd like to roll the 2.0.8 release tomorrow.
What is the status of WW-1943 [1]?
IIRC only a tiles release
Ted Husted wrote:
On 5/30/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At this point, we have three Confluence spaces going
... and the S2 Documentation wiki (WW) is the only one that requires a
CLA on file.
I put up the SmartURLs plugin on the plugin registry and I'm hoping to
get the document
Ya but unfortunately its not working.
Musachy Barroso wrote:
>
> That's actually an "OGNL thing", so yes, you should be able to access it
> on
> the same way.
>
> musachy
>
> On 6/6/07, Strut_developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> HI,
>> In case of webworks to access static properly i
My bad, I didn't look at the email address. Please post these questions on
the users list, as this list is for struts 2 development.
musachy
On 6/6/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's actually an "OGNL thing", so yes, you should be able to access it
on the same way.
musachy
That's actually an "OGNL thing", so yes, you should be able to access it on
the same way.
musachy
On 6/6/07, Strut_developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HI,
In case of webworks to access static properly in jsp page we used to do as
below
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-access-static-property-in-
HI,
In case of webworks to access static properly in jsp page we used to do as
below
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-access-static-property-in-jsp-page-using-struts-tf3877595.html#a10987595
Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
I am new to struts 2 (previously work with struts 1) and I try to build an
application with spring on java 1.4 (websphere 6.0). I got this error when I
try to access the deployed application:
Error Message: Filter [struts2]: could not be initialized
Error Code: 500
Target Servlet: null
Error Sta
Thanks for the clarification. I'll go back to lurking :)
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Petrelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 June 2007 09:04
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: [S2] Release Plan for 2.0.8
2007/6/6, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> 1) The performance enha
2007/6/6, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
1) The performance enhancement detailed at
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/TILES-87, which could be very
useful
in high volume sites.
This is not a "big performance problem", it's a question of some null-check
and string comparisons that are n
Hi,
I'm coming from the user side of the fence and having looked at the release
notes for tiles 2.0.4 I'd urge you to go with 2.0.4 even if it means
delaying the stuts 2.0.8 release a little.
There are a couple of reasons for this;
1) The performance enhancement detailed at
https://issues.apache
2007/6/5, David H. DeWolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The tiles 2.0.4 vote was recapped today (and passed as the first tiles2
beta). Antonio is working on finalizing/pushing the release.
The struts2-tiles plugin depends upon 2.0.3, which is already released,
so I'm not sure what the holdup is.
In
37 matches
Mail list logo
