+1
Niall
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> All,
>
> I am proposing that we change our release process so that we can
> leverage the Apache instance of Sonatype Nexus Professional. I will
> personally perform the necessary steps to get the appropriate
> information documen
t;
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 6:51 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
>>> I would like to move the Struts 1 documentation from SVN to
>>> Confluence. As old (10 years almost?!) as Struts 1 is, today it is not
>>
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>> Sorry I haven't really followed the reasoning behind bringing XWork
>> here. Who currently works on XWork and are they already Struts
>> committers
Sorry I haven't really followed the reasoning behind bringing XWork
here. Who currently works on XWork and are they already Struts
committers?
Niall
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> This is a vote for the Struts PMC to formally accept the donation of
> the XWork project fr
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 6:51 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> I would like to move the Struts 1 documentation from SVN to
> Confluence. As old (10 years almost?!) as Struts 1 is, today it is not
> possible for any community member to update it without having SVN
> commit access. I think it's too high a
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 5:19 PM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) On http://struts.apache.org/1.x/ the leftnav link to "releases" is
> http://struts.apache.org/1.x/downloads.html, which is broken.
>
> 2) On http://struts.apache.org/1.3.10/index.html the leftnav link to release
> is htt
[X] General Availability (GA)
Niall
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Struts 1.3.10 test build is now available.
>
> Release notes:
>
> * http://struts.apache.org/1.x/userGuide/release-notes.html
>
> Distribution:
>
> * http://people.apache.org/builds
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any more comments?
>
> The question has come up a few times on the user list in the last week or
> two. My proposal is an incremental improvement (if tiny); if we switch to
> commons-validator at least their JavaScript code
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The Struts 2 Starter Maven Archetype v2.0.11.2 is available for review.
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/struts-ar
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I understand it, we can't up the Struts 1 version due to a
> backwards-incompatible change made in 1.3.6 or later. If Struts 1
> releases a version that we can use without excluding other 1.3.x
> versions, I'd be happy to m
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Antonio Petrelli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> It seems that Al Sutton found an incompatible change in Struts 1.3. The
> following issue added an incompatible change to Struts 1.3:
> https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2864
>
> This leads to a c
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Antonio Petrelli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/4/8, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >
> > Would be good to clear this with the PRC - I seem to recall a similar
> > discussion where a project was crediting a compan
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exactly - I'm not suggesting we change how we accept contributions at
> all and of course, we would try to give credit to individuals where
> desired, but look at it this way: if IBM donated a server to us, would
> we credit
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Jeromy Evans
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > I just saw the following comment
> >
> > "FreeMarker is very similar to Velocity, as both are template
> > languages that can be used outside of a
I just saw the following comment
"FreeMarker is very similar to Velocity, as both are template
languages that can be used outside of a Servlet container. The
framework utilizes FreeMarker because FreeMarker has better error
reporting. However, both are good alternatives to JSP."
on this page:
ht
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 2:46 AM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PMC folk,
>
> I am still interested in patching Struts 1.x bugs as they come in and
> queuing up releases. The delay between 1.3.8 and 1.3.10 was my doubt that I
> can count on +3 binding votes for the 1.x releases. Even
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Gary Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks to those who answered my original question. The gist of the
> responses seemed to be that, no, Struts 1.3.9 will not move up to BeanUtils
> 1.8.0 (will stay at 1.7.0). So now I'm wondering why not. Is it mostly
>
You should ask this on the commons user list:
http://commons.apache.org/beanutils/mail-lists.html
...but the reason is because you have used the wrong names for keys in
your Map - the first character should be lower case (so "properyA" and
"propertyB") - this is the java beans spec
If you chang
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Antonio Petrelli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/2/28, Gary Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >
> > I couldn't find an answer to this in the 1.3.9 beta docs or in the mailing
> list archives: Does Struts 1.3.9 plan to move up to BeanUtils 1.8.0? Both
> are cu
this, but in case not the docs are here:
http://felix.apache.org/site/maven-bundle-plugin-bnd.html
Niall
> Don
>
>
> On 2/25/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Don, just a FYI - the latest release of felix's bundle plugin is
> > version 1
Don, just a FYI - the latest release of felix's bundle plugin is
version 1.2.1 (theres also a vote underway on releasing 1.4.0)
Niall
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:04 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: mrdon
> Date: Mon Feb 25 04:04:16 2008
> New Revision: 630822
>
> URL: http://svn.apache
On Feb 16, 2008 4:18 PM, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Something is really, really weird... Seems like all loading of tlds
> from jar files has stopped working. If I place the missing tlds in
> web-inf and refer to them in web.xml, I get one step furthere and then
> it fails
On Jan 16, 2008 3:47 PM, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > For the record I agree with Martin and in my book votes-are-votes
> > whoever they come from.
>
> Well, I'm reading the bylaws right now:
Yeah and missing th
On Jan 16, 2008 6:24 AM, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Cooper wrote:
> >> That's a fair question, but I have an answer for it.
> >
> > Of course you do. If you didn't, I'd think you'd gone on vacation or
> > something. ;-)
>
> :)
>
> > So you're saying that if a non-committe
On Dec 10, 2007 7:02 AM, Philip Luppens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 9, 2007 7:42 AM, Tom Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just wanted to chime in here. I have very specific goals that I am
> > trying to achieve, so I thought I would explain them in detail. (this
> > is something I
On Dec 5, 2007 4:11 AM, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, you offered help, now you're in for it :)
>
> I tried to build from the top-level directory I checked out to after a
> fresh checkout and it didn't work. I'm at a loss any time I see a Maven
> problem (which, in my experien
Back now.
Niall
On Nov 15, 2007 7:40 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2007 7:35 PM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I can't get to struts.apache.org (I can get to
> > apache.org); is anybody else seeing this?
&g
On Nov 15, 2007 7:35 PM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't get to struts.apache.org (I can get to
> apache.org); is anybody else seeing this?
Looks like its not just struts commons.apache.org, tiles.apache.org
and shale.apache.org are all not responding as well
Niall
> Thanks,
> D
IMO the link for the Apache logo should point to "www.apache.org"
rather than the ASF Sponsorship page - esp as the logo includes
"www.apache.org". IMO pusing people to sponsorship is more likely to
irritate rather than produce cash for the ASF. Unless there are
objections I'll revert the logo link
The following user is spamming the Struts Jira instance - the first time
they did it today creating ticket WW-2195 - I deleted both the Jira
ticket and user - an hour later the same thing happened - I have again
deleted the ticket below and user but since they have already re-created
the same
On 8/7/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/8/7, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > That makes sense to me. I don't remember what the decision was on
> > that. I think this has more to do with making the release managers
> > life easier than policy per se.
> >
> > I can
he AL 2.0 - go see
foo file/url for full license/copyright details" - i.e. "detached
license" - similar to signatures.
Niall
> Don
>
> On 8/7/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/7/07, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Is i
On 8/7/07, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it absolutely necessary for that huge license header to go on every
> single file? It is rather annoying to scroll through all this license
> text just for a couple-line config file. I'm also concerned it bloats
> the Javascript and CSS unneces
Discovering that there is a way to avoid having to wait 24hrs for the
mirrors to sync for security releases is a great find - good job Ted.
I'm happy with this proposed fasttrack process now.
Niall
On 8/3/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I checked with infrastructure as to the appropr
On 8/2/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So to sum up the post-mortem,
>
> Security Releases
>
> * When a serious security issue arises, we should try to create a
> #.#.#.1 branch on the last GA release, and apply to that branch only
> the security patch.
>
> * If the patch first appl
Unfortunately I found a bug in 1.3.9 which means I can't use this
version (I have 1.3.8 deployed in production):
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-3081
Since 1.3.9 is just a bugfix for 1.3.8 I think we should leave it as a
test build - although if others want it to be officially release
ks and from what I can see organising the
release took several days - and a quick "btw does anyone object to a
vote lasting x hours for the security fix?" beforehand would have been
much better.
Niall
> Don
>
> On 7/28/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On 7/23/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the interest of time, I would like to declare a quality grade on
> Struts 2.0.9 AS SOON AS we have received three binding votes toward
> one of the grades, and NOT WAIT the usual 72 hours!
I only just saw this - so basically this vote was e
On 7/20/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all!
I think that I made a mistake. The S1-Tiles 2 plugin needs Java 5 to compile
(it is declared in its pom), simply because Tiles 2 is based on Java 5 and
there is no retrotranslated published versions.
Does it create a problem when rel
On 7/6/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> I see no discussion on FILEUPLOAD-140 with Jochen about this and that
> would seem a more logical place to fix than here in Struts. If it has
> merit then you should be able to convince him - or at leas
On 7/6/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> IMO people who want to move forward should use Struts2 - Struts 1
> shouldn't break compatibilty lightly - I see no great benefit to
> changing how this has worked for 6 years and just pain for anyon
s that can cause compatibility issues don't slip in under the
radar without mention. IMO now it has been raised and discussed, if
no-one objects now then there can be no complaints later :)
Niall
Paul
Paul Benedict wrote:
> Good point.
>
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> STR-2611 ju
ince him - or at least try. I'm
no expert on file upload or DoS, but my gut feel is its a hack to fix
a problem that has nothing to do with Struts - which we've generally
resisted in the past.
Niall
Paul
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> I assume this is related to FILEUPLOAD-140[1] - Joche
s change as it is now.
Niall
Paul
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> I don't have a problem with setting the "cancellation" attribute where
> there is no form - but this changes goes further than whats mentioned
> in STR-1674 with the form no longer being populated when "cancelle
I assume this is related to FILEUPLOAD-140[1] - Jochen points out on
that ticket that this could be used for a DOS attack - so this change
doesn't look like a good idea.
Niall
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FILEUPLOAD-140
On 7/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Autho
I don't have a problem with setting the "cancellation" attribute where
there is no form - but this changes goes further than whats mentioned
in STR-1674 with the form no longer being populated when "cancelled".
This breaks compatibility with previous Struts versions and I'm
against it.
Niall
On
STR-2611 just requested more info in the logged error message - but
this change goes further because in all cases except the required
validator validation will now fail if an exception is throw accessing
the property's value - whereas before it just skipped validation. For
anyone that has relied o
On 7/3/07, sadasivarao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I am using struts and JSF using struts-faces 1.3.8.jar file and
using WSAD 5.1.2
My jsf page is like this
As soon as I click on submit button blank page displaying.
I seem to recall a couple of threads relating to S2 performance and
OGNL - so looks like it would be good for S2 to upgrade its
dependency. I guess this is probably already on the radar, but in case
its not:
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=45954
Niall
On 6/29/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone know why FormTag and OptionTag do not inherit from
BaseHandlerTag?
I don't know because I wasn't around at the start when these classes
were being developed. I'd hazard a guess though - most of the html
tags are geared around form
From a visual scan, theres a few things that don't look quite right to me.
1) setStyleIdExpr - this method is now duplicated - should have been
renamed to setTitleKeyExpr when copy/pasting? Would have thought this
doesn't compile - for me I would have hoped the code had been tested
before commit
On 6/4/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dave Johnson blogs about the new stuff coming with Roller 4.0 - one of
the main changes being migrating from Struts1-->Struts2.
http://rollerweblogger.org/roller/entry/roller_strong_1
Thinking alound...their migration experience
Dave Johnson blogs about the new stuff coming with Roller 4.0 - one of
the main changes being migrating from Struts1-->Struts2.
http://rollerweblogger.org/roller/entry/roller_strong_1
Thinking alound...their migration experience would be interesting to
see written up and seems like a great resou
I believe this was fixed in Struts 1.3.8
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2955
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=480593
Niall
On 5/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
We have found a possible bug in struts 1.3.5 (may be also in 1.3.8) during
the u
Please ask these types of questions on the Struts User list:
http://struts.apache.org/mail.html
Thanks
Niall
On 4/19/07, Deep Blue Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently using an app. server that is using servlet 2.4. I cannot get
the original query string after doing more than two
On 4/17/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I thought we were doing 1.3.9, then merging 1.3.9 onto the 1.4 trunk?
Maybe so - but still a bad idea IMO.
Niall
Hen
On 4/16/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We seem to be getting in a habit of making cha
We seem to be getting in a habit of making changes to the 1.3 Branch
and leaving them out of the trunk. Personally I think this is a bad
idea for two reasons:
1) they may get forgotten - and we release a change in 1.3 thats then
is effectively revereted when 1.4 comes out.
2) theres always the d
On 3/19/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I tried this out tonight, and I thought it was very beneficial to
cleaning up my code. In particular, not having to declare parameters
that I do not need to use.
public void execute(ActionContext context) throws Exception {
}
Steps for develo
On 3/15/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/14/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Some people consider that making a link available on the web
>> site at all should not be permitted. With that in mind, I am
>> very much against making them any more visible than th
On 3/10/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/10/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are three remaining steps to accomplish.
> * Update main website pages
> * Publish artifacts
> * Release distribution
>
> Niall is going to help with #1. Does anyone have directions on
+1 to GA.
Niall
On 3/4/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All looks good to me - I've just installed this version at work and
will vote in a couple of days, once its had some use. Thanks for doing
this Paul :-)
Niall
On 3/4/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
All looks good to me - I've just installed this version at work and
will vote in a couple of days, once its had some use. Thanks for doing
this Paul :-)
Niall
On 3/4/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Struts 1.3.8 test build is now available.
Release notes:
* http://struts.apache
face defining two
methods:
Locale resolveLocale(HttpServletRequest request);
void setLocale(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response,
Locale locale);
Niall
On 3/2/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2007/3/2, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PRO
On 2/28/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2007/2/22, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> What could be useful for Tiles is a single configurable entry-point
> from which the current Locale should be taken. I don't know if Paul
> means this.
I think Niall cleared my doubt in the
+1 for GA quality
Niall
On 2/25/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Struts 1.3.7 test build is now available.
Release notes:
* http://struts.apache.org/1.x/userGuide/release-notes.html
Distribution:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/1.3.7/
Maven 2 staging repository:
* ht
On 2/28/07, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/28/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Jouravlev wrote:
> > Paul, do you think that STR-3009 -- ActionRedirect from ForwardConfig
> > not redirecting properly -- should be fixed for 1.3.7 to minimize the
> > impact o
On 3/1/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We choose not to re-use a tag after a build has been released, where
"released" means the PMC has voted on the build. But, if it's still a
test-build, and it would be helpful to retag it for some reason, then
"no harm, no foul". I've been known to
On 2/28/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The list of issues for 1.3.7 look good. I can't find your PGP key, so
I'm unable to check the .asc file.
The src in the -all zip happily packages into jars.
Installing the apps into a Tomcat 5.5, I get the following error for
struts-faces-ex
On 2/22/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One thing I noticed in s1 is that there is no way to initialize a
command. I am not speaking about the public constructor, but a way for a
servlet-aware command to perform first-time initialization before its
execute() method gets invoked.
Wha
You should have now.
Niall
On 2/16/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can't assign to myself tickets I didn't report, or change the status of
the ones that I did report. karma?
regards
musachy
-
To unsubscribe,
On 2/14/07, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One thing that would help "clean up" the wiki guides
is to format it more like a book: sidebars really work
and are much less disruptive than a browser-width
highlighted section. I don't know if that's possible
with Confluence, but it sure could
I just prefixed the "Shared Resources" and "Sandbox" project names in
Jira with "Struts" - since we now also have "Tiles" and "Shale"
projects.
Niall
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [
Your message did get through to the list. Not sure what additional
light I can shed given what the comment regarding JavaScript already
says.
If you have a need then I'd suggest creating a Jira ticket - although
most peoples attention is focused on Struts 2.x now, so whether you
would find a volu
Please ask questions like this on the user list.
depends="extends" means that you have a validator defined in your
configuration called "extends" - so to find out what it does you look
at the class configured for that validator. In this case its probably
a small extension I wrote which is not par
I think just go ahead and create the branch. Tags/Branches in svn are
cheap and if anyone doesn't like it can always be re-done/reversed.
Niall
On 2/7/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to do this for the 1.x line as well. I want to push out a new
1.3.7 with a few tiny patche
Ted and I disagree on this - I don't believe the intention of that
policy is to make headers for source files optional. If you read the
whole policy document rather than focusing on a single word it seems
pretty clear to me that they are required. For example in the FAQ it
states the following abo
On 1/30/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, infrastructure prefers that all "releases" be mirrored, so I
expect that means the Maven equivalents should also be distributed via
the public repository.
Did we withhold 2.0.1 from the public repository?
And, there's no reason to believe t
I found a problem with Struts 1.3.6 in the LinkTag:
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2998
I was going to try and implement version 1.3.6 at work - but since it
makes every page in my app look strange (due to the syles being
applied to the link x2) - I can't and it makes this version
The problem with Struts1 is that its now a maven2 build and I don't
think gump yet supports maven2.
Niall
On 1/20/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
VelocityTools is getting a Gump failure because we recently upgraded
our Validator tool to use the
org.struts.validator.Resources.getVarV
On 1/10/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tiles2 is not in the parent pom for 1.3.6
OK, my mistake thats good.
Niall
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> IMO the Struts1 Tiles2 module should be excluded from the 1.3.6
> release since its dependant on the tiles sandbox SNAPSHOT
IMO the Struts1 Tiles2 module should be excluded from the 1.3.6
release since its dependant on the tiles sandbox SNAPSHOT which is now
the reponsibility of the new Tiles PMC. Since the Tiles PMC has not
released that code, I'm against having a dependency on it in the
Struts1 release.
On the issue
On 12/18/06, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to create a custom "CreateAction" command to be plugged in the
CoR RequestProcessor of Struts 1.3
This command will handle Spring autowiring of commands, but requires
initiali acces to the servletContext to get the Spring
On 12/10/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/7/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to release version 4 of the struts-master pom.
>
> The repository has been tagged:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/struts/maven/tags/STRUTS_MASTER_4
This vote passed with the following seven +1 votes (6 binding) and no
other votes:
Niall Pemberton
David DeWolf
Martin Cooper
Rainer Hermanns
Don Brown
Ted Husted
Wendy Smoak
Thanks to everyone - I'll get on an complete the master pom release
Niall
On 12/7/06, Niall Pemberton &l
I'd like to release version 4 of the struts-master pom.
The repository has been tagged:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/struts/maven/tags/STRUTS_MASTER_4/
Pom version 4 available for review here:
http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/STRUTS_MASTER_4/
This is the master pom from which struts-par
I'd like to release the struts master pom - struts1 is currently
depending on 4-SNAPSHOT which is a blocker to any possible release.
Niall
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE
On 12/6/06, David H. DeWolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I like it, sounds good! Does that mean we're done until approval?
When is the next board meeting? Any one know? How do we get this on
their agenda?
I asked Henri Yandell
The next board meeting is Wednesday 20th December and the reso
Struts1 may need to bugfix the existing tiles1 code and I don't
believe we should be hampered/prevented from doing this by the fact
that not all Struts committers are tiles committers.
Niall
Thanks,
Greg
On Dec 5, 2006, at 9:38 AM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> Niall Pemberton ha scritto:
>
On 12/5/06, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello!
I am now facing the problem of the integration of Tiles 2 with Struts 1,
there is a JIRA issue for this:
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SB-15
I wish to know from you if this integration must be put:
1. in Struts 1, replacing
On 12/4/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/3/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I compile, I get this from Maven:
>
> 8K downloaded
> [WARNING] *** CHECKSUM FAILED - Error retrieving checksum file for
> commons-validator/commons-validator/1.3.1/commons-validator-1.3
On 12/4/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When I compile, I get this from Maven:
8K downloaded
[WARNING] *** CHECKSUM FAILED - Error retrieving checksum file for
commons-validator/commons-validator/1.3.1/commons-validator-1.3.1.pom -
I don't see the checksum in the M2 Repo:
http://mi
On 11/28/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We have this site issue"
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2926
The complaint is we don't have any download links for Struts-Faces. Now
with the 1.3.5 release, struts-faces is part of the library. However,
that wasn't the case with
On 11/28/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/27/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 and we could make space by removing "Similar Projects" and having
> "Related Projects" which just contains Shale, Jakarta Commons,
> Velocity
On 11/28/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can successfully build the entire Struts 1.3.6 website from the parent
POM. This POM I have upgraded to the latest versions of the plug-ins (no
snapshots) and closed out most of the tickets that recommended build
enhancements. Specifically,
On 11/27/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
try {
proplist.add(new PropertyDescriptor("disabled",
ELTextTag.class,
null, "setDisabledExpr"));
} catch (IntrospectionException ex) {
}
For some reason, the ELFormTag is referenci
On 11/25/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The tag libraries are missing the standard "dir" and "lang" attributes.
While the html:html can output the locale from the Struts application,
there is no way to override the language and direction for individual
elements.
JIRA ticket:
https:
If tiles can achieve the critical mass to become a TLP then IMO that
would be the best solution - at this point it looks at least a couple
of devs short of that. In the meantime its question of "where can it
do its growing?". Commons makes less sense to me than staying here
since theres definetly
Please ask these types of questions on the user list.
http://struts.apache.org/mail.html
Thanks
Niall
On 11/24/06, Antony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi..
Please help me to configure the Appache Struts 2.0..
It has contained multiple Jar files. So.
If u know...Tel abt follow am menshione
Can you ask user questions on the user list please, this list is for
discussion about the development of Struts:
http://struts.apache.org/mail.html
thanks
Niall
On 11/23/06, Tracy12 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any html docs/help on deployments instructions?
Don Brown-2 wrote:
>
>
The javascript is part of Commons Validator - not Struts. If you
create an issue ticket against Commons Validator I'll take the the
html markup out of the javascript comments.
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/validator/issue-tracking.html
Niall
On 11/22/06, Neil Sherman/Trapsoft Inc <[EMAIL PR
1 - 100 of 554 matches
Mail list logo
