Kalle Korhonen: +1 (binding)
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 3:40 AM Dmitry Gusev wrote:
> Dmitry Gusev: +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:22 PM Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <
> thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo: +1 (binding)
> >
y and tapestry-security.
> We have customized versions of these libraries that we maintain
> internally since they were not being actively maintained at the time.
> Mostly dependency updates, bug fixes and migration of the builds to gradle.
>
> IIRC Kalle Korhonen has an active client u
Kalle Korhonen: +1 (binding)
Well done Thiago!
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 6:03 PM Massimo Lusetti wrote:
> Massimo Lusetti: +1 (binding)
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 4:10 PM Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <
> thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thiago H. de Paula Figueire
Kalle Korhonen: +1 (binding)
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 2:01 PM Bob Harner wrote:
> Bob Harner: +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020, 5:31 AM Ben Weidig wrote:
>
> > Ben Weidig: +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 2:08 AM Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo &
Kalle Korhonen: +1 (binding)
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:54 PM Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <
thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo: +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 7:21 PM Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <
> thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
Kalle Korhonen: +1 (binding)
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 3:22 PM Jochen Kemnade wrote:
> Jochen Kemnade: +1
>
> Am Mo., 26. Aug. 2019 um 15:29 Uhr schrieb Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <
> thiag...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hello, Apache Tapestry team!
> >
> > Dmitry
Kalle Korhonen: +1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Lance Java
wrote:
> Lance S. +1 (non-binding)
>
> On 10 Apr 2017 12:19, "Jochen Kemnade" wrote:
>
> > I've created and uploaded a release of Tapestry 5.4.2, ready to be voted
> >
Thanks, this is important work. Are you warming up your pages (i.e. by
contributing to PagePreloader) in production and do you know if it makes
any difference?
Kalle
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Michael Mikhulya
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to discuss one issue and idea how to fix it.
>
classpath that throws it off. I got the same problem until I did clean,
otherwise I claim there's nothing wrong. I don't have permissions to modify
the Travis build, was that Jochen who set it up?
Kalle
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
> Hmm it&#x
Hmm it's the :tapestry-core:testWithPrototype that's failing... looking.
Kalle
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Travis CI wrote:
> Build Update for apache/tapestry-5
> -
>
> Build: #125
> Status: Still Failing
>
> Duration: 14 minutes and 51 seconds
> Commit:
There are quite a few things in the master now that would be useful for me.
I was going to finish up what is assigned for me and create an issue for
upgrading Hibernate (5.2 is Java 8 only) but turns out I cannot create JIRA
issues anymore (I suppose because of the recent JIRA lockdown). Oh well,
I
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo <
thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2016 15:02:30 -0300, Kalle Korhonen <
> kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I just pushed a new JPA feature for T5.5, see
>>
>> htt
Somehow I left the issue number out from the title - it's TAP5-2553
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2553>.
Kalle
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
> I just pushed a new JPA feature for T5.5, see
> https://github.com/apache
I just pushed a new JPA feature for T5.5, see
https://github.com/apache/tapestry5/commit/5047220cfe9a6f8a640fb10f0e3de266af51630f.
There's one issue though - I had to add annotations to a test service
*interface* (UserDAO) to make one test, specifically
JpaIntegrationTestWithAnnotationsInServiceImp
To be more specific, tapestry-jpa-transactions'
TransactionalUnitJpaTransactionAdvisor should be a drop-in replacement for
T5's current JpaTransactionAdvisorImpl, many other parts of the JPA module
stay as is.
Kalle
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
> Hey al
Hey all,
just a heads-up, I'm planning on bringing in Satago Ltd's
tapestry-jpa-transactions into T5 core, which will replace the existing
tapestry-jpa implementation for T5.5. The code is already under Apache v2
license and I have a buy-in from all of the contributors (see
https://github.com/sata
PM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo <
thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:12:30 -0300, Kalle Korhonen <
> kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Now that 5.4.1 is out, it might be a good time to move ahead with this
>> plan, create a branch for 5.4.x
Now that 5.4.1 is out, it might be a good time to move ahead with this
plan, create a branch for 5.4.x and reserve the master for 5.5 development
with Java 8. I'm much more concerned with degradation of the test suite
(since the tests aren't being run until we can upgrade Selenium) than
merging/bac
Kalle Korhonen: +1 (non-binding)
Superb job Jochen!
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Andreas Ernst wrote:
> Andreas Ernst +1 non-binding
>
> Am 16.03.16 um 09:32 schrieb Jochen Kemnade:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> I've created and uploaded a release of Tapestry 5.4.1, read
ease tomorrow. I'd like to resolve TAP5-1803
> before, I'd appreciate some more feedback on the issue.
> Anything else that we should do for 5.4.1?
>
> Jochen
>
>
> Am 26.02.2016 um 17:25 schrieb Kalle Korhonen:
>
>> I'll second that. Making a Tapestry re
I'll second that. Making a Tapestry release is considerably more involving
and time consuming than cutting a Github release. Uli, if you think you can
easily implement a Jenkins release job that also makes the source
distribution available, please do so. Most of us don't have privileges to
Jenkins.
I'd like to get those JPA issues done I assigned to myself but don't hold
it up for them. I'm still working on something else before I can get to
those. What's your timeline?
Kalle
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:58 AM, Jochen Kemnade wrote:
> Sure, I do that on Github, but in ASF projects, a little
Your link doesn't work for me ("The requested filter doesn't exist or is
private.") but I'll pick up some of those, at least the JPA ones.
Kalle
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 6:52 AM, Jochen Kemnade
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anyone use any of those integrations? There are some open issues
> affecting thos
Having had the luxury of using Java 8 now for a few months in a new green
field project, I fully agree we should go for Java 8 in T5.5. At times,
this version of Java almost feels like a modern language ;) T5.4 is
perfectly fine alternative for those who are not ready to move onto Java 8
and in gen
It's supposed to publish code quality results to Apache's sonar instance
(as an example, see Wicket's results at
https://analysis.apache.org/dashboard/index/241313), but no, I don't think
we need it and we haven't kept it up to date.
Kalle
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 11:58 PM, Jochen Kemnade
wrote:
I like your plan actually. Generally, I'd like to make it better and easier
to use Tapestry as a REST backend (as related to the recent discussions on
the user list) but I really don't want to bring in another dependency and
in all honesty, most of the integrations to third-party libraries are much
Answering to myself, they are stored in Confluence. I say it looks like the
problem's caused by a space in the image filename because the fourth image
on the same page works ok. Trying it out. Sorry for hijacking the thread.
Kalle
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
nce and JIRA updates, is very welcome, see
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TAPESTRY/Release+Process
> for
> > > reference.
> > >
> > > Binding votes:
> > > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo: +1
> > > Massimo Lusetti: +1
> >
Kalle Korhonen: +1 (non-binding)
On Dec 15, 2015 1:50 PM, "françois facon" wrote:
> François Facon: +1 (non-binding)
>
> 2015-12-15 19:28 GMT+01:00 Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo <
> thiag...@gmail.com>
> :
>
> > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo: +1 (binding)
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Jochen Kemnade
wrote:
> Am 14.12.2015 um 15:07 schrieb Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo:
>
>> any thoughts on how we should continue?
>>> In my opinion there's nothing code-wise that's blocking the release.
>>>
>> +1
>>
> So, what do you suggest? Should we create a re
Kalle Korhonen: +1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Jochen Kemnade wrote:
> Jochen Kemnade: +1 (binding)
>
> Jochen Kemnade schrieb am Mo., 26. Okt. 2015 um
> 18:28 Uhr:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've created and uploaded a release of Tapestr
Great work Jochen! I think we should let the rc sink in for some time to
flush out any remaining issues. An RC will likely get more attention in the
community. I have a few documentation updates on my plate and I should have
a bit more time to allocate for it towards the end of the year.
Kalle
On
ring the weekend, I'll revert the commit.
>
> Jochen
>
>
> Am 13.10.2015 um 08:34 schrieb Jochen Kemnade:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 12.10.2015 um 22:40 schrieb Kalle Korhonen:
>>
>>> Hey Jochen & others, I'm still not positively clear on wha
like that's not going to happen now. Do you have
any more details about it?
Kalle
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
> Thanks. You can probably guess how I too found out about it. I'm inclined
> to side with Jochen on this, that it's a step backwards. Ho
s,
> Balazs
>
> On 27 August 2015 at 22:19, Kalle Korhonen
> wrote:
>
> > In 22bd2c14b3c7d91ebd97cbc264882552c12044f7 (since 5.4-beta-31), Howard
> had
> > changed the form control name to be based on component's simple id
> instead
> > of the compone
In 22bd2c14b3c7d91ebd97cbc264882552c12044f7 (since 5.4-beta-31), Howard had
changed the form control name to be based on component's simple id instead
of the component's client-side id. This change is not based on any open
issue, so I'm just trying to find the reason for the change?
Kalle
Kalle Korhonen: +1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:12 PM, françois facon wrote:
> François Facon: +1 (non binding)
>
> 2015-08-18 20:44 GMT+02:00 Dimitris Zenios :
>
> > +1 (non binding)
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Howard Lewis Ship
> &
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Jochen Kemnade
wrote:
> Am 04.08.2015 um 18:53 schrieb Kalle Korhonen:
>
>> The two tests failed for me on Monday were:
>>
>> Tapestry Core > Core Integration Tests >
>>
>> org.apache.tapestry5.integration.app1.ZoneTe
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Jochen Kemnade
wrote:
> Am 04.08.2015 um 05:29 schrieb Kalle Korhonen:
>
>> There's a few tests failing, at least for me,
>>
> Which one?
The two tests failed for me on Monday were:
Tapestry Core > Core Integration Tests >
org.a
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo <
thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jochen Kemnade: +0 (binding) (with a notice about TAP5-2397 and TAP5-2482
> to be closed before a final version)
> Is there any volunteer for getting this release done? :)
I could. I'll be traveling for
Thiago, can you close this vote. Looks like the only, non-blocking issue
raised was TAP5-2397. Looks like it's waiting for input from Howard.
Kalle
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Jochen Kemnade wrote:
> I just wanted to create a new beta release, but I'm getting test failures
> on my machine:
Kalle Korhonen: +1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo <
thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've fixed a couple of issues I considered showstoppers. 5.4 is long
> overdue, and if not perfect, nothing remaining (to my view) can&
Harner’s thoughts in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2485 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2485> might hold a clue.
>
> > On 10 Jul 2015, at 9:46 am, Kalle Korhonen
> wrote:
> >
> > Several users have left comments in the documentation that
Several users have left comments in the documentation that they don't see
the examples. At least one of the issues is that the contentbylabel macro
is giving an undescriptive error "BadRequestException: Could not parse cql
: null" (see e.g.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TAPESTRY/Overr
I believe we have a general consensus it's time for RC, so I think we
should just cut a release and vote on it.
Kalle
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> Feel free!
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo <
> thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On
Kalle Korhonen: +1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Bob Harner wrote:
> Bob Harner: +1 (non-binding)
> On Jun 2, 2015 2:46 PM, "françois facon" wrote:
>
> > François Facon : +1 (non binding)
> >
> > 2015-06-02 2:26 GMT+02:00 Howard Lewis Ship :
See what Sally is asking below. Howard, you indicated in the board report
that you are starting to feel pretty good about T5.4. Do we think we are
ready for a GA release by ApacheCon? It might get us some free publicity.
Kalle
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:35 AM, Sally Khudairi wrote:
> Hi folks -
Why is the latest build building and *installing* a .war to Maven repo for
tapestry-core? Seems bizarre. Does this somehow happen on my machine only?
Earlier, builds have been just fine.
Kalle
Kalle Korhonen: +1 (non-binding). Absolutely, well deserved! (and hope we
can grant JIRA permissions to him as well)
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Bob Harner wrote:
> Bob Harner: +1 (nonbinding)
> On Feb 26, 2015 7:38 PM, "Howard Lewis Ship" wrote:
>
> > If you have
There is and it's in use. See below and the release notes for 5.3.8 at
http://tapestry.apache.org/release-notes-538.html, it won't run on JRE 1.8
unless you explicitly require a newer javassist version. On a related note,
we've walked the JRE 1.5 path as far as we can go. JRE 1.5 compatible
version
Kalle Korhonen: +1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Bob Harner wrote:
> Bob Harner: +1 (nonbinding)
> On Jan 7, 2015 4:58 PM, "Howard Lewis Ship" wrote:
>
> > Howard M. Lewis Ship: +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Dimitris
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> :uploadArtifacts FAILED
> FAILURE: Build failed with an exception.
> * Where:
> Script '/Users/hlship/workspaces/tapestry/tapestry5/ssh.gradle' line: 63
> * What went wrong:
> Execution failed for task ':uploadArtifacts'.
> > com.jcraft.
Thanks Bob for updating the DOAP file. If you had permissions to update
that one you should be able to update archetype-catalog.xml. But wait, I
thought this is for PMC members only? If not, I'd prefer to have the
permissions to update it myself for the next time.
Updating the catalog and the cwik
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Jochen Kemnade
wrote:
> Am 06.11.2014 um 10:53 schrieb Jochen Kemnade:
>
>> Am 15.10.2014 um 17:12 schrieb Jochen Kemnade:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> can somebody with the appropriate permissions please close the 5.3.7
>>> release in JIRA [1]?
>>>
>>
>> Pretty please? :-)
I wanted to get this release out of the way but looks to me we are building
artificial bottlenecks.
Kalle
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Howard Lewis Ship
wrote:
> I'll look into it tomorrow.
>
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Kalle Korhonen <
> kalle.o.korho..
at 4:35 PM, Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
> Thanks Howard. Same thing for archetype-catalog.xml - I don't have
> permissions to update it.
>
> Kalle
>
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Howard Lewis Ship
> wrote:
>
>> Or, apparently, almost immediately available!
>&
; On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Howard Lewis Ship
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'm just back from a few days in D.C., the Clojure/conj conference.
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Howard Lewis Ship
> >>> wrote
Yes, think you did:
https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/committer_shell_access_to_people. So
did I while I was making the 5.3.8 release but it's easy to add your key to
the set of authorized keys using id.apache.org.
Kalle
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Howard Lewis Ship
wrote:
> So did I m
documentation). Oh well, it was a good try. If someone
wants to help, the release is in my
/home/kaosko/public_html/tapestry-releases but I cannot move those files.
Kalle
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
> Yes, but no permissions. It's all owned by svnpubsub user:
old" way (using SSH to upload it to the project's download
> directory)?
> On Nov 24, 2014 12:53 AM, "Kalle Korhonen"
> wrote:
>
> > I'm not able to commit to
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tapestry/ as described at
> >
t;new" as all of the current ones have
still been distributed by simply copying them over (based on the svn log).
Anyone know what to do? Maven bits are already released.
Kalle
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
> Vote closed and succeeded with the following tally:
+1 (non-binding)
> On Nov 20, 2014 2:21 PM, "Kalle Korhonen"
> wrote:
>
> > I've created and uploaded a release of Tapestry 5.3.8, ready to be voted
> > upon.
> >
> > The source and source downloads are uploaded to:
> > http://people.apache.
vote, I'll release the Maven
artifacts, and move the source and javadoc distributions from these
directories
to the proper distribution directories and update the Tapestry site
documentation, and send out appropriate notifications.
Kalle Korhonen: +1 (non-binding)
What do you know, fixed the build issue on the first. Now proceeding with
T5.3.8 release vote.
Kalle
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Jochen Kemnade > wrote:
>
>> Am 20.11.2014 um 17:10 schrieb Kalle Korhonen:
>>
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Jochen Kemnade
wrote:
> Am 20.11.2014 um 17:10 schrieb Kalle Korhonen:
>
>> Will try gradlew. mavenLocal() was absolutely not by accident and I tried
>>
>
Same error with gradlew (gradle 1.0).
> to highlight the reason for it in
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Jochen Kemnade
wrote:
> Am 20.11.2014 um 05:40 schrieb Kalle Korhonen:
>
>> So I made an attempt at cutting a 5.3.8 release
>>
>
> Great, thanks for volunteering. :-)
> Have you tried to run the build with gradlew?
> By the
So I made an attempt at cutting a 5.3.8 release and after fixing various
errors for JDK 1.5 compatibility (I feel like an archeologist) the
generateRelease target fails with:
---
Converting class
org.gradle.api.internal.artifacts.publish.ArchivePublishArtifact to File
using toString() method has b
t time it worked well, so I assume that
> >> > either the export is blocked from connecting to Confluence or the
> >> > version of Confluence changed in some incompatible way.
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Ulrich Stärk
> wrote:
Uli, you know anything more?
Kalle
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> 4 days ... no response.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Howard Lewis Ship
> Date: Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:01 AM
> Subject: Tapestry buildbot (site updates from Conflu
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:37 AM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo <
thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:18:38 -0300, Kalle Korhonen <
> kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Perhaps best to give Jochen rights to admin the jira or whatever is needed
>>
Perhaps best to give Jochen rights to admin the jira or whatever is needed
to manage versions, don't you think? (I can't do anything, I don't have any
rights.)
Kalle
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Jochen Kemnade
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can somebody with the appropriate permissions please close the 5
I don't think we have made any changes to the schema since 5.3.
Kalle
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Andreas Ernst wrote:
> Not Found
>
> The requested URL /schema/tapestry_5_4.xsd was not found on this server.
> Apache/2.4.10 (Unix) OpenSSL/1.0.1i Server at tapestry.apache.org Port 80
>
> Is
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo <
thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:21:34 -0300, Dimitris Zenios <
> dimitris.zen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Git mv
>>
> Thanks!
> Do you guys think this change should have a vote before it's done?
No reason to vote y
Kalle Korhonen: +1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Jochen Kemnade
wrote:
> Am 02.10.2014 um 16:25 schrieb Howard Lewis Ship:
>
>> Since the last vote was actually a fail (not enough binding +1 votes),
>> let's do a re-vote to make it official that beta-
can make plans.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Geoff
> >>
> >> On 25 Sep 2014, at 5:00 pm, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
> >>
> >>> That's great!
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Kalle Korhonen <
&
-5.git;a=commit;h=4bc52d876ba64d5843bb9661187a9fdabffe2b33
> >>
> >> Vote will run for three days; On a successful vote, I'll release the
> Maven
> >> artifacts, and move the source and javadoc distributions from these
> >> directories
> >> to the prope
Kalle Korhonen: +1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Jochen Kemnade wrote:
> Yes, you're right, we can do another beta every time we like, I just have a
> slightly bad feeling about releasing a *public* beta that we know has a bug
> that we already have a fix fo
Kalle Korhonen: +1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo <
thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo: +1 (binding)
>
> --
> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
> Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer
&g
Right, that's the principle but not a strict requirement. I don't want us
to get stuck with procedural issues. Voting is supposed to help us with
coding, not prevent it. We don't vote on all code changes and in this case,
we wanted to ask the community's opinion and it looks we have it. We can go
b
To get on with this, Jochen please change your vote to binding and close
the vote as successful. We don't want to be paralyzed by non-voting when
there are no votes against.
Kalle
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> Howard M. Lewis Ship: +1 (binding)
>
>
> On Wed, May 2
Can other PMC members please weigh in here. Jochen, no reason to close the
vote till you have a binding majority decision either way.
Kalle
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 6:11 AM, Kristian Marinkovic <
kristian.marinko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kristian Mairnkovic: +1 (non-binding)
>
> i don't see any re
JMHO, maintaining backwards compatibility in this case isn't worth the
added complexity. Making support libraries compatible requires just
compiling them against the new version and there are many other, more
drastic changes in 5.4 that require at least a re-compilation and in many
cases, changes i
Kalle Korhonen: +1 (non-binding)
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Jochen Kemnade wrote:
> There have been discussions whether we want to keep compatibility with
> Java 5 for the upcoming 5.4 release.
> Java 5 is EOSL since October 2009.
> While requiring Java 6 would not bring us m
Kalle Korhonen: +1 (non-binding)
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> I've created and uploaded a release of Tapestry 5.4-beta-6, ready to be
> voted upon.
>
> The source and source downloads are uploaded to:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~h
er closure
compiler".
Kalle
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Jochen Kemnade
wrote:
> Any new insights on this one? The current master will still FTBFS on Java
> 5.
>
> Am 02.05.2014 18:18, schrieb Kalle Korhonen:
>
> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 12:57 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
&
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 12:57 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> I don't see the benefits in this. As I said earlier, Java 6 and 7 IMO
> don't provide enough benefits
> to justify the change.
>
A newer Java version is required if we want to update the closure compiler.
Kalle
On 2
I agree with Rob. A common sense approach would be to require 1.6 for T5.4
and then require 1.8 in a future version.
Kalle
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Robert Zeigler
wrote:
> Not opposed to an upgrade to Java 8, but not sure 5.4 is the right time
> for it. 5.4 has been long-enough in coming
ass first (it has a
corresponding, non-static public operation).
Kalle
> On Saturday, March 22, 2014, Kalle Korhonen
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Bob Harner >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > True, but that particular visibility change will need to
-upon tag, e.g.
> "found-in-5.4-beta".
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Kalle Korhonen <
> kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Related to TAP5-2214, should we create a new 5.4.0 version in JIRA (who's
> > got the karma?) o
Related to TAP5-2214, should we create a new 5.4.0 version in JIRA (who's
got the karma?) or what's the plan for setting "fix version" for defects
found in 5.4 beta release?
Kalle
n Mar 22, 2014 11:13 AM, "Kalle Korhonen"
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Bob Harner wrote:
> >
> > > Kalle,
> > > I guess there would be another step?
> > > 7) "Also made a single change
> > > to ASM source, pr
tantiate
> AnnotationNode)" ... Or is that what you meant by step 6?
>
Yes, that's what's included in the step 6. Really, we can't describe exact
steps to incorporate codebase with unknown future changes.
Kalle
> On Mar 21, 2014 12:40 PM, "Kalle Korhonen"
&
alculation may
differ.
Kalle
> On 21 Mar 2014 16:40, "Kalle Korhonen" wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:57 AM, Bob Harner wrote:
> >
> > > Kalle, can you list the steps you went through to do this? I'd like to
> > > document the process, sinc
tic.asm"
5) use the IDE to rename the "org.objectweb.asm" package to
"org.apache.tapestry5.internal.plastic.asm"
6) fix compilation errors
Naturally, your IDE needs to be smart enough to refactor the package names
in the class files accordingly.
Kalle
> On Mar 20, 20
Sure, no problem. We still need it released but that might have to wait
till 5.4 GA release. Easy enough for those who need it to build it
themselves though.
Kalle
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Joachim Van der Auwera wrote:
> THanks Kalle for doing this.
>
> Kind regards,
> Joachim
>
>
> On
Kalle Korhonen: +1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 8:19 AM, françois facon wrote:
> François Facon: +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> 2014-02-20 9:52 GMT+01:00 Massimo Lusetti :
>
> > Massimo Lusetti: +1 (binding)
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 a
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo <
thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ulrich Stärk commented on TAP5-2214:
>>
>>
>> Ah, I see. Howard, is there a reason why we do not have an external
>> dependency on asm but are instead copying it into o
tware
> grant from Worldline.
>
> If no objection, I will committer this module next year.
>
>
> 2013/12/29 Kalle Korhonen
>
> > Hey François, what happened to this effort?
> >
> > Kalle
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Ulrich
260: Add support for CDI
> >
> > I think I will hold off one generating a beta-1 release until this is
> resolved.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:00 PM, François Facon <
> francois.fa...@atos.net>wrote:
> >
> >> Thank you, Kalle,
entral Maven repository.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Kalle Korhonen
> wrote:
>
> > Sure, I remember it well and I agree the light-overhead staging release
> > process has worked well for the alphas. However, it's up to us to decide
> > when to mak
1 - 100 of 381 matches
Mail list logo
