Re: TomEE MicroProfile Dist with Config

2018-03-06 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
but with other key names for jar name prefixes ( openejb.scan.webapp.container.includes and openejb.scan.webapp.container.excludes?). Default can use geronimo-* if we ensure all default g-* are excluded except mp ones (what you started in exclusions.list). Hope it makes sense Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau

Re: Rulerewrite is not working in TomEE

2018-03-06 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi, this works on tomee 7.0.4 (note your comet valve is not provided in tomee so you have to remove it to deploy your application I think) ensure you put rewrite.config in WEB-INF and context.xml in META-INF of the war maybe. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibu

Re: MP-JWT progress

2018-03-06 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
2018-03-06 10:24 GMT+01:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro : > Hi community, > > > So we now have something close in terms of MP-JWT implementation. > > With the playground branch I've been working on (Thanks Romain for the > help), we now pass 100% of the TCK (including a missing

Re: ASM 6 in Master and 1.7.x

2018-03-06 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
+1, thanks Jon. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in

Re: TomEE MicroProfile Dist with Config

2018-03-06 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
with TomEE8. > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > Am 06.03.2018 um 08:30 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > >: > > > > 2018-03-06 8:22 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>: > > > >> Did we already sol

Re: TomEE MicroProfile Dist with Config

2018-03-05 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
can (now, agree we need to ensure it is still the case but ATM we dont need buildchain to do it). > > Lg strub > > Mit autocorrect gesendet > > > Am 05.03.2018 um 22:31 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > >: > > > > Le 5 mars 20

Re: TomEE MicroProfile Dist with Config

2018-03-05 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Le 5 mars 2018 22:07, "Jonathan Gallimore" <jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> a écrit : On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 9:03 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Le 5 mars 2018 21:35, "Jonathan Gallimore" <jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> &

Re: TomEE MicroProfile Dist with Config

2018-03-05 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
dled as a fatjar - and gained like 5M on somzthing like 30M with a way less tested bundle at the end and more risk to add libs unproperly so previous proposal is saner IMHO. Jon On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 5:09 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2018-

Re: TomEE MicroProfile Dist with Config

2018-03-05 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
2018-03-05 18:02 GMT+01:00 Roberto Cortez : > > I'll check Jon. > Regarding profiles, my idea about a MP build was to also allow us to have > a minimal binary with just the MP stuff. This mean removing specs that are > not part of MP specs, like JPA. I guess this

Re: TomEE MicroProfile Dist with Config

2018-03-05 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
can throw a vote on that, would also allow to drop the overlay module BTW ;). Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc

Re: TomEE MicroProfile Dist with Config

2018-03-05 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
our assemblies instead of copying 4 times the assembly.xml and attach hack? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc

Re: [DISCUSS] switching TomEE8 to master

2018-03-04 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
@Mark: it is tracked on johnzon ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/JOHNZON-149). There was the proposal I did months ago to just use jsonp/b 1.1/1.0 in tomee 7 (doesnt prevent anything from tomee perspective if we drop java 7 compat). If not desired we should redo 1.x

Re: [DISCUSS] switching TomEE8 to master

2018-03-02 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
sounds perfect for me (thanks Jon, can help to review issues if needed) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc

Re: [DISCUSS] switching TomEE8 to master

2018-03-02 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
@Mark: was just what you said in "sync tomee8 branch" thread Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |

Re: [DISCUSS] switching TomEE8 to master

2018-03-02 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Did we plan to do the 7.0.5 then switch? +1 for this, +0 to switch before (for that reason) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g

Re: TomEE and MicroProfile

2018-02-28 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
since they make the spec unusable so we will probably need to own the spec anyway as we already started. > > Andy. > > > > On 27/02/18 16:02, Roberto Cortez wrote: > >> Thanks Romain, >> I'll have a look into JL work. >> Cheers,RobertoOn Tuesday, February 27,

Re: "Umbrella" discussion

2018-02-27 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Agree, there is no reason the relationship changes today and TomEE can continue to benefit from its server image and consume all the goodness coming from the brand new geronimo status/state without impacting/disturbing its own community. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.

Re: TomEE and MicroProfile

2018-02-22 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
ctivities on the list. > > CheersGurkan > > On Thursday, February 22, 2018, 11:38:02 AM GMT+3, Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2018-02-22 9:35 GMT+01:00 Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com. > invalid>: > > > &g

Re: ConnectionPoolTimeoutException when accessing the remote beans.

2018-02-22 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
yes -D in setenv.bat (for win) the last name you mention must work Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc

Re: TomEE and MicroProfile

2018-02-22 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
B, etc -> use TomEE > After all the same (active!) people are involved in most of those projects > anyway. > LieGrue,strub > On Thursday, 22 February 2018, 07:54:27 CET, Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Gurkan, > > All has cl

Re: TomEE and MicroProfile

2018-02-22 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
mock)* if you need XA, > JAX-WS, > > EJB, etc -> use TomEE > > After all the same (active!) people are involved in most of those > projects > > anyway. > > LieGrue,strub > > On Thursday, 22 February 2018, 07:54:27 CET, Romain Manni-Bucau < > &

Re: ConnectionPoolTimeoutException when accessing the remote beans.

2018-02-22 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
if 7.0.2 was synch-ing both early enough. Also which client connection config do you use? plain ejbd? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g

Re: TomEE and MicroProfile

2018-02-21 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
g to TomEE. Lots of users are confused with this https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9d6058ba109f27cd74c29cd93bebfc e29160145723407e203e43d145@%3Cdev.openwebbeans.apache.org%3E CheersGurkan On Thursday, February 22, 2018, 12:41:19 AM GMT+3, Romain Manni-Bucau < rmannibu...@gmail.com&g

Re: TomEE and MicroProfile

2018-02-21 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Le 21 févr. 2018 22:33, "Bruno Baptista" a écrit : Hi All, Is it a given that in the future we will use on TomEE both: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-config https://github.com/apache/geronimo-safeguard Can we assume that from now on? In the MP distro probably yes.

Re: TomEE and MicroProfile

2018-02-21 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
7 support is 96% compliant, > our Java EE 8 support is much further off. > > Thoughts? > > > -- > David Blevins > http://twitter.com/dblevins > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Feb 21, 2018, at 2:57 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > &g

Re: TomEE and MicroProfile

2018-02-21 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Yep, working on tomez8 is the safer way ATM. Now MP will only increase tomee size and not slim things down since trimming tomee is quickly stopped if you start from the web profile cause all is deeply integrated in configfactory, assembler and builders classes ATM. Not a blocker but dont get

Re: TomEE-8.0.0-SNAPSHOT green and deployed

2018-02-19 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Le 19 févr. 2018 12:47, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : Hi Jon! No, think there is none yet. Did all the build on my MBP and my Linux box. They are now both all green (running all tests except Multicast which fails due to firefall respective SElinux).As documented here:

Re: surefire nofork

2018-02-17 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Was for a temp test IIRC, feel free to revert Le 17 févr. 2018 15:00, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : > Hi! > Just figured master uses false > That is usually an indicator that we do not properly isolate between tests > or do not properly clean up. Which is not that

Re: TomEE8 TCK status

2018-02-15 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
> the > > >> tomee8_fb branch, and I'm making sure it builds and tests pass etc, > > before > > >> pushing. > > >> > > >> Jon > > >> > > >> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 5:19 PM, Mark Struberg > > <strub...@yahoo.de.

Re: TomEE8 TCK status

2018-02-15 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
and probably switch the branch. master doesnt get much activity and in any case all the activity it gets can be done on the 8 branch Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibuca

Re: Revert ActiveMQ version change (was Re: tomee git commit: upgrating amq from 5.14.5 to 5.15.2)

2018-02-15 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
sounds good to me Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in

Re: Revert ActiveMQ version change (was Re: tomee git commit: upgrating amq from 5.14.5 to 5.15.2)

2018-02-15 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Do we want to vote to move tomee7 to java 8? There is no more blocker today I think. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rm

Re: Implementing Microprofile JWT

2018-02-15 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
there is a challenge to be honest, just a clean definition without any redefinition of what is a "context" works :). > > regards > Rudy > > > On 15 February 2018 at 09:37, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> > wrote: > > > > > > > &

Re: Implementing Microprofile JWT

2018-02-14 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Le 15 févr. 2018 01:35, "David Blevins" a écrit : I understand there's kind of a meta conversation going on that all roads and discussions need to end at there being something to put a microprofile-jwt git repo. I wave a white flag and gently request a respite from that

Re: TomEE8 TCK status

2018-02-14 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
uff in the > Servlet spec. > > > > We could easily also send a specific CDI event for it. But there is no > such event in the CDI spec so far. > > The @Destryoed and @BeforeDestroyed are specifically for _destroyal_. > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > >

Re: Implementing Microprofile JWT

2018-02-14 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Le 14 févr. 2018 19:47, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit : > On Feb 14, 2018, at 9:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > interesting thing is JsonWebToken principal will not work with CDI by > design - due to proxies - s

Re: Implementing Microprofile JWT

2018-02-14 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
- so must use another unwrapped layer to get the principal like jaspic or servlet layers which will not require any change in any of our internals but more a better integration of existing techno, no? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog

Re: Implementing Microprofile JWT

2018-02-13 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:43 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > On 2018/02/12 20:42:58, Jonathan Gallimore <jonathan.gal

Re: Implementing Microprofile JWT

2018-02-13 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
2018-02-13 12:43 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > > > On 2018/02/12 20:42:58, Jonathan Gallimore <jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 8:20 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com> >

Re: [RESULT] Accept Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

2018-02-13 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
= no need to go through headaches IMHO. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin

Re: [RESULT] Accept Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

2018-02-13 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
and a commit done by a tomitribe member are enough in general. In other words: let just that happen :) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g

Re: [RESULT] Accept Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

2018-02-13 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
I miss? Side note: agree to put them on the same website for now, probably a subspace to not mix EE/Server/RAR stuff but as TomEE we have a single entry point which is tomee.apache.org. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.met

Re: Fwd: [2/4] tomee git commit: Preparation for Microprofile

2018-02-12 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
rts are >> reusable components, and which parts are just working in TomEE. >> LieGrue,strub >> >> On Monday, 12 February 2018, 19:39:24 CET, Romain Manni-Bucau < >> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi >> >> Is it a commit/push error? Disc

Re: Implementing Microprofile JWT

2018-02-12 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
eronimo package name to ease >> >>> backward compatibility. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>> Am 02.02.2018 um 11:08 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < >> >> rmannibu...@gmail.com <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com> >> >>>> : >>

Re: TomEE8 TCK status

2018-02-08 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
be used as a workaround I think it is fine to challenge them now. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn &

Re: TomEE8 TCK status

2018-02-08 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
ethodRemoteBusinessMethodTest>Arquillian.arquillianBeforeClass:109 > » Runtime > >>>> [ERROR] > >>>> EJBObserverMethodRemoteBusinessMethodTest>Arquillian.arquillianBeforeClass:109 > » Runtime > >>>> [ERROR] ObserverMethodInvocationCo

Re: TomEE Plume 7.0.3 JSP Compilation error due to exceeding the 65535 bytes limit

2018-02-07 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi did you try to set mappedfile and smapfile = false, trimSpaces=true in the jsp init params? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g

Re: [RESULT] Accept Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

2018-02-05 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
http://www.tomitribe.com > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 2:35 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > just plain new git repos IMHO > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >

Re: [RESULT] Accept Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

2018-02-05 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
just plain new git repos IMHO Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in

Re: sync tomee8 branch

2018-02-02 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
No hurry, we still have some days or maybe weeks before it is time but I got worried by the diff which is quite huge now. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com&g

Re: Implementing Microprofile JWT

2018-02-02 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi JL, Microprofile apache effort is hosted in geronimo and John already spoke about it I think. Would probably saner to keep it all at the same place for the foundation. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/>

sync tomee8 branch

2018-02-02 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi guys a few PR have been merged on master recently, can I ask some help to sync it in the fb_tomee8 branch please? Once done we'll be able to speak about "reversing" the branches hopefully. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>

Re: TomEE8 TCK status

2018-02-01 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
upgrade (which should be trivial as well). Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedi

Re: TomEE8 TCK status

2018-01-31 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
>From memory, until you need jsf or advanced web stuff all should run in embedded mode. That said we can need to tune jaas to match the expectations of the tcks. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> |

Re: TomEE8 TCK status

2018-01-31 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
mment somewhere for future specs if needed but not for existing one IMHO. > > I'm tempted to go 1. > But of course I'm happy if someone finds a bit time to fix the generator > setup. > David, you did this initially. Is it worth it and can you free up some > time for it? > > > LieGrue, > s

Re: TomEE8 TCK status

2018-01-31 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
/container/openejb-core/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/config/ReadDescriptors.java#L681 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rm

Re: [1/2] tomee git commit: No fork

2018-01-27 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
I > will > > revert. > > > > Jon > > > > On 26 Jan 2018 10:15, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Hi Jon, > >> > >> It is important we work reusing fork otherwise we start a containe

Re: [1/2] tomee git commit: No fork

2018-01-26 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi Jon, It is important we work reusing fork otherwise we start a container per test which makes it practically unusable. What's the issue here and why would we need this workaround? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.met

Re: Issue with TomEE startup

2018-01-23 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
If you put the remote API in both modules - and impl only in the ear where it is deployed - you should be able to load it properly. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpres

Re: Issue with TomEE startup

2018-01-23 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
2018-01-23 12:50 GMT+01:00 Dignesh : > Hi Romain, > > when i add it in the META-INF of ear it is working fine. > I added it in below format in jars.txt file > yes ear (WEB-INF for a war not in an ear) > > C:\dignesh\*.jar > > Still i am getting the below error > >

Re: Issue with TomEE startup

2018-01-23 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
2018-01-23 8:36 GMT+01:00 Dignesh : > Yes , I am doing a lookup of non remote bean. I can make it remote. > > I am unclear on the below statement. Can you please elaborate more ? > Alternatives are to use jars.txt or the system property to scan the > container > > can you

Re: Issue with TomEE startup

2018-01-22 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Do you do a global lookup of a not remote bean in the other ear? This doesnt work. Alternatives are to use jars.txt or the system property to scan the container but I would recommand you to sanitize your ears to comply to the spec. Le 23 janv. 2018 07:43, "Dignesh" a écrit

Re: Issue with TomEE startup

2018-01-22 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Yes, common.loader if both dont use EE features. Le 23 janv. 2018 07:06, "Dignesh" a écrit : > is there any way we can share lib between two ears ? > perhaps something like shared.loader or common.loader properties in > catalina.properties file ? > > > > -- > Sent from:

Re: Improves MDB performance with instance pool

2018-01-22 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
gt;>>>> >>>>> The mdb container is using the default pool 10 instances limit. The >>>>> stateless container has a `MaxSize` property where the user sets the >> max >>>>> number of instances the pool can hold at one time. The mdb container >>>

Re: Issue with TomEE startup

2018-01-22 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi Dignesh, Ears are isolated so if you want to use a lib of ear a in ear b you need to ensure it is in b libs. Le 23 janv. 2018 04:50, "Dignesh" a écrit : Hi, I am using 7.0.2 version of TomEE. I have 2 ears , a.ear and b.ear. Below is how modified my tomee.xml to

Re: anyone fixing the build?

2018-01-19 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Thanks Jon! Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau&g

anyone fixing the build?

2018-01-19 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
r at least - if ambiguous, it is fine for me to be red if somebody works on fixing it, it is not if we stay like that ;)? Thanks, Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com>

Re: revert activemq upgrade

2017-12-29 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Thanks Jon :)! Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau&g

revert activemq upgrade

2017-12-29 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi guys, Can we short term revert the activemq upgrade since the used version doesn't support java 7 please? (if someones wants to start a thread to pass tomee 7 to java 8 as a minimum I'm +1 on that but short term a working build and CI would be good) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <ht

Re: Improves MDB performance with instance pool

2017-12-27 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi Otavio and Ivan I like the fact to extract the instance management from the container - never made sense for me to reimplement it each time. However I'd like to go further and make the instance manager a resource reference in the config we can - and avoid boolean/string config like

Re: Upgrade HSQLDB to fix regression on 2.3.2

2017-12-14 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
master is fine I think Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannib

Re: Upgrade HSQLDB to fix regression on 2.3.2

2017-12-14 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi Thibaud, yes a PR is fine. Please respect the java 7 constraint on master (but tomee 8 branch can use a java 8 lib) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com&g

Re: Application InstanceManager is null causing crash with RestEasy Provider

2017-12-13 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Did you try with the tomcat version compatible of tomee (8.5)? Le 13 déc. 2017 19:25, "awmurray" a écrit : > I've been debugging a startup error deploying a WAR in an EAR. > > After downloading the source and debugging, I can see that the Instance > Manager is null

Re: tomee git commit: style

2017-12-06 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Buildbot is there for that ;) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-12-06 14:59 GMT+01:00 Jonathan Gallimore <jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>: > Thanks and apologies for not catching these. > > Jon > > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 1:40 PM, &l

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

2017-11-26 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
guess taglib community will have a more relevant feedback but that's what I had in mind at least, yes avoiding it in tomee means either removing the libs or deactivating the auto registration but none of these solutions are really stable and reliable on the long term. Romain Manni-Bucau

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

2017-11-25 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
tomcat doesnt, taglib does implicitly you can try to hack openejb.classloader properties to make it work - without any guarantees Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-25 17:26 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk>: > do

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

2017-11-21 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
depends the perfs. If javax gives the same no need of xalan, otherwise we would need some flag. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-21 11:52 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk>: > should xalan be available through s

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

2017-11-21 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
yes, that's the ones to fix - make it compiling + validate perfs are still ok. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-21 11:25 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk>: > it is imported in these ones in main as well as load

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

2017-11-21 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
No, you see this stack cause the test cant be loaded but it is in several classes of taglib project, XalanUtil and a few others. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-21 11:14 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk>: > so

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

2017-11-21 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
That's the one, org.apache.xpath is provided by xalan (don't ask me why xalan is not in the name ;)) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-21 10:57 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk>: > mvn instal

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

2017-11-21 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
be the way to go I think. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-21 10:27 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk>: > hi rmannibucau, > i tried to contact you by IRC about this. i am ready to continue after a > busy period

Re: Kill JVM on deployment failure

2017-11-08 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi Thiago To test it I would create a fake tomee - min libs used by the remoteserver, in target/mytest/faketomee and create a plain junit test and a nested main class using remote server that the unit test will launch through a fork. Then you just need to check the exit code of your fork

Re: LinkageError with tomee

2017-11-06 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi is it in an ear? any easy way to reproduce it? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-06 16:32 GMT+01:00 gabrielHneini <gabriel.hne...@globepayroll.com>: > Hello all, > > I am having a problem with my web application, on starting

Re: XmlJavaTypeAdapter not working

2017-11-02 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi is User part of a webservice signature or referenced through a @XmlSeeAlso? If not then it is not passed to the JAXBContext creation. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-02 15:15 GMT+01:00 Alinezhad.a <alinezha...@outlook.com>: > Hi &g

Re: Github question

2017-10-28 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi Alex Just do a normal github PR: http://tomee.apache.org/community/sources.html Le 28 oct. 2017 04:02, "Alex Gout" a écrit : > Hi guys, > > I just picked up and finished a JIRA. However, I got lost a bit in the > documentation on how to continue now. Should I follow >

Re: Issue when performing the ejb look up

2017-10-27 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hmm, looks good, do you have some ssl or ejbd system properties? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-10-27 7:46 GMT+02:00 Dignesh <dgo...@opentext.com>: > Yes. > Below are the contents > > server = org.apache.openejb.server.ejb

Re: Issue when performing the ejb look up

2017-10-26 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi Dignesh Do you have an ejbd.properties in conf/conf.d? Le 27 oct. 2017 07:19, "Dignesh" a écrit : > Hi, > I am using 7.0.2 version of TomEE. When performing the lookup using the > multicast .I am seeing the below exception > >

Re: "How to test latest TomEE 7.0.5 snapshots (w or without Arquilian) ?"

2017-10-11 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
git clone https://github.com/apache/tomee.git Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-10-11 11:34 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com>: > Okay so how do I get access to latest TomEE 7.0.5 sources? > > Alexandre > > > >

Re: "How to test latest TomEE 7.0.5 snapshots (w or without Arquilian) ?"

2017-10-11 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi Alex, this command was for tomee source directory, sources (master) look good so can be a deployment thing, building locally will say us quickly Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-10-11 10:38 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com>: &

Re: "How to test latest TomEE 7.0.5 snapshots (w or without Arquilian) ?"

2017-10-11 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
doesn't look so on master, maybe give a quick try to build locally (mvn clean install -DskipTests -T4 -pl tomee/tomee-embedded -am) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-10-11 10:25 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com>: > Hello Roma

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

2017-10-11 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/Version.java:21: > * [lifted from xalan] > ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:100: xalan > ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:101: xalan > ./standard/README_bin.txt:36: - xalan-2.7.1.jar > ./standard/README_bin.txt:47: - xalan-2.7.1.jar > ./standard/standard-test/p

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

2017-10-10 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Yes Le 10 oct. 2017 21:21, "Matthew Broadhead" <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> a écrit : > ok i cloned and built. but what am i supposed to do? remove all xalan > refs? > > On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > >> If I'm not mista

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

2017-10-10 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g

Re: "How to test latest TomEE 7.0.5 snapshots (w or without Arquilian) ?"

2017-10-10 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
small typo: actual snapshot repo is repository.apache.org/snapshots/, not central Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rm

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

2017-10-10 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;) Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead" <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> a écrit : > is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude other versions > of xalan from the pom but it didn't work > > On 10/10/20

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

2017-10-10 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
apshot, let us know and I can deploy one manually. >>>> >>>> Jon >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead < >>>> matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote: >>>> >>>> are the dist builds still at

Re: "How to test latest TomEE 7.0.5 snapshots (w or without Arquilian) ?"

2017-10-10 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Think you need asf snapshot repo @Jon: did you get a chance to check why our daily deployment fails? Le 10 oct. 2017 13:45, "Jonathan Gallimore" a écrit : > Good shout. Let me deploy the latest snapshot for you. Then you should just > need to use 7.0.5-SNAPSHOT as

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

2017-10-08 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/ (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibuca

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

2017-10-08 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi Alex, you can set as system property (through surefire) openejb.deployer.repository= Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

2017-10-08 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
@Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/ content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github &

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >