please restrict such broad definitions in CSS with an additional class (or even
better, ID) in order to have minimal impact on plugins and other pages. That
also means that we should watch out for that in future code reviews.
Thank you!
Greetings,
--
* David ‘Bombe’ Roden
‘Bombe’ Roden
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
mail/devl/2009-December/033809.html
> Thought about it again:
> "git bisect" might do the job.
Yes, it will, and reformatting will not change the results of a bisect.
Greetings,
--
* David ‘Bombe’ Roden
signature.asc
Descript
was changed, locate the commit that really
did it (using “git log -- ” or a GUI tool of your choice). This way you
will usually have all necessary context, such as simultaneous changes to other
files, preceeding and following commits, and of course the commit message.
Greetings,
--
stand the motivation behind getting it done as quickly as possible
(and that sure is tempting) but I don’t think the result would be code that
conforms to this particular style guide.
Greetings,
--
* David ‘Bombe’ Roden
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with O
al” is.
Greetings,
--
* David ‘Bombe’ Roden
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
Hi there,
initiated by a change in a pull request[1] the issue of coding style (or coding
standard) popped up, once again. Instead of inventing our own coding style I
proposed on IRC that we used either SUN’s Code Conventions[2] or Google’s Java
Style[3].
Now that I’ve looked for the URL I wou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/27/2013 08:59 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> I don't have a big problem with this, as mockito appears to be
> packaged in debian. Best not to use a more recent version as
> installing java software can be problematic and insecure.
The exact vers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey, everybody.
I would like to add Mockito [1] to the testing environment. This would
allow us to test parts of Freenet a lot better because we wouldn’t
have to spawn up a complete node for every test.
Any opinions? (And: how exactly would we treat
least basic knowledge of how it works in
Java? I guess that would be better for all.
Greetings,
Bombe
--
David ?Bombe? Roden
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Thi
least basic knowledge of how it works in
Java? I guess that would be better for all.
Greetings,
Bombe
--
David ‘Bombe’ Roden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
Yes, kids, both your penisses are incredibly long. Now shut up and let the
grown-ups do some refactoring.
Greetings,
David
On 23.03.2012, at 04:47, Ximin Luo wrote:
> LOL, are you kidding me?
>
> Please point to the exact lines of code that results in "double-digit
> millisecond paus
Yes, kids, both your penisses are incredibly long. Now shut up and let the
grown-ups do some refactoring.
Greetings,
David
On 23.03.2012, at 04:47, Ximin Luo wrote:
> LOL, are you kidding me?
>
> Please point to the exact lines of code that results in "double-digit
> millisecond paus
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 23:02 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> There was a statistic a long time ago - put an unpatched windows PC on the
> internet and it will be compromised within N minutes.
g in there, either. So whatever it was that bit you
back then it must have been something different and you just
mis-diagnosed it. :/
Greetings,
David
--
David ?Bombe? Roden
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/p
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 23:02 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> There was a statistic a long time ago - put an unpatched windows PC on the
> internet and it will be compromised within N minutes.
From personal experimentation I can say that N = 18.
Greetings,
David
--
David
g in there, either. So whatever it was that bit you
back then it must have been something different and you just
mis-diagnosed it. :/
Greetings,
David
--
David ‘Bombe’ Roden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
On 18.03.2012, at 19:37, Steve Dougherty wrote:
> Is this what you're looking for?
>
> http://new-wiki.freenetproject.org/Coding_standards
In light of 3ef15c7701d666f7661cd9b58b41ae525ef32569, does toad know about
these?
Greetings,
David
On 18.03.2012, at 19:37, Steve Dougherty wrote:
> Is this what you're looking for?
>
> http://new-wiki.freenetproject.org/Coding_standards
In light of 3ef15c7701d666f7661cd9b58b41ae525ef32569, does toad know about
these?
Greetings,
David
__
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 21:23 -0500, Leah Hicks wrote:
> My primary suggestions are:
>
>
>
> --
I think we can all agree with that.
> -- Leah Hicks
Greetings,
David
--
David ?Bombe? Roden
-- next part --
A non-text attachment wa
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 21:23 -0500, Leah Hicks wrote:
> My primary suggestions are:
>
>
>
> --
I think we can all agree with that.
> -- Leah Hicks
Greetings,
David
--
David ‘Bombe’ Roden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally s
?testing? branch.
Greetings,
David
--
David ?Bombe? Roden
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.
“testing” branch.
Greetings,
David
--
David ‘Bombe’ Roden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
ick to these simple rules, that would be fantastic. :)
Greetings,
David
--
David ?Bombe? Roden
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
UR
ick to these simple rules, that would be fantastic. :)
Greetings,
David
--
David ‘Bombe’ Roden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
Hi Arne,
> 5. After you did multiple test-jars that way, ask Toad to integrate it
The whole point is to create a process in which toad is NOT involved as the
primary force because he is kind of the bottleneck here.
Greetings,
David
--
David ?Bombe? Roden
-- next p
Hi Arne,
> 5. After you did multiple test-jars that way, ask Toad to integrate it
The whole point is to create a process in which toad is NOT involved as the
primary force because he is kind of the bottleneck here.
Greetings,
David
--
David ‘Bombe’ Roden
signature.
ere at all? What about access to
the GitHub repositories?
I don?t want to sound grumpy but I am trying to help here and I feel a bit
left out in the rain.
Greetings,
David
--
David ?Bombe? Roden
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<
ere at all? What about access to
the GitHub repositories?
I don’t want to sound grumpy but I am trying to help here and I feel a bit
left out in the rain.
Greetings,
David
--
David ‘Bombe’ Roden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message p
hat I have
been told about.
I am not happy about this.
Greetings,
David
--
David ?Bombe? Roden
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20111213/9899f7d4/attachment.html>
--
hat I have
been told about.
I am not happy about this.
Greetings,
David
--
David ‘Bombe’ Roden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org
Hi Steve,
> Looks good. I wonder if perhaps the final group should be called "File
> Sharing" instead of "File Transfer"?
If only ?File Sharing? wouldn?t sound so illegal? :)
Greetings,
David
--
David ?Bombe? Roden
-- next part ---
Hi Steve,
> Looks good. I wonder if perhaps the final group should be called "File
> Sharing" instead of "File Transfer"?
If only “File Sharing” wouldn’t sound so illegal… :)
Greetings,
David
--
David ‘Bombe’ Roden
signature.asc
Description: This is
Hey, everybody.
As a response to [1] I would like to reorder the official plugins on
the plugin configuration list because it really is a mess.
I would a ?group? field to OfficialPluginDescription, order the
plugins by that group and alphabetically. Now, I ?only? need to assign
groups to th
Hey, everybody.
As a response to [1] I would like to reorder the official plugins on
the plugin configuration list because it really is a mess.
I would a group field to OfficialPluginDescription, order the
plugins by that group and alphabetically. Now, I only need to assign
groups to
ly from those users that like to live on the bleeding edge.
Other than that I don?t see any distinction, especially not on their
?officialness.?
Greetings,
David
--
David ?Bombe? Roden
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://em
ly from those users that like to live on the bleeding edge.
Other than that I don’t see any distinction, especially not on their
“officialness.”
Greetings,
David
--
David ‘Bombe’ Roden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
the development branch when you?re done with
it, and a master branch that the development branch is merged into when a
build is created (be it release or test). (?You? in this paragraph means ?you
personally or any person that is up to the task? so, basically, it means
?you.? :)
Greetings
the development branch when you’re done with
it, and a master branch that the development branch is merged into when a
build is created (be it release or test). (“You” in this paragraph means “you
personally or any person that is up to the task” so, basically, it means
“you.“ :)
Greetings,
David
--
David ?Bombe? Roden
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/2004/49790081/attachment.html>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signat
David
--
David ‘Bombe’ Roden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
situation.
I don?t have anything more to say at this moment, I just wanted to dump my
thoughts on the current situation, requesting comments.
Greetings,
David
--
David ?Bombe? Roden
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<ht
situation.
I don’t have anything more to say at this moment, I just wanted to dump my
thoughts on the current situation, requesting comments.
Greetings,
David
--
David ‘Bombe’ Roden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Di, 2011-04-19 at 19:35 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Plus, ideally we'd like Freenet to support multiple logins.
I?m not quite sure what you mean: Sone already does support multiple
logins and I am using Fred?s session handling.
David
On Di, 2011-04-19 at 19:35 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Plus, ideally we'd like Freenet to support multiple logins.
I’m not quite sure what you mean: Sone already does support multiple
logins and I am using Fred’s session handling.
David
On Tuesday 19 April 2011 15:19:05 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > 1. A servlet container (I suggest Jetty) [or adapt already existing
> > "SimpleToadletServer"]
> If we are building our own why do we need servlets? Aren't they
> significantly more complex even than toadlets?
Because most servlet cont
On Tuesday 19 April 2011 15:19:05 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > 1. A servlet container (I suggest Jetty) [or adapt already existing
> > "SimpleToadletServer"]
> If we are building our own why do we need servlets? Aren't they
> significantly more complex even than toadlets?
Because most servlet cont
On Monday 21 March 2011 00:32:33 martin at technomation.net wrote:
> Addressing security, Maven is a build system, it will not put
> anything in your distribution that is not specified by you (even if it
> does need to download a whole bunch of files into its repo to do so), so
> security should n
On Monday 21 March 2011 00:32:33 mar...@technomation.net wrote:
> Addressing security, Maven is a build system, it will not put
> anything in your distribution that is not specified by you (even if it
> does need to download a whole bunch of files into its repo to do so), so
> security should not
On Thursday 24 February 2011 07:44:56 Volodya wrote:
> Well, I can say that this does not really help my moral and motivation to
> continue working on Frost.
Then please just let it die. Give it a dignified death while that is still
possible.
Also, I was kind of taking all the whining serious
On Thursday 24 February 2011 07:44:56 Volodya wrote:
> Well, I can say that this does not really help my moral and motivation to
> continue working on Frost.
Then please just let it die. Give it a dignified death while that is still
possible.
Also, I was kind of taking all the whining serious
On Monday 24 January 2011 17:30:52 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Second point first: I will revoke most people's git rights to simplify
> release management. If you are working on stuff that isn't directly
> relevant to the release, please continue to work on it, but do so on a
> branch, e.g. on a git
On Monday 24 January 2011 17:30:52 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Second point first: I will revoke most people's git rights to simplify
> release management. If you are working on stuff that isn't directly
> relevant to the release, please continue to work on it, but do so on a
> branch, e.g. on a git
Good morning, everyone.
I have created a new feature request at
https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=4673. I?ll copy the description
here so you don?t have to click it yourself:
In order to make it possible to create links to a plugin?s page from Freesites
it should be possible that the
Good morning, everyone.
I have created a new feature request at
https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=4673. I’ll copy the description
here so you don’t have to click it yourself:
In order to make it possible to create links to a plugin’s page from Freesites
it should be possible that the
On Wednesday 08 December 2010 00:44:51 Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> But as you said previously no one uses darknet. How about a semi open net
> that uses a WOT attribute to decide what nodes to trust?
That would allow a direct connection between a WoT identity and an IP address?
unless I understood you
On Wednesday 08 December 2010 00:44:51 Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> But as you said previously no one uses darknet. How about a semi open net
> that uses a WOT attribute to decide what nodes to trust?
That would allow a direct connection between a WoT identity and an IP address—
unless I understood you
On Friday 03 December 2010 23:13:56 Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> There is also a lack of relative security.
>
> Is opennet more or less secure than tor?
> Is opennet more or less secure than using https?
> Is opennet more or less secure than bittorrent?
> Is darknet more secure than tor?
Unfortunately
On Friday 03 December 2010 23:13:56 Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> There is also a lack of relative security.
>
> Is opennet more or less secure than tor?
> Is opennet more or less secure than using https?
> Is opennet more or less secure than bittorrent?
> Is darknet more secure than tor?
Unfortunately
On Thursday 02 December 2010 23:28:21 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Interesting possibility, similar to some other networks. I'd be a bit
> worried about impact on routing - given the small performance bias in
> opennet, isn't it possible that the nearby peers location-wise are all in
> your country?
On Thursday 02 December 2010 23:28:21 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Interesting possibility, similar to some other networks. I'd be a bit
> worried about impact on routing - given the small performance bias in
> opennet, isn't it possible that the nearby peers location-wise are all in
> your country?
On Tuesday 23 November 2010 16:23:29 Ian Clarke wrote:
> > Without the sarcasm, it would have been even better, but well...
> Sarcasm is like bacon, it improves almost everything it is added to.
Bacon! ?
> Ian.
David
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scr
On Tuesday 23 November 2010 16:23:29 Ian Clarke wrote:
> > Without the sarcasm, it would have been even better, but well...
> Sarcasm is like bacon, it improves almost everything it is added to.
Bacon! ♥
> Ian.
David
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Friday 15 October 2010 22:01:55 Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> JS can be used for a lot of really really nasty tracking and anonymity
> busting.
So, you trust our Java code but not our JavaScript code?
I disregard the rest of your mail because I get the distinct feeling that you
are not separating
On Friday 15 October 2010 17:29:52 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> We are considering making it impossible to use Freenet without a browser
> supporting Javascript. Yes or no answers would be useful (feel free to
> make further comments).
Require? No. Offer? Absolutely! Even a little JavaScript (I sugg
On Friday 15 October 2010 22:01:55 Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> JS can be used for a lot of really really nasty tracking and anonymity
> busting.
So, you trust our Java code but not our JavaScript code?
I disregard the rest of your mail because I get the distinct feeling that you
are not separating
On Friday 15 October 2010 17:29:52 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> We are considering making it impossible to use Freenet without a browser
> supporting Javascript. Yes or no answers would be useful (feel free to
> make further comments).
Require? No. Offer? Absolutely! Even a little JavaScript (I sugg
On Tuesday 30 March 2010 12:35:00 Ximin Luo wrote:
> > No, it will not. If work on the branch continues (which is unlikely
> > because it has been merged so further work would happen on the master
> > branch) I would just merge master again. Simple and beautiful.
>
> What I meant by weird was it'
On Tuesday 30 March 2010 12:35:00 Ximin Luo wrote:
> > No, it will not. If work on the branch continues (which is unlikely
> > because it has been merged so further work would happen on the master
> > branch) I would just merge master again. Simple and beautiful.
>
> What I meant by weird was it'
On Tuesday 30 March 2010 00:15:32 Ximin Luo wrote:
> ahhh i see the problem. since Bombe's identicon branch was ahead of master,
> when you did "git merge", git automatically resolved this as a
> fast-forward, and moved the master branch pointer on top of the
> "identicon" branch pointer, instead
On Tuesday 30 March 2010 00:15:32 Ximin Luo wrote:
> ahhh i see the problem. since Bombe's identicon branch was ahead of master,
> when you did "git merge", git automatically resolved this as a
> fast-forward, and moved the master branch pointer on top of the
> "identicon" branch pointer, instead
On Thursday 25 March 2010 22:03:40 Ximin Luo wrote:
> To this end, how about this - for each subproject "project", have 2 repos,
>
> - project
> - project-shared
>
> "project" is the main repo that people fork, and which reviewed code is
> pulled into. "project-shared" is a repo which more peopl
On Thursday 25 March 2010 21:57:46 Ximin Luo wrote:
> My point is that there should be (and the only way to do that is to have a
> shared repository, because only repositories grant access). It's tedious to
> create a new branch just to do a one-off bug fix, and tedious to one-commit
> pulls from
On Thursday 25 March 2010 21:04:34 Ximin Luo wrote:
> however, repositories grant *access* to branches. if we move to the
> "distributed" model (mis-term IMO) we will effectively be removing a shared
> branch that a lot of people can commit to. i think this is a bad thing.
> sometimes you have ran
On Thursday 25 March 2010 20:39:50 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> It has been suggested, after various troubles recently with code cleanup
> patches, that a more traditionally git like workflow might work better -
> where fewer people have direct access to the repository and most
> contributors create
On Thursday 25 March 2010 22:03:40 Ximin Luo wrote:
> To this end, how about this - for each subproject "project", have 2 repos,
>
> - project
> - project-shared
>
> "project" is the main repo that people fork, and which reviewed code is
> pulled into. "project-shared" is a repo which more peopl
On Thursday 25 March 2010 21:57:46 Ximin Luo wrote:
> My point is that there should be (and the only way to do that is to have a
> shared repository, because only repositories grant access). It's tedious to
> create a new branch just to do a one-off bug fix, and tedious to one-commit
> pulls from
On Thursday 25 March 2010 21:04:34 Ximin Luo wrote:
> however, repositories grant *access* to branches. if we move to the
> "distributed" model (mis-term IMO) we will effectively be removing a shared
> branch that a lot of people can commit to. i think this is a bad thing.
> sometimes you have ran
On Thursday 25 March 2010 20:39:50 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> It has been suggested, after various troubles recently with code cleanup
> patches, that a more traditionally git like workflow might work better -
> where fewer people have direct access to the repository and most
> contributors create
On Friday 05 March 2010 15:19:53 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > the server side of web pushing does not depend on HTMLNode heavily,
> > and it will be a relatively easy task to migrate it to another base.
> > As only a few UpdateableElements present yet, it shouldn't take more
> > than a day of work.
On Friday 05 March 2010 15:19:53 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > the server side of web pushing does not depend on HTMLNode heavily,
> > and it will be a relatively easy task to migrate it to another base.
> > As only a few UpdateableElements present yet, it shouldn't take more
> > than a day of work.
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 15:00:54 Christian Funder Sommerlund (Zero3) wrote:
> Matthew Toseland skrev:
> > On Saturday 16 January 2010 15:19:32 David ?Bombe? Roden wrote:
> >> On Thursday 14 January 2010 17:18:31 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >>> Content of Evil was
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 15:00:54 Christian Funder Sommerlund (Zero3) wrote:
> Matthew Toseland skrev:
> > On Saturday 16 January 2010 15:19:32 David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
> >> On Thursday 14 January 2010 17:18:31 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >>> Content of Evil was
On Thursday 14 January 2010 17:18:31 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Content of Evil was uploaded from a dial-up modem for several years!
A-HA! So you admit to being CofE? :)
Bombe
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: applica
On Thursday 14 January 2010 17:18:31 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Content of Evil was uploaded from a dial-up modem for several years!
A-HA! So you admit to being CofE? :)
Bombe
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_
On Monday 04 January 2010 22:48:35 Ximin Luo wrote:
> In the meantime, I've given "editor" to the following:
> * Droden (Created on 4 January 2010 at 21:41)
> I assume all of those are people from here; the accounts were all created
> after I sent around the first email.
Yes, that one is me,
On Monday 04 January 2010 22:48:35 Ximin Luo wrote:
> In the meantime, I've given "editor" to the following:
> * Droden (Created on 4 January 2010 at 21:41)
> I assume all of those are people from here; the accounts were all created
> after I sent around the first email.
Yes, that one is me,
On Sunday 20 December 2009 13:36:54 Ximin Luo wrote:
> I've merged everything from Bombe, nextgens, saces.
Cool, thanks a lot. Now the code has finally caught up with the documentation
I added to the wiki about the disconnect message. :)
David
-- next part --
A
On Sunday 20 December 2009 13:36:54 Ximin Luo wrote:
> I've merged everything from Bombe, nextgens, saces.
Cool, thanks a lot. Now the code has finally caught up with the documentation
I added to the wiki about the disconnect message. :)
David
signature.asc
Description: This is a di
On Sunday 20 December 2009 00:38:54 David ?Bombe? Roden wrote:
> On Thursday 17 December 2009 22:12:20 Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote:
> > On Wednesday 16 December 2009 20:44:53 David ?Bombe? Roden wrote:
> > > > but, this is only true for file-by-fi
On Thursday 17 December 2009 22:12:20 Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 December 2009 20:44:53 David ?Bombe? Roden wrote:
> > > but, this is only true for file-by-file uploads. the mass downloader
> > > does not have this option.
> > Of
On Sunday 20 December 2009 00:38:54 David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
> On Thursday 17 December 2009 22:12:20 Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote:
> > On Wednesday 16 December 2009 20:44:53 David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
> > > > but, this is only true for file-by-fi
On Thursday 17 December 2009 22:12:20 Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 December 2009 20:44:53 David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
> > > but, this is only true for file-by-file uploads. the mass downloader
> > > does not have this option.
> > Of
On Wednesday 16 December 2009 07:32:14 Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote:
> > We do provide an option for not attempting any compression at all.
> but, this is only true for file-by-file uploads. the mass downloader does
> not have this option.
Of course not, this option does not make any sense
On Wednesday 16 December 2009 07:32:14 Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote:
> > We do provide an option for not attempting any compression at all.
> but, this is only true for file-by-file uploads. the mass downloader does
> not have this option.
Of course not, this option does not make any sense
On Saturday 25 July 2009 20:32:51 Evan Daniel wrote:
> If the documentation were merely out of date, I would agree. However,
> it's not out of date, it's nonexistant. Also, the main APIs have been
> stable enough for long enough that I don't think this is an excuse any
> longer, especially for p
On Saturday 25 July 2009 20:32:51 Evan Daniel wrote:
> If the documentation were merely out of date, I would agree. However,
> it's not out of date, it's nonexistant. Also, the main APIs have been
> stable enough for long enough that I don't think this is an excuse any
> longer, especially for p
On Thursday 23 July 2009 15:10:06 Jonas Bengtsson wrote:
> > Are the ?Identifier? fields in these messages really necessary? Isn?t the
> > ?SubscribeFeeds? command somehow equivalent to a ?WatchGlobal? (which
> > does not have an identifier)?
> Several feed subscriptions per client would only make
On Thursday 23 July 2009 15:10:06 Jonas Bengtsson wrote:
> > Are the “Identifier” fields in these messages really necessary? Isn’t the
> > “SubscribeFeeds” command somehow equivalent to a “WatchGlobal” (which
> > does not have an identifier)?
> Several feed subscriptions per client would only make
On Thursday 23 July 2009 07:10:15 Jonas Bengtsson wrote:
> SubscribeFeeds
> Identifier=Arbitrary text string
> SubscribedFeed
> Identifier=Identifier of the subscription
Are the ?Identifier? fields in these messages really necessary? Isn?t the
?SubscribeFeeds? command somehow equivalent to a ?W
1 - 100 of 364 matches
Mail list logo
