[freenet-dev] Profiling the node

us to use the full-featured product to work on > > > Freenet. > > > > > > In case you would like a license just drop me a line. So far I, > > > toad and sdiz have got a license and Bombe requested one. I plan > > > to get back in touch with them

Re: [freenet-dev] Profiling the node

. In case you would like a license just drop me a line. So far I, toad and sdiz have got a license and Bombe requested one. I plan to get back in touch with them on Monday... manifest yourself before then if needed. NextGen$ Hi, The licenses we got are now expired: shall we

[freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

* xor [2009-08-16 17:33:15]: > On Sunday 16 August 2009 16:38:15 NextGen$ wrote: > > Hi, > > > > What are you doing here? starting an edit-war on the bug tracker? > > Editing the priority/milestone of loads of tickets won't help to get them > > implemented... an

[freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

Hi, What are you doing here? starting an edit-war on the bug tracker? Editing the priority/milestone of loads of tickets won't help to get them implemented... and it is spamming our inboxes (I'm still subscribed to most, like most of us). Changing the priority of tickets you've no business with

[freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

-06 16:46 Michael Rogers New Issue 2007-02-06 16:46 Michael Rogers svn-revision = 2007-02-07 00:13 David Sowder (Zothar)Issue Monitored: David Sowder (Zothar) 2007-02-08 16:33 Florent Daignière (NextGen$)Issue

Re: [freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

* xor x...@gmx.li [2009-08-16 17:33:15]: On Sunday 16 August 2009 16:38:15 NextGen$ wrote: Hi, What are you doing here? starting an edit-war on the bug tracker? Editing the priority/milestone of loads of tickets won't help to get them implemented... and it is spamming our inboxes (I'm

[freenet-dev] small website bugs

users dont know that Mac is *nix after all) > > > Will post more as I spot them > L. The JNLP descriptor is broken... and the mirroring section on the downloads page is complete bullshit. Not only freenet would fail, but it does exactly the opposite of what is described there. NextGen$

Re: [freenet-dev] small website bugs

that Mac is *nix after all) Will post more as I spot them L. The JNLP descriptor is broken... and the mirroring section on the downloads page is complete bullshit. Not only freenet would fail, but it does exactly the opposite of what is described there. NextGen

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

he bts integration, and other related things? How do you want released to be rolled? NextGen$

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

do you want released to be rolled? NextGen$ ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r23014 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: client client/async clients/http frost/message node node/fcp node/simulator

* Daniel Cheng <j16sdiz+freenet at gmail.com> [2008-10-23 08:12:14]: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 6:49 AM, NextGen$ > wrote: > > * Matthew Toseland [2008-10-22 20:48:24]: > > > >> On Wednesday 22 October 2008 01:09, NextGen$ wrote: > >>

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r23014 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: client client/async clients/http frost/message node node/fcp node/simulator

* Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-23 08:12:14]: On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 6:49 AM, NextGen$ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-22 20:48:24]: On Wednesday 22 October 2008 01:09, NextGen$ wrote: * Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-21 20

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r23014 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: client client/async clients/http frost/message node node/fcp node/simulator

* Matthew Toseland [2008-10-22 20:48:24]: > On Wednesday 22 October 2008 01:09, NextGen$ wrote: > > * Matthew Toseland [2008-10-21 20:53:51]: > > > > > On Tuesday 21 October 2008 16:24, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > > > Author: nextgens > >

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r23014 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: client client/async clients/http frost/message node node/fcp node/simulator

* Matthew Toseland [2008-10-21 20:53:51]: > On Tuesday 21 October 2008 16:24, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2008-10-21 15:24:47 + (Tue, 21 Oct 2008) > > New Revision: 23014 > > > > Modified: > >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/client/ArchiveManager.java >

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r23014 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: client client/async clients/http frost/message node node/fcp node/simulator

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-22 20:48:24]: On Wednesday 22 October 2008 01:09, NextGen$ wrote: * Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-21 20:53:51]: On Tuesday 21 October 2008 16:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-10-21 15:24:47 +

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r23014 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: client client/async clients/http frost/message node node/fcp node/simulator

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-21 20:53:51]: On Tuesday 21 October 2008 16:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-10-21 15:24:47 + (Tue, 21 Oct 2008) New Revision: 23014 Modified: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/client/ArchiveManager.java

[freenet-dev] RFC: "String Freeze" period before releaseing

* Daniel Cheng [2008-10-02 18:52:20]: > Hi List, > > The Chinese translator (yongjhen) asked if we can make a "String > freeze" period before releasing a build. During this period, no l10n > string are added or changed. This can make translator's job easier and >

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r22870 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node

* Matthew Toseland [2008-10-03 17:37:23]: > On Sunday 28 September 2008 11:40, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2008-09-28 10:40:27 + (Sun, 28 Sep 2008) > > New Revision: 22870 > > > > Modified: > >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/PeerNode.java > > Log:

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r22869 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: clients/http l10n

* Matthew Toseland [2008-10-03 17:37:19]: > On Sunday 28 September 2008 11:32, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2008-09-28 10:32:44 + (Sun, 28 Sep 2008) > > New Revision: 22869 > > > > Modified: > >

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r22878 - trunk/apps/new_installer/res/firefox_profile/chrome

* Matthew Toseland [2008-10-03 16:41:22]: > On Sunday 28 September 2008 13:50, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2008-09-28 12:50:15 + (Sun, 28 Sep 2008) > > New Revision: 22878 > > > > Modified: > >

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r22878 - trunk/apps/new_installer/res/firefox_profile/chrome

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-03 16:41:22]: On Sunday 28 September 2008 13:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-09-28 12:50:15 + (Sun, 28 Sep 2008) New Revision: 22878 Modified:

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r22869 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: clients/http l10n

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-03 17:37:19]: On Sunday 28 September 2008 11:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-09-28 10:32:44 + (Sun, 28 Sep 2008) New Revision: 22869 Modified:

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r22870 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-03 17:37:23]: On Sunday 28 September 2008 11:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-09-28 10:40:27 + (Sun, 28 Sep 2008) New Revision: 22870 Modified: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/PeerNode.java Log: Fix

Re: [freenet-dev] RFC: String Freeze period before releaseing

* Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-02 18:52:20]: Hi List, The Chinese translator (yongjhen) asked if we can make a String freeze period before releasing a build. During this period, no l10n string are added or changed. This can make translator's job easier and make sure the l10n is

[freenet-dev] Freenet usability review

* Ian Clarke [2008-09-26 19:32:27]: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:16 PM, NextGen$ freenetproject.org>wrote: > > > * Michael Rogers [2008-09-26 22:03:04]: > > > > > On Sep 24 2008, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > > >> As you say, we can't run as the i

[freenet-dev] Freenet usability review

* Michael Rogers [2008-09-26 22:03:04]: > On Sep 24 2008, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > >> As you say, we can't run as the installing user... > > > >Well, we can! provided we don't use the windows services at all but a > >shortcut in the startup menu or something like that... but we don't want >

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet usability review

* Michael Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-26 22:03:04]: On Sep 24 2008, Florent Daignière wrote: As you say, we can't run as the installing user... Well, we can! provided we don't use the windows services at all but a shortcut in the startup menu or something like that... but we don't

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet usability review

* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-26 19:32:27]: On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:16 PM, NextGen$ [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: * Michael Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-26 22:03:04]: On Sep 24 2008, Florent Daignière wrote: As you say, we can't run as the installing user... Well

[freenet-dev] Formulation (opennet/darknet)

* Julien Cornuwel [2008-08-08 20:23:38]: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > NextGen$ a ?crit : > > * Julien Cornuwel [2008-08-08 13:52:15]: > > > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> Hi,

[freenet-dev] Formulation (opennet/darknet)

* Julien Cornuwel [2008-08-08 20:25:45]: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > NextGen$ a ?crit : > > >> (I don't know of any other apps that produce long-lived UDP streams with > >> encrypted headers and payload, so your ISP can probably i

[freenet-dev] Formulation (opennet/darknet)

* Michael Rogers [2008-08-08 17:43:23]: > NextGen$ wrote: > > The user is right: > > You seems to be missunderstanding the issue here: as soon as you've ticked > > the opennet box, your node will announce and your ISP (if smart enough) will > > know t

[freenet-dev] Formulation (opennet/darknet)

x, your node will announce and your ISP (if smart enough) will know that you are running freenet. Switching to darknet afterwards won't help: your isp knows that you're running freenet and that's probably all he needs. NextGen$

Re: [freenet-dev] Formulation (opennet/darknet)

(if smart enough) will know that you are running freenet. Switching to darknet afterwards won't help: your isp knows that you're running freenet and that's probably all he needs. NextGen$ ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http

Re: [freenet-dev] Formulation (opennet/darknet)

* Michael Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-08 17:43:23]: NextGen$ wrote: The user is right: You seems to be missunderstanding the issue here: as soon as you've ticked the opennet box, your node will announce and your ISP (if smart enough) will know that you are running freenet

Re: [freenet-dev] Formulation (opennet/darknet)

* Julien Cornuwel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-08 20:25:45]: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 NextGen$ a écrit : (I don't know of any other apps that produce long-lived UDP streams with encrypted headers and payload, so your ISP can probably identify Freenet traffic even

Re: [freenet-dev] Formulation (opennet/darknet)

* Julien Cornuwel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-08 20:23:38]: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 NextGen$ a écrit : * Julien Cornuwel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-08 13:52:15]: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, A user (on IRC, french channel) suggested

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r20868 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: client/async support/io

* David ???Bombe??? Roden [2008-07-02 01:01:48]: > On Wednesday 02 July 2008 00:53:18 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > BucketChainFactory is used in InsertCompressor. > > Right, and InsertCompressor does not exist in trunk. It looks like nextgens > applied the patch for InsertCompressor to

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r20868 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: client/async support/io

* David ???Bombe??? Roden [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-02 01:01:48]: On Wednesday 02 July 2008 00:53:18 Matthew Toseland wrote: BucketChainFactory is used in InsertCompressor. Right, and InsertCompressor does not exist in trunk. It looks like nextgens applied the patch for

[freenet-dev] l10n update jun13-08

* Matthew Toseland [2008-07-01 13:40:39]: > On Friday 13 June 2008 14:24, Luke771 wrote: > > Updated to 1152 r20268 > > - Translated new strings about Java 1.4 => 1.5 > > - a couple of typos and minor rewordings. > > > Has this been applied to trunk? No.

[freenet-dev] Bug submission

* Ian Clarke [2008-06-22 10:33:09]: > I was surprised to read this on https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ :- > > "The first step in filing a bug report is a post to the support > mailing list. You must subscribe to post. If you get told it's a bug, > then come back here and file a bug report. When

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r20868 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: client/async support/io

* bombe at freenetproject.org [2008-06-29 17:03:08]: > Author: bombe > Date: 2008-06-29 17:03:08 + (Sun, 29 Jun 2008) > New Revision: 20868 > > Modified: >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/client/async/SingleFileInserter.java >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/support/io/BucketChainBucket.java >

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r20868 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: client/async support/io

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-29 17:03:08]: Author: bombe Date: 2008-06-29 17:03:08 + (Sun, 29 Jun 2008) New Revision: 20868 Modified: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/client/async/SingleFileInserter.java trunk/freenet/src/freenet/support/io/BucketChainBucket.java

Re: [freenet-dev] Bug submission

* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-22 10:33:09]: I was surprised to read this on https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ :- The first step in filing a bug report is a post to the support mailing list. You must subscribe to post. If you get told it's a bug, then come back here and file a bug

Re: [freenet-dev] l10n update jun13-08

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-01 13:40:39]: On Friday 13 June 2008 14:24, Luke771 wrote: Updated to 1152 r20268 - Translated new strings about Java 1.4 = 1.5 - a couple of typos and minor rewordings. Has this been applied to trunk? No.

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r20171 - trunk/apps/new_installer/scripts

* Matthew Toseland [2008-06-26 11:39:30]: > On Thursday 26 June 2008 09:43, NextGen$ wrote: > > * Matthew Toseland [2008-06-26 02:17:28]: > > > > > On Sunday 01 June 2008 05:23, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > > > Author: nextgens > > > &

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r20171 - trunk/apps/new_installer/scripts

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-26 11:39:30]: On Thursday 26 June 2008 09:43, NextGen$ wrote: * Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-26 02:17:28]: On Sunday 01 June 2008 05:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-06-01 04:23:44 + (Sun, 01

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r20171 - trunk/apps/new_installer/scripts

* Matthew Toseland [2008-06-26 02:17:28]: > On Sunday 01 June 2008 05:23, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2008-06-01 04:23:44 + (Sun, 01 Jun 2008) > > New Revision: 20171 > > > > Modified: > >trunk/apps/new_installer/scripts/update.sh > > Log: > >

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r20171 - trunk/apps/new_installer/scripts

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-26 02:17:28]: On Sunday 01 June 2008 05:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-06-01 04:23:44 + (Sun, 01 Jun 2008) New Revision: 20171 Modified: trunk/apps/new_installer/scripts/update.sh Log: new_installer:

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19204 - trunk/freenet/test/freenet/support

* wavey at freenetproject.org [2008-04-11 20:20:47]: > Author: wavey > Date: 2008-04-11 20:20:47 + (Fri, 11 Apr 2008) > New Revision: 19204 > > Added: >trunk/freenet/test/freenet/support/LoaderTest.java > Log: > added unit test > > Added:

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19204 - trunk/freenet/test/freenet/support

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-11 20:20:47]: Author: wavey Date: 2008-04-11 20:20:47 + (Fri, 11 Apr 2008) New Revision: 19204 Added: trunk/freenet/test/freenet/support/LoaderTest.java Log: added unit test Added: trunk/freenet/test/freenet/support/LoaderTest.java

[freenet-dev] Packet size proposal

other problems: it would slow down skype dramatically, > alienating a lot of users, so they'd need to put more hardware in to detect > skype... Skype can work over TCP if UDP is blocked. NextGen$

Re: [freenet-dev] Packet size proposal

skype... Skype can work over TCP if UDP is blocked. NextGen$ ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r17909 - trunk/contrib/NativeThread

mplexity : it's still unclear to me where that introduced complexity would come from but... anyway...) I've lost interest in working on that part of the code. As long as I'll be building the jars it will remain like that but if someone else volunteers to do it things can change ;) NextGen$ ---

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r17909 - trunk/contrib/NativeThread

would come from but... anyway...) I've lost interest in working on that part of the code. As long as I'll be building the jars it will remain like that but if someone else volunteers to do it things can change ;) NextGen$ signature.asc Description: Digital signature

[freenet-dev] automated builds, svn sync

ing scripts. Have I overlooked > them? Or is that the task of the site admin? > > Jack They are versionned in a different repository you don't have access to... Yes, it's the task of the site admin more than anything else. NextGen$

Re: [freenet-dev] automated builds, svn sync

admin? Jack They are versionned in a different repository you don't have access to... Yes, it's the task of the site admin more than anything else. NextGen$ ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman

[freenet-dev] Propagating opennet refs through darknet nodes

* Matthew Toseland [2007-08-06 22:28:30]: > FROM FROST: > > On Wednesday 01 August 2007 21:23, NextGen$ wrote: > > * Matthew Toseland [2007-07-26 20:01:34]: > > > On Thursday 26 July 2007 04:14, NextGen$ wrote: > > > > * Matthew Toseland [2007-07-25 18:39:1

Re: [freenet-dev] Propagating opennet refs through darknet nodes

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-06 22:28:30]: FROM FROST: On Wednesday 01 August 2007 21:23, NextGen$ wrote: * Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-07-26 20:01:34]: On Thursday 26 July 2007 04:14, NextGen$ wrote: * Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-07-25 18

[freenet-dev] Propagating opennet refs through darknet nodes

* Matthew Toseland [2007-07-26 20:01:34]: > On Thursday 26 July 2007 04:14, NextGen$ wrote: > > * Matthew Toseland [2007-07-25 18:39:11]: > > > I propose that darknet nodes be allowed to forward announcements and path > > > folding messages (ConnectDestination etc),

Re: [freenet-dev] Propagating opennet refs through darknet nodes

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-07-26 20:01:34]: On Thursday 26 July 2007 04:14, NextGen$ wrote: * Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-07-25 18:39:11]: I propose that darknet nodes be allowed to forward announcements and path folding messages (ConnectDestination etc

[freenet-dev] Propagating opennet refs through darknet nodes

* Matthew Toseland [2007-07-25 18:39:11]: > I propose that darknet nodes be allowed to forward announcements and path > folding messages (ConnectDestination etc), without including their own > noderefs. > > Any objections? _o/ It's a bad idea. Be informed that my node wont behave that way...

Re: [freenet-dev] Propagating opennet refs through darknet nodes

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-07-25 18:39:11]: I propose that darknet nodes be allowed to forward announcements and path folding messages (ConnectDestination etc), without including their own noderefs. Any objections? _o/ It's a bad idea. Be informed that my node wont behave

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r14189 - in trunk/apps/new_installer: . langpacks res/unix/bin res/windows/bin

* Matthew Toseland [2007-07-19 21:58:28]: > On Thursday 19 July 2007 18:16, NextGen$ wrote: > > * Matthew Toseland [2007-07-19 12:16:48]: > > > I'm not convinced it should just be a default. > > > > Huh ? isn't opennet useless if it's not the default ? I'm really s

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r14189 - in trunk/apps/new_installer: . langpacks res/unix/bin res/windows/bin

* Matthew Toseland [2007-07-19 12:16:48]: > I'm not convinced it should just be a default. Huh ? isn't opennet useless if it's not the default ? I'm really surprised that someone (you in particular) objects here :) > Can't we explicitly ask the user a yes/no, maybe during the post-setup

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r14189 - in trunk/apps/new_installer: . langpacks res/unix/bin res/windows/bin

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-07-19 12:16:48]: I'm not convinced it should just be a default. Huh ? isn't opennet useless if it's not the default ? I'm really surprised that someone (you in particular) objects here :) Can't we explicitly ask the user a yes/no, maybe during the

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r14189 - in trunk/apps/new_installer: . langpacks res/unix/bin res/windows/bin

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-07-19 21:58:28]: On Thursday 19 July 2007 18:16, NextGen$ wrote: * Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-07-19 12:16:48]: I'm not convinced it should just be a default. Huh ? isn't opennet useless if it's not the default ? I'm really

[freenet-dev] Persistent downloads never internally restarted?

* Bob Ham [2007-05-02 14:33:13]: > On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 19:02 +0200, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote: > > * bbackde at googlemail.com [2007-05-01 > > 18:50:31]: > > > > So now we know that reregisterAll helps, nothing new but its an info :) > > > >

[freenet-dev] Persistent downloads never internally restarted?

* Bob Ham [2007-05-02 14:33:13]: > On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 19:02 +0200, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote: > > * bbackde at googlemail.com [2007-05-01 > > 18:50:31]: > > > > So now we know that reregisterAll helps, nothing new but its an info :) > > > >

Re: [freenet-dev] Persistent downloads never internally restarted?

* Bob Ham [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-02 14:33:13]: On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 19:02 +0200, Florent Daignière (NextGen$) wrote: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-01 18:50:31]: So now we know that reregisterAll helps, nothing new but its an info :) It's worthless

[freenet-dev] Persistent downloads never internally restarted?

p; That doesn't mean I know how to fix the root cause of the problem. We need to catch the bug; implementing a hack (like starting more requests, rescheduling everything on a regular basis, implementing some stateful tracking of started requests) would only be a workaround. > On 5/1/07, Florent

[freenet-dev] Persistent downloads never internally restarted?

; I can confirm this behaviour. changing the priority of a request calls ClientRequestScheduler.reregisterAll(ClientRequester) ... meaning that nothing is very surprising... NextGen$ PS: see https://emu.freenetproject.org/svn/trunk/freenet/src/freenet/client/async/ClientRequestScheduler

Re: [freenet-dev] Persistent downloads never internally restarted?

. changing the priority of a request calls ClientRequestScheduler.reregisterAll(ClientRequester) ... meaning that nothing is very surprising... NextGen$ PS: see https://emu.freenetproject.org/svn/trunk/freenet/src/freenet/client/async/ClientRequestScheduler.java signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: [freenet-dev] Persistent downloads never internally restarted?

how to fix the root cause of the problem. We need to catch the bug; implementing a hack (like starting more requests, rescheduling everything on a regular basis, implementing some stateful tracking of started requests) would only be a workaround. On 5/1/07, Florent Daignière (NextGen$) [EMAIL

[freenet-dev] Fproxy and CSSes

Hi, Today I have implemented the ticket #1279 [1]: It's now possible to set and use an external CSS with fproxy. I hope it will encourage people to contribute and that it will lead to the improvement of bundled ones [2]. Contributions are welcome! NextGen

[freenet-dev] Fwd: TestDDA questions

* Matthew Toseland [2007-04-14 13:24:17]: > On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 01:03:18PM +0200, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote: > > * Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) [2007-04-14 > > 12:58:29]: > > > > > In the long term we will ask the client to send us a salted

[freenet-dev] Fwd: TestDDA questions

* Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) [2007-04-14 12:58:29]: > In the long term we will ask the client to send us a salted hash of the > full content in ClientPuts so that we can ensure it has read access to > the file. Toad wants that the node chooses the salt and that it is not >

[freenet-dev] TestDDA questions

* bbackde at googlemail.com [2007-04-14 12:45:07]: > Ah, so for WantRead a client must handle WriteFilename and > ContentToWrite, true? Really consuding, is'nt it ;) I have explained the why in my other message :) > > On 4/14/07, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) > wrote: > &g

[freenet-dev] Fwd: TestDDA questions

If the node is old it will work, if not it will reply with a ProtocolError and then you have to do the TestDDA proceedure... If it completes successfully you re-send the ClientPut/Get with dda otherwise you use direct mode. NextGen$ -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed.

[freenet-dev] TestDDA questions

* Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) [2007-04-14 12:30:53]: > * bbackde at googlemail.com [2007-04-14 10:32:25]: > > > I read the wiki doc about TestDDA and I have some comments/questions. > > > > 1) > > Please define "READ" and "WRITE" e

[freenet-dev] TestDDA questions

table now (me and toad agree on it) so it's unlikely to change... 1027 won't enforce testDDA but will feature it; 1028 is planned to be a self-mandatory release so yes it will enforce it... and no, sorry there is no ETA appart from "soon" yet. I will update the wiki to take your

Re: [freenet-dev] TestDDA questions

soon yet. I will update the wiki to take your remarks into account :) NextGen$ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] TestDDA questions

* Florent Daignière (NextGen$) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-14 12:30:53]: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-14 10:32:25]: I read the wiki doc about TestDDA and I have some comments/questions. 1) Please define READ and WRITE exactly. Do you plan to do any read operation

Re: [freenet-dev] Fwd: TestDDA questions

with a ProtocolError and then you have to do the TestDDA proceedure... If it completes successfully you re-send the ClientPut/Get with dda otherwise you use direct mode. NextGen$ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: [freenet-dev] Fwd: TestDDA questions

* Florent Daignière (NextGen$) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-14 12:58:29]: In the long term we will ask the client to send us a salted hash of the full content in ClientPuts so that we can ensure it has read access to the file. Toad wants that the node chooses the salt

Re: [freenet-dev] Fwd: TestDDA questions

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-14 13:24:17]: On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 01:03:18PM +0200, Florent Daignière (NextGen$) wrote: * Florent Daignière (NextGen$) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-14 12:58:29]: In the long term we will ask the client to send us a salted hash

Re: [freenet-dev] TestDDA questions

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-14 13:26:40]: Why do you want 1028 to be self-mandatory? So that we see how the network behaves and how messed up its topology is soon. NextGen$ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Devl

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r12626 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/l10n

* Matthew Toseland [2007-04-13 16:17:52]: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:09:16PM +, nextgens at freenetproject.org > wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2007-04-13 14:09:16 + (Fri, 13 Apr 2007) > > New Revision: 12626 > > > > Modified: > >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/l10n/L10n.java >

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r12626 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/l10n

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-13 16:17:52]: On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:09:16PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2007-04-13 14:09:16 + (Fri, 13 Apr 2007) New Revision: 12626 Modified: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/l10n/L10n.java Log: Doh

[freenet-dev] TestDDA etc was Re: FYI: Next Frost release

ot > convinced that being able to verify that the node can read from / write > to a specific file is useful. What is the specific use case here? A > client which only wants to show files which both the node and the client > can read? There's no point, just show what the client can read,

[freenet-dev] FYI: Next Frost release

ould be nice if you mark the messages with a "since xxx" because now > one could think the messages are there and can be used ... or can they > be used already? On trunk only :$ I'll mark it as "since 1027" NextGen$ -- next part -- A non-text attachment was

[freenet-dev] FYI: Next Frost release

* Matthew Toseland [2007-04-12 15:38:35]: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 02:26:38PM +0200, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote: > > * bbackde at googlemail.com [2007-04-12 > > 14:06:28]: > > > > > I looked over your source, but where is the point when the nod

[freenet-dev] FYI: Next Frost release

I hope you don't mind releasing often :) NextGen$ -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070412/e96363c4/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] FYI: Next Frost release

; it would be really nice if frost was able to handle it before next release :) It's not documented yet (might be done today) ; it's awaiting for code review from toad. NextGen$ -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signa

Re: [freenet-dev] FYI: Next Frost release

was able to handle it before next release :) It's not documented yet (might be done today) ; it's awaiting for code review from toad. NextGen$ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://emu.freenetproject.org

Re: [freenet-dev] FYI: Next Frost release

:) NextGen$ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] TestDDA etc was Re: FYI: Next Frost release

can read? There's no point, just show what the client can read, and upload directly if necessary. On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 04:47:46PM +0200, Florent Daignière (NextGen$) wrote: * Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-12 15:38:35]: On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 02:26:38PM +0200, Florent

[freenet-dev] 1026 - Internal error

you are running the trunk version it means that the JVM/bdb code is throwing a null object... Otherwise we will need the node's version number, possibly the freenet-ext version number as well and the result of java --version NextGen$ -- next part -- A non-text attachment was

Re: [freenet-dev] 1026 - Internal error

... Otherwise we will need the node's version number, possibly the freenet-ext version number as well and the result of java --version NextGen$ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http

[freenet-dev] l10n, i18n

/export java property files then :) NextGen$ -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070401/1d6cd3df/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] l10n, i18n

a special naming convention for keys ? I mean does ClassName.whatever fits the purpose or should we look for something a bit more evolved ? NextGen$ -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size:

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >