use maven once to create a build.xml for ant, which (maybe after
some tweaks) you can use to build your target package.
--
Thomas Sachau
Gentoo Linux Developer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Devl mailing list
Devl
a special setup including ramdisk and stuff and did not yet
migrate that to the official packages - and because I want to have the
simple auto-updater - but the packages are there and work.
Nice. Are they in the official package database?
Since early 2009
--
Thomas Sachau
Gentoo Linux
Ian Clarke schrieb:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
>> One reason to not use pre-compiled stuff is, that you can patch or
>> adjust the code before you compile it. In addition, only those patches
>> have a chance to go upstream, probably noone wil
Ian Clarke schrieb:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
>> I dont contribute code as a freenet dev, but i do package it for Gentoo
>> linux and from that perspective, i have to strongly vote against gwt.
>> That thing is a big beast with many inclu
d there was still no good
result. So unless this has greatly increased or someone else can provide
a sane package for Gentoo, requiring this framework to build freenet
would result in freenet being dropped from Gentoo as a package.
--
Thomas Sachau
Gentoo Linux Developer
-- next pa
can provide
a sane package for Gentoo, requiring this framework to build freenet
would result in freenet being dropped from Gentoo as a package.
--
Thomas Sachau
Gentoo Linux Developer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Devl
Ian Clarke schrieb:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
I dont contribute code as a freenet dev, but i do package it for Gentoo
linux and from that perspective, i have to strongly vote against gwt.
That thing is a big beast with many included external libs
Ian Clarke schrieb:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
One reason to not use pre-compiled stuff is, that you can patch or
adjust the code before you compile it. In addition, only those patches
have a chance to go upstream, probably noone will accept a patch
s way more complex. So from my point of
view as packager, i
am completly against a move to a more complex build system, while the current
one works fine.
--
Thomas Sachau
Gentoo Linux Developer
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
T
as packager, i
am completly against a move to a more complex build system, while the current
one works fine.
--
Thomas Sachau
Gentoo Linux Developer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
te very quickly.
Why do you want to kick it out, if it is quicker than the java implementation?
And what do you mean
by "current build system is going obsolete"?
--
Thomas Sachau
Gentoo Linux Developer
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed..
it out, if it is quicker than the java implementation?
And what do you mean
by current build system is going obsolete?
--
Thomas Sachau
Gentoo Linux Developer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Devl mailing list
Devl
ive, so most people don't?
> 2) It would slightly increase the difficulty of getting Freenet working on
> free JVMs.
Icedtea is a free JVM and does support 1.6 (i actually use it, so i can
confirm, that it works with
freenet), so this part should not stop 1.6 requirements.
--
Thomas Sa
don't?
2) It would slightly increase the difficulty of getting Freenet working on
free JVMs.
Icedtea is a free JVM and does support 1.6 (i actually use it, so i can
confirm, that it works with
freenet), so this part should not stop 1.6 requirements.
--
Thomas Sachau
Gentoo Linux Developer
Am 16.10.2010 13:38, schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> On Friday 15 October 2010 22:54:31 Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> Am 15.10.2010 17:29, schrieb Matthew Toseland:
>>> We are considering making it impossible to use Freenet without a browser
>>> supporting Javascript. Yes or
e me away, both as a
contributor (some
translations, bug reports and packages for Gentoo Linux) and followed by that,
because of missing
packages, as a user, since i dont expect packaging GWT to be much easier these
days.
--
Thomas Sachau
Gentoo Linux Developer
-- next part --
Am 16.10.2010 13:38, schrieb Matthew Toseland:
On Friday 15 October 2010 22:54:31 Thomas Sachau wrote:
Am 15.10.2010 17:29, schrieb Matthew Toseland:
We are considering making it impossible to use Freenet without a browser
supporting Javascript. Yes or no answers would be useful (feel free
as a
contributor (some
translations, bug reports and packages for Gentoo Linux) and followed by that,
because of missing
packages, as a user, since i dont expect packaging GWT to be much easier these
days.
--
Thomas Sachau
Gentoo Linux Developer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Am 03.08.2010 03:15, schrieb Masayuki Hatta:
> Hi,
>
> 2010/8/3 Thomas Sachau :
>> Am 02.08.2010 07:19, schrieb Masayuki Hatta:
>
>>> 1. Currently, so-called headless build (without setting DISPLAY)
>>> fails. This is a serious problem since the automa
Am 03.08.2010 03:15, schrieb Masayuki Hatta:
Hi,
2010/8/3 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org:
Am 02.08.2010 07:19, schrieb Masayuki Hatta:
1. Currently, so-called headless build (without setting DISPLAY)
fails. This is a serious problem since the automated build daemon is
quite common
et, since freenet still behaves a bit special in some
areas.
--
Thomas Sachau
Gentoo Linux Developer
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL
installing updated .deb., at least FHS-wise.
Using the java wrapper should not be a problem, if it is properly packaged. But
freenet should not
autoupdate itself, instead, it should be updated via package manager as any
other packaged program.
--
Thomas Sachau
Gentoo Linux Developer
--
, if it is properly packaged. But
freenet should not
autoupdate itself, instead, it should be updated via package manager as any
other packaged program.
--
Thomas Sachau
Gentoo Linux Developer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Devl
freenet still behaves a bit special in some
areas.
--
Thomas Sachau
Gentoo Linux Developer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On 02/13/2010 05:19 PM, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Thomas Sachau
> wrote:
>
>> If i remember it right, there was a goal to get packagers for freenet for
>> different distros. If you
>> really want to force GWT as a dependency without a way t
On 02/13/2010 04:27 PM, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
>> > I don't accept that, but I *do* support using GWT. GWT is a good means
>> to generate cross platform Javascript code.
>>
>> I disagree with both of
On 02/13/2010 01:19 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Friday 12 February 2010 00:50:30 Ian Clarke wrote:
>>
>> Firstly, all I've done is made a proposal, and defended that proposal, I'm
>> not dictating anything to anyone.
>>
>> The reality however is that FProxy is a mess. We've basically
On 02/13/2010 05:19 PM, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Thomas Sachau m...@tommyserver.de wrote:
If i remember it right, there was a goal to get packagers for freenet for
different distros. If you
really want to force GWT as a dependency without a way to compile it from
Markus schrieb:
> it is not very much...
Thanks, committed in 7be0d39d20459cb2821ecbcdeb1bb1c5e1353d96
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
Markus schrieb:
it is not very much...
Thanks, committed in 7be0d39d20459cb2821ecbcdeb1bb1c5e1353d96
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
Markus schrieb:
> I had to correct something...
> here is the new version.
>
thanks, added to fred-staging
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
Markus schrieb:
I had to correct something...
here is the new version.
thanks, added to fred-staging
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
Alex Pyattaev schrieb:
> Hello!
> Just encountered a bad problem - I do not know how to fix the update
> mechanism for my gentoo installation. I used the ebuild system to install
> freenet, and it "should" fetch latest snapshot upon every install. However,
> the node continues to give Update
Alex Pyattaev schrieb:
Hello!
Just encountered a bad problem - I do not know how to fix the update
mechanism for my gentoo installation. I used the ebuild system to install
freenet, and it should fetch latest snapshot upon every install. However,
the node continues to give Update Failed:
Evan Daniel schrieb:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>>> A small number could still be rather large. Having thousands see it
>>> ought to suffice. For the current network, I see no reason not to
>>> have the (default) limits suc
Evan Daniel schrieb:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> Evan Daniel schrieb:
>>> That is fundamentally a hard problem.
>>> - Advogato is not perfect. I am certain there will be some amount of
>>> spam getting through;
Evan Daniel schrieb:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 4:45 PM, xor wrote:
>> On Friday 22 May 2009 16:39:06 Evan Daniel wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Matthew Toseland
>>>
>>> wrote:
On Friday 22 May 2009 08:17:55 bbackde at googlemail.com wrote:
> Is'nt his point that the users
Evan Daniel schrieb:
> That is fundamentally a hard problem.
> - Advogato is not perfect. I am certain there will be some amount of
> spam getting through; hopefully it will be a small amount.
> - With Advogato, the amount of spam possible is well defined. With
> FMS and WoT it is not. Neither
Evan Daniel schrieb:
That is fundamentally a hard problem.
- Advogato is not perfect. I am certain there will be some amount of
spam getting through; hopefully it will be a small amount.
- With Advogato, the amount of spam possible is well defined. With
FMS and WoT it is not. Neither of
Evan Daniel schrieb:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 4:45 PM, xor x...@gmx.li wrote:
On Friday 22 May 2009 16:39:06 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Friday 22 May 2009 08:17:55 bbac...@googlemail.com wrote:
Is'nt his point that
Evan Daniel schrieb:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Thomas Sachau m...@tommyserver.de wrote:
Evan Daniel schrieb:
That is fundamentally a hard problem.
- Advogato is not perfect. I am certain there will be some amount of
spam getting through; hopefully it will be a small amount
Evan Daniel schrieb:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Thomas Sachau m...@tommyserver.de wrote:
A small number could still be rather large. Having thousands see it
ought to suffice. For the current network, I see no reason not to
have the (default) limits such that basically everyone sees
Evan Daniel schrieb:
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Thomas Sachau
> wrote:
>> Matthew Toseland schrieb:
>>> On Friday 22 May 2009 08:17:55 bbackde at googlemail.com wrote:
>>>> Is'nt his point that the users just won't maintain the trust lists?
>>&
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
> On Friday 22 May 2009 08:17:55 bbackde at googlemail.com wrote:
>> Is'nt his point that the users just won't maintain the trust lists?
>> I thought that is the problem that he meant how can Advogato help us
>> here?
>
> Advogato with only positive trust introduces
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
On Friday 22 May 2009 08:17:55 bbac...@googlemail.com wrote:
Is'nt his point that the users just won't maintain the trust lists?
I thought that is the problem that he meant how can Advogato help us
here?
Advogato with only positive trust introduces a different
Evan Daniel schrieb:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Thomas Sachau m...@tommyserver.de wrote:
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
On Friday 22 May 2009 08:17:55 bbac...@googlemail.com wrote:
Is'nt his point that the users just won't maintain the trust lists?
I thought that is the problem that he
Arne Babenhauserheide schrieb:
> On Saturday, 16. May 2009 16:02:19 Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> Additionally, Gentoo is about choice, if there is a warning, the user can
>> choose, with a forcing script, there is no choice, which is a bad idea for
>> this philosophy, th
Arne Babenhauserheide schrieb:
On Saturday, 16. May 2009 16:02:19 Thomas Sachau wrote:
Additionally, Gentoo is about choice, if there is a warning, the user can
choose, with a forcing script, there is no choice, which is a bad idea for
this philosophy, therefor i vote against such a script
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
> On Friday 15 May 2009 16:35:40 Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> Matthew Toseland schrieb:
>>> On Thursday 14 May 2009 18:35:07 Thomas Sachau wrote:
>>>> Matthew Toseland schrieb:
>>>>> My observation: Can we get rid of the
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
On Friday 15 May 2009 16:35:40 Thomas Sachau wrote:
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
On Thursday 14 May 2009 18:35:07 Thomas Sachau wrote:
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
My observation: Can we get rid of the I will configure it manually
choice?
And maybe the welcome page
xor schrieb:
> On Thursday 14 May 2009 19:35:07 Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> Matthew Toseland schrieb:
>>> My observation: Can we get rid of the "I will configure it manually"
>>> choice? And maybe the welcome page? (#3094)
>> You want to force everyone to
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
> On Thursday 14 May 2009 18:35:07 Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> Matthew Toseland schrieb:
>>> My observation: Can we get rid of the "I will configure it manually"
>>> choice?
>>> And maybe the welcome page? (#3094)
>> Yo
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
On Thursday 14 May 2009 18:35:07 Thomas Sachau wrote:
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
My observation: Can we get rid of the I will configure it manually
choice?
And maybe the welcome page? (#3094)
You want to force everyone to use the Wizard?
Why would that be bad
xor schrieb:
On Thursday 14 May 2009 19:35:07 Thomas Sachau wrote:
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
My observation: Can we get rid of the I will configure it manually
choice? And maybe the welcome page? (#3094)
You want to force everyone to use the Wizard?
Because we were both on the same LAN
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
> My observation: Can we get rid of the "I will configure it manually" choice?
> And maybe the welcome page? (#3094)
You want to force everyone to use the Wizard?
> Because we were both on the same LAN, it did not connect, until I told him to
> set it to allow local
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
My observation: Can we get rid of the I will configure it manually choice?
And maybe the welcome page? (#3094)
You want to force everyone to use the Wizard?
Because we were both on the same LAN, it did not connect, until I told him to
set it to allow local
Luke771 schrieb:
> I can't comment on the technical part because I wouldnt know what im
> talking about.
> However, I do like the 'social' part (being able to see an identity even
> if the censors mark it down it right away as it's created)
"The censors"? There is no central authority to censor
Luke771 schrieb:
>>> Also, what about an option for ignoring the WoT's opinion until a newbie
>>> has posted at least N messages, or M time has elapsed?
>>>
>> Sounds like a better idea than hash cash.
>>
>>
> great idea
> it would solve the problem in a simple elegant way, and without all
Luke771 schrieb:
Also, what about an option for ignoring the WoT's opinion until a newbie
has posted at least N messages, or M time has elapsed?
Sounds like a better idea than hash cash.
great idea
it would solve the problem in a simple elegant way, and without all the
hashcash
Luke771 schrieb:
I can't comment on the technical part because I wouldnt know what im
talking about.
However, I do like the 'social' part (being able to see an identity even
if the censors mark it down it right away as it's created)
The censors? There is no central authority to censor
Evan Daniel schrieb:
> I don't have any specific ideas for how to choose whether to ignore
> identities, but I think you're making the problem much harder than it
> needs to be. The problem is that you need to prevent spam, but at the
> same time prevent malicious non-spammers from censoring
xor schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> I am currently refactoring the WoT plugin to allow per-context trust values.
>
> Lets first explain how WoT currently works so you can understand what I mean:
> - There is a set of Identities. An identity has a SSK URI, a nick name, a set
> of contexts (and a set of
xor schrieb:
Hello,
I am currently refactoring the WoT plugin to allow per-context trust values.
Lets first explain how WoT currently works so you can understand what I mean:
- There is a set of Identities. An identity has a SSK URI, a nick name, a set
of contexts (and a set of
Evan Daniel schrieb:
I don't have any specific ideas for how to choose whether to ignore
identities, but I think you're making the problem much harder than it
needs to be. The problem is that you need to prevent spam, but at the
same time prevent malicious non-spammers from censoring
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
> 1. Release the 20 nodes barrier (206 votes)
>
> As I have mentioned IMHO this is a straightforward plea for more performance.
>
> 2. One GUI for all. (155 votes)
>
> This is usability, particularly bundling more functionality. VIVE LA Freetalk!
>
> 3. Add a 'pause'
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
1. Release the 20 nodes barrier (206 votes)
As I have mentioned IMHO this is a straightforward plea for more performance.
2. One GUI for all. (155 votes)
This is usability, particularly bundling more functionality. VIVE LA Freetalk!
3. Add a 'pause' feature.
freenetwork at web.de schrieb:
> Well, I felt kind of sorry to see the project move away from SVN.
> I've got good results with SVN; I use it for my home projects, at work,
> have contact to other SVN-users, etc.
> And it has that wonderful TortoiseSVN Windoze-Explorer-Extension.
>
> What I found
Luke 771 schrieb:
> updated to latest trunk as of march 31 2009
> I thought I sent it last tuesday but now I think I probably haven't
>
>
Seems like this one was forgotten, i did it now. It is in r26889
Usually with some reminder it should do it. At least i dont have always time to
do a
Luke 771 schrieb:
updated to latest trunk as of march 31 2009
I thought I sent it last tuesday but now I think I probably haven't
Seems like this one was forgotten, i did it now. It is in r26889
Usually with some reminder it should do it. At least i dont have always time to
do a commit
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
> Which DSCM should we switch to? Last time we discussed this, we decided on
> mercurial (hg). We need a decision in the near future - it has dragged out
> for 6 months due to technical and communication problems, but nextgens is
> able and willing to implement a
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
Which DSCM should we switch to? Last time we discussed this, we decided on
mercurial (hg). We need a decision in the near future - it has dragged out
for 6 months due to technical and communication problems, but nextgens is
able and willing to implement a change in
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
> On Monday 02 March 2009 16:47:58 Luke771 wrote:
>> updated to r25869
>> Luke
>>
> Has this been committed yet?
Seems like it was not done yet, just commit in r25993.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
On Monday 02 March 2009 16:47:58 Luke771 wrote:
updated to r25869
Luke
Has this been committed yet?
Seems like it was not done yet, just commit in r25993.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Devl
Ian Clarke schrieb:
> This is great in many ways, of course any way to make Freenet easier
> to install almost has to be a good thing.
>
> However, like Matthew I'm also a little concerned about how well this
> will square with Freenet's rather frantic release cycle - and
> (relatively) frequent
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
> On Wednesday 04 March 2009 18:13:15 Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> Hi together,
>>
>> just a short announcement from me:
>>
>> Freenet (with all dependencies) and FMS are part of the main tree of Gentoo
> Linux, so their users
>> can
Hi together,
just a short announcement from me:
Freenet (with all dependencies) and FMS are part of the main tree of Gentoo
Linux, so their users
can now install freenet using their preferred package manager.
As usual, bug reports should be directed to the maintainer, either via IRC or
via
Hi together,
just a short announcement from me:
Freenet (with all dependencies) and FMS are part of the main tree of Gentoo
Linux, so their users
can now install freenet using their preferred package manager.
As usual, bug reports should be directed to the maintainer, either via IRC or
via
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 18:13:15 Thomas Sachau wrote:
Hi together,
just a short announcement from me:
Freenet (with all dependencies) and FMS are part of the main tree of Gentoo
Linux, so their users
can now install freenet using their preferred package
Ian Clarke schrieb:
This is great in many ways, of course any way to make Freenet easier
to install almost has to be a good thing.
However, like Matthew I'm also a little concerned about how well this
will square with Freenet's rather frantic release cycle - and
(relatively) frequent
Daniel Cheng schrieb:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
>> On Wednesday 28 January 2009 04:12, Daniel Cheng wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:20 PM, wrote:
Author: toad
Date: 2009-01-27 14:20:37 + (Tue, 27 Jan 2009)
New Revision: 25310
Luke771 schrieb:
> Updated to 1204 r25337
thanks, committed in r25380
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
Luke771 schrieb:
Updated to 1204 r25337
thanks, committed in r25380
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
Daniel Cheng schrieb:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Wednesday 28 January 2009 04:12, Daniel Cheng wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:20 PM, t...@freenetproject.org wrote:
Author: toad
Date: 2009-01-27 14:20:37 + (Tue, 27 Jan 2009)
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
> On Saturday 17 January 2009 23:50, svenerichoffmann at gmx.de wrote:
>> I think the only "real" solution to guarantee safety
>> is a dedicated freenet browser.
>
> Isn't that what I just said?
>> Trying to control the behaviour and safety of standard browsers
>> is
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
On Saturday 17 January 2009 23:50, svenerichoffm...@gmx.de wrote:
I think the only real solution to guarantee safety
is a dedicated freenet browser.
Isn't that what I just said?
Trying to control the behaviour and safety of standard browsers
is serious
Zero3 schrieb:
> Matthew Toseland skrev:
>> RUNNING AS A DEDICATED USER
>>
>>
>> At least one user saw his XP login screen changed as a result of Freenet
>> adding a user to run under. A number of users complained about it, or gave
>> it
>> as a reason for uninstalling. We
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
> On Thursday 01 January 2009 17:20, Ian Clarke wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Florent Daigni?re
>> wrote:
2008/12/31 Matthew Toseland :
I'd say lets raise the threshold, perhaps to 40. The arguments
against it seem a bit handwavey to justify
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
On Thursday 01 January 2009 17:20, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Florent Daignière
nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote:
2008/12/31 Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org:
I'd say lets raise the threshold, perhaps to 40. The arguments
against
Zero3 schrieb:
Matthew Toseland skrev:
RUNNING AS A DEDICATED USER
At least one user saw his XP login screen changed as a result of Freenet
adding a user to run under. A number of users complained about it, or gave
it
as a reason for uninstalling. We have discussed
89 matches
Mail list logo
