On Wednesday, 27 November 2013 at 14:37:11 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 November 2013 at 05:44:36 UTC, Jonathan M
Davis wrote:
And now I have to wrack my brain for ideas. :) I could
probably answer
questions about D all day, but coming up with something useful
to talk about
on my own
A fresh DUB release is out. Apart from the usual bug fixes, there are a
few considerable changes:
- Builds are now cached and only rebuilt when necessary for dub build
and dub run.
- Generated VisualD projects and the output of dub describe now
contain import files and string import files
On 2013-11-26 19:31:44 +, Sönke Ludwig said:
Homepage: http://vibed.org/
DUB package: http://code.dlang.org/packages/vibe-d
GitHub: https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d
Out of curiosity, it looks like vibe.d could be used to implement all
kind of network protocolls. Is that right?
Anything stream orientated. I didn't see a udp stream though that sounds
useful.
On 29 Nov 2013 19:35, Robert M. Münch robert.mue...@saphirion.com wrote:
On 2013-11-26 19:31:44 +, Sönke Ludwig said:
Homepage: http://vibed.org/
DUB package: http://code.dlang.org/packages/vibe-d
GitHub:
Am 29.11.2013 18:54, schrieb Rory McGuire:
Anything stream orientated. I didn't see a udp stream though that sounds
useful.
http://vibed.org/api/vibe.core.net/listenUDP
It's currently limited to TCP and UDP, but adding other protocols when
required is simple.
New dub v0.9.20 deb packages available at:
d-apt http://d-apt.sourceforge.net/
--
Jordi Sayol
On 29 Nov 2013 20:25, Sönke Ludwig slud...@outerproduct.org wrote:
http://vibed.org/api/vibe.core.net/listenUDP
It's currently limited to TCP and UDP, but adding other protocols when
required is simple.
Ooo could one write a Dns server with it?
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 19:15:13 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote:
New dub v0.9.20 deb packages available at:
d-apt http://d-apt.sourceforge.net/
Thank you.
BTW, it would be great to have packages for previous DMD
versions. You already support it for `libphobos2-nn` and almost
for all other
El 29/11/13 20:37, ilya-stromberg ha escrit:
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 19:15:13 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote:
New dub v0.9.20 deb packages available at:
d-apt http://d-apt.sourceforge.net/
Thank you.
BTW, it would be great to have packages for previous DMD versions. You
already support it
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 20:17:54 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 29/11/13 20:37, ilya-stromberg ha escrit:
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 19:15:13 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote:
New dub v0.9.20 deb packages available at:
d-apt http://d-apt.sourceforge.net/
Thank you.
BTW, it would be great to
On Friday, November 29, 2013 18:01:53 Sönke Ludwig wrote:
- Running dub --build=ddox runs a local HTTP server that provides
the docs instead of generating them all as actual HTML files.
Why would that be desirable? I would expect a set of HTML files if generating
documentation, and if a
El 29/11/13 21:54, ilya-stromberg ha escrit:
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 20:17:54 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 29/11/13 20:37, ilya-stromberg ha escrit:
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 19:15:13 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote:
New dub v0.9.20 deb packages available at:
d-apt
Am 29.11.2013 21:27, schrieb Shammah Chancellor:
On 2013-11-29 17:01:53 +, Sönke Ludwig said:
- Builds are now cached and only rebuilt when necessary for dub build
and dub run.
Doesn't seem to be working correctly for me. Won't rebuild after a
build failure.
Hm... there may be
Am 29.11.2013 20:28, schrieb Rory McGuire:
On 29 Nov 2013 20:25, Sönke Ludwig slud...@outerproduct.org
mailto:slud...@outerproduct.org wrote:
http://vibed.org/api/vibe.core.net/listenUDP
It's currently limited to TCP and UDP, but adding other protocols when
required is simple.
Ooo
Am 29.11.2013 23:05, schrieb Jonathan M Davis:
On Friday, November 29, 2013 18:01:53 Sönke Ludwig wrote:
- Running dub --build=ddox runs a local HTTP server that provides
the docs instead of generating them all as actual HTML files.
Why would that be desirable? I would expect a set of
Sönke Ludwig wrote:
A fresh DUB release is out. Apart from the usual bug fixes, there are a
few considerable changes:
Thanks! Have you considered adding a version number to dub help and/or a
--version option?
El 30/11/13 02:08, Piotr Szturmaj ha escrit:
Sönke Ludwig wrote:
A fresh DUB release is out. Apart from the usual bug fixes, there are a
few considerable changes:
Thanks! Have you considered adding a version number to dub help and/or a
--version option?
$ dub help
prints version on last
On Saturday, 30 November 2013 at 02:16:50 UTC, Puming wrote:
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 17:02:22 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
- Builds are now cached and only rebuilt when necessary for
dub build
and dub run.
When I build a vibe project, and edit the app.d and then build
again, an error
Am 30.11.2013 03:21, schrieb Puming:
On Saturday, 30 November 2013 at 02:16:50 UTC, Puming wrote:
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 17:02:22 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
- Builds are now cached and only rebuilt when necessary for dub build
and dub run.
When I build a vibe project, and edit the
On 2013-11-29 22:39:33 +, Sönke Ludwig said:
Am 29.11.2013 21:27, schrieb Shammah Chancellor:
On 2013-11-29 17:01:53 +, Sönke Ludwig said:
- Builds are now cached and only rebuilt when necessary for dub build
and dub run.
Doesn't seem to be working correctly for me. Won't rebuild
On 2013-11-30 02:58:50 +, Sönke Ludwig said:
This is planned, but (AFAIK) this is not yet possible in an optimal way
due to how DMD emits symbols to object files. Currently the only
reliable way to build incrementally is to compile a single file at a
time, but this is very inefficient
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 19:22:06 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Interesting. Could you please create a paste with the two code
samples?
Thanks,
Andrei
Hello,
here is the Go code:
package main
import (
fmt
)
type Point struct {
x, y int
}
type Rectangular
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 03:58:59 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
Has anyone else hit with Avast recognising Optlink as a
suspicious file since last update?
The same issue.
I added dmd folder to trusted list.
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 19:25:56 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 16:07:47 UTC, Bienlein wrote:
...
-- Bienlein
IMHO, problem with go simplicity is not as much as being not
expressive enough to do something as with being forced to move
lot of things to run-time.
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 08:32:12 UTC, Cooler wrote:
...
Try making fill array look more like this:
void fillArray(ref string[int] a) { a[10] = A; }
The issue is that an array (and/or associative array) is a value
type. Basically, you can look at it as a struct with a pointer
(and
On 29/11/13 08:50, Iain Buclaw wrote:
That repo doesn't seem to exist (must by my imagination).
It's just the branch imaginary in my regular Phobos repo (I always use feature
branches for new stuff).
The link works for me, what goes wrong for you?
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 08:48:03 UTC, Chris Cain wrote:
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 08:32:12 UTC, Cooler wrote:
...
Try making fill array look more like this:
void fillArray(ref string[int] a) { a[10] = A; }
The issue is that an array (and/or associative array) is a
value type.
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 09:39:57 UTC, Cooler wrote:
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 08:48:03 UTC, Chris Cain wrote:
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 08:32:12 UTC, Cooler wrote:
...
Try making fill array look more like this:
void fillArray(ref string[int] a) { a[10] = A; }
The issue is
Adam D. Ruppe:
It is perfectly valid to pass a string to the write function.
He simply called the wrong function.
Sorry.
Bye,
bearophile
hi,
D developer could subscribe to ohloh their D project. That is
quick and that do always some marketing about dlang. they are no
cost to do it
link - https://www.ohloh.net/languages/dmd
On Wednesday, 27 November 2013 at 20:13:32 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
I could have sworn we had byGrapheme somewhere, well apparently
not :(
Simple attempt:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1736
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 08:32:41 UTC, Pavel wrote:
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 03:58:59 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
Has anyone else hit with Avast recognising Optlink as a
suspicious file since last update?
The same issue.
I added dmd folder to trusted list.
I'm going to report
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 10:50:53 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 08:32:41 UTC, Pavel wrote:
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 03:58:59 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
Has anyone else hit with Avast recognising Optlink as a
suspicious file since last update?
The
On 29 November 2013 11:50, Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org wrote:
On 29 November 2013 08:57, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
On 29/11/13 08:50, Iain Buclaw wrote:
That repo doesn't seem to exist (must by my imagination).
It's just the branch imaginary in my
On 29 November 2013 08:57, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
On 29/11/13 08:50, Iain Buclaw wrote:
That repo doesn't seem to exist (must by my imagination).
It's just the branch imaginary in my regular Phobos repo (I always use
feature branches for new stuff).
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 08:29:04 UTC, Bienlein wrote:
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 19:22:06 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Interesting. Could you please create a paste with the two code
samples?
Thanks,
Andrei
Hello,
here is the Go code:
package main
import (
fmt
)
Chris:
But why on earth (a []byte)? The type is important, not the
name. I can give it any name. a, inComing, inBytes, response,
draculaBytes ...
I read that type array of byte(s), I find it a bit better than
D syntax, especially when types become a little more complex.
Bye,
bearophile
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 12:06:17 UTC, Chris wrote:
[1] Raises the question whether we've been conditioned by C or
whether C was intuitive.
My theory is that Go is from the beginning intended to be a
modernized C. If I look at C from that perspective I can always
explain why things
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 02:00:50 UTC, Chris Cain wrote:
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 01:44:34 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Still lacking proper beard ;)
A programmer without a beard! Blasphemy! Witch!
But anyway, going along with what you guys are saying, if
you've ever seen reviews
bearophile
I wonder, if it's just the way I've learned how to program that I
prefer
byte[] buf;
to
buf []byte; // Which seems a bit awkward to me. it's called
'buf' and it is an array of ... of what Drum roll r-r-r-r-r
... Of bytes! Yeah!!!
Maybe it's because in my culture we read
On 2013-11-28 22:01, Fra wrote:
Personally I would love to see this old issue finally implemented/fixed:
There can be only one alias this.
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6083
What would your choice be?
Binary compatibility with Objective-C:
http://michelf.ca/projects/d-objc/
On 2013-11-28 21:54, Xavier Bigand wrote:
Yep, that the goal, having applications with a real personality. I don't
think it's an issue especially when application is full screen and
respect pictographs (icons and texts) standards,...
real personality, it's more of trying to emulate the native
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 12:53:02 UTC, Chris wrote:
Very good point. But do we need to modernize C? C is only one
step away form assembly. So if you modernize this, your still
on the same level.
Agree. If I accept a language that simple then it needs to
deliver execution speed. And Go
* ARC
* rvalue - ref
* virtual-by-default
* GC improvements
* AA fixes
On 29 November 2013 07:01, Fra f...@b.it wrote:
Personally I would love to see this old issue finally implemented/fixed:
There can be only one alias this.
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6083
What would
On 2013-11-29 03:39, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
We'll probably keep it but not advertise it. But you're making a
terrible argument - you want us to keep a bankrupt artifact just because
you don't want to update your code.
That's the standard argument, can't remove/change this, will break
Hi,
I would like to share this article D's scope statement in C++
that I just found:
http://cppsecrets.blogspot.ca/2013/11/ds-scope-statement-in-c.html
Original source:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1rp8es/c_secrets_ds_scope_statement_in_c/
Matheus.
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 13:31:34 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-11-28 21:54, Xavier Bigand wrote:
Yep, that the goal, having applications with a real
personality. I don't
think it's an issue especially when application is full screen
and
respect pictographs (icons and texts)
On 2013-11-29 09:29, Bienlein wrote:
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 19:22:06 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Interesting. Could you please create a paste with the two code samples?
Thanks,
Andrei
Hello,
here is the Go code:
package main
import (
fmt
)
type Point struct {
x,
On 2013-11-29 06:14, brad clawsie wrote:
this has been a great thread and I've found a lot of the replies very
insightful. I've been programming in Go at work for about a year or so
now, so I have some opinions on Go that I believe are reasonably
informed, while I am still a D novice but hope to
On Tuesday, 26 November 2013 at 19:21:31 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 11/26/13 11:13 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Remembering to include '-lcurl' when importing std.net.curl is
perhaps
one urk. But this will be a no longer a problem if libphobos
is built
shared.
Interesting. Can we supply
On 29 November 2013 23:27, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2013-11-28 22:01, Fra wrote:
Personally I would love to see this old issue finally implemented/fixed:
There can be only one alias this.
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6083
What would your choice be?
Binary
On 2013-11-29 14:53, Chris wrote:
It's not about emulating. It's about innovating.
Qt tries to emulate the native toolkit, like it or not.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2013-11-29 14:45, MattCoder wrote:
Hi,
I would like to share this article D's scope statement in C++ that I
just found:
http://cppsecrets.blogspot.ca/2013/11/ds-scope-statement-in-c.html
Original source:
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 12:11:26 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Chris:
But why on earth (a []byte)? The type is important, not the
name. I can give it any name. a, inComing, inBytes, response,
draculaBytes ...
I read that type array of byte(s), I find it a bit better
than D syntax,
On 11/28/13 9:49 PM, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 05:14:14 UTC, brad clawsie wrote:
This might not be a fair assessment given my shallow experience with
D, but it seems much less polished relative to Go for setting up a
development environment and working with code
On 2013-11-29 15:08, Manu wrote:
I've been very excited about this for a long time... why is it sitting
in limbo?
I don't know. It seems Walter don't want us to be worse than
Objective-C, meaning he want ARC. But as far as I understand it, we
couldn't come to an agreement on how to
On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 13:11 +0100, bearophile wrote:
Chris:
But why on earth (a []byte)? The type is important, not the
name. I can give it any name. a, inComing, inBytes, response,
draculaBytes ...
I read that type array of byte(s), I find it a bit better than
D syntax, especially
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 05:51:48 UTC, Chris Cain wrote:
The whole build process is a lot more involved than it really
should be. Ideally you should be able to clone dmd, phobos, and
druntime and just have everything compile and be put into a
relative path together and just work. Maybe
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 12:06:17 UTC, Chris wrote:
[1] Raises the question whether we've been conditioned by C or
whether C was intuitive.
I'll answer for you: C was very counter intuitive which is why no
one has done exactly what it did since. Look up the spiral rule
for reading
On 11/29/13 5:43 AM, Manu wrote:
* ARC
* rvalue - ref
* virtual-by-default
* GC improvements
* AA fixes
These are good themes but a conversation with one of the bountysource
founders revealed to me that smaller, precise tasks for moderate amounts
tend to do better than large projects that
On 11/29/13 5:45 AM, MattCoder wrote:
Hi,
I would like to share this article D's scope statement in C++ that I
just found:
http://cppsecrets.blogspot.ca/2013/11/ds-scope-statement-in-c.html
Original source:
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 08:35:58 UTC, Bienlein wrote:
Could you just quickly describe what you mean by being forced
to move
lot of things to run-time? I simply don't see what you are
refering to.
For example the dreaded generics issue. You can workaround it in
many cases by using
On 11/29/13 5:47 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-11-29 03:39, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
We'll probably keep it but not advertise it. But you're making a
terrible argument - you want us to keep a bankrupt artifact just because
you don't want to update your code.
That's the standard
On 2013-11-29 16:15, Dicebot wrote:
After that just make symlink to dmd binary and add Phobos/druntime paths
to dmd.conf and you are ready to go.
dmd.conf.default is only for Linux. There's also no sc.ini for Windows.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 15:34:21 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-11-29 16:15, Dicebot wrote:
After that just make symlink to dmd binary and add
Phobos/druntime paths
to dmd.conf and you are ready to go.
dmd.conf.default is only for Linux. There's also no sc.ini for
Windows.
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 14:14:08 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-11-29 14:53, Chris wrote:
It's not about emulating. It's about innovating.
Qt tries to emulate the native toolkit, like it or not.
I don't think it's necessary to do that. You actually only need a
small set of
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 01:52:19PM +1100, Daniel Murphy wrote:
H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote in message
news:mailman.152.1385681675.3242.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
One of the most problematic things is that its implementation is
sprinkled throughout DMD (each bit interacting
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:51:05 -, Peter Alexander
peter.alexander...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 09:39:57 UTC, Cooler wrote:
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 08:48:03 UTC, Chris Cain wrote:
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 08:32:12 UTC, Cooler wrote:
...
Try making fill
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 15:21:26 UTC, Chris Cain wrote:
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 12:06:17 UTC, Chris wrote:
[1] Raises the question whether we've been conditioned by C or
whether C was intuitive.
I'll answer for you: C was very counter intuitive which is why
no one has done
On Wednesday, 27 November 2013 at 17:07:07 UTC, DLang Beginner
wrote:
Hello.
I want to make GUI applications with D, but I don't know which
are updated and ready to use, which are good and etc. Can you
help me with choosing the right one, guys?
I don't know which OS you're interested in,
On 30 November 2013 01:23, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 11/29/13 5:43 AM, Manu wrote:
* ARC
* rvalue - ref
* virtual-by-default
* GC improvements
* AA fixes
These are good themes but a conversation with one of the bountysource
founders revealed to me
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 10:30:36 UTC, Chris wrote:
There are voice analysis and speech processing toolkits like
Covarep and Voicebox (see links below) that were coded in
Matlab, because they were originally only prototypes. There has
been talk of porting them to C++. My first thought,
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 13:30:53 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
Whatever API / bindings you use, please don't expose non-native
UIs to users (drawn from scratch, either mimicking the native
UI or not). They never completely integrate with the OS, subtly
deviating from the native behaviour
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 20:55:02 UTC, Xavier Bigand
wrote:
What is native on windows ?
- Win32
- Winforms
- Qt Widgets (that is near Win32)?
I would say Win32. Winforms is mostly a thin wrapper over Win32.
However things get more complicated if you take into account WPF
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 21:01:39 UTC, Fra wrote:
Personally I would love to see this old issue finally
implemented/fixed:
There can be only one alias this.
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6083
What would your choice be?
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 16:58:47 UTC, Baz wrote:
In speech recognition you'll mostly use some frequency-domain
technics (not to name the fft), so basically if you don't want
to trigger a GC pass, don't use build-in array and make your
own array using alloc/malloc/free. For the classes
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 03:58:59 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
Has anyone else hit with Avast recognising Optlink as a
suspicious file since last update?
Since this spring I had issues when after linking my dmd-compiled
program with libjpeg the result was reported to have something
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 06:13:58PM +0100, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 21:01:39 UTC, Fra wrote:
Personally I would love to see this old issue finally
implemented/fixed:
There can be only one alias this.
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6083
What
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 16:58:47 UTC, Baz wrote:
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 10:30:36 UTC, Chris wrote:
There are voice analysis and speech processing toolkits like
Covarep and Voicebox (see links below) that were coded in
Matlab, because they were originally only prototypes. There
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 17:03:02 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 13:30:53 UTC, Luís Marques
wrote:
Whatever API / bindings you use, please don't expose
non-native UIs to users (drawn from scratch, either mimicking
the native UI or not). They never completely
On 2013-11-29 14:08:25 +, Manu turkey...@gmail.com said:
On 29 November 2013 23:27, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
Binary compatibility with Objective-C:
http://michelf.ca/projects/d-objc/
I've been very excited about this for a long time... why is it sitting in
limbo?
How is the
On 2013-11-29 15:10:27 +, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com said:
On 2013-11-29 15:08, Manu wrote:
I've been very excited about this for a long time... why is it sitting
in limbo?
I don't know. It seems Walter don't want us to be worse than
Objective-C, meaning he want ARC. But as far as I
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 00:52:27 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Nice game guess linked bug by poster nickname :)
mine quite works
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 17:14:00 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 21:01:39 UTC, Fra wrote:
Personally I would love to see this old issue finally
implemented/fixed:
There can be only one alias this.
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6083
What
1. Allocator which preallocates a fixed amount of extra bytes for each
chunk, so that reallocations within that limit are guaranteed to be
in-place. Multiple reallocations should be supported, too, e.g. if the
limit is 10 it allocates 210 bytes when 200 are requested and then reallocs
200 - 205 -
On 11/27/2013 12:07 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
My conclusion after this whole discussion: in the short term we need to
have both Fedora and Debian builds. Then we'll move from there.
Right, different distributions = different shared libraries.
On 2013-11-29 18:03, thedeemon wrote:
This is pure Mac talk.
In Windows the native UI elements are so scarce and primitive, that
most apps with decent UI end up making their own. For example, one would
assume that UI elements that can be found in MS Office are native and
can be used in other
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 14:49:33 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 13:30:53 UTC, Luís Marques
wrote:
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 12:13:42 UTC, Chris wrote:
What I meant was no bindings to native widgets or other
toolkits. DWT (like SWT) uses the native widgets
Le 29/11/2013 03:00, Chris Cain a écrit :
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 01:44:34 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Still lacking proper beard ;)
A programmer without a beard! Blasphemy! Witch!
But anyway, going along with what you guys are saying, if you've ever
seen reviews on Android apps, a lot
Le 29/11/2013 14:31, Jacob Carlborg a écrit :
On 2013-11-28 21:54, Xavier Bigand wrote:
Yep, that the goal, having applications with a real personality. I don't
think it's an issue especially when application is full screen and
respect pictographs (icons and texts) standards,...
real
Le 29/11/2013 18:08, thedeemon a écrit :
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 20:55:02 UTC, Xavier Bigand wrote:
What is native on windows ?
- Win32
- Winforms
- Qt Widgets (that is near Win32)?
I would say Win32. Winforms is mostly a thin wrapper over Win32.
However things get more
Le 29/11/2013 04:48, Rikki Cattermole a écrit :
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 12:13:42 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 12:05:09 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-11-28 11:12, Chris wrote:
+1 GtkD Glade (UI builder) are very good (http://gtkd.org/).
Hopefully
one day
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 17:03:02 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 13:30:53 UTC, Luís Marques
wrote:
Whatever API / bindings you use, please don't expose
non-native UIs to users (drawn from scratch, either mimicking
the native UI or not). They never completely
I'm also waiting on D to address garbage collection better. As
has been brought up multiple times before (then quickly
forgotten), a @nogc attribute would do wonders for those D
programmers looking to avoid sneaky GC allocations. That's a
great start, and then we can work out how best to
On 11/29/13 9:03 AM, thedeemon wrote:
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 13:30:53 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
Whatever API / bindings you use, please don't expose non-native UIs to
users (drawn from scratch, either mimicking the native UI or not).
They never completely integrate with the OS, subtly
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 15:23:13 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 11/29/13 5:43 AM, Manu wrote:
* ARC
* rvalue - ref
* virtual-by-default
* GC improvements
* AA fixes
These are good themes but a conversation with one of the
bountysource founders revealed to me that smaller, precise
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 17:20:17 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 03:58:59 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
Has anyone else hit with Avast recognising Optlink as a
suspicious file since last update?
Since this spring I had issues when after linking my
dmd-compiled
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 23:46:02 UTC, Xavier Bigand wrote:
Le 29/11/2013 04:48, Rikki Cattermole a écrit :
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 12:13:42 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 12:05:09 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2013-11-28 11:12, Chris wrote:
+1 GtkD Glade
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 02:00:50 UTC, Chris Cain wrote:
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 01:44:34 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Still lacking proper beard ;)
A programmer without a beard! Blasphemy! Witch!
But anyway, going along with what you guys are saying, if
you've ever seen reviews
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 15:55:57 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:51:05 -, Peter Alexander
peter.alexander...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 09:39:57 UTC, Cooler wrote:
On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 08:48:03 UTC, Chris Cain wrote:
On Friday, 29
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
