Been meaning to respond to this for some time now, finally got
around to it. :)
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 00:59:45 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 18 March 2018 at 17:28, Joakim via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
Perhaps the community simply has different priorities than
you? For example, my Android port has n
On Tuesday, 27 March 2018 at 02:23:50 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I think that that we all agree that having these functions work
with CTFE would be great. The disagreement is mostly on how
much of an inconvenience it is or how big a deal that
inconvenience is.
Ultimately, it's just a questi
On Monday, March 26, 2018 16:26:38 Guillaume Piolat via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Saturday, 24 March 2018 at 16:37:06 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > I'm not sure why I seem to have to defend the idea that it's a
> > *great
> > thing* that D (in theory; according to the advertising
> > brochure) does
> > away
On 3/26/2018 9:26 AM, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
On Saturday, 24 March 2018 at 16:37:06 UTC, Manu wrote:
I'm not sure why I seem to have to defend the idea that it's a *great
thing* that D (in theory; according to the advertising brochure) does
away with these requirements.
Manu is not the only o
On Saturday, 24 March 2018 at 16:37:06 UTC, Manu wrote:
I'm not sure why I seem to have to defend the idea that it's a
*great
thing* that D (in theory; according to the advertising
brochure) does
away with these requirements.
Manu is not the only one who has to write such programs because
of
On 24 March 2018 at 18:10, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 3/24/2018 9:37 AM, Manu wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure why I seem to have to defend the idea that it's a *great
>> thing* that D (in theory; according to the advertising brochure) does
>> away with these requirements.
>
>
> It is in
On 3/24/2018 9:37 AM, Manu wrote:
I'm not sure why I seem to have to defend the idea that it's a *great
thing* that D (in theory; according to the advertising brochure) does
away with these requirements.
It is indeed a great idea. I'm just making the case that it isn't a blocker to
not have it
On 03/24/2018 12:37 PM, Manu wrote:
I understand table generation, that is the standard approach. It's
Huh? Then I guess I don't understand why you implied that the
alternative to CTFE was manually regenerating and copy-pasting tables:
>> On 3/23/2018 11:09 AM, Manu wrote:
>>> Like, in this
On 03/24/2018 09:53 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 01:42:56AM -0700, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
I can't recall ever seeing anyone else use this technique (other than
Nick!), but it works and isn't that bad.
It's not all that uncommon. I've worked with projects
On 2018-03-24 00:37, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
OAuth is a phisher's paradise.
But that aside, it's never made any sense to me for projects to
self-impose a policy of "If you've found a bug, and you're
non-registered, we don't want to hear about it."
I would think any self-respecting project wo
On 2018-03-23 20:25, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Really? I've dealt with relatively few projects that use github as a bug
tracker, and it's been my experience that most anything that's really
serious has its own bugtracker (usually some form of bugzilla) - though most
such projects predate github by
On 2018-03-23 13:34, bauss wrote:
What do you mean?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?component=c%2B%2B&product=gcc&resolution=---
That's only limited to 500, here's a list of 10 000:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?component=c%2B%2B&limit=0&order=bug_status%2Cpriority%2Cass
On 24 March 2018 at 01:42, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 3/23/2018 11:09 AM, Manu wrote:
>>
>> Like, in this particular project, being able to generate all tables at
>> compile time is the thing that distinguishes the D code from the C++
>> code; it's the *whole point*... If I have t
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 01:42:56AM -0700, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
> This file:
>
> https://github.com/dlang/dmd/blob/master/src/dmd/backend/optabgen.c
>
> computes tables, and writes several tables out to several .c files,
> which are then #include'd into the main build. It
On 3/23/2018 11:09 AM, Manu wrote:
Like, in this particular project, being able to generate all tables at
compile time is the thing that distinguishes the D code from the C++
code; it's the *whole point*... If I have to continue to generate
tables offline and paste big tables of data in the sourc
On 03/23/2018 02:09 PM, Manu wrote:
If I have to continue to generate
tables offline and paste big tables of data in the source code (and
then re-generate them manually when I change something); then
situation is identical to C++, therefore, stick with C++.\
WAT?
When in the world would anyon
On Saturday, March 24, 2018 00:39:03 Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Saturday, 24 March 2018 at 00:08:17 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > On Friday, March 23, 2018 23:37:18 Nick Sabalausky via
> >
> > Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >> I would think any self-respecting project would WANT
On Saturday, 24 March 2018 at 00:08:17 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, March 23, 2018 23:37:18 Nick Sabalausky via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
I would think any self-respecting project would WANT to lower
the barrier to being notified of problems, not put roadblocks
in the way: That's what out
On Friday, March 23, 2018 23:37:18 Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> I would think any self-respecting project would WANT to lower the
> barrier to being notified of problems, not put roadblocks in the
> way: That's what outsourced call centers are for!
Part of the problem with that is th
On Friday, 23 March 2018 at 20:38:38 UTC, Manu wrote:
I'm not suggesting switch to github. I've never suggested that.
I
understand it's inferior.
I'm suggesting supporting openauth.
OAuth is a phisher's paradise.
But that aside, it's never made any sense to me for projects to
self-impose a
. This was used
in the DMD build, and was gradually replaced with CTFE. It
still exists in the backend, which is still in C++.)
Right, but then there's no reason to use D.
Of course there is. It's called "all the other million things D
does better than C++ besides CTFE pow"
On 23 March 2018 at 12:16, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 3/23/2018 11:09 AM, Manu wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>
>
> You make some good points. The CTFE one is kinda inexcusable on our part,
> because it was trivial to implement (just more or less add some table
> entries and some glue copying
On Friday, 23 March 2018 at 20:48:07 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I have no idea whether any version of bugzilla supports it or
not.
- Jonathan M Davis
Mozilla's fork of Bugzilla (BMO) does - see
https://forum.dlang.org/post/tneyowfjewrlrtnqs...@forum.dlang.org
On 23.03.2018 20:02, Manu wrote:
Here's another one of these apparently trivial cases which is highly
likely to emerge for a new user (ie, has, in my experience, and I have
to 'explain' the situation, which is anti-merit):
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/8031
The language grammar has a nontri
On Friday, 23 March 2018 at 20:38:38 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 23 March 2018 at 12:25, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Friday, March 23, 2018 12:13:58 Manu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 23 March 2018 at 12:02, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 3/23/2018 11:14 AM, Manu wrote:
>
On Friday, March 23, 2018 13:38:38 Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 23 March 2018 at 12:25, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
>
> wrote:
> > On Friday, March 23, 2018 12:13:58 Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >> On 23 March 2018 at 12:02, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
On 23 March 2018 at 12:25, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Friday, March 23, 2018 12:13:58 Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> On 23 March 2018 at 12:02, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
>>
>> wrote:
>> > On 3/23/2018 11:14 AM, Manu wrote:
>> >> This happened to me again on Tuesday thi
On Friday, March 23, 2018 12:13:58 Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 23 March 2018 at 12:02, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
>
> wrote:
> > On 3/23/2018 11:14 AM, Manu wrote:
> >> This happened to me again on Tuesday this week...
> >
> > All bugzilla requires is a name and a password. It does not
On Friday, 23 March 2018 at 18:09:01 UTC, Manu wrote:
[snip]
Like, in this particular project, being able to generate all
tables at compile time is the thing that distinguishes the D
code from the C++ code; it's the *whole point*... If I have to
continue to generate tables offline and paste b
On 3/23/2018 11:09 AM, Manu wrote:
[...]
You make some good points. The CTFE one is kinda inexcusable on our part,
because it was trivial to implement (just more or less add some table entries
and some glue copying existing examples), and there were posts after posts here
and on bugzilla tal
On 23 March 2018 at 12:02, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 3/23/2018 11:14 AM, Manu wrote:
>>
>> I can echo this experience. I think only two colleagues (out of quite
>> a lot) of mine have ever created a bugzilla account.
>> Most of them get to the point where they see a website that
On 3/23/2018 11:14 AM, Manu wrote:
I can echo this experience. I think only two colleagues (out of quite
a lot) of mine have ever created a bugzilla account.
Most of them get to the point where they see a website that looks like
it's from the 90's and it wants you to create
yet-another-internet-a
On 23 March 2018 at 11:24, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 3/23/2018 8:15 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
>>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51664
>
>
> The money shot: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51664#c3
Thing is, C++ has nothing to prove; it's already accepte
On 3/23/2018 8:15 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51664
The money shot: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51664#c3
On 23 March 2018 at 03:16, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 3/17/2018 9:25 PM, Manu wrote:
>>
>> What is so hard about implementing a pow intrinsic that CTFE can use?
>
>
> https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/8071
Best PR this year!
>> It's one of those blocker bugs that's been there al
On 23 March 2018 at 02:37, Norm via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> Looking at bugzilla I see this is also now fixed but we were on 2.074 at the
> time. Sorry I don't have more specific details, it was hard enough just to
> get some devs to create bugzilla accounts let alone find existing tickets or
> ra
On 23 March 2018 at 01:36, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 03/23/2018 03:35 AM, Jordan Wilson wrote:
>>
>>
>> I suppose it's about finding that balance between growing the D user base,
>> and trying to get said user base to give back.
>>
>> Say I was offered a car with no
On 23.03.2018 13:06, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On Friday, 23 March 2018 at 09:37:26 UTC, Norm wrote:
I think the main reason for this is because they expect a C++/Python
like experience where your rarely hit a compiler/interpreter bug.
What happens if they found a bug in C++ or Python?
--
/Jacob
On Friday, 23 March 2018 at 09:37:26 UTC, Norm wrote:
I think the main reason for this is because they expect a
C++/Python like experience where your rarely hit a
compiler/interpreter bug.
Cheers,
Norm
What do you mean?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?component=c%2B%2B&product=gc
On Friday, 23 March 2018 at 09:37:26 UTC, Norm wrote:
I think the main reason for this is because they expect a
C++/Python like experience where your rarely hit a
compiler/interpreter bug.
What happens if they found a bug in C++ or Python?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 3/17/2018 9:25 PM, Manu wrote:
What is so hard about implementing a pow intrinsic that CTFE can use?
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/8071
It's one of those blocker bugs that's been there almost 10 years.
It's one that seems to engender lots of comments, but no action.
(BTW, there's a
On Sunday, 18 March 2018 at 04:25:48 UTC, Manu wrote:
What is so hard about implementing a pow intrinsic that CTFE
can use?
It's ridiculous that we can't CTFE any non-linear function...
It's one of those blocker bugs that's been there almost 10
years.
Well, there is this PR : https://github.c
On Friday, 23 March 2018 at 05:24:48 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/22/2018 9:15 PM, Norm wrote:
On Friday, 23 March 2018 at 03:28:05 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
What are the bugzilla issues on those?
This is just a few cut-paste from the collated list. Some were
reported but found later to be
On 03/23/2018 03:35 AM, Jordan Wilson wrote:
I suppose it's about finding that balance between growing the D user
base, and trying to get said user base to give back.
Say I was offered a car with no windscreen...I have 3 responses:
1. Cool! I'll put in a windscreen myself, as this car has a g
On Friday, 23 March 2018 at 01:49:30 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 03/22/2018 09:44 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, March 22, 2018 21:25:11 Nick Sabalausky via
Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 03/18/2018 11:43 PM, Norm wrote:
We don't want to be treated special. We don't want to g
On 3/22/2018 9:15 PM, Norm wrote:
On Friday, 23 March 2018 at 03:28:05 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
What are the bugzilla issues on those?
This is just a few cut-paste from the collated list. Some were reported but
found later to be duplicates, many were existing bugs, so no new bugzilla was
cr
On Friday, 23 March 2018 at 03:28:05 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/18/2018 7:56 PM, Norm wrote:
My workplace has stopped using D after a 6 month trial, which
finished in Jan 2018. Several developers did post here during
that period when blocked by a bug or incomplete feature, only
to be told
On 3/18/2018 7:56 PM, Norm wrote:
My workplace has stopped using D after a 6 month trial, which finished in Jan
2018. Several developers did post here during that period when blocked by a bug
or incomplete feature, only to be told if they want it fixed they can always
submit a PR.
What are th
On Friday, 23 March 2018 at 01:43:49 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 03/18/2018 11:28 PM, Manu wrote:
I know these feels so well.
People take their one experience, and that's the truth on the
matter.
The sad part is, it's actually a massive missed opportunity!
If these
colleagues po
On Friday, 23 March 2018 at 02:42:12 UTC, Manu wrote:
Small companies are often at a resource-shortage as it is...
they probably wouldn't be looking for potential productivity
increase opportunities (like using D instead of C) if that
wasn't the case.
IMO we need to be honest with them so th
On 22 March 2018 at 18:25, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 03/18/2018 11:43 PM, Norm wrote:
>>
>>
>> We don't want to be treated special. We don't want to give back. This is
>> the *entire* point.
>>
>
> An attitude like that and there's any wonder it didn't work out? Shee
On 03/22/2018 09:43 PM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
On 03/18/2018 11:28 PM, Manu wrote:
I know these feels so well.
People take their one experience, and that's the truth on the matter.
The sad part is, it's actually a massive missed opportunity! If these
colleagues posted here, and inste
On 03/22/2018 09:44 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, March 22, 2018 21:25:11 Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 03/18/2018 11:43 PM, Norm wrote:
We don't want to be treated special. We don't want to give back. This is
the *entire* point.
An attitude like that and there's any
On 03/18/2018 11:28 PM, Manu wrote:
I know these feels so well.
People take their one experience, and that's the truth on the matter.
The sad part is, it's actually a massive missed opportunity! If these
colleagues posted here, and instead were greeted by recognition of
their issue, and provided
On Thursday, March 22, 2018 21:25:11 Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 03/18/2018 11:43 PM, Norm wrote:
> > We don't want to be treated special. We don't want to give back. This is
> > the *entire* point.
>
> An attitude like that and there's any wonder it didn't work out? Sheesh.
>
>
On 03/18/2018 11:43 PM, Norm wrote:
We don't want to be treated special. We don't want to give back. This is
the *entire* point.
An attitude like that and there's any wonder it didn't work out? Sheesh.
This is the thing about OSS: The business willing to give back (and
there are many such
On 19 March 2018 at 13:00, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 2018-03-19 01:00, Manu wrote:
>
>> It's not aggression, it's a decade of compounded frustration.
>
>
> Perhaps you can give this a try:
> https://forum.dlang.org/thread/ojxxjixcxnztmssky...@forum.dlang.org
Haha. Yeah, mine wa
On 2018-03-19 01:00, Manu wrote:
It's not aggression, it's a decade of compounded frustration.
Perhaps you can give this a try:
https://forum.dlang.org/thread/ojxxjixcxnztmssky...@forum.dlang.org
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 05:27:20 UTC, Norm wrote:
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 04:15:26 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 19/03/2018 5:05 PM, Norm wrote:
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 03:53:07 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 19/03/2018 4:43 PM, Norm wrote:
[...]
You just said the magic word,
On 18 March 2018 at 21:34, bachmeier via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 01:15:28 UTC, Manu wrote:
>
>> Or hire staff who are paid to work on 'boring' issues. I would make
>> regular donations if I could be satisfied that my decade old issues would be
>> addressed. I wonder how
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 04:15:26 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 19/03/2018 5:05 PM, Norm wrote:
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 03:53:07 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 19/03/2018 4:43 PM, Norm wrote:
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 03:14:51 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
Did they at any point te
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 01:15:28 UTC, Manu wrote:
Or hire staff who are paid to work on 'boring' issues. I would
make regular donations if I could be satisfied that my decade
old issues would be addressed. I wonder how many others would
too?
That's actually possible now for corporate spo
On 19/03/2018 5:23 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, March 19, 2018 17:15:26 rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 19/03/2018 5:05 PM, Norm wrote:
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 03:53:07 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
You just said the magic word, medical.
D was never an appropriate fi
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 02:56:32 UTC, Norm wrote:
+1024 bytes
I think D is a terrific language worthy of all the praise it
gets and it is way way more stable than it was 3yrs ago. But
the attitude of submit a PR if you want it fixed works very
much against D. Like it or not these forums a
On Monday, March 19, 2018 17:15:26 rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 19/03/2018 5:05 PM, Norm wrote:
> > On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 03:53:07 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
> >> You just said the magic word, medical.
> >>
> >> D was never an appropriate fit here.
> >>
> >> dmd's backend
On 19/03/2018 5:05 PM, Norm wrote:
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 03:53:07 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 19/03/2018 4:43 PM, Norm wrote:
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 03:14:51 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
Did they at any point tell us that it was a blocker for your company
who was trialing D?
The volunteer line is fine for big picture stuff that is going to require a
lot of work and planing to get right. Using that for smaller feature
requests is going to give the impression that D is lacking in the technical
expertise to get anything done, It's often a sign that an open source
project
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 03:53:07 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 19/03/2018 4:43 PM, Norm wrote:
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 03:14:51 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
Did they at any point tell us that it was a blocker for your
company who was trialing D?
Because I do not remember once in t
On 19/03/2018 4:43 PM, Norm wrote:
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 03:14:51 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
Did they at any point tell us that it was a blocker for your company
who was trialing D?
Because I do not remember once in that time period of any one saying
this.
Walter has gone out of h
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 03:14:51 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
Did they at any point tell us that it was a blocker for your
company who was trialing D?
Because I do not remember once in that time period of any one
saying this.
Walter has gone out of his way in the past to help companies
On 18 March 2018 at 19:56, Norm via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 00:59:45 UTC, Manu wrote:
>>
>> On 18 March 2018 at 17:28, Joakim via Digitalmars-d
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Perhaps the community simply has different priorities than you? For
>>> example, my Android port has nev
On 19/03/2018 3:56 PM, Norm wrote:
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 00:59:45 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 18 March 2018 at 17:28, Joakim via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
Perhaps the community simply has different priorities than you? For
example, my Android port has never gotten much use either, which is
fine as
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 00:59:45 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 18 March 2018 at 17:28, Joakim via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
Perhaps the community simply has different priorities than
you? For example, my Android port has never gotten much use
either, which is fine as I primarily did that work for mysel
On Sunday, March 18, 2018 18:15:28 Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 18 March 2018 at 17:55, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
> > I definitely agree with this. If the folks fixing stuff don't have the
> > same priorities as you, then there's a high risk that what you want to
> > be fixed won't g
On 18 March 2018 at 18:50, rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 19/03/2018 2:38 PM, Manu wrote:
>>
>> On 18 March 2018 at 18:29, rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d
>>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 19/03/2018 2:21 PM, Manu wrote:
On 18 March 2018 at 18:11, rikki cattermole via Digi
On 19/03/2018 2:38 PM, Manu wrote:
On 18 March 2018 at 18:29, rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 19/03/2018 2:21 PM, Manu wrote:
On 18 March 2018 at 18:11, rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
For those not in the know, Manu is special.
He is in essence a use case for D him
On 18 March 2018 at 18:29, rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 19/03/2018 2:21 PM, Manu wrote:
>>
>> On 18 March 2018 at 18:11, rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> For those not in the know, Manu is special.
>>>
>>> He is in essence a use case for D himself.
>>>
>>> We
On 19/03/2018 2:21 PM, Manu wrote:
On 18 March 2018 at 18:11, rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
For those not in the know, Manu is special.
He is in essence a use case for D himself.
We really should be trying to make him happy in terms of blockers.
It's just good business sense.
Sha
On 18 March 2018 at 18:15, Manu wrote:
> On 18 March 2018 at 17:55, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
> wrote:
>> On Monday, March 19, 2018 00:28:15 Joakim via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>>> On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 00:08:58 UTC, Manu wrote:
>>> > On 18 March 2018 at 17:00, Manu wrote:
>>> >> [...
On 18 March 2018 at 18:11, rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> For those not in the know, Manu is special.
>
> He is in essence a use case for D himself.
>
> We really should be trying to make him happy in terms of blockers.
> It's just good business sense.
>
> Shame we can't throw money a
On 18 March 2018 at 17:55, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Monday, March 19, 2018 00:28:15 Joakim via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 00:08:58 UTC, Manu wrote:
>> > On 18 March 2018 at 17:00, Manu wrote:
>> >> [...]
>> >
>> > I want to just justify my apparent o
For those not in the know, Manu is special.
He is in essence a use case for D himself.
We really should be trying to make him happy in terms of blockers.
It's just good business sense.
Shame we can't throw money at him, he would have great ROI value.
On 18 March 2018 at 17:28, Joakim via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> Perhaps the community simply has different priorities than you? For example,
> my Android port has never gotten much use either, which is fine as I
> primarily did that work for myself.
>
> Nevertheless, you have to think of D as like
On Monday, March 19, 2018 00:28:15 Joakim via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 00:08:58 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > On 18 March 2018 at 17:00, Manu wrote:
> >> [...]
> >
> > I want to just justify my apparent over-reaction... I think I'm
> > not
> > the only one that feels this way fair
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 00:08:58 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 18 March 2018 at 17:00, Manu wrote:
[...]
I want to just justify my apparent over-reaction... I think I'm
not
the only one that feels this way fairly often.
Something that seems trivial only invokes over-reaction of this
nature
when
On 18 March 2018 at 17:00, Manu wrote:
> On 18 March 2018 at 02:19, Johan Engelen via Digitalmars-d
> wrote:
>> On Sunday, 18 March 2018 at 04:25:48 UTC, Manu wrote:
>>>
>>> What is so hard about implementing a pow intrinsic that CTFE can use?
>>> It's ridiculous that we can't CTFE any non-linear
On 18 March 2018 at 02:19, Johan Engelen via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Sunday, 18 March 2018 at 04:25:48 UTC, Manu wrote:
>>
>> What is so hard about implementing a pow intrinsic that CTFE can use?
>> It's ridiculous that we can't CTFE any non-linear function...
>> It's one of those blocker bugs t
On 18 March 2018 at 06:57, Rubn via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> There was a PR a while ago IIRC, it's probably one of those sitting at the
> back of the queue from 4 years ago or something.
Unacceptable if true.
On 18 March 2018 at 00:47, Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Sunday, 18 March 2018 at 04:25:48 UTC, Manu wrote:
>>
>> What is so hard about implementing a pow intrinsic that CTFE can use?
>> It's ridiculous that we can't CTFE any non-linear function...
>> It's one of those blocker bugs
On Sunday, 18 March 2018 at 04:37:32 UTC, ketmar wrote:
Manu wrote:
What is so hard about implementing a pow intrinsic that CTFE
can use?
It's ridiculous that we can't CTFE any non-linear function...
It's one of those blocker bugs that's been there almost 10
years.
nobody bothered. it is al
On Sunday, 18 March 2018 at 07:47:24 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Sunday, 18 March 2018 at 04:25:48 UTC, Manu wrote:
What is so hard about implementing a pow intrinsic that CTFE
can use?
It's ridiculous that we can't CTFE any non-linear function...
It's one of those blocker bugs that's been t
On Sunday, 18 March 2018 at 04:25:48 UTC, Manu wrote:
What is so hard about implementing a pow intrinsic that CTFE
can use?
It's ridiculous that we can't CTFE any non-linear function...
It's one of those blocker bugs that's been there almost 10
years.
It's been available in LDC since 1.6.0.
h
Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Sunday, 18 March 2018 at 04:25:48 UTC, Manu wrote:
What is so hard about implementing a pow intrinsic that CTFE can use?
It's ridiculous that we can't CTFE any non-linear function...
It's one of those blocker bugs that's been there almost 10 years.
Not all that much.
On Sunday, 18 March 2018 at 04:25:48 UTC, Manu wrote:
What is so hard about implementing a pow intrinsic that CTFE
can use?
It's ridiculous that we can't CTFE any non-linear function...
It's one of those blocker bugs that's been there almost 10
years.
Not all that much. Can you give me an exa
Manu wrote:
What is so hard about implementing a pow intrinsic that CTFE can use?
It's ridiculous that we can't CTFE any non-linear function...
It's one of those blocker bugs that's been there almost 10 years.
nobody bothered. it is all done by intercepting calls in CTFE engine (using
FQN man
What is so hard about implementing a pow intrinsic that CTFE can use?
It's ridiculous that we can't CTFE any non-linear function...
It's one of those blocker bugs that's been there almost 10 years.
On 12 January 2015 at 23:28, Manu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> Awesome. Really looking forward to this! :)
>
> On 13 January 2015 at 03:12, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
> wrote:
>> On 2 January 2015 at 14:19, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>> On 1 January 2015 at 18:40, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
>>> wro
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3749
On Thursday, 1 January 2015 at 16:56:24 UTC, Manu via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Does anyone know how to fix this? Can we please do so? It's
been a
problem for like 5 years it seems.
It's a bit insane that we can't resolve any non-linear
functions at
compile time.
Oh, we got yl2x recently [1].
So,
On 2015-01-01 17:59:09 +, Andrei Alexandrescu said:
Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Does anyone know how to fix this? Can we please do so? It's been a
problem for like 5 years it seems.
It's a bit insane that we can't resolve any non-linear functions at
compile time.
I've been hoping for t
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
