Hello Roman,
I guess you and I have massively different opinions on this because I see
it exactly the other way.
Still, every time two or more people decide to answer to the same
message, they inadvertently create new thread branches.
The linear mode prevents each reply from becoming it's o
On 2/6/2010 10:33 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> Roman Ivanov wrote:
>> In a tree-like forum, a discussion can be extended at any point, and the
>> bigger the thread grows, the more points there are. It's more difficult
>> to keep track of, and it's /much/ more difficult to see the "current"
>> state o
Hello Roman,
I disagree:
Here is why. A linear thread extends only at one point - messages are
added at the end.
I see this as a down side. That is because having messages only added at
the end means that the only information I get aside from the content is chronological
order. I can't see
Roman Ivanov wrote:
In a tree-like forum, a discussion can be extended at any point, and the
bigger the thread grows, the more points there are. It's more difficult
to keep track of, and it's /much/ more difficult to see the "current"
state of an entire discussion that you haven't read from the s
On 2/6/2010 5:33 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> Yigal Chripun wrote:
>> On 06/02/2010 23:42, Walter Bright wrote:
>>> Yigal Chripun wrote:
Walter, Please take a look at FUDForum.
>>>
>>> I did, thanks for the reference. I think reddit blows it away for user
>>> interface. Fudforum has the usual pr
retard wrote:
Any hacker can write a bot that posts spam on net. So they invented
CAPTCHA. Agreed, there's spam on newsgroups, too. I guess the largest
reason why these newsgroups have avoided all that is because Walter has
his private nntp server and nntp isn't widely used anymore.
We get sp
Sat, 06 Feb 2010 17:08:16 -0500, Roman Ivanov wrote:
> On 2/5/2010 11:52 AM, retard wrote:
>> The sad fact is that web forums are more or less a poor copy of the
>> good old usenet newsgroups. The new format requires more bandwidth and
>> server capacity
>
> That's a questionable statement. Yes,
retard wrote:
Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:20:51 +, BCS wrote:
Hello Gareth,
I actually like the newsgroup format (more than modern web forums) now
that I've gone to the trouble of setting up Thunderbrid but I guess
they did put me off initially.
Well, that's one data point for you.
I've said
Roman Ivanov wrote:
On 2/5/2010 11:52 AM, retard wrote:
The sad fact is that web forums are more or less a poor copy of the
good old usenet newsgroups. The new format requires more bandwidth and
server capacity
That's a questionable statement. Yes, in a forums you re-download the
same posts s
Yigal Chripun wrote:
On 06/02/2010 23:42, Walter Bright wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:
Walter, Please take a look at FUDForum.
I did, thanks for the reference. I think reddit blows it away for user
interface. Fudforum has the usual problem with web forums of using too
much vertical space, meanin
On 2/5/2010 11:52 AM, retard wrote:
> The sad fact is that web forums are more or less a poor copy of the
> good old usenet newsgroups. The new format requires more bandwidth and
> server capacity
That's a questionable statement. Yes, in a forums you re-download the
same posts several times. How
Hello Walter,
And if the throttle got stuck, I just step on the clutch & brake. BFD.
I was once chatting with some guys building a race car: in that class you
were required to have a gas peddle that had a toe strap and a push/pull cable
so, even if the throttle return spring got stuck, you c
On 06/02/2010 23:42, Walter Bright wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:
Walter, Please take a look at FUDForum.
I did, thanks for the reference. I think reddit blows it away for user
interface. Fudforum has the usual problem with web forums of using too
much vertical space, meaning you have a hard time
Hello Walter,
And if the throttle got stuck, I just step on the clutch & brake. BFD.
I was once chatting with some guys building a race car: in that class you
were required to have a gas peddle that had a toe strap and a push/pull cable
so, even if the throttle return spring got stuck, you c
Hello Walter,
BCS wrote:
If D were to quit providing a NNTP interface, I'd loose interest in
participating in these discussions. Heck, (HINT, HINT, HINT) the fact
that Tango has a forum rather than a news group is half or more of
the reason I don't use it.
I love the news interface, too, and
Yigal Chripun wrote:
Walter, Please take a look at FUDForum.
I did, thanks for the reference. I think reddit blows it away for user
interface. Fudforum has the usual problem with web forums of using too
much vertical space, meaning you have a hard time keeping track of where
you are in a thr
dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
I love the news interface, too, and see no reason to give it up. But the
web forums have their advantages, too. That's why I'd lik
On 2/6/2010 10:21 AM, dsimcha wrote:
> == Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
>> dsimcha wrote:
>>> == Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
I love the news interface, too, and see no reason to give it up. But the
web forums have their
Yigal Chripun writes:
> Walter, Please take a look at FUDForum. It's a web forum with NNTP
> support built in.
This mailing list is also hosted as a newsgroup on Gmane as
gmane.comp.lang.d.general¹
which you can read via NNTP and a Web-based interface.
Footnotes:
¹ http://dir.gmane.org/gm
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
> dsimcha wrote:
> > == Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
> >> I love the news interface, too, and see no reason to give it up. But the
> >> web forums have their advantages, too. That's why I'd like to
On 06/02/2010 15:23, Lutger wrote:
On 02/06/2010 01:58 PM, Yigal Chripun wrote:
...
Also, I've found a simple NNTP server written in python that has modular
back-end support so it can be set-up to provide a bi-directional NNTP
interface for various web forums.
What is the name / link?
Thank
On 02/06/2010 01:58 PM, Yigal Chripun wrote:
...
Also, I've found a simple NNTP server written in python that has modular
back-end support so it can be set-up to provide a bi-directional NNTP
interface for various web forums.
What is the name / link?
Thanks
On 06/02/2010 05:11, Walter Bright wrote:
BCS wrote:
If D were to quit providing a NNTP interface, I'd loose interest in
participating in these discussions. Heck, (HINT, HINT, HINT) the fact
that Tango has a forum rather than a news group is half or more of the
reason I don't use it.
I love th
Walter Bright Wrote:
> dsimcha wrote:
> > == Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
> >> I love the news interface, too, and see no reason to give it up. But the
> >> web forums have their advantages, too. That's why I'd like to have a
> >> system that is accessible from b
dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
I love the news interface, too, and see no reason to give it up. But the
web forums have their advantages, too. That's why I'd like to have a
system that is accessible from both. Post on the web forum, and it is
al
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
> I love the news interface, too, and see no reason to give it up. But the
> web forums have their advantages, too. That's why I'd like to have a
> system that is accessible from both. Post on the web forum, and it is
> also posted
retard wrote:
It's interesting to see that even though modern web page/app developers
have spent enormous effort on usability issues, techies still don't like
it. The sad fact is that web forums are more or less a poor copy of the
good old usenet newsgroups. The new format requires more bandwid
BCS wrote:
If D were to quit providing a NNTP interface, I'd loose interest in
participating in these discussions. Heck, (HINT, HINT, HINT) the fact
that Tango has a forum rather than a news group is half or more of the
reason I don't use it.
I love the news interface, too, and see no reason
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> - Actual user accounts. Anonymous reading/posting is great, and many web
> forums can still do that anyway, but they can also have real user accounts
> to, for example, prevent posters from pretending to be someone else. I
> rather like user profiles, too (although they'
"BCS" wrote in message
news:a6268fffef38cc745343a81...@news.digitalmars.com...
> Hello Gareth,
>
>
>> I actually like the newsgroup format (more than modern web forums) now
>> that I've gone to the trouble of setting up Thunderbrid but I guess
>> they did put me off initially.
>>
I had the same
Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:20:51 +, BCS wrote:
> Hello Gareth,
>
>
>> I actually like the newsgroup format (more than modern web forums) now
>> that I've gone to the trouble of setting up Thunderbrid but I guess
>> they did put me off initially.
>>
>> Well, that's one data point for you.
>>
>>
>
Hello Gareth,
I actually like the newsgroup format (more than modern web forums) now
that I've gone to the trouble of setting up Thunderbrid but I guess
they did put me off initially.
Well, that's one data point for you.
I've said it before, but I might as well say it again; I'm of the same
Mike Parker wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:
I've thought about building such a system for these forums many times.
Registration would not be required to post, but registering would
enable
features like voting on posts, establishing a profile, preferences,
etc.
That sounds a
"Daniel Keep" wrote in message
news:hkcsrv$2qi...@digitalmars.com...
>
>
> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "Bane" wrote in message
>> news:hkbqtb$rl...@digitalmars.com...
>>> Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
>>>
"Justin Johansson" wrote in message
news:hka8ju$1as...@digitalmars.com...
> Though,
>
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Bane" wrote in message
> news:hkbqtb$rl...@digitalmars.com...
>> Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
>>
>>> "Justin Johansson" wrote in message
>>> news:hka8ju$1as...@digitalmars.com...
Though,
admittedly, these days I find it boring to always lose against
modern ch
"Bane" wrote in message
news:hkbqtb$rl...@digitalmars.com...
> Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
>
>> "Justin Johansson" wrote in message
>> news:hka8ju$1as...@digitalmars.com...
>> > Though,
>> > admittedly, these days I find it boring to always lose against
>> > modern chess programs.
>>
>> That's one of
Hello Nick,
But then many of those people get confused and start thinking that
means censorship isn't censorship unless it's specifically a
government doing it, which of course is a load of bull.
OK, then if you want to call other things censorship (and you may well be
right to do so) I wil
Bane wrote:
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
"Justin Johansson" wrote in message
news:hka8ju$1as...@digitalmars.com...
Though,
admittedly, these days I find it boring to always lose against
modern chess programs.
That's one of the big reasons I lost interest in multiplayer FPSes. Getting
fragged every
On 03/02/2010 01:06, Walter Bright wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:
As I said before, you must be a much more tolerant person than I am :)
I have long experience with online flame wars. The only way to "win" at
them is to not play.
You are a webbudhist, Walter.
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
> "Justin Johansson" wrote in message
> news:hka8ju$1as...@digitalmars.com...
> > Though,
> > admittedly, these days I find it boring to always lose against
> > modern chess programs.
>
> That's one of the big reasons I lost interest in multiplayer FPSes. Getting
> fragg
"Mike Parker" wrote in message
news:hkbcjd$33...@digitalmars.com...
> dsimcha wrote:
>> == Quote from Jeff Nowakowski (j...@dilacero.org)'s article
>>> BCS wrote:
Group = citizens of china
controller = government of china
for the case in question (this NG)
group = pe
"Mike Parker" wrote in message
news:hkbc7f$2b...@digitalmars.com...
> Walter Bright wrote:
>> Yigal Chripun wrote:
I've thought about building such a system for these forums many times.
Registration would not be required to post, but registering would
enable
features like vot
dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Jeff Nowakowski (j...@dilacero.org)'s article
BCS wrote:
Group = citizens of china
controller = government of china
for the case in question (this NG)
group = people posting on NG
controller = people in NG wanting someone banned.
I see a difference
The governmen
Walter Bright wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:
I've thought about building such a system for these forums many times.
Registration would not be required to post, but registering would enable
features like voting on posts, establishing a profile, preferences, etc.
That sounds awesome. Another useful
On 03/02/2010 09:19, Lutger wrote:
On 02/03/2010 02:42 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:
I've thought about building such a system for these forums many times.
Registration would not be required to post, but registering would
enable
features like voting on posts, establishing a prof
Walter Bright wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:
As I said before, you must be a much more tolerant person than I am :)
I have long experience with online flame wars. The only way to "win" at
them is to not play.
What bothered me the most about his language was not the fact the it
was insulting
On 02/03/2010 02:42 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:
I've thought about building such a system for these forums many times.
Registration would not be required to post, but registering would enable
features like voting on posts, establishing a profile, preferences, etc.
That sounds
Hello dsimcha,
If noone reads it because you end up having to post it to alt.spam or something,
well, freedom of speech doesn't mean people have to listen to you if they
aren't
interested in what you have to say.
Vote++;
--
<
"Ary Borenszweig" wrote in message
news:hka9v2$1cr...@digitalmars.com...
> Walter Bright wrote:
>> BCS wrote:
>>> I think both of them are smart enough to figure out that if nobody here
>>> disagree with them, then they shouldn't waste there time talking with
>>> us.
>>
>> Well, it is boring to
On 02/02/2010 06:50 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
BCS wrote:
I think both of them are smart enough to figure out that if nobody
here disagree with them, then they shouldn't waste there time
talking with us.
Well, it is boring to talk to people who agree
Yigal Chripun wrote:
I've thought about building such a system for these forums many times.
Registration would not be required to post, but registering would enable
features like voting on posts, establishing a profile, preferences, etc.
That sounds awesome. Another useful feature would be stor
Yigal Chripun wrote:
As I said before, you must be a much more tolerant person than I am :)
I have long experience with online flame wars. The only way to "win" at
them is to not play.
What bothered me the most about his language was not the fact the it was
insulting but rather that it red
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
BCS wrote:
I think both of them are smart enough to figure out that if nobody
here disagree with them, then they shouldn't waste there time talking
with us.
Well, it is boring to talk to people who agree with you!
I agree.
(!)
Ali Çehreli wrote:
I used to never mistype those words until I learned that they were
pronounced differently.
Argh! I meant "... until I learned that they were pronounced _the_same_."
Ali
"maker of all mistakes"
Yigal Chripun wrote:
> This especially irks me every time I see a post that boils down to
> demeaning a non-native English speaker about using "your" instead of
> "you're"
I think that one is totally subconscious... For me at least... :)
As my native alphabet is phonetic, I used to read "your" a
On 03/02/2010 00:44, Walter Bright wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:
IMO, we should have a registration system for regular people, not for
censoring purposes but for keeping track.
there are many posts by different people that call themselves with the
same name and it seems confusing and unproductive
On 03/02/2010 00:41, Walter Bright wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:
He wouldn't even ban superdan, which frankly I would had i been in
Walter's shoes.
superdan was harmless. I enjoyed his rants, and underneath it he did
know what he was talking about.
As I said before, you must be a much more tol
Walter Bright wrote:
BCS wrote:
I think both of them are smart enough to figure out that if nobody
here disagree with them, then they shouldn't waste there time talking
with us.
Well, it is boring to talk to people who agree with you!
I agree.
Yigal Chripun wrote:
He wouldn't even ban superdan, which frankly I would had i been in
Walter's shoes.
superdan was harmless. I enjoyed his rants, and underneath it he did
know what he was talking about.
Yigal Chripun wrote:
IMO, we should have a registration system for regular people, not for
censoring purposes but for keeping track.
there are many posts by different people that call themselves with the
same name and it seems confusing and unproductive to me. people don't
have to register with
"Justin Johansson" wrote in message
news:hka8ju$1as...@digitalmars.com...
> Though,
> admittedly, these days I find it boring to always lose against
> modern chess programs.
That's one of the big reasons I lost interest in multiplayer FPSes. Getting
fragged every three seconds gets old fast. An
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:hka0h4$rl...@digitalmars.com...
> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "retard" wrote in message
>> news:hk9vgn$f4...@digitalmars.com...
>>> Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:20:19 -0500, Bane wrote:
>>>
>>>
> Except that you could argue that the government is censoring i
Walter Bright wrote:
BCS wrote:
I think both of them are smart enough to figure out that if nobody
here disagree with them, then they shouldn't waste there time talking
with us.
Well, it is boring to talk to people who agree with you!
And it's boring to always win.
Long time ago (before PC
BCS wrote:
I think both of them are smart enough to figure out that if nobody here
disagree with them, then they shouldn't waste there time talking with us.
Well, it is boring to talk to people who agree with you!
== Quote from Jeff Nowakowski (j...@dilacero.org)'s article
> BCS wrote:
> >
> > Group = citizens of china
> > controller = government of china
> >
> > for the case in question (this NG)
> >
> > group = people posting on NG
> > controller = people in NG wanting someone banned.
> >
> > I see a diffe
On 02/02/2010 23:05, Jeff Nowakowski wrote:
BCS wrote:
Group = citizens of china
controller = government of china
for the case in question (this NG)
group = people posting on NG
controller = people in NG wanting someone banned.
I see a difference
The government of China are Chinese people.
On 02/02/2010 21:47, retard wrote:
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:20:19 -0500, Bane wrote:
Except that you could argue that the government is censoring it for the
people, thereby making it an outside force imposing control on the
inside. Merriam-Webster's online definition would tend to go with the
whole
BCS wrote:
Group = citizens of china
controller = government of china
for the case in question (this NG)
group = people posting on NG
controller = people in NG wanting someone banned.
I see a difference
The government of China are Chinese people. I see no difference. Once
you create a "con
On 02/02/2010 21:09, dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from BCS (n...@anon.com)'s article
Hello Rainer,
BCS wrote:
Anything a group does to it's self is not censorship. Censorship is
where someone from the outside imposes controls.
By that definition, there is no censorship in China, because it's
som
Lionello Lunesu Wrote:
> On 31-1-2010 18:08, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> > We were (maybe) able to chase away
> > superdan,
>
> I miss superdan...
>
> L.
Heh, I couldn't care less about D, I'm only lurking this list only in the hope
of reading another post by superdan again !!
Daniel
Hello retard,
At least in this newsgroup it's easy to get into peoples' killfile.
Just disagree with your beloved deitys, Andrei and W.
I think both of them are smart enough to figure out that if nobody here disagree
with them, then they shouldn't waste there time talking with us.
--
<
Ali Çehreli wrote:
John D wrote:
What is your name and address?
I was considering about commenting on your missing identity.
If you want me to take you seriously, you must show me that you are
brave enough to use your real name. Only then you can start learning how
empty your self-proclaim
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"retard" wrote in message
news:hk9vgn$f4...@digitalmars.com...
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:20:19 -0500, Bane wrote:
Except that you could argue that the government is censoring it for the
people, thereby making it an outside force imposing control on the
inside. Merriam-Webste
retard wrote:
At least in this newsgroup it's easy to get into peoples' killfile.
You're not in mine, obviously!
"retard" wrote in message
news:hk9vgn$f4...@digitalmars.com...
> Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:20:19 -0500, Bane wrote:
>
>
>>> Except that you could argue that the government is censoring it for the
>>> people, thereby making it an outside force imposing control on the
>>> inside. Merriam-Webster's online
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:20:19 -0500, Bane wrote:
>> Except that you could argue that the government is censoring it for the
>> people, thereby making it an outside force imposing control on the
>> inside. Merriam-Webster's online definition would tend to go with the
>> whole "outside force" idea:
>>
Hello dsimcha,
== Quote from BCS (n...@anon.com)'s article
Hello Rainer,
BCS wrote:
Anything a group does to it's self is not censorship. Censorship is
where someone from the outside imposes controls.
By that definition, there is no censorship in China, because it's
something the group (
== Quote from BCS (n...@anon.com)'s article
> Hello Rainer,
> > BCS wrote:
> >
> >> Anything a group does to it's self is not censorship. Censorship is
> >> where someone from the outside imposes controls.
> >>
> > By that definition, there is no censorship in China, because it's
> > something the
Hello Rainer,
BCS wrote:
Anything a group does to it's self is not censorship. Censorship is
where someone from the outside imposes controls.
By that definition, there is no censorship in China, because it's
something the group (i.e. China) does to itself.
Group = citizens of china
contro
On 31-1-2010 18:08, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> We were (maybe) able to chase away
> superdan,
I miss superdan...
L.
>
> Except that you could argue that the government is censoring it for the
> people, thereby making it an outside force imposing control on the inside.
> Merriam-Webster's online definition would tend to go with the whole "outside
> force" idea: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/censor
Rainer Deyke wrote:
> BCS wrote:
>> Anything a group does to it's self is not censorship. Censorship is
>> where someone from the outside imposes controls.
>
> By that definition, there is no censorship in China, because it's
> something the group (i.e. China) does to itself.
>
>
Except that y
BCS wrote:
> Anything a group does to it's self is not censorship. Censorship is
> where someone from the outside imposes controls.
By that definition, there is no censorship in China, because it's
something the group (i.e. China) does to itself.
--
Rainer Deyke - rain...@eldwood.com
Yigal Chripun wrote:
Personally, I prefer paper for stuff that's meant for long-term use and
digital for one-offs. newspaper is a prime example of what not to do -
either you pollute by printing daily on new paper or you provide a
crappy experience with recycled paper. This is IMO a prime examp
On 01/02/2010 01:56, BCS wrote:
Hello Bane,
Lars T. Kyllingstad Wrote:
When TDPL is published D2 will be frozen. That's the whole point.
-Lars
Aha! What about... D3 ? :)
TDPL 2e
And FWIW, I'm in the lets kill trees camp.
p.s. Why doesn't anyone ever bring up the power requirements for
Hello Steve,
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
"TDPL: we want money"? Msg me when it is "TDPL: the well-oiled
machine". (Note I didn't say "the well-oiled MONEY machine).
Ordinarily I wouldn't think much of this, but considering some of
this guy's most recent postings over in "Google's Go", I'd say it'
"Steve Teale" wrote in message
news:hk6u43$1gq...@digitalmars.com...
> Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
>
>> > "TDPL: we want money"? Msg me when it is "TDPL: the well-oiled
>> > machine".
>> > (Note I didn't say "the well-oiled MONEY machine).
>> >
>>
>> Ordinarily I wouldn't think much of this, but cons
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
> > "TDPL: we want money"? Msg me when it is "TDPL: the well-oiled machine".
> > (Note I didn't say "the well-oiled MONEY machine).
> >
>
> Ordinarily I wouldn't think much of this, but considering some of this guy's
> most recent postings over in "Google's Go", I'd say i
Ali Ãehreli Wrote:
> Whatever ...
>
> Ali Ãehreli
> "a real name :p"
On a trivia note, I see that you real name does not have any of those silly
UTF-8 apology characters - congratulations.
John D wrote:
What is your name and address?
I was considering about commenting on your missing identity.
If you want me to take you seriously, you must show me that you are
brave enough to use your real name. Only then you can start learning how
empty your self-proclaimed C++ understanding
Hello Bane,
Lars T. Kyllingstad Wrote:
When TDPL is published D2 will be frozen. That's the whole point.
-Lars
Aha! What about... D3 ? :)
TDPL 2e
And FWIW, I'm in the lets kill trees camp.
p.s. Why doesn't anyone ever bring up the power requirements for reading
digital docs? Making a
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 16:27:39 +0100, Bane
wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad Wrote:
Bane wrote:
>> Why a killing of trees for a manual that changes daily and can be on
the
>> internet? What is the point of TDPL? To make money? I don't see any
value
>> in a set of pages that are a manual for a c
Lars T. Kyllingstad Wrote:
> Bane wrote:
> >> Why a killing of trees for a manual that changes daily and can be on the
> >> internet? What is the point of TDPL? To make money? I don't see any value
> >> in a set of pages that are a manual for a constantly changing and
> >> unestablished compute
Bane wrote:
Why a killing of trees for a manual that changes daily and can be on the
internet? What is the point of TDPL? To make money? I don't see any value
in a set of pages that are a manual for a constantly changing and
unestablished computer programming language. Can't yaz save the trees
"Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message
news:hk3kq6$268...@digitalmars.com...
> "John D" wrote in message
> news:hk381s$1es...@digitalmars.com...
>> Did anyone watch Shark Tank on TV this week? Captain Ice Cream was
>> rejected by all of the sharks and sent packing because he wanted to
>> sell a
"John D" wrote in message
news:hk381s$1es...@digitalmars.com...
> Did anyone watch Shark Tank on TV this week? Captain Ice Cream was
> rejected by all of the sharks and sent packing because he wanted to sell a
> franchise that wasn't. One of the sharks said to him something along the
> lines o
>
> Why a killing of trees for a manual that changes daily and can be on the
> internet? What is the point of TDPL? To make money? I don't see any value
> in a set of pages that are a manual for a constantly changing and
> unestablished computer programming language. Can't yaz save the trees an
Did anyone watch Shark Tank on TV this week? Captain Ice Cream was
rejected by all of the sharks and sent packing because he wanted to sell
a franchise that wasn't. One of the sharks said to him something along
the lines of, "a franchise offering is a package deal for a product that
is a well-o
98 matches
Mail list logo
