On 2012-01-25 18:07, Trass3r wrote:
Whats.necessary to use D in order to create C++ bindings ?
github.com/jacob-carlborg/dstep
I've released the first alpha/beta version:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/jt9i6l$2go5$1...@digitalmars.com
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 02:29:26 +0100
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for the long wait. Turns out I was *extremely* wrong about this.
Generating the D side turned out to be a hell of a lot more work then
I initially thought (mostly due to C++ and D type incompatibilities
On 03/16/2012 06:29 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
So, stay tight! Good times ahead.:)
Incredible good news! Thanks.
One of the very first wxD applications could be a GUI for the generator.
On 2012-03-17 04:34, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/17/12, Brad Andersone...@gnuk.net wrote:
Could the wxc generator be be used as a base for building bindings for
other libraries?
I hope it will be. It's kind of crazy that the first thing I'm using
it on is a huge library like wxD, this will
On 03/17/2012 09:50 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
This is why a proper compiler is needed, this will not work in the long
run.
Are you aware that doxgen's xml output is based on gcc-xml ?
I think it is necessary to say that doxygen, respective gcc-xml, is
working on stripped and annotated header
On 2012-03-17 18:36, bls wrote:
On 03/17/2012 09:50 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
This is why a proper compiler is needed, this will not work in the long
run.
Are you aware that doxgen's xml output is based on gcc-xml ?
No, I was not aware of that. What is the problem then, doxygen choking
on
On 03/17/2012 10:44 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-03-17 18:36, bls wrote:
On 03/17/2012 09:50 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
This is why a proper compiler is needed, this will not work in the long
run.
Are you aware that doxgen's xml output is based on gcc-xml ?
No, I was not aware of that.
On 03/17/2012 10:44 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
What is the problem then, doxygen choking on the XML or GCC choking on
the include files?
gcc-xml is stalled. Means newer C++ stuff is not supported.
See news...
http://www.gccxml.org/HTML/News.html
On 03/17/2012 10:51 AM, bls wrote:
Are you aware that doxgen's xml output is based on gcc-xml ?
I should be more carefull :( It's another wxWidgets utility that is
using gcc-xml.
On 3/17/12, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
This is why a proper compiler is needed, this will not work in the long run.
The generator doesn't really care which tool you use to extract the
data. It should be possible to use a tool such as LLVM to fill the
structs with all the information it
On 2012-03-17 20:20, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/17/12, Jacob Carlborgd...@me.com wrote:
This is why a proper compiler is needed, this will not work in the long run.
The generator doesn't really care which tool you use to extract the
data. It should be possible to use a tool such as LLVM to
On 2/11/12, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
The D classes
are not yet generated until I get wxc done, but wxc is 95% of the
source of difficulty. Generating wxd should be easy after that.
Sorry for the long wait. Turns out I was *extremely* wrong about this.
Generating the D
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2/11/12, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
The D classes
are not yet generated until I get wxc done, but wxc is 95% of the
source of difficulty. Generating wxd should be easy after that.
On 3/17/12, Brad Anderson e...@gnuk.net wrote:
Could the wxc generator be be used as a base for building bindings for
other libraries?
I hope it will be. It's kind of crazy that the first thing I'm using
it on is a huge library like wxD, this will likely be its biggest
unittest, so to speak. :p
On 2/11/12, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
132+ are left to go.
55 left. This is the harder part now since most of these left are
interface mismatches and not codegenerator bugs. As you can see I've
started filing reports with patches:
On 02/15/2012 06:53 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 2/11/12, Andrej Mitrovicandrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
132+ are left to go.
55 left. This is the harder part now since most of these left are
interface mismatches and not codegenerator bugs. As you can see I've
started filing reports with
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:53:32 +0100
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
55 left. This is the harder part now since most of these left are
interface mismatches and not codegenerator bugs. As you can see I've
started filing reports with patches:
All glory to you!
I see that
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:45:06 +0100
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
542 classes are successfully generated (and buildable). 132+ are left
to go.
Great!
I've ran into a few issues where the interface files (from which the
xml is built) are not in sync with the code. So there
On 2/11/12, bls bizp...@orange.fr wrote:
Silly Question .. did you try to to use regen (or however it is named)
script to re-create the doxygen xml files ?
That's what I do, yes. The wxPhp xml files were a little outdated anyway.
Another question regarding wxC. Will there be an option to
On 2/12/12, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
I saw your messages in wx-dev and wonder what will be the way to keep
those files in sync or, at least, detect there are inconsistencies?
They have a tool called ifacecheck which compares the xml files
generated by doxygen to the ones generated by using
On 02/12/2012 03:04 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
For wxc I'll have to provide both static and shared library support.
Perfect!
win32-only: I've tried statically linking 2.9.3 via optlink but it
couldn't handle the vast amount of symbol names. Even if that was
resolved (it won't be) I can't
Just a small update:
542 classes are successfully generated (and buildable). 132+ are left to go.
I've ran into a few issues where the interface files (from which the
xml is built) are not in sync with the code. So there might be missing
types definitions, or wrong types in methods, etc. But
On 2/11/12, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
542 classes
Sorry, when I said classes I meant wxc class wrappers. The D classes
are not yet generated until I get wxc done, but wxc is 95% of the
source of difficulty. Generating wxd should be easy after that.
On 02/11/2012 11:45 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Just a small update:
542 classes are successfully generated (and buildable). 132+ are left to go.
I've ran into a few issues where the interface files (from which the
xml is built) are not in sync with the code. So there might be missing
types
On 1/26/12, bls bizp...@orange.fr wrote:
Hi Andrej,
first of all : it is NOT my intention to pick on your nerves.
I am just curious and , ahem, a bit impatience.
Have you made some progress on the code generator ?
Are you running into problems, hard to solve problems ?
Well, it would be
On 27 January 2012 18:38, Kagamin s...@here.lot wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 January 2012 at 18:01:48 UTC, Zachary Lund wrote:
I do not mind using a C library in D because of how straight forward it
is. But simply mentioning C++ in D seems to add unneeded complexity which
should be avoided. I
On Monday, 6 February 2012 at 11:25:09 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
To be taken with a pinch of salt. I raised an eyebrow or two
when
looking at the estimated cost for GDC. ;-)
A C++ to D autoporter? That's an interesting idea.
On 02/06/2012 03:06 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 1/26/12, blsbizp...@orange.fr wrote:
Hi Andrej,
first of all : it is NOT my intention to pick on your nerves.
I am just curious and , ahem, a bit impatience.
Have you made some progress on the code generator ?
Are you running into problems,
On Mon, 6 Feb 2012 12:06:44 +0100
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm working on this around the clock. If everything goes ok I might
have the wxc wrapper done by the end of the week, but I'm not making
any promises.
Thank you very much for your efforts!!
I'd ask for a
So, I would not minimize the fact to get
stable/actively_developed/easily_maintained bindings for native
multi-platform GUI toolkit. ;)
Sincerely,
Gour
I just wonder dwt(http://www.dsource.org/projects/dwt) is not good enough?
Regards
Marton Papp
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:14:12 +0100
equi...@atw.hu wrote:
I just wonder dwt(http://www.dsource.org/projects/dwt) is not good
enough?
Well, I prefer wx over SWT and besides that, Jacob said he has other
higher priorities at the moment besides working on DWT.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
While
On 2012-01-28 12:47, Gour wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:14:12 +0100
equi...@atw.hu wrote:
I just wonder dwt(http://www.dsource.org/projects/dwt) is not good
enough?
Well, I prefer wx over SWT and besides that, Jacob said he has other
higher priorities at the moment besides working on DWT.
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:12:57 +0100
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
That doesn't stop others to work on DWT :)
Of course, but we don't need new forces joining forking.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
As fire is covered by smoke, as a mirror is covered by dust,
or as the embryo is covered by the
On 01/28/2012 03:47 AM, Gour wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:14:12 +0100
equi...@atw.hu wrote:
I just wonder dwt(http://www.dsource.org/projects/dwt) is not good
enough?
Well, I prefer wx over SWT and besides that, Jacob said he has other
higher priorities at the moment besides working on
On 01/28/2012 07:12 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
That doesn't stop others to work on DWT :)
No offense Jacob!
It is just that imo wxWidgets is the most flexible gui toolkiy in town.
and reading what is planned for 3.0 yum iOS.. maybe AndroidBut
despite that, DWT requires Java like
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:18:10 +0100
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, the XML parsing script is done and I've verified it has the
same output as the php script. This thing parsed about 1400 xml files,
so I don't see any issues with parsing doxygen xml files with a
On 1/27/12, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
Andrej, you're the bearer of the best D-news these days. Congrats!!!
I appreciate the enthusiasm, but I think it should be toned down a
bit. At this stage this work is pretty insignificant compared to all
the work on e.g. improving DMD.
On 2012-01-27 08:48, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 1/27/12, equi...@atw.huequi...@atw.hu wrote:
It is not clear what you do not use xml in tango library.
I'm using D2, not D1.
Tango is working find with D2: https://github.com/SiegeLord/Tango-D2
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:29:43 +0100
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
I appreciate the enthusiasm, but I think it should be toned down a
bit. At this stage this work is pretty insignificant compared to all
the work on e.g. improving DMD.
I'm aware that the folks working on
On 1/27/12, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
Tango is working find with D2: https://github.com/SiegeLord/Tango-D2
It wasn't the first place I went looking for an xml lib since this
port is pretty new. But I did hear Tango's xml parser was blazing
fast.
On 2012-01-27 12:21, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 1/27/12, Jacob Carlborgd...@me.com wrote:
Tango is working find with D2: https://github.com/SiegeLord/Tango-D2
It wasn't the first place I went looking for an xml lib since this
port is pretty new. But I did hear Tango's xml parser was blazing
On Wednesday, 25 January 2012 at 18:01:48 UTC, Zachary Lund wrote:
I do not mind using a C library in D because of how straight
forward it is. But simply mentioning C++ in D seems to add
unneeded complexity which should be avoided. I think the answer
to a question such as What's the
What's the alternative to Qt in D? should not be Qt bindings but
maybe a library which imitates the implementation and/or interface of
Qt UI widgets in native D.
http://www.ohloh.net/p/qt/estimated_cost
some scary numbers
http://www.ohloh.net/p/qt5
dmd could really learn a thing or two
Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 January 2012 at 18:01:48 UTC, Zachary Lund wrote:
I do not mind using a C library in D because of how straight forward
it is. But simply mentioning C++ in D seems to add unneeded complexity
which should be avoided. I think the answer to a question such as
What's
Are the Clang C bindings complete? I imagine they don't get
that much attention.
It depends on what complete means. If you mean that you can do
all the things you can do with the C++ API, then no. If you
mean it's complete enough to implement this project, then I
don't know. I think at least
On 2012-01-26 13:24, Trass3r wrote:
Are the Clang C bindings complete? I imagine they don't get that much
attention.
It depends on what complete means. If you mean that you can do all the
things you can do with the C++ API, then no. If you mean it's complete
enough to implement this project,
On 01/25/2012 01:38 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
The Json parsing I've initially attempted was a mistake. I've assumed
the XML parsing would be harder than necessary, but I ended up
fighting wxPhp's arbitrary Json output (arrays holding objects of
different types.. which is no good for D, or my
On Thursday, 26 January 2012 at 15:13:57 UTC, bls wrote:
Andrej,
I can't await your SUCCESS message. For me your upcoming code
is the most important stuff since years.
A few questions : where do I find Vladimir Panteelev's XML
library ? Does this library support XPATH ?
I don't know
On Thursday, January 26, 2012 19:44:18 Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Thursday, 26 January 2012 at 15:13:57 UTC, bls wrote:
Andrej,
I can't await your SUCCESS message. For me your upcoming code
is the most important stuff since years.
A few questions : where do I find Vladimir Panteelev's XML
On 1/26/12, bls bizp...@orange.fr wrote:
A few questions : where do I find Vladimir Panteelev's XML library ?
https://github.com/CyberShadow/ae/blob/master/utils/ (see xml.d)
Does this library support XPATH ?
I'm not sure. It's a light-weight library, you're probably not going
to see libxml2
On Thursday, 26 January 2012 at 19:02:30 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
xmlp is the one that Tomaz is working on to replace std.xml,
correct? Any idea how close it is to actually being submitted
for review?
- Jonathan M Davis
Michael Rynn, no I don't know what Tomaz is up to. Maybe some
form
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:18:10 +0100, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/26/12, bls bizp...@orange.fr wrote:
A few questions : where do I find Vladimir Panteelev's XML library ?
https://github.com/CyberShadow/ae/blob/master/utils/ (see xml.d)
Does this library support
On 1/27/12, equi...@atw.hu equi...@atw.hu wrote:
It is not clear what you do not use xml in tango library.
I'm using D2, not D1.
On 01/25/2012 09:07 AM, Trass3r wrote:
Whats.necessary to use D in order to create C++ bindings ?
github.com/jacob-carlborg/dstep
Quote
DStep is a tool for converting C and Objective-C headers to D modules.
Well THAT'S nitty gritty :)
C++ as well ? How ? And maybe the most imp[ortant
I have to say that I am very disappointed regarding the feedback I got
from from my wxWidgets good news message.
Here is a historical chance to enhance D's spectrum in a way that has
been pipe-dream just a few month ago and the community feedback is : )
we are busy with optimizing bla bla.
Whats.necessary to use D in order to create C++ bindings ?
github.com/jacob-carlborg/dstep
On 01/25/2012 11:41 AM, bls wrote:
On 01/25/2012 09:07 AM, Trass3r wrote:
Whats.necessary to use D in order to create C++ bindings ?
github.com/jacob-carlborg/dstep
Quote
DStep is a tool for converting C and Objective-C headers to D modules.
Well THAT'S nitty gritty :)
C++ as well ? How
On 01/25/2012 10:01 AM, Zachary Lund wrote:
On 01/25/2012 11:41 AM, bls wrote:
On 01/25/2012 09:07 AM, Trass3r wrote:
Whats.necessary to use D in order to create C++ bindings ?
github.com/jacob-carlborg/dstep
Quote
DStep is a tool for converting C and Objective-C headers to D modules.
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:44:43 -0800
bls bizp...@orange.fr wrote:
Unfortunately I am not a student anymore instead I am a unhappy tax
payer.
Same here.
To fulfill my Job I need GUI,RIA(WEB), Database and XML(SOAP)
support.
I need GUI Database support, but not for the job, but for a
On 2012-01-25 18:41, bls wrote:
On 01/25/2012 09:07 AM, Trass3r wrote:
Whats.necessary to use D in order to create C++ bindings ?
github.com/jacob-carlborg/dstep
Quote
DStep is a tool for converting C and Objective-C headers to D modules.
Well THAT'S nitty gritty :)
C++ as well ? How ?
On 2012-01-25 20:13, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-01-25 18:41, bls wrote:
On 01/25/2012 09:07 AM, Trass3r wrote:
Whats.necessary to use D in order to create C++ bindings ?
github.com/jacob-carlborg/dstep
Quote
DStep is a tool for converting C and Objective-C headers to D modules.
Well
On 01/25/2012 11:06 AM, Gour wrote:
After researching a lot, I believe that wxWidgets is the best solution
for multi-platform development and I'll try to help as much as possible
those people trying to make it happen.
Sinvcerely,
Gour
Hi Gour thanks for the feedback,
Indeed.
wxWidgets in
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:26:34 -0800
bls bizp...@orange.fr wrote:
wxWidgets in 2.9.3 has closed the gap to QT. (webkit, f.i.) The
documentation is also very close to what QT has to offer thanks to
Doxygen.
Let's hope 3.0 will polish it even further.
I wonder how much sense it would make
The Json parsing I've initially attempted was a mistake. I've assumed
the XML parsing would be harder than necessary, but I ended up
fighting wxPhp's arbitrary Json output (arrays holding objects of
different types.. which is no good for D, or my sanity).
Yesterday I've started working on xml
I'm trying to reimplement the code as a separate tool in D using the
Clang C bindings. So far it's not working out that well, there's not
much documentation available.
Are the C bindings complete? I imagine they don't get that much attention.
Whats.necessary to use D in order to create C++ bindings ?
I forgot SWIG.
On 01/25/2012 12:44 PM, bls wrote:
On 01/25/2012 10:01 AM, Zachary Lund wrote:
On 01/25/2012 11:41 AM, bls wrote:
On 01/25/2012 09:07 AM, Trass3r wrote:
Whats.necessary to use D in order to create C++ bindings ?
github.com/jacob-carlborg/dstep
Quote
DStep is a tool for converting C and
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 22:38:58 +0100
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Andrej,
Yesterday I've started working on xml parsing instead (using Vladimir
Panteelev's xml library) and now I have a full script that parses wx
doxygen files in pretty much the same way as the wxPhp
On 2012-01-25 22:38, Trass3r wrote:
I'm trying to reimplement the code as a separate tool in D using the
Clang C bindings. So far it's not working out that well, there's not
much documentation available.
Are the C bindings complete? I imagine they don't get that much attention.
It depends on
69 matches
Mail list logo
