Yes you must buy a box to play the mode.
What did you do before the sound card?
Maybe watch your corn grow.
As far as the email comment, I can tell you have
not seen to much if any of the pactor or packet
traffic of late. Just going on what other have said.
John
At 01:30 PM 3/2/2008, you wrote
something a little faster than regular MFSK for a
robust mode
John
VE5MU
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of kh6ty
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2008 4:18 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Keeping NBEMS in
you know what Patrick? it works really, really well and can live with the
GUI however you want it.
John
VE5MU
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick Lindecker
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2008 1:59 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re
true John, but function beats pretty most of the time..
"As far as FAE400 goes, I would like to try it. Too bad one
can only get it from one source. (gee that kind of makes it
just like pactor 3. I don't hear any anyone screaming bloody
murder about that.) Multipsk may be a
? If it was my software
I think I would have a drop down window to pick the mode
of operation. And only what was needed for that mode would
be on that screen.
Yeah I know - that's just my option. Everyone has one. And
I'm sitting on mine.
John, W0JAB
in the center of fly over country
d our own way with a frequency
that is relatively clear and useable.
John
VE5MU
VE5GPM has moved to 40M , 7089.0 USB for further testing , and will be
running either RFSM8000, non-standard modulation, or
ALE400.
Station is on 24/7 so please try a connect
John
VE5MU
VE5GPM beaconing on 14109.5 , 5 minute intervals until 20:00UTC , beam
pointed south east
VE5MU listening 14109.5, ready for connect until 20:00 utc
John
VE5MU
RTTY for one.
And a boat load of others.
At 08:43 AM 2/15/2008, you wrote:
>Besides PSK31 & 63, what other modes can be decoded with a 300hz
>filter? Isn't MFSK16 just a little too wide?
>Ben,K4GST
Mike you may like to try YAPP.
It's a all around TNC DOS based terminal program.
Split screen - and all that.
I think it's still in the files area of this list. If not I will
add it again. I have been using it since the mid 1980's
on PK-232, KAM-XL as well as the SCS PTC-IIex.
Joh
It once was very easy to copy RTTY when *everyone* used
2125 and 2295 Hz tones. Then came the 200 Hz shift TNC's
and now you have sound cards and people that are up side
down with their tones. And please don't get me started on
no CR/LF after 70 or charters.
Sitting on a center frequency of 7078.9.
After you came up with the idea Sholto, I was fooling around with Rtty and
Olivia 250/2, and they are very close to the same speed.
MixW has 250/2 , so was playing with it.
It would be interesting to see which would do better under poor conditions,
which are the norm lately
John
VE5MU
Good idea, Sholto;
so, do you want to try this somewhere? 30m has been good for us in the past
John
VE5MU
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sholto Fisher
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 10:37 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject
heard your second connect as well,
as a suggestion make sure that the receive on your rig is as wide as
possible , 3khz or better
John
VE5MU
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 4:34 PM
To
technically Canada allows voice on 14070, or anywhere else for that matter.
in practice hams here follow the region 2 bandplan, although not mandatory
suspect there are a number of other countries who do not specifiy mode
John
VE5MU
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto
@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 1:44 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RFSM8000
Hi John,
Using RFSM 2400, I was able to connect with the non standard mode, but
had to go to 50 watts, and initially
hour test on the same
frequencies.
John
VE5MU
Speaking of, I (and others) sure wish when writing RTTY
software you developers would add or force a CR/LF
after 70 charters.
I really don't think the glass operators would notice or mind.
And us using paper would notice the most since we
would not get the "pile up" at the end of a line.
ARRL b
administrative judges
have the authority to answer these questions.
73,
John
KD6OZH
ahh I am of "that certain age" but UI could also apply to me as
(u)n(i)tiated hi hi
tnx Simon
John
VE5MU
User Interface, also known as GUI (Graphical User Interface) when compared
with an old VT-100 type terminal interface or even a teletype for those of a
&#
well said, Dmitry
John
VE5MU
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of dmitry_d2d
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 10:47 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: RFSM 8000
3 . There are several remarks on the open source codes
qu'est-ce que "UI"?
John
VE5MU
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Simon Brown
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 2:00 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK
To be able
and have not tried again since.
John, W0JAB
At 09:23 PM 1/30/2008, you wrote:
>--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Sholto Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> MultiPSK has a lot more in it than just the ALE Frank.
>
>That's cool, and I can appreciate that. I'
To answer that in one word, no.
Ain't going to happen.
The reason so so many use the sound card modes right now
is because they don't have to *buy* some black box to do it.
John, W0JAB
At 08:49 PM 1/30/2008, you wrote:
>I know just about everybody does MT63 on a soundcard. I
minutes, 15 seconds
Surprised that MFSK is a little faster than PSK31 and works better under
the generally poor conditions we have lately
John
VE5MU
The standard shows multiple bit rates (3200, 4800, 6400, 8000 and 9600 bps),
but all at 2400 Baud (symbols per second).
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: "Leskep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 22:38 UTC
Subject: Re: [digitalradio]
>From what I've seen, it implements MIL-STD-188-110B appendix C which
operates at 2400 baud. It can be used in the HF phone/image segments for
digital voice and facsimile and above 50.1 MHz for any purpose.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew O'Brien&
of ALE400, and an
improved connection to the internet email over that presently offered with
RFSM8000 .
Both Patrick and Dmitry are pretty talented individuals. would be nice to
see their directions converge into one super piece of software.
John
VE5MU
I was in a similar boat Rick. Still have the P38 card sitting around
somewhere, I found the instruction book as well the other day. B-)
73, John de VK2XGJ
One of the reasons politicians try so hard to get themselves re-elected,
because they couldn&#
At 05:38 PM 1/27/2008, you wrote:
>But, we want you to *read* about it first, John! :-)
Oh I see, you have no one of them READ-ME-FIRST files.
w.your-site.com/nbms/download
Really it's like saying you can see my tax return for 2006 at
http://www.irs.gov
spending your next lifetime searching for it.
John, W0JAB
Been listening for a while now.
At 17:12:25Z there was 3 transmitting at the same time.
I saw that a couple of weeks ago Simon."Shocked" is just one of the
words that I thought when I saw it. B-)
73, John de VK2XGJ
One of the reasons politicians try so hard to get themselves re-elected,
because they couldn't live
Many thanks Andy. Ahhh but if it is too cold you can always put on another
jumper or move closer to the fire.
If it is 120 Deg' Farenheight (sp?) and you are in the nude, you can't
take anymore clothes off can you?
73, John de VK2XGJ
One of t
At 08:58 AM 1/24/2008, you wrote:
>You really need to grow up, John. If you have personal problems, solve
>them, but how about keeping them off the forum.
Really Roger after this comment :
" I doubt you do much digital communications at all, John.
I know that I never run across
.
At 10:45 PM 1/23/2008, you wrote:
>Hi John
>
>At 0442Z the WD8DHF PMBO in Harker Hts, TX just started transmitting
>with an S9 signal. It is sending a Solar Flux Index accompanied by a
>cautionary request for users to LISTEN first before transmitting or
>losing privilege
Looking for P1 connect and Roger.
change modes and change software, but I cannot change
frequencies. A new TS480SAT has been ordered, which will correct that
problem, and should be available for install within the next few weeks.
John
VE5MU
e switches. New
analog oscillcopes are about $500 and the low end of the Agilent and Tektronix
product lines is now $1000.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: Tooner
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 05:47 UTC
Subject: [digitalradio] bee
Would there really be a problem if it is wider then
500Hz?
John
At 07:32 PM 1/21/2008, you wrote:
>When I look at MP73-N in the MMSSTV waterfall while TX button is
>pressed, I see that the vast majority of the spectrum display is within
>500 Hz (1900 to 2300)but I count 16 brief burs
OK. I have the MDS product (QEDesign 1000) and could compare the coefficients
generated if that helps.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: Simon Brown
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 18:21 UTC
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] FIR Filters
A third party DFT implementation should prove that the coefficients aren't
completely incorrect. Beyond that, wouldn't it be more useful to feed the
filter design parameters into another implementation of the Remez exchange
algorithm and compare the results?
73,
John
KD6OZH
Since the filter coefficients are the impulse response, you should be able to
do a DFT of the coefficients to get the frequency response.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: Simon Brown
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January
VE5GPM beaconing on 14103.0 Mil Std Modulation, interval 60 seconds
beacon started at 1630Z . please try a connect, or signal reports to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] , put VE5MU as the first word in the "subject"
line.
Thanks
John
VE5MU
at Europe. While there is full remote access for
the software, there is no computer control for the rig (TS-850) . Within 30
days this rig will be replaced by a TS-480SAT with full
computer control .
This station will also run ALE400 from time to time.
John
VE5MU
Good deal Howard.
Really did enjoy the QSO this afternoon.
But I keep hearing from this guy out on the left cost that
KB2KB P1 is dead.
John, W0JAB
No not a thing wrong with it.
I would just like someone to get the credit for it since
there was no name or call in either the email address or
any place else.
Thanks, again Frank.
John, W0JAB
co-moderator.
At 07:07 PM 1/17/2008, you wrote:
>--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Joh
at 20:00Z
Beaconing 14103.0 RFSM8000, non-standard modulation , 60sec intervals, for
the next 2 hours
John
VE5MU
On my 2nd call of CQ when the rig un-keyed after the CW ID
there was N4X something or-other calling CQ with HELL.
I did not have to tune a bit to copy him. Just plug the audio
into the laptop.
At that point I called it a night and went up front to the living
room to read a bit.
John
At 11:03 PM
tors are robots stations
and MANY can't see that for some reason.
I really don't done know what to say other than that.
John, W0JAB
At 09:16 PM 1/16/2008, you wrote:
>Hello John,
>
>Well I have seen no others, aside from you, complaining about qrm when
>operating Pactor modes
ignored
At 08:42 PM 1/16/2008, you wrote:
>test
got it...
Calling CQ 7077.7LSB Pactor one at this time.
Looking for W6VZV
and QRZ DX
So tell me (and others) how someone operating a mode with
a waterfall display and seeing a signal (so be it a pactor signal)
QRM that ongoing keyboard to keyboard QSO?
It seems to be that *any* pactor signal is fair game for anyone
that *only* knows that is a pactor signal to QRM it.
John
> File: /psk31_tips.pdf
> Uploaded by : valuedprofile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Description : Tips on using PSK31
Would someone like to step up and take credit for this?
John, W0JAB
Gee I did no make the list.
* copied any of this traffic and are
just going by what you read or have been told? That's too bad because
neither have the people you have been listing too.
John, W0JAB
This is not new in any way Jim.
Just a few weeks Tony, K2MO was in a QSO on 7077.5
Pactor and someone started calling CQ and then just
sent trash. I did sent a email. His reply was (as it always is)
" I was thinking it was a PMBO station" .
John, W0JAB
At 01:51 PM 1/14/2008, you wr
>I'm still trying for W0JAB (John) and you, of course. I've heard no signal
>from you whatsoever to date, same think for W0JAB. I'm still trying
>and I'm sure the effort will pay off before long.
Howard - when I call out a dial frequency for pactor such
as the
to have member countries accept the band plan as
written, and to enact a set of bandwidth-based regulations which would
enforce this plan? "
John
VE5MU
At 07:29 PM 1/13/2008, you wrote:
>
>John, do you really characterize the innovation that's been driving the
>development of new digital modes as "madness"? Do you really think that the
>explosion of soundcard digital mode users is "the problem".
No I don
Comments in line
>Your problem, John, is that you are unable to stick to an argument of
>the issues. Instead, everything becomes personal with you as evidenced
>by the above ad hominem remarks. Disappointing.
Wrong again Roger.
I do pactor as well as RTTY and Amtor.
I can copy eac
Sorry about the bandwidth.
"Stop the madness!" how?
Programmers love changing programs.
As always flames to me, respectful and clean posts to the reflector.
73 ES CUL
==
Mr. John R. Klim II
N3KHK
ARRL LM-0008416263, AMSAT LM-2187
At 06:31 PM 1/13/2008, Chuck Mayfield wrote in part:
>So, why is this group beating on PACTOR? It provides a
>public service.
First you must got to ask - was this a problem before the
sound cards modes?
ANSWER: no.
I'm all for new ARQ modes that work as well as Amtor or Pactor.
But let one
At 08:14 AM 1/13/2008, you wrote:
> Twice in the last seven days
>I have had QSOs disrupted by a Pactor Winlink station firing up on top
>of my QSO. Fortunately, both times I turned the power way up (from
>about 40 watts to 200 watts) and we were able to work through it.
Roger - how do you k
At 08:05 AM 1/13/2008, you wrote:
>This is getting ridiculous! It takes me nearly 10 seconds to say
>"This is AA5J Is the frequency in use?"
In what mode?
y , in the past I have told you guys at least 20 million times not to
exaggerate..
John
VE5MU
At 09:48 PM 1/10/2008, you wrote:
>
>Chris , ZL1BOE
>
>you will be told by others that ALE is widely
>used to set up QSO's and QSY's using the one
>line m
s, both digital and voice.
OK guys, flame me if you wish. They won't clutter my mail box.
73 to all. Truly. Nothing personal, Andy. See you all on the digital modes.
John Hirth W2KI
aven't tried it, but is something we
can run here in Canada on most bands except 30m.( bandwidth issues rather
than speed) It apparently has the ability to pass traffic to and from the
internet from HF, using a sound card modem.
So much software, so little time
73's John
VE5MU
Hi John, I've often wondeered why I only see stns from Europe and not the
USA. I agree that 30Mx is a fascinating band, a lot like 6Mx only more
fun. B-)
The Call is VK2XGJ not T.
73, John de VK2XGJ
One of the reasons politicians try so hard t
in the evenings
to see what the propagation really does.
The 30M spotting page can be found at http://www.projectsandparts.com/30m/
John
VE5MU
Here is Missouri we have 114 counties plus the city of St. Louis.
Each and ever county plus the city of St. Louis puts money into
their EOC. I know of none that does not have ham equipment.
And has been doing so for many many years.
Would that be any thing like you what your talking about?
Maybe a
Right. and for the newer no code hams this will help how?
At 04:18 PM 1/6/2008, you wrote:
>IDing in CW has the benefits that its universally understood, requires no
>decoding software, and is trivial to implement.
>
>73,
>
>Dave, AA6YQ
>
Sorry I was not ably to jump in on this.
I have been just to busy trying to get things ready to sell
my company.
What frequency have they been running this on?
And what time of the day or evening.
John
for brief periods for experimental purposes."
Should that not read " appear to be illegal operations if they are being run
unattended "
I think we all know that you *CAN'T* run a unattended station.
John
sted in further experiments and look forward to meeting anyone
interested on 80-20M
John
VE5MU
It is one thing to be " automatic " and " attended "
and another to be " automatic " and " unattended ".
The rules say you can't be " unattended "
At 11:19 AM 1/5/2008, you wrote:
>A station transmitter without a homo sapiens located at a receiver *at
>the location of the receiver* is
Couldn't quite cut it from Sarasota, FL, Andy. Thanks for trying. I'll
be beaconing near you.
John W2KI
At 09:21 AM 1/5/2008, you wrote:
>I beacon with a ARQ'd PSK63 signal on 30M this morning and Skip KH6TY
>(in 4-land) connected with me
Where you at on 30M Andy?
Rick
You keep lumping " automatic " together with " unattended "
As you may know the ProrNet site says to NEVER leave
your station untended as well as the WL2K site.
Yeah I hear it also
Would not want to QRM them..
>Hello, John.
>
>Been listening around 0223Z - I just saw your message then - not
>hearing you. There is some voice activity quite nearby but no
>indication of your P1 signal.
>
>Not sure when you started but
I have been calling CQ on 7077.5 P1.
The biggest problem with Pactor-3 in the U.S. is that it periodicly fuels a
desire to elimnate all digital modes with a similar bandwidth as the FCC would
never ban a specific product.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: Demetre SV1UY
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
At 10:48 AM 1/4/2008, you wrote:
>Nice analogy, John.
Sorry Dave, I just call em as I see em
I'm just jumping on the NBEMS bandwagon and am wondering if there's a
dedicated place for asking about NBEMS technical issues other than this
list.
Thanks,
John W2KI
So, anyone up to try these out on 30 or 20M? presently on 30
17:30Z
John
VE5MU
Charles
please don't lump us good pactor operators in with
the PMBO operators. There is as much difference
as there is a house guest to a burglar.
At 08:44 AM 1/4/2008, you wrote:
>Don't hold your breath while you wait for an enthusiastic response from
>Packet operators, who are constantly QRM'ed
Testing NBEMS 30M 10140 PSK31 flarq beacon as of 1400Z
John
VE5MU
?)on in the AM . Will be listening
on 10137.0 1000hz
Man , with Sylpheed, Flarq, and vbdigi, I feel like I have fallen into a
linux rabbit-hole hi hi
John
VE5MU
At 08:34 PM 1/1/2008, you wrote:
>John, you might ask yourself if your above comment is worthy of your
>personal level of maturity.
Roger please, I'm not the one that can't fine a pactor QSO.
Sorry I didn't send in a log, I only made the one contact, with ZL1CV.
I killed my BBS computer earlier in the morning so spent the next 16 hours
trying to fix the beast.
73, John de VK2XGJ
One of the reasons politicians try so hard to get themselv
The flaw is that some seem to forget that under FCC rules
you can't have a station unattended...
At 02:39 AM 1/1/2008, you wrote:
>The flaw in your rhetoric, Jaak, is that Winlink PMBOs are QRMing existing
>QSOs whether or not an emergency is in progress. No one has a problem with
>this during
At 01:20 PM 12/31/2007, you wrote:
>I might be wrong but I think that MixW can parse Pactor1 FEC.
>
>de Roger W6VZV
Why even try?
You have stated a number of times "pactor is dead" !
Ham radio is supposed to do both. One of my ham neighbors in LA checked into an
80 meter AM net almost every night with the same model rig that he used in the
1950's.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: W2XJ
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, Dec
23 dB suppression 4 kHz from
the carrier under any circumstances. There could be an exception for older AM
transmitters or transmitters under 10W PEP. What is really needed is a rule
that says 3rd order IMD must be at least 30 dB down.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: W2XJ
ipment can continue to be used but hams with more modern equipment
can be more efficient and use a larger percentage of the channel. The ARRL
proposal of 9 kHz at -23 dB might be the best than AM'ers can acheive now.
73,
John
KD6OZH
g for more digital capabilities as they use PCs just as much
as any commercial business. They'll use whatever frequencies hams provide
equipment for.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: bruce mallon
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, December 30,
opened up around 2200Z on the 29th, copying RTTY stations
form JA, South America, Europe, etc. I am becoming a believer in this band
hi hi
Happy New Year to all from the great white north
John
VE5MU
d isn't available to hams for QSOs.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: bruce mallon
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com ; R.obert Mount
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 03:16 UTC
Subject: [digitalradio] 220 sits empty
The spectrum between 50 and 450 MHz is use
501 - 600 of 1844 matches
Mail list logo
