I have read with interest some of the responses on this thread and they
are very varied indeed. Personally, I like to keep an open mind however
I do think that Logitech have a steep climb if they want to establish
themselves in the high-end audio market.
I must say that I have always been very ha
i think the lcd should be color on the remote, but i see no harm in
having a secondary video output to a tv or whatever, superimposing
info.
--
MrSinatra
www.LION-Radio.org
Using:
Squeezebox2 w/SS 6.5.1 (beta!?) - Win XP Pro SP2 - 3.2ghz / 2gig ram
-
earthbased;150284 Wrote:
> I think a cool idea would be for the SB to have a video output so lyrics
> and album info/art could be shown on the TV.
Not crazy about the idea unless it doesn't take away from the focus on
the LCD. I bought a squeezebox cuz I didn't want to have to use a TV to
listen
I was shocked when I read the announcement. However following the thread
gives some hope.
I hope that a product in the "upper consumer range" like the squeezebox
will still be marketed under the slimdevices brand name. I really
wouldn't like to have a Logitech product on my stereo.
And I really
i've been watching and following slim since the first days. i currently
have 4 squeezebox3 units and have resold my older units to friends and
family. i have too say that this announcement brings a bit of sadness
to my life. although i know there are examples of
megacorp-buys-little-guy-hero-and-l
I hope this means parallel streams of new product development. I for one
fancy a WiFi connected portable Slimserver compatible player. Just up
Logitechs' street.
--
Koenraadr
Koenraadr's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.
Trackballs RULE!
--
gdg
gdg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1122
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28821
__
John Gorst;147457 Wrote:
> >
>
> Video squeezebox??
> (not actually interested in one myself)
>
I think a cool idea would be for the SB to have a video output so
lyrics and album info/art could be shown on the TV.
--
earthbased
---
Now when you mention it.
I had one of those black spherical ones that looked quite funky when
they came out. It was USB (so was advanced for its time). Support for
it was just dropped for no apparent reason not long after I got it.
Made me mad as hell as those things weren't cheap in those days. I
dwc;150096 Wrote:
> I on the other hand have been part of a small company that was *not
> *acquired by a larger one.
>
> It went out of business as players with much bigger budgets stomped the
> market.
>
> Sean did the right thing for Slim Devices.
Actually, in our case we might as well have
Mitch Harding;150093 Wrote:
> I, on the other hand, would purchase Microsoft hifi if it sounded good.
> The
> label doesn't affect the sound.
>
> On 10/26/06, P Floding <
> P.Floding.2gb86n1161907801 (AT) no-mx (DOT) forums.slimdevices.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > That is the way it works in the conno
P Floding;150078 Wrote:
> I've been part of a small company that was acquired by a larger one, and
> I can see all sorts of problems on the horizon.
I on the other hand have been part of a small company that was *not
*acquired by a larger one.
It went out of business as players with much bigger
I, on the other hand, would purchase Microsoft hifi if it sounded good. The label doesn't affect the sound.On 10/26/06, P Floding <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:That is the way it works in the connoisseur arena. And there is nothing
level-headed people can do about it, no matter how logical theirargum
P Floding;150082 Wrote:
> That is the way it works in the connoisseur arena. And there is nothing
> level-headed people can do about it, no matter how logical their
> arguments are. I would NOT want a Microsoft hifi. Period!
Well, for the "connoisseurs" there's always sonos, olive, or sooloos
:)
JackOfAll;148617 Wrote:
> Well, I'm certainly not narrow minded; I listen. As I hinted in a
> previous post, I socialise with audiophiles. As a direct result of
> hearing a Squeezebox in my system, at least 5 people have bought one.
> Let me tell you, it was hard enough to get those people to lea
junien;147410 Wrote:
> Let me introduce myself. My name is Junien Labrousse, Logitech SVP of
> the Entertainment and Communication Business Unit.
> The first thing I'll say is that we are very excited about the
> opportunity that Slim Devices will bring to Logitech. This is
> a great extension
> For the general computer consumer I think it is very complicated.
>
Yes, its probably not user-friendly enough for most people. I was
talking to my brother (who doesn't know beans about computers) and
raved about my Squeezebox. He said: "very cool, where can I get one?"
And I answered: " I war
That is too bad. Did you try to get help from these mailing lists? There are many helpful users here...On 10/26/06, GregP <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Wow, Good luck... I'm in the process of sending my squeezbox back
becauase I was unable to get Slimserver to work even with some customersupport..
Wow, Good luck... I'm in the process of sending my squeezbox back
becauase I was unable to get Slimserver to work even with some customer
support... I don't think slimdevices is ready for the general consumer
market. For the general computer consumer I think it is very
complicated.
GP
seanad
I live in the Uk and my experience of logitech has been nothing but
excellent. I had a conflict between a logitech device and a PCi card on
my computer. I ended up on first name terms with a support guy in europe
and he battled away with the problem until everything was sorted. Very
friendly, so i
Wow, i just bought a Logitech Harmony 525 remote. If any of the Harmony
software devs come a knocking on Slim's door to offer help with
slimserver, LOCK IT!
This has to be the worst software i have used in a long time, makes in
Sonic Stage look good. Oh dear, i worry even more now.
--
autopilo
Grats to Sean and the Slim crew!
(When is the party?)
-Dan
--
dwc
dwc's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1892
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28821
__
> [[Microsoft logoed SB3]]
>
> Ouch! That would indeed be much, much worse in my opinion. Then I
> WOULDN'T have bought one, for sure.
*sigh*
Generalizations hurt everybody. I recently bought a Microsoft Natural
Elite Pro Ergonomic Keyboard 4000 (there's probably some other words in
the title,
junien;147518 Wrote:
> Well... we are just starting the integration. Our main focus will be on
> jumpstarting sales at retail.
This statement makes a huge amount of sense to me. Logitech has huge
distribution and marketing channels, and as far as I know, the
SqueezeBox is still distributed prim
radish;147454 Wrote:
> (my Harmony 880 STILL won't charge properly because of a faulty cradle,
> and support are pretty horrible to deal with) but we'll see.
>
Wow. I had that same problem. That was the first of two times I've had
to return my Harmony 880. While the remote is great for contr
junien;147410 Wrote:
> Let me introduce myself. My name is Junien Labrousse, Logitech SVP of
> the Entertainment and Communication Business Unit.
Greetings! Let me introduce myself: I've been a user of the SlimServer
software for several years, loving it so much that I built a computer
just to
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 05:31:11AM -0700, rhymesgalore wrote:
> Harry G;148941 Wrote:
> > I know that Mercedes today is made by Chrysler, whose cars we also
> > wouldn't buy, yet, the association doesn't bother me. Maybe because
> > they're so different.
>
> Ouch, that hurt my german "auto" pride
But for the audiophiles who talk of their audio systems like they talk
of fine wines, mechanical watches or art, this doesn't really work.
Hello,
all along this thread i keep reading how "audiophiles" like a product
or don't by just looking at the brand name or the faceplate. Please
stop that no
I think I have come up with the worst case scenario.
+---+
|Filename: sb3front.jpg |
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=1877|
+---
rhymesgalore;149028 Wrote:
> Mercedes Cars are still made by Mercedes, here in god ol' germany.
...and Aston Martin are still made in the UK... can you imagine James
Bond driving a Ford DB9? Hmmm...
--
Khuli
http://www.last.fm/user/khuli
---
Harry G;148941 Wrote:
>
> I know that Mercedes today is made by Chrysler, whose cars we also
> wouldn't buy, yet, the association doesn't bother me. Maybe because
> they're so different.
Ouch, that hurt my german "auto" pride^^..
Mercedes Cars are still made by Mercedes, here in god ol' ge
ezkcdude;148950 Wrote:
> Much, much, much worse...
[[Microsoft logoed SB3]]
Ouch! That would indeed be much, much worse in my opinion. Then I
WOULDN'T have bought one, for sure.
I'm actually surprised that noone has made a Logitech logoed SB image
yet. I guess it was just too obvious.
PREDIC
Tom;148975 Wrote:
> > isn't Porsche just a Volkswagen (or therefore: Skoda!) with spoilers?
>
> > It's the same company, isn't it?
>
> No, two completely separate companies, who have colaborated on
> occaision.
>
> Skoda is owned by VW, as is Audi.
>
> Tom
Porsche owns 25% of Volkswagen and
This is a bit off topic first.
Not completely separate - Porsche own 25% of VW (i.e. blocking rights)
and F. Piech chairman of VW supervisory board owns about 12% of Porche
and was CEO of VW up to 2002.
Following the analogy in relation to SD. The VW Phaeton was a
commercial failure - people did
VW/Audi own Bugatti and Lamborghini though
--
audiofi
http://www.audiofi.co.uk/reviews/
audiofi's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=726
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php
isn't Porsche just a Volkswagen (or therefore: Skoda!) with spoilers?
It's the same company, isn't it?
No, two completely separate companies, who have colaborated on occaision.
Skoda is owned by VW, as is Audi.
Tom
___
discuss mailing list
discuss
Human nature is a strange thing.
You hit the nail on the head.
For me, I'm already in the club. Unless Audio Research, Classe or Theta
builds something similar, I'll probably buy a Transporter. Just please
don't name it LogSqueeze.
I liked your posting: while the message is the same as said
blackbear;148919 Wrote:
> Stop whining, people! ;-)
> I could have been much, much worse:
> (And I still would have bought one!)
Much, much, much worse...
+---+
|Filename: sbms.jpg
Human nature is a strange thing.
Before I bought my wife her last Mercedes, a car buff friend insisted
we drive a Honda before making up our minds. He felt the Accord coupe
was a more modern, somewhat better car than the Mercedes coupe and
would save us about $8000.
>From the test drive, I'll
Stop whining, people! ;-)
I could have been much, much worse:
(And I still would have bought one!)
+---+
|Filename: fp_sb3.gif |
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attach
Here here.
It's "HEAR HEAR", as in "Oh my fellows, won't you unplug your ears and
hark unto the clear wisdom emanating from this person who is
speaking?"
--
"I spent all me tin with the ladies drinking gin,
So across the Western ocean I must wander" -- traditional
_
LHawes;148024 Wrote:
> Just heard the news so am of course quite late to the discussion. Read
> most of the posts and can see many different futures ahead for SD and
> Logitech but to my mind the most likely is that Logitech will create a
> good or perhaps very good music device - with a much lar
DrNic;147980 Wrote:
> Well, I don't whether to be happy or sad Come to think of it I feel
> it's more disappointment.
> I too hope that the big company ethos doesn't bleed over into Slim
> Devices, but somehow really have to try to convince myself of this.
> All I ask (like most on here) is t
There seems to be quite a lot of negativity floating around here towards
logitech. My take? It's only been a few days - give it a chance!
FWIW I don't think Logitech will be bad for slim. As others have
pointed out, they acquired harmony a while ago and those products just
keep getting stronger
gorman;148822 Wrote:
> is somebody saying that a Logitech branded Transporter would have
> received worse reviews than a Slimdevices branded one?
Nope, but with a Logitech brand name, it might never have been reviewed
at all by the audio publications. And I have no doubt used units will
have lowe
mauidj;148578 Wrote:
> gorman, I'm sorry but I don't think it is fair of you to label people
> "narrow minded" because they have an opinion.Sorry, I totally want to clarify
> the difference between stating that
something is "narrow minded thinking" and stating "you people are
narrow minded". I d
Wow - that made my day. Welcome Logitech. I think that is great news. It
will not harm to add a bit more consumer orientied point of views to the
Slim Devices Audiophile centric world. Make cash on the consumer side to
support the top notch development for a little market segement. I am
excited..
stevieweevie;148695 Wrote:
>
> (*how about a portable and child friendly and child-proof squeezebox
> please!)
No thank you!
--
autopilot
*SlimServer Version:* 6.5 - Windows XP.
*Amp:* Cambridge Audio 640a (living room) / Denon MD30 (bedroom).
*Speakers:* Mission 701's (living room) / Kef C
djfake;148744 Wrote:
> Before the acquisition I could send email to supportATslimdevices.com
> and was guarranteed to receive a personal reply the very next business
> day.
>
> Now I've sent the same message three (3) times and have NOT received
> any reply...
>
> US$20M isn't a whole lot of m
Before the acquisition I could send email to supportATslimdevices.com
and was guarranteed to receive a personal reply the very next business
day.
Now I've sent the same message three (3) times and have NOT received
any reply...
US$20M isn't a whole lot of money for LOGI (with a market cap of
US
stevieweevie;148695 Wrote:
> I was expecting something like this for the past few months as there is
> no way that SD have financial clout to market their products long-term
> on a worldwide basis.
>
> After the loss of http://www.meedio.com I was very concerned to see
> this thread in the Gener
I was expecting something like this for the past few months as there is
no way that SD have financial clout to market their products long-term
on a worldwide basis.
After the loss of http://www.meedio.com I was very concerned to see
this thread in the General Discussion Forum. It seems my initia
What ends? The unfounded doomsaying? I sure hope so!On 10/22/06, RadioClash <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:And so it ends.
--RadioClashRadioClash's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2839
View this threa
And so it ends.
--
RadioClash
RadioClash's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2839
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28821
_
gorman;148544 Wrote:
>
> JackOfAll, this is not targeted specifically at you, yours is only the
> last post of this kind that I can read without replying. Peace. :)
Well, I'm certainly not narrow minded; I listen. As I hinted in a
previous post, I socialise with audiophiles. As a direct result
gorman;148544 Wrote:
> At the tenth remark along this line I got fed up. What sort of narrow
> minded thinking is spreading among the community?
>
> JackOfAll, this is not targeted specifically at you, yours is only the
> last post of this kind that I can read without replying. Peace. :)
gorman
JackOfAll;148535 Wrote:
> And I agree with some of the other posters regarding the Transporter;
> putting a Logitech badge on it is a very bad idea!At the tenth remark along
> this line I got fed up. What sort of narrow
minded thinking is spreading among the community?
5 Years ago who the heck w
I'm surprised! Good luck to Sean and SD. I really hope that the
acquisition by Logitech doesn't destroy the ethos and personality that
SD had. Whilst I feel confident that Logitech can increase the sales of
low-end product, I wonder how long it will be until meeting a product
price point will resu
Congratulations! Never thought that a mainstream company like Logitech
would pay $20 million bucks for a niche producer. How much is that per
unit sold?
I'm pretty sure that Logitech did not aquire you to buy market power or
just the technical design of your products. They could have done that
th
Even if they never release another version of Slimserver, your Transporter will continue to work. If there are any show stopping bugs and if, for some reason, SD decides not to fix them, you can bet that the community will try to do so.
I dunno -- that reasoning just doesn't make sense to me. If
Phew...finally reached the end..30 pages and counting...could be the
mother of all threads!
As I sat here, listening to my 8-month old SD SB3, scrolling through 30
pages of comments on my Logitech MX laser mouse, and now typing on my
Logitech MX Keyboard (both of which I actually RECEIVED a rebat
No huge innovations, but plenty of very useful refinements.
Why would you need a new Lexus when the old Tin Lizzie is essentially
the same thing? They both have 4 wheels and can propel you to the
store.
--
Pale Blue Ego
docbee;148415 Wrote:
>
> What backs my claim (at least for me) is that I am still using a slimp3
> and I often thought of replacing it by one of the better looking, new
> models (I have a sb3 in another room). Each time I think of really
> replacing the slimp3 I come to the conclusion, that the
docbee;148415 Wrote:
> Hi,
> Each time I think of really replacing the slimp3 I come to the
> conclusion, that the slimp3 does the same as a new sb3 for me. So all
> the "new" prodúcts in this line are just minor improved, but none of
> them really opens a door to something basicaly new. If you t
Mitch Harding;148414 Wrote:
> Why would you hesitate to buy a Transporter due to the Logitech deal?
> The
> one you get will doubtless still say SD on it...
> [/color]
Yes I know that.
SD on the front or not...no worries.
...but what will be behind it? (support, upgrades etc)
That's what concer
CardinalFang;148311 Wrote:
> Most ordinary consumers take the Volkswagen, the same way that they'll
> taken an iPod and not an equally good alternative. Results actually
> don't matter that much to most people and they won't do the comparison,
> they'll take the brand they won't be embarassed abo
Hi,
sorry, i still dont see that there has been any major product
innovation since the slimp3. You are right, they did engeneering work
on the initial product, but from my perspective just a lot of minor
improvements (which were all wellcome, no doubt on this).
What backs my claim (at least for
Why would you hesitate to buy a Transporter due to the Logitech deal? The one you get will doubtless still say SD on it...On 10/20/06, mauidj <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Personally I do fear for the core values of SD and I am currently
holding my finger over the buy now button for a new Transporter
nicketynick;148373 Wrote:
>
> Anyway, the corporate beast simply will not have the flexibility or the
> focus (serving the masses takes a lot of resources) to remain on the
> cutting edge of product development. It's a pretty reliable cycle -
> small companies do cutting edge, get bought out whe
docbee;148401 Wrote:
> since the really great idea of a slimp3 years ago the innovation has not
> been at a noticeable high level
On the contrary, between the SB1 and the SB2 they completely redid
everything inside, going from an MP3 chip they bought off the shelf to
something they totally contr
On the contrary, I think Slim has an excellent record of innovation.
The hardware has evolved, in only a few years, from something that was
useful but clunky and inelegant, into a best-of-breed product which
looks great, sounds great, has vastly more functionality, and is the
same price as the pr
sorry guys,
except for sean and the inner circle that benefit from the $20m this is
extremly bad news.
I understand that the sd management prefered to take the money instead
of taking the risk of the next innovation step on their own bill. since
the really great idea of a slimp3 years ago the i
CardinalFang;148379 Wrote:
> you're just being insulting.
No insult to you, Cardinal, intended. Sorry if it was taken that way.
However, there is an insult going on here.
The real insult that I see is the insult to the principals in the
merger.
Most in this thread have assumed that they, who
CardinalFang;148379 Wrote:
> I *do* expect Sean and team to leave and set up other companies at the
> end of their earn-out - that's fairly typical for these situations and
> is why there is an earn out. We got the products we paid for, the
> company grew up and got taken over, that's the way of
Michaelwagner;148338 Wrote:
> To claim that you know, as a certainty, that this is going to be a
> disaster, is whining.
No it's not whining and you're just being insulting. I have no problem
with whatever happens, I have my Squeezebox and I'm happy with it. I
have a point of view based on exper
First of all, congrats to the SD team! It is a challenge to find an
exit strategy that preserves the value of the Intellectual Property
that you have created.
In my limited experience in M&A, I have learned that there are dozens
of factors that determine the outcome of an acquisition. The two mo
konut;148335 Wrote:
>
> I look forward to the day, in 5 years, when I'll have a SB6 in my shirt
> pocket. A flash based 2 terabyte device that uses QUAC( quantum
> universal audio codec) files, controlled by a Harmony fob, in my pants
> pocket, and viewable on the Logitech MONacle( media optical
> put the same spec Philips TV next to the B&O one and people go
> for the badge.
You're probably right, to a certain extent anyway.
There are definitely some who don't care about the badge or cost,
only results. And if the results can be had for fewer dollars, so
much the better. A good
Quoting CardinalFang
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
.
You've just described the audiophile market :-)
Again, we're back to the Slim Devices name having value.
I agree that Slim Devices has earned some "street cred."
Now Logitech will have the gear to bring value to their name in new
markets as well
why are B&O and Bose so popular for example?
I believe it is due to successful marketing combined with adequate
performance. I'm not claiming either provide audiophile or even
best-for-cost performance, but both are well-marketed and perform
well enough that the majority of their customers l
Kevin O. Lepard;148294 Wrote:
If you're not buying it because it doesn't perform, that's one thing.
If you're not buying something that does perform, but because it says
"Logitech" on it instead of "AUDIOPHILE EXPENSIVE BRAND X" on it (or
for that matter SlimDevices), then I stand by my origi
konut;148335 Wrote:
> I've read the 27 pages(probably 28 by the time I post this)
Only 7 pages now.
Did someone move 20 pages somewhere else? Or is page size different for
different users?
--
Michaelwagner
Michaelwagner
CardinalFang;148316 Wrote:
> People like to talk about stuff. That doesn't make it pathetic
No, but the whining does.
Face it. We don't know what's going to happen. Logitech is a specific
company, at this specific point in time, with these specific leaders,
subject to these specific market tren
I've read the 27 pages(probably 28 by the time I post this) of the
hand-wringing, grousing, congrats, and various 'special interest'
concerns about the Logitech acquisition, and am, for the most part,
amused. I suppose that, because of my age, I see things a bit
differently and prefer to look at t
CardinalFang;148311 Wrote:
> Most ordinary consumers take the Volkswagen, the same way that they'll
> taken an iPod and not an equally good alternative. Results actually
> don't matter that much to most people and they won't do the comparison,
> they'll take the brand they won't be embarassed abo
Jack Coates;148260 Wrote:
> Actually, I sincerely hope that both of them have better things to do
> than to participate in this pathetic whine fest.
What are bulletin boards about except to discuss things? People like to
talk about stuff. That doesn't make it pathetic, it's just human nature.
Quoting CardinalFang
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
.
You've just described the audiophile market :-)
Doesn't really fit with me. Sure, it's the joke, but any company
making audiophile gear had to start somewhere. Any name is made or
broken on the quality of their gear. Calling yourself TacT mi
Kevin O. Lepard;148294 Wrote:
> > > >Talking about pride, even if the quality of the hardware and the
> >> >service stays the same, the Logitech logo will never be near my
> hi-fi
> >> >gear...
> >>
> >> That's just silly.
> >>
> >
> >A Skoda is a Volkswagon in all but badge. Which one would
Kevin O. Lepard;148294 Wrote:
> If you're not buying it because it doesn't perform, that's one thing.
> If you're not buying something that does perform, but because it says
> "Logitech" on it instead of "AUDIOPHILE EXPENSIVE BRAND X" on it (or
> for that matter SlimDevices), then I stand by my
funkstar;148296 Wrote:
> None of us know the details of the deal SlimDevices have done with
> Logitech, so we don't know how SD will operate in the future.
Right. And until we know that, if we ever know that, this is all just
uninformed electrons flapping in the breeze.
--
Michaelwagner
-
God this thread is hard to keep track of :)
None of us know the details of the deal SlimDevices have done with
Logitech, so we don't know how SD will operate in the future.
Will they be dictated to by Logitch board? or will the be a completely
seperate, but wholy owned subsidury?
Everyone writi
I agree completely.On 10/20/06, Kevin O. Lepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >Talking about pride, even if the quality of the hardware and the>> >service stays the same, the Logitech logo will never be near my hi-fi>> >gear... That's just silly.
A Skoda is a Volkswagon in all but badg
> >Talking about pride, even if the quality of the hardware and the
>service stays the same, the Logitech logo will never be near my hi-fi
>gear...
That's just silly.
A Skoda is a Volkswagon in all but badge. Which one would you prefer on
your drive?
Never owned either. But if the _onl
Shoot! I meant to post earlier, now I'm buried on page seven. Even I
only read till page 3.
Anyways, I wanted to add my $.02
Congrats to the SD-Team, I hope this aquisition comes as a reward for
your hard work and commmitment.
I'm a little worried...yada.. yada.. yada. But, I've been a big fan
According to the late breaking news crawler on the San Francisco
Chronicle web site, a large cruise missile with the *Logitech* logo was
just sighted in the air, headed south towards Mountain View.
Come on, you guys!
--
Michaelwagner
On 10/20/06, nicketynick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:Jetlag;148239 Wrote:>> Or has Logitech already placed limits on what they can address in their
> posts?Talk about throwing down the gauntlet! I wonder if anybody will takethe bait?Actually, I sincerely hope that both of them have better t
> Or has Logitech already placed limits on what they can address in their
> posts?
They've been chained to thier desks in a cube farm somewhere and are
not given internet access so that thier productivity isn't harmed by
browsing and forum-posting activities.
Logitech is protecting thier investm
Sean and Julien have both already commented and responded to several
comments here. But the flood of responses here probably make it
difficult to respond to them all at once.
It's not like they have no other business to take care of in this
acquisition. Like talking to their own staff, etc.
--
Quoting Jetlag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
It would really be great if Sean or Junien would comment on some of the
concerns that have been raised in this thread since the announcement.
Or has Logitech already placed limits on what they can address in their
posts?
oh good lord. that's just too funn
Jetlag;148239 Wrote:
>
> Or has Logitech already placed limits on what they can address in their
> posts?
Talk about throwing down the gauntlet! I wonder if anybody will take
the bait?
--
nicketynick
Wireless SB3, Denon DRA-F101, Mission M31 loudspeakers
WinXP SP2 Slimserver, SMC
1 - 100 of 354 matches
Mail list logo
