Ian Laurenson wrote:
Here is an alternative bit of code, with the original code left as
comments:
sub Monday
oCurController = ThisComponent.CurrentController
oActiveSheet = oCurController.ActiveSheet
' Range(A47:AL126).Select
Shoshannah Forbes wrote:
On 25/05/2005, at 20:17, Mathias Bauer wrote:
But what's so bad with having the stylist open?
I really like the stylist, and usually doc it to the window. However,
when working on a laptop with limited screen real estate, the stylist
can be problematic.
You
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Also is not the language syntaxis is more about the framework of UNO which add
some complexity. However another place to look is http://ext.openoffice.org.nz
which is a wiki to PUSH the development of macros and add-ons.
To avoid rumours ;-): it's not UNO that adds
That is why I recommended that OOo point to Mozilla for that
functionality. Mozilla's already rather mainstream, but having the
official documentation point to it wouldn't hurt. If some businesses have
subscribed to the monolith way of thinking, hten perhaps an arrangement
can be made to
Approved! Unbelievable!
http://www.builderau.com.au/program/work/0,39024650,39190121,00.htm
8-(
--
Graham Lauder
OpenOffice.org MarCon New Zealand
INGOTs Certification Assessor Trainer
www.theingots.org
-
To
Graham Lauder wrote:
Approved! Unbelievable!
http://www.builderau.com.au/program/work/0,39024650,39190121,00.htm
8-(
The original article in ZDNet
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/applications/0,39020384,39200380,00.htm
--
Graham Lauder
OpenOffice.org MarCon New Zealand
I agree with you, Daniel, about improvements, but, this patent is try
to stake a claim on something that we have all been doing ever since we
created two applications on two networked computers that communicated
via some protocol. Read claim 1 and think about how broad it is.
Alex Janssen
At 05/30/05 10:57, you wrote:
Eric Hines wrote:
Actually, the concept of patents and copyrights is a good one
I'd agree about copyrights, but not patents. I think that getting a
monopoly on an IDEA is ridiculous.
Patent monopoly rights are very similar to copyright monopoly rights--just
At 05/30/05 11:21, you wrote:
I read this patent and I think it covers every conceivable method of
communication between computers done by applications, connected by any
means. If this patent is enfoceable, Microsoft would own the methods of
communicating on any form of communication means
On Mon, May 30, 2005 11:57:50 AM -0400, Daniel Carrera
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Eric Hines wrote:
Actually, the concept of patents and copyrights is a good one
I'd agree about copyrights, but not patents. I think that getting a
monopoly on an IDEA is ridiculous.
Maybe you meant
Eric Hines wrote:
I'd agree about copyrights, but not patents. I think that getting a
monopoly on an IDEA is ridiculous.
Patent monopoly rights are very similar to copyright monopoly
rights
No, they are *very* different. Copyright covers works, patents cover
ideas. The things you listed
On Mon, May 30, 2005 13:43:46 PM -0400, Daniel Carrera
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
If you invent a new light bulb or an antigravity engine I should be able
to use the ideas behind them to make my own bulb and antigravity
engine.
Absolutely yes, that's why patents have limited duration.
On Mon, May 30, 2005 10:57:42 AM -0700, OldSarge
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[two screenfuls of text snipped]
To All: Does anybody know what the Linux industry's take on this
patent is? Are they going to challenge it?
To all: may we all avoid to retransmit every time a lot of text that
every
On Sat, 28 May 2005 09:44:53 +0900, Kazunari Hirano wrote:
Hi all,
Does anybody know where Instructions for *Uninstalling* OpenOffice.org
2.0 Beta for Linux is? :) Thanks,
khirano
This is all covered in the setup guide for 2.0. Please see
http://documentation.openoffice.org/
--
The most critical function of a patent or a copyright is that it allows the
owner (I'll call this person, for now) of the thing--the invention, the
implementation of an idea, etc--to assert ownership of that thing. With
that ownership comes the ability to mandate, for the duration of that
Hi as i have been starting to play around with the OOo source code I have seen
many interesting stuff i should write somewhere (wiki or blog) I have seen some
interesting opportunities to start coding and fixing some of the code that it
can be improved.
One of this ones is the implementation of
M. Fioretti wrote:
I can accept a copyright-style protection for your actual work.
Stallman teaches us that copyright and patents are deeply different
beasts, so we shouldn't mix them, but, in the interest of a
stimulating and friendly discussion, I'll byte.
Yes, indeed. I should have
Daniel,
All I was pointing out was that MS didn't even do what you suggested.
You said since all ideas are based on relatively small modifications of
old ones and that is true.
They did not invent anything, although there patent would lead you to
believe otherwise. *grin*
Cheers back at
On Sunday 29 May 2005 19:21, + Lars Stratmann wrote:
[ MODERATED ] ***
Halo,
I found a bug in OpenOffice calc:
I had fixed my table at line seven. When I disable the fix-funktion my
cursur was in the editing-modus in field B7. After disabling the
fix-function the text
In Response to: Ian Laurenson,
The code listed below didn't work when I tried it. The original XL file
has 2 sheets setup and this code prints out the whole of the second
sheet. I can see that the area on the first sheet gets highlighted ie.
selected, but it doesn't printout.
'
Dear Sir
I would like to use Openoffice in tamil. But I am unable to download it. Please
kindly let me know how can I download it
Regards
M Sundaralingam
If this bothers you then write your EU representative or that of the EU
country you have business or project partners in:
http://wwwdb.europarl.eu.int/ep6/owa/p_meps2.repartition?ilg=EN
Otherwise, the situations is likely to get worse. As monopoly rents go
away, look for more things
I am writing to suggest that the filename of the file being edited in
Writer should be in the header line (or somewhere in the frame).
I am writing documents which are going through a lot of edits between me
and a collaborator on the Web. To keep the versions straight, we are
including the
Hilfsprogramme
Legt fest, welcher Dienst von welchem Programm bereitgestellt werden
soll.
Zugriff auf diesen Befehl...
Men Extras - Optionen - OpenOffice.org -
Register Hilfsprogramme
Der Register fehlt in o.g. Beta-Version.
Vista Airtickets - Orosz Péter wrote:
Dear All
I'd like to make TEMPLATES, i.e. an archived e-mail with the Sender,
Recipient,Subject, Text body, etc., which can simply be opened now and
then and resent.
I set which boxes (Recipient,Subject, Text body, etc.) must be filled in
A Fuller wrote:
Open doesn't import or export properly if the file was originally created in
Word/Excel. Most data lost is when the file is saved. If you create the file in
Open and save it in Word/Excel format, no data is lost when moving file between
Open Word/Excel. It imports embedded
Wheat Wheaty wrote:
Simple, HTML + PHP editing program would be great to add to the great
5 suite of openoffice! Thank you.
While I don't believe they are open source, they are free. I use:
http://www.mpsoftware.dk/htmlgate.php -- for HTML
and
http://www.mpsoftware.dk/phpdesigner.php --
Bob Hunter wrote:
Hello,
you are doing great! Keep going. One thing I may
suggest is the following. Get inspired from the
mozilla project, and split the monster into individual
applications. It will be easier to make progress, port
to other platforms (e.g. OSX), and improve their
stability and
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Yes, look for shell replacements, in windows the shell is the desktop, the
default is explorer.exe google for this replacements there are many that
have
multiple 'terminals' I use Aston.
Quoting Peter Kupfer OOo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Does anyone know of a OSS program
Volk, Andrew M wrote:
I am writing to suggest that the filename of the file being edited in
Writer should be in the header line (or somewhere in the frame).
I am writing documents which are going through a lot of edits between me
and a collaborator on the Web. To keep the versions straight,
Eric Hines wrote:
Actually, the concept of patents and copyrights is a good one
I'd agree about copyrights, but not patents. I think that getting a
monopoly on an IDEA is ridiculous.
--it compensates the inventor(s) for their efforts, and so spurs
innovation
I've never seen any
On Mon, May 30, 2005 13:43:46 PM -0400, Daniel Carrera
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Absolutely yes. That's copyright realm. But inventions and patents are
different. If you come to my home, see my half dome photograph, and
inspired by that go to Yosemite to make much better ones, none of us
Robert, I sincerely hope you are not a troll. Although some of your
emotive terminology suggests that might be.
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 18:57 +0200, Robert Horvat wrote:
Hi!
I try to use OOo2.0beta but i have much problems with it:
What part of BETA do you not understand?
CALC
1. Cell
Hello,
Did you go to http://ta.openoffice.org/ ?
I'm afraid I can't be very helpful because I don't know Tamil. But this
page should have instructions. You could also ask this question at the
Tamil mailing list: discuss@ta.openoffice.org
They would be most able to help you.
Best wishes,
Chris BONDE wrote:
Both copyrights and patents are monopolies on ideas, just a different way of
expressing the idea.
In which way is a copyright a monopoly over an idea?
I believe that an expression of an idea and an idea are very
different. I accept that the former should be protected, but
Chris BONDE wrote:
I like the last sentence LOL, also the reference of 'That's FOTFL
FOTFL? I'm not familiar with that acronym.
Cheers,
Daniel.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 20:24 -0400, Daniel Carrera wrote:
Chris BONDE wrote:
I like the last sentence LOL, also the reference of 'That's FOTFL
FOTFL? I'm not familiar with that acronym.
Cheers,
Daniel.
Falling On The Floor Laughing.
Dave
Hello All!
Have either of you filed a feature request or bug report about this? I
would sure vote for the option as it is in v1.1.x.
SC
On 5/30/05, Peter Kupfer OOo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Volk, Andrew M wrote:
I am writing to suggest that the filename of the file being edited in
Sweet Coffee wrote:
Hello All!
Have either of you filed a feature request or bug report about this? I
would sure vote for the option as it is in v1.1.x.
SC
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17856
Be careful when entering this debate. There is a faction of OOodom that
thinks
On Mon, May 30, 2005 16:39:12 PM -0700, Chris BONDE ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2005 13:43:46 PM -0400, Daniel Carrera
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Absolutely yes. That's copyright realm. But inventions and patents are
different. If you come to my home, see my half
On Mon, May 30, 2005 16:30:36 PM -0400, Daniel Carrera
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
What? Is Daniel crazy? Did he just say not to reward hard work?
I'm not crazy yet :-) and I do see where you're comming from. But I
think I have an interesting, and outside-the-box thought here:
What you just
On Mon, May 30, 2005 20:23:13 PM -0400, Daniel Carrera
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Chris BONDE wrote:
Now the basic concept of rewarding a person for disclosing their
idea to the world instead of keeping it a secret is good (patent).
That is neither the intention, nor the effect of patents.
On Tue, May 31, 2005 05:27:04 AM +0200, io ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
I believe that this development model should be discouraged in
favour of the small step model. Similar to the FOSS mantra
release early, and release often.
Your thesis is interesting indeed and it would be a wonderful
M. Fioretti wrote:
You can do it with small material things which can be built with
*very* little space and money, or in environments where, again
unlike software, everybody plays by the same rules. But you can't
release early and often new fuels, cars, microprocessors, or the
extremely complex
M. Fioretti wrote:
Another example: google for synthetic diamonds which have a lot of
useful industrial applications,
Indeed, and this link suggests that the existence of patents did not
accelerate the creation of synthetic diamonds at any point, but at
several points did slow it down:
M. Fioretti wrote:
Now the basic concept of rewarding a person for disclosing their
idea to the world instead of keeping it a secret is good (patent).
That is neither the intention, nor the effect of patents.
As far as I know, it indeed *is*. I (government):
1) make sure that everybody can
46 matches
Mail list logo
