Hi Rigel,
I might have a wrong view here. But I feel that reserving idle
personal chatter should be kept to personal e-mails as much as heated
debate about individuals.
Does anyone else agree with this? Should we attemp to work this into
the platform of the list, to an extent? Just to clean it
I might have a wrong view here. But I feel that reserving idle
personal chatter should be kept to personal e-mails as much as heated
debate about individuals.
Does anyone else agree with this? Should we attemp to work this into
the platform of the list, to an extent? Just to clean it up a bit of
c
Hi Armin,
And it's nice to see you back :)
thanks - though I even have hardly time for lurking
Let me get this straight, you don't have time for lurking, what with
royally observing solar physics and such, and yet you choose to involve
yourself in such a constructive discussion about eas
Sophie Gautier wrote:
And it's nice to see you back :)
thanks - though I even have hardly time for lurking
--
--
Armin Theissen +32 (0)2 373.05.14
Royal Observatory of Belgium - Solar
Hi Armin,
Armin Theissen wrote:
Hi,
I used to work for OOo and Gnome at SUN until about 3 years ago, and one
of my
(many) jobs was to find and patch out easter eggs from the Gnome desktop.
And it's nice to see you back :)
Kind regards
Sophie
--
Ian Lynch wrote:
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 11:06 -0500, James Walker wrote:
With all the discussions on "code bloat" wouldn't all of these Easter
Eggs add to that problem.
How much code do these things add to the overall size of OOo and will
removing them help bring that down just a bit.
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 11:06 -0500, James Walker wrote:
>
> With all the discussions on "code bloat" wouldn't all of these Easter
> Eggs add to that problem.
>
> How much code do these things add to the overall size of OOo and will
> removing them help bring that down just a bit.
It will make
The issue in the bug tracker is found here:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61685
Previously, every time the issue have been brought up, it's been closed
within a very short time.
-Lars
Lars Nooden ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Software patents endanger the legal certain
G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 15:14 +, C Cichocki wrote:
Sigrid Kronenberger wrote:
That's quite easy:
Cor Nouws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
C Cichocki wrote:
How do you access this egg.. I fancy a game
Yes, pls!
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 15:14 +, C Cichocki wrote:
> Sigrid Kronenberger wrote:
> > That's quite easy:
> >
> >
> > Cor Nouws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> >
> >
> >> C Cichocki wrote:
> >>
> >>> How do you access this egg.. I fancy a game
> >>>
> >> Yes, pls!
> >>
> >
> >
>
Hi Henrik,
On 2/6/06, Henrik Sundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If You chose not to use OOo due to its Easter eggs, which word
> processor do You recommend then?
>
> Here's what I found at www.eggheaven2000.com:
> 55: Encarta 95 Encarta 95 Group Photo egg
> 56: Encarta World Atlas
On 2/6/06, Cor Nouws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, one short then:
> The isue is about OOo without Easter eggs is more trustworthy.
> So software without (known) Easter eggs is trustworthy?
>
I've never had a problem trusting software with easter eggs. I've never
known of any large piece of s
Chad Smith schreef:
On 2/6/06, Cor Nouws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, one short then:
The isue is about OOo without Easter eggs is more trustworthy.
So software without (known) Easter eggs is trustworthy?
I've never had a problem trusting software with easter eggs. I've never
kno
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 20:48 +1300, Michael Adams wrote:
>
> I've had a look at the easter eggs today and they are a lot naff. They
> wouldn't hold modern kids attention for long. You have to realise this
> is the PS2/XBox generation.
Precisely. No great marketing benefit to kids except that they
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 22:33:02 +
Ian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 19:48 +0100, Henrik Sundberg wrote:
> > > >> make it my mission to personally visit Mr. Gates to say that
> > > >excel> does not have all components a good spreadsheet should
> > > >have... it> lacks ar
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 19:48 +0100, Henrik Sundberg wrote:
> > >> make it my mission to personally visit Mr. Gates to say that excel
> > >> does not have all components a good spreadsheet should have... it
> > >> lacks arcade gaming... or did they take it to the X-box?
> > >
> > >
> > > No need, to
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 08:04 +1000, Tim Fairchild wrote:
> What a pointless thread. I never even know the easter eggs were there... And
> they don't seem to stop OOo doing what it does...
That's what I thought until I stopped and considered the market I work
in. There is definitely a possible nega
Cor Nouws schreef:
Steven Pauwels wrote:
Or join the discussion. helps more then just saying we need to
lighten up :)
OK, one short then:
The isue is about OOo without Easter eggs is more trustworthy.
So software without (known) Easter eggs is trustworthy?
My prospects áre more serious.
C
Steven Pauwels wrote:
Or join the discussion. helps more then just saying we need to lighten
up :)
OK, one short then:
The isue is about OOo without Easter eggs is more trustworthy.
So software without (known) Easter eggs is trustworthy?
My prospects áre more serious.
Cor
--
Cor Nouws
ww
> >> make it my mission to personally visit Mr. Gates to say that excel
> >> does not have all components a good spreadsheet should have... it
> >> lacks arcade gaming... or did they take it to the X-box?
> >
> >
> > No need, to visit Mr. Gates, his software is already full of easter-eggs.
>
> So t
Robert Derman schreef:
Steven Pauwels wrote:
C Cichocki schreef:
Steven Pauwels wrote:
C Cichocki schreef:
Hi Chris,
Think you kwow what I mean: try and keep a friendly tone to your
posts, even if you do not agree, even if you are giving criticism on
someone. Its more fun that wa
Steven Pauwels wrote:
C Cichocki schreef:
Steven Pauwels wrote:
C Cichocki schreef:
Hi Chris,
Think you kwow what I mean: try and keep a friendly tone to your
posts, even if you do not agree, even if you are giving criticism on
someone. Its more fun that way :-P btw, I am a huge spa
Steven Pauwels wrote:
C Cichocki schreef:
Steven Pauwels wrote:
C Cichocki schreef:
Steven Pauwels wrote:
Emmanuel Mortier schreef:
Dear Sir,
During our last meeting of the "Liege Linux Team" (LiLiT), a
member shows me the game "starwar" available on the openoffice calc.
It's a pity
C Cichocki schreef:
Steven Pauwels wrote:
C Cichocki schreef:
Steven Pauwels wrote:
Emmanuel Mortier schreef:
Dear Sir,
During our last meeting of the "Liege Linux Team" (LiLiT), a
member shows me the game "starwar" available on the openoffice calc.
It's a pity to fall down on the sa
Steven Pauwels wrote:
C Cichocki schreef:
Steven Pauwels wrote:
Emmanuel Mortier schreef:
Dear Sir,
During our last meeting of the "Liege Linux Team" (LiLiT), a member
shows me the game "starwar" available on the openoffice calc.
It's a pity to fall down on the same problem as commercia
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 10:29 -0500, Chad Smith wrote:
> I think we may have stumbled upon a way to make some money for OOo.
>
> The Easter Egg StarWars game is actually called "StarWars Galaxy" - sound
> familiar? This easter egg has been in there for over 5 years. We could sue
> LucasArts for st
C Cichocki schreef:
Steven Pauwels wrote:
Emmanuel Mortier schreef:
Dear Sir,
During our last meeting of the "Liege Linux Team" (LiLiT), a member
shows me the game "starwar" available on the openoffice calc.
It's a pity to fall down on the same problem as commercial
softwares. One of th
I think we may have stumbled upon a way to make some money for OOo.
The Easter Egg StarWars game is actually called "StarWars Galaxy" - sound
familiar? This easter egg has been in there for over 5 years. We could sue
LucasArts for stealing the name of our game!
BTW, it's a fun Space Invaders Cl
Steven Pauwels wrote:
Emmanuel Mortier schreef:
Dear Sir,
During our last meeting of the "Liege Linux Team" (LiLiT), a member
shows me the game "starwar" available on the openoffice calc.
It's a pity to fall down on the same problem as commercial softwares.
One of the argument for the open
Sigrid Kronenberger wrote:
That's quite easy:
Cor Nouws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
C Cichocki wrote:
How do you access this egg.. I fancy a game
Yes, pls!
Go to Calc and type:
=Game("StarWars")
or
=Game(A1:C3;"TicTacToe")
and have a lot of fun with these two
Sigrid Kronenberger wrote:
That's quite easy:
Cor Nouws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
C Cichocki wrote:
How do you access this egg.. I fancy a game
Yes, pls!
Go to Calc and type:
=Game("StarWars")
or
=Game(A1:C3;"TicTacToe")
and have a lot of fun with these two
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 09:53 -0500, Chad Smith wrote:
> Why does this matter? The very nature of an easter egg is that you have to
> hunt to find them.
It matters in the schools market because once found it goes round like
wildfire and if its easy to do it kids will do it. Some simply to annoy
the
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 14:13 +0100, Steven Pauwels wrote:
> Maybe I should use the egg to market OOo... 'hey boss, if I am tired of
> working, I can play starwars :):)'
Or kids in school? On the one hand it might be useful to have an Easter
Egg to catch attention but in schools this type of thing
Steven Pauwels wrote:
[snip]
Well, I hope I get trough to someone here... Will I have to continue
starting discussions on things that bug people or will someone finally
sit down and think about the furure of OOo?
Your choise.
And ours to spend time on it. Or not.
Greetings,
Cor
--
Cor Nou
Nicu Buculei schreef:
Steven Pauwels wrote:
IMHO, it will take a hard-headed, thick-skinned, persistent fool to
try and get the OOo community to wise up. Right now you people leave
a very closed and unfriendly impression on anyone trying to help :)
But hey, who am I to say so...
I saw
Why does this matter? The very nature of an easter egg is that you have to
hunt to find them. I've never seen a corporate exec demand the removal of
an office suite for the presence of an easter egg. This is pointless.
There are people who like them, and it's much more trouble than it's worth
to
That sounds like a good option.
I can't find a way to CC between the discuss list and the bug reporter.
The discussion needs to be parallel:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61683
or
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61685
-Lars
Lars Nooden ([EMAIL
It's open, at least for a few more minutes, but with a new number:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61683
However, we will have to circumvent the behavioral problems exhibited by
developer pjanik in order to at least discuss the bug.
54703 is a query about the nature of
I've included some of your comments in the bug report:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61667
You can vote for it here:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/showvotes.cgi?voteon=61667
-Lars
Lars Nooden ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Software patents endanger the legal ce
There are a lot of Easter eggs in MSO, but there's no reason OOo should
have them in the release version, so I've submitted a bug report.
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61667
Apologies if it is a duplicate report, but the search interface for the
bugs is, um, less tha
Lars D. Noodén wrote:
binary is not a reasonable nor realistic option. There needs to be a
way to disable them or else just drop them.
maybe drop them in the binary release, and enable switching them in when
building from source
(for those who insist...)
a.
-
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 15:16 +0100, Sigrid Kronenberger wrote:
> Hi Lars,
>
> Lars D. Noodén <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
> I expect, that you're not successful with your bugreport. :(
>
> > I've included some of your comments in the bug report:
> > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bu
Hi Lars,
Lars D. Noodén <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
I expect, that you're not successful with your bugreport. :(
> I've included some of your comments in the bug report:
> http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61667
>
> You can vote for it here:
> http://www.openoffice.
Steven Pauwels wrote:
IMHO, it will take a hard-headed, thick-skinned, persistent fool to try
and get the OOo community to wise up. Right now you people leave a very
closed and unfriendly impression on anyone trying to help :)
But hey, who am I to say so...
I saw your efforts on Art and Ma
Steven Pauwels wrote:
Very funny indeed... and I really hope there are no business-prospects
reading this list...
This is ecactly the thing that works against you! How about
confidence... Is it not hard enough to break trough the barrier set by
MS is it is?
Confidence should be one of our ke
Hi,
I used to work for OOo and Gnome at SUN until about 3 years ago, and one
of my
(many) jobs was to find and patch out easter eggs from the Gnome desktop.
The philosophy was that easter-eggs should never harm anything or anybody
(the computer its running on, or any person or organisation wh
Emmanuel Mortier schreef:
Dear Sir,
During our last meeting of the "Liege Linux Team" (LiLiT), a member
shows me the game "starwar" available on the openoffice calc.
It's a pity to fall down on the same problem as commercial softwares.
One of the argument for the open source software is, "t
That's quite easy:
Cor Nouws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> C Cichocki wrote:
> > How do you access this egg.. I fancy a game
> Yes, pls!
Go to Calc and type:
=Game("StarWars")
or
=Game(A1:C3;"TicTacToe")
and have a lot of fun with these two games :)
When you type =StarCalcTeam() you se
C Cichocki wrote:
How do you access this egg.. I fancy a game
Yes, pls!
Cor
--
Cor Nouws
www.nouenoff.nl - www.bsooo.nl - http://nl.openoffice.org
Open. For business.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additiona
Rigel wrote:
could be a troll chad. Easter egg or no easter egg their voice is just
as relevant as yours or anyone elses. Let the guy have a life.
Rigel
On 2/5/06, Chad Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is ridiculus. Who cares if there's an easter egg? It doesn't hurt
anything. Gesh.
Chad Smith schreef:
This is ridiculus. Who cares if there's an easter egg? It doesn't hurt
anything. Gesh. get a life, man. Dang.
On 2/5/06, Emmanuel Mortier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Sir,
During our last meeting of the "Liege Linux Team" (LiLiT), a member
shows me the game "sta
could be a troll chad. Easter egg or no easter egg their voice is just
as relevant as yours or anyone elses. Let the guy have a life.
Rigel
On 2/5/06, Chad Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is ridiculus. Who cares if there's an easter egg? It doesn't hurt
> anything. Gesh. get a life, m
This is ridiculus. Who cares if there's an easter egg? It doesn't hurt
anything. Gesh. get a life, man. Dang.
On 2/5/06, Emmanuel Mortier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear Sir,
>
> During our last meeting of the "Liege Linux Team" (LiLiT), a member
> shows me the game "starwar" available on
Dear Sir,
During our last meeting of the "Liege Linux Team" (LiLiT), a member
shows me the game "starwar" available on the openoffice calc.
It's a pity to fall down on the same problem as commercial softwares.
One of the argument for the open source software is, "this program do
what he says
54 matches
Mail list logo