On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 02:43 +0100, Sven Hartge wrote:
I wonder if there's a better name for this than last_extra..
quota_grace_extra
Sounds good
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 08:15 -0500, stalker wrote:
mail is written to /var/spool/mail/username
and not to /home/username/Maildir/
This has nothing to do with dovecot, its the MDA
How do I get sendmail or what ever MTA processes mail to write to
Maildir rather than /var/spool/sendmail?
On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 14:14 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Noel Butler skrev den 2013-01-06 05:56:
[snip]
Personally, I consider 2.1.x more of a risk then 1.2 so I'm
sticking
with 1.2.17 until there is an urgent and compelling reason to move to
2.1, that's much the same attitude
On Sat, 2013-01-05 at 17:01 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
1.2.x is really really old
It might be old (only deprecated 12 months ago though so not THAT old)
but it is very, very, stable (and widely used in large installations and
likely will be for some time to come)
That said, it is pointless
On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 04:54 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
1.2.x is really really old
It might be old (only deprecated 12 months ago though so not THAT old)
i do not know here you work
but where i work is a no longer maintained software a no-go
Most places prefer known stability over
Why are people shit scared of abandoning these antiquated distro
versions and using the source
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 08:37 +, Tim Smith wrote:
Thanks Ben,
I'm using an Ubuntu Server OS (10.04) and it seems that the latest
package they provide is 1.2.9.
Do you know if anyone has had
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 10:53 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Just to let you know: I'm planning on releasing v2.1.11 today/tomorrow. If
you wish to get something fixed for it, ask quickly. :)
hah, but u won t do it...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 19:49 -0700, The Doctor wrote:
Who is the best CA Certificate provider for Dovecot?
Anyone but verisign, dont get me started on them :)
Now that Thawte are no longer owned by those criminals, I highly
recommend them for certs for web sites.
But if its just for
That's so sad, Marks a nice guy, and too fricken young for this to
happen
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 02:55 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Barry Leiba barryle...@computer.org
Date: 20. marraskuuta 2012 2.44.51 UTC+2.00
To: im...@ietf.org, imap...@ietf.org,
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 22:39 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
So what do you think about v2.2 allowing delivery of one last mail even if it
brings the user over quota?
+1 only if configurable, and with an additional configurable quota
percentage value option for those that do enable the
setting in postfix main.cf is:
smtpd_reject_unlisted_sender = yes
which will reject invalid envelope senders in your domain. (Note
the difference between envelope sender and the From: header.)
-- Noel Jones
it.
-- Noel Jones
Spyros,
Sounds like you have bigger problems, as you appear to have no disaster
recovery processes, since your using a standalone server, as recommended
to you earlier by Robert, rsync is your friend, and not just now, but
daily :) setup a rolling 7 day rsync archive (sata disks are big, cheap
thats a rather intelligent response now, isnt it troll.
On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 13:21 +0200, Pascal Volk wrote:
On 09/16/2012 12:48 PM Carsten Laun-De Lellis wrote:
Hi all
I receive the following error in my mail.log.
Does anybody know how to configure dovecot to get rid of this ?
Hi,
On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 12:48 +0200, Carsten Laun-De Lellis wrote:
Hi all
I receive the following error in my mail.log.
Dont use ldap, but, you should supply the output of dovecot -n it
might help those familiar with ldap setups assist you
Does anybody know how to
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 19:53 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
It's in my TODO, but I don't know when I'll get around to implementing it. So
many things to do right now..
Thanks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
As per this discussion almost a year ago, was there any attempt to
introduce failover mode planned Timo?
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 13:26 -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:
Perhaps it could be an option, either load balancing between all
available servers, or only using later listed servers when the
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 11:12 +0200, Warren Baker wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Morten Stevens
mstev...@imt-systems.com wrote:
No, greylisting is really a bad solution. It is not RFC compliant and delays
the mail traffic.
Since when? RFC5321 was updated to handle delays and then
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 14:06 +0200, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
You must not accept mail you are unwilling or unable to deliver - ever!
That insisted behaviour was changed four years ago, read up on RFC 5321
IIRC
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 07:22 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 7/24/2012 7:13 AM, Morten Stevens wrote:
Jul 24 12:27:32 mx1 sendmail[31933]: q6OARUOM031928:
to=dovecot@dovecot.org, delay=00:00:02, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp,
pri=152317, relay=dovecot.org. [193.210.130.67], dsn=2.0.0,
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 15:31 +0200, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
24.07.2012 14:30, Noel Butler:
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 14:06 +0200, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
You must not accept mail you are unwilling or unable to deliver - ever!
That insisted behaviour was changed four years ago
and like all the other constant off-topic crud here, you are free to
filter it out if you don't wish to see it.
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 15:46 +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
People,
this is a mailing list dedicated to Dovecot and the protocols POP, IMAP and
MANAGESIEVE with the one or
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 10:16 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Try this:
http://www.junkemailfilter.com/spam/
It's also a good idea to place a disclaimer when advertising _your_
products and services on someone else's list
On 7/23/2012 8:58 PM, fy wrote:
what anti-spam for you used ?
On Sun, 2012-07-15 at 11:32 -0700, Robin wrote:
Indeed. What I have seen is a create deal of variation in the
configuration (/etc/login.defs or your distro's equivalent) in terms of
making use of such things.
I don't see any added value to bcrypt over iterated SHA-512, really, and
Seem some people have never heard of keep it simple, stupidor
less is more ... sounds like a few people here are falsely propping
up their worth to their employers, making unnecessary BS to justify
their own existence.
My experience of over 20 years of this industry easily shows that
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 12:10 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
what you do not understand is that a proper SAN is NOT
an complex setup, it is in many cases a simpler one
because you have TWO controllers, disks with DUAL channel
and a proper RAID level in ONE device
to built all this redundancy at
On Sat, 2012-07-07 at 11:23 +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Fine. i understand that. What i am suggesting is not making large LUNs.
you get the best performance with directly attaching disks to your machine.
That's simply not true. 99% of block latency is rotational. iSCSI
It's not about
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 08:25 -0400, Jerry wrote:
Hell I bitch about a lot of things; however, that does not change the
facts of the case. Only a subset of this list received the message in
question -
Likely to see how many people bitched before the rest
- and I was not one of them.
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 20:32 -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
Jeff Kletsky wrote:
Even with good intent the message in question is clearly in
violation of CAN-SPAM and Cal. Bus. Prof. Code Sec. 17529, of which
the sender was informed of when my server was accessed.
---
And you have proof
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 11:35 +0700, Tamsy wrote:
All that noise because of one mail offering some paid support is so
one mail multiplies by all the miscreants in the world adds up to a
bucket load of crap
unnecessary!
Actually, it has merits, because it is spam, had it gone to users@ or
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 06:48 -0400, Jerry wrote:
basically a non-event. It must have been a really slow news day.
non-event? You wouldnt be saying that if certain other operators with
their products did that. I've seen you bitch and whinge about far far
far less over the years Jerry.
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 09:43 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
Almost every commercial product I know off does send unsolicited email.
Indeed, its why DNSBL's were developed
There's a delete or report spam button/shortcut key for that. If it helps
some other users, and more importantly the dovecot
It wasn't sent to the list, it was direct, therefore it IS spam
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 16:24 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
well, but what is exactly your problem with people offering professional
support for dovecot which is ON-TOPIC if this are not 20 mails each day?
signature.asc
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 11:42 -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
On 17 May 2012, at 10:56, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-05-17 10:20 AM, dovecot-20120...@billmail.scconsult.com wrote:
On 17 May 2012, at 9:46, Charles Marcus wrote:
Tim is working closely with Timo, and I'm sure got Timo's permission
Older versions of dovecot (all of v1) can under some circumstances
screwup and leave hung login processes, this more often than not occurs
if you have network issues, requiring a restart of dovecot to clear
them. Timo has apparently, IIRC, worked around this for v2.x and it
should not happen.
On
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 03:50 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 24.3.2012, at 3.19, Noel Butler wrote:
Yes, I was also thinking about that, but it's about removing the dovecot/
suffix from other directories as well. That might be something worth doing
(--without-package-suffix or something
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 03:50 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 24.3.2012, at 3.19, Noel Butler wrote:
Yes, I was also thinking about that, but it's about removing the dovecot/
suffix from other directories as well. That might be something worth doing
(--without-package-suffix or something
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 12:53 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 23.3.2012, at 12.44, Heiko Schlichting wrote:
Timo wrote:
So the only way I can think of how to change this is to add another
option to optionally remove the dovecot/ suffix from the directory, but
is this really worth the
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 07:28 +0100, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
:2012-03-22T11:55:Noel Butler:
perhaps it should be renamed then, given it violates the known normal
for SYSCONF dir, you've just created another form of --datadir
Not really. The way I see it works as expected
The purpose of any build scripts --sysconfdir is to tell the
configuration to build in a path for its binaries configuration file(s).
Dovecot 2.1.3, seems to insist that that directory is now /etc/dovecot/
ignoring --sysconfdir=/etc as in 1.2.x and previous majors before that,
is this a bug? if
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 15:46 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 21.3.2012, at 15.26, Noel Butler wrote:
The purpose of any build scripts --sysconfdir is to tell the
configuration to build in a path for its binaries configuration file(s).
Dovecot 2.1.3, seems to insist that that directory
On 1/24/2012 5:23 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-01-23 11:14 AM, Noel noeld...@gmail.com wrote:
If your problem is that your Internet Service Provider is blocking
port 25, you can contact them. Some ISPs will unblock port 25 on
request, or might even have an online form you can fill out
and forwards
connections to some different port on your computer. I don't know
of any free services that do this; dyndns and others offer this for
a fee, sometimes combined with spam/virus filtering.
-- Noel Jones
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 02:13 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
There are several huge Dovecot+NFS setups. They use director. It works well
enough (and with the recent fixes, I'd hope perfectly).
Not to mention other huge NFS setups that don't use director, and also
have no problems.
On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 07:47 -0500, Harlan Stenn wrote:
then as late as possible in the startup sequence, run:
- ntp-wait -v -s 1 ; start dovecot and postfix (and database servers)
I'll +1 that advice, I introduced ntp-wait sometime ago when dovecot kept
bitching, not a single glitch
.
Does this just check for valid user existence, or can it also check
for over-quota (and respond 500 overquota I suppose)?
-- Noel Jones
On 1/9/2012 9:37 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 09.01.2012 16:32, schrieb Noel:
On 1/9/2012 8:43 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/f562bcaca215 implements
postmap type sockets, which follow Postfix's tcp_table(5)
protocol. So you can ask:
get user@domain
On 1/9/2012 12:09 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 9.1.2012, at 17.32, Noel wrote:
Cool.
Does this just check for valid user existence, or can it also check
for over-quota (and respond 500 overquota I suppose)?
Hmm. That looked potentially useful, but Postfix doesn't seem to support it
at least
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 20:58 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
To prevent rainbow table attacks, salt your passwords. You can make them
a little bit more difficult in plenty of ways, but salt is the /solution/.
Agreed...
We use Crypt::PasswdMD5 -
unix_md5_crypt() for all general password
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 21:06 -0500, Patrick Domack wrote:
Quoting Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net:
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 20:58 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
To prevent rainbow table attacks, salt your passwords. You can make them
a little bit more difficult in plenty of ways
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 03:26 +0100, Pascal Volk wrote:
On 01/05/2012 02:59 AM Noel Butler wrote:
We use Crypt::PasswdMD5 -
unix_md5_crypt() for all general password storage including mail/ftp
etc, except for web, where we need to use apache_md5_crypt().
Huh, why do you need to store
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 04:05 +0100, Pascal Volk wrote:
On 01/05/2012 03:36 AM Noel Butler wrote:
Because with multiple servers, we store them all in (replicated)
mysql :) (the same with postfix/dovecot).
and as I'm sure you are aware, Apache does not understand standard
crypted MD5
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 22:16 -0500, David Ford wrote:
with multiple servers, we use pam nss, with a replicated ldap backed.
public accessible mode :P oh dont start me on that, but luckily I'm
not subjected to its dangers...and telling Pascal bout Bourbon made me
realise its time to head
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 09:22 +0100, Cor Bosman wrote:
This also is not the kernel list, since updating to a kernel released in
the 21st century Cor's issue has gone away, so this thread is now rather
entirely pointless on the Dovecot list. So I'll my participation in
Actually, it hasn't.
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 06:31 -0500, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 06:13:36 -0500
Charles Marcus articulated:
On 2011-12-21 11:18 PM, Simon Brereton
simon.brere...@buongiorno.com wrote:
It would be interesting to chart the number of threads caused by
each distro. I don't know who
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 14:11 +, Alan Brown wrote:
DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS
another goose who think he's god...
if you dont like a thread, dont read it, especially since its been
marked as OT for past 10 or posts, ya moron.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 00:49 +0100, Christopher Stolzenberg wrote:
2011/12/22 Jim Knuth j...@jkart.de:
am 22.12.11 00:15 schrieb Christopher Stolzenberg
xchris...@googlemail.com:
Indeed; very many of us use Debian stable. Which kernel did you install
that is 2.0.16-friendly, and
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 23:18 -0500, Simon Brereton wrote:
I'm with Jim. Debian has served me well for years. This is just
distro-bias. Sure, you need modicum more sense and hands on experience,
distro holy ways will outlast the real world holy wars, we each have a
distro we all stand by,
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 08:08 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 22.12.2011 00:49, schrieb Christopher Stolzenberg:
2011/12/22 Jim Knuth j...@jkart.de:
am 22.12.11 00:15 schrieb Christopher Stolzenberg
xchris...@googlemail.com:
Indeed; very many of us use Debian stable. Which kernel
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 08:42 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 22.12.2011 08:27, schrieb Noel Butler:
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 08:08 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 22.12.2011 00:49, schrieb Christopher Stolzenberg:
2011/12/22 Jim Knuth j...@jkart.de:
am 22.12.11 00:15 schrieb
Have you tried using a modern kernel? that one is about 2 years old.
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 00:32 +0100, Cor Bosman wrote:
Hey all, I upgraded some servers today from Debian Lenny to Debian Squeeze,
and after the upgrade I started getting dovecot crashes. I was on 2.0.13 but
got these
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 02:32 +0100, Sven Hartge wrote:
Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 00:32 +0100, Cor Bosman wrote:
# 2.0.16: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.32.36-xsserver x86_64 Debian 6.0.3
Have you tried using a modern kernel
On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 13:49 +0100, Edgar Fuß wrote:
Then the 'S' flag is added to the current Maildir filename without
losing any other changes.
And this is supposed to work even over NFS? Great.
Absolutely, always has worked over NFS
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 21:35 +0100, Miguel Tormo wrote:
El Jueves, 24 de Noviembre de 2011 20:25:47 Timo Sirainen escribió:
I'm not sure if changing /etc/security/limits.conf helps. It's probably
only used by PAM when user logs in, so if Dovecot is started in system
bootup it's unlikely to
).
The OP is offering STARTTLS for both services, which is good.
--
Regards,
Tom
The confusion is caused by the way some client software
differentiate these services in their configuration, often referring
to wrappermode smtps/imaps as SSL, and STARTTLS as TLS.
-- Noel Jones
-BEGIN PGP
*sigh*
As usual Stanley, you do not contribute anything constructive, only
trollish jibberish
Charles' advice however would be my next step, but at this point I think
it's a bit drastic.
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 02:33 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 10/25/2011 2:34 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 11:33 -0700, Jack Fredrikson wrote:
mailbox_command = /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver -f $SENDER -a
$RECIPIENT
get rid of this ^ in postifx main.cf
dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
flags=DRhu user=dovecot
Hi,
I've been away for a while, and the previous threads I stopped reading
because it makes reading War and Peace look more enticing.
Have you run in debug mode?
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 11:33 -0700, Jack Fredrikson wrote:
Hi;
I continue to be plagued with this error:
Oct 25 10:49:18
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 20:16 -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 08:02:57PM -0700, Noel Butler wrote:
suggest, having just one master server, after all, dovecot and postfix
just need to read, not alter/update/insert etc.
True; but the pieces that are altering/updating
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 19:33 -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:
default_pass_scheme = PLAIN
Uhg i'll pretend I didnt see that :)
According to the sample SQL configuration file HA / round-robin
load-balancing is supported by giving multiple host settings, like:
host=sql1.host.org
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 09:10 +0300, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
On 08/06/2011 01:32 AM, Ian Evans wrote:
I run a Dovecot 1.2.16 pop3 server and have just started using the
Thunderbird 5 email client.
Thunderbird is set to leave the messages on the server unless they are
over 91 days old.
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 16:05 +0200, Laurent CARON wrote:
On 17/08/2011 16:00, Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
Is there any way to achieve this with dovecot? Does anybody have another
idea smoothly force used to switch to TLS?
Hi,
Maybe by sending them an email with a deadline for the end of
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 17:12 -0400, Postmaster wrote:
I'm not able to access the mailing list archives following the
instructions here...
http://www.dovecot.org/mailinglists.html
using either IMAP or by downloading the mbox file.
replace www.dovecot.org with dovecot.org
the mirror
On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 14:02 +0200, spamv...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi..
are there any proofen Methods to backup all mail ?
shutting down dovecot and tar the hole dir?
using rsnapshot?
any hints / thoughts
im running dovecot2 on freebsd
I assume it's only a single stand alone
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 16:55 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 7/28/2011 2:51 AM, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
Now the problem concerns outgoing messages. If I try to send e-mail
through out command mail (local user) or through out authentication
provided by a virtual user I get a bounce error
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 16:12 +0100, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
30 Degrees Centigrade whilst 22 outside? Where the heck are you
living ?
Indeed, at 22c I'm still wearing a jumper :) ... 30c is just right.
attachment: face-smile.png
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On Sat, 2011-07-16 at 00:40 +0200, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
On 11-07-11 5:03 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On Linux, load average strictly shows total system CPU usage in
intervals, nothing else.
That would be FreeBSD, AFAIK. On linux, I/O does add to the load
You're right Miquel,
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 18:40 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Since maildir is IOPS heavy and NFS/GFS/OCFS don't seem to like high
IOPS workloads that make heavy use of locking, mbox becomes very
attractive due to it's very low IOPS demands. If you can live with the
folder tree limitations of
I think we all know who the troll is here
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 07:14 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-06-27 9:06 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
On 2011-06-27 9:21 PM, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
I hope this is a lightly used server and does not do any real level
of mail traffic else you'll soon
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 11:40 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Maybe a little off-topic - but I hope not too much.
Looking for some insight on setting up Dovecot under a virtual server.
In particular, I use VirtualBox - and at the moment, Ubuntu Linux.
I hope this is a lightly used server
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 02:21 +0100, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
I hope this is a lightly used server and does not do any real level of
mail traffic else you'll soon regret running in any VM :)
Don't mean to start a flame war, but your statement above is just simply
inaccurate. The main
they setup the one I was telling you about, that guys off
with the flu, but I'll email him
IMO anyway..
Noel: I tried to reply to your email off list, but it bounced :(
Looks like milter caught you on generic DNS
Cheers
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
That clown is a tad over paranoid...
The only real issue with devices using ipv6 is that most people become
relaxed with security, preferring with ipv4 to do it all on the NAT box,
with ipv6 there is no NAT, so if you have 5 machines, you need to
configure full security on all.
If you're an
On 13.5.2011, at 2.39, Noel Butler wrote:
rsync not active? or now protected to mirrors?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
rsync not active? or now protected to mirrors?
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 18:52 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.13.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.13.tar.gz.sig
I've almost managed to read my email backlog, but there are still some
service.
-- Noel Jones
. Exceptions
are virtual machines, which have their own time tools, and
personal devices that sleep/resume frequently, AFAIK no
reliable solution for these.
-- Noel Jones
/backwards
warnings.
!
Seriously ?
Definitely you should run ntpd -- but you need to make sure
that it's configured correctly and working. Running ntpdate
will cause time to jump.
-- Noel Jones
features.
-- Noel Jones
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 20:33 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Cor Bosman put forth on 1/16/2011 5:34 PM:
Btw, our average mailsize last we checked was 30KB. Thats a pretty good
average as we're an ISP with a very wide user base. I think 4KB average is
not a normal mail load.
As another OP
LOL this is just s funny., watching the no no no im right you're
wrong, give up stanley, those on many lists are aware of your trolling,
nobody cares about your lil SOHO world, this list contains many
different sized orgs, and like someone else mentione,d the 4K email size
is SO 1994, but,
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 17:29 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
slow drives. The reason is that few if any organizations actually need 28TB
(14
2TB Cavier Green drives--popular with idiots today) of mail storage in a
single
mail store. That's 50 years worth of mail storage for a 50,000 employee
messages, I guess you also haven't heard about these things called
email attachments, please google it, we are not here to be your
educators, though christ knows someone needs to be.
PS your small message alone was 6K.
This is why people don't listen to Noel (I've had him kill filed for a
year
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 01:06 +0200, Karolis Žvaigždinas wrote:
We're using Dovecot v1.2.15 LDA/IMAP/POP3+MySQL with quota plugin,
quota_rule per-user size, quota_exceed_message and quota_warning on
storage=90%%.with script.
Everything is working as expected.
But I've been asked to
Replying to myself is bad I know but its holiday time :) at least for a
few more days...
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 09:32 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
That said, if you use dovecot 2.0.x's LDA, you *can* do this now, and
the wiki IIRC, does tell you how - we still use 1.2.x so I don't have
and use mysql - and be done with it, system users are
dangerous in this era anyway.
Happy New Year!
Noel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 02:39 -0200, Henrique Fernandes wrote:
It seens you are missing an / on auth path
or you did it intencionaly ?
first_valid_uid: 112
last_valid_uid: 112
first_valid_gid: 8
last_valid_gid: 8
plus, so which is it, 8 or 112?
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 11:03 +, Mark Alan wrote:
postmaster_address: m...@bronsteinlaw.com
mail_plugins: sieve
log_path: /var/log/dovecot/dovecot-local-deliver.log
log_path: /var/mail/dovecot-local-deliver.log
WTF, there is nothing wrong with his log file location
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 11:35 -0700, Willie Gillespie wrote:
Willie Gillespie wrote:
Does your configuration file have those characters in it? If so,
try getting rid of those.
It was pointed out to me that v2 does show characters in the docs,
which I guess is a change since v1.
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 23:37 +0100, Cor Bosman wrote:
We're running on bare metal, no VM involved.
Cor
Missed most of this list due to some noise levels and my lack of time to
sit through hundreds messages on every list I'm on, so apologies if this
was already suggested, due to errors in
201 - 300 of 487 matches
Mail list logo
