I would fit the data with various (r,p) arma models with the
the desired garch assumption on the evolution of the variance
and consider both the likelihood ratios and autocorrelation
of the standardized residuals to determine the best model
to fit the data. I have code for this if you want (althou
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linda) wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Hi!
>
> If I plot CDF of a sample data and this CDF looks like a straight line
> cross through 0. What does this implies?? Normally, CDF will not look
> like a straight line but sth like a "S2 shape, isn't??
>
> Linda
A s
Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linda) wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > Hi!
> >
> > If I plot CDF of a sample data and this CDF looks like a straight line
> > cross through 0. What does this implies?? Norma
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ian Buckner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The Box-Muller algorithm rejects roughly 22.5% of the
>generated points. I'm not aware of any bound on the number
>of consecutive rejections, other than a statistical one, hence
>my statement. I would welcome correction if thi
cheers
-Steve-
=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
Hi,
Thanks for your help! I went over these ideas and now understand my
problem better.
If I explain my simulation, it may help. Basically, I have a
simulation where various "agents" have to find a target. The
simulation is terminated once the target has been found. The current
measurement of pe
There is a test based on nonparametric density estimates. You can estimate
joint and marginal densities by nonparametric methods and then test if
f(x,y)=f(x)f(y). You can find some details and references in Pagan & Ullah
"Nonparametric Econometrics".
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Chia C Chong wrote:
>
>
> > Can anyone tell me how to produce a chart of the chi-square distribution in
> > Excel? (I know how to find chi-square values but not how to turn those into
> > a chart of the chi-square curve.)
I have an Excel workbook that does charts for chi-square (and normal, t,
and F). I'll send it yo
Thanks for the enlightenment, George.
I misinterpreted what was said in Numerical Recipes, where it starts
by
referring to the Box-Muller method, then gives your algorithm without
any
intermediate referral. Hence I had always thought of this method as
being B-M.
Hey, I learnt something new, can
The 'party line' is to take the first 30 or so points, calculate
limits, throw out any outside ones & add more at the end, until you
have 30 points, all of which are inside the control limits. For both
X-bar and R, if you are doing this sort of chart.
Based on (approximate) probabilities, there
Niko Tiliopoulos wrote:
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> Has anybody heard of the Bell-Doksum test?
IIRC it's like a Wilcoxon 2-sample test, except that the ranks are
transformed to normal scores. If that's the right test, it has ARE 1 vs
the t-test (it has good power for small deviations), but as you
Ronny Richardson wrote:
>
> Can anyone tell me how to produce a chart of the chi-square distribution in
> Excel? (I know how to find chi-square values but not how to turn those into
> a chart of the chi-square curve.)
>
> Ronny Richardson
>
>
If I read your problem correctly, an experiment is not really being
conducted. Rather, it is a static group comparison which is
essentially a pre-experimental design. The pollutants, fish, and
rivers are not "manipulated" by the researcher. The manipulation of
independent variables is the sine
Hi
On 20 Feb 2002, Voltolini wrote:
> I was reading a definition of "experiment" in science to be used in a
> lecture and the use of treatments and controls are an important feature of
> an experiment but my doubt is... is it possible to plan an experiment
> without a control and call this a
"Rich Ulrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:30:19 -, "Chia C Chong"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > "Vadim and Oxana Marmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]..
Linda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi!
>
> I have some experimental data collected and can be grouped into 2
> variables, X and Y. One is the dependent variable (Y) and the other is
> an independent variable (X). What test shall I made to che
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Truth) wrote:
> I suppose I should have been more clear with my question. What I
> essentially require is a textbook which presents algorithms like Monte
> Carlo, Principal Component Analysis, Clustering methods,
> MANOVA/MANACOVA methods etc. and provides source code (in C
Voltolini wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was reading a definition of "experiment" in science to be used in a
> lecture and the use of treatments and controls are an important feature of
> an experiment but my doubt is... is it possible to plan an experiment
> without a control and call this as an "
Voltolini wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was reading a definition of "experiment" in science to be used in a
> lecture and the use of treatments and controls are an important feature of
> an experiment but my doubt is... is it possible to plan an experiment
> without a control and call this as an "
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:30:19 -, "Chia C Chong"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Vadim and Oxana Marmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > You can start with checking if they are correlated. It's simpler to do. If
> > you find that they are
me points over and over. I will try to Consolidate
people into groups and then re-run the data. I'm not sure if this
will make a difference, but this is how i see it done in the
literature.
Statistics is interesting, it is hard to find information on the
problems you come across and they
"Vadim and Oxana Marmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> You can start with checking if they are correlated. It's simpler to do. If
> you find that they are correlated then you have the answer to your
> question.
> If you find that they are unco
On 20 Feb 2002 08:50:19 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MrTequila)
wrote:
> Hi all, hope this is the right place.
>
> i was just wondering what you should do when you establish some
> control limits but some of the data points you've just used are
> outside of the limits you just established?
>
> sh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Holger Boehm) wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Hi,
>
> I have calculated correlation coefficients between sets of parameters
> (A) and (B) and beween (A) and (C).
> Now I would like to determine the correlation between (A) and (B
> combined with C). How can I com
the real question is, 'how much accuracy (precision, variance) is
suitable?'
If you were to repeat the simulation run (i.e., a test) a total of n
times, then you could say that the true mean elapsed time was x-bar +/-
(certain amount), with say 95% confidence.
That is, if you were to then repeat
You can start with checking if they are correlated. It's simpler to do. If
you find that they are correlated then you have the answer to your
question.
If you find that they are uncorrelated and you have a reason to believe
that they may be not independent anyway then you can look for more
advance
At 03:59 PM 2/20/02 -0300, Voltolini wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I was reading a definition of "experiment" in science to be used in a
>lecture and the use of treatments and controls are an important feature of
>an experiment but my doubt is... is it possible to plan an experiment
>without a control and c
?? It is well known. Haven't you checked the
Combined Index to Statistics, or even looked in
The Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences?
Niko Tiliopoulos wrote:
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> Has anybody heard of the Bell-Doksum test? If so could you please give
> me a reference or a short descriptiio
Next question:
How much does Rasch analysis depend upon the evaluators being ignorant
that the method will be used?
In other words, can
(A) one Rasch-aware judge
(B) a minority of Rasch-aware judges
(C) a majority of Rasch-aware judges (but not the whole
well, one simple way would be to add B and C ... then correlate with A
if these are radically different scales, convert to z scores first
At 02:05 AM 2/20/02 -0800, Holger Boehm wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have calculated correlation coefficients between sets of parameters
>(A) and (B) and beween (A) and
Herman Rubin wrote:
>
> > ExpVar = -ln(UnifVar);
>
> It is not a good method in the tails, and is much too slow.
If I recall correctly, transcendental operations on a Pentium require
only a couple hundred clock cycles and can usually be optimized to take
place during other calc
Ian Buckner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The Box-Muller algorithm rejects roughly 22.5% of the
> generated points. I'm not aware of any bound on the number
> of consecutive rejections, other than a statistical one, hence
> my statement. I wou
Ian Buckner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The Box-Muller algorithm rejects roughly 22.5% of the
> generated points. I'm not aware of any bound on the number
> of consecutive rejections, other than a statistical one, hence
> my statement. I wou
I do not think this will satisfy on its own but it seems a good
starting point. SPSS has up on its web pages the statistical
algorithms for many of its procedures:
http://www.spss.com/tech/stat/algorithms.htm
As these are not the computer algorithmns (at least I hope not) I
think you will ne
The Box-Muller algorithm rejects roughly 22.5% of the
generated points. I'm not aware of any bound on the number
of consecutive rejections, other than a statistical one, hence
my statement. I would welcome correction if this is not the case.
Regards
Ian
"Radford Neal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
Daan Taks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a question about my residuals. When testing for autocorrelation
>I come to the conclusion that the models (garch, Egarch, GJR a.k.a.
>Tarch) remove the correlation from the squared standardized residuals
>but not from the standardized residuals.
Jus
Greetings !
Just reviewed your extensive experience with scientific publications and
would appreciate a response to my dilemma.
I'm not an academic and am attempting to [hopefully] efficiently cover
several surveys in math, physics, astronomy, etc. and need access to
online repositories of pu
That stock market returns follow a Martingale in general has been pretty
well disproved. See the survey literature in The Econometrics of Financial
Markets by Campbell, Lo and MacKinlay and A Non-Random Walk down wall street
by Andrew Lo. Index returns show quite significant lag correlations which
Herman Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
a4u99j$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:a4u99j$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Radford Neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Box-Muller does not work for real time requirements.
>
> >This isn't true, of course. A "real time" applica
The Truth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Glen Barnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > The Truth wrote:
> > >
> > > Are there any "Numerical Recipes" like textbook on statistics and
probability ?
> > > Just w
Charles Metz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The Truth wrote:
>
> > I suppose I should have been more clear with my question. What
> > I essentially require is a textbook which presents algorithms
> > like Monte Carlo, Principal Component Ana
Ian Buckner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> "Glen Barnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Ian Buckner wrote:
> > >
> > > We generate pairs of properly distributed Gaussian variables at
> >
The Truth wrote:
> I suppose I should have been more clear with my question. What
> I essentially require is a textbook which presents algorithms
> like Monte Carlo, Principal Component Analysis, Clustering
> methods, MANOVA/MANACOVA methods etc. and provides source code
> (in C , C++ or
On 19 Feb 2002 13:13:08 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Truth) wrote:
> Glen Barnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > The Truth wrote:
> > > Are there any "Numerical Recipes" like textbook on statistics and probability ?
> > > Just wondering..
> >
> > What do
Title: Re: Evaluation of skating
At 3:49 PM -0500 19/2/02, Dennis Roberts wrote:
One list I am on, we were having a
discussion about how it would be
possible to make changes to the methods used in the judging of
Olympic
Figure Skating, so as to make it less possible for collusion in the
judging
Stock market returns usually satisfy martingale property, and are
uncorrelated. I think you should check your calculations again for errors.
Are you sure that you are working with returns and not prices? I guess
that by "heavy correlation" you mean that estimated autoregressive
coefficient is clos
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Dennis Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At 07:34 AM 2/19/02 -0500, Herman Rubin wrote:
>>I do not see this. The binomial distribution is a natural
>>one; the normal distribution, while it has lots of mathematical
>>properties, is not.
>i don't know of any "dis
Glen Barnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> The Truth wrote:
> >
> > Are there any "Numerical Recipes" like textbook on statistics and probability ?
> > Just wondering..
>
> What do you mean, a book with algorithms for statistics and probability
> or a handbo
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Radford Neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Box-Muller does not work for real time requirements.
>This isn't true, of course. A "real time" application is one where
>one must guarantee that an operation takes no more than some specified
>maximum time. The Box-Mulle
On 18 Feb 2002 16:29:27 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wuzzy) wrote:
> > You should take note that R^2 is *not* a very good measure
> > of 'effect size.'
>
> Hi Rich, you asked to see my data,
- I don't remember doing that -
>i've posted the visu
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 20:57:36 +0100, "jan plessers"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I did a likert on 2 groups, a Mann-whitney showed that ther was a
> significant difference between the 2 groups.
If 'did a Likert' means what I expect, and
the scaling was decent enough to be worth com
>Box-Muller does not work for real time requirements.
This isn't true, of course. A "real time" application is one where
one must guarantee that an operation takes no more than some specified
maximum time. The Box-Muller method for generating normal random
variates does not involve any operatio
At 07:34 AM 2/19/02 -0500, Herman Rubin wrote:
>I do not see this. The binomial distribution is a natural
>one; the normal distribution, while it has lots of mathematical
>properties, is not.
i don't know of any "distribution" that is natural ... what does that mean?
inherent in the universe?
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Robert J. MacG. Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Linda wrote:
>> I want to generate a series of random variables, X with exponential
>> PDF with a given mean,MU value. However, I only want X to be in some
>> specified lower and upper limit?? Say between 0 -> 15
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Dennis Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>addendum
>if one manipulates n and p in a binomial and, gets to a point where a
>person would say (or we would say as the instructor) that what you see is
>very similar to ... and might even be approximated well by ... t
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Dennis Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>not to disagree with alan but, my goal was to parallel what glass and
>stanley did and that is all ...seems like there are all kinds of
>distributions one might discuss AND, there may be more than one order that
>is acce
Generated on custom silicon (surprise).
Box-Muller does not work for real time requirements.
Ian
"Glen Barnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Ian Buckner wrote:
> >
> > We generate pairs of properly distributed Gaussian variables at
> > down
Odd is defined to be
P(event)
---
1- P(event)
So if P(event) is 0.50, then the odd is 1 to 1. If P(event) is 0.75, then the
odd is 3 to 1 since 0.75 is three times as large as 1 - 0.75 = 0.25.
Given one of odds or probabilities, you can always derive the other.
Ken
Wuzzy wrote:
>
> http://www.accessv.com/~joemende/insulin2.gif
>
> Appologies, i also forgot to divide the KCAL in food by the 31 as this
> represents kcal. It seems to me logical to advise decreasing food
> intake and increasing physical activity to improve insulin
> sensitivity. I would prob
"The Truth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Are there any "Numerical Recipes" like textbook on statistics and
probability ?
> Just wondering..
>
> Thanks.
I think one of S-plus manuals, 'statistic with S-plus' comes close in
spirit, though with
Abramowitz, Milton and Stegun, Irene A. ,Eds., Handbook of
Mathematical Functions
with Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables, U. S. Gov't. Printing
Office, Wash.
DC Nat. Bureau of Standards., Applied Math Series 55 1964
ASQ has a couple "100 most valuable statistical equations" or some
such t
Ian Buckner wrote:
>
> We generate pairs of properly distributed Gaussian variables at
> down to 10nsec intervals, essential in the application. Speed can
> be an issue, particularly in real time situations.
Generated on what? (On a fast enough machine, even clunky old Box-Muller
can probably gi
The Truth wrote:
>
> Are there any "Numerical Recipes" like textbook on statistics and probability ?
> Just wondering..
What do you mean, a book with algorithms for statistics and probability
or a handbook/cookbook list of techniques with some basic explanation?
Glen
=
> You should take note that R^2 is *not* a very good measure
> of 'effect size.'
Hi Rich, you asked to see my data, i've posted the visual at the
following location http://www.accessv.com/~joemende/insulin2.gif note
that the r^2 is low despite the fact that it agrees with common sense:
Insuli
http://www.accessv.com/~joemende/insulin2.gif
Appologies, i also forgot to divide the KCAL in food by the 31 as this
represents kcal. It seems to me logical to advise decreasing food
intake and increasing physical activity to improve insulin
sensitivity. I would probably avoid reporting the R^2
The Truth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there any "Numerical Recipes" like textbook on statistics and probability ?
I am baffled. Numerical Recipes partly is a book on statistics and
probability. Incidentally:
303778 May 2 1991 ftp://garbo.uwasa.fi/pc/turbopas/nrpas13.zip
nrpas13.zip Numeri
Hi Dennis,
Dennis Roberts wrote:
>
> not to disagree with alan but, my goal was to parallel what glass and
> stanley did and that is all ...seems like there are all kinds of
> distributions one might discuss AND, there may be more than one order that
> is acceptable
Sure, I realised that your g
what is it you wanted to cook?
At 01:35 PM 2/18/02 -0800, The Truth wrote:
>Are there any "Numerical Recipes" like textbook on statistics and
>probability ?
>Just wondering..
>
>Thanks.
>
>
>=
>Instructions for joining and leaving t
At 09:50 AM 2/18/02 +, Ian Buckner wrote:
>We generate pairs of properly distributed Gaussian variables at
>down to 10nsec intervals, essential in the application. Speed can
>be an issue, particularly in real time situations.
>
>Ian
wow ... how our perspectives have changed! back in grad scho
Alan Miller wrote (six times):
>
> Linda wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >I want to generate a series of random variables, X with exponential
> >PDF with a given mean,MU value. However, I only want X to be in some
> >specified lower and upper limit?? Say between 0 -> 150 i.e. rejected
addendum
if one manipulates n and p in a binomial and, gets to a point where a
person would say (or we would say as the instructor) that what you see is
very similar to ... and might even be approximated well by ... the nd
... this MEANS that the nd came first in the sense that one would have
not to disagree with alan but, my goal was to parallel what glass and
stanley did and that is all ...seems like there are all kinds of
distributions one might discuss AND, there may be more than one order that
is acceptable
most books of recent vintage (and g and s was 1970) don't even discuss
Linda wrote:
>
> I want to generate a series of random variables, X with exponential
> PDF with a given mean,MU value. However, I only want X to be in some
> specified lower and upper limit?? Say between 0 -> 150 i.e. rejected
> anything outside this range Does anyone have any ideas how should
AP wrote:
>
> Hi all:
>
> I would appreciate your help in solving this question.
>
> calculate the standard deviation of a sample where the mean and
> standard deviation from the process are provided?
> E.g. Process mean = 150; standard deviation = 20. What is the SD for
> a sample of 25? Th
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Timothy W. Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I also think Alan's idea is sound. I start my students off with some
>binomial expansion theory.
Giving not the formulas for the standard distributions
but what types of problems result in these is good.
But I believe
We generate pairs of properly distributed Gaussian variables at
down to 10nsec intervals, essential in the application. Speed can
be an issue, particularly in real time situations.
Ian
"Glen Barnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
a4plof$p3s$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:a4plof$p3s$[EMAIL PROTEC
Art Kendall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I tend to be more concerned with the "apparent randomness" of the results
than with the speed of the algorithm.
This will be mainly a function of the randomness of the uniform generator. If
we assume
George Marsaglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
0l7b8.42092$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:0l7b8.42092$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> (3-year old) Timings, in nanoseconds, using Microsoft Visual C++
> and gcc under DOS on a 400MHz PC. Comparisons are with
> methods by Leva and by Ahrens-Dieter, both s
Bob Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Marsaglia's ziggurat and MCW1019 generators are
> available in the R package SuppDists. The gcc
> compiler was used.
Thanks Bob.
Glen
==
Alan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
OC2b8.28457$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:OC2b8.28457$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> First - the reference to George's paper on the ziggurat, and the code:
> The Journal of Statistical Software (2000) at:
> http://www.jstatsoft.org/v05/i08
That I already have,
I also think Alan's idea is sound. I start my students off with some
binomial expansion theory.
Alan McLean wrote:
>
> This is a good idea, Dennis. I would like to see the sequence start with
> the binomial - in a very real way, the normal occurs naturally as an
> 'approximation' to the binomial
On 15 Feb 2002 14:38:49 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (AP) wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I would appreciate your help in solving this question.
>
> calculate the standard deviation of a sample where the mean and
> standard deviation from the process are provided?
> E.g. Process mean = 150; standard deviatio
Boris,
there are lots of ways to use different statistically calculated
numbers. I am suspicious, nonetheless, that your concept of a plant wide
goal for Cpk, either as a point estimate or as a confidence interval,
will not let you reach the larger goal you seek.
One can manipulate the math to s
This is a good idea, Dennis. I would like to see the sequence start with
the binomial - in a very real way, the normal occurs naturally as an
'approximation' to the binomial.
Alan
Dennis Roberts wrote:
>
> Back in 1970, Glass and Stanley in their excellent Statistical Methods in
> Education an
Hi,
Well the survey is for a project looking into ways the Internet can
enhance learning.
The first part of the survey asks pertinent questions about their
current study/learning environment, such as "I have trouble finding
library books at the right time" and "I see lectures as a major source
o
Thanks everyone for helping me...
Regards,
Linda
Art Kendall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> try this SPSS syntax.
>
> new file.
> * this program generates 200 cases
> * trims those outside the desired range
> * and takes the first 100 of the remaining.
> *
for a small set of data like this using SPSS is pretty straight forward.
Use the data view (spread sheet) to put your data in. Use the variables
view spread sheet to define your variables. You can copy info from one
row to the other. It is worthwhile to take the time to put all the labels
in. be
Title: RE: Likert Scale Analysis - HELP!
It's difficult to answer a question that is asked so generally. You might try explaining to this group why you collected the data in the first place. For the most part, it is typically to:
1. characterize a specific group of interest,
2. compar
In article ,
Matthias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello,
>would be nice if someone can give me some advice with regard to the
>following problem:
>I would like to compare the means of two independent numerical sets of data
>whether they are significantly different f
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002 14:00:02 -0500, "R. C. Lehman"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Can someone tell me were to get Statistic's on second hand smoke.This
>is very important that I find the Statistic's on second hand smoke.
>
>R. C. Lehman
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>Thanx for any help you can give.
try this SPSS syntax.
new file.
* this program generates 200 cases
* trims those outside the desired range
* and takes the first 100 of the remaining.
* change lines flagged with < .
input program.
loop #i = 1 to 200. /* < .
compute mu= .005. /* < .
compute x = rv.exp(mu).
end case.
Linda wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I want to generate a series of random variables, X with exponential
>PDF with a given mean,MU value. However, I only want X to be in some
>specified lower and upper limit?? Say between 0 -> 150 i.e. rejected
>anything outside this range Does anyone ha
Linda wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I want to generate a series of random variables, X with exponential
>PDF with a given mean,MU value. However, I only want X to be in some
>specified lower and upper limit?? Say between 0 -> 150 i.e. rejected
>anything outside this range Does anyone ha
Linda wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I want to generate a series of random variables, X with exponential
>PDF with a given mean,MU value. However, I only want X to be in some
>specified lower and upper limit?? Say between 0 -> 150 i.e. rejected
>anything outside this range Does anyone ha
Linda wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I want to generate a series of random variables, X with exponential
>PDF with a given mean,MU value. However, I only want X to be in some
>specified lower and upper limit?? Say between 0 -> 150 i.e. rejected
>anything outside this range Does anyone ha
Linda wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I want to generate a series of random variables, X with exponential
>PDF with a given mean,MU value. However, I only want X to be in some
>specified lower and upper limit?? Say between 0 -> 150 i.e. rejected
>anything outside this range Does anyone ha
Linda wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I want to generate a series of random variables, X with exponential
>PDF with a given mean,MU value. However, I only want X to be in some
>specified lower and upper limit?? Say between 0 -> 150 i.e. rejected
>anything outside this range Does anyone ha
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Bill Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linda) wrote:
>>I want to generate a series of random variables, X with exponential
>>PDF with a given mean,MU value. However, I only want X to be in some
>>specified lower
Hi,
In ANOVA 1-way, when the factor level variances are unequal, you can use
1) F approximations (Welch or Brown & Forsyhte). Theses approximations are
something similar to the Satterwaihte's t-test approximation
2) a nonparametric test (Kruskal-Wallis)
Francis PEREE
"Thomas Souers" <[EMAIL PRO
Hi,
Define Y = X if X<=T
= 0 otherwise
For your problem, T=150 (threshold) and X is exponential random variable
with mean, MU.
So, first generate X and compare with T and assign a value to Y as
specified in the above rule.
Alternatively, find the CDF (distribution funct
101 - 200 of 5520 matches
Mail list logo