encoders
On Sat, 08 Aug 2015, Julian WIngert wrote:
Am 08.08.2015 um 04:00 schrieb EBo:
On Aug 7 2015 5:32 PM, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
On Fri, 7 Aug 2015, EBo wrote:
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 17:13:25 -0600
From: EBo e...@sandien.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers
I think the trick the Resolute encoder uses is this: the image is captured in
a perhaps sub microsecond flash of the LED, and then the image can be
shifted out of the sensor at a leisurely rate. The specifications sort of
suggests this (very fast capture (ns) time, but only multi KHz maximum
On Fri, 7 Aug 2015, EBo wrote:
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 17:13:25 -0600
From: EBo e...@sandien.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] research on optical encoders
On Aug 7 2015 4:16 PM, andy
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, Marius Liebenberg wrote:
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:08:38 +
From: Marius Liebenberg mar...@mastercut.co.za
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net,
emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Tormach PathPilot
On
On Mon, 1 Jun 2015, andy pugh wrote:
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 01:18:37 +0100
From: andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-developers] New TP or Old TP bug? (or neither)
On Thu, 14 May 2015, andy pugh wrote:
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 13:47:08 +0100
From: andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-developers] hm2_eth
Does hm2_eth support the
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, andy pugh wrote:
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 17:00:18 +0100
From: andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Recent patches to hm2
On 29
On Sun, 8 Mar 2015, Andrew wrote:
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2015 21:40:27 +0200
From: Andrew pkm...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-developers] New TP bugs?
Hello,
Today I ran into a
On Sat, 6 Dec 2014, David Armstrong wrote:
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2014 17:57:21 +
From: David Armstrong cncbas...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-developers] 7i77 and stepper output
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, John Prentice (FS) wrote:
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:21:06 -
From: John Prentice (FS) j...@castlewd.freeserve.co.uk
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-developers]
On Fri, 3 Oct 2014, Chris Morley wrote:
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 05:11:59 +
From: Chris Morley chrisinnana...@hotmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC DEV emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-developers] Pncconf in master
I have
On Sat, 4 Oct 2014, Chris Morley wrote:
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2014 18:23:41 +
From: Chris Morley chrisinnana...@hotmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC DEV emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Pncconf in master
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014, David Armstrong wrote:
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 15:09:53 +0100
From: David Armstrong cncbas...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-developers] analog spindle scaling
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 22:51:40 -0600
From: Sebastian Kuzminsky s...@highlab.com
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-us...@lists.sourceforge.net,
EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-developers] LinuxCNC
On Fri, 18 Jul 2014, Jeff Epler wrote:
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 14:54:33 -0500
From: Jeff Epler jep...@unpythonic.net
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] jepler/rtos-uspace: a new
On Sun, 6 Jul 2014, Gene Heskett wrote:
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 12:58:28 -0400
From: Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-developers] 5i25/7i78 question
Greetings;
I am
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Micha? Geszkiewicz wrote:
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:47:38 +0200
From: [UTF-8] Micha? Geszkiewicz mic...@wp.pl
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Ethernet /
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014, ELHIMA Moustapha wrote:
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 01:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: ELHIMA Moustapha melh...@yahoo.com
To: emc-us...@lists.sourceforge.net emc-us...@lists.sourceforge.net,
emc2 emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-users] Step motor in closed loop
On Fri, 30 May 2014, andy pugh wrote:
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 14:46:48 +0100
From: andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] RFC: Support for multiple tool
On Fri, 30 May 2014, bruno wrote:
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 17:29:28 +0200
From: bruno br...@tinkerbox.org
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-developers] bug with nurbs ?
Hello,
I wrote a quadrangle pocketing
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, dave wrote:
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 08:28:22 -0700
From: dave dengv...@charter.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Another query on numerical formats
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 12:02 +0100, andy pugh wrote:
This thread
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 12:38:38 -0600
From: Sebastian Kuzminsky s...@highlab.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Question on
On Sun, 16 Mar 2014, andy pugh wrote:
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 13:52:25 +
From: andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] PID bidirectional pins.
On 16
On Sun, 16 Mar 2014, Michael Haberler wrote:
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 23:16:59 +0100
From: Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] PID bidirectional
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014, Michael Haberler wrote:
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 09:59:52 +0100
From: Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] reports on rt-preempt / latency-test: max jitter
going down
could the
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014, Michael Haberler wrote:
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 17:40:19 +0100
From: Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at
To: Peter C. Wallace p...@mesanet.com,
EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] reports on rt-preempt / latency-test: max
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, Jon Elson wrote:
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 20:58:30 -0600
From: Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] configs/ structure
On
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014, Marius Alksnys wrote:
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:55:37 +0200
From: Marius Alksnys marius.alks...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-developers] THC functionality
Features I lack
On Sun, 1 Dec 2013, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 17:30:02 -0500
From: Robert Ellenberg rwe...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Initial tests of
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 15:22:24 -0500
From: Robert Ellenberg rwe...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Initial tests of
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Marius Alksnys wrote:
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 18:53:03 +0200
From: Marius Alksnys marius.alks...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-developers] BLDC component homing to encoder
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 08:48:52 -0500
From: Stuart Stevenson stus...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC2-Users-List emc-us...@lists.sourceforge.net,
Emc2-developers
On Sat, 6 Jul 2013, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 07:14:41 -0500
From: Stuart Stevenson stus...@gmail.com
Reply-To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-us...@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC2-Users-List emc-us...@lists.sourceforge.net,
Emc2-developers
On Sat, 6 Jul 2013, andy pugh wrote:
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 20:43:53 +0100
From: andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Open Development
On 6 July 2013
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, John Kasunich wrote:
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:20:57 -0400
From: John Kasunich jmkasun...@fastmail.fm
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] 7I39HV question
On Tue, Jun 18,
, 2013, at 12:19 PM, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
I was going to ship some stuff to MPM to avoid that hassle (If this is OK
with
Stuart) I can include a 7I39LV if you want to try lower voltage more peak
current. Any other cards, just ask
More current means more torque, but since I'm going
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:56:31 -0500
From: Charles Steinkuehler char...@steinkuehler.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Peter C. Wallace p...@mesanet.com
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] 7I39HV question
-BEGIN
2013 12:06, Peter C. Wallace p...@mesanet.com wrote:
Sure I'll bring a 7I43 and a 7I90
Was that a typo for 7i80? (And if not, then a 7i80 might be
interesting to play with too)
No thats a 7I90 I can bring a couple 7I80s and a 7I76E as well
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own
On Sat, 18 May 2013, Kent A. Reed wrote:
Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 09:20:03 -0400
From: Kent A. Reed kentallanr...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-developers] on the subject of
On Sat, 16 Mar 2013, Matt Shaver wrote:
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 19:01:50 -0400
From: Matt Shaver m...@mattshaver.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] hostmot2 over spi
On Sat, 16 Mar 2013
, 27 Feb 2013 21:07:06 -0800 (PST)
Peter C. Wallace p...@mesanet.com wrote:
It should be noted that while ISE versions 9 and 10 may build Spartan
3 bitfiles, there is a fair chance that they will not work, so its
best to use the lastest for Spartan 3 and
I'm going to get through the whole
problem
Peter C. Wallace wrote:
It should be noted that while ISE versions 9 and 10 may build Spartan 3
bitfiles, there is a fair chance that they will not work, so its best to use
the lastest for Spartan 3 and
Hm, interesting. I'm using ise 10.1 to build bitfiles for Stpartan 3A
and 3AN
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013, Matt Shaver wrote:
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:16:13 -0500
From: Matt Shaver m...@mattshaver.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Motherboard Suggestions Needed
On Wed,
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013, Matt Shaver wrote:
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 22:41:59 -0500
From: Matt Shaver m...@mattshaver.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] hostmot2-firmware build problem
On Wed,
I see quite a few potential users for such a HAL/RTAPI package; of course it
isnt impossible right now, as you say, but the fact that it is integrated
with linuxcnc brings not only baggage with it. I would think few people
outside the Linuxcnc community are actually aware of separate
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013, John Kasunich wrote:
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 17:08:37 -0500
From: John Kasunich jmkasun...@fastmail.fm
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] custom EDM
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013, Anders Wallin wrote:
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:01:15 +0200
From: Anders Wallin anders.e.e.wal...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-developers] SPI, Smart Serial,
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013, Andy Pugh wrote:
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 15:12:03 +0100
From: Andy Pugh bodge...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] proposed patch for v2.5_branch:
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Chris Radek wrote:
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 11:54:33 -0600
From: Chris Radek ch...@timeguy.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] proposed patch for v2.5_branch:
I should note that error in ferror is -velocity*sampleperiod (not
-velocity/sampleperiod)
Also this error is not specific to torque mode drives, its just more easily
hidden with velocity mode drives (with FF1).
It will always show up if sufficient integral term is used that the PID error
On Fri, 28 Dec 2012, Michael Haberler wrote:
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 21:51:20 +0100
From: Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-developers] PCI drivers: roundup of
On Fri, 28 Dec 2012, Michael Haberler wrote:
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 01:48:34 +0100
From: Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] PCI drivers:
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012, Anders Wallin wrote:
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:09:02 +0200
From: Anders Wallin anders.e.e.wal...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] trying out
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012, Anders Wallin wrote:
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 23:00:13 +0200
From: Anders Wallin anders.e.e.wal...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] trying out
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012, Anders Wallin wrote:
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 22:17:09 +0200
From: Anders Wallin anders.e.e.wal...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] trying out
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 17:57:17 -0800 (PST)
From: Peter C. Wallace p...@mesanet.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] trying out
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Andreas Strecker wrote:
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 21:00:23 +0100
From: Andreas Strecker astra...@gmx.de
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Emc-developers Digest, Vol 80,
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, Kent A. Reed wrote:
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:03:11 -0500
From: Kent A. Reed kentallanr...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Preview: LinuxCNC 2.5
On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, Gene Heskett wrote:
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 12:07:45 -0400
From: Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] ferror calculation incorrect in motion
On
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, EBo wrote:
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 09:47:30 -0400
From: EBo e...@sandien.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] ferror calculation incorrect in motion
This is exactly why I
causing a large indicated ferror (that is
basically impossible to tune out)
On 11/1/2012 9:09 AM, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, EBo wrote:
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 09:47:30 -0400
From: EBo e...@sandien.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: emc
in motion
On 1 November 2012 16:52, Peter C. Wallace p...@mesanet.com wrote:
Where this bug really causes problems is when you have a decent sized
integral
term so the integral part of the PID loop can track motion and null any PID
error when slewing, therefore causing a large indicated ferror
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 12:25:31 -0500
From: Stuart Stevenson stus...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] ferror calculation incorrect in
After spending some forum time trying to help a customer with tuning a torque
mode drive, I have noticed that ferror is calculated incorrectly and if
minimized will result in less than optimum actual error.
The error appears to be that ferror is calculated before the trajectory is
calculated
in motion
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012, at 10:28 PM, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
After spending some forum time trying to help a customer with tuning a
torque
mode drive, I have noticed that ferror is calculated incorrectly and if
minimized will result in less than optimum actual error.
The error appears
19:28:30 -0700 (PDT), Peter C. Wallace wrote:
After spending some forum time trying to help a customer with tuning
a torque
mode drive, I have noticed that ferror is calculated incorrectly and
if
minimized will result in less than optimum actual error.
The error appears to be that ferror
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012, andy pugh wrote:
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 16:21:46 +0100
From: andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] future plannig was: LinuxCNC
I'm back again.
Maybe the cart is creeping ahead of the horse. ... just visualize that!
Re' the post by Peter about MW525's being limited to 1.25 KHz cycle rate
and this seems to be a trend in intel processors being less and less
suited to rt maybe it is time to find a new architecture
/9 Peter C. Wallace p...@mesanet.com
It gets
noticable worse when the screen is re-drawn. I do not know why the latency
test does not see this.
Have you tried it with AXIS only?
I also noticed strange RT errors with D525MW but did not know the reason.
This was with AXIS if thats what you
While testing our maximum SSerial update rates, (linuxCNC 2.5.1 Ubuntu 10.4) I
noticed something somewhat interesting/disturbing about latency test on the
servo thread on my Atom 330 based motherboard (Jetway). After disabling
hyperthreading in the BIOS and adding the isolcpus=1 line to
On Thu, 31 May 2012, andy pugh wrote:
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 18:10:39 +0100
From: andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] CSMIO Eth motion controller +
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, Jon Elson wrote:
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:41:34 -0500
From: Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] [!! SPAM] Re: I am new here
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, Kent A. Reed wrote:
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:13:27 -0400
From: Kent A. Reed knbr...@erols.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-developers] The preempt_RT vs RTAI question
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:46:48 -0500
From: Charles Steinkuehler char...@steinkuehler.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Peter C. Wallace p...@mesanet.com
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] The preempt_RT vs RTAI
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:42:05 -0500
From: Charles Steinkuehler char...@steinkuehler.net
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] The
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Jan de Kruyf wrote:
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:34:16 +0200
From: Jan de Kruyf jan.de.kr...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] [!! SPAM] Re: I am new
data with
datawidth=32
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 06:29:49PM -0800, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
147 case 0x06: // byte stream
148 buff = *pin-u32_pin ((1 conf-DataLength) - 1);
149 break;
Hm, perhaps this is the correct replacement:
buff = *pin-u32_pin (0xu (32
On Sun, 5 Feb 2012, Michael Haberler wrote:
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 16:04:40 +0100
From: Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: s...@highlab.com, EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] hm2
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:17:54 -0700
From: Sebastian Kuzminsky s...@highlab.com
To: andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com
Cc: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] hm2 watchdog changes
On 01/24/2012 03:15
changes
On Jan 24, 2012, at 09:02 , Peter C. Wallace wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
That makes some sense, but I'm think there are sensible configs where
you never read and sensible configs where you never write (stepper-only
machines with no home switches, using hm2
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012, Kent A. Reed wrote:
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:28:23 -0500
From: Kent A. Reed knbr...@erols.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-developers] What are the new names of
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, andy pugh wrote:
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:18:10 +
From: andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-developers] Encoder Diagnostics
After finding
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011, Chris Morley wrote:
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 03:40:27 +
From: Chris Morley chrisinnana...@hotmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC DEV emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] hostmot2 repository
On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, andy pugh wrote:
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 19:29:23 +
From: andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-developers] Single-wire encoders
Vehicle engines
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Chris Morley wrote:
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 07:20:43 +
From: Chris Morley chrisinnana...@hotmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC DEV emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-developers] 5i20 mux encoder firmware error
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011, Andrew wrote:
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 20:39:06 +0200
From: Andrew parallel.kinemat...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Linear scales
2011/11/1
Peter C. Wallace p...@mesanet.com
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011, Andrew wrote:
I just wonder if 7i39 can work with linear motors without Hall sensors?
The
motor manual says digital or analog Hall sensors are optional.
Should be able to do this with the BLDC component, as actual
commutation is alway
Peter C. Wallace p...@mesanet.com
Another important question. The motor's manual says continuous current is
2.3A, peak current 6.9A, resistance 3.4 Ohm, inductance 1.2 mH.
Can I estimate required supply voltage from these data? Peak speed is
near
1 m/s.
No, the missing parameter is the V/(M/S
Peter C. Wallace p...@mesanet.com
Should I just multiply 5.9 * 1m/s to get the voltage or it's more
complicated and other parameters involved?
Since that is RMS you need the Square root of 2 in there so 8.3V minimum.
but
you also need to get the peak current through the winding resistance
On Sun, 2 Oct 2011, Jon Elson wrote:
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 21:01:26 -0500
From: Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Single-precision datatype
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Chris Morley wrote:
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 06:39:40 +
From: Chris Morley chrisinnana...@hotmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC DEV emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] hostmot2 stepgen bug
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, s...@highlab.com wrote:
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 21:48:28 -0600
From: [utf-8] s...@highlab.com s...@highlab.com
To: [utf-8] Peter C. Wallace p...@mesanet.com,
[utf-8] EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject:
=?utf-8?B
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:09:43 -0600
From: Sebastian Kuzminsky s...@highlab.com
To: Peter C. Wallace p...@mesanet.com
Cc: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re:
On Sep 28, 2011, at 08:10 , Peter C. Wallace wrote
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Chris Morley wrote:
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 01:43:09 +
From: Chris Morley chrisinnana...@hotmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC DEV emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-developers] FW: [Emc-users] bug(s) in
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Chris Morley wrote:
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 04:24:40 +
From: Chris Morley chrisinnana...@hotmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC DEV emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-developers] hostmot2 stepgen bug
From
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011, Chris Morley wrote:
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 09:57:03 +
From: Chris Morley chrisinnana...@hotmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC DEV emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-developers] servo scale setting questions
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011, Chris Morley wrote:
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 20:38:41 +
From: Chris Morley chrisinnana...@hotmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC DEV emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] servo scale setting
On Sat, 3 Sep 2011, andy pugh wrote:
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 11:52:02 +0100
From: andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] [Emc-commit] v2.5_branch: Don't
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 21:02:43 -0600
From: Sebastian Kuzminsky s...@highlab.com
To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: emc-com...@lists.sourceforge.net,
Peter C. Wallace git-...@git.linuxcnc.org
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] [Emc
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011, Chris Morley wrote:
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 04:29:20 +
From: Chris Morley chrisinnana...@hotmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC DEV emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] 7i48 mux encoder numbering
101 - 200 of 248 matches
Mail list logo
