I Concur, I’ve only been asked to do this test by a manufacturer.
Sincerely,
Derek.
> On Feb 2, 2021, at 10:14 AM, David Schaefer
> <12867effceb4-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org> wrote:
>
> HI James,
>
> In my experience ISO 7637-3 is only required by manufacturer specifications –
> Vol
equipment we plan
to certify.
I would appreciate any guidance on the legal side of e-mark testing needed by a
test lab outside of Europe.
Thanks,
Derek Walton
SSCLabs
Reno, NV, USA
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety
Amund Westin
> Sent: 28 November 2020 09:43
> To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: [PSES] SV: [PSES] Thoughts on what may be the emission source
>
> Derek,
>
> 240/480MHz sound like USB 2.0 High speed It's 4 USB-ports on the RPi ?
>
> Br
> Amund
>
Hi Folks,
I’m working on a product containing a Raspberry PI as the main controller. I
see two very strong emissions at about 240 MHz and 480 MHz. They are obviously
related.
I’ve discounted video, but not having any details on the board it’s making it
hard to pin down the source. Anybody mak
Well, I used to install it, what’s up?
Derek.
Sent from my iPad Pro
On May 5, 2020, at 3:56 PM, Mike Violette, P.E. wrote:
Michael Violette, P.E.
Director
American Certification Body
mi...@wll.com
+1 240-401-1388
-
This mess
HI folks,
I’ve been asked if there are any EMC requirements on induction motors.
Personally I’ve had mixed experience with these, orientation has proved
important to not making any emissions.
My gut feel is that they should be inherently quiet and also immune, but is
there anything formal in t
HI folks,
I have been asked to test an Apple iPad charger for RE102.
I would rather not have a real iPad, but would like to have a dummy load. Can
anyone tell me if there is something like that already out there please.
Just adding resistors isn’t adequate I think because some smart communicati
want to reply to the group.
Thanks,
Derek Walton
SSCLabs.com
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
All emc-pstc postings are
Oh Boy Elliott,
you’ll get a few answers here, lol.
My 10 cents is that when you are not discharging each time you are adding more
and more charge to the isolated control, that eventually will snap over At that
point you are discharging quite a significantly higher level of chart than an
indiv
Hi Folks,
just a quick comment on the LED lights. ANSI has been working hard ( there are
some tricky issues ) to issue C63.29 which will help eliminate a lot of LED
lighting issues. If anyone is curious, I can direct them to the appropriate
committee contact point to learn whats going on.
Chee
Hi All,
Well, this seems like here we go again. Not you Doug, just to be clear.
I have long since had a problem with the standards world where they focus on a
“test” rather than addressing the REAL PROBLEM.
I’ll give $100 right now to the three people who can shuffle the carpet,
discharge into
Hi All,
I’m Running an ISO 7637-2 Pulse 2b test, but in accordance with Section 21 of
JDQ202.
There are a few differences, and one that’s perplexing me is the term Pulse
cycle time in the JDQ document.
Pulse 2b is rather a long pulse lasting about 2 1/2 seconds. It is simulating
some of the
tically there will always be
> deficiencies until an auditor or a knowledgeable person speaks up.
>
> You'll probably put me on the same side as Ken and Ghery.
> But that's okay, I'll be glad to be there.
>
> Manny Barron
>
>
>
>
> From:
quipment into the test chamber.
>
> It would appear that the selected test lab was just not ready for prime time.
>
>
> Ed Price
> WB6WSN
> Chula Vista, CA USA
>
> From: DEREK WALTON [mailto:00734758d943-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org
> <mailto:007347
Interesting discussion, not surprising I have a little empathy, and a whole
slew of disagreement with both Ken and Ghery ( both Chaps I have a lot of
respect for ) on this one.
How best to respond is the question?
Cheers,
Derek Walton.
> On Apr 17, 2019, at 1:12 PM, Bill Stumpf wr
Hi All,
I’m looking for a source for Sheet resistor material. So far my internet
searching has pulled up nothing, can anyone give me some pointers?
Thanks,
Derek.
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
Hi All,
I totally agree with Ken, folks are totally trying to over think this.
Just shine incandescents so the inventor can run. The panel will not generate
any noise.
Cheers,
Derek Walton.
> On Feb 14, 2019, at 8:41 PM, Ken Javor wrote:
>
> OK, but why? It’s an EMI test, not
Good day folks,
does anyone have a copy of this KDB they can forward please. I made the mistake
of relying on the US government to host the information.
Thanks,
Derek.
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering So
Thoughts always welcome.
Cheers,
Derek Walton
LF Research/SSCLabs.
Reno, NV.
Sent from my iPad Pro
On Jan 2, 2019, at 11:13 PM, John Woodgate wrote:
I feel sure that
"When testing line to ground, the lines are tested singly in sequence, if there
is no other
specification."
is a
ence calibrations'
> and they are always on top of the reference plane.
>
> (P.S. I looked to the pictures of the 2013 version of the standard)
>
> Greetings,
> Bart
>
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: DEREK WALTON <00734758d943-dmarc-requ...@ie
Good day folks,
I’m re-educating myself on EN61000-4-6 and looking at the section discussing
150 Ohm to 50 Ohm adaptors I am curious why the series 100 Ohm resistor is
added on the “Outside” of the reference plane for the EM Clamp and on the
“Inside” of the reference plane for the CDN. For exam
es www.woodjohn.uk <http://www.woodjohn.uk/>
> Rayleigh, Essex UK
> On 2018-12-27 21:22, DEREK WALTON wrote:
>> Good day folks,
>>
>> I was wondering if anyone has the user manual for the NSG600. I’ve tried
>> Teseq/Schaffner but most people that might have
Fischer connectors and I’m trying to figure
the way it was intended to connect.
Anyone throw any light on this?
Thanks and Happy New Year!
Cheers,
Derek Walton.
L F Research.
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering
[PSES] Testing comparison
In message <8d1470feaef395d-2584-1c...@webmailstg-vd01.sysops.aol.com>,
dated Mon, 26 May 2014, Derek Walton
<00734758d943-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org> writes:
>I'm trying to a gap analysis for Testing done in 1999 to what they
>should be compl
aware of a summary of changes
between each version? Otherwise I see myself going through each standard one at
a time: a laborious prospect now the weathers turned nice.
I live in hope,
Thank you,
Derek Walton
L F Research
-
This
Hi Ravinder,
James's comment made me wonder about a statement you made about rise times
being the same. Are you sure what you are seeing isn't the limit of your
measuring technique? A broader noise spectrum may be due to a faster rise time
that you are not seeing in the time domain. I too have
way
to the USB connector.
How about eliminating sales taxes on one or two power supply styles, lets see
how the market reacts. I'm dammed if I want governments making choices for me!
More like 25 cents worth.
Derek Walton
-Original Message-
From: ce-test, qualified testing bv - G
Hi Cortland,
and anyone else who gets in this position.
First, an assessor cannot stop you using anything. The role of an assessor is
eyes and ears in a lab, not a prefect.
If an assessor thinks you are doing something wrong, or not complying, then
he/she MUST write a deficiency. To do so,
Do you need an Accredited Calibration, or just NIST traceable?
Cheers,
Derek.
-Original Message-
From: Pat Lawler
To: EMC-PSTC
Sent: Mon, Mar 3, 2014 12:20 pm
Subject: [PSES] Schaffer surge generator
All,
I need to calibrate our Schaffer NSG2050/PNW2055 surge generator. Two cal
p two, mainly one is used below a
GHz, the other could be used up to 40 GHz.
I'd be grateful for folks that share there positive and negative experiences
with different types and suppliers. Off list might be best, thanks.
Sincerely,
Derek Walton
L
to confidently use it. At the other extreme, a seller may
test the heck out of something, although the buyer couldn’t care less, so long
as it’s cheap.
Ed Price
WB6WSN
Chula Vista, CA USA
1961 Amphicar 770
2001 Fleetwood Storm 31W
2008 Ford Explorer
From: Derek Walton [mailto:lfresea...@aol.com
Thanks in advance,
Derek Walton
L F Research
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
All emc-pstc postings are archived and
e all ground planes connected together to provide a
good quality RF return path and minimise the chance of traces crossing plane
splits.
Many thanks
James
From: Derek Walton [mailto:lfresea...@aol.com]
Sent: 19 December 2013 16:24
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] EMC Puzzle update
First off, many thanks to all who replied on and off list.
Most of the replies we had already addressed, but here is an update.
To re-cap, we had a sealed metal box with just a power cord, and that power
cord had feed through type caps. In theory this should not radiate.
To save the agony th
oscillations/faulty parts, and what radiating mechanisms can
be uninfluenced with the protection measures I took.
Many thanks,
Derek Walton.
L F Research.
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society e
Hi Folks,
I'm trying to locate one of these discontinued amplifiers. If anyone has one
and would like to sell/rent, or knows where I can get one, can they please
contact me off list.
Thanks,
Derek Walton
-
This messa
Hi All,
I'm trying to find an email for Michael Taylor who used to be with Hach in
Colorado.
Can anyone send me his address preferably off-line.
Thanks,
Derek Walton
L F Research
-
This message is from the IEEE Pr
Doug has a point, the laws are available, and we can get access for free. The
problem is we spend our lives trying to find which laws we have to comply with,
then more than likely have lawyers try to agree what they really meant when it
was written! Time we reduced the number of laws
Derek
capacitance. In the real world, the wires leading from the power source to your
power supply will have significant inductance, and you need to be able to
function with that by making short term energy needs are available inside the
power supply.
Next opinion please :-)
Derek Walt
Subject: Re: [PSES] AF ripple in DO-160
Derek,
Check out section 16.7 control on current ripple ac/dc, power factor, harmonic
current.
Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261
From: Derek Walton
Reply-To: Derek Walton
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 23:22:35 -0400
To:
Subject: [PSES] AF ripple in DO-160
Hi Folks
ight would be most welcome.
Sincerely,
Derek Walton
L F Research EMC facility.
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
Al
HI All,
does anyone know where I can get AIR6219
The SAE site says not available for purchase right now.
Sincerely,
Derek.
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post
Hi folks.
I'm faced with helping a company meet Single Event Upset requirements for
aircraft. But our requirements are simply we should meet them
Can anyone point me to how we can show compliance
Thanks
Derek Walton
L f research
Sent from my i
HI Scott,
I'd like to reinforce what Don has said. I flew to Scotland in the early days
of CE with a product that should have aced emissions and we were worried about
susceptibility. It failed emissions and passed susceptibility. The 3 transistor
circuit was singing away around 70 MHz.
I'm a
ty cycle is low.
Quantifiable suggestions are most welcome.
Thanks,
Derek Walton
NCE #438
12790 Route 76
Poplar Grove, IL 61065, USA
W: 1 815 986 6685
M: 1 815 566 5655
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-p
lear. I want to ensure we don't over spec, and therefore over design
our "box"
Replies on or off list are most welcome.
Thanks
Derek Walton
L F Research
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Soc
Curt. I suggest Peggy Gerard of panashield. Not only the owner but
exceptionally helpful too.
Cheers
Derek
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 3, 2013, at 4:15 PM, Curt McNamara wrote:
> A customer I work with is asking about EMC chambers for investigation/debug
> of unintentional radiation (not fo
Whoa Anthony, back up a little.
Test reports can contain what the heck a lab likes, as long as interpretations
are indicated as such.
These words extracted from ISO 17025, the most common test document:
Clause 5.10 covers reporting the results:
Clause 5.10.1 The results shall be reported,
Hi Folks,
can anyone tell me a source for this document please?
Thanks,
Derek.
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
A
Well folks. I disagree. Here's why. If the power supply is used in an
application were the output is referenced to ground , you will not be stressing
the primary to secondary circuits. If your power supply isn't man enough for
this you should place warnings in your literature BEFORE purchase is
Hi all,
can anyone tell me if there is a product standard yet for professional
telescopes. What might that come under?
Looking around the CEN site I don't see anything.
Thanks,
Derek Walton
-
This message is from the
Yes, there is a linked in Teseq Compliance 5 users group
-Original Message-
From: Conway, Patrick
To: EMC-PSTC
Sent: Fri, Jan 11, 2013 3:12 pm
Subject: user's group ??
We are considering new automation tools for some of our MIL-STD-461 and DO-160
tests.
I am hoping that there are u
> 4G.
>
> Most likely it would be the frequencies certified under FCC Part 27 of the
> rules which are numerous.
>
> Larry
>
> From: Derek Walton [mailto:lfresea...@aol.com]
> Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2013 12:14 PM
> To: emc-p...@ieee.org
> Subject: iPhone
HI folks, can anyone tell me what transmit and receive frequencies my iPhone 5
uses here on the US 4G network please.
Thanks,
Derek.
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To
Sure this isn't power over Ethernet power supply?
Sent from my iPad
On Nov 27, 2012, at 14:55, Ken Javor wrote:
> Performing troubleshoot testing to CISPR type radiated emissions requirements
> without a quasi-peak detector. Seeing results of bus traffic on an Ethernet
> cable. Squeezing do
MIL STD 461 or DO-160 ), then it's appropriate to enforce. Shall Vs should,
may, could etc.
My 10 cents worth.
Derek Walton
L F Research.
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Nya
To: Cortland Richmond ; EMC- PSTC
Sent: Wed, Nov 21, 2012 1:25 am
Subject: Re: Fischer CC EM Clamp F-2
ons appreciated.
Cheers,
Derek Walton
L F Research
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
All emc-pstc postings are archived an
urces specifically regarding what the machine
should do if the light curtain is activated by a hand etc. Is terminating power
to anything making movement happen sufficient?
I hope this is not off the list topic list.
Thanks,
Derek Walton
L F Res
Perhaps. To help isolation It has several sections. Only the output end has
lower power parts
Derek
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 27, 2012, at 6:12 PM, don_borow...@selinc.com wrote:
> While the schematic may be a pi or T network, internally it may be a
> series of pi or T networks, each se
Hi Folks,
I'm looking for options, besides BRANDENBURG, for a voltmeter to measure ESD
tip voltage. Anyone care to share their experiences?
Off list response is fine.
Thanks,
Derek Walton
EMC Lab Services.
-
This messa
HI Ken,
you don't say how small and it's relative you know :-)
Any cap I suggest for across the line use I strongly recommend it has an X
rating, a Y rating if it goes between power and earth.
Is this what you were meaning?
Cheers,
Derek.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Javor
To
Hi Fred,
I think you are over reacting here a little, I don't believe anyone is saying a
TVS is a current regulator.
The TVS I'm specifically dealing with is essentially a back to back Zener diode
with the Die optimized for heat removal between two large electrodes.
You are incorrect saying
c-pstc
Cc: Derek Walton
Sent: Wed, Aug 1, 2012 3:29 pm
Subject: Re: EN 61000-4-5
If there is any sort of pulse rating of the device, the general rule of
physics is that you can safely scale the power dissipation rating during
the pulse by 1/sqrt(time ratio). For example, if your pulse is 1/4 as lo
Derek.
-Original Message-
From: Joe Randolph
To: Derek Walton ; emc-pstc
Sent: Wed, Aug 1, 2012 3:02 pm
Subject: Re: EN 61000-4-5
Hi Derek:
Are you referring to the so-called "combination wave" generatorthat has an open
circuit voltage waveform of 1.2x50 uS and a shortcircuit waveform of 8
Hi folks,
I'm trying to determine the maximum current that a TVS can cope with for the EN
61000-4-5 pulse. Very few data sheets provide this and calculating it is not
possible because device construction enters the equation.
Does anyone have any data on TVS current ability during the surge?
Hi Folks,
I'm trying to remember the requirements for an EMC plan from the Directive. Is
there a formal discussion of this document anywhere?
Thanks,
Derek Walton
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engine
itself.
Know anybody that might be able to lay their hands on a copy of this for me?
Cheers,
Derek Walton
L F Research
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a
Hi Jim,
I back what Ken says. But, for those of us that use real computers, MAC's, you
may want to consider filemaker.
http://www.filemaker.com/
Sincerely,
Derek.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Wyatt
To: Goedderz, Jim
Cc: EMC-PSTC
Sent: Fri, Jun 29, 2012 10:42 am
Subject: Re:
b-1a0c-d...@webmail-stg-d14.sysops.aol.com>,
dated Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Derek Walton writes:
>So, does this mean that magnetic metals can be used if they are over
>0.65 mm?
It's just not clear. Perhaps someone who was involved in writing the
standard can help.
--
OOO -
ut in this case they shall
have at least 0.65 mm minimum thickness."
So, does this mean that magnetic metals can be used if they are over 0.65 mm?
Presumably then the concern is saturation of very thin sheets?
Sincerely,
Derek Walton
L
Derek Walton mentioned MilStds - the cost is front-loaded by U.S. tax
dollars, and as the fed government has never been accused of having a profit
motive, there is no force from the 'invisible hand' (Adam Smith) driving
high standards costs.
So... are we saying that standards a
elping?
Cheers,
Derek.
-Original Message-
From: McInturff, Gary
To: 'Derek Walton'
Cc: 'don.g...@alcatel-lucent.com' ;
'EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG'
Sent: Tue, May 8, 2012 1:49 pm
Subject: RE: [PSES] e-standard.org "The cheapest standards in the
n even get an actor to read me the book and still magnitudes of order
> difference. So I always suffer sticker shock when I hunting for standards.
>
> As I understand the price supports the standards activities – which is the
> reason I buy from legitimate sources.
>
&g
Always one to buck the trend, I think these are reasonable prices
We are ripped off by standards bodies left right and centre
MHO
Derek
Sent from my iPhone
On May 8, 2012, at 10:05 AM, "McInturff, Gary"
wrote:
> Would appear the real pirates are at UL and BSI
>
> Gary
>
> From: Don Gie
HI All,
I've watched may people speculate about PED's and what they MAY do, so I
decided to go in the lab and make some measurements on my new iPad.
Obviously conducted is not an option, there's no power cord.
For radiated emissions to 1 GHz, the device is as quiet as a mouse. It
was only a
t;
is about 20mins either side of the flight - not too bad.
Best Regards
Charles Grasso
Compliance Engineer
Echostar Communications
(w) 303-706-5467
(c) 303-204-2974
(t) 3032042...@vtext.com
(e) charles.gra...@echostar.com
(e2) chasgra...@gmail.com
-Original Message-
From: Derek Walton [
Hi Chas,
as a frequent flier, that take off and taxi period can be many many
minutes... and has taken hours at which time a PED would be most welcome.
Derek.
On 3/19/2012 10:30 AM, Grasso, Charles wrote:
Hello Ken - I agree with your position. Turning off edevices
for a few minutes in a flig
If we set aside the aircraft interference issues, MHO is that for the
take off and landing you really need folks in a state of "get me the
heck out of here" should a problem arise, and part of that is being
aware of surroundings and listening to the crew. Distracted by any means
maybe not a goo
nterested if this is normal?
In the past I have noticed brush noise get lower as brushes bed in, so
this is little surprising.
Would anyone care to share their thoughts please?
Thanks,
Derek Walton
L F Research.
-
This message is f
Hi Folks,
I have a couple of field probes requiring battery replacement, can
anyone suggest a 3rd party replacement service please...
Thanks,
Derek Walton.
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc
.
Having learned the hard way, I use an 8568B for conducted emissions, and
save my 8566B for radiated emissions. Suggest you get a low cost
SA/receiver for making CE measurements.
Happy holidays everyone.
Derek Walton.
On 12/27/2011 2:13 PM, doug...@gmail.com wrote:
The CISPR 16, 5 uH L
Hi Mac,
NVLAP requires that you follow Annex B of NIST HB-150. An accredited
calibration is not the only way, just the "lazy" way.
Are you sure you need to record these parameters? If your standard has
no limits, then quite possibly you could argue out of recording them.
I'm not a fan of doi
Hi Doug,
I guess I find this nonsense. ANYTHING abused looks dangerous.
More examples of Nanny state control.
Cheers,
Derek.
On 11/14/2011 4:13 PM, dougp01 wrote:
Never heard of this in Europe, for N.A. look at this video.
http://www.ul.com/global/eng/pages/offerings/perspectives/consumer
Hi Jim,
Thanks for this background, it helps understand where the IEEE are
involved. While it sounds like some good changes have happened in how
the main IEEE looks at Society's, it highlights significant effort is
still required to get in line with efficient operating.
At the EMC show I'll d
delete.
Sincerely,
Derek Walton.
Ted Eckert wrote:
> This list is to address regulations regarding EMC and product safety. I
> agree with Lee that the topic is straying too far from the central purpose of
> the list.
>
> I have no objection to the free discussion of various
Hi all,
Can anyone advise on the implementation dates for EN55022:2006 (w/
Addendum for emission measurements >1GHz) for the EU, Taiwan, and
Australia? My understanding is that enforcement will begin 4/1/2010 for
VCCI and 1/1/2011 for KCC.
Thank you in advance.
Derek Walton,
L F Resea
Hi All,
I've been following this thread and listening to points and
counterpoints. One thing I hear is a lot of idealism, so let me open a
different tact.
I've been in the EMC world for bout 31 years. In that time I've seen and
experienced a lot: you could argue I grew up with EMC. In these y
HI Larry,
was this really required, in 17025, or is your assessor/accrediting body
asking?
If you are following a standard calibration method, I'm not sure you are
REQUIRED for have a procedure.
That said,I believe strongly in writing detailed work instructions (
what we call them), photogra
HI Ed,
you should know that managers are full of hot air,and are therefore
lighter than engineers and techs
Derek
PS, folks, this was meant as a joke...
Price, Edward wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From:* emc-p...@iee
ables. I am not advocating the used of a particular brand,
just good cables.
The power to the four modules is passed through a Xantrex super
isolation transformer also: just cos'.
Seasons greetings,
Derek Walton
L F Research
Pettit, Ghery wrote:
>
> I would. Shielding of receivers is
Good morning all,
I was wondering if anyone had experience with using Solars 9616-1 and
9616-2 coupling probes.
Maybe of line responses would be best, they certainly would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Derek Walton
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc
ep forward would be good. Redirecting to
somewhere else is, in my opinion, not good
Regardless, love the list and it's members!
Derek Walton
L F Research.
Peter Tarver wrote:
> I oppose posts in anything other than plain text. The
> expansion to html formatted posts has already led
.com>, dated Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Derek
> Walton writes:
>
>
>> Alas, since I have to work, I cant be on all committees
>
> No, you as a test-house cant, but manufacturers have more resources,
> and really need to make sure that they CAN protect their interests by
>
Hi Everyone,
thank you for the valuable insight
Alas, since I have to work, I cant be on all committees
But now I have a start at least!
Sincerely,
Derek Walton
John Woodgate wrote:
> In message <4900d68f.2090...@aol.com>, dated Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Derek
> Walton writes:
Good day folks,
I've been asked to quote testing to EN 13309:2009, but I cant find
record of it in my usual places ( BSi )
Can anyone point me where I can get a copy, or a draft version please.
Thanks,
Derek Walton
L F Research
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engine
acceptable...
Best regards,
Derek Walton
L F Research
Bill Stumpf wrote:
> Both answers are correct, but also the term Fully Anechoic Chamber
> raises a flag. The FCC does not allow the use of fully anechoic
> chambers for emissions testing (30MHz - 1000MHz). Reference ANSI
>
Hi Pat,
Yes, NVLAP is under NIST.
A good contact there is Brad Moore.
Brad Moore
Cheers,
Derek Walton
L F Research
pat.law...@slpower.com wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> The link you gave doesn't give you the NVLAP web site, but just a
> domain name holder.
> NVLAP appears
k's
> statements.
>
> Derek Walton wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Part of the reproduction process is un-encoding the cell structure
>> from the DNA, and that is influenced by fields which if great enough
>> cause non intended cell structure. Usually the fields a
m not sure yet how much of that is public domain.
Again, I stress this comes from an aging guy... I may be remembering
incorrectly, or understood the explanation wrong.
We live in interesting times.
Cheers,
Derek Walton
L F Research
Lothar Schmidt wrote:
>
> Just for clarification,
>
Does anyone know more about the research spoken about in the BBC news
artical?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7523109.stm
Is it really new unpublisged research or just rehashing the old?
Sincerely,
Derek Walton L F Research
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo