[PSES] SV: [PSES] Korea KN 32

Korea generally requires in country testing. Or testing by a limited number of approved labs out of the country. And tested with 220VAC, 60Hz. Regards Amund Fra: Vincent Lee [mailto:08e6c8d35910-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org] Sendt: 31. januar 2017 22:09 Til: EMC-PSTC

Re: [PSES] Korea KN 32

day, January 31, 2017 10:52 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Korea KN 32 Hello Dieter, My experience with Korea is that they only accept 10 meter measurements even for KN 32. Not sure where you can get a Korean Standard in English. I doubt if they are available unless you have

Re: [PSES] Korea KN 32

Hello Dieter, My experience with Korea is that they only accept 10 meter measurements even for KN 32. Not sure where you can get a Korean Standard in English. I doubt if they are available unless you have it translated of course. Regards, Mark Schmidt From: Paasche, Dieter [mailto:dieter.paas

Re: [PSES] Korea KN 32

In our experience no. It's 10m only. Julian Jones Hursley EMC On 31 Jan 2017, at 21:09, Vincent Lee <08e6c8d35910-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org<mailto:08e6c8d35910-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org>> wrote: South Korea KN standards are in Korean language. The English translation i

Re: [PSES] Korea KN 32

South Korea KN standards are in Korean language.  The English translation is not of much use during dispute. It is the Korean one that prevail. Regards, Vincent From: "Paasche, Dieter" To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 11:40 PM Subject: [PSES] K

[PSES] Korea KN 32

Hi group, CISPR 32 allows class A products to be tested at 3m. Would KN 32 accept it as well? I appreciate it If anybody can let me know where I can get a copy of KN 32 in English. Thanks. Sincerely, Dieter Paasche Advanced Product Developer, Electrical CHRISTIE 809 Wellington Street North

[PSES] 60601-1-2 Radiated Emission Measurement Distance per Japan PMDA and Korea MFDA

Dear Members, Is radiated emission test data taken at 3 meter measurement distance accepted by Japan Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) and Korea Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS)? Thank you very much for your time and I look forward to hearing from you. Best regards, Grace

Re: [PSES] Korea Approval Product Search

try https://fccid.io/KCC.php From: Sam Yogasuntharam Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 12:45 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Korea Approval Product Search Hi, I can go to UL website "Online Certificaten Directory" and see wha

[PSES] Korea Approval Product Search

Hi, I can go to UL website "Online Certificaten Directory" and see what products are approved by UL Similarly, I can go to CQC, Intertek, FCC... and check certified product or check the validity of certification. Is there is a Korean website I can go to and check the KCC ID number whether

Re: [PSES] EMC requirements for Korea

You'll need translation of some documents, but the test house I use provides that as well. From: Robert Dunkerley [mailto:robert.dunker...@snellgroup.com] Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 1:25 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] EMC requirements for Korea Hi all, Thanks fo

Re: [PSES] EMC requirements for Korea

: Robert Dunkerley Subject: RE: EMC requirements for Korea Hi Rob, Not sure what your equipment is, but for IT equipment, testing to S. Korean standards at a RRA accredited test house is mandatory. S. Korea does have a MRA in place with the US so there are accredited labs available. Standards

Re: [PSES] EMC requirements for Korea

Hi Rob, You really have to clarify in your question the types of products you plan to sell in South Korea and the location from where you are applying. For information technology products developed in USA, the process for obtaining Korea MSIP approval is relatively easy. Most accredited USA

Re: [PSES] EMC requirements for Korea

In message utlook.com>, dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015, Brian Ceresney writes: Technical  communication was not possible with technical staff due to language restraints. So hire a young Japanese-speaking technician. He/she will pay for themselves very quickly. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. With bes

Re: [PSES] EMC requirements for Korea

V.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: EMC requirements for Korea Brian That has not been my experience in the past with Japan via VCCI. One joins with VCCI as an associate(?) or something and they will then take reports from you, but the labs VCCI registration numbers need to be included. I sent the data and

Re: [PSES] EMC requirements for Korea

[mailto:bceres...@delta-q.com] Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 9:43 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] EMC requirements for Korea Hi Rob, With regards to your last statement - Japan also will retest EMC at their in-country lab, in spite of an accompanying EMC test report. I susp

Re: [PSES] EMC requirements for Korea

Hi Rob, With regards to your last statement - Japan also will retest EMC at their in-country lab, in spite of an accompanying EMC test report. I suspect that there are other such countries as well. Also, be prepared for a long wait in Korea and Japan, while the testing is done, and results

Re: [PSES] EMC requirements for Korea

Also of note regrading Korea, they are very particular and demand 10m measurements and must be tested at the national power grid values of 220V 60Hz. This makes most FCC and or CE test reports of no value Rodney Davis Regulatory Compliance Engineering Phone: DID 613-691-3468 350 Legget Drive

Re: [PSES] EMC requirements for Korea

Hi Rob, South Korea has their own Emissions and Immunity specs (KN Series), which are equivalent to EN specs with some minor differences (test voltage etc.). Accredited test labs will test the equipment to KN specs, and generate the report, which is then submitted to Korean compliance agency

[PSES] EMC requirements for Korea

Hi, Has anyone had experience of the EMC requirements for selling goods to South Korea? There is conflicting information online on what is actually required. I always thought if you had CE and FCC covered, that would pretty much cover you for most of the world? Thanks Rob. This

[PSES] Korea KCC/RRA approvals

Hi Group, I am working with a client where we have an EMC lab that has ISO 17025 approvals. We need to get a few products certified by RRA for EMC. Does anyone gone through the process of getting a product directly certified rather than going through 3rd party labs? What is the process? how

[PSES] Importer on Record in Korea required for 12vdc adapter

Folks,   we are trying to get a 12VDC adapter certified for KC in Korea. our power adapter vendor has asked us to give them in-country rep for Korea?   Can someone share their experience about this new KC rule for dc adapter certification in Korea?   I was aware of Japan Meti process for IoR as

[PSES] Korea Approval Requirements for IEC 61010-1 equipment

Hi, what are the key differences to the European EMCD, LVD requirements? Which documents are required? CB test report will be accepted? Is the KC mark mandatory for lab. equipment? Is a local rep. mandatory? Any other local characteristics? The product is EN 61010-1/EN 61326-1 tested/approv

Re: [PSES] Korea standards in English

Grace, So this begs the question. Why do we even have an MRA with Korea if all these roadblocks are presented to USA labs? Personally, I think that if this is going to be the case, then no Korean labs should be able to submit wireless products to the FCC, until Korea loosens their

Re: [PSES] Korea standards in English

David, If you are not a testing lab offering testing services per Korean regulations, it is easier for you to send your products to Korea, directly or indirectly. Korea requires test reports in Korean, confirmed by an NIST official last year. Korean test standards (EMC, Radio, Safety) are

[PSES] Korea standards in English

All,   I am trying to find a reliable source for Korean standards in English.  So far I can only get them in Korean, then would have to pay to have them translated(which is quite expensive).  I know many other people must be testing for Korea.  Where do you get your standards?   Thanks

Re: [PSES] Sanity check - Korea please

Korea absolutely will not accept their report. Up until a few years ago, all testing for Korea had to be done in country. Now there is a mutual recognition agreement with them that allows testing at approved labs that are accredited to the appropriate KN standards. The KN standards also

Re: [PSES] Sanity check - Korea please

There are a number of problems with this request in addition to the 14 year old data. The last I reviewed the Korea requirements, though very close to the EN requirements, there were differences, and the testing must be done at a lab recognized by Korea – some are located in Canada and the US

Re: [PSES] Sanity check - Korea please

Last I heard, Korea is an in country test, or one of a very few external approved labs. Don't take any more calls from the customer, unless it is prefaced with a request for a quote for the new testing required. > > From: Ron Pickard RPQ >T

Re: [PSES] Sanity check - Korea please

Hi Gary, Korea aside, how would a 14 yr old EU/CE EMC test report still provide a presumption of conformity with the current EMC or R&TTE Directives as their lists of harmonized standards are regularly revised/updated? Given the EU standards you're referencing, I assume that the p

[PSES] Sanity check - Korea please

I have a customer with a EMC test about 14 years old now - and it was done to US and EU requirements 55022 55024 etc. They now have a requirement for Korea and are insisting that Korean approval can be gained without a Korean acceptance of the test - which requires documented evidence that the

Re: [PSES] Change to EMC regulation in South Korea on Audio Products?

In message , dated Tue, 10 Jul 2012, "Huang, Tim" writes: For a non-wireless audio product, you have to do KN22 and KN24, KN60065 (equivalent to EN55022 and EN55024) so as to obtain KC certification. That seems to be very confusing. '60065' is a number associated with a safety standard, no

Re: [PSES] Change to EMC regulation in South Korea on Audio Products?

Exactly. We have a lot of audio products to do KC compliance in South-Korea. For a non-wireless audio product, you have to do KN22 and KN24, KN60065 (equivalent to EN55022 and EN55024) so as to obtain KC certification. For a wireless(e.g wifi, BT)audio product, you have to do KN22, KN24, KN300328

[PSES] Change to EMC regulation in South Korea on Audio Products?

Greetings from Berkeley, I am writing to ask if any other manufactures have been ask to do additional EMC testing on audio products in South Korea. The agent I use is saying that testing just a representative model will not be allowed and I will now need to test each model, which for me is

Re: [PSES] Question about unlicensed bands in Korea

Best find what the cellular frequencies in Korea are. If they are anything like the North-American ones (does a NA cellphone works in Korea?), then you are out of luck and will need to negotiate with the carrier that holds the license for that frequency/location. >From dealing with a simi

[PSES] FWD: Question about unlicensed bands in Korea

Found this question posted on the Usenet group, sci.electronics.design, and thought someone here could answer best. Regards, Robert =-=-= From: fasf Date: Jun 4, 3:58 am Hi, i have a wireless product made for european market at 868MHz. I want to show this product in a korean exibition: i ca

Re: [PSES] South Korea KCC connector approval

The Korea standard number is NRRA notice number 2009-38 (Technical Criteria for Terminal Equipment). I'm told it is TIA-1096-A repackaged. I don't think the 2009 in the standard number means it was required for 3 years as I've just had it enforced on our products for

Re: [PSES] South Korea KCC connector approval

-Original Message- From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Dan Roman Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 6:59 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: South Korea KCC connector approval Hi, I'm looking for a lab that can do the testing to the new KCC RJ conn

[PSES] South Korea KCC connector approval

Hi, I'm looking for a lab that can do the testing to the new KCC RJ connector requirements and give me a report I can use to self-declare with. Requirements are similar to TIA-1096-A. Anyone know of a lab that can do this in the USA? It's apparently still pretty hard to find RJ connectors tha

[PSES] Transmitter Modular Approval in Korea

Dear Members, >From a quick Google search, it seems S. Korea accepts transmitter modular approval (<http://www.nwemc.com/news/2011/02/18/korea-rra-announces-new-emc-regulations-including-new-kc-mark/> http://www.nwemc.com/news/2011/02/18/korea-rra-announces-new-emc-regulations-includi

Re: [PSES] RF Approvals expertise in Malaysia, Taiwan and Korea

to home griggs_sc...@yahoo.com From: Charlie Blackham To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2011 10:54 AM Subject: [PSES] RF Approvals expertise in Malaysia, Taiwan and Korea Group Client have RF Short Range Device (78 GHz (Tank) Level

RF Approvals expertise in Malaysia, Taiwan and Korea

Group Client have RF Short Range Device (78 GHz (Tank) Level Probing Radar) which is compliant with: · FCC Part 15C · EN 302 372 (TLPR, closed tank) · EN 302 729 (LPR, open tank) via NB opinion This frequency range/application is quite new and whilst the client has in c

RE: Power line quality in Korea

Rich, Korea is 220V at 60Hz. Voltage tolerance of +/-4 to +/-9%. Tom Smith, P.Eng Product Safety and Approvals Consultant TJS Technical Services Inc. Tel: +1 403-612-6664 / +1 205-258-1316 Email: tsm...@tjstechnical.com http://www.tjstechnical.com Follow us on Twitter: TJS_Technical

Power line quality in Korea

Hi I was wondering if anyone can tell me what the line voltage regulation for South Korea is. I'm guessing its 220V +/- 10% but have no idea where to look this up, similarly for the 60Hz frequency. Thanks in advance Rich - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering So

Korea - Assembled in...

I have been told that Korea is no longer accepting products into the country that have the label wording that says “Assembled in U.S.” (or any other country) but will accept “Produced in …” Does anyone know about this? Jim __ James L. Knighten, Ph.D. EMC Engineer

Re: US test lab -- MRA for Korea

Hi Don Try Compliance Certification Services in Fremont CA They were just acquired by UL www.ccsemc.com B Sent from my iPhone On Jan 12, 2010, at 10:19 AM, "Umbdenstock, Don" wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > Does anyone know of a lab in the US authorized to test short range > devices for the K

US test lab -- MRA for Korea

Dear Colleagues, Does anyone know of a lab in the US authorized to test short range devices for the KCC? Best regards, Don Umbdenstock Sensormatic - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to A

RE: Korea EMC

(in my opinion) should be specific to the System integrator. This is logical right? Best Regards, Mark From: peter merguerian [mailto:pmerguerian2...@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 11:17 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org; Mark Schmidt Subject: Re: Korea EMC Mark, The system

Re: Korea EMC

Mark, The system integrator can have the tests and KCC certification done as part of the system if your USB device is for use with that system only. Best Regards, Peter Merguerian --- On Wed, 4/15/09, Mark Schmidt wrote: From: Mark Schmidt Subject: Korea EMC

Korea EMC

Hello All, I am once again confused – I have a test lab indicating that we need to test to the MIC/KCC requirements for a small USB powered device. This device will be bundled by a system integrator (OEM computer manufacturer) and my understanding is that they would be responsible for the MIC/K

S. Korea External Power Supply Marking.

Good morning Looking for a link to the English translation of the recent S. Korean Energy Efficiency requirements for External Power supplies. Specifically: 1. the efficiency required for each level 1 to 5. Note that Korea has 1 as the highest efficiency, just the reverse of the

RE: Korea EMC standards

. many thanks From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Rudd, Adam Sent: 15 May 2008 17:51 To: Bill Stumpf; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: Korea EMC standards Laws and Rules (Most of

RE: Korea EMC standards

hi on this thread can anyone send me the MIC logo. many thanks From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Rudd, Adam Sent: 15 May 2008 17:51 To: Bill Stumpf; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: Korea EMC standards Laws and Rules (Most of

RE: Korea EMC standards

is in English, and might prove useful for you. “Recently revised Korea EMI_EMS standards on ITE” http://www.rrl.go.kr/join/databoard/law/view.jsp?lw_type=4&lw_seq=116 Best Regards, Adam Rudd Electrical Engineer (EMC) NCR Corporation, RHSS Duluth, GA (770) 495-

Korea EMC standards

Anyone know where I can find Korea EMC standards in English? Thanks, Bill Stumpf - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to

RE: Mobile phone killed one person in Korea

>From an AP press release: "A death originally thought to have been caused by an exploding cell phone is now being blamed on a co-worker, who confessed to making up the story after accidentally striking the victim with a drilling vehicle, South Korean police said Friday." http://www.foxnews.com/s

RE: Mobile phone killed one person in Korea

Of rn...@san.rr.com Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 3:18 AM To: 'Scott Xe'; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: Mobile phone killed one person in Korea Hello Scott: The mobile phone is not the device that explodes. The lithium-ion battery within the mobile phone is the device that expl

RE: Mobile phone killed one person in Korea

-Original Message- > From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf > Of Scott Xe > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 8:27 AM > To: emc-p...@ieee.org > Subject: RE: Mobile phone killed one person in Korea > > > Such report scares the public very much r

RE: Mobile phone killed one person in Korea

o and make sure the cells were not damaged. The other Brian From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of kazimier_gawrzy...@dell.com Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 1:13 PM To: peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: Mobile phone killed one person in

Re: Mobile phone killed one person in Korea

In message , dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007, ted.eck...@apcc.com writes: > A person on a ladder or a platform may make incidental contact with >hazardous voltage. The shock may not cause significant injury, but it >startles the person to the point where they fall. You may be interested to learn that

Re: Mobile phone killed one person in Korea

In message <474ee86d.27b38c0a.4cdd.1...@mx.google.com>, dated Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Scott Xe writes: >In last one to two years, Apply, Sony, Toshiba, Dell, etc. recalled >their batteries. All have no built-in fuse?? They probably do, but the fuse protects against short-circuiting the battery ext

RE: Mobile phone killed one person in Korea

is underway..just because it's "news". Thanks, Kaz From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Tarver, Peter Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:01 PM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: Mobile phone killed one person in Korea > From: Kazimier Gawrzyja

RE: Mobile phone killed one person in Korea

> From: Kazimier Gawrzyjal > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 8:59 AM > Also..this article alleges this poor fellow worked in a > quarry and implies he may have been near explosivesif > true and the poor chap worked in a quarry...was he carrying a > cell phone near explosives? > (usually

RE: Mobile phone killed one person in Korea

From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Scott Xe Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 8:27 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: Mobile phone killed one person in Korea Nowadays, almost everyone in city carries mobile phone like carrying your walnut. Probably, it is

RE: Mobile phone killed one person in Korea

org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Scott Xe Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 10:27 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: Mobile phone killed one person in Korea Such report scares the public very much regardless of the truth or not. At least, no one in the world says there is evidence

RE: Mobile phone killed one person in Korea

hone killed one person AM

RE: Mobile phone killed one person in Korea

Behalf Of Tarver, Peter Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 3:39 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: Mobile phone killed one person in Korea > From: Scott Xe > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 8:43 AM > > Today's TV news said a person was killed due to explosion of > his

RE: Mobile phone killed one person in Korea

> From: Scott Xe > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 8:43 AM > > Today's TV news said a person was killed due to explosion of > his mobile phone in the pocket of his jacket. The phone is > from LG. Detail investigation is undergoing. It is sad > this is the second case following the last c

RE: Mobile phone killed one person in Korea

> From: William Barry > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 9:14 AM > To: emc-p...@ieee.org > Subject: Re: Mobile phone killed one person in Korea > > http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/10/28/tech/main652128.shtml According to this article, there have been 83 incidents

Re: Mobile phone killed one person in Korea

89-6548 /W :: ul.com Ken Javor Sent by: emc-p...@ieee.org 11/28/2007 08:55 AM To cc Subject Re: Mobile phone killed one person in Korea There is nothing in a phone save the battery to “explode.” The phone would only have supplied the “shrapnel” debris. Ken Javor Phon

Re: Mobile phone killed one person in Korea

person in Korea Today’s TV news said a person was killed due to explosion of his mobile phone in the pocket of his jacket. The phone is from LG. Detail investigation is undergoing. It is sad this is the second case following the last case early this year in China. What is the current safety

Mobile phone killed one person in Korea

Today’s TV news said a person was killed due to explosion of his mobile phone in the pocket of his jacket. The phone is from LG. Detail investigation is undergoing. It is sad this is the second case following the last case early this year in China. What is the current safety standard for mobil

RE: South Korea conducted RF immunity requirements?

Thanks to all who responded. The situation with South Korea appears to be as I had heard, with requirements that are essentially identical to EN 55024. Joe Randolph Telecom Design Consultant Randolph Telecom, Inc. 781-721-2848 (USA) j...@randolph-telecom.com http://www.randolph-telecom.com

RE: South Korea conducted RF immunity requirements?

It is identical _ From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Joe Randolph Sent: 16 July 2007 21:58 To: Emc-Pstc Subject: South Korea conducted RF immunity requirements? Hello All: I had the impression that South Korea imposes a conducted RF immunity test that

RE: South Korea conducted RF immunity requirements?

load" link next to "Technical Requirements for EMS (2005.9.29). IT equipment standards for Immunity are covered in Appendix 6, pp. 32-35. The Korean standards are fairly close to the IEC versions; they drop the "IEC" and replace it with "KN", as in "KN61-4-

RE: South Korea conducted RF immunity requirements?

-telecom.com] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 1:58 PM To: Emc-Pstc Subject: South Korea conducted RF immunity requirements? Hello All: I had the impression that South Korea imposes a conducted RF immunity test that is either identical to or substantially similar to the one in EN 55024 (3 VRMS, 150

South Korea conducted RF immunity requirements?

Hello All: I had the impression that South Korea imposes a conducted RF immunity test that is either identical to or substantially similar to the one in EN 55024 (3 VRMS, 150 KHz to 80 MHz), which calls out IEC 61000-4-6 for the test procedure. I would appreciate it if someone could clarify how

Korea - emission distance extrapolation at 100 kHz

Greetings, A client wants to know if their product will pass Korean emission limits by first extrapolating the emissions our lab measured some time ago. The information I have is the measurement for Korea is done at 3 meters. In the client's case the measurement was done at 10 meter

RE: Korea WEEE/RoHS

Subject: Fw: Korea WEEE/RoHS Greetings, I am trying to obtain an English version of the proposed Korean WEEE/RoHS Regulations "The Act for Resource Recycling of Electrical/Electronic Products and Automobiles. The latest information I heard is that is is supposed to go into effect on January 1,

Fw: Korea WEEE/RoHS

Greetings, I am trying to obtain an English version of the proposed Korean WEEE/RoHS Regulations "The Act for Resource Recycling of Electrical/Electronic Products and Automobiles. The latest information I heard is that is is supposed to go into effect on January 1, 2008. Any information on w

Korea RRL approved product search - can't find it on their new website

All, I had a link to an approvals lookup page on S. Korea's RRL website that let you look up a list of approved products (it was in Korean, but I memorized the path to get what I needed). The old link was http://approval.rrl.go.kr/app_search.php It

Radio approvals in Korea, India and Japan

Who are the authorities to contact regarding radio equipment (Aeronautical equipment) approvals in Korea, India and Japan? Will a FAA / FCC notification make the approval process smoother in these countries? Thanks. Best regards Amund Westin Oslo, NORWAY

RE: Korea wiring rules/installation code

My thanks to those who replied. Regards, Peter L. Tarver, PE ptar...@ieee.org _ Scanned by Sanmina-SCI eShield ___ _ - This message is from the

RE: Korea wiring rules/installation code

Peter, Korea, in general and in my experience, accepts CE Marking in lieu of the S-Mark. This would therefore indicate EN60204-1, and more excitingly EN 60439-1 as potential solutions. The other place to look would be in the end user's purchase specification as they usually offer some guidan

RE: Korea wiring rules/installation code

in process of consulting on a field wiring compartment > > for a SEMI S2 > > evaluation, where the product will be installed in Korea. I'd > > appreciate any guidance on where to find the wiring rules for Korea in > > English. I'm doing some internet searches o

RE: Korea wiring rules/installation code

ulting on a field wiring compartment > for a SEMI S2 > evaluation, where the product will be installed in Korea. I'd > appreciate any guidance on where to find the wiring rules for Korea in > English. I'm doing some internet searches on familiar terms > and so far >

Korea wiring rules/installation code

I'm in process of consulting on a field wiring compartment for a SEMI S2 evaluation, where the product will be installed in Korea. I'd appreciate any guidance on where to find the wiring rules for Korea in English. I'm doing some internet searches on familiar terms and so far not

FW: Korea Approval In USA

_ From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of emcp...@aol.com Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 3:29 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Korea Approval In USA Hello, I wanted to share this information with the group. I found a test lab in the USA that is

Korea Approval In USA

Hello good people, Are you aware of any lab (does not have to be located in the US) that knows how to obtain the RRL and MIC approvals needed in Korea? RRL is the telecom approval for network equipment and MIC is the EMC approval for ITE. Regards, Sylvia From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p

Korea Approval In USA

Hello, I wanted to share this information with the group. I found a test lab in the USA that is designated by Korea to perform EMI/EMS testing on ITE and telecom equipment. I just completed a project with them, and it saved me both time and money by not shipping the units to Korea to be tested

S. Korea EMC Regulations

I have received conflicting information regarding what types of non-radio equipment require EMC certification (MIC) in S. Korea. It's clear that computers and computer peripherals must be certified as ITE using the S. Korean variants of CISPR 22 and CISPR 24, but it's not clear if othe

Re: Agents for Taiwan and Korea

Julian, We can serve as your Agent for Taiwan and Korea. I work for TUV Rheinland of North America and we do many BSMI and Korean MIC and KET approvals through our Taiwan offices. Question: Is your safety and emc from an accredited BSMI lab? For Korea, you may only need MIC (emc) or both

Agents for Taiwan and Korea

We are trying to find independent agents to act for our customer for BSMI certification DoC route for Taiwan and MIC for Korea. Can anyone pass me contact details . Many thanks in advance rgds, Julian Jones Hursley EMC Services Ltd Brickfield Lane, Chandlers Ford EASTLEIGH, SO53

Certification of RFID in Mexico, Brazil, and South Korea.

Good morning everyone. One of our divisions is asking about the certification - registration required for Mexico, Brazil, and South Korea on an RFID tag reader built in a new product. Very short range (about 10cm) - 120Khz. - intermittent operation. It just reads a tag to identify a sample

Re: [Fwd: EMC in Korea]

In article <4223b50f.6090...@ptcnh.net>, Scott Douglas writes >The 107A CB Bulletin for 60950-1 lists a national deviation for Korea : >Product must complies with relevant CISPR standard. The Korean National Committee should know that it is very undesirable to use one standar

[Fwd: EMC in Korea]

Subject:EMC in Korea List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 21:44:24 +0100 From: Pierre SELVA (EMITECH) To: Forum Safety-emc Dear colleagues, The 107A CB Bulletin for 60950-1 lists a national deviation for Korea : Product must complies with relevant

Re: Plug requirements for Korea

te: Hello everyone, I was hoping someone out there would have some experience with power cord plug requirements for Korea. We recently received an e-mail from our distributor who is telling us that power cord plugs/ wall type supply plugs for class II ungrounded products must comply with the Korea

Plug requirements for Korea

Hello everyone, I was hoping someone out there would have some experience with power cord plug requirements for Korea. We recently received an e-mail from our distributor who is telling us that power cord plugs/ wall type supply plugs for class II ungrounded products must comply with the

Re: ITE Requirements for Korea

above categories must be tested by an accredited laboratory (all of which are in Korea with the exception of those recognized under the Canada/Korea MRA) and submitted to the RRL for review and certification. In addition to the above, there is also a safety certification scheme (EK-Mark) for

ITE Requirements for Korea

I have a customer who wish to sell in South Korea. I have not had any dealings compliance testing for South Korea and need to point this customer in the correct direction. Thank you for your assistance. Barbara Brooks Wyle Laboratories 7800 Highway 20 West Huntsville, AL 35806 (256) 837

Re: Korea Telecom Requirements

Hi All, Canadian labs can be accredited (and I know of at least one that is) for testing to the Korean MIC requirements, under the scope of the Canada/Korea MRA. However, they are still required to test and supply reports for each of the required disciplines (as applicable - EMC, Safety, Telecom

  1   2   >