Hi All,
not to steal from Davids needs, but I’m looking for an MIL STD 461 EMI
technician that’s a US Citizen for the Oklahoma City area.
I don’t have a job positing yet, but please feel free to contact me off list
and I’ll brief more whats being looked for.
Now back to Davids needs,
Thanks
1. IEC 61000-4-18:2019 - Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) - Part 4-18:
Testing and measurement techniques - Damped oscillatory wave immunity test
2. MIL-STD 461, CS116, conducted susceptibility, damped sinusoidal
transients, cables and power
Are these two tests quite different
filtering and
> shielding from that point on. But that isn’t a typical installation, either.
>
> Ken Javor
> Phone: (256) 650-5261
>
>
> --
> *From: *Patrick
> *Date: *Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:52:00 -0700
> *To: *Ken Javor
> *Cc: *
> *Subject: *
For the record the reason that MIL-STD-461 forbids using shielded power
wires for EMI testing is because even if a particular load gets shielded
power from the pointof-distribution (circuit breaker or fuse box), that
doesn¹t means the electrical power bus between the point-of-generation
was inserted in
> “F” and retained in “G.”
>
> Ken Javor
> Phone: (256) 650-5261
>
>
>
> --
> *From: *Patrick
> *Reply-To: *Patrick
> *Date: *Tue, 15 Jan 2019 14:19:32 -0700
> *To: *
> *Subject: *Re: [PSES] MIL-STD-461 and power c
as below
and that is why the blanket prohibition against shielding was inserted in
³F² and retained in ³G.²
Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261
From: Patrick
Reply-To: Patrick
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 14:19:32 -0700
To:
Subject: Re: [PSES] MIL-STD-461 and power cables sanity check
( not really
t;
>
> *From:* Ken Javor
> *Sent:* 15 January 2019 15:34
> *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: [PSES] MIL-STD-461 and power cables sanity check
>
>
>
> The issue is with primary power: that supplied by the platform to
> electrical and electronic lo
Hi Ken,
That makes sense, thanks for the clarification.
James
From: Ken Javor
Sent: 15 January 2019 15:34
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] MIL-STD-461 and power cables sanity check
The issue is with primary power: that supplied by the platform to electrical
15 Jan 2019 08:21:24 -
To:
Subject: [PSES] MIL-STD-461 and power cables sanity check
Hello all,
MIL-STD-461 has a requirement for any conductors in a cable assembly
carrying ³primary power² i.e. AC power from a vessel distribution bus to be
separated out from the main cable bunch and routed
Hello all,
MIL-STD-461 has a requirement for any conductors in a cable assembly
carrying "primary power" i.e. AC power from a vessel distribution bus to be
separated out from the main cable bunch and routed separately in a test
setup (clause 4.3.8.6). It also states that the pri
Historical Question,
Will someone please give a little of the rationale for the changes in rev E vs
F of Table III, Susceptibility Scanning.
Thanks
Chad
Ofc: 858.762.6853 | Cel: 858.527.8149
-
This message is from the IEEE
Chad Airy asks:
Will someone please give a little of the rationale for the changes in
rev E vs F of Table III, Susceptibility Scanning.
I suspect we need look no further than Appendix A 40.3.10.4.1
(4.3.10.4.1) Frequency
Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261
From: Airy, Chad chad.a...@ga-asi.com
Reply-To: Airy, Chad chad.a...@ga-asi.com
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 16:49:47 -0800
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Conversation: Table III Susceptibility Scanning; MIL STD 461 E vs F
Subject: [PSES] Table III Susceptibility
/
P Consider the environment: do you really need to print this e mail?
-Original Message-
From: Powell, Doug [mailto:doug.pow...@aei.com]
Sent: 30 June 2008 18:44
To: david.cole...@selex-comms.com; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: MIL-STD 461 vs
as I did.
Best Regards,
Dave Coleman AIIRSM
SELEX Communications
Barker, Neil neil.bar...@e2v.com
01/07/2008 15:58
To
'Powell, Doug' doug.pow...@aei.com, david.cole...@selex-comms.com,
emc-p...@ieee.org
cc
Subject
RE: MIL-STD 461 vs. DSTAN 59-41
Also, all DEF STANs
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of
david.cole...@selex-comms.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 8:07 AM
To: Barker, Neil; 'Powell, Doug'; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: MIL-STD 461 vs. DSTAN 59-41
Has anyone got (or know of) a comparison between DEFSTAN 59-41 and MIL-STD 461
(any versions, but preferably recent), that ideally covers the Land Use
aspects of the standards?
I know the UK MoD will accept 461 tested equipment, but for an RFQ it is
better to respond with some technical
All Mil-Stds are available at http://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/
-doug
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of
david.cole...@selex-comms.com
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 2:15 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: MIL-STD 461 vs
thank you to everybody who replied me on the forum and off-list.
Now I have the standard I was looking for.
Paolo
**
Paolo Peruzzi
Esaote S.p.A.
Research Product Development - Design Quality Control
via di Caciolle, 15 I- 50127 Florence
www.emccompliance.com
on 6/12/03 9:26 AM, Paolo Peruzzi at paolo.peru...@esaote.com wrote:
Dear group,
I would like to get the old broadband and narrowband RE limit tables of the
superseded MIL STD 461C, for teaching purposes.
Could anybody tell me where to find a pdf of that
-Original Message-
From: Paolo Peruzzi [ mailto:paolo.peru...@esaote.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 6:27 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: MIL-STD 461 C
Dear group,
I would like to get the old broadband and narrowband RE limit
tables of the
superseded
Other than they are both EMC test requirements, the difference is night and
day. The MIL-STD-461 tests are:
Much more severe/sensitive
Cover much wider frequency bands
Are typically done with different equipment. The MIL Radiated Immunity
tests use 8 different antennas, EN61326-1 uses 1
Folks,
We have received an inquiry, concerning on the key differences
between the test requirements of
MIL-STD -461 and EN61326-1.
Can someone familiar with these two stds provide some details on
these different test requirements.
Your input would
Quoted from
http://www.conformity.com/shop/newsbreaks.html#need
---
Need Help In Finding Copies Of MIL STD 461?
Dont ever say that you get nothing in return for all of your tax dollars. Its
now possible to obtain copies of MIL STD 461 E (the latest release) through the
Internet
...@telweb.com
Web: www.telweb.com
-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:owner-emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf
Of Paul Slavens
Sent: 9 octobre, 2000 12:21
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: mil-std-461/462 for download
Dear Group,
Where can I download MIL-STD-461/462 from the internet
Paul,
Try this page.
http://astimage.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/
Rocky
-)-(-
-Original Message-
From: Paul Slavens [mailto:paul_slav...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 11:21 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: mil-std-461/462 for download
Dear Group,
Where can I
Dear Group,
Where can I download MIL-STD-461/462 from the internet?
Thanks in Advance
Paul
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own
STD 461
Derek,
This link worked for me.
http://astimage.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/
Rocky
-)-(-
-Original Message-
From: lfresea...@aol.com [mailto:lfresea...@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 9:35 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: MIL STD 461
Hi,
can
Derek,
This link worked for me.
http://astimage.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/
Rocky
-)-(-
-Original Message-
From: lfresea...@aol.com [mailto:lfresea...@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 9:35 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: MIL STD 461
Hi,
can anyone remind me where the MIL
Hi,
can anyone remind me where the MIL STD 461 can be download from?
Thanks,
Derek.
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
majord
Go to www.emccompliance.com. Go to the EMC Info button on the top RHS of
page. Both these PDF files are large!
--
From: kim.boll.jen...@lasat.com
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: MIL-STD-461
Date: Wed, Jan 19, 2000, 11:40 PM
Dear all,
Can someone help me ! I need the MIL-STD-461B
Dear all,
Can someone help me ! I need the MIL-STD-461B and C version (I have D version)
can I download these versions form the internet ?
Best regards,
Kim Boll Jensen
-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to
...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: copper properties MIL-STD 461 462
Hi All,
I followed the links, got registered and, with my user ID logged on so I
could muddle around to find the document. Once I had it displayed on my
desktop, I tried to save it to disk. That option was not available. So I
tried
.
Good Luck!
-Original Message-
From: Matejic, Mirko [mailto:mmate...@foxboro.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 10:03 AM
To: 'Jose Miguel Rio'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: copper properties MIL-STD 461 462
You must register on
http://astimage.daps.dla.mil/online
You must register on
http://astimage.daps.dla.mil/online/
to get the access to MIL-STDs
Mirko
-Original Message-
From: Matejic, Mirko
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 10:22
To: 'Jose Miguel Rio'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: copper properties MIL-STD 461 462
Jose:
The best source of information about MIL-STD-461 is the standard itself. All
of the requirements are defined very thoroughly (well, maybe not so thorough
for Methods CS103, CS104 CS105) within the document, and an Appendix A is
provided which gives you a discussion of the purposes
the accompanying
spiel and hands-on test experience, but if you have specific questions, I do
have the answers.
--
From: Jose Miguel Rio j...@advancedshielding.com
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: copper properties MIL-STD 461 462
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Tue, Dec 14
From: Brumbaugh, David david.brumba...@pss.boeing.com
Subject: RE: MIL-STD-461 C vs D
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 13:02:10 -0800
To: 'emc-pstc' emc-p...@ieee.org, 'ed.pr...@cubic.com'
ed.pr...@cubic.com
As I understand it, 461E will simply merge 461 and 462 into a single
interface
Hello
Here is the basics on 461D
MIL-STD-461 D
EMI
CE101 replaces CE01
CE102 up to 10MHz No Narrow or Wide band only Peak Band.
CE03 test is gone
CE07 test is gone
CS101 replaces CS01
CS02 test is gone
CS06 test is gone
CS114 Bulk Current Injection is combo replacement of CS02 whole sprectrum
Hi group,
Here's one for all of you that make products for US military/gov't
customers:
I was reviewing MIL-STD-461D (I know, a little late to be commenting at this
point) and I noticed that although CS101 in -461D corresponds to CS01 in
-461C, there is no counterpart to -461C's CS02
--- On Fri, 9 May 1997 08:34:50 +0200 Heck, Stefan stefan.h...@dnv.com
wrote:
System requirements for RE102
When performing the emission test RE102 according to MIL-STD-461/462D we
observe that the test system noise floor is at some frequencies just
below the most stringent limit (navy mobile
System requirements for RE102
When performing the emission test RE102 according to MIL-STD-461/462D we
observe that the test system noise floor is at some frequencies just
below the most stringent limit (navy mobile and army). This is when we
use the bandwidths prescribed by the standard. We can
cc: Heck, Stefan
cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
STFrom: Heck, Stefan stefan.h...@dnv.com
STSubject: MIL-STD-461/462D, RE102, noisefloor
STSystem requirements for RE102
STWhen performing the emission test RE102 according to MIL-STD-461/462D we
STobserve that the test system noise floor is at some
43 matches
Mail list logo
