On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 2:58:25 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 24 Sep 2013, at 20:58, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, September 23, 2013 1:16:08 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
shape belongs to the category of numbers imagination, and with comp this
is given
, because arithmetic implies
(logically) the existence of people (and with comp they are conscious).
Bruno
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Bruno Marchal
mar...@ulb.ac.bejavascript:
wrote:
On 25 Sep 2013, at 14:40, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 2:58:25 AM
On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 10:16:45 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 25 Sep 2013, at 14:40, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 2:58:25 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 24 Sep 2013, at 20:58, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, September 23, 2013 1:16:08 PM
On Monday, September 23, 2013 4:53:49 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 23 Sep 2013, at 20:49, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, September 23, 2013 2:21:20 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 23 Sep 2013, at 05:43, Craig Weinberg wrote:
I don't think the simulated typhoon would make
On Monday, September 23, 2013 1:16:08 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
shape belongs to the category of numbers imagination, and with comp this
is given by arithmetical relations.
Numbers imagination seem like human imagination to me.
It is not. What is important is to not impose
The main problem with comp that I see is the presentation problem.
Computation requires no sights, sounds, smells, flavors, feelings, etc, not
does it make sense that any of these could be intentionally or accidentally
generated by computation alone. Comp does not seem to refer to the universe
http://multisenserealism.com/2013/09/22/light-vision-and-optics/
[image:
MSR_Visual]http://multisenserealism.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/msr_visual.jpg
In the above diagram, the nature of light is examined from a semiotic
perspective. As with Piercian sign
On Monday, September 23, 2013 12:45:00 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
For 'life', in contrast to 'being alive', I'd add reproduction. That's the
real defining
characteristic of life.
You don't have to reproduce to be alive though, and any chain reaction can
be considered reproduction. To me,
On Monday, September 23, 2013 2:21:20 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 23 Sep 2013, at 05:43, Craig Weinberg wrote:
I don't think the simulated typhoon would make the virtual person feel wet
any more than it would make them smell seaweed. Why would it?
Because I assume comp.
lol
On Saturday, September 21, 2013 1:02:40 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 20 Sep 2013, at 21:18, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Friday, September 20, 2013 10:14:14 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 19 Sep 2013, at 17:48, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:43:23 AM
On Friday, September 20, 2013 10:14:14 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 19 Sep 2013, at 17:48, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:43:23 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 18 Sep 2013, at 22:07, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, September 18, 2013 9:14
On Friday, September 20, 2013 10:39:09 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 19 Sep 2013, at 18:47, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:55:15 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 18 Sep 2013, at 22:11, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, September 18, 2013 8:26
On Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:43:23 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 18 Sep 2013, at 22:07, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, September 18, 2013 9:14:21 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
Computers don't use symbols.
?
They use physics
On Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:55:15 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 18 Sep 2013, at 22:11, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, September 18, 2013 8:26:35 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
snip
Beyond the ambiguities, comp put the physical universe in the gap
On Wednesday, September 18, 2013 8:26:35 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 17 Sep 2013, at 19:17, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, September 17, 2013 12:40:27 PM UTC-4, freqflyer07281972 wrote:
Thanks Craig, you've articulated quite well a number of difficulties in
approaching
On Wednesday, September 18, 2013 9:14:21 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 17 Sep 2013, at 19:46, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, September 17, 2013 6:07:23 AM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Saturday
On Monday, September 16, 2013 9:22:36 PM UTC-4, Russell Standish wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:34:42AM -0700, Craig Weinberg wrote:
http://multisenserealism.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/identity3.jpg?w=595
http://multisenserealism.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/identity3
complexity. I agree though, universe, infinity...hard to know
what's clear for which audience.
Thanks again,
Craig
John M
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
The Hard Problem of consciousness asks why there is a gap between our
explanation
as
Significance...the reconciliation of diffracted sense as it is separated
from the entropy of scaled distance and time.
Thanks,
Craig
On Monday, September 16, 2013 1:35:27 PM UTC-4, Craig Weinberg wrote:
The Hard Problem of consciousness asks why there is a gap between our
explanation
On Tuesday, September 17, 2013 6:07:23 AM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Saturday, September 14, 2013 5:53:01 AM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Craig Weinberg
On Tuesday, September 17, 2013 9:50:02 PM UTC-4, Russell Standish wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 04:48:12AM -0700, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, September 16, 2013 9:22:36 PM UTC-4, Russell Standish wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:34:42AM -0700, Craig Weinberg wrote
I'm happy to translate. There doesn't seem to be any real interest in
understanding though.
On Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:01:11 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 9/17/2013 6:50 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 04:48:12AM -0700, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, September
On Sunday, September 15, 2013 3:54:24 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 14 Sep 2013, at 04:25, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Friday, September 13, 2013 9:42:54 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Sep 2013, at 18:22, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, September 12, 2013 11:56:12 AM UTC
On Tuesday, September 17, 2013 3:31:28 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 9/17/2013 10:46 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Alright. Personal or 1p experiences are probably outside the realm of
phenomena that can be investigated under Popperian science. I think
this is something that many of us can
http://multisenserealism.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/identity3.jpg?w=595
http://multisenserealism.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/identity3.jpg?w=595
Here’s a crazy little number that I like to call the Non-Well-Founded
Identity Principle. It woke my boiling brain up a few times last night, so
The Hard Problem of consciousness asks why there is a gap between our
explanation of matter, or biology, or neurology, and our experience in the
first place. What is it there which even suggests to us that there should
be a gap, and why should there be a such thing as experience to stand
On Saturday, September 14, 2013 5:53:01 AM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Friday, September 13, 2013 5:31:40 AM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Craig Weinberg
Hah. Have they announced something? I hadn't heard.
No matter what game a computer beats a person at, the person is still the
only one playing a game.
Craig
On Saturday, September 14, 2013 12:41:46 AM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
For Craig: http://xkcd.com/1263/
Brent
--
You received this
On Friday, September 13, 2013 5:31:40 AM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
Which reasoning is clearly false?
Here's what I'm thinking:
1) The conclusion I won't be surprised to be hanged Friday
On Friday, September 13, 2013 5:37:19 AM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:28 AM, meekerdb meek...@verizon.netjavascript:
wrote:
On 9/12/2013 2:33 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Time for some philosophy then :)
Here's a paradox that's making me lose sleep:
On Friday, September 13, 2013 9:31:56 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Sep 2013, at 17:47, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Which reasoning is clearly false?
Here's what I'm thinking:
1) The conclusion I won't be surprised to be hanged Friday if I am not
hanged by Thursday creates another
On Friday, September 13, 2013 9:42:54 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Sep 2013, at 18:22, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, September 12, 2013 11:56:12 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Sep 2013, at 11:33, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Time for some philosophy then :)
Here's
On Thursday, September 12, 2013 11:56:12 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Sep 2013, at 11:33, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Time for some philosophy then :)
Here's a paradox that's making me lose sleep:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unexpected_hanging_paradox
Probably many of you
Which reasoning is clearly false?
Here's what I'm thinking:
1) The conclusion I won't be surprised to be hanged Friday if I am not
hanged by Thursday creates another proposition to be surprised about. By
leaving the condition of 'surprise' open ended, it could include being
surprised that the
I don't see how reporting on something that people have known for
thousands of years is new or unexpected.
It's new because most white, educated reading audiences at that time didn't
hang out with Huichol shamans. It's like saying 'why would anyone listen to
Elvis Presley sing 'Hound Dog'
about what we have
observed of the publicly measurable aspects of life. Most of live, however,
is not public or measurable.
Good luck on your exam!
Craig
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Monday, September 9, 2013 11:39:31 PM UTC-4
As usual, I see a microcosm of science in this thread. From Bruno's
perspective, the power of reason is in its ability to see through its own
bias to find questions, problems, and shades of grey. From John Clark's
perspective, reason is about black and white evidence which provides
answers and
On Monday, September 9, 2013 11:39:31 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
(Resending complete email - trying to do this on a phone.)
On Tuesday, September 10, 2013, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On Thursday, September 5, 2013, Craig Weinberg wrote:
My position would suggest that the more
On Sunday, September 8, 2013 4:42:02 PM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
Sent from my iPad
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 chris peck chris_...@hotmail.com javascript:wrote:
* Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical
research program.*
I don't have any problem with
Free will doesn't seem to mean, in control of events.
Free will doesn't seem to mean anything, not one damn thing;
Free will means that your own will is relatively unopposed. When nothing is
overtly coercing you 'against your will', then you are free to exercise
your own will as you
I don't think that having different concepts or perspectives means that
people don't know what they are talking about. Free will is a concept which
is so fundamental that it is literally necessary to have free will before
you can ask the question of what it is. I think that it is the claim that
of insight. i just think you havent looked hard enough
I can tell from your responses that you haven't looked at my blindness at
all, only your own, dressed up to sound like me.
Craig
On Tuesday, September 3, 2013, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, September 3, 2013 8:57:13 PM UTC-4
I agree with everyone else - not bad overall, but the weak ending paves the
way for a sequel. In the next chapter, the bland, self-satisfied humanity
character begins to wonder why and how this 'imagination' came to be, and
why fear and grief are, in and of themselves, invitations for fiction
to think'...
Thanks,
Craig
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 3, 2013 11:36:29 PM UTC-4, Dennis Ochei wrote:
1) rationality (logic) in this case is to mean founded on justified
principles. This is inherently
going to take a miracle for people
to adjust to a different view. It's like a hardcore meth addict considering
for the first time that maybe there is a down-side to the drug.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Wednesday, September 4
it is.
On Wednesday, September 4, 2013, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, September 4, 2013 2:45:30 PM UTC-4, Dennis Ochei wrote:
Rules don't produce anything, just as triangles or steps don't produce
anything
What about something like Conway's Game of Life? Why is it wrong to see
the behavior
On Monday, September 2, 2013 11:50:34 PM UTC-4, Dennis Ochei wrote:
Hi Craig,
I've been following the pattern of thought you've be exhibiting this
entire thread, trying to understand why you believe in such a strange way.
I would not say that I believe. I have a set of hypotheses which I
Is MWI falsifiable?
On Tuesday, September 3, 2013 12:22:29 PM UTC-4, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Since MWI is deterministic, and MWI has not beean falsfied... your
statement is wrong.
Quentin
2013/9/3 John Clark johnk...@gmail.com javascript:
Determinism is not only falsifiable it has been
as to the nature of sense,
motive/will, and the difference between a mechanism assembled from the
outside in, and an experience which defines itself from the inside out.
Thanks,
Craig
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Monday, September 2
On Tuesday, September 3, 2013 12:41:09 AM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 9/2/2013 8:50 PM, Dennis Ochei wrote:
No matter how complex a system is, it can never be complex enough to
contain itself, and is therefore unable to perceive itself directly as a
deterministic process. Only in the
It's a sleight of hand because it assumes a single self on a single level
which does the wanting and the willing and the discerning between the two.
On Tuesday, September 3, 2013 6:54:46 AM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Dennis Ochei
:46 AM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Monday, September 2, 2013 11:50:34 PM UTC-4, Dennis Ochei wrote:
Hi Craig,
I've been following the pattern of thought you've be exhibiting this
entire thread, trying to understand why you believe in such a strange way.
I
On Tuesday, September 3, 2013 3:42:53 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 9/3/2013 12:32 PM, Dennis Ochei wrote:
Telmo and Brent,
The Humean quote sums it up nicely. You can think of a human as a
collection of desires
and a reasoning process that arbitrates between and attempts to realize
:33 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 3, 2013 3:42:53 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 9/3/2013 12:32 PM, Dennis Ochei wrote:
Telmo and Brent,
The Humean quote sums it up nicely. You can think of a human as a
collection of desires
. Spontaneous doesn't
mean what you think it means.
On 02/09/2013, at 12:35 PM, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
http://ac.els-cdn.com/S089662730700/1-s2.0-S089662730700-main.pdf?_tid=4e78eb70-1321-11e3-bc23-0aab0f01acdnat
On Monday, September 2, 2013 2:11:05 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 9/2/2013 7:34 AM, chris peck wrote:
The study you're citing firstly claims the 60% of the variance they
uncovered is explained by 'spontaneous' brain activity not 60% of all brain
activity. More importantly, by spontaneous
On Monday, September 2, 2013 2:35:43 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 9/2/2013 9:48 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Finally, there was a pronounced difference in the effect of regressing
out *spontaneous* activity on the left SMC BOLD-behavior relationship
with instructed versus *spontaneous
Is it scientific?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
anything that you are claiming.
Thanks,
Craig
All the best.
--- Original Message ---
From: Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:
Sent: 3 September 2013 2:48 AM
To: everyth...@googlegroups.com javascript:
Subject: Re: Spontaneous Brain Activity Controls Behavior
Finally
On Monday, September 2, 2013 7:54:45 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 9/2/2013 4:45 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, September 2, 2013 7:31:57 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 9/2/2013 3:56 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, September 2, 2013 6:11:51 PM UTC-4, chris peck wrote:
Hi
http://ac.els-cdn.com/S089662730700/1-s2.0-S089662730700-main.pdf?_tid=4e78eb70-1321-11e3-bc23-0aab0f01acdnat=1378052132_997e220cfcf62a6d02d5ccd22660a221
The resting brain is not silent, but exhibits organized fluctuations in
neuronal activity even in the absence of tasks or
The example of heliocentric vs geocentric views is a good one to show the
limitation of the reductionist impulse. While Earth happens to be a part of a
heliocentric topology, the fact that it is easy to mistake the Sun for the more
'moving object' is not in any way an endorsement of the
21, 2013 8:33:06 AM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 21 August 2013 03:59, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
It is possible to make the distinction between doing something by
accident
and intentionally, between enslavement and freedom, while still
acknowledging that brain mechanisms
:
To: everyth...@googlegroups.com javascript:
Subject: Re: Determinism - Tricks of the Trade
On Wednesday, August 21, 2013 8:33:06 AM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 21 August 2013 03:59, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
It is possible to make the distinction between doing something
On Wednesday, August 21, 2013 8:33:06 AM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 21 August 2013 03:59, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
It is possible to make the distinction between doing something by
accident
and intentionally, between enslavement and freedom, while still
On Monday, August 19, 2013 11:02:00 AM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 17 August 2013 04:01, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com
javascript:wrote:
The objection that the terms ‘consciousness’ or ‘free will’ are used in
too many different ways to be understandable is one of the most common
/alphanumeric detection doesn't have the harmonic oscillation and
melodic structure to contain music theory.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just-so_story
Try again?
Craig
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 2:47 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 8/17/2013 10:09 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Don't be so
Coincidental post I wrote yesterday:
It may not be possible to imitate a human mind computationally, because
awareness may be driven by aesthetic qualities rather than mathematical
logic alone. The problem, which I call the Presentation Problem, is what
several outstanding issues in science
The connection between self-organization and decreasing entropy – which
I’ve considered dozens of times before, today gave me an interesting
insight which connects self-organization and sense, which I hope could
contribute to a mathematical appreciation of sense.
It goes like this:* If you
On Saturday, August 17, 2013 9:59:26 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 8/17/2013 2:01 PM, John Mikes wrote:
Consciousness is different: it is a hoax some high hatted
scientists/pholosophers invented to make themselves smart. No basis, every
author uses the term for a content that fits her/his
On Saturday, August 17, 2013 11:14:22 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 8/17/2013 7:05 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, August 17, 2013 9:59:26 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 8/17/2013 2:01 PM, John Mikes wrote:
Consciousness is different: it is a hoax some high hatted
scientists
On Sunday, August 18, 2013 12:24:18 AM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 8/17/2013 8:59 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, August 17, 2013 11:14:22 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 8/17/2013 7:05 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, August 17, 2013 9:59:26 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 8
What new perspectives would you say are revealed in the paper? Can you sum
them up?
Craig
On Friday, August 16, 2013 1:50:04 AM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
Here's a fascinating essay by Scott Aronson that is a really scientific,
operational exposition on the question of 'free will'; one which
The objection that the terms ‘consciousness’ or ‘free will’ are used in too
many different ways to be understandable is one of the most common
arguments that I run into. I agree that it is a superficially valid
objection, but on deeper consideration, it should be clear that it is a
specious
On Friday, August 16, 2013 2:45:56 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 8/16/2013 11:01 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Nobody on Earth can fail to understand the difference between doing
something by accident and intentionally,
Really?� Intentionally usually means with conscious forethought.ï
On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 3:17:48 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 8/13/2013 12:00 PM, Chris de Morsella wrote:
John Epigenetic changes do not change the sequence of bases in DNA, and
more important I see no evidence that the body has learned any lessons. I
see no evidence that epigenetic
On Friday, August 9, 2013 10:37:29 AM UTC-4, John Clark wrote:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.au javascript:
wrote:
variants like Larmarkianism may well be possible.
There are a number of problems with Lamarckism, such as it never having
been observed to
Verily I say unto thee that a crucifix of bacon shall inflict double-monad
damage with no saving throw onto all Marxists who gaze upon it or breathe
its aroma. - Dwayne Leibniz Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho
On Monday, August 5, 2013 11:49:41 AM UTC-4, freqflyer07281972 wrote:
A wise man once
Thanks Freqflyer,
It's interesting for me because in some respects, Roger seems like a shadow
version of myself in that we are both driven by a similar cranksessive
motivation to focus on the particulars of the Hard Problem. Having had no
exposure to speak of in philosophy generally or Leibniz
On Thursday, August 1, 2013 9:35:18 AM UTC-4, Alberto G.Corona wrote:
Thanks Roger for denouncing the fear induced by liberals and their
negative religions, but this is not the appropriate place.
It doesn't appear that Roger cares about whether this is an appropriate
place - which
No, it wuz the Libruls and their evil propaganda against delicious DDT.
On Friday, August 2, 2013 1:35:31 AM UTC-4, freqflyer07281972 wrote:
Because of Roger Clough, a less than mediocre Lutheran apologist who
considers himself an astute interpreter of Leibniz, a formerly bright
corner of
*Relativity and Reality
*
To what does relativity relate? Before there can be relation there must be
presence, and before a presence can relate to another presence, there must
be a capacity for detection of some kind. Even collision of bodies should
not be taken for granted in physics. It is
safety
and lack of planning is a better option? What form of social organization
would you prefer, and how does it differ from Feudalism?
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:
To: everything-list everyth...@googlegroups.com javascript:
Sent
On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 3:07:53 PM UTC-4, Alberto G.Corona wrote:
Don´t make me laugh.
I don´t say that racism isn't a bad thing. It is. I say that the
industry of antiracism enforcement is an evil thing. Like is evil to
enforce public plumbing.
I'm sure that you don't mean to
their values on you, then how can you claim to impose your
anti-antiracist values on them?
2013/7/24 Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:
On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 3:07:53 PM UTC-4, Alberto G.Corona wrote:
Don´t make me laugh.
I don´t say that racism isn't a bad thing. It is. I
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 8:03:54 AM UTC-4, Alberto G.Corona wrote:
I can not resist to say something.
THat something is innate or natural means that whatever to do with it
must take into accout that this is innate or natural, no matter if this is
morally positive or negative.
On Sunday, July 21, 2013 8:25:35 AM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 20 July 2013 10:57, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
On Friday, July 19, 2013 8:21:42 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 20 July 2013 06:59, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
If a dog
http://24.media.tumblr.com/782ebd9e4402a824306e64ec89d95b43/tumblr_mqavewIDtQ1qeenqko1_500.jpg
More:
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 11:29:07 AM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Friday, July 12, 2013 10:49:20 PM UTC-4, Jason wrote:
I think functionalism (or more specifically
On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 12:06:38 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 Jul 2013, at 17:29, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Friday, July 12, 2013 10:49:20 PM UTC-4, Jason wrote
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 8:20:42 PM UTC-4, Pierz wrote:
John has a button on his forehead with the words free will written on
it. It's a bit like Woody's string in Toy Story that causes him to say
reach for the sky when you pull it. If you push John's free will button
he says something
http://multisenserealism.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/msr_legend.jpg
http://multisenserealism.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/msr_legend.jpg
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 8:00:44 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 18 July 2013 23:20, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
I did use the term rational perhaps inappropriately. I meant that
some aesthetic choices have evolutionary utility and others not.
Nevertheless
On Friday, July 19, 2013 8:21:42 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 20 July 2013 06:59, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
If a dog started talking in full English sentences without
manipulation by an outside force the explanation must be in the
physics of its body. I
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 5:55:36 PM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:41:28 PM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:32 AM, meekerdb
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 6:04:46 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/16/2013 2:08 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:44:20 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/16/2013 1:38 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:18:09 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/16/2013
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 12:34:19 AM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/17/2013 8:48 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 17 July 2013 05:37, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:32:28 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 2:27:14 AM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/17/2013 10:13 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 18 July 2013 14:34, meekerdb mee...@verizon.net javascript: wrote:
On 7/17/2013 8:48 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 17 July 2013 05:37, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 1:13:59 AM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 18 July 2013 14:34, meekerdb meek...@verizon.net javascript:
wrote:
On 7/17/2013 8:48 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 17 July 2013 05:37, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
On Monday, July 15
On Monday, July 15, 2013 6:32:28 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 7/15/2013 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Would this kind of universality of human sense-making be likely if the
connections between words, shapes, and feelings were purely computational?
Why not? Being a broken line vs
601 - 700 of 3100 matches
Mail list logo
