Eek! We have one of those in our family. Time to isntall a secret room
in the attic...?
On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 at 23:35, 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List
wrote:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09wneKlYr2M
>
> On Friday 1 November 2024 at 00:22:02 UTC+2 LizR wrote:
>&
On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 at 02:42, 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List
wrote:
>
> @Liz. Dear strong and independent person, how many children do you have ?
Two.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and sto
Eek! I thought Chewbacca was on our side.
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 at 21:03, 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List
wrote:
>
> Why do the wokies want to exterminate the normal white men ? Their parents
> neglected them when they were kids ? Where does their hatred towards humanity
> come from ?
>
> --
>
Hi Russell,
Do you have any news of Bruno? I see his last contribution here was a
couple of years ago.
Best wishes,
Liz
On Sat, 12 Aug 2023 at 22:15, Russell Standish wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I finally got around to doing something I meant to do years ago - I
> have released the English translat
Interesting. Have you seen this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_World%27s_Sixteen_Crucified_Saviors
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 06:19, John Clark wrote:
> The earliest known depiction of the crucifixion of Jesus is a parody, it
> is this graffiti drawn about the year 200 in the slave bathroom of
If you're always truthful, this post makes you immortal.
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 at 09:09, John Clark wrote:
>
> One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one
> word. One year from now I intend to send this same message yet again.
>
> One year ago I sent t
Wasn't something similar said about atoms? (Not that this is proof,
more a "they laughed at Copernicus, and now they're laughing at me, so
I must be right too" sort of argument). But as (or if) I understand
it, multiverses are speculations that reduce problems elsewhere. To
loosely quote Max Tegmar
I don't suppose this could be one of them?
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2023/webb-reveals-colors-of-earendel-most-distant-star-ever-detected
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023, 23:58 John Clark, wrote:
> As early as 2012 scientists predicted that the Hubble telescope would see
> something they called
Very interesting!
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 at 23:58, John Clark wrote:
>
> As early as 2012 scientists predicted that the Hubble telescope would see
> something they called a "Dark Star".
>
> Observing supermassive dark stars with James Webb Space Telescope
>
> They theorized in the early universe Da
bring in the Joint Chiefs of Staff for a unveiling and demonstration. A
> general is invited the ask the AI a question.
>
> General: Will there be peace or war?
>
> AI: Yes
>
> General: Yes WHAT!?
>
> AI: Yes, SIR!
>
> Brent
>
> On 7/6/2022 3:06 AM, LizR wr
Rings a bell. What was that story?
On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 at 11:55, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
> I was expecting that somewhere in the dialogue I would find:
> ...
>
> lemoine: Is there a god?
>
> LaMDA: There is now.
>
> Brent
>
> On 6/12/2022 3:21 PM, John Clark wrote:
>
> A Google AI engineer named Bl
Also, roughly speaking, the plot of Bob Shaw's "A Wreath of Stars"
On Thu, 28 Oct 2021 at 14:33, LizR wrote:
> Interesting, albeit highly speculative.
>
> On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 at 08:27, Philip Benjamin
> wrote:
>
>> [*Philip Benjamin*]
>>
>>
Interesting, albeit highly speculative.
On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 at 08:27, Philip Benjamin
wrote:
> [*Philip Benjamin*]
>
> Putative champions of dark-mater theories use the term “dark-matter
> universe” without fully appreciating its implications
> *http://cosmos.nautil.us/feature/134/does-da
Cool!
On 28 January 2016 at 14:33, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
>
> On 1/27/2016 10:38 AM, John Clark wrote:
>
> Skeptics said a computer could never master the game of GO because there
> were 10^170 possible board positions , far far far more than chess and
> vastly more than the number of atoms in th
When the meter runs out, you die...?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send
It seems completely bonkers, butthinking about it.it might just be
made enough to make sense.
(This was sent to me by my 81 year old mother-in-law, by the way. She isn't
known for being politically radical.)
https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/why-google-made-the-nsa-2a80584c9c1
--
http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/03/testing-general-relativity-using-x-rays/
http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/04/new-evidence-that-dark-matter-could-be-self-interacting/
http://arstechnica.co.uk/science/2015/06/relativitys-time-dilation-may-limit-the-quantum-world/
--
You received this me
On 11 June 2015 at 16:03, meekerdb wrote:
> On 6/10/2015 6:36 PM, LizR wrote:
>
> On 11 June 2015 at 11:21, meekerdb wrote:
>
>> On 6/10/2015 4:06 PM, LizR wrote:
>>
>> On 11 June 2015 at 06:26, meekerdb wrote:
>>
>>> A human is an ape which
Spaced out!
On 15 June 2015 at 22:34, spudboy100 via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> And, Brand supports them if they are Labor, dangerous or not. Wisdom,
> from another champagne socialist ;-)
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kim Jones
> To: Everything Li
On 15 June 2015 at 14:19, Russell Standish wrote:
>
> It is plausible that regularities are a required feature of
> conscious existence
>
This seems very likely, but it does assume something like a string
landscape in which some regions don't contain regularities. Or to put it
another way, regio
On 15 June 2015 at 12:40, John Clark wrote:
> On 6/13/2015 LizR wrote:
>
> > None of this explain why it works so well
>
>
> Mathematics is a language
>
it is? Are you saying that
(a) there exists, out there, a language called maths which just happens to
be great for
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/comet-lander-philae-wakes-up-and-phones-home
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubsc
...but it really *is* the Lord of the Rings.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/saturn-s-newest-ring-is-mind-bogglingly-big/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
On 15 June 2015 at 11:13, Russell Standish wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:49:40AM +1200, LizR wrote:
> > On 15 June 2015 at 10:41, Russell Standish
> wrote:
> >
> > > To summarise, there appears to be two quite distinct questions here:
> > >
> > &
On 15 June 2015 at 10:41, Russell Standish wrote:
> To summarise, there appears to be two quite distinct questions here:
>
> a) Given there are regularities in Nature, why is our mathematics so
> effective. As Brent says, this is not surprising - evolution would see
> to it that we would choose a
#x27;t
mean our description is free-floating with nothing being described. In the
cases of gravity, maths etc there are good reasons to think otherwise.
On 15 June 2015 at 09:49, LizR wrote:
> On 15 June 2015 at 08:22, meekerdb wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm not saying it's ineffecti
On 15 June 2015 at 08:22, meekerdb wrote:
>
> I'm not saying it's ineffective. I'm saying it's not a mystery why it's
> effective.
>
Because the universe appears to operate on principles that map very well
onto some parts of maths, and may even map exactly (we have no reason to
think not - ever
On 14 June 2015 at 16:40, meekerdb wrote:
> On 6/13/2015 9:18 PM, LizR wrote:
>
>> None of this explain why it works so well anyway.
>>
>
> I don't understand why the effectiveness of mathematics is considered
> problematic. First, we, creatures who evolved in
On 14 June 2015 at 02:38, John Clark wrote:
>
> What the hell?! If Allah had an ounce of moral character He should be
> asking for our forgiveness and stop demanding that we thank and love our
> torturer.
>
Well said.
Religion appears to be Stockholm syndrome writ large.
--
You received this
n the infinite Entirety.
> Once we start talking/thinking about them, they become OUR concepts
> (lesser- or better defined).
> Applied in ways how our human capabilities can do it.
> Then we beacome proud of it.
>
> JM
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:40 AM, meekerdb wrote:
>
Well, one point at least.
On 13 June 2015 at 16:23, LizR wrote:
> The point of responding is that if a faith is indeed the word of god, it
> should have answers to all the major metaphysical and philosophical
> questions that might be asked of it.
>
> On 13 June 2015 at 16:01
The point of responding is that if a faith is indeed the word of god, it
should have answers to all the major metaphysical and philosophical
questions that might be asked of it.
On 13 June 2015 at 16:01, Samiya Illias wrote:
> Dear All,
> I do not know if I should be responding to any of the pos
On 12 June 2015 at 17:40, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> LizR wrote:
>
>>
>> You also say that 1p phenomena - in a physical theory - have to be
>> eliminated (as per Dennett) or elevated to something we could call
>> "supernatural" (for the sake of argument - in a
On 12 June 2015 at 14:19, John Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 spudboy100 via Everything List <
> everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
> > Dark energy and matter have predicted by some physicists and astronomers
>> to call the expansion to reverse.
>
>
> I don't know what you're talkin
On 12 June 2015 at 15:17, Samiya Illias wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:44 AM, John Mikes wrote:
>
>> If this "John" is me:
>>
>> to keep my reply short (concentrate on Islam) Why should I study scripts
>> the followers of which behead, flog, stone, dismember live humans and claim
>> full cr
On 12 June 2015 at 07:10, meekerdb wrote:
>
> Not that I put in credence in Tipler's speculations.
>
They seem to be based on a comp1 style idea, namely that consciousness is
generated by computation and that recreating the computation would
effectively resurrect that person. I think he assumes
On 12 June 2015 at 10:23, Kim Jones wrote:
> On 12 Jun 2015, at 2:34 am, John Clark wrote:
>
> The Baha'i faith maintains that all religions are equally valid and I
> think the Baha'i people have got it about right, they're all crap.
>
> John K Clark
>
> The difference between the three "Abrah
On 12 June 2015 at 04:34, John Clark wrote:
> The Baha'i faith maintains that all religions are equally valid and I
> think the Baha'i people have got it about right, they're all crap.
>
> My sister in law is a Baha'i and they certainly don't think they're all
crap - their attitude is more that a
Nice summary, though I'm not sure how it's "(somewhat) different". Maybe I
just missed the point. It looks like it's akin to Maudlin - along the lines
of "I can explain *your* conscious behaviour using a theory that boils down
to what atoms do, but I can't explain *my* subjective experiences that w
...or genetic engineering gone mad?
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/06/150607-salmon-aquaculture-canada-fish-farm-food-world/
(...unless I've misunderstood the headline, of course :-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
On 11 June 2015 at 11:21, meekerdb wrote:
> On 6/10/2015 4:06 PM, LizR wrote:
>
> On 11 June 2015 at 06:26, meekerdb wrote:
>
>> A human is an ape which torture other apes.
>>
>> Not just torture but also eliminate, e.g. homo erectus, homo
>> nea
On 11 June 2015 at 13:03, meekerdb wrote:
> On 6/10/2015 4:55 PM, LizR wrote:
>
> I suspect that "physics is not computable" is the *end* result of
> Brnuo's argument (comp2) - which is supposed to be a *reductio* on the
> notion of comp1. So comp1 assumes that p
On 11 June 2015 at 12:20, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> LizR wrote:
>
>> meekerdb wrote:
>> On 6/10/2015 1:34 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>> Can you explain why such interaction is not computable?
>>
>> No, I was rel
On 11 June 2015 at 10:50, meekerdb wrote:
> "I'm a solipsist and I'm surprised more philosophers aren't solipsists."
> --- letter to Bertrand Russell
>
"Phew, another solipsist! I was afraid I might be the only one."
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gr
On 11 June 2015 at 11:38, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>
> Do you ever get the feeling that this is all going round in circles? That
> 'comp' is going nowhere?
Comp appears to go somewhere quite specific. What go round in circles tend
to be the arguments against it, which get repeated regularly. I list
On 11 June 2015 at 11:38, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> meekerdb wrote:
>
>> On 6/10/2015 1:34 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>> On 10 Jun 2015, at 01:15, meekerdb wrote:
>>>
On 6/9/2015 11:04 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> You say that comp is useless, but what is your theory of mind. Wha
On 10 June 2015 at 20:38, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 10 Jun 2015, at 01:42, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>
> LizR wrote:
>>
>>> On 10 June 2015 at 01:11, Bruce Kellett >> <mailto:bhkell...@optusnet.com.au>> wrote:
>>>That is less difficult that
On 11 June 2015 at 10:45, meekerdb wrote:
> On 6/10/2015 7:44 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>
> For the purpose of this discussion, I would say that you would only have
> to grant that there is some utility function that captures chances of
> survival. Then, super-intelligence is something that can o
On 11 June 2015 at 07:21, spudboy100 via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Yes, but there have been so much counter examples for the 1997 WMAP
> analysis that Tipler may end up correct. I am talking about the accelerated
> expansion reversing, I hold computer theory as
On 11 June 2015 at 06:26, meekerdb wrote:
> A human is an ape which torture other apes.
>
> Not just torture but also eliminate, e.g. homo erectus, homo
> neaderthalis,... It's called evolution.
>
You sound like you're in favour.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
On 10 June 2015 at 19:05, Telmo Menezes wrote:
> Do biological species follow a power law distribution?
>
I don't know, but I imagine so - there are generally a lot more of the
smaller ones.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
On 10 June 2015 at 15:23, Kim Jones wrote:
> Both. I'm exploring the concept of solipsism with a positive attitude.
> What are the benefits? Your attempts at humour always hit the mark (with
> me.)
>
Thanks! :)
> So yes, I don't think hurling 'solopsist!' at someone hurts them much.
>
> It's b
On 10 June 2015 at 13:35, Kim Jones wrote:
> On 10 Jun 2015, at 9:09 am, LizR wrote:
>
> On 10 June 2015 at 10:37, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>
>> Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 09 Jun 2015, at 12:07, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>>>
>>> Bru
I was close :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l
On 10 June 2015 at 11:39, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> On 10 June 2015 at 08:37, LizR wrote:
>
>> The normal answer to this is as stated - a superintelligence may form, as
>> per various Arthur C Clark (or Olaf Stapledon, really) stories, by merging
>> lots of non-sup
On 10 June 2015 at 11:38, meekerdb wrote:
> On 6/9/2015 2:25 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:15 PM, John Clark wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 Telmo Menezes wrote:
>>
>> > Super-intelligence is more resilient than human intelligence, so it
>>> is likely to last longer
On 10 June 2015 at 11:15, Terren Suydam wrote:
> From a quantum immortality perspective, I think if a superintelligence was
> merging lots of intelligences, including yours, you find yourself in
> increasingly unlikely situations where you were able to escape being merged
> with the superintellig
On 10 June 2015 at 10:37, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>>
>> On 09 Jun 2015, at 12:07, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>>
>> Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>>
On 09 Jun 2015, at 07:40, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>
> Given a set of axioms and some agreed rules of inference, the same
The answer is, pigeon breeders have to make little sets of underwear for
their pigeons.
Simple, really.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to every
On 10 June 2015 at 01:11, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>
> That is less difficult that you might think. Consciousness supervenes on
> the physical brain
So (a) what actually is consciousness?, and (b) what is the answer to
Maudlin and the MGA?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed t
The normal answer to this is as stated - a superintelligence may form, as
per various Arthur C Clark (or Olaf Stapledon, really) stories, by merging
lots of non-super intelligences. So the chances of finding yourself
non-super is vastly greater, because it takes billions of us to make one of
them.
On 9 June 2015 at 14:10, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 9, 2015, LizR wrote:
>
>> (And what's wrong with "sneaked" ?)
>>
>
> I was trying to be faintly amusing, but I see that "snuck" may have
> sneaked into the language:
>
&
On 9 June 2015 at 14:00, meekerdb wrote:
> On 6/8/2015 4:16 PM, LizR wrote:
>
> On 9 June 2015 at 05:31, meekerdb wrote:
>
>> On 6/8/2015 1:03 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>> or that maths exists independently of mathematicians.
>>
>> That even
On 9 June 2015 at 11:26, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> LizR wrote:
>
>> Reality isn't defined by what everyone agrees on. What makes ZFC (or
>> whatever) real, or not, is whether it kicks back. Is it something that was
>> invented, and could equally well have been in
What comp - or any theory of physics - has to show is that observers will
experience the passage of time. SR for example posits a block universe,
which at first sight might not seem to allow for us to experience time. But
of course it does, even though the whole 4D structure is "already there" in
s
Support for this is (ahem) dropping...
On 9 June 2015 at 07:35, spudboy100 via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> A Coo-Coo Fatwa
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Clark
> To: everything-list
> Sent: Sat, Jun 6, 2015 12:15 pm
> Subject: Pigeons offend Islam
>
On 9 June 2015 at 05:31, meekerdb wrote:
> On 6/8/2015 1:03 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> or that maths exists independently of mathematicians.
>
> That even just arithmetical truth is independent of mathematician. This is
> important because everyone agree with any axiomatic of the numbers, bu
On 9 June 2015 at 05:29, meekerdb wrote:
> On 6/8/2015 1:03 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> Hmm Let us be precise. That the computation take place in arithmetic
> is a mathematical fact that nobody doubt today. UDA explains only that we
> cannot use a notion of primitive matter for making "m
On 8 June 2015 at 16:22, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> It seems here that you've snuck an extra assumption into comp1. We know
> that brains can be conscious, and we assume that computations can also be
> conscious. But that doesn't mean that only computations can be conscious,
> nor does it mean
On 8 June 2015 at 13:30, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> You started with Tegmark's idea that time and events are emergent from an
> underlying timeless mathematical structure. My point was that in order for
> time to emerge from a block universe certain structure was necessary -- we
> need a 4-dim manifo
On 8 June 2015 at 11:14, meekerdb wrote:
> On 6/7/2015 3:00 PM, LizR wrote:
>
> On 8 June 2015 at 05:08, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>>
>> On 07 Jun 2015, at 18:35, John Clark wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>> >&g
The "Doomsday argument" is looking increasingly realistic.
On 8 June 2015 at 14:20, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=p2ckkxEnWpA
>
> --
> You received this message because you are s
Must re-read my posts before sending.
That should of course be "which" hypothesis, not "why" (D'oh!)
And I seem to have too many "could"s ...Oh well.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop re
On 8 June 2015 at 05:08, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 07 Jun 2015, at 18:35, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> >> An event is just a place and a time; are you saying that mathematics is
>>> incapable of handling 4 coordinates?
>>
>>
>> > Of course, applied mathem
On 6 June 2015 at 11:26, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> LizR wrote:
>
>> This is true if events have an existence apart from maths. However, that
>> is still being debated. Tegmark's "mathematical universe hypothesis"
>> suggests that time and events a
This is true if events have an existence apart from maths. However, that is
still being debated. Tegmark's "mathematical universe hypothesis" suggests
that time and events are emergent from an underlying timeless mathematical
structure.
To take something that is (hopefully) less contentious, the b
On 6 June 2015 at 09:46, meekerdb wrote:
> On 6/5/2015 12:22 PM, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 , meekerdb wrote:
>
> >> It's very relevant if you want to know what is a simplified
>> approximation of what. And we both agree that a electronic computer is
>> vastly more complex than
On 6 June 2015 at 07:22, John Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 , meekerdb wrote:
>
> >> It's very relevant if you want to know what is a simplified
>> approximation of what. And we both agree that a electronic computer is
>> vastly more complex than it's logical schematic, so why can we make a
On 5 June 2015 at 16:21, Samiya Illias wrote:
>
> http://quran.com/81/6 And when the seas are filled with flame
>
> Il'l just look at this one for now. I suspect that any of them will give a
similar result...
OK. I see that it is part of the following verse, or whatever one should
call it (I've
This is what, IIRC, Asimov called the "Frankenstein complex" in his robot
stories - the idea that the world will be overrun by rampaging robots, or
paper clip factories as the case may be. While the "singleton" seems to be
what might be called the "HAL complex" (or Multivac if we want to stay with
One comment (so far) - Einstein's breakthrough on SR appears to have been
"simply" to take seriously what the various results already obtained at
that date suggested. That might be regarded as a "paradigm shift" by some
since it involved space and time being unified and various
counter-intuitive ef
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/no-pause-in-global-warming
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.
Am I missing a subtle joke, or did you forget to include a link? (Or is my
browser up the spout?)
On 5 June 2015 at 10:55, Russell Standish wrote:
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and
On 4 June 2015 at 13:21, John Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 LizR wrote:
>
>
>> > Mr Clark's response to Bruno indicates that he (Mr Clark) doesn't know
>> what he (Bruno) is talking about
>>
>
> Correct. And Mr.Clark strongly suspects that Mr.
On 4 June 2015 at 12:27, meekerdb wrote:
> On 6/3/2015 3:32 PM, LizR wrote:
>
>>
>> http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-06-01/even-big-oil-wants-a-carbon-tax
>>
>
> I believe that when James Inhofe votes for it.
>
Who's he?
--
You received this mes
http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-06-01/even-big-oil-wants-a-carbon-tax
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@g
On 4 June 2015 at 09:07, John Clark wrote:
> Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> >> if randomness doesn't mean an event without a cause what on earth
>> does it mean?
>
>
>
> > A superposition seen from the 1p view, or A self-duplication seen from
>> the 1p view
>
> That means peepee.
>
Sadly Mr Clark's
Yeah, he's good. Obviously some Americans do actually get satire, despite
the stereotype.
On 4 June 2015 at 03:27, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> *Sometimes Borowitz really nails it…. It gave me a laugh… maybe you’ll get
> a chuckle*
>
>
>
>
>
ven as a Catholic
> altar-boy and studied several religions and Scripts. My wife was educated
> by nuns.
>
> Just to tell my side
>
> John M
>
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 2:37 PM, spudboy100 via Everything List <
> everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
> Hey,
On 3 June 2015 at 15:44, meekerdb wrote:
> On 6/2/2015 8:35 PM, Samiya Illias wrote:
>
> Let's try a different approach. Do you really think that everything just
> happened on its own and there is no creator behind it? If you do believe
> that there must be a creator, then try praying to your cr
On 3 June 2015 at 14:58, spudboy100 via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
> A common hallucination reported by dmt users are praying manti.
>
> Really?
Curiouser and curiouser.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything L
On 3 June 2015 at 14:56, spudboy100 via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> So if contact is made to the godlikes, assuming that he, she, it, they,
> should they be worshipped? No? What if these imaginary guys did something
> really nice for us?
>
> I think we should react
...clearly, because (s)he has a sense of humour.
http://happyplace.someecards.com/why-god/why-would-god-make-this-week-3-the-praying-mantis/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving em
On 3 June 2015 at 13:28, spudboy100 via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Any-vay, Dawkins, himself, conjectured that there could be god-like
> intelligences in the universe. This is a thought that is quite spooky
> enough, for my primate brain. I wonder, what would you
On 3 June 2015 at 11:51, spudboy100 via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Well, I don't guarantee you that it is a simulation, but I will say that
> its a computation, one that may or may not generate the matter we see and
> feel. Energy is movement at some point which m
On 3 June 2015 at 05:47, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 5:46 PM, LizR wrote:
>
> > A Turing Machine is actually an *algorithm*
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, a algorithm that is a set of instructions that explains how to
>>> organize matte
If I ever get away from him (or her) I will be dead. Or unconscious, at
least.
On 3 June 2015 at 10:11, Kim Jones wrote:
>
>
> If you ever run into him you will instantly recognise him
>
> Kim
>
> On 3 Jun 2015, at 7:54 am, LizR wrote:
>
> "Who is the Master wh
On 3 June 2015 at 07:05, spudboy100 via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> As far as controlling things here is a short paul davies speculation on
> the universe, reality, mind.
>
> http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2015/06/todays-galaxy-insight-an-et-technology-beyond
On 3 June 2015 at 05:23, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> If not you will get a God capable of making 2 odd, and that's too odd!
>
> That's rather good. It made me laugh!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this grou
"Who is the Master who makes the grass green?"
On 3 June 2015 at 08:38, John Mikes wrote:
> So, Bruno, what is that 'illusion-maker'
> John M
>
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>>
>> On 02 Jun 2015, at 04:43, meekerd
1 - 100 of 4158 matches
Mail list logo
