So you are all honestly telling me that you have never had this problem
yourselves? Either you can't have installed the security rollup package
from January or you have some mystical way of working round it. Please
enlighten me.
Thanks.
Pete.
OK
The event messages are as follows:
Event Type: Error
Event Source: Service Control Manager
Event Category: None
Event ID: 7001
Date: 09/08/2002
Time: 10:44:46
User: N/A
Computer: MYSERVER
Description:
The Microsoft Exchange Information Store ser
OK
The event messages are as follows:
Event Type: Error
Event Source: Service Control Manager
Event Category: None
Event ID: 7001
Date: 09/08/2002
Time: 10:44:46
User: N/A
Computer: MYSERVER
Description:
The Microsoft Exchange Information Store ser
I think there is a setting in the web interface to include the thread.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Peter Hall
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Admin.exe can no longer connect to Ex
Open your admin tool, chose the Chief Exec mailbox properties, delivery options.
In Alternate recipient type the deputy CE's name and tick the box that says
deliver to both.
Course, she'll then say that she doesn't want it to happen all the time!
Jon
> -Original Message-
> From: Eve J
Pete,
Never had the problem here.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Peter Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 August 2002 09:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Admin.exe can no longer connect to Exch 5.5
Anything I can do?
CRAFTY SPAMMING - still going on this morning
Yesterday, all afternoon someone has been sending out Mortgage Loan SPAM
to thousands of users on MSN and AOL.
To make matters worse, they are forging in the mail header, OUR Mail
Server address as the
Sender and the Reply addres
Short term --
I would use "Message Filtering" on your Exchange bridgehead and put iun
filters for @aol.com and @msn.com to kill them all. I understand this will
likely get rid of some legitimate emails, but I know of no other way to kill
mass quantities of SPAM.
Long term -
I would also thin
To quote Microsoft, "This is by design". They will need to dial in or use OWA.
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Reetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 7:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: server access
newbie question...
we have a user that wants to ins
Does anyone know a way to stop loops in Exchange 5.5? We have big problems
with users setting auto-forward to an external mailbox and now and then we
get loops and our Exchangeservers running the IMC break down. Any tricks
out there, any third-party products?
/Olle
__
Disable forwarding in the IMS will cure the problem!
-Original Message-
From: Olle Gustafson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 8:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Loops in Exchange 5.5
Does anyone know a way to stop loops in Exchange 5.5? We have big probl
Found this on importing/exporting info from GAL's for creating SMTP custom
recepients on other servers in different organisations. Most of you may have
seen it, but I thought I would share it for future reference!
How to Extract SMTP Addresses for Mailbox Recipients to Create Custom
Recipients in
Actually the trick is to disable that. Doing what you do will always cause
mail loops.
Talk to management. Let them know that by doing what you are doing, that it
is putting the companies ability for reliable email at risk for the
convenience of a few people.
-Original Message-
From: Olle
I am trying to set a MAPI property "PR_EMS_AB_EXTENSION_ATTRIBUTE_1" throug
OLEDB.
Here is the sample code that I have
---
Dim Conn as New ADODB.Connection
Dim Rec as New ADODB.Record
Dim Flds as ADODB.Fields
Conn.Provider = "ExOLEDB.DataSource"
Conn.
Every time I open the System Manager the public folders are dismounted.
I mount the store but I have no options once the store is mounted. I
can't view the Public Folders from the Sys Manager but they are
available in Outlook and OWA. Any idea's?
Thanks,
Alex
___
Disable Automatic Replies to the Internet in the IMS and use Custom
Recipients instead.
-Original Message-
From: Olle Gustafson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 8:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Loops in Exchange 5.5
Does anyone know a way to stop lo
Good Morning,
Subscribed forever, but never post...
I am migrating from e5.5 to e2k. Migrating to a completely different
domain tree on the 2k side. All brand spanking new. Servers on
NT4.0/Ex5.5 side are all nt 4.0 running sp6. The Exchange 5.5 server is at
Exchange SP4. Win2k side - All W2
I know that you can have a "catch all" e-mail address in exchange. I dont
know how to do it Can someone help please?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.
Hi,
Would really appreciate any advice on the following migration plan:
We currently have an Exchange 5.5 (SP4) server which is a BDC on a NT4.0
domain - lets call it NT4DOMAIN. We have already created a Windows 2000
domain (W2KDOMAIN) and have migrated about half of the user accounts from
th
I will be creating a brand new domain in our organization and installing
Exchange 2000 on a fresh server within that domain. We have an old
Exchange 5.5 server that is also an NT4.0 BDC. I want to export the user
mailbox data from that server to the new Exchange 2000 server. What is
the easiest
Folks,
I apologize if this is an annoying question, I've been reading some faq's on
the subject and just wanted some tips from someone who has been through
this.
Situation: I have an Exchange 5.5 Server Running on WINNT at service pack
4. Currently the exchange server is a BDC and handles some
Hello, all -
Environment: single Exchange 2000 server, SP2, recently switched to native mode after
moving to new hardware and moving mailboxes and public folders from E5.5, SP4.
I keep getting the following errors in the Application log: They started when I took
down the Exchange 5.5 server (b
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q324021&SD=MSKB&;
for E2k...
-Original Message-
From: Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E-mail aliasing
I know that you can have a "catch all" e-mail addr
Hi all,
I'm migrating to Exch 2K.
Since I joined the new 2k to the old 5.5, all Outlook XP users
(including myself) have been getting the following error:
"Task 'Microsoft Exchange Server' reported error (0X8004010F) : 'The
operation failed. An object could not be found."
I came across a very
Without being funny, read the material available on Microsoft's site
about Exchange 5.5 and Exchange 2000 and test, test, test.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 August 2002 08:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Migrating from 5.5 to 2000
I wi
I would have your users delete or rename all of their *.oab files on their
hard disk and download the Address book again.
I have been having quite a few offline file problems with XP. Maybe Office
XP SP1 will resolve some of these issues. I dunno yet.
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Co
Or perhaps XP Sp2 which is out now :)
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Error 0X8004010F
I would have your users delete or rename all of their *.oab files on their
hard disk
I can't keep up.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 6:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Error 0X8004010F
Or perhaps XP Sp2 which is out now :)
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
Its just a fluke.
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Error 0X8004010F
I can't keep up.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday
I have SP2 installed (other users are a combination of SP1 and no SPs).
I tried removing any OAB files I found, but I still get the error..
Any more ideas?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 August 2002 3:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Sounds like you may have cached DNS/Wins stuff in there. How long ago
did you remove 5.5?
-Original Message-
From: Piper, Pat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 3:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Hodges, Mark; Parsons, John; Piper, Pat; Powers, Glenn
Subject
A better explanation of my problem, Exchange 5.5
server and outlook 2000 client.
User A is a delegate of user B's mailbox. User A
claims that in the past when he response to mails
within user B's inbox a copy of the sent message is
automatically saved in user B's mailbox without using
the cc opti
Q317865
-Original Message-
From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How to save replies in delegate's inbox
A better explanation of my problem, Exchange 5.5
server and outlook 2000 client.
User A is a delega
I got the exports to work successfully. Thanks to the people who recommended
the newer version of ExMerge.
HOWEVER, on stage 2 things fail miserably. When I specify the server to
import the mnessages to I get an "error getting informaiton store db." No
matter where I run the ExMerge from using the
Hi All,
Took a long time for that message to make the board. I posted yesterday
morning.
I found a solution to the issue(On the MS support site no less)and wanted
to share it with you just in case you run into this.
Microsoft Knowledge Base Article - Q277717 describes how to change the
displa
Hmmm, re-reading this, that is not exactly what you wanted is it?
I think you will need to either create a rule that CCs or do some coding.
Perhaps slipstick has something.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
Has anyone had any success in using a csv file to create a DL for contacts
in a public folder?
We have a 'contacts' public folder with 670 contacts.
I have a csv list of which contacts should go in which Distribution List.
I can create the DL manually, but is there a way to import the DL?
I cr
No, we're all lying to spite you.
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 3:07 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Admin.exe can no longer connect to Exch 5.5
> after W2K patch
>
>
> So you are all honestly telling
Add the address used as the from address in the spam messages to an empty
DL.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 5:33 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Anything I can do?
>
>
> Anything I can do?
>
> CRAFTY SPAM
Wendy --
Get a VPN product. The user will have to install the VPN client software at home,
but then they will be able to run Outlook 2000 (and just about anything else) over
their broadband connection.
Tom Gray, Network Engineer
All Kinds of Minds & The Center for Development and Learning
Un
You've got bad contacts at Microsoft then because that's certainly not the
case.
> -Original Message-
> From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 6:41 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: server access
>
>
> To quote Microsoft, "This is
Patient: Doctor, it hurts when I do this.
Doctor: Then don't do that.
Physician's billing department: That'll be $179.
> -Original Message-
> From: Olle Gustafson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 7:30 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Loops in Exchange
Last Sunday.
Pat
***
Exchange Administrator
Information Technology Group
Keene State College
Keene, NH 03435-2615
603 358-2172
When choosing between two evils, I always like to try the one I've never tried before.
--Mae West
-Origina
HMO: Sorry, that's not covered.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Loops in Exchange 5.5
Patient: Doctor, it hurts when I do this.
Doctor: Then don't do that.
Physician's bill
Shut down the MTA. It doesn't sound like you will be needing it any longer.
-Original Message-
From: Piper, Pat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 7:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Keep Getting Event ID 9318 and 4000
Last Sunday.
Pat
**
> * Install the Exchange 2000 version of the Active
> Directory Connector
Make sure it's the SP3 version.
> * Reconfigure the Internet Mail Connector to use the new server;
I'd remove the IMS since there's not really a way to configure it to use the
other server per se.
> * De-co
It really depends, there's insufficient data here to give a good answer to
that question.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:33 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Migrating from 5.5 to 2000
>
>
> I will be creating
If you don't know what the KM service is, odds are high you aren't using it.
I'd follow the Ed Crowley Move Server method described in the FAQ, based on
the information provided, I don't see a reason not to.
> -Original Message-
> From: Lewis, Erik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thu
Outlook? www.slipstick.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:16 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: How to save replies in delegate's inbox
>
>
> A better explanation of my problem, Exchange 5.5
> server and outlo
I doubled the raid 5 IS storage space last night and everything looked good
until this morning. It is still pegging the IS disk with reads. I turned
logging up to maximum but can't see anything out of line. Maintenance is
not running, Queues are clear. I found nothing in technet or the Knowled
Hello all,
I have a NT4sp6a Ex5.5SP4 environment. Users are all on Windows XP.
The issue I am having is that users are trying to update their information
in the GAL and are getting errors. They would enter their changes but the
GAL would not reflect these changes.
I am not having much luck find
Any of you have a recommendation on the best SPAM software to put on the
Exchange SMTP gateways???
TIA!
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/site
William,
Like I said yesterday...
I have been looking at the SurfControl products. They are a little spendy,
but if you are a large company, seems to be a product that is well worth the
money. Our quote came to right around $60k for 1000 user licenses, support
and contracts and the additional
Have you cranked up logging on the IS, and/or are you seeing anything of
note in the event log? Have you tried re-running performance optomizer?
Sometimes that will cure 'unusual' problems for no good reason.
-Original Message-
From: Sauer, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursd
I am running Surf as well and am very happy with it after getting fed up
with Trend's E-Content Manager.
- Original Message -
From: "Blunt, James H (Jim)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:58 AM
Subject: RE: SPAM Recommen
We use SurfControl for our Web Surfers, but didn't look at their Email
Package. Since we had already been a user of Symantec's Anti-Virus for
Exchange product, we continued with that trend and installed Symantec's
new Anti-Virus Content Filtering for Exchange Product.
So far it does enough for u
I was just reading about "Anti-Virus Content Filtering for Exchange "
yesterday, and I had a hard time figuring out exactly what expanded features
it had over NAV for Exchange. Or is it a replacement product?
Jim Helfer
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
It is the replacement product to be used when you switch from 5.5 to 2K.
It has a new GUI interface, so you don't have to mess with registry
settings to block new attachments, and also incorporates the Content
Filtering system.
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339
Team,
Please keep up
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 6:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Error 0X8004010F
I can't keep up.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursd
If it's E2K, or if it's 5.5 and you have a two-way ADC with an AD domain, I
have some perl code that uses LDAP to manage DL (AD groups, really)
membership. Let me know if you'd like it...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002
Thanks for all your replies..Ed..Jennifer...
Ok, if some one can throw some light on what is wrong with this picture, I
will really appreciate that. Here is how the permissions are assigned on
each of these components:
**
I have run into this problem, also. The answer is to do the second part
with v3.71 of ExMerge.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: More ExMerge Problems :(
I got the expor
I have never worked with (or knew of) such a program called
changeaddressbook.exe). Is it the changes NEVER show up or are you not
waiting long enough for them to replicate and be seen?
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, Au
The changes never appear.
It is a tool out of the BORK 4.5 to let users make changes to their contact
info in the GAL. I can't seem to dig any info up on it anywhere.
Josh
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:56 PM
Just so that we're clear: You're talking about "GALMOD32", right?
> -Original Message-
> From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 2:04 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Error using the changeaddressbook.exe from BORK
>
>
> The cha
Yes, that is exactly what we are using. We have embedded a link to it (as an
executable) in a page on our intranet site for users to access.
I believe that this may be some sort of permissions issue but am not sure
how to modify the permissions on the GAL to allow a user to modify their
informati
Trend Micro Emanager is a good spam and content filtering gateway.
-Original Message-
From: Williams Scott CTR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 8:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SPAM Recommendation
Any of you have a recommendation on the best SPAM soft
Normally there is no additional permission required to use GALMOD.
>From the BORK tools Help:
Using the GAL Modify Tool
If you want users to be able to modify information other than Notes for
either version of this tool, you must set appropriate permissions on the GAL
properties. For Microsoft
W2K-SP3
MSX2000-SP3
when we open perfmon and try to add a counter we just get a list of numbers
and no description, we tried articles Q275659 and Q248993 no solution we
reapplied MSX2000-sp3 and W2k-sp3 still the same.
Please Any suggestoins?
-er
___
Cool, I'll check that out.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 2:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Error using the changeaddressbook.exe from BORK
Normally there is no additional permission required to use GAL
One more question. I have a multi-site environment, do I need to make this
change to the specific site experiencing this issue or to any site in the
ORG?
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
S
Slightly off topic...
The outlook client configured for an exchange 5.5 server would perform
address resolution after the address was typed in the TO or CC field.
This could be seen because the address or username would be underlined
by a solid black line.
The outlook client configured against
I would call PSS.
Folder/Drive security permissions look fine though. AFAIK, that's the
default.
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Users have unlimited permissions(was: Never se
Ctrl-K
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution
---slightly off topic
Slightly off topic...
The outlook client configured for an
tools . options . preferences . email options . advanced email options
same as 98 and 2000.
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolutio
Tools/Options/E-Mail Options/Advanced E-Mail Options.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 2:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution
---slightly off topic
Is "Automatic Name Checking" Checked in Tools/Options/Email Options/Advanced
Email Options ?
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 2:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolut
I don't believe the everyone group needs send as and receive as rights on
the information store object, someone has been changing things... Perhaps
the reason someone set those permissions is listed in your change log. On my
mailbox store, the everyone group has inherited "Create named properties.
In 2002 it is.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 3:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution ---s
lightly off topic
Is "Automatic Name Checking" Checke
Are you running Consistency checker correctly? Double check your settings
maybe.
>-Original Message-
>From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:48 PM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: RE: More ExMerge Problems :(
>
>
>I have run into this
Automatic is for kids and executives. Use Ctrl-K
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution ---s
lightly off topic
Is "Automatic N
Yeah, I know that automatic is for kids. That's why I use it. I don't
wanna grow up, I'm a Toys R US kid . . . . =;-)
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 3:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlo
Isnt that option avail in 2000 as well?
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution ---s
lightly off topic
In 2002 it is
You may be right. I may be crazy.
I chose the first option under Private Store and All Inconsistencies.
- Original Message -
From: "EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 3:28 PM
Subje
As much as I have appreciated everybody's responses all the solutions
offered do not solve the problem I am faced with.
Suggestion: CNTRL-K - this does force name checking but I don't want the
user to have to initiate this.
Suggestion: Tools/Options/Email Options/Advanced Email Options/sugges
No, Special K is for executives. The rest of us prefer automation as it
leads to relaxation. [1]
[1] Apologies to ASB.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 3:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, out
Not that option - the 'automatic name checking' option...
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address
resolution---slightly off topic
As mu
>>>However a message must have already been sent to the user previously, if
that is the case
>>>then when I'm typing I the name outlook will autofill and complete the
address.
Yes, that is how the "Suggest Names" feature works. The "Automatic Name
Checking" feature however will underline with an
We are using it for Inbound-Virus only and it's fine.
Win2k-Ex2k with Mail Essentials Gateway 6 on the exchange server under
40 users.
I don't think it can block a single user just domain.
The filter works but I'm not raving about it.
Easy to set up and little maintenance.
Support is week at best.
The automatic name checking box has been checked all this time.
Let me look into this smore and I'll get back to everybody when I find
out more info.
Thanks again for your replies
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 2:17
Q247729: XCLN: Error Message: The Command You Specified Could Not Be
Carried Out
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q247729
I had a client that was using autoscripts to resources. She booked.
Received a confirm from the resource and yet the booking didn't take place
on the r
Hi Everyone,
One of our staff has just received an Undeliverable notification re an
external e-mail that was sent 3 days ago. I'm just wondering where the
settings for the delivery timeout and notifications are buried. I'd like to
set notifications re undeliverable e-mail to alert users within a
Arrhhh... as I suspected. Ok, cheers, I'll struggle on alone.
___
> No, we're all lying to spite you.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Peter Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 3:07 AM
> > To: Exchange Discuss
Internet Mail Service / Connections tab / Time-outs button.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 30 August 2002 00:56
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Undeliverable
Subject: Undeliverable
Hi Everyone,
One of our staff has just
94 matches
Mail list logo