Why a difference of opinion on a single subject causes you to
continually complain and be rude is beyond my ability to comprehend. I
would prefer if you found it within yourself to get over it, move on and
be civil. I have.
I just have one question about this. If you've moved on, then why did
you
Here's a perfect example of people picking fights just to pick fights. Let
me break this down for you.
1. I posted a question to a community that is supposedly there to help one
and all, a community I helped build
2. I get a rude reply from Ed
3. I brush this off and simply tell Ed to play nice
4.
Nice job, Yoda.
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 7:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
I think what is at issue here is that in the past you have spent time in
this group bashing on the major posters, a number of which are MS MVP's. You
insult us by calling us unethical as we have accepted small gifts from MS as
part of our MVP status. And though you may not believe it, most of us
Can I get an Amen!
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 7:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
First off, don't drink the Koolaid that says BCV snaps of Exchange are a
good idea. At least not yet - not until there is native (i.e. written by
Microsoft) support for pausing IO and acquiescing of the database prior to a
snapshot being taken. Even then, it is NOT the zero downtime solution that
The online exchange defragmenter does a nice job of keeping the databases
maintained. There is no reason to do an offline defrag unless you've hit
the 16Gb limit in Exchange Standard edition -or- something has gotten really
screwed up in the database and exchange cannot rebuild the store from the
You get points for finding a way to work 31337 into an Exchange discussion
list.
Way to go you hax0r.
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL
Sorry, all out. I have one hallelujah left though ...:-) It's nearly
Christmas!
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 December 2003 03:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Can I get an Amen!
Eric Fretz
L-3
Have you seen a mental health professional lately?
I had the decidedly unfortunate experience to have inherited ArcServe when I
started here. And I'll freely admit that I was able to get it to both backup
and restore both files and Exchange databases. It took 10 times longer to
set up and
No, but mydotcomcanbeatupyour.com is a registered domain of a former
coworker of mine.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi,
Running MS Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 on Windows NT4
Single server environment, server sits on private address behind Sonicwall
ProVX firewall
Firewall forwards all SMTP to this server which has the IMC, has worked fine
for a number of years
Mail has stopped reaching mailboxes, and doesnt
Actually, you can't snoop the SSL traffic. Ok, you can, but its worthless.
I'd suggest an SSL accelerator (either hardware or software) sitting in the
DMZ, passing unencrypted traffic between the DMZ and a front end server on
the internal network. We've been doing that for about 18 months without
Hi,
Running MS Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 on Windows NT4
Single server environment, server sits on private address behind Sonicwall
ProVX firewall
Firewall forwards all SMTP to this server which has the IMC, has worked fine
for a number of years
Mail has stopped reaching mailboxes, and
Or a Happy Hanukkah or Merry Kwanza to those of us who observe one of
them...
Only a handful here will get the reference, but I had occasion to share the
story of Peter Frampton and the Rabbi last weekend
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad
LOL!
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, December 11, 2003 9:14 AM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Subject: RE: Migrating from
I have used both veritas and CA and I must say while both are excellent
I prefer the GFS rotation of CA. As far as the interface I have no
problem with it.
Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr.
Director of IT
Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky Co. L.L.C.
101 Eisenhower pky
Roseland NJ, 07068
-Original
It is a very interesting to see all the respond to the initial question of Greg. Only
4 acceptable answer. How many time lose to read the scrap the other specialist!!!, for
me this kind of list is to help anybody to find a solution for a particular problem.
If a people can not help, please do
The address you have which I assume is your firewall is not accepting
connections. Look at your firewall logs...
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 8:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange
If you haven't used the latest version of BackupExec, then you haven't
really used it. I also used Arcserve and detested it. The speeds with
Arcserve were slow, I couldn't do a restore without having to use
eseutil and/or isinteg, and I also didn't like the interface. I much
prefer my
Because Microsoft and Security are synonymous, of course!
If one chooses to put their FE server in the DMZ, open the bazillion ports
required to connect to the BE server and the FE server gets compromised in
any way. You have just opened the door to your internal network. Some
might say, the
No, it should be on the edge of your network... ;o)
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 3:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP
Shouldn't the ISA server be in the DMZ?
-Original Message-
From:
Davinder,
What are the 7 ports? Might they not be more risk than just 25 and 443?
Risks are all around us, it's up to us to determine what level of risk we're
willing to accept...
-Original Message-
From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003
But you don't have to open those 20 ports to the entire world. You can
only specify that the FE should be able to talk to the BE and the DCs. I
agree - it is more work to set up and maintain.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
The Exchange component of TSM works well...if you're a TSM shop.
Regards,
Orin
Orin Rehorst
Port of Houston Authority
(Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage)
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (713)670-2443
Fax: (713)670-2457
TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html
-Original
Well, of course, but what if the FE gets compromised? It's still allowed to
talk to the BE and DC's, right? Problem still exists...
We can all debate this till we're blue in the face, but the fact is, putting
an FE server in the DMZ only gives you a false sense of security. It's no
more or no
We use Netbackup Datacenter 4.5 and while the interface is clunkier than
backup exec imo, the speeds have been tremendous and the system itself has
been very reliable. Supposedly it will back up straight from a san but we
haven't hooked it up to ours yet.
Jason
From: Ben Winzenz [EMAIL
I do not believe that I have ever bashed anyone. I have expressed my
opinion. Honorary titles and gifts are a conflict of interest and hence
not something that professional IT people should engage in, period. You
can justify it all you want to yourself but it does not change the fact
that it is a
Ok Mr. I help build this community,
Here's my opinion...
You're like a hemorrhoid and no amount of Preparation H is making you go
away... :(
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 9:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
I concur. We have TSM here at Spherion and I am growing to like it. The
back-end of TSM is taken care of by *nix guys, so I don't know how easy
it is to configure and maintain it there. But on the Exchange server
side it is very straightforward and works very well.
Our Exchange servers are on a
I think Netbackup allows tape multiplexing which greatly increases
backup speeds, but could be a pain during restores - data would need to
be de-multiplexed.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Jason
As I said... it's set to never expire and it has not. She is able to send
and receive email, she just keeps getting prompted for her password.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
I'm assuming the external interface on the SW has a public IP and the
internal interface has a private IP and you are attempting to NAT you
connection.
In the Sonicwall, under the advanced setting, you should have it setup under
one-to-one NAT the public/private translation for your Exchange
Here's some philosophy for you. Those you hold in contempt will very likely
hold you in contempt. You are the only person from whom I've ever heard
such an opinion. Perhaps if you were a little circumspect you might begin
to see that your insulting belief is on the fringe and to continue to
I'm sorry. The title of this discussion list is Exchange Discussions, not
Exchange Help Line. You are not the arbiter; I shall discuss what I choose
to discuss.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original
Kick his a$$ seabass!
_
John Bowles
Exchange Engineer
OIG/HHS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Crowley
[MVP]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Read my earlier post. Especially the part about being circumspect.
As to your claim about what MVPs said about small gifts, you are simply a
liar; there's no better term for it. I have the archives, and I remember
very clearly what I typed and others posted, but I choose not to go research
Facts are facts.
Ok Mr. I help build this community,
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To
I do not hold you or anyone in contempt. I believe that your actions are
wrong and hurt IT professionalism as a whole. My beliefs may be on the
fringe, but that does not make them any less correct.
I have never tried to offend, only to educate. I cannot help if people get
offended, but it does
Huh?
I'm sorry. The title of this discussion list is Exchange Discussions, not
Exchange Help Line. You are not the arbiter; I shall discuss what I choose
to discuss.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
I'm still partial to doing a manual rotation scheme, but maybe that's just
old school. I also have a large number of systems for which we do daily full
backups. I also prefer to do differentials rather than incrementals, which
means GFS doesn't usually work so well.
Roger
And fiction is fiction... Your point?
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Facts are facts.
Ok Mr. I help build this community,
Did ya hear that sound?
It was a whoosh right over your head...
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Huh?
I'm sorry. The title of this discussion
Well, our recollections are different. My recollection is that the MVP's
swore up and down that they did not get compensated. I may have missed
something in the deluge of postings and it was quite a while ago so I may
not have a perfect recollection of this.
To term this lying is simply
Greg, can you please give up now? I'd really appreciate if you just kneeled down and
bow to us immediatelywuhahahahahahaha! Come to the darks side Greg...
Let go...
_
John Bowles
Exchange Engineer
OIG/HHS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sure thing guy, the response did not follow the discussion thread.
Did ya hear that sound?
It was a whoosh right over your head...
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
So a gift for a job well done is now compensation? I'll have to keep that
one in mind, I never realized I was paying people for Xmas, Birthdays,
Anniversaries, and the like...
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:46 AM
To:
In one of these WOB emails from you, you stated that we were here to provide
support... I'd go dig it up, but quite frankly, I'm not interested in the
words that protrude from any holes on your body...
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
No, You are wrong.
Explain to me how you can tell someone that they are unethical AND not
expect it to be taken as an insult. You feel justified in your position and
that is fine. When you come into a public forum and say that anyone who is
an MVP is unethical, you cannot expect MVPs to take it
What do the firewall logs show?
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 8:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server
Hi,
Running MS Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 on Windows NT4
Single server
You meant morally-uptight right? :P
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
No, You are wrong.
Explain to me how you can tell someone that they are
Honestly I wasn't trying to get in a fight. Getting into an internet fight
is like the special Olympics, even if you win, you're still retarded. My
point was that if you truly were over it you wouldn't have had the need to
fell like you had respond.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
We are very happy with Commvault Galaxy, but your not looking at that.
-Original Message-
From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Best backup software for Exchange
We are looking at Networker and
I did not say what you say I said.
What I said was that, in my opinion, accepting honorary titles from
vendors is a conflict of interest and something that should be avoided by
those who are, or; technically, consider themselves, professional IT
people. That is my opinion. And this is not just my
All I was doing by responding was to attempt to get back to a common
ground of civility.
Honestly I wasn't trying to get in a fight. Getting into an internet fight
is like the special Olympics, even if you win, you're still retarded. My
point was that if you truly were over it you wouldn't
Then why do it on the list? Why not e-mail Ed directly?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 8:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
All I was doing by
Honestly, didn't occur to me, but then you could ask similar questions
about a lot of the messages that flow through this list.
Then why do it on the list? Why not e-mail Ed directly?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Yep please keep all that garbage out of the news group,
Now we have around 20 e-mails - just to trow in the trash
This is a Exchange Discussion group - not a discussion in a Kindergarten...
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne af Greg Deckler
He should change the direction of his scope. :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Best backup software for Exchange
We are very happy with Commvault Galaxy, but your
As Ferris Bueler once said, He so uptight, if you put a lump of coal up his
a$$, you'd have a diamond in 2 weeks!
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don
OK, I have thus far been unsuccessful in getting GBMT to work against a
6.5 PO. I've pretty much given up hope that this is going to work, which
is not necessarily a huge problem since there are only 700 mailboxes to
migrate. I have tested this with both the 5.2.6 GW client and the 6.5 GW
client
In the past 5 years we went from CA ArcServe to Veritas BackupExec to
CommVault Galaxy. We are very happy with the CommVault solution. We backup
over SAN fiber fabric, a dedicated GB backend server network and the user's
100MB network. It is very fast and resilient. It is worth your time to
check out other professions and their views on accepting honorary titles.
googling
Dr. receives honorary degree
lawyer receives honorary degree
Just for reference.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:25 AM
To: Exchange
All,
I'm trying to figure out what is the best design (hardware wise) for a SBS server that
I will be setting up here in the future. I'm trying to figure out what is the best
way to maximize the server's resources with the setup. One question I do have is.
When you setup SBS can you point
Hi there
Yeah, the public and private IPs/NAT are all setup as is port forwarding,
has been working for ages, no idea why its stopped now
I think over the weekend I'll move the Exchange Server outside the firewall
and see what happens
Anything I can check on the Exch server?
thanks
They don't show errors, just blocked websites and such, they arent very
detailed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: 11 December 2003 16:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server
What do the
Some more information on Professional Ethic
http://www.westga.edu/~rlane/professional/lecture_professionsprofessionaliz
ation2.html
For those with any interest.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:25 AM
To: Exchange
They will if you crank up the logging
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server
They don't show errors, just blocked
I go by...
Lots of RAM but not more the 2GB
As much CPU as I/they can afford
SCSI disks preferrend but fast IDE for small user count...
SCSI tape drive for sure..20GB dat4
usually default type install
I have not done a W2K3 SBS yet but have 2 scheduled... for like 5 and 10
user shop's
since I
Surely the firewall logs must show which SMTP connections are accepted or
dropped.
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server
They don't show
Go into Log, Log Settings, at the bottom check on Dropped TCP Connections
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server
Start doing various Telnet tests on port 25 (from outside to your
firewall, from firewall to the Exchange server).
You can go to http://www.network-tools.com and from there you could do a
variety of tests too.
For example, you could stick your e-mail address there, then select
E-mail Validation,
Pepsi.
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Some more information on Professional Ethic
http://www.westga.edu/~rlane/professional/lecture_professionsprofessionaliz
From that page,
2. A profession involves a system of symbolic rewards -- a system of
rewards (monetary and honorary) that is primarily a set of symbols of work
achievement and thus ends in themselves, not means to some end of individual
self-interest. (36)
* Honorary rewards are
GD wrote:
Honorary titles and gifts are a conflict of interest and hence
not something that professional IT people should engage in, period.
I can perhaps understand why an employer might take this stance but why
would I, or anyone else on the list care?
They're telling us things not selling us
It's not your Exchange server if your MX record points to your FW. I
telnetted to your MX and the connection failed...
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP mail not
We also use TSM and it is great for our Exchange 5.5 system or anything else
with few but large files.
It's pretty easy to work with once you get used to it.
We're going to have to mess around with our SAN config to allow for a
restore domain for Exchange 2000 but that's our problem (as is the
These types of fights happen every few months on this list, and they are
always aired in public.
The resulting witch hunts can go too far, we should try and stop the insults
when personal slurs are made at people's reputations. No individual becomes
a winner or loser, just the list as good
Well, yes, I would expect that to be the extent of your research.
degree title
check out other professions and their views on accepting honorary titles.
googling
Dr. receives honorary degree
lawyer receives honorary degree
Just for reference.
-Original Message-
From: Greg
Do you mean the apps themselves, or their data files?
I've installed a couple of SBS 2K servers and don't remember any option
to change the location of ISA, Exchange, etc (but then again, I wasn't
looking for it, either).
You can, however, change the location of the applications' data files,
Look, if you cannot understand the difference then you are simply not
trying. Did you miss the word from vendors? Honorary titles, medals and
other stuff granted on behalf of a professional society to its members is
one thing. Vendors are completely different. If a doctor accepted an
honorary
I didn't ask for thanks. I was simply pointing out that I have been here
from the beginning and have posted a lot of useful information and as such
deserve at least the illusion of civility.
GD wrote:
Honorary titles and gifts are a conflict of interest and hence
not something that
Actually, degree DOES equal title.
One day, I am just ordinary old Jim Blunt. The next day Washington State
Univ. bestows an honorary doctorate in Computer Engineering, due to some
mythical contributions I have made to the industry.
My signature would now read:
DR. James Blunt, Computer
Im Dr. Love.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Actually, degree DOES equal title.
One day, I am just ordinary old Jim Blunt. The next
Interestingly enough you state that you are a professional and yet make a
statement like that. I in no way have attacked you and only posted those
(and another link) on professionals and ethics. My statement was not an
attack, only a point of reference. If you remember, I was also the only
person
Pepsi.
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Interestingly enough you state that you are a professional and yet make a
statement like that. I in no way have attacked you and
Concur
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Pepsi.
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim
Sent: Thursday,
I heard you have operating privileges at the local bath house.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Im Dr. Love.
Hello everyone.
We have Dell PowerEdge 6650 servers attached to the SAN via Emulex
LightPulse cards. It's working great.
Now we are setting everything up for a SAN backup using TSM LanFree.
We don't have additional Emulex cards and the management does not want
to pay extra money for them. But
note to self...Dip self in liquid latex piror...if ever meet these guy's
in person
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
I heard you have
The reason I brought the extra controller was the fact that I'll be using the entire
SBS and the System drives on one Controller. I still have a 3rd party application
that needs to be installed on this computer as well. So I'm wondering if I should get
a secondary controller and set it up
Ok, heres a report from network-tools
Interestingly, the address it picks up for our mailgate is wrong, its our
old one
about 10 days ago we switched from 62.49.146.170 to 80.176.164.194
If I do an nslookup - set type=mx - partition.co.uk
Then it gives me the right gateway, can you possibly try
Hi Don
What address do you see as my MX?
It should be 80.176.164.194
Thanks a lot for the help
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: 11 December 2003 18:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange
I apologize. I responded and did not pay attention to the actual from
address. I thought that you were that yoda guy.
Interestingly enough you state that you are a professional and yet make a
statement like that. I in no way have attacked you and only posted those
(and another link) on
Sorry, I should have been more clear. I will restate this for seemingly
the 11 millionth time. Accepting titles FROM VENDORS is bad and
unprofessional.
Actually, degree DOES equal title.
One day, I am just ordinary old Jim Blunt. The next day Washington State
Univ. bestows an honorary
Ok, that's great. Can you stop posting now? ummkay thanks.
_
John Bowles
Exchange Engineer
OIG/HHS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Thursday, December
That would be Hemmoroid.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 12 December 2003 3:55 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Ok Mr. I help build this community,
Here's my opinion...
You're like a hemorrhoid and no
By the way, I am still waiting for my book...
-Original Message-
From: David Grimstone (DSLWN) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
That would be Hemmoroid.
-Original Message-
I never received mine either.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hutchins, Mike
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
By the way, I am still waiting for my book...
Gosh, Greg, it's so nice to know that we can rely on you to stir up this
conversation every six months or so so that the new folks will get to know a
little history of the list.
Anyway, this whole diatribe was started because Ed admitted that he's a
vendor whore. What I'm not understanding is
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
