Let me guess, HP.com?
All depends on the traffic - ISDN would do...
PBB.
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Kiran, Murat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 March 2002 10:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: The Best Idea
Hi folks,
5 exchagne 5.5 organisations being in a short time one
Exchange
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 March 2002 01:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Transaction Logs
Reuses what?
-Original Message-
From: Arshad Rafat Khan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 1:
Someone is reading that mail...!
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Roger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March 2002 18:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 Inbox problem
I have a user who's e-mail going to the inbox is being marked as read even
when the client is clo
I betcha someone else is reading them!
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Roger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March 2002 15:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 Inbox problem
I have a mail box that when new messages arive they are marked as read
after 70 seconds or
ARGH! - I missed the fact you are using a router! -- What router (please say
Cisco x)??
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Arshad Rafat Khan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March 2002 06:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: exchange over ISDN
We have a ISDN connection, which i
You need to configure the ISDN as a virtual modem (using the elsa
terminology, sorry) and then get the ex dialup to use this.
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Arshad Rafat Khan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March 2002 06:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: exchange over ISDN
Erm, the permissions tab!
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March 2002 21:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Permissions Problem on a Mailbox
Ok now I'm feeling REALLY stupid... User permission from exchange admin... I
know whe
Tony,
If a user opens an item in a PF and 'sends' it back then you will get a
duplicate. If changes are supposed to be made to the item in the PF then
the correct way to update the entry is to Save it and duplicate problem will
not happen.
OTOH it could be that your PF home server is having a b
Those drugs must be the purest ever!
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March 2002 18:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR's (was content)
Chim-Chimie-ry Chim-Chimie-ry Chim-Chim-Churoo
No mx, no mx, no mx for you.
-Original
the
switch interface. Also replaced all nics. Still the same issue. Should be
fun. I really appreciate all the input. I'll let you know the fix but I'm
sure it will be a site specific issue & not much help in the future.
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Bouzan"
l the information I had.
Anyway, it'll probably be something silly like having auto-negotiation
enabled on the switch. :)
Tom.
-Original Message-----
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a
Tony,
Great news. Have a good day!
PBB.
-Original Message-
From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March 2002 01:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disappearing e-mail in Outlook folders (Exch 5.5 SP 4)
Hi Paul,
Thanks very much for the advice. I did what you
would mention it so that if John
confirmed the cause was network congestion, he'd know there was a potential
solution available for that particular scenario.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:28 PM
To: Exchang
Hi Tony,
Yeah, the sp upgrade is crucial to every file. I cannot vouch for your
particular problem but with most probs after an sp this is the most usual
issue. I had a major crash last night which got me onto a 23 hour day and
two hours of it could have been saved if the admin had actually ran
Did you skip any files that the SP update said were in use? You MUST
upgrade every last bit.
I would suggest re-running SP4, ensure that perfmon isn't running and
ensuring that every file is updated. If it stops on a file that cannot be
updated then bosh out of the upgrade, rename the existing
Shot in the dark and I haven't got my IIS servers in front of me but is the
bit that says 'How many users should this site be optimised for' not set to
somehing silly like less than 10 or something...?
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 1
John, you don't give any indication that the clients fail to connect and/or
timeout.
I use Outlook XP at home to my 5.5 boxes at work via ISDN. Routing is from
an 801 at home to a 3640 at work and I get requesting data (rd) all the
time. Nothing serious but just latency - usually only for a few
> Jim
>
>
>
>
> >Installing Windows and Office is defintely not the problem
> but most users
> have all >theese small unnecessary tools, individually configured for
> their use. But >>
> >fortunately it takes their time to reinstall. Its just thi
takes their time to reinstall. Its just this
whimpering noise, which is so disturbing;)
regards
Elmer
> -Original Message-----
> From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 2:08 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Problem w
ubject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows
That is what we are doing right now. Thank you anyway.
regards
Elmer
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 8:44 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject:
Hehe! - Mine didn't either. But then it does a great job of catching every
other email from our Co's solicitors to the chief executive with legal guff
in them!!
Friggin' Mimesweeper!
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 March 2002 18:29
rmation Store not available
> press 'ok'
> Error 2: Exchange Adress Book is not able to connect to the
> server. (something similar in german...)
>
> :(
>
> Maybe an RPC-Problem. I am just checking, but so far with no result.
>
>
> Maybe I will check gh
that.
-Original Message-----
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 5:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT outlook ops
Create the rule and then check the tickbox at the end that says "Run this
rule now on messages already in the xxx"
Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 6:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: late answer YS
Argh!
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 March 2002 14:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
Argh!
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 March 2002 14:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: late answer YS
Due to a technical problem with the YS ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) address your message
was qeued and is now being processed. You will r
make sure the user is not logged in anywhere first. Go into Control
Panel/Mail and delete the Exchange Server Component. Fire up Outlook, it
should ask you which type of service you want to run, select Exchange server
and fill out dem boxes!
Ghost is a drive imaging application - very very hand
and delete the emails.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 5:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT outlook ops
Thats settled then
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05
Thats settled then
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 March 2002 13:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT outlook ops
Agreed number one.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March
But, be prepared for some people to get multiple copies which is going to
look poor IMHO.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT outlook ops
Create the rule and then check the
: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT outlook ops
how do I create a rule to check unread messages
-Original Message-----
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 March, 2002 11:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT outlook ops
Kim,
Well, you could create a
Kim,
Well, you could create a rule that replies to every unread email with a
standard message apologising and ask the rules wizard to run it on messages
already in the mailbox - but quite why you want to classify yourself as a
spammer I really don't know!
If she has to reply to them anyway would
OOF's only fire one per sender - internally or externally. It's the
allowing automatic replies to the Internet that causes the mail loops as
these do not discriminate.
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 March 2002 20:11
To: Exchange
OK, so I managed to sucessfully move my ageing first 5.5 box over to a new -
much rather well-endowed DL380 using the Ed C move server method, thanks Ed!
The only thing that wouldn't play ball was the org forms. OK, so I only had
a couple in there but they didn't go over even after allowing a wee
OK, but the symptoms are very much the same. Have you set any limits on the
profile sizes?
(p.s. - Don't chop the thread off - this enables others to add comment
without having to scan back through the messages)
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Jake Wallendal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
I had this issue when I prevented the Internet History folder from roaming
with the profile. Couldn't tell you why this folder is needed for the
opening of attachments other than a temporary storage area I suppose but
re-enabled it and all was well.
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Ja
The path on NT4 is Start/programs/admin tools/event log!!
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Pelfrey, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 January 2002 14:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMS Diagnostics Logging Path?
All,
I've searched and can't find any doc that tells me w
;-}
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 14:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion
OK thanks. Simple is good.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17
Roger
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 13:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW
Roger,
I haven't had the pleasure of installing any version of office previous to
2K on a TS so I wouldn't know
one of the DAT files to find a particular string, and then run Find
File against the MTADATA directory in order to search against that string?
Harold
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
r. When you say 'transformed', what are
you referring to?
Cheers, Roger
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 12:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW
Was Outlook Transformed to work with TS?
Ouch!
Had a similar issue over xmas but you can add another 0 to that item
count CR went nutty on a full hotmail account.
Best way I found was to use find files to search for a unique line in the
spam and keep on deleting them as they list up in the FF dialogue.
PBB
~ndi
-Original Mes
Stick 'em in a spare PC and see what the BIOS reports...?
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 13:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RAM
Check this site out for deciphering the RAM markings...
http://www.arstechni
Was Outlook Transformed to work with TS?
We use W2K AS with TS to provide our Accounts with the means to run a legacy
Access database that has grown so fat it needs a dual 1Gig + 512Mb RAM to
process the queries (yes, I know - what a waste but the migration to SQL is
happening slowly).
Anyway ba
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 January 2002 20:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files
In which case, I am an outstanding admin.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: T
gards,
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Anti-Spam
Irfan, you could run Mail Essentials and Groupshield together but you give
no indication of the spec of your hardware so if
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 16 January 2002 09:24
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: Anti-Spam
Subject: RE: Anti-Spam
I know paul, but question is can I run mail essential on the server running
group shield. Is there any performance related issues etc.
-Original Message---
Groupshield guards against viruses, Mail Essentials (or Mimesweeper or
whatever) provides the means to prevent spam etc...
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 January 2002 04:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anti-Spam
I am already
What OS on the laptops?
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 January 2002 21:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Problem
Well, I just did what you guys suggested. I went to each BDC and stopped
and restarted the NetLogon
No reconfiguration needed.
Bring up new box and move the mailboxes. Once done just leave the old
server running and Outlook will magically notice that the mailboxes have
moved and connect to the new box.
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Sakti Chakravarty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
S
After making the change you have to restart the IMS otherwise it will not
work..
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Wei Yan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 January 2002 17:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sending HTML
Exchange 5.5 SP4
The Internet Mail Service server is confi
Use the existing one until the move is complete and all up and working OK.
Then follow the Q doc on changing the service account as it will affect more
than just the one server (that is if you have more than one exchange box in
your org)
Rgds
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Mellott,
ginal Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 2:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight
Mr Blackstone,
I am totally disgusted at your flagrant disregard for some decorum on this
list. Would you please stick to the subject in hand i.e. Exc
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Bouzan
Sent: January 14, 2002 5:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight
I know, that Mr Blackstone and the Dogg-person really get my goat up
with their constant references to sexual inuendo. It shouldn't be
allowed! Mr Lefk
A shameless plug![1]
[1] - Hi Martin!
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 January 2002 22:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Book Purchase - Tony Redmond
www.exchange-mail.org
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
E
22:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight
This is related. At least he said Spack it, instead of Spank it! ;o)
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 2:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight
Mr Black
Mr Blackstone,
I am totally disgusted at your flagrant disregard for some decorum on this
list. Would you please stick to the subject in hand i.e. Exchange Issues
and not some idle banter that wastes our time.
Kind regards
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[
What does the event log say? - It may also be prudent to turn logging up to
maximum for the time being as well.
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Colin J Revell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 January 2002 10:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Information Store Stopping...
Hi a
: New year, no contract
I might be wrong; Maybe she was talking about those three whatzits who sing
that christmas song. You know the one, "Me, I want a hula hoop"?
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8
Double-stuff as well!
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 January 2002 14:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract
m
Oreos...
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wed
sing
that christmas song. You know the one, "Me, I want a hula hoop"?
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:09 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: New year, no contract
>
>
>
I thought she meant those rather large male-models that women tend to swoon
over...
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 January 2002 11:55
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract
They're so cute in that episode when the
Do a Directory Export from Exchange, wack it into Excel and then use that to
populate your intranet?
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 January 2002 06:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange and Intranet
Upgrade to win2k and
last one in the site as in there are no other servers in
the site makes it special.
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Bouzan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 12:18 PM
Subject: RE: home ser
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 December 2001 18:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: home server?
Stolen? Share this story!!
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: home server?
Thats interesting Gary - I'm in Crawley as well!
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 December 2001 16:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract
Thank you Serdar - I appreciate that.
Paul - I'm going to walk away f
Chris,
What are the concerns about the last server in the site? I must admit to
not ever seeing any warnings regarding this in all my education. I only ask
because what was effectively my last server in the site was stolen a month
ago! This is all assuming we are talking 5.5...
Regards
PBB
~
We're not right now (hopefully never!) but we still have to geared up to
accept and deal with it.
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 December 2001 15:24
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract
A Euro (sp?) is runnin
E-mail Admin
Network & Infrastructure Group
Bechtel Hanford, Inc.
509-372-9188
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Scanners
~ndi
Mailsweeper is my favorite as well. Make
~ndi
Mailsweeper is my favorite as well. Make sure you use the Mcafee 470 DOS
version of their AV software and use Baltimore's method of deploying it.
Its fast, efficient and reliable - it even caught the latest nasties and
stopped them as Undetermined until I have the dat in place to catch them
~ndi
Tony has a valid point - what server is doing what, this is the key.
The rule of thumb is;
5.5 webmail can see E2K mailboxes - E2K webmail cannot see 5.5 mailboxes.
I have just had a very steep take-on of users of my 5.5 webmail over the
past 3 months (~300 users) and the questions rega
ECTED]]
Sent: 05 December 2001 23:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exch 2k Prep
Not physically just virtually but there's the rub
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Bouzan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: We
I know ;-}
PBB
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 December 2001 23:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exch 2k Prep
Not physically just virtually but there's the rub
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Bouzan" <[EM
Yes there is, don't lie!
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 December 2001 21:56
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exch 2k Prep
Their is no M drive..
I repeat their NO M drive.. And there dam well aren't 17 of them
--
Kevinm M WLKM
-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 3:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How can the Admin delete a message from a users mailbox?
~ndi
AH-ha! - So opening the users mailbox alongside your own would do the
trick..!
PBB
-Original
~ndi
AH-ha! - So opening the users mailbox alongside your own would do the
trick..!
PBB
-Original Message-
From: Lyall D. Shepperd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 December 2001 20:51
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How can the Admin delete a message from a users mailbox?
I
mailbox?
In 2000, you need to take several steps to grant such permission. Ref.
Q268754
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How can the Admin delete a message from a users
~ndi
Open the users mailbox alongside yours?
PBB
-Original Message-
From: Lyall D. Shepperd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 December 2001 19:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How can the Admin delete a message from a users mailbox?
How can the Admin delete a message from a us
it stays fresh and gets purged after just
a short length of time works for us.
--
Robert Moir,
IT Systems Engineer,
Luton Sixth Form College
"Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings"
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
~ndi
Well, I'm happy someone else brought the subject up as I was going to slyly
ask if anyone had a means of 'controlling' the amount of cached/temporary
internet data so that my roaming profiles didn't take hours to load. I know
there is a limit profile size in Profile editor and the setting c
f
the registry editing or anything. Make sure they are logged out first.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 December 2001 14:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subjec
Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q268/7/44.ASP
Try this.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
?
Is http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q264/7/31.ASP
relevant?
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 04 Dece
~ndi
EX5.5 sp4 - 1 site, 11 servers - all attached via leased lines. Clients are
all O2K on NT4 sp6a - identical builds.
Random users at different sites complain of the inability to open
attachments, getting a failure because of a lack of permissions. The
not-so-helpful help message suggests s
~ndi
I love the sig.
p.s. - have you replaced the pliers on your shower with vise grips yet or
have you actually fixed it (cos I ain't!)?
PBB
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 December 2001 20:56
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K GAL . Lo
Jim,
Happens to me all the time. Do not attach anything to your message and also
I tend to get rejections based on the fact that I have the unsub line in my
mail. I now delete the footers inserted automatically as well before
responding. When I used to use OWA it happened on every mailing I sen
Ken,
Users rarely delete items anyway (based on the 500+ hoarders I have!) so I
think you would not find any noticeable size increases...
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 November 2001 15:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Impact on Priv
Nate,
In my case all of the desktops are new (less than 6 months old) Compaq
Deskpro EN's PIII866 upwards, 128Mb memory and oodles of HDD space
available. Protocols are all IP and bindings are fine. Attachment sizes
are below 2-3Mb. Mcafee Vscan is used on all desktops - updating via FTP to
my
nal Message-
> From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 6:16 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown
>
>
> Interesting.
>
> Very few members of this list have Ex on DC's for the
-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 5:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown
It's becoming one of those unexplained things. I've been having those
late-night keeping-me-awake-thoughts o
Hehe!
-Original Message-
From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 November 2001 23:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown
Believe me I have become a perfmon master - all the counters indicate the
server is a rocket ship. I ha
the
spring we replaced some server switches with some high end 10/100 3com ones.
It just does not make any sense unless of course the Database size combined
with the number of users and load is the issue.
Regards,
Shawn
-Original Message-----
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sen
Jeff,
My perfmons show very little is happening that could be attributed to
bottlenecking but the reboot option has yet to be exorcised. I'm a bit of a
fan of keeping servers up as I trust NT to do it's job but sometimes I
suppose there is only one way to find out...
Thanks
Paul.
-Origin
Thanks
Shawn
-----Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown
~ndi
Ironically I get pretty much the same as you, bad slowdown at peak times.
Now, my
~ndi
Ironically I get pretty much the same as you, bad slowdown at peak times.
Now, my exchange box is a BDC which I know is against the rules but I
inherited it from old and do not have the resource (read time) to migrate
until the new year. Is yours a DC? - If so this may be the pattern. FYI,
~ndi
Paul, why do you want footers on internal mail? - just asking not bugging...
PBB
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 November 2001 22:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Email footers enforced
Ugh. Sounds like a huge PITA. You'd ha
~ndi
Count yourself lucky, I AM the boss and I still end up in the office 'till
9pm each night!
Damn minions want to get to the pub on time!
PBB
-Original Message-
From: Desmond Witherspoon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 November 2001 21:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
! Go there now!
Having had it with the two of them, God's punishment was that Adam and Eve
should have children of their own. Thus, the pattern was set and it has
never
changed.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Bouzan
Sent: Friday
~ndi
OWA 5.5 can be used for 5.5 and 2K but OWA 2K can only do 2K and not 5.5.
PBB
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 November 2001 20:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5
Well, I think one could... But why?
Chris
--
Chris Scha
Oh yes..!
-Original Message-
From: Desmond Witherspoon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 November 2001 20:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hello All meet...the new guy
Fine line of warriors, the potato people
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL
~ndi
Ah, so the King of the Potato People has joined the list then...
PBB
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 November 2001 19:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hello All meet...the new guy
On Fri, 9 Nov 2001, Paul Bouzan wrote
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
