AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: [SPAM-FILT] - RE: NDR Question - Number of numbers in MIME From
exceeds maximum threshold
Make a distribution list that goes nowhere and put those email addresses
that you are getting spammed with there. Acts as a blackhole, eating up
junk and never gives
Hi everyone,
I was wondering , if there is a way I can stop NDR to senders and still have copies of
NDRs sent to a mailbox within same exchange organization ? I looked all KB but
couldn't find a way to do this. I'm running Exchange 2k-SP3.
Any help or direction in this regards will be greatly
Discussions
Subject: NDR Question
Hi everyone,
I was wondering , if there is a way I can stop NDR to senders and still have
copies of NDRs sent to a mailbox within same exchange organization ? I
looked all KB but couldn't find a way to do this. I'm running Exchange
2k-SP3.
Any help or direction
I'm sorry , I meant blocking SMTP sender's NDR . Essentially trying to block SPAMMERS
a response for those mails which bounce back to them because of a wrong e-mail address
spelling or mail bound for someone who no more exists with my company. As I wrote
we'll manually monitor those mails
Make a distribution list that goes nowhere and put those email addresses
that you are getting spammed with there. Acts as a blackhole, eating up
junk and never gives an NDR :)
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life
Thanks Bob.
Kishore
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 12:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: [SPAM-FILT] - RE: [SPAM-FILT] - RE: NDR Question - Number of numbers in MIME
From exceeds maximum threshold - Number of numbers
OL2K is being used for all msgs - fail or not.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 11:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help with NDR
What type of client is being used for the just
I would contact the sending email administrator and ask him if sees anything
on his end.
From: Sean Winters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Help with NDR
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:13:16 -0500
OL2K is being
I am working with a relatively new Ex2K build and have had two different
external contacts report intermittent NDR's. There is no PIX firewall in
place and ESMTP verbs have been disabled on our end.
The NDR is 4.4.1 Did not receive the expected protocol response.
Searching the usual sources has
: Sunday, September 28, 2003 5:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I am working with a relatively new Ex2K build and have had two different
external contacts report intermittent NDR's. There is no PIX firewall in
place and ESMTP verbs have been disabled on our end.
The NDR is 4.4.1 Did not receive
Nothing in my event log. The NDR is being generated on the sending end -
not on my server.
It also appears that not all messages are NDRing.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 5:40 PM
What type of client is being used for the just the ones that fail to you.
From: Sean Winters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Help with NDR
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:43:43 -0500
Nothing in my event log
I have a user who received the followiing error.
I can not determine why. Any help? odd thing is the mailboxes are all
located on mail02. So why was the msg directe dto mail03?
Thanks,
John Q Jr.
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
Received: from mail03.domain.ad ([10.10.220.27]) by
Hi,
Can someone explain the reason why this bounce back was created.
I have some ideas but a bounce back due to a 'forward' or 'between two
servers' is something I have never seen before.
The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on
PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Interesting Bounce Back/NDR
Hi,
Can someone explain the reason why this bounce back was created.
I have some ideas but a bounce back due to a 'forward' or 'between two
servers' is something I have never seen before.
The following
:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Interesting Bounce Back/NDR
Hi,
Can someone explain the reason why this bounce back was created.
I have some ideas but a bounce back due to a 'forward' or 'between two
servers' is something I have never seen before
We got this strange NDR. Does anyone know what it means? Been looking
it up but I can't find what the web bugs not accepted here message
means. This was generated by our external
You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance,
contact your system administrator
..
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 4:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange NDR
We got this strange NDR. Does anyone know
.
-Original Message-
From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 4:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange NDR
We got this strange NDR. Does anyone know what it means?
Been looking
it up but I can't find what the web bugs not accepted
..
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 4:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange NDR
We got this strange NDR. Does anyone know what
Hi all,
We're running Exchange 5.5 SP4 on an NT 4.0 SP6a box.
All internet email incoming and outgoing works fine except to
one site. This company can send us email, but if we reply or send email
we get an immediate NDR. The NDR says that The recipient
name is not recognized
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 7:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: NDR-The recipient name is not recognized
Hi all,
We're running Exchange 5.5 SP4 on an NT 4.0 SP6a box.
All internet email incoming and outgoing works fine except to
one site. This company
Those Russians again
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 8:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR-The recipient name is not recognized
Your system does not recognize - 'Galina Morozova (E-mail)' - as a
legitimate address
Hi Nate,
Thanks for replay
I can send e-mail from hotmail.com
But have problem send from my organization.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
Maybe she changed her hair color.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
One man's Spam is another man's UCE.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Couch, Nate
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 6:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR-The recipient name
For some reason my Exchange 2k server isn't sending NDR reports to external senders
when they try to send an e-mail with an attachment larger then what is allowed.
Instead of getting an NDR it just sits in the senders mail server until it times out a
couple of days later.
Could I be missing
A couple of days ago, I set up a SMTP connector on my E2K SP3
server so
that I can block external email access for some users. I
configured it
as per the MS document and all seemed to be working fine.
If that domain's mail server is doing reverse DNS look ups and your host
names don't
Hi all
A couple of days ago, I set up a SMTP connector on my E2K SP3 server so
that I can block external email access for some users. I configured it
as per the MS document and all seemed to be working fine.
Today though, no-one seems to be able to send mail to one particular
domain. We have a
Hi
Does any one has an idea or link which describes all the Exchange
NDR error and interpretation of it?
Regards
Santhosh.H
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
This message and any
Is this what you are looking for?
Q284204 - Delivery Status Notifications in Exchange 2000 Server
jeff e.
-Original Message-
From: Santhosh, H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 3:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange NDR
Hi
Does any one
Exchange 2000 (recently upgraded from 5.5) with Outlook 2000 clients
Originally, the HR spec would send out a meeting request. Acceptance or decline
replies would always generate a copy to HR sec.
Now, when that happens, the user would get an NDR saying that the HR sec name/address
of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: NDR when meeting accepted or declined
Exchange 2000 (recently
Nope, happens with no requests, too. I know what you mean, though. We had people
trying to reply to an email sent before the conversion and they'd get an ndr. That
was an easy fix, though.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto
]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR when meeting accepted or declined
Nope, happens with no requests, too. I know what you mean, though. We had people
trying to reply to an email sent before the conversion and they'd get an ndr. That
was an easy
delivery sizes to them
instead of actually deleting the mailbox when the staff member has left.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 10 December 2002 8:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange NDR
Received a strange NDR today. On an e-mail
: Strange NDR
Have a look for a hidden mailbox called hidden by jjones 12/6/02
It could be that whoever (or whatever if it is an automated job) bcc'ed
the email to this hidden mailbox, that appears to have restrictions on
the size of emails it can receive.
In the past I have hidden mailboxes
.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 12 December 2002 2:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange NDR
Guys, hidden by jjones 12/6/02 is what he typed in there I think to hide
the users display name. That isn't the actual text
Ah... little light goes on
A clear example of why obfuscating data when asking for help tends to cause
problems.
- Original Message -
From: Hutchins, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 9:24 AM
Subject: RE: Strange NDR
Actually what happens is that when I type in the e-mail address that
generated the NDR the alt-K it underlines it. The user with this address
exists at a different company with a different mail server of what type is
unknown to me. Here at my company there are very few users and I already
have
I'll assume 5.5; in Exchange Administrator View:Hidden Recipients.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 7:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange NDR
Actually what happens is that when I type in the e-mail address
Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange NDR
You could use logging to see if the user is sending such mails. Anyway it
will tell you if such mails are send from your network or at least via your
server.
Make sure your server is not an open relay.
If it was up to me I would check the queue's too. Spammers
So you are saying that when I view hidden recipients that the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] should be listed?
When I view hidden I have 2 ditro lists and some folders listed but none
that get this NDR. Actually there is nothing hidden that has an address in
the NDR or the original e-mail whatsoever.
I'll
Received a strange NDR today. On an e-mail sent to someone outside the
organization and the delivery failed. On the NDR it said
Your message
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Your telemanager.net e-report is ready
did not reach the following recipient(s):
hidden by jjones 12/6/02 lastname
If you type in the SMTP address in question and hit Alt-K, what does it
resolve to?
-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 3:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Received a strange NDR today. On an e-mail sent to someone
outside
If you are talking about outlook I type it in and Alt-k and it keeps it
the same, just underlines it. It is a good mailbox for the server as he
has been getting e-mails all day. I have left him a voicemail asking him
to send me an e-mail to confirm that address is not mistyped at all.
: RE: Strange NDR
If you are talking about outlook I type it in and Alt-k and it keeps it the
same, just underlines it. It is a good mailbox for the server as he has been
getting e-mails all day. I have left him a voicemail asking him to send me
an e-mail to confirm that address is not mistyped
... Anyone else, please do correct if I am just being a bit too paranoid
here.
On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 21:47, Jerry J. wrote:
Received a strange NDR today. On an e-mail sent to someone outside the
organization and the delivery failed. On the NDR it said
Your message
To: [EMAIL
message..
--B
At 13:47 09-12-2002 -0800, you wrote:
Received a strange NDR today. On an e-mail sent to someone outside the
organization and the delivery failed. On the NDR it said
Your message
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Your telemanager.net e-report is ready
did not reach
Seems to be the case. Thanks, Chris.
I'll alert the user to the happy news.
..sakes.
Tim.
x3683
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: A question of NDR
PFs don't do NDRs
:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Stop NDR
Create a list with no email address and put them on the list.
All email sent
to people belonging to the list will just disappear. It's
called creating a
blackhole.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
You know Vanessa as well?
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:DurkeeP;LanePowell.com]
Sent: 14 November 2002 00:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stop NDR
You need to deploy the old Black Hole DL trick. Make a Distribution List with no
members, and assign it the smtp
: A question of NDR
I would miss your reply, Andy. You're like the little baby buffalo nibbling around the
edges of the Exchange field. And I am the coyote who doesn't want to get sat on.
--
be - MOS
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13
By design I believe.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: A question of NDR
Scenario:
mailbox1 has user permission against mailbox2.
mailbox1 sends messages from within mailbox1
If you know all the answers, why are you asking us?
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: A question of NDR
oh come on, andy.. test the accuracy of your reply
send a message from
reply.
Tim.
x3683
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: A question of NDR
If you know all the answers, why are you asking us?
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault
Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: A question of NDR
Scenario:
mailbox1 has user permission against
13, 2002 10:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: A question of NDR
of course not.
and what's with the non-sequitor..?
in my first post on the issue I question what I believe is unusual behavior.
you claim the behavior is by design.
in my second post, I challenge your claim.
geez.. if you
: Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Testing NDR
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:12:40 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
---SNIP
--
Roger D
That is correct; the message is sent on behalf of mailbox2 (as seen in the
headers). The NDR goes the to _original_ sender. It makes sense:
Secretary has user permissions on her boss' inbox.
Secretary sends message on his behalf to other user(s).
Message bounces.
Who needs to know to resend
: A question of NDR
Scenario:
mailbox1 has user permission against mailbox2.
mailbox1 sends messages from within mailbox1 with mailbox2 in From field.
Any subsequent NDR's appear in Inbox of mailbox1 and not mailbox2.
qué arriba con eso
.
I checked the headers of some NDR's in the user's inbox and found no
instances of the address of the primary mailbox--just the address of the
secondary mailbox, again as one might expect.
I am really confused as to how the NDR found its way into the user's Inbox.
It's kinda like one would see
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: A question of NDR
perzaktly.. thanx roger. Your experienced is (I believe) the
normal and
expected behavior.
However, a user working
Thanks, Daniel. That's what I would expect (and what I experience in
testing) as well. The NDR will appear in the Inbox of secondary (mailbox2
in my example).
After a bit closer peek at the NDR header, it seems the headers of the NDR's
(within mailbox1 Inbox) list the 'return-path
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: A question of NDR
In Outlook2000 the reply to field defaults to the primary mailbox. You
can set that to whatever you want
From the This Just in Dept.:
The secondary mailbox is actually a PF against which the user has User
permission. The PF is configured correctly to receive inbound email.
return-path with the address of the origin mailbox appears in the header
of NDR(s) in the origin mailbox. So maybe we have
I have a number of employees that are no longer with our company and I
receive a large number of NDR's for mailing lists, SPAM, etc. that they
signed up for. What is the best way to eliminate these? I am running
Exch 2K. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: A question of NDR
Your attitude is apparently by design as well.
Like I said, if you send an email from within Outlook in the
manner you
described , I believe it works that way by design .
If I am wrong, so be it.
-Original Message
:53 PM
Subject: Stop NDR
I have a number of employees that are no longer with our company and I
receive a large number of NDR's for mailing lists, SPAM, etc. that they
signed up for. What is the best way to eliminate these? I am running
Exch 2K. Any help would be greatly appreciated
AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Stop NDR
I have a number of employees that are no longer with our company and I
receive a large number of NDR's for mailing lists, SPAM, etc. that they
signed up for. What is the best way to eliminate these? I am running
Exch 2K. Any help would be greatly
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:kwenger;centershift.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 11:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Stop NDR
I have a number of employees that are no longer with our company and I
receive a large number of NDR's for mailing lists, SPAM, etc. that they
signed up
If you aren't interested in resolving them, add their former SMTP
address as a secondary to a distribution group with no members. They
will disappear.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
] [mailto:kwenger;centershift.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Stop NDR
I have a number of employees that are no longer with our company and I
receive a large number of NDR's for mailing lists, SPAM, etc. that they
signed up for. What is the best way
Create A Distribution Group, add to it all the SMTP addresses of the users
that are no longer there, hide the group. Emails disappear. No NDR.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:kwenger;centershift.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
resend
Create A Distribution Group with no members, add to it all the SMTP
addresses of the users that are no longer there, hide the group. Emails
disappear. No NDR.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:kwenger;centershift.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 12:53 PM
Subject: Stop NDR
I have a number of employees that are no longer with our company and I
receive a large number of NDR's for mailing lists, SPAM, etc. that they
signed up for. What is the best way to eliminate these? I am running
Exch 2K. Any help would be greatly appreciated
PFs don't do NDRs. By design.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 11/13/2002 10:37 AM
Subject: RE: A question of NDR
From the This Just in Dept.:
The secondary mailbox is actually a PF against which the user has
User
permission. The PF is configured
the last bit before where it says IP name possibly forged and that
bothers me.
Tried MS KB but I don't seem to be able to give it the right keywords to force it to
cough up something I don't already know from the NDR
Any insight appreciated.
My server is Win2K Exch 2k with latest SP's
Their server
Outlook
Subject: Checking NDR
Hello All,
can you help me understand this?
At first glance it looks like my server got on someones black
list, but it isn't on any that I can find.
I have tried contacting this recipient from hotmail, and a
3rd party address, and from telnet, which
]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 10:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Checking NDR
Hello All,
can you help me understand this?
At first glance it looks like my server got on someones black
list, but it isn't on any that I can find.
I have tried contacting this recipient from
Cornerstonesurveying is doing rDNS; the FQDN your server is sending out does
not match the IP address in DNS.
-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:rpickens;pkce.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 9:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Checking NDR
Hello All,
can you
: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Checking NDR
It's saying that when it does a reverse DNS lookup of 64.45.174.203, it
expects to see the name that was presented in the HELO line, ie
msexpkce.pkce.com. However, it's seeing 64.45.174.203.cypresscom.net
[mailto:rpickens;pkce.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 10:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Checking NDR
Hello All,
can you help me understand this?
At first glance it looks like my server got on someones black list, but it isn't on
any that I can find.
I have tried contacting this recipient
Thanks Tony, but unfortunately that IMC has since been removed by a
colleague. This leaves the new one and one IMC at a remote site. The
external emails destined for the internal CR are still bouncing between the
MTAs until they NDR.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 10:49 PM
Subject: Custom Recipient NDR
Hi
We have Exchange 5.5 SP4 at mutlitple sites. A new server went in at our
main site with a new IMC that has a lower cost
Why happens if you increase the cost of the new IMC. (Wonder why you created
it there in the first place also?)
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 10:49 PM
Subject: Custom Recipient NDR
Hi
We have
Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 October 2002 18:09
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR From Field
The NDR should look something like:
---
The original message was received at Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:26:43 GMT
from localhost
The NDR should look something like:
---
The original message was received at Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:26:43 GMT
from localhost [127.0.0.1]
with id g9BEQhG06871
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(reason: 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL
The NDR should contain the original message to tell you to whom it was sent.
NDRs are required to have null sender addresses.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:StevensMD;oro.doe.gov]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 9:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR From Field
I have seen that and I assumed it was a bcc.
Dave Stevens
I have seen that and I assumed it was a bcc.
Dave Stevens
-IT Network Support-
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
865-576-8898
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 8:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR From
, 2002 5:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: custom NDR?
(digital camera sales surge noted)
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: custom NDR
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 2:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: custom NDR?
(blindfold sales surge noted)
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems
wow so that's what Ill miss be not be able to go to MEC.
Guess I'll just rent The Birdcage again..
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 8:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: custom NDR?
Just goes
way too much information for this time of day
--
From: Great Cthulhu Jones
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 07:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: custom NDR?
Just goes to show... there are two kinds of people
(digital camera sales surge noted)
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: custom NDR?
Thank you, thank you, I believe I'll be modelling said pink
David,
New procedure.
Check date. If date $TODAY, then DELETE message.
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, September 09, 2002 8:08 AM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: custom NDR?
Subject: RE: custom NDR
Got money ? Get MS to consult for u.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes
(IT)
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: custom NDR?
OK I'm looking for info, but in the meantime, in both/either 5.5
Got education? Learn the difference between u and you.
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 16:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: custom NDR?
Got money ? Get MS to consult for u.
-Original Message-
From
: Sunday, September 08, 2002 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: custom NDR?
Got education? Learn the difference between u and you.
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 16:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 4:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: custom NDR?
Brilliant. Verbally succinct, dead on target. Rapier wit.
I rate this answer at 5 pink sundresses. Well done, Gary. What are your
plans for following up on this critical success?
(:=
-Original Message
1 - 100 of 221 matches
Mail list logo
