Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Good day to everyone:
I am currently in the process of moving mailboxes from one MDB
on an Exchange 2003 server to another in an attempt to recover about 50%
whitespace.
When running the EXCHANGE TASK of MOVE MAILBOX I will sometimes
hi List,
Is there an easy way to set one user up as being able to send and receive
mail internally within the organisation only, and not to the internet?
Thanks
Graeme
--
Carbon credits are a bit like beating someone up on this side of the world
and sponsoring one of those poor starving
Transport Rule. Set those using the wizard in EMC, Org Config, Hub Transport.
If this is likely to be used for many people you may want to create a group and
apply the rule to the group - even if the group only has one member at this
time.
Simon.
--
Simon Butler
MVP: Exchange, MCSE
Amset IT
OK, stupid question, but what is the TCode TSO field in the registration
?
CFee
-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 17:30
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blackberry Webcasts
Just saw this come in and I know we have some
Thanks
Looks Good
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Simon Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Transport Rule. Set those using the wizard in EMC, Org Config, Hub
Transport.
If this is likely to be used for many people you may want to create a group
and apply the rule to the group - even if the
Thanks from here too. I'll pass it along to our Help Desk!
-Paul
-Original Message-
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 5:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts
And I'm one of them, thanks for sharing!
-Sam
My 30 Demo of
I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.
We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor. I
don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and
turn Journaling on on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.
Can
Journaling is a feature in Exch. that uses a mailbox to bcc every email that is
sent to or from or within your organization. So everything sent or received
goes to that mailbox. Then you set up an appliance, or a server...or on the
same server if you want to hit that mailbox every few minutes
Hi Paul,
My environment is almost exactly as yours.
We are a Non-Profit entity also.
We have been using GFI Mail Archiver with SQL Server 2005 which has
worked well, however some of the Exchange MVP's may state that
Journaling is not a good choice due to the fact it could cause high CPU
usage
You might think of sharing the name of the solution so as to gain input for
others that may have it or looked at it.
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving
Journaling is a feature in Exch.
It is MessageLabs.
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving
You might think of sharing the name of the solution so as to gain input
for others that may
Because journaling is turned on (plus a couple of reg hacks) every
message that passes through the MTA is archived. We use it here. While
it is great for compliance in terms of enforcing our retention policy,
it does not help to manage information store sizes as it is just taking
a copy of
Ditto on the Zantaz EAS but it's not cheap and may be overkill for smalller
shops that don't have compliance issues.
From: Doige, Clayton
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Tue Jun 10 09:23:42 2008
Subject: RE: email archiving
Because journaling is turned on
I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and email
retention.
Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They do
mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.
From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
To:
I am using SEA and am very happy with it.
Bob Fronk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving
I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and
Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?
From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving
I am using SEA and am very happy with it.
Bob Fronk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Eldridge,
Journaling is NOT enabled. I am using SEA's Direct Archive and see very
little (if any)impact on our Exchange server.
Bob Fronk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving
How does a hosted solution like Messagelabs archive internal email sent
tofrom employees?
From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving
It is MessageLabs.
SEA doesn't use Journaling.
Direct Archiving eliminates need for Journaling
SEA provides a unique Direct Archiving feature that enables archiving of
emails immediately after they are received. Direct Archiving is a
significant breakthrough in efficient email archiving which eliminates
the need
That's good to know. I've gotten approval for an archive system this
summer and this is certainly one of my choices.
Thanks
From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving
Journaling is NOT
How does that work?
I imagine you must need a TON of storage for archiving?
Sunbelt claims they can reduce your exchange database, but I don't see
how when they are collecting everything that passes through?
From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's magic as far as I can tell. Probably a factor of how efficient SQL seems
to be with storage. We use GFI and the storage is dramatically smaller than in
Exchange. I am sure Sunbelt delivers the same. I have about 100 gigs of active
stores on Exchange. When I put it up we did a full archive
Is the archive store on the same physical drives as the Exchange store?
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving
It's magic as far as I can tell.
Completely separate server. GFI pulls the messages from the Journaling mailbox,
with a glorified Outlook connection.
From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving
Is the archive store on the
I highly recommend it. Price is better than just about anything else.
Performance is good. Support has been excellent.
To answer a couple of the other questions posted:
RE: Storage: I have 900GB available for my archive. My Exchange store
is 250GB. Currently my archive is using about
That would be your 5 digit technical support services code (if you have T
Support with RIM) HTH
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Ph - 352-393-2741 x320
Fax - 352-393-2746
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, A+, N+
AKA the subscriber code.
Guess I should have mentioned those webcasts are for folks with support
contracts.
-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts
That would be
What kind of box is the SEA on? (Hardware/software?)
I assume it is a dedicate server that sits close to Exchange?
SQL server?
Thx
From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
Actually you can opt to use Journaling or not in SEA.
There are also environmental considerations to consider, Direct Archving
works well in smaller shops but for larger operations, we recommend
Journaling instead for overhead reasons.
Alex
Alex
Hello,
We have an Exchange 2003 SP2 Server running on Windows Server 2003 SP2.
We have an issue where no one can see the other user's calendar
information to determine if they can schedule a meeting at a particular
time. I have noticed that they Schedule+ Free/Busy folder is not showing
up
Y'mean they always display the whole list and scroll through it everytime? -
wow - guess I've never worked in that small an environment - we've always used
the enter a fragment of the name and either check names or simply send.
From: HELP_PC [mailto:[EMAIL
A quick Google search yielded this link:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/284200/en-us
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Chris Pohlschneider
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
We have an Exchange 2003 SP2 Server running on Windows Server 2003 SP2. We
have an issue where no one can see the
Actually I just went through that article and still unfortunately have
the same results. The article assumes that you have an old server name
listed in the SiteFolderServer section and the value that is in there is
the current server that we are running off of.
Hi-
This should be a quickie
I learned a while back (the hard way) the difference between disable and
remove for mailboxes. Luckily (or not) it was on my own mailbox.
Anyway...there is a user on our systems whose data got completely convoluted by
their own doingsso I DISABLED their
Sorry, if it wasn't clear this is exchange 2007.
Thanks
Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
Windows Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
517-884-5469
From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Removing
Windows 2003 / SQL 2005
It is a quad-dual core 2GHZ with 4GB Ram
It has a Raid 0+1 with 6 300GB SAS drives.
It is in the same rack as the Exchange box.
Bob Fronk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange
Is it dedicated to archiving?
Meaning it is only running Sunbelt's Exchange Archiver?
From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving
Windows 2003 / SQL
Yes.
Bob Fronk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving
Is it dedicated to archiving?
Meaning it is only running Sunbelt's Exchange Archiver?
Nice!
Thanks for the info... I need to start investigating archiving as well.
-Dave
From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving
Yes.
Bob Fronk
[EMAIL
Alex what is the cutoff for a small shop? 250, 500 mailboxes?
From: Alex Eckelberry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving
Actually you can opt to use Journaling or not in SEA.
There are also
Although I am sure it is over kill for what it does. I could probably
run something else on it, but I rather have it dedicated.
I
Bob Fronk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
Can you connect it to another user object and then delete? You
obviously can't reconnect it to the orignal user.
Michelle Weaver
System Administrator - Materials Research Institute
Pennsylvania State University
-Original Message-
From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
OK, I REALLY want to keep my Blackberry Demo. (Curve/8330).
Do I really have to pay Sprint the $45 Vision/Blackberry monthly fee to
get data to this device? That might be a deal breaker. My voice plan
isn't even that much.
I paid $10 a month for my Treo data package :(
Very off topic, I
$45 seems really high. Does sprint offer different data packages? I.e
BIS vs. BES vs. data only for web traffic?
-Original Message-
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: WAS: Blackberry Webcasts
OK, I
Then you will probably need to use GUIDGen to rebuild your system
folders, as described in KB822444. Be sure you understand the impact -
it's more than just the Free/Busy folder, it's at least the Org Forms
library and Offline Address Books as well.
From:
How many Exchange servers, and how widely separated are they?
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Journaling is NOT enabled. I am using SEA's Direct Archive and see very
little (if any)impact on our Exchange server.
Bob Fronk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:
Just one Exchange server. (However I do have a replicate server using
DoubleTake at another site)
Bob Fronk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 1:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: email archiving
You don't need Vision. You just need the BB Enterprise plan and your phone.
But it's still going to run you about $40 a month for the BB data plan.
Sprint also has that $99 a month all you can eat plan and it includes
Blackberry (unlike the other carriers).
-Original Message-
From: Sam
Ah.
I'm looking at an archiving solution to take care of three servers,
one each in the UK, US and Australia. That'lll prove interesting.
We're currently using MJ to get all mail to a mailbox here, and
(YUCK!) manually archiving to PSTs. It's painful, sinful, and a
heinous waste of time and
You don't need Vision. You just need the BB Enterprise plan and your phone.
But it's still going to run you about $40 a month for the BB data plan.
Sprint also has that $99 a month all you can eat plan and it includes
Blackberry (unlike the other carriers).
-Original Message-
From: Sam
I can not reconnect it because it is not listed in the disconnected mailboxes
list, which is the original issue. :)
Thanks
Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
Windows Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
517-884-5469
-Original Message-
From: Michelle Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Vision, Blackberry Data Plan, whatever it's called. $40 is a rip off.
If I ditch the BES server, and use the outlook sync tool or BIS, do I
still need to pay the $40 a month? Is there a non-enterprise data plan?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looked at them for filtering, but the getting a hold of a person to deal with
was a nightmare. Leave a message call backs and online support, total drag.
Only available business hours..etc
Helped me sell a more expensive solution to management, with great support
(using Proofpoint
Looking at it now. Using Trend and want to get away from supporting a
box. Hesitant to move the MX. Users like what they have but backscatter
is a problem and Google claims to have a better solution for less then
the cost of Trend. Tough decision.
From: Roger
Cool.
As for the unlimited, I'm on a shared business account, no can do.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts
You don't need Vision. You just need the
Anybody using Google's Postini filtering system ahead of your Exchange
box? The pricing per mailbox seems radically low...
http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/security/compare.html
Roger Wright
Network Administrator
727.572.7076 x388
~ Ninja Email
I'd be very leary about anything Google is selling. They are data miners at
the core. nuf said?
- Original Message -
From: Roger Wright
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:29 AM
Subject: Google Message Filtering/Security
Anybody using Google's
If I am not mistaken... SEA will do that.
Bob Fronk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: email archiving
Ah.
I'm looking at an archiving solution to take
Another interesting tidbit is when I use get-mailboxstatistics I can see all 3
of this guys mailboxes (only one of them being the one that is actually in use,
the other 2 were 'disabled') however when I use get-mailbox it only shows the
one that is currently enabled and in use.
Ehren J.
Hmmm, I get the impression that Bob likes SEA
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I am not mistaken... SEA will do that.
Bob Fronk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10,
SEA = Shook in his underwear.
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: email archiving
Hmmm, I get the impression that Bob likes SEA
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:19
I get the impression that Bob like SEA men :) j/k
From: Tom Strader - NCBPAC Systems Administrator
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving
SEA = Shook in his underwear.
E, no
SEA = Sherry E. Abercrombie (really, those are my initials)
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Tom Strader - NCBPAC Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SEA = Shook in his underwear.
--
*From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this where we hum Bob and Sherry, sitting in a tree... ?
Seriously, though, almost all the Archive vendors will work in a
geographically disparate solution set... it's just a question of how,
and how well...
The archiving topic keeps coming up, and it seems most people are
missing the
Yes, that would be very useful and greatly appreciated!
From: Bingham, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 4:42 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving
Is this where we hum Bob and Sherry, sitting in a
Well, I for one would surely benefit from it, and appreciate the
offer. I look forward to it.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Bingham, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this where we hum Bob and Sherry, sitting in a tree… ?
Seriously, though, almost all the Archive vendors will work in a
There is no need to use adsiedit to solve this problem.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Greg Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 7:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricted GAL
If i
Dave Goldman released updated guidance for doing address list segmentation
in Exchange 2007 and 2003. You should be able to google on that phrase at
site:*.microsoft.com and find the updated white paper.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
Maybe the new article is different but i seem to remember modifying some DN
with adsiedit. Either way, it's still a PITA to do and maintain so id agree
with the other sentiments.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 11 June 2008 7:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Just permissions.
http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Shared-Hosting-Exchange-2003-Part2.h
tml
From: Greg Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricted GAL
Maybe the new article is different but i seem to
We have customers that are using direct archiving for a little more than
100 mailboxes without problems, but since the bottleneck is the Exchange
Server, we do not suggest direct archiving for more than 50 mailboxes.
Instead we prefer setting up jobs that run every couple of hours, which
has the
Hey, be nice to customers of Sunbelt! They pay for this list! ;-)
Alex
From: Kent, Larry CTR USA IMCOM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving
I get the impression that Bob
You could conceivably modify the msExchQueryBaseDN using ADSIEdit, but I
would use ADmodify as a much safer tool.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Greg Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:59 PM
To:
Any indication of the error in the Event Logs?
\\Steve//
From: Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Error when moving mailboxes (UNCLASSIFIED)
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
I am running Direct Archive with over 150 with no issues on the Exchange
side.
Bob Fronk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Alex Eckelberry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving
Have you tried running clean-mailboxdatabase against that particular mdb?
that should check those mailboxes again and mark those that are disconnected
as such.
-alex
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Ehren Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Another interesting tidbit is when I use
76 matches
Mail list logo
