atency but
it shouldn't matter too much
-Original Message-
From: Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 6:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: SATELLITE DSL WITH
EXCHANGE SMTP?
We are in Ventura
County, CA and just found out
from the ISP that
s may complain about the terminology you are using,
since DSL is a connection method and so is satellite so I'm presuming you are
talking about satellite for high speed connectivity. There will be latency but
it shouldn't matter too much
-Original Message-
From: Michael
[mailto:[
to deal with frame relay where
100 ms was just wonderful, and anything less than 150 ms was quite acceptable.
We were running Citrix traffic across the frame so we would get
complaints when latency was bad, usually >200 ms.
Carl
-Original Message-
From: Michael
[ma
here on
the Listserver we are very close to signing off on this wireless broadband
connection… Michael J
-Original Message-
From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 2:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange
Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SATELLITE DSL WITH
EXCHANGE SMTP
Title: Message
Their least expensive package (SkyPipeline) comes with symmetrical 256kb, I am not
familiar with the “60KB” you mentioned here….
-Original Message-
From: Michael Reid
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 11:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange
Admin
% correct. We are dealing with a service using “terrestrial RF
broadband” and *NOT*
satellite… Michael
BTW. Since this original
post was made we have even a second location that cannot be provisioned for DSL
for similar D-SLAM reasons. If this
service works out well in location “A”, then
I don't think this works anymore. Must have been temporary or we beat it up :)
On Thursday, May 13, 2010, Jason Gurtz wrote:
> I just discovered a nice service.
>
> Send an email to check-a...@verifier.port25.com and you will get back a
> very detailed report of various things that relate to your
use as an example?
Thanks. Michael
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
We are in Ventura County,
CA and just found out from the ISP that
slots on the D-SLAM may not be available for our IDSL connection. How well does satellite DSL weigh in with
SMTP mail on an Exchange Server environment? Thanks. Michael
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt
view it from there.
HELP
Michael Brubaker
Vice President Tel: (321) 631-8073 Fax: (321) 632-8769 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IICwww.iictel.com <http://www.iictel.com/>
I
ice (724) 830-5966 Fax (724) 853-3600
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Brubaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 9:22 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Forwarding
with and with out ssl
Michael D.
PlotskerTechnology ConsultantKJ Technology Consulting, Inc.T.
718-575-1595C. 917-406-4215F. 212-202-5013mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Is there any way to force all messages to be html? When I start a
message in outlook, it is html, but when I reply or forward, it is not.
I am using Exch2k SP2 and Outlook 2000 SR-1
Michael Brubaker
Vice President Tel: (321) 631-8073 Fax
Neither did Antigen until we blocked all.scr's.
Mike Johnson
GRFLLP
-Original Message-
From: Karen Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm
We just got this one. Nort
Depends on when you have Antigen set up to check for an automatic update and
which anti-virus engines you are running.
We were lucky and got an automatic update which covered us about 15 minutes
before we started getting hit.
Bruce
-Original Message-
From: Michael Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL
Can someone please tell me the procedure for doing this with Exchange2k?
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Khoi Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: quick question on multiple mail box
Hi all,
As Jim,
ession for virtual machine
IIC-EXCHANGE. The error number is 0xc007052e.
Help please, I am pulling my hair out.
________
Michael Brubaker
Vice President Tel: (321) 631-8073 Fax: (321) 632-8769 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
LOL!!!
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 4:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Off topic Win 2k issue.
You're always showing off your tool.
-Original Message-
From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:[EM
Is there a way of blocking an entire domain from connecting to IMC?
Michael Duebner
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
your help!
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Milton R. Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 8:59
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking domain via IMC
Sure is.. What version of Exchange you gotz? Any firewall in the middle?
Firewalls are just
"SMTP alias is then added to 'ex-employee' mailbox list of aliases for
stray emails"
Is there a link someone could provide for doing this with Exchange 2000?
Michael David
IT Coordinator
Tennex Industries, Inc
248-393-0252x3517
-Original Message-
From: Lefkov
We are considering the purchase of FACSys as an integrated fax solution for
exchange. The question that comes to mind is how does FACSys and deal with
DID applications. Anyone that has experience on this, please share it with
the rest of us. Thank you.
Regards,
Michael Duebner
Operations
I am not sure why the public folder is important.
We use Win2K, Exchange2K with Active Directory. I have then created an
OU to store the external contacts. When I add contacts to the OU, they
automatically show up in the Global Address Book which is available by
Outlook or OWA.
hth
-Origi
ernal Corporate Contact List Exchange 2000
So you are actually adding these users to AD then or are you somehow
just
adding email addresses to the OU?
Mike Carlson
http://www.domitianx.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Michael Morisoli
Sorry about the OT, but does anybody have any recommendations
for an out-bound modem pooling solutions (Yuck, I hate modems)
I have a large group of users that need to dial us using pcAny to remote clients to provide tech-support.
Thanks.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunb
Hello All,
Just wondering if anyone can let me know how to propagate
permissions on a public folder in Exchange 2000? I have one public folder
with 80+ sub-folders and I'm not looking forward to the prospect of
changing permissions on each one individually.
any help would be greatly
What is the consensus, is it safe
to installed SP2 for Exch2k?
Thanks…
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Title: Message
Correct. An Exchange CAL is always needed, regardless of where or how
(OWA or mail client) you access your mailbox; an NT CAL is
not.
-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence
Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday,
I have an interesting problem that just started last night
with our OWA users.
We have 3 Win2K, sp2 servers connected via VPN’s, each with Exchange 2K, sp1 and some users on
each server.
All of the sudden last night and again today, users on server1
can login to the domain and get t
Title: RE: License Question
>They need an NT CAL if they are in Per Server mode. Or if it is the only NT Server in the domain. Hard to think of this
>actually happening in any kind of an environment...
Happens in my environment. :-)
My NT server is used ONLY as an Exchange server (al
Title: RE: OWA usage
> If they don't have a mailbox, they cant get in.
> Its as simple as that.
I think his question is "How does I stop the folks who *do* have a mailbox, but for whom I don't have an OWA CAL? Other than trusting them not to?".
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ropia
Title: RE: OWA usage
> I think you have things misunderstood or didn't explain them
> correctly.
>
> You need a CAL for every person that is accessing the
> Exchange server. That
> CAL encompasses, regular old connections, POP, IMAP, or OWA.
Not every person; every computer. If I access a
Title: RE: Migration from lotus notes
> Martin,
> Thanks for your reply! Quitting was the first thing that ran
> through my mind however I simply can't afford it with current market situation.
Yeah, the mortgage company doesn't like it when you can't make payments for 2-3 months, while you
Title: Inbox with the wrong name
Ok here is one for you guy's
Exchange 5.5 sp4
NT 4.0 sp6a
outlook 98
One of my users (not one of the worst) has managed to rename his inbox on the exchange client.
It now says "Group Meeting Schedule" something he did for a different folder.
Call me a duc
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Inbox
with the wrong name
I
think you have to use the old Exchange client to change
it.
-Original Message-From: Michael Ponto
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 1:24
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject
There
are a lot better faster and cheaper servers around that don't have a name brand.
We used to shop around until we found a dealer that did white boxes. These are
genuine Intel Boxes that cost a hell of a lot less. My last server we got 2
weeks ago was a 4U box with quad Xeon 700's with
001 6:37 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
CDW
Just
post it. I too used a whitebox for my last server, from www.utron.com. No stupid !x.cfg
files. Not much support either though.
-Original Message-From: Michael Belli
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tu
Title: RE: Attachments lost and not
I have been watching this with great interest.
We are having the same issues here.
We are using Outlook 98.
All else is the same.
Does anybody have a solution to any of this?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Starkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
Original Message-From: Michael Ponto
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 23 August 2001
19:10To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Attachments lost and not
I have been watching this with great interest.
We are having the same issues here. We are using Outlook 98. All e
I get
the same problem every now and then. Usually the user will just keep sending the
mail until it does finally resolve. I think it is a DNS or MX error that
occurs.
-Original Message-From: Micciche Robert
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, August 27,
2001 12:52 PMTo:
Title: Message
Same
here. We used Arc 6.61 and decided to dump it for Ultrbac. They even gave us a
discount for dumping Arcserver.
Mike
Johnson
Network Dude
GRF,LLP
-Original Message-From: Stephen J. Norton
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 7:04
AMTo
Title: Message
LOL!!!
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001
7:08 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
ArcServe2000
So,
you're clear then? No ArcServeIT.
It
doesn't matter that they paid NBC to
I am getting heaps of email to this account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> . Today I received a Spam email sent to the
about 25 other [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s> . I'm
concerned that I maybe relaying this Spam. Anyone have any ideas
ed..." you are good to go.
Hope that helps.
-Original Message-
From: Michael David [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: I'm concerned with this
I am getting heaps of email to this ac
Ok I was wrong I can use those commands and I get a 250 OK - Recipient
(yes I know I shouldn't say that in an open forum) what do I do now?
-Mike
-Original Message-
From: Michael David
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7696>
-Original Message-
From: Michael David [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: I'm concerned with this (Answer)
Ok I was wrong I can use t
You are very correct. I have been avoiding messing (learning) with this
box (only Linux I have) since the local fee based Linux consultant
installed it. Luckily I have never had trouble with it. I was bored
today so I started looking through the NDRs and noticed all the
potts@. records. Th
from that relay machine. How significant is
opening the firewall and exposing the interior network to OWA? Can
someone point me to pro/con security information on OWA so I can present
it as a viable solution to remote mail.
Thanks,
Michael David
IT Coordinator
Tennex Industries, Inc
248-393
I'm having a problem achieving my own email box. I get the following
error:
Error while archiving folder "Computer" in store "Mailbox - Michael
David". Some items could not be copied. They were either moved or
deleted, or access was denied.
I check permissions on the s
Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Archieve Error
Let me guess. Your mailbox is massive? Lots of items?
I see this a lot in that situation.
-Original Message-
From: Michael David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 11:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject
ed e-mails. I tracked
them down and deleted them and archiving worked fine ever since.
Greg
-Original Message-----
From: Michael David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 2:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Archieve Error
I'm having a problem a
ACK! http://www.drewncapris.net
Murphy's Technology Law #17: A computer makes as many mistakes in two
seconds as 20 men working 20 years make.
-Original Message-
From: Michael David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 2:25 PM
To: MS-Exchan
Any recomendations for a stellar backup program that works with exchange
2k?
Michael Brubaker
Vice President Tel: (321) 631-8073 Fax: (321) 632-8769 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IICwww.iictel.com
Can you turn off the feature that finds fax numbers automatically when
you type a name in the to field? It gets to be annoying.
Michael Brubaker
Vice President Tel: (321) 631-8073 Fax: (321) 632-8769 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
Who makes antigen?
Michael Brubaker
Vice President Tel: (321) 631-8073 Fax: (321) 632-8769 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IICwww.iictel.com <http://www.iictel.com/>
I
What is the pricetag on antigen?
Michael Brubaker
Vice President Tel: (321) 631-8073 Fax: (321) 632-8769 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IICwww.iictel.com <http://www.i
http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q253503
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 12:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Disappearing Emails
Make sure their View is set to "Messages"
Title: Moving directory between Orgs
I need to move mailboxes and DLs between two exchange server 5.5 organizations. I was wondering if anyone that has done this before can give me some direction. I am leaning towards exporting out one organization's directory and importing it into my organi
?
Michael Brubaker
Vice President Tel: (321) 631-8073 Fax: (321) 632-8769 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IICwww.iictel.com <http://www.iictel.com/>
International InterConnect
297
When a text search is performed on my Exchange 2000 server any relevant
text in mailboxes is also listed via drive M. Double clicking launches
Outlook Express revealing the entire message. This is a security risk so
how do I lock it down. I have checked permissions on the mailboxes,
Administrators
Title: Message
KM,
We're
in the process of planning our migration to W2k and E2k also. You mention a book
in your reply. Can I have the name?
Mike
Johnson
Network Dude
GRFLLP
-Original Message-From: Kevin Miller
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 18,
2001 12:
This is a bit off the wall, but here goes.
Recently I replaced an older Linux + SendMail
server that died with an Exchange 2000 server. This server is used primarily as a relay
host for a web farm we have. The
problem has to do with malformed from addresses. For some reason, there
ange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Relay - from: address
issue
don't think that's
possible Michele...
Michael - In 5.5 there
are a whole set of new P2 and P1 resolve settings you can add into the
registry(Q174755). In Exchange 2000 check out Q288635.
x27;s okay Michael... from
the last response sent.. Michele isn't getting it..
-Rick
-Original Message-----
From: Michael Morisoli
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Relay - from: address
issue
The probl
-
-Original Message-
From: Rick Ward - HQ
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 4:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Relay - from: address
issue
It's okay Michael... from
the last response sent.. Michele isn't
I need to come up with a plan to encrypt exchange
mail. I am currently using key management server for internal encryption. now I
need to extend this to external email using PKI. does anyone know what I
need?
Michael D. PlotskerTechnology ConsultantKJ
Technology Consulting, Inc.Tel
Title: RE: Outlook/Exchange
> We have a developer who had written a program that runs in
> UNIX (Of which I know nothing about) to monitor specific things on our imaging
> system and page one of us fortunate systems folks for specific errors on
> the system. He also wants to provide us with
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain
> in 2k right click my computer connect to another computer
> then click sessions
Hmmm. In my Win2K Pro, I have no option "Connect to another computer", when I right click on My Computer, from the desktop.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-s
Anyone using the new Trend SMTP Interscan Viruswall?
Got a problem hope anyone can help with...
Im having this problem with the new version 5.01. It has this HOP count
setting that it trys to check before sending any internet bound email how
many HOPs it will take to deliver the message. T
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain
AH. I
was wondering where the "Connect" was; I wasn't seeing it before. Got it now.
Thanks.
--
----
Michael Leone, Systems Administrator
Philadelphia Contributionship
210 S. 4th
exchanges
service?
Michael
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:33 AM
Subject: RE: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k
> Exc
next. I've installed 5.5 but how do I
really use it, such as getting OWA to work, having a user connect from
outside, etc. Thanks.
Always learning
Michael
- Original Message -
From: "Benjamin Winzenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <
Title: Message
Tehe, it took me a second...hehe...
- Original Message -
From:
Martin Blackstone
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 7:24
PM
Subject: RE: OWA usage
Hey, I don't
think we are interested in what you are into.
your first
time, it get annoying when you can't make it go vroom.
Michael
The page cannot be displayed
- Original Message -
From: "Fred Valdez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 24
No I didn't, it didn't ask for my CD for W2K so I didn't bother. Should I?
Michael
- Original Message -
From: "Fred Valdez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 8:43 PM
Sub
Isn't the Res Kit a "pay to play" deal
?
http://www.microsoft.com/mspress/books/4355.asp
Not
all of them; you can download most of the Win2K Resource Kit programs, I
believe.
- Original Message -
From:
Karen Palmer
To: MS-Exchange Admi
Title: RE: 5.5 resource kit
> AFAIK there is no separate RK for Exchange. It's part of the
> Back Office Resource Kit.
And is that available as an online download?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Karen Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 9:13 AM
> T
Title: RE: 5.5 resource kit
> From: Schart, Vlastimil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q160270
Which says ...
The BackOffice Resource Kit Part One (BORK 1), which includes the Microsoft Exchange Server 4.0 Resource Kit...
List Char
Win 98 SE, O2k, all patched and updated, on IBM T20 laptops. We have some
users who are experiencing a strange problem. When they receive email, the
are getting a "Outlook has preformed a illegal operation, >>close or
ignore", choose ignore and the laptop freezes and needs to reboot, close an
try to connect to it from the 2K domain, you are prompted for a username and
password. Nothing I enter creates the connection.
What am I missing?
Michael
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
The NT domain trusts the W2K domain. not the other way around.
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 3:13
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Two domains one exchange server
Which way round is the trust
this? Please help keep an Exchange
admin from learning Lotus.
Michael David
IS Coordinator
Mahle-Tennex R&D North America
phone: 248-393-0252x3517
fax: 248-393-0636
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
Title: RE: Antigen filter "*.*.*" - worthwhile?
> We use this filter and the only downside is that many people
> choose to "hide extensions of well-known file types" on their pc's. Thus,
They don't "choose" to hide; it's the default, and most people don't know that it's a stupid default a
ose" that
setting. In my experience, it's almost never a "choice". Which is why I
commented only on that *1* portion of your post, and not on how to deal with it
afterwards.
--
----
Michael Leone, Systems Administrator
Ph
Title: RE: Recalled messages
> A message sent out was recalled. The message came
> back, but some people still got the message, and some
> did not.
You can't recall a message that's been read already, I don't believe. Was that the case here?
>
> What could cause this to happen? At least
Has anyone had any experience with this product?
Its supposed to be a good fit for MS Small Business Server 2000.
Any comments appreciated
Michael Jacob
PO Box 992 Gawler SA 5118
139a Murray Street Gawler SA 5118
Ph (08) 8522 2027 Fax (08) 8523 1771
Mobile 0418 840005
List Charter and FAQ
Title: Message
Also, why on earth would you have support issues? I don't support
nonbusiness related functions.
IM can also be used
for business purposes. I've had online response help from Cisco in a private
chat.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-soft
Title: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact
>but of course, every one of those mails is essential, and referred back to on a daily basis!!
More likely, they're kept around, in case it needs to be presented in court as evidence (See: Gates, Bill; North, Oliver)
List Charter and
Title: RE: My recent $*#($#@($&#
> Chimay or nothing
Leffe Brown. Or Blonde.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Title: RE: My recent $*#($#@($&#
Actually, real men drink whatever they please, and damn anyone else's
opinions! :-)
--
----
Michael Leone, Systems Administrator
Philadelphia Contributionship
210 S. 4th Street, Philadelphia, P
,
Michael Dopps
Email Administrator
Baylor Health Care System
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Title: RE: Exchange Server in a Cable Environment
> Depending on your location - my experience is with @home purchased by
> Comcast (bad to worse), you lose the static IP in favor of
> their DHCP. In order to get a static, you pay triple for the same services.
> Rumor mill for Comcast (sux)
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 8:11
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Exchange
Server in a Cable Environment
I have SBC DSL for business...They have a
great deal of 79.99/month for 5 static IP'
s). What about those system-created accounts?
--
----
Michael Leone, Systems Administrator
Philadelphia Contributionship
210 S. 4th Street, Philadelphia, PA
19106
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
V: 215-627-1752 x1282
F: 215-627-5354
-Origi
Title: Counting mailboxes
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002
11:27 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Counting mailboxes
Exchange is not licensed by mailbox.
It is licenesed by the number of us
hand?
--
Michael Leone, Systems Administrator
Philadelphia Contributionship
210 S. 4th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
V: 215-627-1752 x1282
F: 215-627-5354
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Title: Counting mailboxes
-Original Message-From: Drewski
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002
11:48 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Counting mailboxes
It's
easier to delete the few than count the many.
However, I believe that Bill
cessing via OWA from offsite, as well as
locally?
-Original Message-----From: Leone, Michael
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 21,
2002 8:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Counting mailboxes
-Original Message-From
Title: Message
Huh. I
would use a PST on a local drive for non-work related mails, and not take up
space in the Exchange server.
And if
you've got both a wife && girlfriend, you've got more important issues
to worry about than Exchange licenses! :-)
-Original Message-From: Rop
Title: Message
I'm still
not sold on this OWA licensing thing
I'm calling MS now, and hope they
know what they're talking about. I'll post back what they tell
me.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
1 - 100 of 1825 matches
Mail list logo
