Thanks for the hints, we had to run mfcmapi and delete some corrupted rules
which fixed the issue.
From: Ralph Smith [mailto:m...@gatewayindustries.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 5:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules on e2k3 ent
We had an employee who, every time
-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules on e2k3 ent
This is usually due to delegate permissions.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Lists - Level Five [mailto:li...@levelfive.us]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 3:03 PM
To
This is usually due to delegate permissions.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Lists - Level Five [mailto:li...@levelfive.us]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 3:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Rules on e2k3 ent
I have a client
l B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 4:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules Stop Processing
Mostly because I followed Google/Postini's directions for
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules Stop Processing
Why aren't you using a transport rule?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011
Why aren't you using a transport rule?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 8:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Rules Stop Processing
Twice no
Hmm... thanks John. Trying to find that setting... No luck so far.
From: John C Owen [mailto:jo...@efotobooth.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 5:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules firing only once... any thoughts?
I believe, like in the OOO, that you can set the rule
I believe, like in the OOO, that you can set the rule to reply to every
message versus only one message per sender per day
From: Evan Brastow [mailto:ebras...@automatedemblem.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 5:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Rules firing only once... any thou
ailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 1:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules & Delegates in Exchange 2003 to Exchange Migration
2010
Are all of the working rules visible in OWA? Or all of the broken rules?
Ever used mfcmapi? You know rules are associated m
://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Brad Metzler [mailto:bmetz...@cu-portland.edu]
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 4:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules & Delegates in Exchange 2003 to Exchange Migration 2010
We did have some issues with users not having the inheritance set which
prevents them from u
r one of the users, out of a list of 5 rules, only 2 stopped
working...
Brad
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 12:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules & Delegates in Exchange 2003 to Exchange Migration
2010
That...
That...shouldn't happen.
I might suggest you see if a given user and/or mailbox has been blocked from
permission inheritance. That's the only item that pops to mind that would cause
that without major mumbo jumbo.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchang
[amalgamated reply]
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Michael B. Smith
wrote:
> Exchange is a beast of many parts, and adding functionality on
> the OSS side by adding programs is not precisely comparing apples-to-apples.
Oh, don't get me wrong, I wasn't trying to suggest that this one
detail m
'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 7:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Rules
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Michael B. Smith
wrote:
> No. IMAP only recogniz
tp://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael
I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 5:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Rules
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at
in
a specific folder. It totally sucks doing it per user, but if you script new
user creation, it makes it doable.
-troy
From: KevinM [kev...@wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 8:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules
That is nice for
...@lefkovics.net]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 3:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules
Defining a destination folder for a specific email is trivial in Sendmail,
Postfix, Zimbra, Procmail, and so on (ok, not trivial, but easier than writing
a transport agent or something) and is fairly
, February 06, 2009 2:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules
I simply don't see how moving to sendmail or whatever allows you to define
the DESTINATION FOLDER of a particular email. That seems very much a client
function to me than a (normal) server function.
Regards,
Mich
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Michael B. Smith
wrote:
> I simply don't see how moving to sendmail or whatever allows you to define
> the DESTINATION FOLDER of a particular email.
Well, since you ask: With Sendmail/Postfix and procmail, I would
have just put the following in /etc/procmailrc an
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Campbell, Rob
wrote:
> Who wouldn't be thrilled at the prospect of wading into that explosion at
> a punctuation factory that is referred to in polite company a
> "sendmail rulesets"?
I'm pleased to consider sendmail.cf "object code", like a .EXE file.
The .mc mac
http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael
I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:will...@lefkovics.net]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 2:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules
Because your task seems easier to do on cert
-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Rules
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 10:53 AM, KevinM wrote:
> And how would a different email server help me make a rule for all of the
> users?
Heh, I know adding server-wide rules is trivial with Sendmail and
procmail on a *nix box. But that might be rather
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 10:53 AM, KevinM wrote:
> And how would a different email server help me make a rule for all of the
> users?
Heh, I know adding server-wide rules is trivial with Sendmail and
procmail on a *nix box. But that might be rather more than you want
to bite off :-)
-- Ben
nt: Friday, February 06, 2009 7:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules
And how would a different email server help me make a rule for all of the
users?
From: will...@lefkovics.net [mailto:will...@lefkovics.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 9:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issu
And how would a different email server help me make a rule for all of the users?
From: will...@lefkovics.net [mailto:will...@lefkovics.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 9:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules
Well, Pine can use IMAP and OWA Lite does see the Junk Mail folder
mmas.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 7:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules
Message with X-Spam in the header move to folder spam
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 1:43 PM
To: MS-Exchan
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:20 PM, will...@lefkovics.net
wrote:
> For IMAP clients, this should work fine.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:36 PM, KevinM wrote:
> What about for pine clients...
As William noted, Pine does IMAP just fine. It was one of the early
IMAP clients. 1991, I believe.
If t
unresolved recipients to that mail server where more
granular message control can be exercised.
From: "KevinM"
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 9:10 PM
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues"
Subject: RE: Rules
What about for pine cl
What about for pine clients = ] or chrome clients getting owa lite?
From: will...@lefkovics.net [mailto:will...@lefkovics.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 8:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules
There is no option to move to a specific folder. You'd have to depe
min Issues"
Subject: RE: Rules
I did not see any server side rules that would move to a folder. Are you
thinking that I make the rule raise the SCL to the MAX if X is in the header..
that sounds like a good idea.. will it work?
From: will...@lefkovics.net [mailto:will...@lefkovics.net]
Se
:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules
Isn't there a transport rule condition "when a message header contains specific
words"?
You could set the SCL based on the presence of X-Spam and have it moved to junk
email server side.
From:
al Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 7:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Rules
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Michael B. Smith
wrote:
> No. IMAP only recognizes subfolders of INBOX. (At least that's true for
> IMAP
05, 2009 4:39 PM
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues"
Subject: RE: Rules
Message with X-Spam in the header move to folder spam
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 1:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Michael B. Smith
wrote:
> No. IMAP only recognizes subfolders of INBOX. (At least that's true for
> IMAPrev1 which is what Exchange supports.)
I'm sorry, but I believe you are completely wrong on this one. :)
I've used plenty of old Unix IMAP servers, with an
Message with X-Spam in the header move to folder spam
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 1:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules
Well, I appreciate that - but I was trying to help you NOW
mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 2:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules
I am already trying to get your hired on as a contractor.. I put your name
in all of the right bucket and kicked all of the right people into gear..
-Original Message-
From:
vegas/index.php
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 4:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Rules
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 2:16 PM, KevinM wrote:
> makes spam with X-Spam-bla
> I want to move all of the messages to a
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 2:16 PM, KevinM wrote:
> makes spam with X-Spam-bla
> I want to move all of the messages to a folder For all users.
> How can I do this with the least effort = ]
For least sysadmin effort over time, your best bet is to prolly to
use some kind of server-wide mail filter sy
g]
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 14:44
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Rules
>
> There are some who use Procmail too.. The number of clients at this
> company is shocking... They smash tiny things for a living..
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jaso
> -Original Message-
> From: KevinM [mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org]
> Subject: RE: Rules
>
> They smash tiny things for a living..
So that's what happened to Shook!
Webster
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www
There are some who use Procmail too.. The number of clients at this company is
shocking... They smash tiny things for a living..
-Original Message-
From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:jasongu...@npumail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 11:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules
> Customer has a heap of "scientists" who don't use IE, or a real mail
> client (some even use Pine, Pegasus, etc. -IMAP) to connect to the
> Exchange 2007 server. They have an Edge server that makes spam with X-
> Spam-bla I want to move all of the messages to a folder For all users.
> Since most
-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules
Tell me how to create the rule you want in Outlook, then I'll talk to you
about alternate client rule support.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael
I'll be at TEC&
Tell me how to create the rule you want in Outlook, then I'll talk to you
about alternate client rule support.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael
I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php
-Origin
Evan,
You need to create an outlook profile using that username and login as that
user to setup the rules. Then create rules that are server-side rather than
client-side.
http://www.slipstick.net/rules/serverbased.htm
We do this all the time on user and resource mailboxes.
-troy
-Origina
The rules are less reliable than in OLK2k, but Outlook is much more
stable in 2k2
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 18:14
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules are not working correctly
Some of us have found
A lot?
-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 3:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules are not working correctly
Some?
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
"Who's watching yo
ge Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules are not working correctly
Some of us have found that rules in OutlookXP do not function correctly.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Chadbourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 2:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE
Some of us have found that rules in OutlookXP do not function correctly.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Chadbourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 2:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules are not working correctly
Actually it appears that
Actually it appears that outlook will sometimes copy messages to there
proper location instead of moving them. The rule is set up to move yet
sometimes it will move other times it will copy. If I run the rules
again manually then the copies still in the inbox get moved to there
proper folder howev
Have you tried recreating the Mail profile on the users desktop? I see them
get corrupt all the time. If you have complex rules and want to try to save
them, goto Rules Wizard, Options, then export them. After creating a new
profile, import them.
Courtney Piratzky
IT-Technical Services
Sr. Syste
And are they moving messages within the "additional" mailbox or are they
moving messages to the "primary" mailbox?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 3:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Ru
Ah, so what changed?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 3:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Rules in error
Boy, I could imagine the flames if I said PST *laugh* these
are going to exchange mailboxes...
A
chap.
Regards,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 5:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules in error
What exactly are they trying to do with this "rule"?
-Original Message-
From: [
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules in error
So do the emails go to a PST or do they try to go to another Exch
mailbox.
If they go to a PST, they will always be client side, since the PST is
unavailable to Exch server when Outlook is closed.
If they go to another Exch mailbox, you try
What exactly are they trying to do with this "rule"?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 2:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules in error
That's the problem Don... all the rules we crea
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 2:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules in error
That's the problem Don... all the rules we create end up being client
side only.
I've got our tech guys on it now with
That's the problem Don... all the rules we create end up being client side only.
I've got our tech guys on it now with your info...
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 5:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rule
Provided that they are server side rules and not client side rules...
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 2:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules in error
Create the rules in the "additional" mailbox with
Create the rules in the "additional" mailbox within its own profile.
When it is opened up as an additional mailbox, the rules should process
as advertised.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 2:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Is
about 10 who have upgraded here and
seen this issue.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Page [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 6:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules w/ e2k, and OXP client Arbitrarily working?
I see that occasionally myself with Outlook
--
Standup Comedy Klingon: I just kill me today.
-
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2001 4:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rules w/ e2k, and OXP client A
62 matches
Mail list logo
