I've set MOZILLA_NO_ASYNC_DNS, and MOZILLA_HOME, but neither of these
seem to fix the problem for me of netscape hanging when trying to start
it offline. I've got about 1800 messages to read through, so hopefully I
don't have to connect just to read my email ;-)
--
*=
hi,
in my company we have a proxy server connected to the internet. The server
will only allow certain ip addresses to go out. So i set up one linux box to
masquerade giving it an ip address which the proxy server will allow to go out.
When i change the NT client to point to that linux bo
Alan Shoemaker wrote:
> What's the FBDev and where is it available?
That's not Mandrake-specific: the FBDev is the X server based on the
kernel support (new in linux 2.2) for the frame buffer in the video
board.
On a PC this usually requires a board with VESA 2+ Bios (which
thankfully
has been th
Hi,
I get this error in my maillog :
Sep 2 19:37:31 sak sendmail[3686]: TAA03686: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
size=555, class=0, pri=30555, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
proto=SMTP, relay=law2-f96.hotmail.com [216.32.181.96]
Sep 2 19:37:32 sak sendmail[3688]: TAA03686: SYSERR(root):
cyb
On Wed, 01 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> >Hmm...have you tried "chown www" Don't know if that'll
> >fix it, but it's worth a shot...
> > John
>
>
> That would defeat the purpose of SuExec. The whole idea is to let users run CGI
> scripts as themselves, NOT as www (or nobody. as it seems to be insi
Ever since upgrading from RH 5.1 to Mandrake 6.0, I have had print
problems with my HP Laserjet 4+. When I attempt to print from Star
Office 5.x, or Netscape 4.61, or WordPerfect 8, the printer displays a
message asking me to load A4 paper. I am in the US and we use "letter"
size paper, which is
Mike Abney wrote:
> Now, I don't want to knock the distribution in general. I think it's
> great. The (significant) changes from the actual RedHat distro seem very
> worthwhile.
Agreed.
--
Ron Stodden
Just finished the install of 6.1b. I actually upgraded over a 6.0 install
that had a few cooker rpm's in it. Everything came out correctly and works
well.
Very nicely done!
Hoyt
RTSP is not supported by ipchains AFAIK. It's not an easy task to
implement.
However, there is a special RTSP proxy available for QuickTime that is in
development by Apple for MacOS X, and it compiles on Linux. I will release
it in RPM format within a week or so, as there are a few include confl
Forgive me, but I'm stuck:
I'm running ipchains on Mandrake 6.0 with diald. I'm having a great
time with Mandrake, BTW.
However, quicktime streaming doesn't pass through the box to my Mac, and
virtually everything else passes right through (when the Mac is
connected directly to my ISP, Quicktime
-Original Message-
From: John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, September 01, 1999 10:06 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: [expert] Apache and SuExec
>On Wed, 01 Sep 1999, you wrote:
>> OK, I've done that and after a bit of fiddling with the actual
Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
>
> On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Alan Shoemaker wrote:
>
> > Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
> >
> > > I believe the card will run with the Mach64 Xserver, it will definately
> > > work with the FBDev server (far as i can tell you'd have to be a sound
> > > card not to work with the FBD
Sam Gentile wrote:
>
> Ok, now I need the part about getting through the Proxy Server and if not
> how to download it all from NT and then how to set up boot disks and where
> to go from there.
Concerning the Proxy problem you can download from http:// from a lot's of
server (you just need to re
On Wed, 01 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> OK, I've done that and after a bit of fiddling with the actual source code (it
> kept insisting on putting things in /home/httpd/html, I got it to re-compile
> and install. Thankyou for the advice.
>
> However, I still cannot get SuExec to think the webserve
>Tom Berger wrote:
>>
>> People don't buy M because it is based on Redhat like ten or
>> twenty other distros (else they would buy Redhat, right?) but #
>> because it's Mandrake. If we've got a new version ready, we
>> release it. I don't see why we should wait for RedHat to catch
>> up...
>
>Um..
On Wed, 01 Sep 1999, you wrote:
>
> Now that all said, we need not worry about a 7.X compatablility untill
> it comes along. 6.1 is being released because we think it's ready. We will
> worry about the next major release when it comes along, by then who knows
> Maybe it will be Redhat worrying abo
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Darin wrote:
>I compiled and installed 2.2.12 last week.. The SMP works a little more
> efficiently than the 2.2.9 that I was running.. The 6.1pre release has kernel
> 2.2.11 which as I recall had a memory leak problem..
It has 2.2.11-ac3, which has no memory leak probl
The main reason why is switched to Mandrake is the distribution contains
the latest releases, and everything is well-integrated.
Jean-Michel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Radde, Timothy P wrote:
> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 14:09:11 -0400
> From: "Radde, Timothy P" <[EMA
OK, I've done that and after a bit of fiddling with the actual source code (it
kept insisting on putting things in /home/httpd/html, I got it to re-compile
and install. Thankyou for the advice.
However, I still cannot get SuExec to think the webserver should be run by
user www instead of nob
I tried both Redhat 6.0 and Mandrake 6.0. I preferred Mandrake. I used to
use
Slackware until recently.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Abney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 1999 12:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux-Mandrake 6.
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Darin wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, duncan hall wrote:
> >
> > > How is this different to COOKER?
> > >
> > > Dunc
> >
> > Cooker is an on going ever changeing development project.
> >
> > Cassini is the prerelease of 6.1, containing less
Darin wrote:
'll have to compare version info between cooker cassini and venus by
> > hadn cause i'm not gonna cover that.. take to long
> >
>
> Is there time to get the 2.2.12 kernel in before release?? Or is it too late
> for that already?
we are waiting for Alan to release his patches to 2.2
I have just started running Mandrake here after being a Red Hat user for a
couple of years. Most people I know haven't heard of Mandrake, but
everyone knows who Red Hat is. Honestly, it feels like Red Hat to me!
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Jean-Michel Daul
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Sam Gentile wrote:
> What is wwwofle? Is it an application?
(devel@jumpstart)(~)> rpm -qp --queryformat '%{name}\n%{summary}\n\n%{description}\n'
/ftp/pub/mirrors/cooker/contrib/RPMS/wwwoffle-2.4-1mdk.i586.rpm
wwwoffle
WWW Offline Explorer - Caching Web Proxy Server
A proxy
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Alan Shoemaker wrote:
> Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
>
> > I believe the card will run with the Mach64 Xserver, it will definately
> > work with the FBDev server (far as i can tell you'd have to be a sound
> > card not to work with the FBDev)
> >
> > --
> > MandrakeSoft
What is wwwofle? Is it an application?
Let's keep away from the Microsoft bashing. There's plety of good in both
operating systems and plenty of bad.
Sam
-Original Message-
From: Axalon Bloodstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 1999 10:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECT
For three weeks, we have realized survey about the professional uses of
Linux-Mandrake. The results are now available on:
htttp://www.linux-mandrake.com/bizcase/
Here a synthesis:
- More than 80 different cases of business use
- 4 different continents (Usa, Brazil, Malaysia, Australia, Europe)
On Wed, 01 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, duncan hall wrote:
>
> > How is this different to COOKER?
> >
> > Dunc
>
> Cooker is an on going ever changeing development project.
>
> Cassini is the prerelease of 6.1, containing less "bleeding edge" software
> than cooker. The Cassini t
Tom Berger wrote:
>
> People don't buy M because it is based on Redhat like ten or twenty other
> distros (else they would buy Redhat, right?) but because it's Mandrake. If
> we've got a new version ready, we release it. I don't see why we should
> wait for RedHat to catch up...
Um... actually,
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Gael Duval wrote:
> Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
> > Here's a quick run thru of the versions:
> >
> > 5.2 = Redhat + kde + all the other stuff (sane, and maxwell to name a few)
> >
> > 5.3 = Linux Mandrake 5.2 + fixes + updates
> >
> > 6.0 = Linux Mandrake 5.3 + fixes + Merge w
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
[snip]
> You could always redirect some ports i imagine. If you can you need to
> ditch the over priced firewall/proxy software .
[snip]
s/can/cant/
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Sam Gentile wrote:
> Ok, now I need the part about getting through the Proxy Server and if not
> how to download it all from NT and then how to set up boot disks and where
> to go from there.
>
> Thanks!
Call microsoft tech support, sit on hold for two hours and pay the 25$
Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
> I believe the card will run with the Mach64 Xserver, it will definately
> work with the FBDev server (far as i can tell you'd have to be a sound
> card not to work with the FBDev)
>
> --
> MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
>
Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
> Here's a quick run thru of the versions:
>
> 5.2 = Redhat + kde + all the other stuff (sane, and maxwell to name a few)
>
> 5.3 = Linux Mandrake 5.2 + fixes + updates
>
> 6.0 = Linux Mandrake 5.3 + fixes + Merge with Redhats core changes +
> updates + Another
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Jean-Michel Dault wrote:
>
> Don't you think it's about time that people stop calling us "a better
> RedHat than RedHat"?
>
> Development of Mandrake is not tied to the development of RedHat. Those
> are two different distributions, but using the same packaging method.
>
>
Sam Gentile wrote:
>
> This is NOT sufficient information to test it. Not all of us are experts but
> we NEED the features in Cassini badly. You need to add step by step
> instructions on the Cassini page on how to set up fmirror with a sample file
> going aggainst a valid MANDRAKE location, not
It depends whether Mandrake's long term plan is to remain as a copy-cat
distribution, or if it has more ambitious plans to fill the market it is
targetting so effectively now. If you can honestly be described as the best
linux distribution for a given group, is it good enough to simply tweak
some
Don't you think it's about time that people stop calling us "a better
RedHat than RedHat"?
Development of Mandrake is not tied to the development of RedHat. Those
are two different distributions, but using the same packaging method.
Releasing 6.1 before RedHat proves the point! ;-)
Jean-Miche
Ron Stodden wrote:
>
> Gael,
>
> Are you planning to issue a 6.1 BEFORE Red Hat issues its 6.1?Won't
> that lead to endless future confusion?
>
> If your planned 6.1 is still based on Red Hat's 6.0, you would be MUCH
> better advised to call it 6.02, or 6.0.2mdk or just Mandrake 2, surely?
On Wed, 01 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> John,
>I compiled and installed 2.2.12 last week.. The SMP works a little more
> efficiently than the 2.2.9 that I was running.. The 6.1pre release has kernel
> 2.2.11 which as I recall had a memory leak problem..
>
HmmOk. Well, I'll either download the
Gael,
Are you planning to issue a 6.1 BEFORE Red Hat issues its 6.1?Won't
that lead to endless future confusion?
If your planned 6.1 is still based on Red Hat's 6.0, you would be MUCH
better advised to call it 6.02, or 6.0.2mdk or just Mandrake 2, surely?
--
Ron Stodden
Using Virtual Acc
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, duncan hall wrote:
> How is this different to COOKER?
>
> Dunc
Cooker is an on going ever changeing development project.
Cassini is the prerelease of 6.1, containing less "bleeding edge" software
than cooker. The Cassini team "basicly" took Cooker in one hand Venus in
tthe
At 04:14 01/09/99 -0600, you wrote:
>On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, Mike Hill wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> My first post to this group. Hopefully this qualifies as an expert
>> question.
>>
>> I'm running a couple Linux-Mandrake 6.0-2 boxes at a company I do work for.
>> One of them is running 8 modems o
On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, Jeanette Russo wrote:
> Hi Gael,
> sounds good sure hope this will be an easy upgrade. I am finding all the
> problems in Mandrake 6.0 but its a beaut Hope this one has less bugs.
> Jeanette
Thats the general plan.
PS. I'm hopeing for a bigger turn out than the Mariner bet
On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, Alan Shoemaker wrote:
> TO: Anyone from Mandrakesoft
>
> I just answered a listmember's question about the ATI Rage Fury. The
> answer was that there appears to be no support for it in the list of
> suported cards on http://www.xfree86.org/3.3.4/ati3.html, which is the
> li
On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, Mike Hill wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> My first post to this group. Hopefully this qualifies as an expert
> question.
>
> I'm running a couple Linux-Mandrake 6.0-2 boxes at a company I do work for.
> One of them is running 8 modems on a dial in pool. Users are calling in
> fro
46 matches
Mail list logo
