Stupid question: when removing hdb, you aren't changing hdc jumpers, are
you??
El vie, 07-03-2003 a las 12:19, Mark Watts escribió:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have a system with 3 harddrives in it (hda = Windows, hdb = spare (part XFS,
part FAT32) and hdc =
El Vie 07 Mar 2003 20:24, Jack Coates escribió sabiamente:
I have 384M of RAM and I'm using VMWare. Currently I give it 128M to
play with, which because of that shared memory tmpfs Solaris-like voodoo
is implemented under /tmp.
For whatever reason, my system has set a maximum size of 188M on
zephod wrote:
If I remember correctly, I think
/var/lib/rpm/__db.001
/var/lib/rpm/__db.002
...
would solve the problem
the *real* question is, why rpm database corruption happens so often?
(looking at reports here and my own experience).
And then why the removing of those files isn't
On Saturday 08 March 2003 11:11, Luca Olivetti wrote:
the *real* question is, why rpm database corruption happens so often?
(looking at reports here and my own experience).
I think that in some cases the rpm database does not clean up properly when
you kill an rpm command in progress. I must
On Friday 07 March 2003 09:33 pm, Gary Hodder wrote:
Hi Mark,
with the 3 drives in and it boots normally, edit the fstab file and
change the hdc? to hdb?
? being the partition number.
Change lilo to be hdb instead of hdc.
Reboot with a floppy, at lilo promp: linux root=/dev/hdb?
? being
OK. I fiddled some more with it (a few hours). None of the parameters you
gave me worked. Same problem. With the enterprise kernel there is a small
difference which I noticed just now (or at least in the 12mdk enterprise
kernel from cooker). It lights Scroll lock and Caps lock but doesn't blink.
Todd Lyons wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adrian Golumbovici wrote on Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 06:23:13PM +0100 :
Also I checked and mem=960M doesn't help and the enterprise kernel has same
problem. I tried lowering the mem value even further and with 900 didn't
work. With 800
On Saturday 08 March 2003 06:48 am, Adrian Golumbovici wrote:
OK. I fiddled some more with it (a few hours). None of the parameters you
gave me worked. Same problem. With the enterprise kernel there is a small
difference which I noticed just now (or at least in the 12mdk enterprise
kernel from
I left it for a couple of minutes, but with no reaction and those lights on
keyboard lighting (which normally don't light) I figured it crashed. Anyway,
if that mode is not supported by my video card, why does that setting work
with 512MB but it freezes as long as it has 1024MB RAM?!?
Best
On Saturday 08 March 2003 07:03 am, Adrian Golumbovici wrote:
I left it for a couple of minutes, but with no reaction and those lights on
keyboard lighting (which normally don't light) I figured it crashed.
Anyway, if that mode is not supported by my video card, why does that
setting work with
zephod wrote:
the *real* question is, why rpm database corruption happens so often?
(looking at reports here and my own experience).
I think that in some cases the rpm database does not clean up properly when
you kill an rpm command in progress. I must say that I have seen this problem
only
On Saturday 08 March 2003 03:03 am, Adrian Golumbovici wrote:
I left it for a couple of minutes, but with no reaction and those lights on
keyboard lighting (which normally don't light) I figured it crashed.
Anyway, if that mode is not supported by my video card, why does that
setting work with
Ummm... But then again. I can start X and run linux just fine after I boot
without that parameter. Does that mean the mapping of the framebuffer is
back to normal after boot?!? I would love to shove this motherboard up the
manufacturers ... behind. :) But how come other OS (I hate to even
I have a computer with only 128MB ram, it chuggs along very slowly in X
Windows. in fstab there is a /tmp tempfs ramdisk, I commented it out so
that it now uses the root /tmp. However, performace is still about the
same, odd considering there should be about 64MB of ram extra available.
Any
Hi,
A long time ago I used the Slackware, then I used tgz
packages.
When I knew the RPM was love the first sight, but now
I see that it is not well what I waited.
Some friends speak that apt is the best system of
packages and for that they had spoken to me, it is
really good.
The Mandrake
Emerson de Mello wrote:
When I knew the RPM was love the first sight, but now
I see that it is not well what I waited.
I actually think that rpm is great, I only wish it were more robust.
Some friends speak that apt is the best system of
packages and for that they had spoken to me, it is
really
Luca Olivetti wrote:
I think that in some cases the rpm database does not clean up properly
when you kill an rpm command in progress. I must say that I have seen
this problem only with the rpm-system shipped with Mandrake 9.0.
Nope, I saw this also on 8.2 (in fact I have a cd writer server
I found this on Google..
http://www.ale.org/archive/ale/ale-2002-09/msg00205.html
Hope that helps
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 07:40, Dennis Lyon wrote:
Does anyone know of a driver to support this card? (I am running MD 9.0)
And, if so, where would I find the detailed instructions on how to add
I have a computer with only 128MB ram, it chuggs along very slowly in X
Windows. in fstab there is a /tmp tempfs ramdisk, I commented it out so
I've not looked at tmpfs. My guess is that if /tmp is empty, or has
little in it, there really shouldn't be half (which is the default) of
the RAM
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 06:42, David E. Fox wrote:
I have a computer with only 128MB ram, it chuggs along very slowly in X
Windows. in fstab there is a /tmp tempfs ramdisk, I commented it out so
I've not looked at tmpfs. My guess is that if /tmp is empty, or has
little in it, there really
On 07 Mar 2003 19:56:21 -0800 Jack Coates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 17:25, Pierre Fortin wrote:
...
In this case, I *want* 700... no sane automated security system
should ever *reduce* security levels setup by the owner... it's
downright nasty IMNSHO...
...
rant
On Saturday 08 March 2003 04:07 am, Adrian Golumbovici wrote:
Ummm... But then again. I can start X and run linux just fine after I boot
without that parameter. Does that mean the mapping of the framebuffer is
back to normal after boot?!? I would love to shove this motherboard up the
On Saturday 08 March 2003 04:14 am, J. Grant wrote:
I have a computer with only 128MB ram, it chuggs along very slowly in X
Windows. in fstab there is a /tmp tempfs ramdisk, I commented it out so
that it now uses the root /tmp. However, performace is still about the
same, odd considering
On Saturday 08 March 2003 04:29 am, Emerson de Mello wrote:
Hi,
A long time ago I used the Slackware, then I used tgz
packages.
When I knew the RPM was love the first sight, but now
I see that it is not well what I waited.
Some friends speak that apt is the best system of
packages and
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 07:08, Pierre Fortin wrote:
...
buckled tighter than NORAD.
Funny you should mention NORAD... from '64 to '71, I worked in NORAD HQ
(Canada) deep under the mountain... so I have my own opinions about how
thight NORAD is... can't say any more... :
I actually
I am interested. Of course I am. I want to find out if it really is a kernel
or mobo problem. Unless I can prove that my mobo is not working right I have
no chance of giving it back. If you can help me trace the exact problem I
would be gratefull. I would love to bring back the motherboard to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On March 7, 2003 19:33 pm, Pierre Fortin wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 12:09:20 -0600 (CST) J.P. Pasnak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pierre Fortin said:
SIGH... I recently noticed that all my users' home directories
had 755 permissions...
On Saturday 08 March 2003 05:38 am, Kiran wrote:
I found this on Google..
http://www.ale.org/archive/ale/ale-2002-09/msg00205.html
Hope that helps
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 07:40, Dennis Lyon wrote:
Does anyone know of a driver to support this card? (I am running MD 9.0)
And, if so, where
On 08 Mar 2003 08:02:07 -0800 Jack Coates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 07:08, Pierre Fortin wrote:
...
buckled tighter than NORAD.
Funny you should mention NORAD... from '64 to '71, I worked in NORAD
HQ(Canada) deep under the mountain... so I have my own opinions
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 10:03:07 -0600 J.P. Pasnak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On March 7, 2003 19:33 pm, Pierre Fortin wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 12:09:20 -0600 (CST) J.P. Pasnak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pierre Fortin said:
SIGH... I
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 08:30, Pierre Fortin wrote:
...
the matrix idea requires the administrator to first learn the matrix,
second agree or disagree with it, and third make adjustments in
perm.local. Absence of a matrix requires the administrator to make all
the decisions from scratch.
Great. Now if there just were a way to avoid vewing it in Netscape 7.0. :-/
I'm very sorry!!! I didn't know that i was writting messages in html. I've
...
It isn't difficult to modify Outlook Express to disable HTML (which is enabled
by default). Tools-Options-Send-Mail Sending Format
Want
There is. Use an e-mail program that has filters.
On Saturday 08 March 2003 10:08 am, Jim C wrote:
Great. Now if there just were a way to avoid vewing it in Netscape 7.0.
:-/
I'm very sorry!!! I didn't know that i was writting messages in html.
I've
...
It isn't difficult to modify
Netscape 7.0 does have filters and I employ them in concert with
SpamPal. What it doesn't have is the ability to add:
!-- to the beginning and -- to the end of any file that contains
HTML or html etc. I don't want to eliminate the mail all together
because I do occasionally get html messages I
Netscape 7.0 does have filters and I employ them in concert with
SpamPal. What it doesn't have is the ability to add:
!-- to the beginning and -- to the end of any file that contains
HTML or html etc. I don't want to eliminate the mail all together
because I do occasionally get html messages I
Whoops. Double wammy! Sorry.
Jim C wrote:
Netscape 7.0 does have filters and I employ them in concert with
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Saturday 08 Mar 2003 5:50 pm, Jim C wrote:
Netscape 7.0 does have filters and I employ them in concert with
SpamPal. What it doesn't have is the ability to add:
!-- to the beginning and -- to the end of any file that contains
HTML or html etc. I don't want to eliminate the mail all
On one occasion I logged in to webmin whilst otherwise distracted - except
that I made a very stupid mistake. I typed 'root', then tab, then password -
but webmin login doesn't recognise tabbing to the next field. Ever since
then as soon as I type 'r' I am shown root and the root+password
Short form: There is no way provided to turn html off, as far as I can
tell, in Netscape 7.0. No check box and no known means of doing so by
inserting comments anywhere in the system.
I'm not sure I understand your problem. FWIW, though, KMail displays the
plain text version of a dual-mode
On Friday 07 March 2003 07:16 pm, Rob Blomquist wrote:
They are both mounted as ide-scsi so that they could be seen my
x-cd-roast., I have given up with that utility, as it could not see
my IDE HD.
I use Gcombust here - works great. End of the day message from most
experienced users on this
The webmin login user name and password have been saved in a browser cookie
on the workstation computer. Delete the cookie.
-admintiger
From: Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [expert] How to mend a stupid slip?
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003
On Friday 07 March 2003 07:20 pm, Todd Lyons wrote:
Chill guys. He was booted from the list within minutes of having sent
that.
Blue skies... Todd
Hey, can someone get all the names of everyone who has ever been booted from
this list, post them on their website, with a
Thanks for the reply. I've checked cookies on Konq, Netscape and Galeon, but
can't find it. Could you give me any more pointers?
Anne
On Saturday 08 Mar 2003 6:59 pm, Bob Brickey wrote:
The webmin login user name and password have been saved in a browser cookie
on the workstation computer.
On Fri Mar 07, 2003 at 11:49:06PM -0300, Leonardo wrote:
I'm very sorry!!! I didn't know that i was writting messages in html. I've
had some problems with my home mdk box so i'm using (unfortunately) outlook.
I'll try to figure out if there's any option that can disable the html
format on
On Saturday 08 March 2003 01:57 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Friday 07 March 2003 07:16 pm, Rob Blomquist wrote:
They are both mounted as ide-scsi so that they could be seen my
x-cd-roast., I have given up with that utility, as it could not see
my IDE HD.
I use Gcombust here - works
On Saturday 08 March 2003 02:51 pm, et wrote:
hey that stuff about scsi bus 1, it should be noted, is only if you have
real scsi, is it not?
Hey.
Hmm, not here or I'm badly mixed up. Here are my cdrecord --scanbus results:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] darklord]# cdrecord --scanbus
Cdrecord 1.11a32
Something which would test motherboard (also bios and memory addressing)
related problems?
I used memtest86 but if I understood it right it will just test the memory
itself but not the real way an operating system handles it.
Best regards,
Adrian
Want to buy your Pack or Services from
Hi guys,
You remember my problem with 1GB of memory on my A7V8X card, vga=788 and
kernel compiled with high mem support (2.4.21-0.13mdk enterprise)
combination ending in a kernel oops.
I did my best to learn about tracing stuff in linux / linux kernel and I
patched the kernel with the kmsgdump
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 14:55:24 -0500
Ronald J. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that my true SCSI devices (Toshiba/Plextor) are on scsibus0,
while my IDE ZIP drive, SCSI emulated, is on scsibus1. I'm assuming
here (dangerous!) that SCSI emulated devices would go on scsibus1.
Can anyone else
Anne
In Netscape (and Mozilla, I believe), you can delete the saved
passwords by going into Edit - Preferences - Privacy Security
-Passwords - Manage Passwords
Locate the password that you want to delete, and delete it
Darcy
Anne Wilson wrote:
Thanks for the reply. I've checked cookies on
I got this one.
Turns out that the default is no tilde (i.e. the ~ character) in the
userid and permissions have to be ??5 on public_html, all subdirectories
and the directory below it (i.e. the users home directory).
So to access dudes website, you enter:
On Saturday March 8 2003 01:55 pm, Adrian Golumbovici wrote:
Something which would test motherboard (also bios and memory
addressing) related problems?
I used memtest86 but if I understood it right it will just test the
memory itself but not the real way an operating system handles it.
Best
It's not there - but then it didn't get as far as making a password - it
stored the login name and password as one, without a password. I have never
selected 'remember password' for webmin. I'm at a loss where to look next.
Anne
On Saturday 08 Mar 2003 9:04 pm, Darcy Brodie, CJL wrote:
Anne
Not to disagree with you Todd, but when you say They get their billion... are you
referring to SCO or the lawyers (not that it makes much difference)? :)
Way I see it, there are a couple of questions. Q1) Was IBM entitled to use the code?
A1) Yes, that is not part of the litigation. Q2) Was
If you realy want it gone export your addressbook and bookmarks and
e-mail to some othe folder and then delete the .mozilla folder in your
home dir.
Ralph :-)
Anne Wilson wrote:
It's not there - but then it didn't get as far as making a password - it
stored the login name and password
On Saturday 08 March 2003 04:53 pm, Joeb wrote:
Not to disagree with you Todd, but when you say They get their billion...
are you referring to SCO or the lawyers (not that it makes much
difference)? :)
Way I see it, there are a couple of questions. Q1) Was IBM entitled to use
the code? A1)
I don't know about Netscape or Mozilla. However, MS Internet Explorer saves
cookies in two different folders.
One is:
C:\Documents and Settings\(UserName)\Cookies\
The other is:
C:\Documents and Settings\(UserName)\Local Settings\Temp\Temporary Internet
Files\
If the Remember Password option
Hi Adrian,
damn - some people really want to know it in detail :) Congrats. Like
people digging to find the problems :)
From some of the messages, civilme seems to be right with what the
kernel relies on the BIOS stuff for memory addressing - and when trying
to remap some pages - it seems to
But why would webmin write to Mozilla?
Anne
On Saturday 08 Mar 2003 10:01 pm, Ralph Crongeyer wrote:
If you realy want it gone export your addressbook and bookmarks and
e-mail to some othe folder and then delete the .mozilla folder in your
home dir.
Ralph :-)
Anne Wilson wrote:
It's not
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 18:27, Bob Brickey wrote:
I don't know about Netscape or Mozilla. However, MS Internet Explorer saves
cookies in two different folders.
In Netscape:
Edit-Preferences-Privacy Security-Cookies-Manage Stored Cookies.
I guess it is the same in Mozilla.
--
__
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 18:47, Anne Wilson wrote:
But why would webmin write to Mozilla?
Anne
It might be that you enabled Remember Login.
Locate the cookie named localhost:1 (or localhost.localdomain:1000)
and delete it.
HTH
--
__
/ \\ @ __
Webmin uses Konqueror. I have looked through all the cookies in Konq, and can
find nothing that seems to be related to webmin. I have never allowed it to
'save password'.
Anne
On Saturday 08 Mar 2003 10:27 pm, Bob Brickey wrote:
I don't know about Netscape or Mozilla. However, MS Internet
On Saturday 08 Mar 2003 10:56 pm, Adolfo Bello wrote:
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 18:47, Anne Wilson wrote:
But why would webmin write to Mozilla?
Anne
It might be that you enabled Remember Login.
Definitely not
Locate the cookie named localhost:1 (or localhost.localdomain:1000)
and
On Saturday 08 Mar 2003 10:52 pm, Adolfo Bello wrote:
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 18:27, Bob Brickey wrote:
I don't know about Netscape or Mozilla. However, MS Internet Explorer
saves cookies in two different folders.
In Netscape:
Edit-Preferences-Privacy Security-Cookies-Manage Stored
On Sunday 09 March 2003 00:00, Anne Wilson wrote:
Webmin uses Konqueror. It is not stored as any cookie that I can see.
Anne
What does that mean ?
You have only used konquerror for webmin and now mozilla knows you login name
for webmin ? Kind of strange , isn't it ?
--
Regards
Steffen
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 17:11:23 -0500
Greg Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 08 March 2003 04:53 pm, Joeb wrote:
Not to disagree with you Todd, but when you say They get their billion...
are you referring to SCO or the lawyers (not that it makes much
difference)? :)
Way I see it,
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 19:16, Steffen Barszus wrote:
On Sunday 09 March 2003 00:00, Anne Wilson wrote:
Webmin uses Konqueror. It is not stored as any cookie that I can see.
Anne
What does that mean ?
You have only used konquerror for webmin and now mozilla knows you login name
for
On Saturday 08 March 2003 05:58 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
Webmin uses Konqueror. I have looked through all the cookies in Konq, and
can find nothing that seems to be related to webmin. I have never allowed
it to 'save password'.
I thought webmin used whatever browser I used to access it.
--
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 08:02, Jack Coates wrote:
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 07:08, Pierre Fortin wrote:
...
buckled tighter than NORAD.
Funny you should mention NORAD... from '64 to '71, I worked in NORAD HQ
(Canada) deep under the mountain... so I have my own opinions about how
thight
In webmin there is a setting to rember the password if you turned this
on just change the root user's password and go to webmin and when
prompted for the new password uncheck the "Always Rember Password" box.
If this is the case (Webmin I mean) youshould not let webmin run all
the time anyway.
Dark,
With 4 versions of Linux on one box with a ide-scsi burner... each
one puts that ONE, LONE, DEVICE, I'd say if it works it's in the right
place don't worry about it *grin*
James
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 11:55, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Saturday 08 March 2003 02:51 pm, et wrote:
Sorry for posting to my own post.
If that doesn't work.
There is a section in Webmin "Webmin Configuration -
Authentacation" make sure that "Always require username and password"
is checked.
Ralph
Ralph Crongeyer wrote:
In webmin there is a setting to rember the password if you turned
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 05:52, Luca Olivetti wrote:
Luca Olivetti wrote:
I think that in some cases the rpm database does not clean up properly
when you kill an rpm command in progress. I must say that I have seen
this problem only with the rpm-system shipped with Mandrake 9.0.
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 14:46, Anne Wilson wrote:
On one occasion I logged in to webmin whilst otherwise distracted - except
that I made a very stupid mistake. I typed 'root', then tab, then password -
but webmin login doesn't recognise tabbing to the next field. Ever since
then as soon as
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 13:27, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Saturday March 8 2003 01:55 pm, Adrian Golumbovici wrote:
Something which would test motherboard (also bios and memory
addressing) related problems?
I used memtest86 but if I understood it right it will just test the
memory itself but
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 19:49, Adolfo Bello wrote:
Anne:
I just recreated your problem: I entered the userid and password in the
user id box. Even when the login was unsuccessful, Konqueror saved that
userid which shows the password.
You can disable the entire feature in Settings-Configure
On 08 Mar 2003 08:47:28 -0800 Jack Coates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 08:30, Pierre Fortin wrote:
...
the matrix idea requires the administrator to first learn the
matrix, second agree or disagree with it, and third make adjustments
in perm.local. Absence of a matrix
I am interested. Of course I am. I want to find out if it really is a kernel
or mobo problem. Unless I can prove that my mobo is not working right I have
Well - suggestions: join the kernel hackers mailing list, or just
read the archives. Try the instructions in the bug tracking documents
I am a pretty fair newbie in internet security issues, use of iptables
and so forth. But I already have been attacked by some variant of a
worm that attacked certain ports on my system, slowing my internet
connection etc. I noticed before certain udp checksom problems when
that happened, and at
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 19:57:57 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David
E. Fox) wrote:
I am a pretty fair newbie in internet security issues, use of iptables
and so forth. But I already have been attacked by some variant of a
worm that attacked certain ports on my system, slowing my internet
Hi guys,
You remember my problem with 1GB of memory on my A7V8X card, vga=788 and
kernel compiled with high mem support (2.4.21-0.13mdk enterprise)
combination ending in a kernel oops.
I did my best to learn about tracing stuff in linux / linux kernel and I
patched the kernel with the kmsgdump
81 matches
Mail list logo
