ed tharp schrieb am 22 Sep 2003 07:17:11 -0400:
> Thank God I knew a Wolfgang there, about the same time frame (late
> 60s early 70s), I wouldn't want _my_ past to effect the present...
That bad? I still have a loose contact to one of the US guys from that
times, he's living in Dayton, Ohio.
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 03:09, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> ed tharp schrieb am 21 Sep 2003 21:03:49 -0400:
>
> > not Hochspier in the Pfalzerwald?
>
> No.
>
> wobo
>
Thank God I knew a Wolfgang there, about the same time frame (late
60s early 70s), I wouldn't want _my_ past to effect the prese
ed tharp schrieb am 21 Sep 2003 21:03:49 -0400:
> not Hochspier in the Pfalzerwald?
No.
wobo
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 20:21, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> ed tharp schrieb am 21 Sep 2003 18:30:48 -0400:
>
> > don't tell me them crazy Germans or American Military are letting WoBo
> > near Nuke Power OMG...
>
> Not the Germans, but the American Military actually did! I spent some
> time bein
ed tharp schrieb am 21 Sep 2003 18:30:48 -0400:
> don't tell me them crazy Germans or American Military are letting WoBo
> near Nuke Power OMG...
Not the Germans, but the American Military actually did! I spent some
time being liason officer to a USAF group due to the fact that Germans
are n
Hallo WoBo,
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 00:20:24 +0200, Wolfgang Bornath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about Re: [expert] hijacking: was Gopher was something else:
>Damn! You caught me! I thought i could gather some DAU[1] points.
>
>[1] German: Duemmster Anzunehmender User = Dumbest Credible
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 18:20, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> Dick Gevers schrieb am Sun, 21 Sep 2003 21:02:59 +:
>
> > On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 12:23:36 -0600, "Charlie M."
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: [expert] hijacking: was Gopher
> > was something
Dick Gevers schrieb am Sun, 21 Sep 2003 21:02:59 +:
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 12:23:36 -0600, "Charlie M."
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: [expert] hijacking: was Gopher
> was something else:
>
> >September 21, 2003 11:30 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
September 21, 2003 02:28 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 11:23, Charlie M. wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > September 21, 2003 11:30 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> > > Charlie M. schrieb am Sun, 21
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
September 21, 2003 03:02 pm, Dick Gevers wrote:
> Hi Charlie, Hi WoBo,
>
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 12:23:36 -0600, "Charlie M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote about Re: [expert] hijacking: was Gopher was something else:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Charlie, Hi WoBo,
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 12:23:36 -0600, "Charlie M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about Re: [expert] hijacking: was Gopher was something else:
>September 21, 2003 11:30 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
>> Charlie
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 11:23, Charlie M. wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> September 21, 2003 11:30 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> > Charlie M. schrieb am Sun, 21 Sep 2003 10:48:51 -0600:
> >
> > Sorry for top-posting:
>
> Since it's going to happen again wobo it's OK.
>
On Sunday 21 Sep 2003 5:48 pm, Charlie M. wrote:
>
> This is something that I add to all systems that I help new
> converts with.
OK - We had covered quite a few of the points, but I've put on a
slightly shortened version of the section on asking for help -
shorter because your version has a pe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
September 21, 2003 11:55 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Sunday 21 Sep 2003 5:48 pm, Charlie M. wrote:
> > This is something that I add to all systems that I help new
> > converts with.
>
> I'll try to compare this with the existing script and see what we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
September 21, 2003 11:30 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> Charlie M. schrieb am Sun, 21 Sep 2003 10:48:51 -0600:
>
> Sorry for top-posting:
Since it's going to happen again wobo it's OK.
> Nice text and covering nearly all aspects for a list noob.
>
>
On Sunday 21 Sep 2003 5:48 pm, Charlie M. wrote:
>
> This is something that I add to all systems that I help new
> converts with.
I'll try to compare this with the existing script and see what we have
missed. Give me a few hours, then check and comment as necessary
Anne
--
Registered Linux Us
On Sunday 21 Sep 2003 6:25 pm, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> Anne Wilson schrieb am Sun, 21 Sep 2003 16:04:03 +0100:
> > On Sunday 21 Sep 2003 3:38 pm, Eric Huff wrote:
> > > But, if someone reads our entire list and gets to a link at the
> > > bottom, they can, if interested, look into it more. We co
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 21 Sep 2003 3:38 pm, Eric Huff wrote:
Would a link to one of the many copies of RFC 1855 such
as this one be relevant here? It could be quoted as a
more thorough authority.
HTML
http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html#3
Not to be a spoil sport but isn't this a bit much?
Charlie M. schrieb am Sun, 21 Sep 2003 10:48:51 -0600:
Sorry for top-posting:
Nice text and covering nearly all aspects for a list noob.
Just a short hint at a missing word:
> 6.) Forget anything you may have been accustomed to in Windows. In
> Windows if you clicked on an MP3 file for example,
Anne Wilson schrieb am Sun, 21 Sep 2003 16:04:03 +0100:
> On Sunday 21 Sep 2003 3:38 pm, Eric Huff wrote:
> >
> > But, if someone reads our entire list and gets to a link at the
> > bottom, they can, if interested, look into it more. We could
> > expand the "The 'rules' of internet usage..." lin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
September 21, 2003 01:37 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Sunday 21 Sep 2003 4:25 am, Michael Adams wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 15:36:47 -0700
> >
> > James Sparenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 13:32, Eric Huff wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > > Would a link to one of the many copies of RFC 1855
> > I personally also prefer the informal.
> > But, if someone reads our entire list and gets to a link at the
> > bottom, they can, if interested, look into it more. We could
> > expand the "The 'rules' of internet usage..." line
On Sunday 21 Sep 2003 3:38 pm, Eric Huff wrote:
> > > > > > Would a link to one of the many copies of RFC 1855 such
> > > > > > as this one be relevant here? It could be quoted as a
> > > > > > more thorough authority.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > HTML
> > > > > > http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html#3
>
> > > > > Would a link to one of the many copies of RFC 1855 such as
> > > > > this one be relevant here? It could be quoted as a more
> > > > > thorough authority.
> > > > >
> > > > > HTML
> > > > > http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html#3
> > > Not to be a spoil sport but isn't this a bit much? 6
On Sunday 21 Sep 2003 8:37 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
> Give it
> today to get some opinions, then I'll go with the majority.
A link to the RFC is good.
--
Richard Urwin
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Sunday 21 Sep 2003 4:25 am, Michael Adams wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 15:36:47 -0700
>
> James Sparenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 13:32, Eric Huff wrote:
> > > http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/MandrakeMailingListEti
> > >quette
> > >
> > > > Would a link to
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 15:36:47 -0700
James Sparenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 13:32, Eric Huff wrote:
> > http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/MandrakeMailingListEtiquette
> >
> > > Would a link to one of the many copies of RFC 1855 such as this
> > > one be relevant
On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 13:32, Eric Huff wrote:
> http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/MandrakeMailingListEtiquette
>
> > Would a link to one of the many copies of RFC 1855 such as this
> > one be relevant here? It could be quoted as a more thorough
> > authority.
> >
> > HTML
> > http://www.d
> > Would a link to one of the many copies of RFC 1855 such as this
> > one be relevant here? It could be quoted as a more thorough
> > authority.
> >
> > HTML
> > http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html#3
> >
> > Plain Text
> > http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html
>
> Done, thanks
What? No "You got
http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/MandrakeMailingListEtiquette
> Would a link to one of the many copies of RFC 1855 such as this
> one be relevant here? It could be quoted as a more thorough
> authority.
>
> HTML
> http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html#3
>
> Plain Text
> http://www.faqs.or
On Saturday 20 Sep 2003 8:51 pm, Michael Adams wrote:
> Would a link to one of the many copies of RFC 1855 such as this one
> be relevant here? It could be quoted as a more thorough authority.
>
> HTML
> http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html#3
>
> Plain Text
> http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html
D
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 13:26:24 +0100
Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 19 Sep 2003 1:09 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/MandrakeMailingListE
> > > > >tiquette
> > > Also was the info on Hijacking left out intentionally?
> >
> >
On Sat Sep 20, 2003 at 12:28:16AM -0700, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > > Anne looks good. Vincent, Who would be the one who could possibly make
> > > a link from the sympa signup page to this page. Won't do us any good if
> > > no one reads it. Better yet, would be if it could get put into the
>
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 12:06, Vincent Danen wrote:
> On Fri Sep 19, 2003 at 11:20:30AM -0700, James Sparenberg wrote:
>
> > > > > > > http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/MandrakeMailingListE
> > > > > > >tiquette
> > > > > Also was the info on Hijacking left out intentionally?
> > > >
> >
On Fri Sep 19, 2003 at 11:20:30AM -0700, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > > > > > http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/MandrakeMailingListE
> > > > > >tiquette
> > > > Also was the info on Hijacking left out intentionally?
> > >
> > > Left to me, I think, and I'll do it today. I haven't checke
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 05:26, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Friday 19 Sep 2003 1:09 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/MandrakeMailingListE
> > > > >tiquette
> > > Also was the info on Hijacking left out intentionally?
> >
> > Left to me, I think, and I
On Friday 19 Sep 2003 1:09 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/MandrakeMailingListE
> > > >tiquette
> > Also was the info on Hijacking left out intentionally?
>
> Left to me, I think, and I'll do it today. I haven't checked the
> page yet, but if it'
On Friday 19 Sep 2003 10:50 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 02:29, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 20:49, Eric Huff wrote:
> > > > Eric, I still have a text file that I used when asked to
> > > > reply to the hijack problem. If you get started on the
> > > > e
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 02:29, James Sparenberg wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 20:49, Eric Huff wrote:
> > > Eric, I still have a text file that I used when asked to reply to the
> > > hijack problem. If you get started on the etiquette page, I'll put
> > > that on if you like.
> >
> > That would
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 20:49, Eric Huff wrote:
> > Eric, I still have a text file that I used when asked to reply to the
> > hijack problem. If you get started on the etiquette page, I'll put
> > that on if you like.
>
> That would be great! Your responses on hijacking have been more
> complete
> Eric, I still have a text file that I used when asked to reply to the
> hijack problem. If you get started on the etiquette page, I'll put
> that on if you like.
That would be great! Your responses on hijacking have been more
complete than mine...
Here is the etiquette page:
http://mandrak
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 04:30, HaywireMac wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 03:07:51 -0400 (EDT)
> Bill Mullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
>
> > Excellent idea. Maybe something about unsetting 'Reply-To:', as well.
> > :)
>
> *That* drives me even more nuts than hijacking, and waay more nuts
> than
On Thursday 18 Sep 2003 3:42 pm, Eric Huff wrote:
>
> I had planned to put a list etiquette page on the twiki, but only
> got as far as a place holder. Soon, one of us will get it there,
> but it would still need visibility on welcome page for the absolute
> newbies to see it.
Eric, I still have
> > Is there any way to get this sort of thing in the welcome letters?
> > I have to admit, i didn't know about hijacking til the 1st time i
> > turned threading on and saw my own hijack
>
> Excellent idea. Maybe something about unsetting 'Reply-To:', as well.
> :)
I had planned to put a lis
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 22:29:05 -0700
Eric Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> Ok, Haywire is list nazi on newbie this week, i'll pipe in here.
I am *always* list Nazi, I just miss some sometimes ;-)
--
HaywireMac
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
+++
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 03:07:51 -0400 (EDT)
Bill Mullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> Excellent idea. Maybe something about unsetting 'Reply-To:', as well.
> :)
*That* drives me even more nuts than hijacking, and waay more nuts
than html, since I never even notice html unless I actually look at
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 00:07, Bill Mullen wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Eric Huff wrote:
>
> > Is there any way to get this sort of thing in the welcome letters? I
> > have to admit, i didn't know about hijacking til the 1st time i turned
> > threading on and saw my own hijack
>
> Excellent i
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Eric Huff wrote:
> Is there any way to get this sort of thing in the welcome letters? I
> have to admit, i didn't know about hijacking til the 1st time i turned
> threading on and saw my own hijack
Excellent idea. Maybe something about unsetting 'Reply-To:', as well. :)
Ok, Haywire is list nazi on newbie this week, i'll pipe in here.
I have seen 3 hijacked threads today.
Please, when you want to start a new thread in a mailing list, click
new.
If you click reply and then change the subject, the email shows up in
the middle of the thread.
Is there any way to g
49 matches
Mail list logo
