On Thursday 13 Nov 2003 10:32 pm, Tango Echo wrote:
> Hello experts,
>
> I orginally posted this question on newbie but didn't
> get a single reply - maybe you guys can help =)
>
> Maybe something in the KDE control panel??? Or "file
> handlers"???
>
Control
gt; Hello experts,
>
> I orginally posted this question on newbie but didn't
> get a single reply - maybe you guys can help =)
>
> Maybe something in the KDE control panel??? Or "file
> handlers"???
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> --
Hello experts,
I orginally posted this question on newbie but didn't
get a single reply - maybe you guys can help =)
Maybe something in the KDE control panel??? Or "file
handlers"???
Thanks in advance
---
Hi all,
I rece
On Saturday 08 November 2003 01:41 pm, Aronsmith wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 09:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > http://www.HImandrake.com/cd_distribution.php
>
> Mega cool
>
> > __
> > Want to buy your Pack or Services from Man
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 16:42, Anton wrote:
> hi
> Thanks for the advice. I now no longer have to change the default route
> in the gateway (linux) routing table. Unfortunately, after trying
> everything I could possibly think of, there is still nothing that makes
> the ME machine able to connect
hi
Thanks for the advice. I now no longer have to change the default route
in the gateway (linux) routing table. Unfortunately, after trying
everything I could possibly think of, there is still nothing that makes
the ME machine able to connect to the net unless I run drakgw. I did
pretty much e
On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 04:17, Richard Urwin wrote:
> On Sunday 05 Oct 2003 3:13 am, Anton wrote:
> > I am trying to set up my mandrake 9.1 box to be the gateway to my
> > recently created network with a single windoze ME machine on the private
> > subnet.
>
> How does the MDK machine link to the In
Just in case it isn't known - the newbie list is still having problems
with dropped posts. I have sent 8 this morning, and only 3 have
appeared.
Anne
--
Registered Linux User No.293302
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft
On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 07:17, Richard Urwin wrote:
> On Sunday 05 Oct 2003 3:13 am, Anton wrote:
> > I am trying to set up my mandrake 9.1 box to be the gateway to my
> > recently created network with a single windoze ME machine on the private
> > subnet.
>
> How does the MDK machine link to the In
On Sunday 05 Oct 2003 3:13 am, Anton wrote:
> I am trying to set up my mandrake 9.1 box to be the gateway to my
> recently created network with a single windoze ME machine on the private
> subnet.
How does the MDK machine link to the Internet? Modem or router? If it is an
ethernet router is it on
in real life tho.. I've heard
about you! :)
-matt
ps - i run nearly the same setup as you are wanting, except with only linux
boxes.
On October 4, 2003 09:13 pm, Anton wrote:
> Sorry but there is a stony silence on newbie... there seems to be a lot
> of polit
On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 09:13, Anton wrote:
> Sorry but there is a stony silence on newbie... there seems to be a lot
> of political traffic though... if this is not the place to be asking the
> sorts of questions I'm asking could someone please direct me to the
> right place?
On Saturday 04 October 2003 23:13, Anton wrote:
> Sorry but there is a stony silence on newbie... there seems to be a lot
> of political traffic though... if this is not the place to be asking the
> sorts of questions I'm asking could someone please direct me to the
> right pl
Sorry but there is a stony silence on newbie... there seems to be a lot
of political traffic though... if this is not the place to be asking the
sorts of questions I'm asking could someone please direct me to the
right place?
Thanks
Anton
Hi,
I am trying to set up my mandrake 9.1 box to b
urpmi rp-pppoe
then as root in a terminal:
adsl-setup
and answer the questions.
rgds
Franki
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Evaristo Ferrari
Sent: Wednesday, 16 July 2003 4:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [expert] newbie - ppp over
Hi,
which is the best way for setting up pppoA with mdk 9.1?
Thanks in advince for any help
Evaristo
--
Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas.
Experience the convenience of buying online with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://shopnow.netscape.com/
Want to buy your Pack or Serv
Forwarded from Newbie.
---
Let Novell know who ya love :-)
http://www.novell.com/linux/
See the poll in the right-most column.
Help get Mandrake on more corporate desktops. (FH)
Miark
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 23:29, Benedetto Gorini wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> could someone please help me to install mdk 9.1 on a Vaio PCG-Z600TEK?
>
> It has an external pcmcia cd-rom.
>
> When I installed mdk 8.1 and 8.2 I had to use a special boot disk called
> pcmcia-vaio-memorystick.img that I found i
Hi Guys,
could someone please help me to install mdk 9.1 on a Vaio PCG-Z600TEK?
It has an external pcmcia cd-rom.
When I installed mdk 8.1 and 8.2 I had to use a special boot disk called
pcmcia-vaio-memorystick.img that I found in the errata page.
With mdk 9.1 there is no equivalent img file.
I
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 17:43, Todd Lyons wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Greg Meyer wrote on Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 03:41:22PM -0500 :
> >
> > And I'll add: Why does Mandrake use one anyway even if it is not required?
>
> Which do you think is easier to support:
>
> A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Meyer wrote on Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 03:41:22PM -0500 :
>
> And I'll add: Why does Mandrake use one anyway even if it is not required?
Which do you think is easier to support:
A) Create an initrd for every install that you do.
B) Create an ini
On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 12:41, Greg Meyer wrote:
> On Saturday 22 March 2003 02:52 pm, Adrian Golumbovici wrote:
> > Thx for the answer mate. Have one more question tho... How do I know if I
> > need a module upon start and how do I create an initrd for the needed
> > modules?
>
> And I'll add: Why
Greg Meyer wrote:
> On Saturday 22 March 2003 02:52 pm, Adrian Golumbovici wrote:
> > Thx for the answer mate. Have one more question tho... How do I know if I
> > need a module upon start and how do I create an initrd for the needed
> > modules?
> And I'll add: Why does Mandrake use one anywa
On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 15:41, Greg Meyer wrote:
> On Saturday 22 March 2003 02:52 pm, Adrian Golumbovici wrote:
> > Thx for the answer mate. Have one more question tho... How do I know if I
> > need a module upon start and how do I create an initrd for the needed
> > modules?
>
> And I'll add: Why
On Saturday 22 March 2003 02:52 pm, Adrian Golumbovici wrote:
> Thx for the answer mate. Have one more question tho... How do I know if I
> need a module upon start and how do I create an initrd for the needed
> modules?
And I'll add: Why does Mandrake use one anyway even if it is not required?
-
> Thx for the answer mate. Have one more question tho... How do I know if I
> need a module upon start and how do I create an initrd for the needed
> modules?
If you're using SCSI or more esoteric boot devices or don't have your
your filesystem type (ext3, reiser) built into the kernel then you ne
- Original Message -
From: "Kwan Lowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] sorry for being a little newbie again, but what
isinitrd?
> On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 14:04, Adrian Golumbovici wrote:
>
On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 14:04, Adrian Golumbovici wrote:
> I saw that some compiled kernels include such a file in the /boot directory
> and also include it in lilo, but others don't put any initrd in the /boot
> directory and also I find no initrd section for them in the lilo. Despite
> the lack of
I saw that some compiled kernels include such a file in the /boot directory
and also include it in lilo, but others don't put any initrd in the /boot
directory and also I find no initrd section for them in the lilo. Despite
the lack of initrd, those kernels still boot and work ok. Can someone
expla
On Sunday 02 March 2003 03:35 pm, Dave Laird wrote:
> Just for the sake of it, would you please post your smb.conf file for
> everyone to examine? This might show others and myself something which
> might cause your problem. Also, if you could, please show the full
> permissions for any given file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Good afternoon...
On Sunday 02 March 2003 09:35 am, Technoslick wrote:
> All boxes are part of the same domain. The Mandrake workstations can see
> the shares and view them, per the authenticity of the user's logon. They
> just can't write to the the
IIRC msec has a reputation for changing ownership/access of a file to
what it likes. You may want to check your proper msec config files to
see if its causing the problem.
Kiran
>On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 11:35, Technoslick wrote:
>
> All boxes are part of the same domain. The Mandrake workstations
On Sunday 02 March 2003 18:46, Technoslick wrote:
> On Sunday 02 March 2003 12:12 pm, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> > As I'm not the guru in this too, I would guess you haven't given access
> > to write for all. AFAIK is win98 not aware of the domain stuff, so it has
> > no problems. But the user from t
On Sunday 02 March 2003 12:12 pm, J. Grant wrote:
> //ps2/now3d /home/now3d/ps2 smbfs users,username=now3d,noauto 0 0
Actually, that's what I already have, but mine is little more subdued. Instead
of "username=" and "password=", I have
"credentials=/etc/samba/auth.." This keeps the
authenticat
On Sunday 02 March 2003 12:12 pm, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> As I'm not the guru in this too, I would guess you haven't given access to
> write for all. AFAIK is win98 not aware of the domain stuff, so it has no
> problems. But the user from the other domain (mdk) belongs to another
> domain so tech
On Sunday 02 March 2003 12:12 pm, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> you have at least 5 machines.
>
> 2 Mandrake
> 2 W2k
> 1 win98se
correct, and the server is Mandrake, as well.
>
> the 2 Mandrake are in one domain. win98se can access the shares of the
> win2k machines. the mandrake machines have only r
Hi,
I am not a samba expert, but could it be as simlpe as smbmount mounts
read-only by default. My /etc/fstab entries for my samba shares have rw set
in the options. I recall having to explicitly set this after install.
something like this should work.
//ps2/now3d /home/now3d/ps2 smbfs users,
On Sunday 02 March 2003 17:53, Technoslick wrote:
> On Sunday 02 March 2003 11:07 am, Greg Meyer wrote:
> > ...could it be as simlpe as smbmount mounts
> > read-only by default. My /etc/fstab entries for my samba shares have rw
> > set in the options. I recall having to explicitly set this after
On Sunday 02 March 2003 11:07 am, Greg Meyer wrote:
> ...could it be as simlpe as smbmount mounts
> read-only by default. My /etc/fstab entries for my samba shares have rw
> set in the options. I recall having to explicitly set this after install.
Thanks for the thought, Greg. I tried this earli
On Sunday 02 March 2003 10:52 am, Technoslick wrote:
> I didn't get any response on my first post to the newbie listserv, so I
> thought I would try once more and cross-post to the expert listserv, as
> well...
>
> Here's the problem: my two MDK 9.0 workstations
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
civileme wrote on Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 05:36:52PM -0900 :
>
> But the ideas always appear when the RC pops up. There are announcements of
> the schedule on cooker list, but every release date approaching seems to
> stimulate creativity.
> So I sugg
Well, RC1 is out and RC2 is probably coming soon.
What is a Release Candidate as opposed to a Beta?
The Beta comes out for the purpose of debugging and ironing out problems with
new features. The release candidate (RC) hits the mirrors when features have
been frozen.
Every cycle we have a num
hi,
take a look at www.kde-look.org and search for splash screens...
bye
Clovis.
Terry Sheltra escreveu:
Hello all,
I sent this to the newbie list a few days ago, and got no response
from anyone. So I thought I'd try here on the expert list. If anyone
out there has any suggestio
uary 2003 4:08 AM
> > > To: Expert List
> > > Subject: Re: [expert] Mandrake Newbie
> > >
> > >
> > > yes the mouse always reappears.
> > >
> > > you can use apmd suspend feature to hybernate.
> >
> > It still uses power :o(
>
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 16:00, Katinka Mills wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of synrat
> > Sent: Wednesday, 12 February 2003 4:08 AM
> > To: Expert List
> > Subject: Re: [expert] Mandr
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of synrat
> Sent: Wednesday, 12 February 2003 4:08 AM
> To: Expert List
> Subject: Re: [expert] Mandrake Newbie
>
>
> yes the mouse always reappears.
>
> you can use
yes the mouse always reappears.
you can use apmd suspend feature to hybernate.
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, James Sparenberg wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 05:47, Katinka Mills wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I use FreeBSD for all my server applications, and Mandrake for my desktop. I
> > have two question
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 05:47, Katinka Mills wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I use FreeBSD for all my server applications, and Mandrake for my desktop. I
> have two questions.
>
> #1 After my laptop suspends, when it wakes up I loose my USB mouse, I looked
> through the archives but could not see any info on
Hi all,
I use FreeBSD for all my server applications, and Mandrake for my desktop. I
have two questions.
#1 After my laptop suspends, when it wakes up I loose my USB mouse, I looked
through the archives but could not see any info on this.
#2 How do I hibernate, I would like to be able to hiberna
Hello all,
I sent this to the newbie list a few days ago, and got no response from
anyone. So I thought I'd try here on the expert list. If anyone out
there has any suggestion for this, please respond to me off-list, as I'm
not subscribed to the list.
Thanks!
Origin
On Sunday 19 January 2003 10:43 am, Charlie wrote:
> Suuure. NOT. Booted to the desktop OK, Sound works unlike beta1, the
> resolution was correct unlike beta1, everything seems to be as it should.
> Except there's no network. It's impossible to make a connection happen
> using Mandrake Control C
Is there a log file I could investigate, or any other way to
troubleshoot this, short of uninstalling kdebase.rpm ?
Maybe it doesn't help, but I suggest you take a look at
.xsession-errors
Unfortunately there is no relevant information in that file.
--
Milos Prudek
Want to buy your Pa
Milos Prudek wrote:
Is there a log file I could investigate, or any other way to
troubleshoot this, short of uninstalling kdebase.rpm ?
Maybe it doesn't help, but I suggest you take a look at
.xsession-errors
in your home directory
Bye
--
Luca Olivetti
Note.- This message reached you today,
After using Mandrake 9.0 with kdm for a month without any problems, kdm
suddenly does not allow any window manager and always runs failsafe window.
It could have happened after unclean shutdown, but I'm using reiserfs
journaling.
I was able to run kdm configuration from KDE control center and cre
Yep,
I suffer from the (lack of) "second cup of coffee syndrome" myself all to
often
Charlie wrote:
> So sorry David. My reply was supposed to have gone in response to windwalker's
> post not to yours! Didn't mean to screw up threading.
>
> I'll have to engage my brain before I start
On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 15:41, Charlie wrote:
> So sorry David. My reply was supposed to have gone in response to windwalker's
> post not to yours! Didn't mean to screw up threading.
My original post was supposed to go to windwalker on the Newbie list;
hence the confusi
On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 13:10, David Rankin wrote:
> Well,
>
> All windows machines store time in LOCALTIME. Linux can store time in
> hwclock in LOCALTIME or UTC/GMT. If you are running a dual boot system with
> windows set the Linux hwclock to LOCALTIME otherwise the clock will be off by
> yo
El jue, 31-10-2002 a las 14:42, Lyvim Xaphir escribió:
> On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 16:05, windwalker wrote:
> > I Installed mandrake.
> > NOW I have to reset taskbar clock twice daily !!
> > its gaining three hours a day..
> > It didnt do that when I only had win 98 on box
> > any thoughts on how to co
So sorry David. My reply was supposed to have gone in response to windwalker's
post not to yours! Didn't mean to screw up threading.
I'll have to engage my brain before I start clicking send.
Apologies;
--
Charlie
Edmonton,AB,Canada
Registered user 244963 at http://counter.li.org
As to the Adj
Time sync (freeware) utilities for Windows (there are quite a few)
http://www.webattack.com/Freeware/misctools/fwtimesync.shtml
Then you shouldn't have to worry about manually setting the clock in either OS
since you received excellent instructions and explanations for Mandrake.
HTH
--
Charli
Well,
All windows machines store time in LOCALTIME. Linux can store time in
hwclock in LOCALTIME or UTC/GMT. If you are running a dual boot system with
windows set the Linux hwclock to LOCALTIME otherwise the clock will be off by
your offset from GMT on one system or the other. (I'll bet your
On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 16:05, windwalker wrote:
> I Installed mandrake.
> NOW I have to reset taskbar clock twice daily !!
> its gaining three hours a day..
> It didnt do that when I only had win 98 on box
> any thoughts on how to correct?
> Mike
I notice a several-hour difference when I go from Ma
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
> make sure the xfs service is running.
>
> run:
> service xfs status
> too see if it's running.
>
> run:
> service xfs start
> if the xfs service is not running.
>
> if this doesn't help there may be a problem with you XF86Config-4 file.
> run "drakx" and reconfigure yo
make sure the xfs service is running.
run:
service xfs status
too see if it's running.
run:
service xfs start
if the xfs service is not running.
if this doesn't help there may be a problem with you XF86Config-4 file.
run "drakx" and reconfigure your X server.
rhp.mac wrote:
>
> --
>
--
De: "rhp.mac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: screen blinking all time/sorry about this question:newbie list can
not help me.
Fecha: lun., 30 sept 2002 14:08
sorry, expert list users,
my monitor blinking black all time.
I am running mandrake 8.2 ppc.
monitor
Hello.
Sorry about cross-posting, but I thought this might be of interest and
benefit for all and I had no desire to repeat myself.
On Wed 2002-09-25 at 21:27:56 -0300, Damian G wrote:
>
> Guys! 9.0 is released.
Really? ;-)
> ( well you probably know this already ;oP )
>
> but since the ser
Many use spam assassin but I know nothing about it. I use an app called
ricochet. In kmail I create filters for spam that pipe it through ricochet.
Ricochet analyzes the spam's headers, determines if the email address is
faked (usually is) and also determines the appropriate abuse contacts f
On September 3, 2002 14:08, John Richard Smith wrote:
> SPAM
>
> We all get it, but is there a good way of dealing with it.
>
> Seems to me I would like to be able to set something up in mozilla
> to send spam to, which either redirects it back to them, or zaps it.
>
> Is there anyway of doing t
On Friday 09 August 2002 02:56 am, Alastair Scott wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Friday 09 Aug 2002 12:29 am, Charlie M. wrote:
> > I'll find a way to update the sucker. I like it so far.
>
> Bad cut and paste by me - the URL above should've been
>
> ftp://newton.m
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002 14:53:31 -0500
nDiScReEt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 July 2002 6:06 am, g wrote:
> > civileme wrote:
> > > Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> > >>I just got this e-mail from a friend
> > >
> > > There was a 7.0 version for 486,
> >
> > nice info.
> > you shot some dreams
On Wednesday 24 July 2002 6:06 am, g wrote:
> civileme wrote:
> > Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> >>I just got this e-mail from a friend
> >
> > There was a 7.0 version for 486,
>
> nice info.
> you shot some dreams, not mine. mainly, saved a lot of time.
> i >had< thoughts of 'make do' with 486 boxes. th
civileme wrote:
>
> Ronald J. Hall wrote:
>
>>I just got this e-mail from a friend
> There was a 7.0 version for 486,
nice info.
you shot some dreams, not mine. mainly, saved a lot of time.
i >had< thoughts of 'make do' with 486 boxes. they will now
be headless controllers. aka, buttons, lights,
civileme wrote:
>
> Ronald J. Hall wrote:
>
>>I just got this e-mail from a friend
> There was a 7.0 version for 486,
nice info.
you shot some dreams, not mine. mainly, saved a lot of time.
i >had< thoughts of 'make do' with 486 boxes. they will now
be headless controllers. aka, buttons, lights,
Hey everyone,
I am posting this question, cause I haven't had any replies to it on the newbie list, I hope it's ok.
I am running LM 8.2, and all my partitions are XFS.
I am also running the system with msec level 5.
The machine's Kernel is : kernel-secure-2.4.18.8
Today I setu
Simple End User Linux
At 11:02 AM 5/21/2002 +0200, you wrote:
>Le Samedi 18 Mai 2002 00:23, vous avez écrit :
>> Randy Kramer wrote:
>> > BTW: No offense intended, but this strikes me as close to a newbie level
>> > question (unless the details that you haven't provid
Le Samedi 18 Mai 2002 00:23, vous avez écrit :
> Randy Kramer wrote:
> > BTW: No offense intended, but this strikes me as close to a newbie level
> > question (unless the details that you haven't provided so far indicate
> > otherwise). What made you post it on "e
Perhaps it would be helpful to rename the two lists: "basic" and "advanced"
instead of "newbie" and "expert" with a published list of topics that might
be considered most suitable for each list. i.e. a "basic" list focusing on
topics tha
well let le do a couple of things with this thread...
1) Top Post...(yea,,, maybe it will kill the thread)
2) it's worth noting that on more than one occasion, in linux related
material, not sponsered by MDK, (like reviews of different distros) I have
seen these two lists as the reason one sho
- Original Message -
From: "Carroll Grigsby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:57 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] newbie vs expert (was Tasks startup time with ps)
> On Friday 17 May 2002 06:29 pm, you wrote:
> > Ra
> On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 09:05 -0400, Hoyt wrote:
> > On Friday 17 May 2002 11:43 pm, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> > > What I do not like are those "list nazis" (while, being a german,
I don't
> > > really appreciate the term) you mentioned.
> >
> > I agree -- using that term for these people does
On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 09:05 -0400, Hoyt wrote:
> On Friday 17 May 2002 11:43 pm, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> > What I do not like are those "list nazis" (while, being a german, I don't
> > really appreciate the term) you mentioned.
>
> I agree -- using that term for these people does a disservic
On Friday 17 May 2002 11:43 pm, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> What I do not like are those "list nazis" (while, being a german, I don't
> really appreciate the term) you mentioned.
I agree -- using that term for these people does a disservice to the real
Nazis. Perhaps we should call them "List Law
On Sat, 18 May 2002 19:48, Alastair Scott wrote:
> > On Sat, 18 May 2002 19:01, you wrote:
> > > Now I'm back and things are better (although not perfect), but I
> > > wonder how many people vowed _never_ to go back after that sort of
> > > treatment?
> >
> > Yeah, thats pretty much why I'm happy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 18 May 2002 10:25 am, Andrew George wrote:
> On Sat, 18 May 2002 19:01, you wrote:
> > Now I'm back and things are better (although not perfect), but I
> > wonder how many people vowed _never_ to go back after that sort of
> > treatment?
On Sat, 18 May 2002 19:01, you wrote:
> Now I'm back and things are better (although not perfect), but I wonder
> how many people vowed _never_ to go back after that sort of treatment?
Yeah, thats pretty much why I'm happy to install and use just about any form
of Linux except Debian...the treat
rching. I asked a few questions, got my head knocked
off, put it back on my shoulders, thought 'well, I'm damned if I'm
being spoken to like that', wiped Mandrake from the PC and went back to
Win2K.
Now I'm back and things are better (although not perfect), but I wonder
e distinction you delineated between
> > newbie and expert list has, over the few years I have been here, pretty
> > much been loss. There are a number of reasons for this to occur. One
> > reason would simply be the subjective nature of differentiating between
> > a "newb
On Sat, 2002-05-18 at 00:16, Charlie wrote:
> >From the perspective of a true newbie (myself); I subscribed to both lists as
> well as various others to learn. I don't often post a response because I
> don't really know or am unsure of the answer that I think I do have.
Friday 17 May 2002 09:43 pm,Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> If there wasn't this last sentence about 'thoughtful responses' I would
> not have bothered to jump in. ;-)
>
> IMHO the lists were just what they were, a list for expert probs and
> issues and a list for newbie
On Fri, 2002-05-17 at 18:29, J. Craig Woods wrote:
> Randy,
>
> Your comments are most germane, and tastefully inserted as an addendum
> in your reply. Unfortunately, the distinction you delineated between
> newbie and expert list has, over the few years I have been here, pre
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 23:57 -0400, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
>
> My choice: Leave things just like they are. (Ain't broke ==> don't fix it).
This is something I definitely agree to!
I snipped the rest of the message but I totally agree with it.
wobo
--
Registered Linux User 228909 Powere
On Friday 17 May 2002 06:29 pm, you wrote:
> Randy Kramer wrote:
> > BTW: No offense intended, but this strikes me as close to a newbie level
> > question (unless the details that you haven't provided so far indicate
> > otherwise). What made you post it on "e
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 17:29 -0500, J. Craig Woods wrote:
> Randy Kramer wrote:
> >
> > BTW: No offense intended, but this strikes me as close to a newbie level
> > question (unless the details that you haven't provided so far indicate
> > otherwise). What made
It could be argued that all questions are newbie if we were all
really experts.. we wouldn't be asking questions would we?
James
On Fri, 17 May 2002 17:29:02 -0500
"J. Craig Woods" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Randy Kramer wrote:
> >
> > BTW: No o
Randy Kramer wrote:
>
> BTW: No offense intended, but this strikes me as close to a newbie level
> question (unless the details that you haven't provided so far indicate
> otherwise). What made you post it on "expert"? Again, no offense, and
> I don't consi
elp
Gavin
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: [newbie] can't update from local directory
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 00:06:21 +0900
From: Gavin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm using 8.0 and I downloaded the updates via ftp rpmfind.net to my local
directory, when
I have a single machine, no local network, with a broadband (cable modem)
connection. Using msec,level 3, which uses a default umask of 022.
Is there any reason to create a perm.local file rather than simply edit the
settings in the /usr/share/msec/perm.xx files? I want to chan
> >Hello all
> >
> >I'm new to iptables, (and no hotshot with Linux, either), so I'm hoping
> >someone can point me in a good direction for some docs on iptables
basics -
> >I just need to get it to accept tcp packets from port 6000, and I don't
know
> >the necessary voodoo.
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >
"Mitchell, Edmund" wrote:
>
> Hello all
>
> I'm new to iptables, (and no hotshot with Linux, either), so I'm hoping
> someone can point me in a good direction for some docs on iptables basics -
> I just need to get it to accept tcp packets from port 6000, and I don't know
> the necessary voodoo.
I've mentioned this before, but you might also want to check out some
example firewalling scripts which would probably enlighten you a bit
more than just simply reading the iptables documentation. There are
some good ones here:
http://www.linuxguruz.org/iptables
Probably the one that I lik
1 - 100 of 597 matches
Mail list logo
