Jews do NOT have to register in the Ukraine. I already told you that. Why are
you repeating it?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
and you are ignoring the violence inthe Ukraine, the fact that Jews now have
to register and all that???
Yes, the first part. I doubt he had coming back by choice post-ignorance in
mind, though. Or at least it wasn't implied by that quip.
Welcome back, by the way.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
This stuff is confusing - I meant that someone who is ignorant [of his basic
nature
I think by "ignorant" he meant not enlightened, not "off the wheel." One of his
better bons mots.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Makes sense - the process is not uniquely human, just that we can apprehend
it, and become aware of it, during our time as humans. So there must come
In case anybody was confused, I was not suggesting that "Reincarnation is for
the ignorant" was the only way he said it.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I have heard he said it many different ways.
(snip)
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Just to be picky,
Just to be picky, "I don't believe in it" can mean either "I don't believe it
exists" or "I'm opposed to it." If you're opposed to abortion, you might well
say, "I don't believe in abortion."
Anyway, what I heard that he said was "Reincarnation is for the ignorant,"
which is better than eithe
Comments below...
The flipside, of course, is why you care?
I met you online what, 15-20 years ago? You weren't as anti-TM as you appear
to be now, even though you made clear that you no longer practiced it.
What changed?
Nothing changed, because I wasn't "anti-TM" then, and am not no
the higher levels of our subject integrity on this Fairfieldlife list we do
keep moderators on hand to guard and protect us as a community from spammers.
We all should be on guard to report spam like that post to the Moderation here
to keep track of.
Thank you for your concern,
-Buck
you for your concern,
-Buck
authfriend writes:
GET OFF IT, BUCK. You know who raunchy is; you know it isn't "spam"; and you
know we're free to post anything here that others may find of interest, and
that most certainly includes net neutrality Stop trying to intimid
ck might condone censorship of some kind.
On Tuesday, May 6, 2014 10:55 AM, "authfriend@..." wrote:
GET OFF IT, BUCK. You know who raunchy is; you know it isn't "spam"; and you
know we're free to post anything here that others may find of interest, and
If it says "Spring Water" or "Artesian Water" on the label, then it's required
to be spring or artesian water, not tap water. There are many reasons to avoid
bottled water, but not being able to tell whether it's tap water isn't one of
them (assuming you can read).
> I love, love, love, love
GET OFF IT, BUCK. You know who raunchy is; you know it isn't "spam"; and you
know we're free to post anything here that others may find of interest, and
that most certainly includes net neutrality Stop trying to intimidate would-be
posters who don't know any better into thinking they can only p
Maybe so, but that wasn't my point and has nothing to do with my point.
The point is, these fanatics are also lunatics.
Most of these god-men are also mad-men.
--- wrote :
Of course, as far as Barry is concerned, all those who don't agree with him
that human beings are insignificant
Of course, as far as Barry is concerned, all those who don't agree with him
that human beings are insignificant have been and always will be fanatics whom
history will remember as "tyrants and killers."
From: Share Long
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 2:0
And others, of course, own their own computers and set their own work
schedules. I don't recall ever having seen you mention them.
For a very select few, all they have to do is get up early in the morning,
brew some coffee in the kitchen, and then walk down the hall to their home
office and
Weird, I was just having the same kinds of thoughts a few minutes ago while
reading a piece in the NYTimes titled "Cosmic Connections in the Deep Sea"
about the author's experience diving. It mentions the issue only in passing,
but it triggered a "Wait a minnit" sort of response.
It occurred
Click "Show message history," dumbass. That's what it's for.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 5/5/2014 7:19 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
Jason, don't try to teach your grandmother to suck eggs. >
Would it be too much of a pr
Jason, I'm sorry you feel like a piglet. But I was obviously not trying to draw
you into an argument but rather suggesting you butt out. You didn't add
anything helpful; most of what you said was irrelevant to what Curtis and I
were discussing; some of it repeated what I've been saying as if you
Jason, don't try to teach your grandmother to suck eggs.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
> > > --- wrote :
> > > I still think you're painting with too broad a brush when you use the
> > > term "society." Some elements of society take the position you desc
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I still think you're painting with too broad a brush when you use the term
"society." Some elements of society take the position you describe, but others
do not.
C: Seems like a reasonable objec
And Barry, of course, is Oh-So-Superior to us poor benighted less-than-human
losers who missed it.
No "hierarchy" there, nope nope nope.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
...or human.
These are a few moments of one of the "unsung heroes" of the Grateful Dead
finally bei
The "Jewish registration" story turns out to have been what amounts to a hoax,
Michael. A flyer with the announcement that Jews must register was distributed
in one town in the Ukraine by three masked gunmen, but nobody has been able to
determine where it originated--certainly not from Putin. In
Comments below...
Bingo. One of the things that I don't think a number of theists or
quasi-theists or theists-in-denial-that-they're-theists
Oh, you forgot to list the nontheists, like moi.
don't "get" on this forum is that what they call atheists barging into an
otherwise pleasant c
To demean points of view he disagrees with is high on Barry's list of personal
values.
Er, I mean, preferences...
Rhetorical question. No need to reply. I was just amused that neither you nor
Share can conceive of having a preference without the presence of some kind of
hierarchy. I
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
My guess is that having preferences or hierarchies is hard wired into us for
survival value.
I disagree. I see nothing wrong with preference or believing in hierarchies,
but I definitely don't
Comments below...
Because the thing is, humans, at a fundamental level, cannot prefer or value
more highly, what they even unconsciously hold as detrimental.
Nonsense. People do this all the time, continue behaviors that they consciously
*know* are detrimental to them. Their position within an
Not to mention, we have no idea what the relative percentages are of TMers who
commit suicide versus those in the general population. For all we know, the
percentage of TMers could be smaller. Certainly suicidal TMers tend to draw
more attention because it's so contrary to what TM promises. But
I still think you're painting with too broad a brush when you use the term
"society." Some elements of society take the position you describe, but others
do not.
And the negative reaction to criticism from atheists has a great deal to do
with its hostility quotient. Simple disagreement doesn'
Actually, this distinction is pretty elementary with regard to neuroscientific
studies; it really isn't something that has just never occurred to the
researchers. Libet's studies, for example, looked directly at the apparent time
lag between decisions made on the unconscious level and when they
Curtis, you way overstate the case. In this country, at least, there's oodles
of criticism of biblical ideas, including ideas at the heart of Christian
belief. Ever heard of the Jesus Seminar? And a currently popular book, "How
Jesus Became God," maintains that the idea of Jesus as God developed
Comments below...
From a sociological POV this question has vast implications, and always has,
in how we approach society's sense of justice in our legal system. It wasn't
long ago that we hanged an elephant for killing a man. Today we have people on
death row who were not mentally able t
sive bullshit when it had something to do with Robin. But this was
before my time here so I am conjecturing based on having read some old posts
just previous to my showing up here.
On Friday, May 2, 2014 8:20 AM, "authfriend@..." wrote:
I hope you're not alluding to me, Curt
Barry on some of
his abusive bullshit when it had something to do with Robin. But this was
before my time here so I am conjecturing based on having read some old posts
just previous to my showing up here.
On Friday, May 2, 2014 8:20 AM, "authfriend@..." wrote:
I hope you're
FWIW, Maharishi said at one point, "Bliss isn't blissful." By which he meant, I
assume, that to experience blissfulness required some degree of waking-state
consciousness. IOW, you wouldn't experience blissfullness in
transcendental-consciousness-by-itself--but you would be in a state of bliss b
Okey-doke, glad to hear it. I don't recall anyone trying to stick you with
Barry's perspective on Lenz's alleged levitation exploits, though, "previous
poster" or otherwise (it wasn't entirely clear what "previous poster" meant--it
could have referred to a poster not involved in the current disc
old hag, so are you.
Sorta like the way you're trying to barge into a pleasant conversation that
doesn't concern you and trying to turn it into an argument of some kind? What a
pathetic old hag you are, Judy.
From: "authfriend@..."
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.c
What happened here??
-
Harris:
"Given the degree to which religion still inspires human conflict, and impedes
genuine inquiry, I believe that merely being a self-described “Buddhist” is to
be complicit in the world’s violence and ignorance to an unacceptable degree".
- See more at:
http:/
s discussed.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Christopher Hitchens would agree with him if Barry were to say such a thing.
--------
On Fri, 5/2/14, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@...> wrote:
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: R
Nobody ever disputed this point with Barry, including those who believe in
determinism. He could never quite understand how someone could believe in
determinism and yet continue to act as if they had free will without serious
cognitive dissonance. He was unable to grasp that believers in determi
Right. You just regularly barge into such discussions, announcing that there is
no God and that anyone who believes there is is worse than a fool.
Although I fully understand that some people get off on debating the existence
of God and things like that, *nothing bores me more* these da
I hope you're not alluding to me, Curtis, because if you are, this would be a
seriously misleading way of putting it. Verging on deceptive, in fact.
A previous poster was also a big fan of trying to hold me accountable for
Barry's perspective. What is with you guys? Can't keep yer eye on
o need to wait; the photo you want is the very one you've been stupidly
ragging on.
:-)
From: "authfriend@..."
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 9:21 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: RIP Bob Hoskins
Well, that would actually be a
Well, that would actually be all of your talk about such faces, Barry.
BTW, below is a photo of Hoskins in his late 30s.
With all of this talk recently of faces that "show their age," it is sad to
bid farewell to one that never did.
Bob Hoskins was a journeyman actor, as comf
I'm happy to report that I have never seen your dick, Barry, but if you say
it's tiny, I'll take your word for it.
Hey Jude...if your panties are this twisted, you and Ann might want to switch
over to comments about how tiny my dick is. That would fit in better with you
gals' obvious
n
what someone looks like exposes a certain, well, deficit in the ability to come
up with meaningful criticism of the person's participation. It says far more
about them than it does about the object of their disapprobation.
On 4/29/2014 1:23 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote
n. It says far more
about them than it does about the object of their disapprobation.
On 4/29/2014 1:23 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
Actually, as you know, Richard, I did post a photo of "my own face" a few
years ago (along with "Barry's Fantasy Image
paradise" - Adolf Hitler
----
On Tue, 4/29/14, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@...> wrote:
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Nazi Cult Mentality
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, April 29, 2014
oman. What's less acceptable is being
an ugly old woman and being completely unaware of it. That implies either never
having looked in a mirror or being a vampire, and unable to see her own image
in it. :-)
From: "authfriend@..."
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tues
Actually, as you know, Richard, I did post a photo of "my own face" a few years
ago (along with "Barry's Fantasy Image of Judy"). It's in the Members section.
That's the one azgray is referring to. Apparently he believes he's the only one
who can see it, so he feels safe in describing it as what
Fascinating, Michael, that you would see this comment as describing TMers
(presumably TB TMers).
TMers generally are fairly well educated, first of all. And if they didn't
"question the world around them," they would be unlikely to become committed to
TM to start with, given that TM is promot
Thanks, Steve.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Based on that picture of her, I'd say it's pretty accurate.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Rather that admit the effects of all those years of cigarettes and seething
anger, she calls herself “a fairly nice-lo
Er, Salyavin, there are plenty of David Lynch fans who aren't TMers. (Not to
mention TMers who aren't David Lynch fans, like moi.)
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Share, Nabby is motivated here by the fact that Lynch does TM. Whether you are
on his side spiritually is his prim
You mean, this one?
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/photos/albums/408557067/lightbox/1672927237?orderBy=ordinal&sortOrder=asc
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/photos/albums/408557067/lightbox/1672927237?orderBy=ordinal&sortOrder=asc
---In FairfieldLife@ya
OK, looks like Rick was referring to Tredwell's specific claims, whatever they
are. Still, to point out that Amma has a lot of critics is hardly to "cast
aspersions" on her; it's just a matter of fact.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Except, of course, for the fact that Nabby is
Except, of course, for the fact that Nabby is right. We've been hearing
complaints about Amma here on FFL for years. I believe there's even an
anti-Amma Yahoo Group. So it really is a little odd to see Rick saying
Tredwell's is a "lone voice."
Maybe Rick didn't express himself clearly; perhap
"Clever" is not another word for "perfect," dumbass.
In other words, it was "perfect." I rest my case. :-) :-) :-)
From: "authfriend@..."
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 6:03 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re
Lenz may well have been interviewed by Hard Copy at some point, but the
reporter in the wheelchair was crack journalist John Hockenberry interviewing
Lenz on Dateline NBC. When I saw the tapes, I couldn't believe how phony Lenz
came across.
Just as an aside: If one isn't a terminal tightass,
He probably didn't know what "snake oil" was, but I wouldn't put it past him to
have been familiar with the term (he loved playing with idioms) and set the
reporter up. If the reporter had defined it differently--"Snake oil is a fake
panacea"--he'd have had a smart-ass response to that instead.
What a crashingly stupid paragraph. There were, of course (as Barry knows),
umpty obits published after MMY died. As I recall, quite a few of them were
posted or linked to here. Some were biased negatively, some were biased
positively, some were nicely balanced. I probably did critique one of th
I wouldn't call his answers "enlightened wisdom," but a lot of them are clever
and funny. One would have to be a real sourpuss not to find them charming, even
if one were a True Unbeliever.
Barry hasn't had the chance to spill his bile for three whole days. Expect a
veritable flood in the wee
Seems like there's a limited number of things that can be done with bulls. What
happens to male buffalo, for example? They can't each have their own herd of
females, and you can't have a herd of males, can you? They'd kill each other.
I'm serious; I really don't know. Something in nature must
Not quite true, Alex. One of the males is featured here:
http://www.universalfields.org/tala_ram.html
http://www.universalfields.org/tala_ram.html
Doesn't sound like he's going to end up as veal chops, but perhaps he's the
exception. At any rate, the text sounds very respectful and protect
Those sure are some gorgeous Jerseys they've got. They make the huge hulking
Holsteins that supply supermarket milk look like ungainly monsters. (Not the
Holsteins' fault; they were bred that way to give as much milk as possible. But
it isn't anywhere as good as milk from Jerseys.)
A
He knows that, Lawson. He's trolling.
The Raj is in the USA. We're talking about the Maharishi AYurveda facility in
India that the press says is worth $1.5 billion US.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 4/27/2014 4:29 AM, LEnglish5@... mailto:LEnglish5@... wrote:
> The pla
Actually, Episcopalianism (Anglicanism) is Protestant. But it "looks" too
Catholic for some fundamentalists and other Protestants to be comfortable with
it.
My parents both came from long lines of Presbyterians. Although they weren't
at all religious, they were scandalized when my father's br
Also, Episcopalianism in the U.S. is the same as Anglicanism in the U.K.,
except it isn't subject to the British monarch.
Not clear whether Richard is just trolling, but of course Anglicanism is not
subject to the pope. That's kind of its raison d'etre, in fact.
You do realize tha
Not clear whether Richard is just trolling, but of course Anglicanism is not
subject to the pope. That's kind of its raison d'etre, in fact.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 4/26/2014 10:09 AM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
You do realize that vast majori
Really? She'd file for divorce just because something's wrong with the
marriage? How petty!
Judy,
We still don't know if this story is true or not.
Yes, that's why I said "most likely possibility" and "almost certainly just a
dumb rumor." Are any of those words unfamiliar to you?
Most likely possibility: She isn't pregnant. This is a story from the National
Enquirer. It's almost certainly just a dumb rumor, tabloid B.S.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Anything is possible in any marriage these days. Gay or straight.
http://www.inquisitr.com/1225474/
Oh, OK, thought you were being sarcastic.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Sorry, but Edg's right:
I know, that's why I said yeah...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=naSZBdJoEbM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=naSZBdJ
Sorry, but Edg's right:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=naSZBdJoEbM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=naSZBdJoEbM
Courtesy snopes.com:
http://www.snopes.com/photos/airplane/onewing.asp
http://www.snopes.com/photos/airplane/onewing.asp
(Actually, the Snopes.com cite is courtesy one of
Good one, Share!
Wow! thanks, salyavin
PS I'd say this is one way that balls can be used to prove the existence of God
(-:
On Friday, April 25, 2014 5:53 AM, salyavin808
wrote:
Pendulum Waves https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVkdfJ9PkRQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVkdfJ9
yahoogroups.com, wrote :
From: "authfriend@..."
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 9:54 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The World's Highest Ranking Alien Believer
Ooops. Looks like I pushed a few more of Barry's buttons.
It makes him absol
Ooops. Looks like I pushed a few more of Barry's buttons.
It makes him absolutely crazy that I'm actually a fairly nice-looking dame
rather than the hideous hag of his nightmares.
In many cases what people say about your face is more devastating than turning
it into a caricature. We see pol
Barry's linked to that "Barry's fantasy image of Judy" photo at least a dozen
times since I posted it (and at one point he did a Photoshop job making it
appear to be a huge crop circle). Talk about obsession!
Admittedly, the photo was an afterthought. If anybody wants to see what I look
like w
posted it seven years ago.
It's haunted his dreams ever since.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
From: "authfriend@..."
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 12:01 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The World's Highest Ranking Alien Bel
Willytex is only pretending, but I certainly am an ET. Just ask Barry. Why do
you think I freak him out so badly?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I am perfectly willing to believe that WillyTex and possbily Judy are indeed
ET's.
On
Share, were you in the Reply window when you tried to do the edit?
What's "File Edit"?
I have no trouble editing in Neo.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Richard, I just attempted to edit your post in Neo. I highlighted what i
wanted to edit. When I hit backspace, nothing
Oh, for crying out loud, Michael. This is just as extreme, and just as
laughably unrealistic, as the effusions of the blissninniest TM TB.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Nope this WAS the plan all along - to use the idea of enlightenment and
whatever else would sell to ge
"Better is death in one's own dharma; the dharma of another brings
danger."--3:35, Maharishi's translation
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Buck, it isn't everyone's dharma to be meditating more and as it says in the
Gita, the dharma of another, though higher, brings danger. Bett
For once I completely agree with Barry: the guy is positively icky.
But then, that's what I thought about Fred Lenz too. (Maybe even ickier given
that he was better looking.)
Run away! Run away!
When it comes to Girish Varma, IMO anyone who couldn't just look at photos of
him
Projection, as I just pointed out.
This is a person who actually believed Robin Carlsen was bright and
charismatic and worth following as a spiritual teacher. >
As opposed to Barry who actually believed Fred Lenz was bright enough to turn
huge halls golden and worth following as a spiritual t
oopsie!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I'll reply just because it's perversely pleasing to see Judy trying to steal
someone else's funny insult because she's incapable of thinking up her own.
She's been reduced to "I know she is, but so are you!&qu
Actually, the "fire hydrant" analogy is a perfect one for Barry's near-total
ignorance of metaphyics. (As well as of Robin.)
Discussions of God and theology make Barry very nervous; that's why he's
especially irritable and gratuitously nasty this morning.
But what do you think of the me
Just out of curiosity, Barry, when have I "tried to appear technical" without
having a clue? Let's have an example.
You're "pulling a Judy," Share, and trying to appear technical while having
nary a clue.
Bar, you have NO IDEA how transparent your mind is.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
From: "authfriend@..."
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What are the *benefits* of believing in God?
Barry was taking a shot at me because he assumed I'd started the God argument
in this exchange (not having read the whole thing, as usual).
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Hey, Salyavin, you and I were talking about paranormal r
Me in blue...
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Hey, Salyavin, you and I were talking about paranormal research in this
exchange, remember? You brought God into it, not me.
I think God is quite paranormal and Ed Fess usually
Barry has always been...uh...metaphysically challlenged. ;-)
Hey, Bar, "metaphysical ultimacy" isn't an argument, unprovable or otherwise.
It's just a technical term. Relax.
You mean unprovable arguments like "metaphysical ultimacy?" I'm sorry, but
that strikes me as a made-up phrase desi
Hey, Salyavin, you and I were talking about paranormal research in this
exchange, remember? You brought God into it, not me.
BTW, the light green type you're using now is so faint it's really hard to
read. Please pick something darker.
Again, speaking just for myself, I have no problem
Xenosophistry: you can't beat it.
Metaphysical ultimacy = divine simplicity. Being Itself. Doesn't get much
simpler than that.
Quantum mechanics, most successful theory in the history of science. And the
simple formula that everyone can understand is...?
“Do not keep saying to yourself
More comments below (in blue).
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Comments below...
> One reason I don't rule paranormal stuff out is that I'm not convinced
> science knows how to test for some of it. I could not possibly disagre
Summary!
my own summery
This sounds like one of Barry's paranoid fantasies--that Steve, by his own
admission, wants to "force" atheists to be uncomfortable. There's zero
indication of that in what Steve wrote. He lists some possible future
scientific developments that he speculates might make an atheist uncomfortable
Depends on whether you say something nefarious, Curtis. Maybe you're just too
entrenched in the behavior to change.
Interesting that you can't acknowledge anything I wrote in this post. Doesn't
bode well, but we'll see.
Here's Feser's post on classical theism, the one you said was a good s
What are the implications? For the nature of consciousness, perhaps for
reincarnation?
First paragraph of an excerpt from the book "Struck By Genius: How a Brain
Injury Made Me a Mathematical Marvel"
http://www.amazon.com/Struck-Genius-Injury-Mathematical-Marvel/dp/0544045602/?tag=saloncom08
I imagine
*pop* will be bringing in the *take-out*.
On Sunday, April 20, 2014 2:36 PM, "authfriend@..." wrote:
Mike, a minute ago she scooted out of the nest carrying something fairly
substantial in her beak that she apparently deposited outside somewhere.
Couldn't see what it
It occurs to me that I should make this additional point: If Curtis can
effectively deal with the classical theism argument, he'll have done precisely
what I said those who wish to debunk theism should do: address the strongest
argument for it.
If he does this well and responsibly, with intel
Mike, a minute ago she scooted out of the nest carrying something fairly
substantial in her beak that she apparently deposited outside somewhere.
Couldn't see what it was; could it have been the remains of the carcass she was
feeding the chicks? Was she housecleaning?
Dinnertime's over; she'
Oh, she's feeding them, right this instant! Hubby must have brought some grub.
Shame there's no microphone; it would be fun to hear their peeps. They look
like they're making quite a racket. Little pure white puffballs!
http://www.pacast.com/players/falcon.asp
http://www.pacast.com/players/fa
Hate to say it, Salyavin, but it looks like somebody messed with your gal.
Here's a photo of the same British Museum sculpture from Wikipedia:
She doesn't look at all disgruntled in this photo. Wha' hoppen?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yaho
1 - 100 of 25648 matches
Mail list logo
