On Nov 13, 2005, at 11:49 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 13, 2005, at 10:46 AM, Jason Spock wrote:
Why does the TM-org rabidly criticise Deepak Chopra and Sri
Sri. Ravishankar.?? TM-governors claim MMY called him Sugar-
call me fanatic or not,
thats the point!
Râm
Frank Lotz
From: Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 06:02:50 -0500
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earth turns around
the sun not the other way: (How MMY sold a diamond
(TM) for a handful of spinach...)
I
On Nov 14, 2005, at 7:20 AM, Peter wrote:Yes, yes, it's all so true. SSRS is a fraud. Thank God we all know that now. Spending all that time with MMY from the age of 12 onwards must have had some sort of impact on him. IT IS SO TRUE THAT, "MEDITATORS SHOULD WATCH OUT FOR SWEET POISON." I don't
since.
From: "Peter" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 04:20:21 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earth turns around the sun not the other way: (How MMY sold a diamond (TM) for a handful of spinach...)
Yes, yes, it's all so true. SSRS is a fraud. Thank Godwe all kno
: Earth turns around
the sun not the other way: (How MMY sold a diamond
(TM) for a handful of spinach...)
Yes, yes, it's all so true. SSRS is a fraud.
Thank God
we all know that now. Spending all that time with
MMY
from the age of 12 onwards must have had some sort
of
impact
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 14, 2005, at 7:20 AM, Peter wrote:
Yes, yes, it's all so true. SSRS is a fraud. Thank God
we all know that now. Spending all that time with MMY
from the age of 12 onwards must have had some sort of
impact on
--- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 14, 2005, at 7:20 AM, Peter wrote:
Yes, yes, it's all so true. SSRS is a fraud. Thank
God
we all know that now. Spending all that time with
MMY
from the age of 12 onwards must have had some sort
of
impact on him. IT IS SO TRUE THAT,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 14, 2005, at 7:20 AM, Peter wrote:
Yes, yes, it's all so true. SSRS is a fraud. Thank God
we all know that now. Spending all that
On Nov 14, 2005, at 9:36 AM, sparaig wrote: Well, a warning about a technique isn't the same as referring to SSRS himself as sweet poison, which was what I was questioning. As was I, but that might not have been obvious to a careless reader.Since none of this is dated or given a clear reference
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 14, 2005, at 9:36 AM, sparaig wrote:
Well, a warning about a technique isn't the same as referring to
SSRS himself as sweet poison, which was what I was questioning.
As was I, but that might not have been obvious
On Nov 14, 2005, at 10:13 AM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 14, 2005, at 9:36 AM, sparaig wrote: Well, a warning about a technique isn't the same as referring to SSRS himself as sweet poison, which was what I was questioning. As was
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
As noted, Shankar had broken with the TMO sometime not
long prior to 1994, so the sweet poison warning
would have had to have been
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 14, 2005, at 10:13 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 14, 2005, at 9:36 AM, sparaig wrote:
Well, a warning about a technique isn't the same as referring to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Hagen J. Holtz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even if you may consider me as somehow arrogant, but I allow
myself to tell
you that I would like to open your eyes a little bit now. First of
all I
have already been an independent mind before, while and after
c Tradition, whether you call me fanatic or not, thats the point!
Râm
Frank Lotz
From: "Vaj" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 06:02:50 -0500 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earth turns around the sun not the other way: (How MMY sold a diamond (TM) for a handful of spinach...)
I as
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 13, 2005, at 11:49 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 13, 2005, at 10:46 AM, Jason Spock wrote:
Why does the TM-org rabidly criticise Deepak
.
From: Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 06:02:50 -0500
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earth turns around the sun not the
other way: (How MMY sold a diamond (TM) for a handful of spinach...)
I assumed he was talking about SSRS. Perhaps Jason can clarify
who this comment
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 14, 2005, at 9:36 AM, sparaig wrote:
Well, a warning about a technique isn't the same as referring to
SSRS
himself as sweet poison, which was what I was questioning.
As was I, but that might not have been
on 11/14/05 2:34 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure. I was just wondering at the claim since MMY has carefully
refrained, as far as I know, from criticizing Chopra. If he won't
criticize Chopra who was far closer to him emotionally than SSRS ever
was, as far as I know,
How could
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure. I was just wondering at the claim since MMY
has carefully
refrained, as far as I know, from criticizing
Chopra. If he won't
criticize Chopra who was far closer to him
emotionally than SSRS ever
was, as far as I know, it seemed very strange
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 11/14/05 2:34 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure. I was just wondering at the claim since MMY has carefully
refrained, as far as I know, from criticizing Chopra. If he won't
criticize Chopra who was
on 11/14/05 11:10 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 11/14/05 2:34 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure. I was just wondering at the claim since MMY has carefully
refrained, as far as I know, from
I completely disagree with your analys simply because TM isn't
necessary repetition at all.
-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Hagen J. Holtz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The way I heard the story, it was the Shankaracharya, or the
guy
MMY was
propping up as the Shankaracharya (I
D]
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 9:31
AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earth turns around the
sun not the other way: (How MMY sold a diamond (TM) for a handful of
spinach...)
I completely disagree with your analys simply because TM isn't
necessa
Someone else wrote it, Vajranatha. Some Charlie who rarely posts
---OriginalMessage--
From: "Vaj" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 11:47:37 -0500 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Earth turns around the sun not the other way: (How MMY sold
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 13, 2005, at 10:46 AM, Jason Spock wrote:
The Siddhis are the logic consequence out of TM. Look into the
Samyama-principle: Dharana (fixing), dhyana (gliding) and
samadhi (landing). These three parameters
5 17:09:38 - Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earth turns around the sun not the other way: (How MMY sold a diamond (TM) for a handful of spinach...)
And the Masters of the Himalayas, is so right. I had a lot of "Sidhi experiences" as a child and grown-up, living in silence in the for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Himalayan masters have outdated ideas.
Just a single guy manages to float in the air,.. John Hagelin
will be the next president of United States of America.
And if just one monkey flies out my ass,
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earth turns around the sun not the other way: (How MMY sold a diamond (TM) for a handful of spinach...)
on 11/13/05 11:19 AM, Jason Spock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Himalayan masters have outdated ideas.
Just a single guy manages to float in the air
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 11/13/05 11:23 AM, akasha_108 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Himalayan masters have outdated ideas.
Just a single
I think you are sorely mistaken. I don't think many would even take
notice of someone floating in the air. I mean who cares, really? What
does it have to do with the bulk of people's lives who are primarily
concerned with such mundane things like:
*earning a living
*paying for food
*health
Probably most people wouldn't believe it. There are some amazing magic
tricks out there, like guys walking through plate glass windows. People know
it's a trick even though they can't imagine how it's done. People would
assume the same with levitation, even if were done in their living room.
David
Kenny H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*also trying to rewrite the tax code and screw people out of their
mortgage deduction
And who is getting screwed out of thier mortgage deduction? Under the
proposal, the average home owner will maintian their full
deductiblity. And those who are unable to
Maybe to most of what you have written
However, I don't consider $350,000+ for an 800-1000 sq. foot 2 br/1
bath bungalow (here in Sacramento) in a lousy neighborhood
affordable. Go a few blocks over and the same houses are already at
half a million. Go a bit further south towards the Bay Area or
I know, California real estate is unreal (literally IMO and is not
stable at current levels.) Thats one reason I left the state, having
been born, raised, educated and careered there. Housing prices are
just in fairyland compared to many other nice areas. And with
broadband internet being most
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I know, California real estate is unreal (literally IMO and is not
stable at current levels.) Thats one reason I left the state,
having
been born, raised, educated and careered there. Housing prices are
just in
jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just looking at housing prices in my neighborhood in Santa
Clara, Cal. which is a middle-class neighborhood, but nothing ritzy-
Many retired folks, some families and couples. Houses are typically
single story, about 50 years old, 1200 to 1500
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 13, 2005, at 10:46 AM, Jason Spock wrote:
Why does the TM-org rabidly criticise Deepak Chopra and Sri
Sri. Ravishankar.?? TM-governors claim MMY called him Sugar-
Caned
poison.??
Duh. One word:
on 11/13/05 10:49 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 13, 2005, at 10:46 AM, Jason Spock wrote:
Why does the TM-org rabidly criticise Deepak Chopra and Sri
Sri. Ravishankar.?? TM-governors claim MMY
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 11/13/05 10:49 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 13, 2005, at 10:46 AM, Jason Spock wrote:
Why does the TM-org
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just looking at housing prices in my neighborhood in Santa
Clara, Cal. which is a middle-class neighborhood, but nothing
ritzy-
Many retired folks, some families
41 matches
Mail list logo
