--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(snip)
> > One end of the spectrum is silent me-less
> > knowing and the
> > other end is dynamic intellectual interaction which
> > I would say is
> > part of the process of
--- Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It just seemed to be an awful lot of chatter about
> > something that is quite simple. It was in serious
> > jest. Be still (ala Ramana Maharishi)
> >
>
> Chatter? Oh dear
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It just seemed to be an awful lot of chatter about
> something that is quite simple. It was in serious
> jest. Be still (ala Ramana Maharishi)
>
Chatter? Oh dear, now I am insulted :). Peter baby, that's what this
It just seemed to be an awful lot of chatter about
something that is quite simple. It was in serious
jest. Be still (ala Ramana Maharishi)
--- Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (snipped it)
>
> > Rick, you need t
bject: [FairfieldLife] Re:
Individuality: Outward Projection vs. Inner Subjective Sense of No Indiv.
Do
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
Peter Sutphen<[EMAIL PROTECTED]...> wrote:> p.s.
Try not using your mantra for several days. Many> peoples minds have
incorporated the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(snipped it)
> Rick, you need to visit Ramana Maharishi.
>
Peter, I am beginning to think that you do not understand what I am
talking about. Oh well, it wouldn't be the first time...maybe you
need to visit Raman
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> p.s. Try not using your mantra for several days. Many
> peoples minds have incorporated the mantra into their
> chit and it just creates more noise. Notice how you
> don't transcend anymore like you used to?
> Self-Inq
interesting part about the samscaries...I'll have to give it a try
again and see what is left.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The mind really quiets down quickly.and then can
> becomes completely still. It is a very, powerful
> process. It bu
The mind really quiets down quickly.and then can
becomes completely still. It is a very, powerful
process. It burns out samskaras much faster than a
mantra, but it won't produce much bliss like TM, but
it will create incredible mental clarity/stillness.
--- jim_flanegin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
I remember trying this when you mentioned it a few weeks ago and it
is a neat experience- a pleasant relief from all the relative
functioning.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Self-Inquire. Sit quietly and place your attention on
> your sense of "
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SNIP
> In every single case where someone has claimed to enlightened a
la "TM"
> their View (their inner POV/cosmology) matched precisely the vague
> definitions MMY has given, often slightly embellished with a
> sprinkling o
--- Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >We are discussing here (I thought) how a thinking
> > > process could be going on without the
--- anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > If, on the other hand, the daily experience is
> that "there is no
> I" doing anything. Things just happen, as they
> should.
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogrou
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > If, on the other hand, the daily experience is that "there is no
I" doing anything. Things just happen, as they should.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "as they shoul
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >We are discussing here (I thought) how a thinking
> > process could be going on without the indweller doing that
thinking.
>
> Your assumption
e] Re:
Individuality: Outward Projection vs. Inner Subjective Sense of No Indiv.
Do
Lundy, you'd love Drukpa Kunlegs, the Divine Madman. Here's the
story of the enlightenment of Apa (more at http://www.keithdowman.net/books/dm.htm)
.Apa's
Refuge in SexOn
his return from
Great image!
Thanks, Jim
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Its like a mad uncle who is locked in a glass cage, with one way
> mirrors, in a symphony hall. The uncle hears symphonic music and is
> conducting the symphony with his baton. Very skillyfull
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>We are discussing here (I thought) how a thinking
> process could be going on without the indweller doing that thinking.
Your assumptions appears to be that there is an indweller. There isn't.
If there is an indwelling "cont
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>We are discussing here (I thought) how a thinking
> process could be going on without the indweller doing that thinking.
Your assumptions appears to be that there is an indweller. There isn't.
If there is an indwelling "c
Lundy, you'd love Drukpa Kunlegs, the Divine Madman. Here's the story of the enlightenment of Apa (more at http://www.keithdowman.net/books/dm.htm) .
Apa's Refuge in Sex
On his return from the Long Rong valley, the Lama entered an arid region which he named Lokthang Kyamo (Arid Land). Here he me
Fuckin A - You have my heart for
these.
- Original Message -
From:
TurquoiseB
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 10:47 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re:
Individuality: Outward Projection vs. Inner Subjective Sense of No Indiv.
Do
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, that was the silent extension of my thought: "unless one is
> hanging a shingle out for something -- books, seminars, students,
> attention."
>
> I have asked the question, "what is the value (much less the validit
D]> wrote:
> Maharishi is defining the value, in money for his lineage.
> - Original Message -
> From: akasha_108
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 10:08 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Individuality: Outward Projection vs.
In
Maharishi is defining the value, in
money for his lineage.
- Original Message -
From:
akasha_108
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 10:08 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re:
Individuality: Outward Projection vs. Inner Subjective Sense of
Which raises again a point of interest: what is the value (much less
the meaning) of the "title" of enlightenment? Everyone has some sort
of experience and knowledge right now. It appears presumtuous to know,
much less claim that this is the "end-state", much less that it is a
permanent end-state.
--- TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Good morning Uncle T:
> > >
> > > Bon après-midi...I'm in a different time zone.
> >
> > So Unc, what are you doing in France? Retired?
> Working? Where in
> > France? I spent some interesting time and
> Courcheval and Biarritz.
> > Just curiou
> > > Good morning Uncle T:
> >
> > Bon après-midi...I'm in a different time zone.
>
> So Unc, what are you doing in France? Retired? Working? Where in
> France? I spent some interesting time and Courcheval and Biarritz.
> Just curious.
No problemo. I'm in Paris. I came here to write
a book
There is a book that addresses this idea, it's called:
"Halfway up the Mountain, The Error of Premature Claims to
Enlightenment" by Mariana Caplan, Hohm Press
I read it over a year ago so it's not too fresh in my mind but I do
remember thinking that how did I know that the people in the book
w
on 5/13/05 9:21 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Good morning Uncle T:
>
> Bon après-midi...I'm in a different time zone.
So Unc, what are you doing in France? Retired? Working? Where in France? I
spent some interesting time and Courcheval and Biarritz. Just curious.
To subscri
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROT
> Good morning Uncle T:
Bon après-midi...I'm in a different time zone.
> > That's actually one reason I asked. There are some
> > schools of thought (like TM, when I was around) that
> > suggest that once realized, enlightenment is perma-
> > nent. There are others that believe that it can come
bject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re:
Individuality: Outward Projection vs. Inner Subjective Sense of No Indiv.
Do
Good morning Uncle T:On May 13, 2005, at 9:11 AM,
TurquoiseB wrote:> That's actually one reason I asked. There
are some> schools of thought (like TM, when I
Good morning Uncle T:
On May 13, 2005, at 9:11 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> That's actually one reason I asked. There are some
> schools of thought (like TM, when I was around) that
> suggest that once realized, enlightenment is perma-
> nent. There are others that believe that it can come
> and go.
> > Just as a question to the folks participating in this
> > discussion, do you assume that enlightenment, once
> > realized, is permanent? Since I've been away from TM
> > and its teachings for 20+ years, I'm trying to find out
> > whether we're on the "same page" here. I certainly do
> > not a
On May 13, 2005, at 7:25 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> Just as a question to the folks participating in this
> discussion, do you assume that enlightenment, once
> realized, is permanent? Since I've been away from TM
> and its teachings for 20+ years, I'm trying to find out
> whether we're on the "sam
The teachings were Tibetan in origin, and have to do with ways in
which one can definitely mess up after realization of enlightenment and
make it "go away." TIA,Unc
Nonesense. Chagdud Tulku
says, "Once one is able to see through samsara, that realization never goes
away." (Gates to Bud
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Llundrub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In other words the I am' ness (self) has to differentiate from the I
> as an organizing function, that is doing mistakes and learning from
> them. When this differentiation has not happened, the self (I am'
> ness) is
r bring the eye up close either way you see
the light through it.
> - Original Message -
> From: shanti2218411
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 5:55 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Individuality: Outward Projection
vs. Inner Subject
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 5:55 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re:
Individuality: Outward Projection vs. Inner Subjective Sense of No Indiv.
Do
--Actually it is my understanding that as her brain ca
advanced shebegan to experience a "regression&
--- shanti2218411 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --Actually it is my understanding that as her brain
> ca advanced she
> began to experience a "regression" back into
> ignorance ie ordinary
> waking state conciousness which included her again
> experiencing a
> sense of personal self.The latter dev
--Actually it is my understanding that as her brain ca advanced she
began to experience a "regression" back into ignorance ie ordinary
waking state conciousness which included her again experiencing a
sense of personal self.The latter development is certainly suggestive
that enlightment is dependen
In other words the I am' ness (self) has to differentiate from the
Ias an organizing function, that is doing mistakes and learning
fromthem. When this differentiation has not happened, the self (I
am'ness) is vulnerable in the heavy swell of life and also the I
asorganizing function can ha
Comments in between
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thank you Irmeli for your thoughtful post. In reading your response, I
think semantics, treating words with somewhat different meanings and
flavors, is the primary difference between our experiences. Pe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > (snipped the whole thing)
> >
> > First of all bear
> > Just to clarify, I didn't actually read that much
> > of it.
>
> Yes that was clear, that you didn't read the post. The post was
> substantially about experience. And that is why your post had the
> appearance of a hampster (per Judy's cross-post) -- or one flailing
> their arms in the dark.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Llundrub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ---A person shooting an arrow aiming for the bullseye who misses, is
a failure regardless of path. That my meaning, in the most
conventional sense. I get tired of semantics. I get alot of it here.
It's all like pizza wi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> akasha_108:
> > > You certainly don't read very carefully Barry. Maybe that hampster
> > > analogy does fit.
>
> Unc:
> > To each his or her own wheel. Me, I'm more interested
> > in getting off the wheel than ponderin
--- anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
snip
>
> I'd also like to ammend my earlier comment about
> experience always
> coming packaged with the knowledge necessary to
> understand the
> experience. Here's a counterexample that I thought
> of: that TM
> teacher who wrote a book about her
I don't know if I have a sense of humor or not- whatever. I do know
you have me laughing over all of your comments! The zebra tizzy was
especially priceless! Better than an amusement park, and I mean that
in the best sense!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for writing this Akasha. Made for a very interesting and
> insightful read.
Thank you. Your comments raised thoughts and some processing that I
had not done before. I learned some things.
> So now I'll amme
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> (snipped the whole thing)
>
> First of all bear with me because I have a bad cold and my brain is
> baking.
>
> I thought this was a great
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Becuase *someone* has/had to create that OS and that *someone* is me.
> > (or you..)
>
> =
> But why must that be so?
>
> Akasha d
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
See latest anon reply at the bottom:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > anon repl
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > anon replys to anon. hahaha.
>
>
> Enjoyable ;-)
>
> p.s. why does God make so many spelling mistakes?
>
> anon
Wa
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Irmeli Mattsson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
Thank you Irmeli for your thoughtful post. In reading your response, I
think semantics, treating words with somewhat different meaning
akasha_108:
> > You certainly don't read very carefully Barry. Maybe that hampster
> > analogy does fit.
Unc:
> To each his or her own wheel. Me, I'm more interested
> in getting off the wheel than pondering it... :-)
Just to clarify, I didn't actually read that much
of it. I have developed
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Flappity, floppity, flip
> The mouse on the mobius strip;
> The strip revolved,
> The mouse dissolved
> In a chronodimensional skip.
>
> So who owns the zebra?
The tooth paste ?
[ I take back the "Sense of humor
Flappity, floppity, flip
The mouse on the mobius strip;
The strip revolved,
The mouse dissolved
In a chronodimensional skip.
So who owns the zebra?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Sense of humor is not your strongest side, but you r getting
Failure? FAILURE?
What are you kidding me? I thought you were to some degree a Buddha head.
Why don't you just use the all purpose Buddhist tool of "no". No failure, no
success, no end, no beginning, no arrow, no target, no path. It's easy, if
you try to do something and "fail" just say "o
Sense of humor is not your strongest side, but you r getting better.
;)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Because God has decided to assume the identity of someone who
cannot
> spell well, for the moment. Because God is cloaking Himself as a
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > anon replys to anon. hahaha.
>
>
> Enjoyable ;-)
>
> p.s. why does God make so many spelling mistakes?
>
That's
Because God has decided to assume the identity of someone who cannot
spell well, for the moment. Because God is cloaking Himself as a
person who does not spell well. Perhaps because God just became
tired of spelling well and decided that the truth would come out
anyway. Because, because because
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> anon replys to anon. hahaha.
Enjoyable ;-)
p.s. why does God make so many spelling mistakes?
anon
>
> Please see below:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff
<[
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Llundrub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(snip)
Moreover, it's dissatisfying to me that I do fail so often in my
efforts in spite of 25 years of training. Just as does Maharishi
seemingly. Is there a devata of failure? ...
>
Failure? FAILURE? What ar
anon replys to anon. hahaha.
Please see below:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Becuase *someone* has/had to create that OS and that *someone* is
me.
> > (or you..)
>
> =
> But why must that be so?
It's not a must, it's just is !
> Ak
Thanks for writing this Akasha. Made for a very interesting and
insightful read.
So now I'll ammend my earlier statements about the utility of self-
inquiry: the practice may be helpful to some; it may be attractive
to some. Whether these two sets of people are the same isn't so
clear. For some
Thanks! Jim
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> human years per your question are just an illusion. No such thing
as
> time as
> what is human idea.
> I believe 'no time' became more common starting with Einstein's
> theory and quantum physics.
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> ...and each of your days is how long in human years please? Thanks,
Jim
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > though I don't have much work to do (finished it a
Thank you very much to both of you! This greatly clears up or
clarifies the distinction between a free Self and the doer illusion
for me.
All the Best,
Jim
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Irmeli Mattsson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Irmeli:
> > An I, who observes, makes interpretations, creates plans, acts,
and reacts, and often quite differently than the others.
> >
> >
> > Akasha:
> > Why do you necessarily subjectively equate that which observ
Well I don't think any less of you
because of it.
- Original Message -
From:
jim_flanegin
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 12:21
PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re:
Individuality: Outward Projection vs. Inner Subjective Sense
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Becuase *someone* has/had to create that OS and that *someone* is me.
> (or you..)
=
But why must that be so?
Akasha does self-inquiry by which he determines that the whole human
mind/body mechanism can take care
Hi Kirk,
This isn't me. Clues are that I don't use the f-word here (at least
not without a * replacing the 'u'), nor would I misspell Kodak as
Kodac.
Thanks,
Jim
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Llundrub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Best regards,
> Tom, I mean Jim, I mean, or wh
...and each of your days is how long in human years please? Thanks, Jim
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> though I don't have much work to do (finished it all in 6 days) I
> still like to take my lunch breaks. bbl
To subscribe, send a message to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> > >The main question is still pertenent:
> > > why
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >The main question is still pertenent:
> > why would one claim ownership, even identity with, the OS and/or its
> > upgrades, or the proc
I may need your 4 line version here (as well as all your posts.)
Sothat an 8-year old can understand. Best as I can figure out, you
arepresenting me with the middle finger mudra. I assume it has its
owndevata, but since you seem to be an ardent adherent of this
auspiciouspose, perhaps you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Llundrub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > But I do have one counterargument of my own. The windows XP
analogy
> is really great, but where do the bug fixes and upgrades come in?
; From: akasha_108
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 10:34 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Individuality: Outward Projection vs.
Inner Subjective Sense of No Indiv. Do
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Irmeli M
bject: [FairfieldLife] Re:
Individuality: Outward Projection vs. Inner Subjective Sense of No Indiv.
Do
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
"Irmeli Mattsson"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]...> wrote:>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]..
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Irmeli Mattsson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Irmeli:
> > An I, who observes, makes interpretations, creates plans, acts,
and reacts, and often quite differently than the ot
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You certainly don't read very carefully Barry. Maybe that hampster
> > analogy does fit.
>
> To each his or her own wheel. Me, I'm more int
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You certainly don't read very carefully Barry. Maybe that hampster
> analogy does fit.
To each his or her own wheel. Me, I'm more interested
in getting off the wheel than pondering it... :-)
Unc
To subscribe, s
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> You certainly don't read very carefully Barry. Maybe that hampster
> analogy does fit.
>
>
lol
oy, my belly, lol
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Akasha_108 wrote
RJ, I enjoy the conciseness of your posts -- and their sparsness.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Llundrub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My problem with akasha's specious - it's not confusing - it's not
adharmic - diatribe was that it was more than four sentences long.
Which tells me that
You certainly don't read very carefully Barry. Maybe that hampster
analogy does fit.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Akasha_108 wrote a lot of stuff -- 322 lines of stuff, in fact,
> about the issue in the subject line. While I appreciate the effor
So is your last name
108?
- Original Message -
From:
akasha_108
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 10:26
PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re:
Individuality: Outward Projection vs. Inner Subjective Sense of No Indiv.
Do
A - k - a
On May 11, 2005, at 11:22 PM, Llundrub wrote:
What's Akasha's name again.
Richard I believe.
Unc:
> > We start from where we are and work with what conscious-
> > ness we've got right now, here in the present. The future,
> > and any subsequent states of consciousness we find ourselves
> > in, will probably take care of themselves if we do a good
> > enough job with the present.
> >
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We start from where we are and work with what conscious-
> ness we've got right now, here in the present. The future,
> and any subsequent states of consciousness we find ourselves
> in, will probably take care of thems
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Irmeli:
> An I, who observes, makes interpretations, creates plans, acts, and
> reacts, and often quite differently than the others.
>
>
> Akasha:
> Why do you necessarily subjectively equate that which observes, ma
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 10:06 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Individuality: Outward Projection vs.
Inner Subjective Sense of No Indiv. Do
>
>
> Maybe you hit the wrong post. This post was Akasha responding to an
> Anon who what commenting on an Akasha post. No J
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry Jim, I have no idea what that means.
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > with all due respect, please quit digging your fingernails into my
> > arm. Thanks,
What's Akasha's name again.
- Original Message -
From:
akasha_108
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 10:06
PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re:
Individuality: Outward Projection vs. Inner Subjective Sense of No Indiv.
6 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Individuality: Outward Projection vs.
Inner Subjective Sense of No Indiv. Do
>
>
> To which Prick are you referring? Neither is a Tom to my knowledge.
> (There are so many anons who would know if one were Tom.) And Akasha
> is not a Tom.
>
&
PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re:
Individuality: Outward Projection vs. Inner Subjective Sense of No Indiv.
Do
To which Prick are you referring? Neither is a Tom to my
knowledge.(There are so many anons who would know if one were Tom.) And
Akashais not a Tom.Regardless, your comments
;t result in more thorns?
> - Original Message -
> From: akasha_108
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 8:29 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Individuality: Outward Projection vs.
Inner Subjective Sense of No Indiv. Do
>
&g
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
